<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Top Picks 2011: IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/top-picks-2011-iac-interactivecorp-iaci/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/top-picks-2011-iac-interactivecorp-iaci/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/top-picks-2011-iac-interactivecorp-iaci/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2011/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2011</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/interactivecorplogo.jpg" alt="IACI logo" /></em><em>This post is one in a series in which more than 60 newsletter advisors share their <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/top-picks-2011-favorite-stocks-from-60-advisors/">Top Stock Picks for 2011</a>. </em><em>This special report is courtesy of </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a>.</p>
<p>"IAC/InterActiveCorp (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) -- my top stock pick for the coming year -- is the company behind Match.com and Ask.com," says <a href="http://secure.buybackletter.com/">David Fried</a>.</p>
<p>The editor of <a href="http://secure.buybackletter.com/">The Buyback Letter</a> explains, "The company also operates more than 50 other website properties that make up the 8th largest network of websites in the world, with 246.3 million unique visitors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/top-picks-2011-iac-interactivecorp-iaci/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top Picks 2011: IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/top-picks-2011-iac-interactivecorp-iaci/">Top Picks 2011: IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/top-picks-2011-iac-interactivecorp-iaci/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19769255/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/top-picks-2011-iac-interactivecorp-iaci/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 stock picks</category><category>ask.com</category><category>barry diller</category><category>buyback letter</category><category>david friend</category><category>greg blatt</category><category>IACI</category><category>iacinteractive</category><category>internet stocks</category><category>martch.com</category><category>online stocks</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>stock picks for 2011</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>website stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google powers 72% of all U.S. web searches in February]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/google-powers-72-of-all-u-s-web-searches-in-february/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/google-powers-72-of-all-u-s-web-searches-in-february/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/google-powers-72-of-all-u-s-web-searches-in-february/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/goog.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) continued its torrid command of the internet search market in February, powering 72% of all those searches. As always, the next three competitors were way behind: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) has 17% of the market, <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) had 6% and Ask.com had 4%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/google-powers-72-of-all-u-s-web-searches-in-february/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google powers 72% of all U.S. web searches in February</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/google-powers-72-of-all-u-s-web-searches-in-february/">Google powers 72% of all U.S. web searches in February</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200903101359DOWJONESDJONLINE000652_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/google-powers-72-of-all-u-s-web-searches-in-february/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1484778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/google-powers-72-of-all-u-s-web-searches-in-february/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adsense</category><category>Ask.com</category><category>GOOG</category><category>google</category><category>Google Ads</category><category>Google search</category><category>GoogleAds</category><category>GoogleSearch</category><category>Hitwise</category><category>inthenews</category><category>msft</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask.com retools for more speed and relevance. Google doesn't care.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/ask-com-retools-for-more-speed-and-relevance-google-doesnt-car/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/ask-com-retools-for-more-speed-and-relevance-google-doesnt-car/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/ask-com-retools-for-more-speed-and-relevance-google-doesnt-car/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/ask.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">InterActive Corp.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) search engine and information portal Ask.com continues to try and re-invent itself to compete more heavily with search leader <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). With <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) being such a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/04/technology/04yahoo.html">large distraction over this past summer</a>, the time seemed appropriate for Ask.com to try -- again -- to take some steam from Google. From anyone, for that matter.<br /><br />It still won't happen. Here's why: Google's search product still is compelling to all that use it, even with marginally better search products. Google also has its hand in news, email, documents, spreadsheet, blogs, etc., and continues to recruit the customer that uses Google for everything possible on the web.<br /><br />Its main product is search and that also provides almost all its revenue. But how can Ask.com compete with something like this? A better product, faster search results, or a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/05/who-can-compete-with-google-search-besides-yahoo-and-microsoft/">more intuitive experience</a> won't cut it any longer. What Ask.com would need is a disruptive product to even think about competing with Google. It's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/05/who-can-compete-with-google-search-besides-yahoo-and-microsoft/">been over a few years</a> since I've written on Ask.com's foray into competing with Google. In many ways, it's superior. That's, unfortunately, no longer enough.<br /><br />Is Ask.com trying to win a losing battle? Perhaps. When Ask.com CEO Jim Safka says that Ask.com can recruit web searchers from Google with a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE49537Q20081006">30% speed increase in search results</a>, he's deluding himself. I'm not sure where that research came from, but Ask.com may be on its last stand. The search engine is pulling in ad revenue from the use of its products, and it may be content to grow steadily in that arena for the time being. But if it really wants to attack Google's ad revenue cash cow, something completely innovative and fresh needs to be forthcoming.