The U.S. Government 'adds' $5 trillion in debt, but the dollar doesn't fall. How is this possible?

"Because the currency markets months ago had already factored-in or priced into the dollar some form of U.S. Government takeover of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," Andrew Resnick, currency trader, told BloggingStocks Monday.

The U.S. Treasury will buy as much as $200 billion in new, senior, preferred stock in Fannie (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie (NYSE: FRE) as part of its takeover of the government service giants, whose business models ran into trouble as the housing boom ended and mortgage defaults soared. The large, potential increase in government spending/borrowing would appear to be unquestionably dollar-bearish. Not so, says Resnick.

"The bailout is going to cost the U.S. Government and taxpayers more money, there's no doubt about that. But if it represents the first step toward reaching a bottom in the housing mess and at the same time stabilizes credit markets, that would be dollar bullish," Resnick said. "And that's the currency market's view at the present time."

Indeed, the dollar showed little signs of a collapse Monday. After dipping early Monday morning in Asia, the dollar firmed and was up about one-half cent to $1.4430 versus the euro, and added three-tenths of a cent versus the British pound. The dollar was rose about 1 yen to 108.52 versus Japan's yen and rose 1 cent to $1.1290 versus the Swiss Franc.

With a home near the capital of the world, decades ago the parents of yours truly were able to locate and purchase the best and most effective books for their children during their grade school development years.

Dad usually chose books that emphasized cognitive development, while Mom emphasized books and exercises that stimulated creativity, and that had happy endings.

To be sure, Morgan Stanley economist Stephen Roach's macroeconomic reports would not have met Mom's requirement for happy endings.

Roach's post-bubble world

Roach, who now also serves as Morgan Stanley's (NYSE: MS) Asia Chairman, takes the pulse of the U.S. and global economies, the housing slump, the credit crisis, and the financial system, in his most recent report. (pdf)

And, consistent with Roach's reputation for sobering analysis, his economic forecast for the quarters and years ahead is not pleasant, and it differs markedly from the current consensus in financial circles.

That current consensus argues that the U.S. Federal Reserve's recently-established liquidity facilities, combined with the U.S. Treasury's back-up measures, will enable banks and others with bad mortgages and bad mortgage-backed bonds to muddle-through, slowly working-off these debts as revenues increase as the U.S. economy recovers. Likewise, the U.S. housing sector and consumer demand also will recover, as home prices stabilize and consumption returns to more-normal levels as U.S. GDP increases. It's a sort of 'end to the banking and housing crises by a growing U.S. economy better-able to service those bad debts' argument.

Wall Street, really a typical, small, village-like setting, save for the fact that about $8-12 trillion dollars in capital passes through its vortex daily, is a pulse-taking community. And for a dose of reality to counter-balance the sometimes too-rosy institutional research, the Street looks to the 'perpetual pessimist,' Stephen Roach, Morgan Stanley's (NYSE: MS) Asia Chairman.

Roach's take on economic state-of-things as the United States gets back to work this fall? Don't play "Happy Days Are Here Again" just yet. Roach said the global economic slowdown has only just begun, with the United States heading into a recession and the impact of the credit crunch still roiling through financial institutions around the world, Bloomberg News reported.

"There's more to this macro event than just the credit-market contagion itself," Roach told Bloomberg News. "Maybe two-thirds of that is behind us, but the impacts on the real side of the U.S. economy and the global economy are at an early stage.''

U.S., global economies slow together

Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Wednesday Roach's analysis and comments should not be ignored by executives, small business owners, or typical citizens as they set their budgets and financial plans for the year ahead.

There are signs that banks and others are expecting another round of credit write-offs. Banks are becoming more hesitant to lend on speculation credit losses will increase as the global economic slowdown deepens, Bloomberg News reported Monday.

For borrowing, banks are charging each other a 77-basis-point premium above what traders predict the U.S Federal Reserve's daily, effective Federal Funds rate will average over the next three months, up from 24 basis points in January, Bloomberg News reported.

Banks concerned about potential write-offs, global slowdown

Economist Peter Dawson said Monday two factors are driving the widening short-term lending spread.

"Rightly or mistakenly, there's a suspicion that selected banks will announce another round of write-offs," Dawson said. "Second, banks are coming to grips with the reality of the global slowdown. The slowdown suggests reduced revenue for banks, which would further hurt already strained balance sheets, and make banks more-reluctant to lend."

