<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors: For Now, Stand Aside]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/11/general-motors-for-now-stand-aside/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/11/general-motors-for-now-stand-aside/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/11/general-motors-for-now-stand-aside/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="General Motors (GM)"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/gmdealer.jpg" />Time for a second look at General Motors Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-motors-company-common-stock/gm/nys">GM</a>), first discussed in this space <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/19/is-now-a-good-time-to-consider-general-motors/">on November 11, 2010</a>, shortly after its IPO. </p>
<p>And the view remains -- stand aside. </p>
<p>Like most new and/or restructured companies, GM needs to amass at least four, and preferably eight quarters of earnings history under its belt, before one can form a meaningful analysis regarding the company's prospects. Of course, there are exceptions, but these are rare. But GM is not one.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/11/general-motors-for-now-stand-aside/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Motors: For Now, Stand Aside</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/11/general-motors-for-now-stand-aside/">General Motors: For Now, Stand Aside</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/11/general-motors-for-now-stand-aside/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19840764/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/11/general-motors-for-now-stand-aside/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automobile industry</category><category>featured</category><category>general motors</category><category>gm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goodyear Down On Q3 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/goodyear-down-on-q3-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/goodyear-down-on-q3-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/goodyear-down-on-q3-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goodyearblimp.jpg" />The Goodyear Tire &amp; Rubber Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tireandrubber-company/gt/nys">GT</a>) was down big this afternoon. At one point, shares were off by over 9% to a quote of $10.53. The 52-week low for the stock is $9.10; the 52-week high is $16.48. Volume, as you might have guessed, is robust. I would therefore categorize the sentiment in this entity as decidedly bearish.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/the-goodyear-tireandrubber-company/gt/nys/tech-chart">one-year chart</a> hammers home the notion. The downtrend is clearly noticeable. Of course, generally speaking, buying lower is preferable to buying higher. Do the third-quarter numbers give us a reason to seriously consider this name on the pullback?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/goodyear-down-on-q3-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goodyear Down On Q3 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/goodyear-down-on-q3-report/">Goodyear Down On Q3 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/goodyear-loses-20m-in-3q-amid-rubber/595981/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/goodyear-down-on-q3-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19693959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/goodyear-down-on-q3-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automobile industry</category><category>featured</category><category>Goodyear</category><category>GT</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tires</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goodyear May Have Had a Good Q4, but I'm Not Buying]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/goodyear-may-have-had-a-good-q4-but-im-not-buying/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/goodyear-may-have-had-a-good-q4-but-im-not-buying/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/goodyear-may-have-had-a-good-q4-but-im-not-buying/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goodyearblimp.jpg"  alt="" />Goodyear Tire &amp; Rubber (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys">GT</a>) beat the projections on Wall Street this week by a comfortable margin. The call was for a loss of 9 cents per share in the fourth quarter. Would you believe that, on an adjusted basis, Goodyear actually delivered a profit? A profit of 14 cents per share?