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/ask-com-retools-for-more-speed-and-relevance-google-doesnt-car/">Ask.com retools for more speed and relevance. Google doesn't care.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE49537Q20081006>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/ask-com-retools-for-more-speed-and-relevance-google-doesnt-car/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1334400/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/ask-com-retools-for-more-speed-and-relevance-google-doesnt-car/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask Jeeves</category><category>Ask.com</category><category>AskJeeves</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IACI</category><category>inc.</category><category>InterActive Corp.</category><category>InteractiveCorp.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask.com turns over its online mapping business to Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/ask-com-turns-over-its-online-mapping-business-to-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/ask-com-turns-over-its-online-mapping-business-to-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/ask-com-turns-over-its-online-mapping-business-to-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/ask.jpg" alt="" />When Ask.com's mapping service was just getting up to speed as a very workable product, the company decided to jettison its in-house mapping service and instead install <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) own mapping service. Ask.com company parent <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">InterActive Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) apparently decided to cut some costs in the day and age of hyper-competition with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and Microsoft and just outsource a great product that was taking up too many resources with too little to show for it.<br /><br />Microsoft's Virtual Earth technology is now powering Ask.com mapping service. It should not be seen as defeat for Ask.com, as Microsoft's offering is superior in almost every way from my experience (and most likely, cheaper to license instead of maintaining an in-house product). This brings up an important question: is Ask.com in cost-cutting mode temporarily or permanently? The search engine and portal has seen its global market share sit pretty idle for the last year, as has Microsoft. Google, meanwhile, has slightly increased its search marketshare, Let's face it -- Ask.com, like those others, makes it's money in search (with smaller peripheral income sources of course).<br /><br />Where is Ask.com's future revenue going to come from? Search advertising? Shopping commissions? All of the above? If <a href="http://%20http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://%20http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) is possibly going to <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/070308-antitrust-review-of-google-yahoo-deal.html">outsource its search to Google</a>, what is stopping Ask.com from using Google's technology as well? That would literally pit Microsoft and Google as bulls racing towards each other. But if Ask.com is fretting over the continuance of its mapping product, search can't be that far behind. Then, the Ask.com brand will be the only thing left.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/ask-com-turns-over-its-online-mapping-business-to-microsoft/">Ask.com turns over its online mapping business to Microsoft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/07/02/destination-nowhere-ask-give-microsoft-map-business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/ask-com-turns-over-its-online-mapping-business-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1247266/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/ask-com-turns-over-its-online-mapping-business-to-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask Maps</category><category>Ask.com</category><category>AskMaps</category><category>IAC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Live Maps</category><category>Microsoft Maps</category><category>MicrosoftLiveMaps</category><category>MicrosoftMaps</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IAC/Interactive (IACI) gets into the dictionary business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/iac-interactive-iaci-gets-into-the-dictionary-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/iac-interactive-iaci-gets-into-the-dictionary-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/iac-interactive-iaci-gets-into-the-dictionary-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActiveCorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) needs to build up its little Ask.com franchise before it is spun out in a breakup of the parent company. Ask.com is an "also ran" in the search engine fight which includes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/goog/usa">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/goog/usa">GOOG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/usa">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/usa">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yhoo/usa">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yhoo/usa">YHOO</a>).</p>
<p>In an attempt to turn a loser into a contender, IACI is buying Lexico, which owns Dictionary.com, Thesaurus.com and Reference.com. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121082240023594593.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "Lexico sites drew about 15.6 million unique U.S. visitors in March, according to comScore Inc., compared with 55.4 million for Ask and an array of affiliated sites."</p>
<p>Even if the price of the new addition is low, the Lexico sites are not likely to do much good for the Ask.com franchise. It has already fallen so far behind the three search leaders that it almost certainly cannot catch up. Internet users have already set their preference in this part of the online market. Owning a dictionary site is not going to help that.</p>
<p>IACI's Ask.com can't come from behind and buying additional reference sites is not going to change that.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and the author of the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/10_stocks_under_10_dollars_newsletter.html">Ten Stocks Under $10 newsletter.</a></em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/iac-interactive-iaci-gets-into-the-dictionary-business/">IAC/Interactive (IACI) gets into the dictionary business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121082240023594593.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/iac-interactive-iaci-gets-into-the-dictionary-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196151/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/iac-interactive-iaci-gets-into-the-dictionary-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>GOOG</category><category>IACI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[InterActive Corp. (IACI) planning to dump Ask.com's search technology?