In August 2007, banks began to hoard cash and pare-back lending after subprime mortgage defaults forced two Bear Stearns hedge funds to seek bankruptcy protection. A series of regional, mortgage asset-related write-offs followed, as the housing boom ended, first in the United States, then in the United Kingdom. Mortgage-related credit losses now total more than $500 billion worldwide, Dawson said.

Sometimes -- but by no means always -- the stupid questions are the most illuminating.

Tuesday's 'stupid question' concerns stress and the U.S. economy. Namely, could the U.S. economy handle more housing stress? Or, put another way, what would the U.S. economy look like with another round of major write-offs for housing-related losses?

"It's not an economic model we want to project, but project we must," economist David H. Wang said. "First, for one thing, another round of large write-offs would, as they say, end all doubt regarding a U.S. recession. We would record negative GDP for Q3 and Q4, at minimum, most likely for Q1 2009 as well."

"Second, you're looking at additional consolidation in investment banking and commercial banking," Wang said. "Third, there would be considerable U.S. Government involvement, the scope and amount of intervention by the U.S. Treasury and Fed [U.S. Federal Reserve] is difficult to specify, until the size of the problem is known."

It's hard to identify a silver lining in the above, but Wang found one, "but we don't want to go there," he said. Another series of large, housing-related write-offs "would most likely propel Congressionally-backed, federally-directed structural changes in banking, mortgage finance, securities, and financial regulation," Wang said.

"It's one thing if the nature of the bailout is another $50 or $100 billion. But if it amounts to the takeover of a large bank or Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), the American economy would see its biggest changes since the New Deal," Wang said. "These changes would most likely end, once and for all, the 'heads-the-banks-win/tails-the-government-pays' banking system. You'd most likely see a two-tier banking system."

Not the 'end of the beginning' for housing losses?

Moreover, there are signs that it's not 'the end of the beginning' regarding housing and credit market stress, at least in the view of the former chief economist for the International Monetary Fund.

It's been over a year since I last posted on liar loans -- these are mortgages which the borrower obtains despite offering no documentation on their income, employment or assets. These liar loans were also known as Ninja loans -- which is short for no income, no job, and no assets. The Associated Press reports that such liar loans will add $100 billion to the losses our economy is already suffering thanks to $400 billion worth of losses from subprime mortgages.

The problem we face as an economy is that it's hard to see where the liar loans end and the collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and other asset-backed securities begin. In a sense, they are all liar loans. In the case of the mortgages, borrowers created paperwork that was inconsistent with their actual financial condition so they could get the money. In the case of CDOs, the issuing investment bank bought a AAA rating from a rating agency which created the illusion that the security was safe. Conceptually, there is little difference -- both depended on essentially forged paperwork to make the loan go through.

Why did banks issue liar loans? They were afraid to lose market share. But that doesn't make it right. As my mother used to say to me, if the other kids jumped off the Empire State Building, would you do it too? AP brings this to life in an interview with David Zugheri, co-founder of Texas-based lender First Houston Mortgage who said, "Everybody drank the Kool-Aid. They knew if they didn't give the borrower the loan they wanted, the borrower could go down the street and get that loan somewhere else.''

BNP Paribas, which helped signal the global credit crisis that started one year ago this week, has emerged from the credit crunch as France's healthiest bank, Bloomberg News reported Monday.

BNP Paribas will announce Q2 financial results this week. While earnings are expected to be lower year-over-year, they will probably be better than those of its rivals, Societe Generale SA and Credit Agricole SA, according to Bloomberg. BNP Paribas fell 1.76 euros to 59.77 euros in Monday afternoon trading in Paris.

About a year ago, on August 9, 2007, BNP Paribas halted withdrawals from three funds that invested in subprime mortgage debt. The bank's announcement proved to be the first of dozens credit-loss and write-down announcements by banks, mortgage lenders and other institutional investors, as subprime assets went bad, due to defaults by subprime mortgage payers.

The losses and resulting credit crunch compelled the intervention by the world's major central banks. The U.S. Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank and Bank of Canada made hundreds of billions of dollars available in specialized loans through conventional monetary policy tools and via new, special 'facilities,' in an effort to maintain credit market liquidity and prevent bad bank/mortgage lender business models from undermining healthy sectors and the broader economies in the United States and the European Union.