<p> </p>
<p>You can check out a summary of the release at <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/goodyear-surprises-analysts-with-fourth-quarter-profit/19361741/"><em>DailyFinance</em></a>. Yeah, it appears as if the analysts were a little bit off this reporting period. Then again, I wouldn't blame them for being pessimistic. Back in October, all indicators pointed to a tough Q4 for the company. The stock was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/is-goodyear-a-good-bet-after-the-q3-report/">hammered at the time</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/goodyear-may-have-had-a-good-q4-but-im-not-buying/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goodyear May Have Had a Good Q4, but I'm Not Buying</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/goodyear-may-have-had-a-good-q4-but-im-not-buying/">Goodyear May Have Had a Good Q4, but I'm Not Buying</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/goodyear-may-have-had-a-good-q4-but-im-not-buying/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19365803/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/goodyear-may-have-had-a-good-q4-but-im-not-buying/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automobile industry</category><category>goodyear</category><category>GT</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tires</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Saab Runs Out of Gas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/saab-runs-out-of-gas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/saab-runs-out-of-gas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/saab-runs-out-of-gas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/saab-logo-240.jpg" />When it comes to selling companies, General Motors has had some bad luck lately. The company pulled its deal for Opel off the market. Then its proposed sale of Saturn failed (the company is in the process of being liquidated).</p>
<p>As for this week, there was another dead deal: the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;sid=avAjPKoFnd9k">sale of Saab</a> to Spyker Cars. And yes, Saab will now be unwound.</p>
<p>What happened here? So far, GM and Spyker have not provided any details. Basically, there were some "issues" that couldn't be resolved.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/saab-runs-out-of-gas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Saab Runs Out of Gas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/saab-runs-out-of-gas/">Saab Runs Out of Gas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/saab-runs-out-of-gas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19287275/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/saab-runs-out-of-gas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automobile industry</category><category>Beijing Automotive Industry Holdings Co</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Koenigsegg</category><category>Saab</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Goodyear a good bet after the Q3 report?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/is-goodyear-a-good-bet-after-the-q3-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/is-goodyear-a-good-bet-after-the-q3-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/is-goodyear-a-good-bet-after-the-q3-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/goodyear_blimp.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys">The Goodyear Tire &amp; Rubber Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys">GT</a>) sold off on Wednesday by nearly 20%. Volume was vastly above average. The third-quarter <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/goodyear-reports-improved-third-quarter-earnings-company-sees-opportunities-as-markets-recover/rfid265123025?channel=pf">earnings release</a> was the culprit. Although, at first glance, you might wonder what the heck is wrong.</p>
<p>Sales were down 15% in Q3 on a year-over-year basis, but they did improve 11% on a sequential basis. The company increased <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/Generally%20Accepted%20Accounting%20Principles%20-%20GAAP">GAAP</a> earnings per share by more than 100% to 30 cents. According to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=ak7AkrAWgjcA">Bloomberg</a>, income was 45 cents per share after items were excluded, five pennies ahead of expectations. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/is-goodyear-a-good-bet-after-the-q3-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Goodyear a good bet after the Q3 report?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/is-goodyear-a-good-bet-after-the-q3-report/">Is Goodyear a good bet after the Q3 report?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=ak7AkrAWgjcA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/is-goodyear-a-good-bet-after-the-q3-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19214334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/is-goodyear-a-good-bet-after-the-q3-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automobile industry</category><category>AutomobileIndustry</category><category>goodyear</category><category>GT</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tires</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Even Toyota (TM) is going to struggle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/toyota-is-not-a-value/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/toyota-is-not-a-value/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/toyota-is-not-a-value/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/toyota-tm-logo.jpg" alt="" />Well, I can't predict when the market will turn, or when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) stock will once again be in favor, but I can tell you that I won't be buying its shares here. According to this <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/toyota-may-miss-us-sales-target/n20080624071409990062">article</a>, Toyota may not do as well as it planned in terms of sales in 2008 in the U.S. market. The company told investors that year-over-year growth in the number of cars sold is now in question. In 2007, Toyota moved 2.62 million automobiles in the U.S., and for 2008, Toyota wanted to sell 2.64 million cars. </p>
<p>I probably don't need to say it, but I will: considering the negative trends in oil futures, gas prices, consumer confidence, inflation, recession potential, and the housing industry, the fact that the stocks of Toyota, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) are having a really tough time right now is not surprising. Toyota's stock closed down 2% on the news of the sales struggle at the end of Tuesday's trading session. That's not a particularly horrible downward move, and the stock is still a few bucks above its 52-week low, but I think there's a chance the stock will take out that low at some point.</p>