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/interactive-corp-iaci-planning-to-dump-ask-coms-search-techn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/interactive-corp-iaci-planning-to-dump-ask-coms-search-techn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/interactive-corp-iaci-planning-to-dump-ask-coms-search-techn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/logoask.gif" />Will <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">InterActive Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) be dumping its search and information portal Ask.com? Sort of, according some insider accounts. It wouldn't be jettisoning Ask.com entirely -- it would just be getting rid of the technology that powers the search engine's results. The engine behind Ask.com, Teoma, could be taken out and replaced by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)'s technology.<br /><br />Google already has a stranglehold on internet search. It's been suggested for quite a while that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) dump its pride in its search engine technology (known as Project Panama for the last few years) and just use Google instead for powering its search engine. Does Google have that much power -- one that would make competitors use its search engine technology to power their own sites? Yes, it does.<br /><br />If Ask.com were to switch to just using Google, then the search service really <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/2/iac__ready_to_bail_on_ask_">would hold little value to the customers using it</a>. Sure, Ask.com would wrap Google search results in its own brand and customer interface, but would there truly be a compelling reason to use Ask.com at that point? Not really. Just like Yahoo!, Ask.com has spent huge amounts of cash to improve its search technology with little to show for it. <br /><br />That's the first-mover advantage Google has. Even if either had a better search service, that wouldn't mean more search customers. Then again, does either have a superior search service? I personally use Ask.com daily in addition to Google -- it's great. For my sole search engine service, though, it's not that good.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/interactive-corp-iaci-planning-to-dump-ask-coms-search-techn/">InterActive Corp. (IACI) planning to dump Ask.com's search technology?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/2/iac__ready_to_bail_on_ask_>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/interactive-corp-iaci-planning-to-dump-ask-coms-search-techn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1129142/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/interactive-corp-iaci-planning-to-dump-ask-coms-search-techn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>Barry Diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>IAC</category><category>IACI</category><category>InterActive Corp.</category><category>InteractiveCorp.</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask.com CEO relinquishes title amid InterActive shakeup]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/ask-com-ceo-relinquishes-title-amid-interactive-shakeup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/ask-com-ceo-relinquishes-title-amid-interactive-shakeup/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/ask-com-ceo-relinquishes-title-amid-interactive-shakeup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ask_large.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">InterActive Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">IACI</a>) is turning the executive offices upside down in a management shakeup, which will see Ask.com CEO Jim Lanzone leave the company. Lanzone will land at Redpoint Ventures as an <em>entrepreneur-in-residence</em> while he continues serving Ask.com in an advisory role for at least a few more months.<br /><br />InterActive is <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9847800-7.html">preparing to shed itself of several key properties</a>, including the Home Shopping Network (HSN), Ticketmaster, Interval International and Lending Tree. InterActive CEO and industry heavyweight Barry Diller said"<em>These changes are intended to strengthen and streamline the operating structure at IAC, both leading up to our intended spin-offs, and beyond</em>." <br /><br />Although Diller praised Lanzone for turning around Ask.com in his two-year tenure there, nothing has really changed with the search engine's market share in that time besides some small market share gains. I use Ask.com daily and find it to be a highly reliable and engaging experience. The problem is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) huge <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-mover_advantage"><em>first-mover advantage</em></a> in the internet search and advertising space. Ask.com has said <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/barry-diller-speaks-on-askcom-at-search-engine-strategies/3007/">it is fine with the industry placement</a> it has, but growth doesn't come by standing still. Yes, Ask.com still holds a decent fourth-place rating in the internet search industry -- but is that enough moving forward? Doubtful -- unless it can monetize its customers nicely and see growth in that arena.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/ask-com-ceo-relinquishes-title-amid-interactive-shakeup/">Ask.com CEO relinquishes title amid InterActive shakeup</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9847800-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/ask-com-ceo-relinquishes-title-amid-interactive-shakeup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1083210/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/10/ask-com-ceo-relinquishes-title-amid-interactive-shakeup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>Barry Diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>Jim Lanzone</category><category>JimLanzone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google again tops Internet search rankings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/google-again-tops-internet-search-rankings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/google-again-tops-internet-search-rankings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/google-again-tops-internet-search-rankings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/soymgr/427938487/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/427938487_54a3d2bd5c_m.jpg" /></a>In November internet search engine rankings by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comscore-inc/scor/nas">comScore</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comscore-inc/scor/nas">SCOR</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) again lead the pack, with 5.9 billion core searches conducted -- a 58.6% market share of all searches in the internet. This was almost the exact same level as October.<br /><br />Coming up a distant second (as usual) was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) with market share of 22.4%. The next three were <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) at 9.8%, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActiveCorp.'s</a> (NASADAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas"> IACI</a>) Ask.com at 4.6% and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) AOL at 4.5%. In November (a seasonally weak month for web searches), U.S. web searchers conducted 10 billion searches -- a 5% decline from October.