Economic growth is the major concern today

London-based economist Mark Chandler told BloggingStocks Monday that concern about credit markets freezing up again has diminished, but concern about the impact of the housing sector's slowdown on broader economies has not.

Barclays is expected to receive a $927 million capital investment from Japan's Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group as part of a plan to restore depleted capital, Bloomberg News reported Friday.

Barclays (NYSE: BCS), the United Kingdom's fourth largest bank, has been hurt by write-downs stemming from the end of the U.S. housing boom and subsequent mortgage and related asset-backed bond defaults.

Barclays' shares fell $1.29 to $24.28 on the news in Friday morning trading.

London-based economist Mark Chandler told BloggingStocks there are three positives stemming from the announcement. First, banking regulators in the U.K. will view it as "a coming to terms, something markets around the globe will also appreciate." Second, it demonstrates that investors "are still willing to jump into the pool and commit capital for less than ideal ventures, so you can see how the markets will look favorably on that." Chandler added that he does not have a rating on nor own shares in Barclays.

Japan's banks: capital to deploy

Finally, Mitsui's commitment to a bank abroad indicates that Japanese banks have repaired the worst of their balance sheets. "A Japanese bank would not commit funds abroad if their balance sheet was not solid," Chandler said. "Japan's banks have rebuilt their businesses, and are in better shape than they were a decade ago. Unfortunately, I'm afraid it looks like the world's bank concerns have shifted to the U.S. and U.K. for this decade."

The perceptive and common sense-rooted Ben Stein, in a business column in The New York Times, has weighed-in on the credit crisis, and for market absolutists, it's an argument they probably don't want to hear.

Stein, like many of us, has pondered how the massively well-paid men and women of Wall Street could create such a catastrophe. How did some of the smartest, talented executives, Stein ruminates, generate such immense losses that "they made banks clam up on lending -- at great risk to the economy?"

Compelling questions

Stein asks: Where were the fail-safe devices? The government watchdogs? The ratings agencies? A speech by Greenlight Capital hedge fund manager David Einhorn at a Grant's Interest Rate Observer event, provided the answers -- the unfortunate truths of the recent housing/credit boom -- which Stein summarized:

Billionaire investor George Soros believes the current financial crisis is the worst since the Great Depression, and said stocks have not bottomed yet, Bloomberg News reported Thursday.

Soros said the most recent market bottom "will probably not prove to be the final bottom," adding that the current stock rebound will last six weeks to three months as the United States moves closer to recession, Bloomberg News reported.

Further, Soros, in an op-editorial column in The Financial Times, argued that the cause of the market's current problems is a flawed premise: the belief that markets are self-correcting and tend toward equilibrium. They aren't and don't, Soros argues, and the laissez-faire policy creates bubbles, including the most-recent housing bubble, which, in turn, when it started to burst, led to the current credit crunch.

Soros cites deregulation

Soros added that the market's current troubles originated in 1980 when U.S. President Ronald Reagan and United Kingdom Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher led a laissez-faire movement that reduced/eliminated regulation of banks and financial markets, the FT reported.

Banks are demanding more capital from hedge funds to support outstanding loans resulting in the dissolution of some funds forced to liquidate assets, Bloomberg News reported Monday.

``If you have leverage, you're stuffed,'' Alex Allen, chief investment officer of London-based Eddington Capital Management Ltd., which has $195 million invested in hedge funds for clients, told Bloomberg News. Allen said the crisis is like a bank panic turned upside down with bankers, not depositors, concerned they won't get their money back. He added there are likely to be more collateral /margin-related liquidations of hedge funds in the weeks ahead.

The $2 trillion hedge fund industry is in the throes of its worst capital crunch since the Federal Reserve successfully encouraged the securities industry to provide $3.6 billion to bail-out Long Term Capital Management L.P. in 1998. Amplified by leverage and aided by innovative investment formulas, many hedge funds generated outstanding returns for much of this decade, often aided by high-performing asset-backed securities. However, as the housing market slowed and mortgage-backed securities began to fail, hedge funds started to experience the down side of their deployed leverage: banks and other counterparties who lent money for these investments had the right to and initiated requests that hedge funds put up more capital. Hedge funds that could not meet the capital requirement have been liquidated.

