<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Deloitte revenue down, employees up ... mystery behind the numbers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/deloitte-revenue-down-employees-up-mystery-behind-the-numbe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/deloitte-revenue-down-employees-up-mystery-behind-the-numbe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/deloitte-revenue-down-employees-up-mystery-behind-the-numbe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="179" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/dsc02909.jpg" />Brutal economic conditions unsurprisingly hit global accounting giant <a href="http://www.deloitte.com" target="_blank">Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu</a> this year. </p>
<p>The firm reports that revenue for fiscal 2009 (which ended May 31) fell 4.9% from the year before, settling at $26.1 billion. A decline in deal flow and the economic downturn around the world are cited as the primary reasons for the performance. Only the consulting business posted a gain. At the same time, Deloitte's workforce grew globally by 40,000 to 169,000, but the net increase masks a turbulent year for the employees.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/deloitte-revenue-down-employees-up-mystery-behind-the-numbe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deloitte revenue down, employees up ... mystery behind the numbers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/deloitte-revenue-down-employees-up-mystery-behind-the-numbe/">Deloitte revenue down, employees up ... mystery behind the numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/deloitte-revenue-down-employees-up-mystery-behind-the-numbe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19209569/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/deloitte-revenue-down-employees-up-mystery-behind-the-numbe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accounting firm</category><category>auditors</category><category>bearingpoint</category><category>big four</category><category>consulting</category><category>consulting firm</category><category>deloitte</category><category>deloitte touche tohmatsu</category><category>financial advisors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kpmg</category><category>tax</category><category>tax advisers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[KPMG engulfed in subprime accounting scandal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/kpmg-engulfed-in-subprime-accounting-scandal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/kpmg-engulfed-in-subprime-accounting-scandal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/kpmg-engulfed-in-subprime-accounting-scandal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/scales-of-justice.jpg" alt="" />An independent report commissioned by the Justice Department concluded that the "improper and imprudent practices" of now-bankrupt subprime lender <a href="http://www.ncen.com/">New Century Financial</a> were condoned and enabled by the company's independent auditor, KPMG.<br /><br />The accounting firm allowed New Century to change its accounting to report strong profits during the housing boom, when a more conservative treatment would have shown losses. The company lowered its reserves for bad loans that investors were forcing it to buy back, even as the number of bad loans increased.<br /><br /><em>The New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/business/26cnd-account.html?hp">reports</a> that this may pave the way for New Century to sue KPMG. Seven years after the collapse of Enron, conflicts of interest involving "independent" auditors and their clients who pay them are still costing shareholders billions. Back in October, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/are-independent-auditors-tough-enough/">posed 2 ideas</a> for ways that issues of auditor independence might be fixed:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Shouldn't companies be required to change accounting firms (rather than just employees within the same firm) every few years to avoid entrenchment and cozy relationships. When accountants see colleagues leaving for lucrative gigs at the company they once audited, can that lead to a conflict of interest?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Should companies be allowed to choose their own auditors, or should the SEC consider implementing a system where auditors are appointed by a third-party? Allowing companies to hire and fire their own independent auditing firms raises questions about whether they are really independent.</li>
</ul>
With a recent -- and idiotic, I would say -- <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/supreme-court-gives-securities-fraudsters-a-helping-hand/">Supreme Court decision</a> making it tougher for defrauded investors to sue investment banks and auditors who aided and abetted in fraud, auditor independence may be more important than ever.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/kpmg-engulfed-in-subprime-accounting-scandal/">KPMG engulfed in subprime accounting scandal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/business/26cnd-account.html?hp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/kpmg-engulfed-in-subprime-accounting-scandal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1150070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/kpmg-engulfed-in-subprime-accounting-scandal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Accounting</category><category>auditors</category><category>enron</category><category>featured</category><category>Fraud</category><category>New Century</category><category>NewCentury</category><category>scandals</category><category>Subprime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are independent auditors tough enough?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/are-independent-auditors-tough-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/are-independent-auditors-tough-enough/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/are-independent-auditors-tough-enough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>After being embarrassed by the collapses of Enron and Worldcom, the auditing industry appears to be growing a stronger backbone when it comes to dealing with aggressive clients. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119257816857761266.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">According</a> to (subscription required) <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "In recent weeks, the accounting firms, operating through a new industry group, have taken views at odds with at least some of their clients about the use of market prices for hard-to-trade securities and over how banks should deal with their exposure to losses in off-balance-sheet lending vehicles."<br /><br />This is certainly good news. Strong, independent accountants are an absolute necessity in preserving the integrity of the financial system. But more needs to be done. Investors and regulators need to be asking the following questions:<br /><br />
<ul>
    <li>Shouldn't companies be required to change accounting firms (rather than just employees within the same firm) every few years to avoid entrenchment and cozy relationships. When accountants see colleagues leaving for lucrative gigs at the company they once audited, can that lead to a conflict of interest?</li>
    <li>Should companies be allowed to choose their own auditors, or should the SEC consider implementing a system where auditors are appointed by a third-party? Allowing companies to hire and fire their own independent auditing firms raises questions about whether they are really independent.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/are-independent-auditors-tough-enough/">Are independent auditors tough enough?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119257816857761266.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/are-independent-auditors-tough-enough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1015085/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/are-independent-auditors-tough-enough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Accounting</category><category>Auditors</category><category>enron</category><category>worldcom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:14:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