<br /><br />Do these rankings surprise any web surfer? They shouldn't -- Google continues to dominate internet searches and Yahoo!'s Project Panama -- although technically a job well done -- is probably too late to the party to put any significant pressure on Google. Microsoft's Live Search push has garnered it about the same market share as in the past (a decent third place). The power of first-mover advantage is quite evident in Google's placement, and I'd suspect it's not going anywhere soon.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/google-again-tops-internet-search-rankings/">Google again tops Internet search rankings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1984>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/google-again-tops-internet-search-rankings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1070977/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/google-again-tops-internet-search-rankings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>comScore</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>iaci</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Search Engines</category><category>search rankings</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>SearchRankings</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask.com tries to market user privacy with AskEraser]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/ask-com-tries-to-market-user-privacy-with-askeraser/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/ask-com-tries-to-market-user-privacy-with-askeraser/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/ask-com-tries-to-market-user-privacy-with-askeraser/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC InterActive</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>)'s Ask.com has about 5% of the U.S. search engine market -- not much.</p>
<p>But the internet property is going to try to go against the trend. Instead of taking data from customers to target ads, Ask.com will let users "hide" their search data to promote privacy. The company is launching "AskEraser," which will destroy all personal information about a user. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/11/technology/11ask.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">According to</a> <em>The New York Times, </em>unlike typical online privacy controls that can be difficult for average users to find or modify, people will be able to turn AskEraser on or off with a single click."</p>
<p>The privacy police will probably be very happy about the announcement. But it takes a big targeting tool away from Ask, and Ask can use all the help that it can get. It has tried and tried but has had no success in prying search share from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>).</p>
<p>The move by Ask is based on the premise that most people care if search engines collect data on them to better target search results and advertising. Since very few people opt out of programs that collect data online, the answer is that almost no one gives a damn.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor </em><em>at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/ask-com-tries-to-market-user-privacy-with-askeraser/">Ask.com tries to market user privacy with AskEraser</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/11/technology/11ask.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/ask-com-tries-to-market-user-privacy-with-askeraser/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1059825/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/ask-com-tries-to-market-user-privacy-with-askeraser/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ask.com</category><category>AskEraser</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IACInterActiveCorp</category><category>privacy</category><category>private</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner shouldn't sell AOL, it should spin it off]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/time-warner-shouldnt-sell-aol-it-should-spin-it-off/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/time-warner-shouldnt-sell-aol-it-should-spin-it-off/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/time-warner-shouldnt-sell-aol-it-should-spin-it-off/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>Henry Blodget of AlleyInsider.com was out with <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/11/playing-the-aol.html">a report yesterday</a> calling for one of the big portals to be acquired again.<br /><br />"Amid all the speculation about Microsoft (MSFT) buying Yahoo (YHOO), Yahoo buying AOL (TWX), etc., one thing is nearly certain: One of these transactions will eventually take place -- and probably sooner rather than later. Why? Because Google has locked up the No. 1 spot in the sector, and market won't support more than three competitors."<br /><br />He also gives scenarios where <a href="http://MSFT">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://MSFT">MSFT</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) would be a buyer of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>)'s AOL. <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/11/why-yahoo-yhoo.html">Previously</a>, Blodget has covered Yahoo! buying AOL and has given other scenarios where AOL could or should become part of a larger company via an acquisition.<br /><br />But there are some additional issues here to consider. Let's pretend that Jeff Bewkes decided to just jettison AOL. The company still has some dial-up subscribers and it has invested much effort in its advertising platform, now renamed Platform A. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) made a $1 billion strategic investment and the terms originally dictated that a monetizing event of some sort would come due in early 2008 (that is right around the corner).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/time-warner-shouldnt-sell-aol-it-should-spin-it-off/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner shouldn't sell AOL, it should spin it off</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/time-warner-shouldnt-sell-aol-it-should-spin-it-off/">Time Warner shouldn't sell AOL, it should spin it off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/time-warner-shouldnt-sell-aol-it-should-spin-it-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1048971/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/time-warner-shouldnt-sell-aol-it-should-spin-it-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>AOL spin-off</category><category>AolSpin-off</category><category>Ask.com</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MSN.com</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A new search engine for Yahoo! (YHOO)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/a-new-search-engine-for-yahoo-yhoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/a-new-search-engine-for-yahoo-yhoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/a-new-search-engine-for-yahoo-yhoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/yahoo-yhoo.jpg" alt="Yahoo! NASDAQ:YHOO logo" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) is releasing a major upgrade to its search engine technology. The company calls the new version an improvement, but only time can tell whether that is accurate. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/41ed7124-7074-11dc-a6d1-0000779fd2ac.html">According to</a> the <em>FT</em> the product promises "more relevant answers to queries and integrates audio, video and photos into its results pages." <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and Ask.com have also released similar upgrades to their search products.</p>