Undergrad and graduate students may soon be feeling the pinch of the subprime mortgage default-induced credit crunch.

Securities tied to student loans have failed to generate investors' interest, leaving roughly $3 billion in a sort of limbo, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday (subscription required).

Typically, the banks involved in the deal -- in this case Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), J. P. Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) and Citigroup (NYSE: C) -- would step in to buy the securities when demand is weak. However, because the major banks are already flush with loans and bonds they're trying to get rid of, they have been allowing the auctions to fail, The Journal reported.

Student loan manager Sallie Mae (NYSE: SLM) fell 42 cents to $19.73 on the news in Tuesday morning trading.

Bond demand is weak

The auction process is similar to those held for municipal bonds, corporate debt and other debt securities. However, Wall Street is not obligated to step in and buy student loan-backed securities when demand is weak.

The head of State Street's (NYSE: STT) investment unit has resigned, the company announced Thursday. It also said that it will set aside $618 million, including $279 million, or 71 cents per share, to establish a fund to cover legal and related costs due to losses in its fixed-income strategies.

State Street said William Hunt, CEO of State Street Global Advisors (SSgA), was replaced by James Phalen on an interim basis. Phalen will report directly to State Street's CEO, Ronald Logue.

"We have reviewed the actively managed fixed-income strategies at SSgA that contained investments backed by sub-prime mortgages. Based on our review and discussions with certain customers who were invested in these strategies, we have established this reserve to address legal exposure and other costs relating to these strategies," Logue said in a statement.

Including the aforementioned earnings charge, 2007 earnings per share are expected to be $3.42-$3.45. Excluding the charge, 2007 earnings per share are expected to be $4.54-$4.57. The Reuters 2007 EPS consensus estimate for STT is $4.20, excluding charges.

Relief rally?

Wall Street's reaction to State Street's announcement was decidedly not negative, as State Streets' shares gained more than 5% or $4.72 to $83.61 in Thursday morning trading.

Bank of America Corporation (NYSE: BAC) announced Monday it closed a $12 billion, enhanced money fund after major clients pulled-out amid losses on complex asset-back securities, including structured investment vehicles, Bloomberg News reported.

The Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio was closed last week and is being "wound down," Bank of America spokesman Robert Stickler told Bloomberg News. Sticker said the fund's net asset value, which had been $33 billion two weeks ago, was 99.4 cents on the dollar as of Monday.

How vulnerable is your mutual fund to the ongoing mortgage meltdown? In this series, BloggingStocks contributor Lita Epstein, author of more than 20 books including Trading for Dummies and The Complete Idiot's Guide to Improving Your Credit Score, digs into mutual funds' holdings looking for securities with exposure to the currently shaky credit markets.

The first inkling I got that Fidelity might be tied to the SIV bailout was a story last week in The Wall Street Journal that indicated Fidelity's Prime Money Market Portfolio owned $402 million medium-term notes in Gordian's Sigma Finance Inc. as of the end of August [subscription required]. Taking a closer look at Fidelity Funds, I found two broad market bond funds with significant exposure to the mortgage-backed and asset-backed credit categories now showing signs of trouble.

As of 9/30/2007 Fidelity Ultra Short Bond Fund holds 42.4% of its assets in asset-backed securities, 17.5% in collateralized mortgage obligations and 15.2% in commercial mortgage-backed securities. That's 75.1% of its assets in securities tied to the credit markets that are now showing signs of trouble. While I'm not saying that 75% of this fund's assets are in trouble, what I am asking is, do you really want that much exposure to these markets in this volatile time?

As of 9/30/2007 Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund holds 23.1% of its assets in asset-backed securities, 13.5% in collateralized mortgage obligations, and 11.6% in commercial mortgage-backed securities. That's almost half of its assets in the most volatile parts of the credit markets. If you do hold these funds, you need to decide if you want this level of exposure to these risky credit markets right now.

In reviewing bond funds this morning, these two Fidelity bond funds were less-diversified than many of its peers. While their yields may be high, you must decide whether the risk is worth it.

Lita Epstein is the author of more than 20 books including the "Pocket Idiot's Guide to Investing in Mutual Funds."