<p>Investing in the auto industry might be a dicey move here. Sure, you could pick up some bounces, but being early in this space could prove depressing for even the heartiest investor. Auto sales might get worse before they get better (they're pretty bad now as it is), so I'll stay away from Toyota and this sector.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own any company mentioned here; positions can change at any time. </em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/toyota-is-not-a-value/">Even Toyota (TM) is going to struggle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/toyota-may-miss-us-sales-target/n20080624071409990062>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/toyota-is-not-a-value/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1235875/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/toyota-is-not-a-value/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sales</category><category>automobile industry</category><category>AutomobileIndustry</category><category>automobiles</category><category>AutoSales</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>ConsumerConfidence</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>gas prices</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Good earnings for Goodyear Tire]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/good-earnings-for-goodyear-tire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/good-earnings-for-goodyear-tire/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/good-earnings-for-goodyear-tire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a></p><p>There are some boring businesses out there, and for me, selling tires is one of them. But <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys">Goodyear Tire &amp; Rubber</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys">GT</a>) is having an exciting day today while the major indexes wallow in another bearish posture, at least at the time of this writing. </p>
<p>For the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/goodyear-sets-sales-records-in-fourth/n20080214080009990035">fourth quarter</a>, Goodyear increased its top line by 11% to $5.2 billion (in the previous year's quarter, a three-month strike affected sales to the tune of over $300 million). Net income from continuing operations came in at $0.27 per diluted share, a vast improvement over the $1.74 per-share loss observed in the year-ago period. For the full year, net sales increased 5% to $19.6 billion; net income from continuing operations was $0.65 per diluted share, against a loss in 2006 of $2.11 per diluted share. </p>
<p>Things seem to be going well for Goodyear. The company's cost-savings initiatives are on track, gross margin for the quarter was up, long-term debt and capital leases are down, and cash/equivalents stand at $3.5 billion. The stock is up 5.5% as I write this -- so, what's not to love?</p>
<p>I certainly don't want to rain on a parade here, but Goodyear just isn't my kind of company since it doesn't have a dividend yield at the moment. There are better old-economy ideas out there for me, ones that pay a dividend and seem like better bets. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?dr=12&amp;tabs=quotesandnews">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?dr=12&amp;tabs=quotesandnews">GE</a>) comes to mind (it should, because I own it!). So, bravo to Goodyear for a well-executed period, but I won't be allocating investing dollars toward it; I know it's Valentine's Day and all, but I just don't feel the love. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own shares of GE, and may buy more after this post.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/good-earnings-for-goodyear-tire/">Good earnings for Goodyear Tire</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/goodyear-sets-sales-records-in-fourth/n20080214080009990035>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/good-earnings-for-goodyear-tire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1115351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/good-earnings-for-goodyear-tire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automobile industry</category><category>AutomobileIndustry</category><category>ge</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Goodyear Tire and Rubber</category><category>GoodyearTireAndRubber</category><category>gt</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A closer look at Ford's 2nd quarter earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/a-closer-look-at-fords-2nd-quarter-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/a-closer-look-at-fords-2nd-quarter-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/a-closer-look-at-fords-2nd-quarter-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><p>Here is some background for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/liveblogging-ford-q2-earnings/">Brian White's liveblogging</a> of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Ford</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">F</a>) second quarter earning results:<br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/ford.jpg" alt="" />Ford <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/ford-q2-results-preview/">surprised the market</a> by <a href="http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=26364">announcing black ink</a> for the second quarter of 2007, with net income of $750 million, or $0.31 EPS on $44 billion revenue, which was a 6% increase over 2006 2nd quarter.<br /><br />Unfortunately the increase in revenue was primarily due to currency exchange, mix and net pricing improvements -- sales volume actually was lower than 2006. The profit was due in part to cost reductions of $600 million, including the elimination of 6,400 jobs.<br /><br />Backing out special items, mostly the sale of Aston Martin and deferred gains on certain hedges at Jaguar and Land Rover, and profits finished at $258 million, or $0.13 EPS. The paltry earnings won't do much to excite a market convinced that the company has taken only the first few initial steps in their climb back to economic viability. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/a-closer-look-at-fords-2nd-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A closer look at Ford's 2nd quarter earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/a-closer-look-at-fords-2nd-quarter-earnings/">A closer look at Ford's 2nd quarter earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/a-closer-look-at-fords-2nd-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/949839/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/a-closer-look-at-fords-2nd-quarter-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auston martin</category><category>AustonMartin</category><category>automobile industry</category><category>AutomobileIndustry</category><category>car industry</category><category>car sales</category><category>CarIndustry</category><category>CarSales</category><category>f</category><category>ford</category><category>ford earnings</category><category>FordEarnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jaguar</category><category>land rover</category><category>LandRover</category><category>mazda</category><category>volvo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:41:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