<p>Yahoo! almost certainly spent a huge sum of money and precious engineering resources to bring the new product to market, but the company is in the unenviable position of launching a new version of its technology that is not likely to get it any additional marketshare. In other words, the company is running hard to stay in place. </p>
<p>It may be notable that the Yahoo! search improvement comes after those from Microsoft and Ask.com. It is a sign that being first to market in the most profitable part of the internet business is no longer prized because of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) huge lead.</p>
<p>For beaten down Yahoo!, a better mouse trap is not terribly valuable if there are no mice to catch.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at </em><em>24/7 Wall St.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/a-new-search-engine-for-yahoo-yhoo/">A new search engine for Yahoo! (YHOO)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/41ed7124-7074-11dc-a6d1-0000779fd2ac.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/a-new-search-engine-for-yahoo-yhoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1003061/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/a-new-search-engine-for-yahoo-yhoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barry Diller's daily life with IAC/InterActive (IACI)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/barry-dillers-daily-life-with-iac-interactive-iaci/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/barry-dillers-daily-life-with-iac-interactive-iaci/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/barry-dillers-daily-life-with-iac-interactive-iaci/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/barry-diller.jpg"  alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">InterActive Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">IACI</a>) has a head honcho with some meaty chops in the entertainment and publishing business. Barry Diller, who has spearheaded television, movies and now internet entertainment (among many other areas) was <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/columns/the-world-according-to/2007/09/21/An-interview-with-Barry-Diller#page2">interviewed recently</a> for his take on the past and his prowess on inventing the future, so to speak. Diller's claim to fame as he put it? Try this: "The only thing that's ever driven me is curiosity."<br /><br />Diller's internet empire stretches from Expedia.com (travel) to Ask.com (search). It also has other properties that hang somewhat in the balance, like LendingTree.com and TicketMaster.com. One of his most recent deals was plunking down $50 million for a majority stake in GarageGames so that consumers can play graphically rich games on their PCs not needing those PC-priced videogame consoles.<br /><br /> Lloyd Grove of Portfolio.com interview of Diller covers many subjects, the most fascinating of which are Diller's takes on how the internet is changing everything and why newspapers are on their way out. These are two items that I follow quite closely so when someone with Diller's track record voices his opinion on them, I'm interested.<br /><br />A few morsels: 1) IACI's stock in the last 10 years has done well despite turbulences in the last three to five years. 2) Wall Street doesn't understand InterActive since it is such a complex megamachine in a zillion business units, and 3) why web-based news aggregation and value-adding has not really been done yet (and why newspapers are quasi-doing that, but going downhill as a distribution medium).<br /><br />Diller's perspective is worth reading, whether you agree with him or not. He does get some plugs in for the companies he's involved with (what good leader wouldn't), <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/columns/the-world-according-to/2007/09/21/An-interview-with-Barry-Diller#page2">but his interview</a> is an entertaining read nonetheless.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/barry-dillers-daily-life-with-iac-interactive-iaci/">Barry Diller's daily life with IAC/InterActive (IACI)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.portfolio.com/views/columns/the-world-according-to/2007/09/21/An-interview-with-Barry-Diller#page2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/barry-dillers-daily-life-with-iac-interactive-iaci/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/996683/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/barry-dillers-daily-life-with-iac-interactive-iaci/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>barry diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>IAC</category><category>iac/interactive</category><category>iaci</category><category>InterActive</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poor data may once again lead to buyout speculation in Yahoo (YHOO)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/poor-data-may-once-again-lead-to-buyout-speculation-in-yahoo-yh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/poor-data-may-once-again-lead-to-buyout-speculation-in-yahoo-yh/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/poor-data-may-once-again-lead-to-buyout-speculation-in-yahoo-yh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>Yesterday, comScore released the July market share <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1583">data for the search engine industry</a>. The results were not pretty for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), with its share standing at just 23.5% for the month, way behind <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) 55.2% share of the market. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) stood at 12%, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActiveCorp's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) Ask.com at 4.7% and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) at 4.4%.<br /><br />While the market share data was being released, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer was telling Bloomberg that Yahoo would be an expensive acquisition. However, Ballmer may be positioning Microsoft to once again approach the No. 2 search engine company. Earlier this year, news reports circulated that Microsoft and Yahoo were in partnership discussions.<br /><br />By combining its own sites with that of Yahoo's, Microsoft's market share would quickly jump to 36% market share -- not too bad. With the Internet just over ten years old, paying $50 billion for that much market share may be the best money Microsoft can spent. To date, the PC-centric software giant has had a tough time with most of its Internet initiatives. Conversely, Yahoo CEO, Jerry Yang, has to realistically assess its ability to catch up to the Google machine.<br /><br />At the end of the day, the Silicon Valley-based search company may have to swallow its pride and hook up with the much despised Washington-based software giant. Microsoft would get to utilize its deep bench of software engineers with a powerful and underutilized portal, while Yahoo would get to move away from its foray into the media business and move back to being a technology driven company.<br /><br />It may be their last chance to survive and thrive in the Internet era before having their lunches completely eaten by Google.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/poor-data-may-once-again-lead-to-buyout-speculation-in-yahoo-yh/">Poor data may once again lead to buyout speculation in Yahoo (YHOO)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1583>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/poor-data-may-once-again-lead-to-buyout-speculation-in-yahoo-yh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/970286/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/poor-data-may-once-again-lead-to-buyout-speculation-in-yahoo-yh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ask.com</category><category>buyout</category><category>comscore</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iaci</category><category>interactive corp</category><category>InteractiveCorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>speculation</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IAC Interactive earnings: Bad news all around]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/iac-interactive-bad-news-all-around/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/iac-interactive-bad-news-all-around/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/iac-interactive-bad-news-all-around/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActiveCorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/iac-reports-q2-results/n20070731074009990040">released second quarter</a> 2007 results , reporting $1.5 billion in revenue, representing a 6% rate of growth over the prior year. The company also posted $136 million in Operating Income Before Amortization, compared to $165 million in the year ago period. Adjusted EPS was $0.31, compared to $0.32 in the year ago period.</p>
<p>Operating income fell 33% to $54.4 million.</p>
<p>On a segment basis, revenue at the big retailing operation, which includes HSN, was up only 1% to $701.4 million. Operating income for the division fell 31% to $34.5 million.</p>
<p>Revenue in the transaction segment, which includes TicketMaster, was up 2% to $441.9 million. Operating income fell 36% to $48.5.</p>
<p>The media and advertising segment, which includes Ask.com, had revenue growth of 33% to $174 million. But, the segment had a loss of $10.7 million.</p>
<p>It looks like the small conglomerate is not doing very well and Ask.com does not appear to be bringing home the bacon.</p>
<p>Wall Street could fairly question why Barry Diller has all of these companies under one roof. They do each other very little good.</p>
<p>IACI stock was indicating down 4.6% just before the market opened at 9:26 am.<br /> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/iac-interactive-bad-news-all-around/">IAC Interactive earnings: Bad news all around</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/iac-reports-q2-results/n20070731074009990040>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/iac-interactive-bad-news-all-around/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/954275/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/iac-interactive-bad-news-all-around/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>Barry Diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>iac/interactivecorp</category><category>iaci</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google loses insignificant piece of market share]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>With <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) set to release its quarterly financial performance report this afternoon, will the internet search and advertising leader have another blowout quarter? All signs point to yes, according to my magic 8-ball. But until then, the Mountain View, Calif., company can soak up the knowledge that, gasp, it actually <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1525">lost a tiny percentage</a> of internet search market share in June. Oh no! Let loose the hounds! <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/microsofts-search-division-has-a-big-june/">Microsoft made a few gains</a> as well -- so is Google sweating? Very doubtful.<br />
<p>Actually, fluctuations happen every single month among the internet search kingpins like Google, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews"> YHOO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Ask.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">IACI</a>). When Google and Yahoo! swap a half of a percentage point in market share for internet search, blog entries (like this one) and the media play it up. It's a non-issue, though. There are an infinite number of variables during each month globally -- like PC shipments, broadband internet penetration, mobile phone sales and marketing programs from all the search leaders -- which all affect market share in these nice little percentage slices.<br /><br />Google web properties held fast in June with a 49.5% share of the U.S. search market, while Yahoo! sat at a comfortable 25.1% of the U.S. market. Microsoft was in third place with 13.2% and Ask.com and its network saw a market share of 5%. In fifth was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>)'s AOL unit, with 4.2%. To put those percentages into perspective, U.S. internet customers conducted 8 billion searches in June, up 26% from June 2006. So, although the percentages are staying pretty much the same in terms of proportion, the actual volume has spiked nicely from a year ago. And, Google is still taking the lion's share. Minor percentage drop? Google's still sitting very pretty.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/">Google loses insignificant piece of market share</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1525>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/942589/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google share</category><category>Google, Inc.</category><category>Google,Inc.</category><category>GoogleShare</category><category>IACI</category><category>Internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>MSFT</category><category>TWX</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay throws fit, then crawls back to Google]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>Every time you look at your children and wish they would grow up and stop being so immature, remember that the two are not synonomous. Case in point -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>). The market-leading auction website left <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) AdWords advertising system because it was miffed that Google planned a party the same day as eBay's annual user celebration in Boston.<br /><br />Well after crying at its party, eBay came crawling back, apparently realizing that although it has other options -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActiveCorp's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) Ask.com, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) MSN.com -- none are nearly as good as AdWords. EBay's inability to stay away serves as an example of Google's strength in the Internet advertising market.<br /><br />Of course, this is not what eBay is claiming. EBay spokesman Hani Durzy said, "Overall the takeaway for us was that we weren't as dependent on AdWords as some out there may have thought... Other partners -- Yahoo and AOL and MSN -- really stepped up and provided a lot of value. And natural search continues to drive a lot of valuable traffic to the site."<br /><br />Empty words, since the actions don't coincide.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/">eBay throws fit, then crawls back to Google</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/925959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertise</category><category>advertising</category><category>adwords</category><category>aol</category><category>ask.com</category><category>ebay</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iaci</category><category>interactive corp</category><category>InteractiveCorp</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>online</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 6-22-07: FIG volatility flat as investors compare to Blackstone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/option-update-6-22-07-fig-volatility-flat-as-investors-compare/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/option-update-6-22-07-fig-volatility-flat-as-investors-compare/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/option-update-6-22-07-fig-volatility-flat-as-investors-compare/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fortress-investment-group-llc/fig/nys"><strong><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></strong><strong>Fortress Investment</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fortress-investment-group-llc/fig/nys">FIG</a>) volatility flat. Investors compare FIG to Blackstone (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bx/nys">BX</a>). FIG, a global alternative asset manager with approximately $36 billion assets under management, has a market cap of $10.5 billion. Blackstone, a <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/">private equity</a> firm, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/blackstone-ipo-looking-for-the-greater-fool/">initial public offering</a> was priced at $31 a share, valuing BX at about $33.6 billion. BX manages $88.4 billion, including $19.6 billion in its most recent buyout fund according to Bloomberg. FIG overall option implied volatility of 38 is near its 21-week average according to Track Data. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActive</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) option implied volatility flat at 27. IACI closed at $35. Stifel Nicolaus said on 6/20/07 that it was "upgrading shares of IACI to Buy from Hold and initiating a $42 12-month target price. Our upgrade of IACI is based on 60% probability of a material corporate event occurring within the next 6-months." IACI overall option implied volatility of 27 is near its 26-week average of 25 according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional price fluctuations. </p>
<p><em>Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/option-update-6-22-07-fig-volatility-flat-as-investors-compare/">Option update 6-22-07: FIG volatility flat as investors compare to Blackstone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/option-update-6-22-07-fig-volatility-flat-as-investors-compare/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/924114/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/option-update-6-22-07-fig-volatility-flat-as-investors-compare/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ask.com</category><category>assets under management</category><category>AssetsUnderManagement</category><category>Barry DIller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>blackstone</category><category>bx</category><category>fig</category><category>Fortress Investment</category><category>FortressInvestment</category><category>iac/interactive</category><category>iaci</category><category>InterActive</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>private equity firm</category><category>PrivateEquityFirm</category><category>Ticketmaster</category><category>travel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask.com readies itself for another Google war]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/ask-com-readies-itself-for-another-google-war/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/ask-com-readies-itself-for-another-google-war/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/ask-com-readies-itself-for-another-google-war/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/ask.gif" alt="" />Ask.com, the web search service that is owned and operated by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas ">IAC/InterActive Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>), has been fighting the good fight over the last year with a television, print and radio campaign that practically begs consumers to give its search service a try instead of just defaulting to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)</p>
<p> While <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) are also competitors, Ask.com has chosen to focus its competitive stirrings directly on Google.<br /><br />I use Ask.com every day, as some of the features the service provides are actually more intuitive and easier for my line of work that what Google can provide, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/05/who-can-compete-with-google-search-besides-yahoo-and-microsoft/">something I wrote about about this time last year</a>. But I use Google the majority of the time, like most web searchers.</p>
<p>Ask.com's search market share really has not made significant strides against Google lately, although it has grown a bit. The company is again targeting Google with a <a href="http://www.ask.com/">revamped and enhanced search page</a> that is designed to get more people using Ask.com's service.<br /><br />In fact, the services that Ask.com is now highlighting look like they were taken from Google's recent "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/google-universal-search-may-bring-more-copyright-lawsuits/">Universal Search</a>" play book. While it's a joy to use Ask.com every day, the company's battle to win more market share will never be easy. Google's brand recognition alone will be nearly impossible for any competitor to topple. </p>
<p>That's not to say Ask.com can't make gains (nor Yahoo! or Microsoft). The only unfortunate part is that even building an equal or semi-equal product does not guarantee customers will dump a competitor to come to you.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/ask-com-readies-itself-for-another-google-war/">Ask.com readies itself for another Google war</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=9590>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/ask-com-readies-itself-for-another-google-war/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/911768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/ask-com-readies-itself-for-another-google-war/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask search</category><category>Ask.com</category><category>AskSearch</category><category>barry diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google search</category><category>GoogleSearch</category><category>IACI</category><category>internet advertising</category><category>InternetAdvertising</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search adveritising</category><category>search market</category><category>SearchAdveritising</category><category>SearchMarket</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's mobile effort sees heightened competition]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/googles-mobile-effort-sees-heightened-competition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/googles-mobile-effort-sees-heightened-competition/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/googles-mobile-effort-sees-heightened-competition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p>Leading internet companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) realize that there are more mobile phones in use on the planet than personal computers. As such, both companies have started beefing up mobile phone offerings to ensure they have the latest and greatest tools out there for <a href="http://rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070514/FREE/70514005/1012">customers who access the web more from their phones</a> (like much of Japan). In addition to that contingent, there are increasing amounts of customers who are constantly on the go but need to be connected at the same time (a void the BlackBerry has filled quite nicely).<br /><br />So, <a href="http://www.google.com/xhtml">Google</a> and <a href="http://mobile.yahoo.com">Yahoo!</a> (and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp</a>.-- NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) have full information portals ready for your cellphone. Google Maps even emulates the successful Google Earth software by providing driving directions and satellite maps right on your cellphone screen. Enter Ask.com, which has <a href="http://rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070514/FREE/70514005/1012">announced that it will integrate GPS</a> (global positioning system) capabilities into its mobile search product, which puts the company in direct and increasing competition with the likes of Google and Yahoo! No surprise there, since the company, owned by Barry Diller's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">IAC/InterActiveCorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">IACI</a>), has been competing with both companies for quite some time in internet search.<br /><br />This may sound insignificant now, but as more computing horsepower makes its way to mobile handsets, and as wireless networks evolve to ensure broadband internet speeds are available to customers, the mobile front will be one of the new frontiers that internet companies will tackle in order to create business models to monetize that space. Right now, Google, Yahoo! and Ask.com are really into the space, and if all three are successful, the hundreds of millions of mobile phones in the U.S. and globally will hopefully become cash cows for those companies that see the vision of what lies ahead.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/googles-mobile-effort-sees-heightened-competition/">Google's mobile effort sees heightened competition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 May 2007 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070514/FREE/70514005/1012>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/googles-mobile-effort-sees-heightened-competition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/896395/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/googles-mobile-effort-sees-heightened-competition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Mobile</category><category>Google, Inc.</category><category>Google,Inc.</category><category>GoogleMobile</category><category>IAC Media</category><category>IacMedia</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IAC Interactive makes play late in mobile space]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/13/iac-interactive-makes-play-late-in-mobile-space/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/13/iac-interactive-makes-play-late-in-mobile-space/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/13/iac-interactive-makes-play-late-in-mobile-space/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p>The mobile search trains of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) left the station some time ago. Even <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">Nokia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">NOK</a>), the world's largest handset company has <a href="http://www.cio.com/article/108603/Google_and_Web_Search_Rivals_Battle_for_Big_Bucks_on_Small_Screens">its own search</a> function. </p>
<p>With the estimates for mobile-based advertising pointing to $11 billion, according to Informa PLC, no one wants to be left behind.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/Interactive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) will launch its own <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117891161254900258.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Ask Mobile software</a>, which will include features from some of the parent's other websites, including City Search and Ticket Master. It will be introduced with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">Sprint</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">S</a>). </p>
<p>No matter how well the service works, it has two drawbacks. The first is that Ask.com is among the smallest search operations, with about 5% of the U.S. market. It brings that small share and a relatively late introduction to the mobile space to the table. It is also forming its first partnership with the weakest of the Big Three mobile carriers, which may be an indication it could not get <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">AT&amp;T</a> Wireless (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon</a> Wireless (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) to take the product.</p>
<p>Better late than never.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/13/iac-interactive-makes-play-late-in-mobile-space/">IAC Interactive makes play late in mobile space</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 13 May 2007 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/13/iac-interactive-makes-play-late-in-mobile-space/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/894936/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/13/iac-interactive-makes-play-late-in-mobile-space/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask Mobile</category><category>Ask.com</category><category>City Search</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IAC</category><category>IACI</category><category>mobile search</category><category>MobileSearch</category><category>NOK</category><category>Nokia</category><category>Sprint</category><category>Ticketmaster</category><category>Verizon</category><category>VZ</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
