<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Middle-Income Americans Becoming Frugal Consumers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/middle-income-americans-joining-frugal-consumer-chorus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/middle-income-americans-joining-frugal-consumer-chorus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/middle-income-americans-joining-frugal-consumer-chorus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/target-shoppers-240x160.jpg" />Many investors know about the 'frugal consumer' trend: with incomes stagnant, budget-conscious Americans are find ways to cut expenses, and in some cases eliminating purchases altogether. The above is understandable for any individual/household that's suffered a reduction in income. <br />
<br />
But now it appears that even middle class Americans and/or others with incomes that have not be pinched by the recent recession are ending their free-spending ways, the Associated Press <a href="http:// http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Frugality-among-consumers-is-apf-3355135283.html?x=0">reported Monday</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/middle-income-americans-joining-frugal-consumer-chorus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Middle-Income Americans Becoming Frugal Consumers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/middle-income-americans-joining-frugal-consumer-chorus/">Middle-Income Americans Becoming Frugal Consumers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 May 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/middle-income-americans-joining-frugal-consumer-chorus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19462623/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/middle-income-americans-joining-frugal-consumer-chorus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>featured</category><category>frugal</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Iconix could make Playboy work: Kill the mag, take the sex out of the brand]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/playboy_logo_200.jpg" />Playboy (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys" target="_blank">PLA</a>) tends to be associated with the magazine and sex. Not the hardcore, nasty kind, of course -- Playboy has always been more than a tad distinguished, staying above board while the adult entertainment industry has chosen to compete in ways that my editor would delete if I even attempted. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/" target="_blank">With Iconix said to be interested in acquiring Playboy</a>, it needs to think about where it can win with the ailing brand. The smart move may be to ditch the magazine and move away from sex -- it can't compete in either of these markets. Then, it needs to figure out how to make the brand relevant to everyone not in the Boomer generation ... or treat Playboy as an investment with a clock on it.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Iconix could make Playboy work: Kill the mag, take the sex out of the brand</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/">Iconix could make Playboy work: Kill the mag, take the sex out of the brand</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19249566/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>baby boomers</category><category>boomers</category><category>branding</category><category>brands</category><category>gen x</category><category>gen xers</category><category>gen y</category><category>generation x</category><category>Generation Y</category><category>Gradient Analytics</category><category>hugh hefner</category><category>Hustler</category><category>icon</category><category>iconix</category><category>magazines</category><category>maxim</category><category>penthouse</category><category>playboy</category><category>virginia commonwealth</category><category>vivid</category><category>vivid entertainment</category><category>wicked</category><category>Wicked Pictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What will happen if Baby Boomers retire with 401Ks that look like 201Ks?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/what-will-happen-if-baby-boomers-retire-with-401ks-that-look-lik/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/what-will-happen-if-baby-boomers-retire-with-401ks-that-look-lik/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/what-will-happen-if-baby-boomers-retire-with-401ks-that-look-lik/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/princeton.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Academics, being a privileged and rarefied lot, almost by second nature consistently look down the field. <br /><br />Hey, it's what one is supposed to do when one has lifetime job security and is freed of many of the burdens that occupy most others in the American workforce. <br /><br />For the above reasons, and others, academics tend to see things others don't. Case in point: the slumping stock market, the U.S. recession, and decidedly less-cash-flush credit markets.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/what-will-happen-if-baby-boomers-retire-with-401ks-that-look-lik/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What will happen if Baby Boomers retire with 401Ks that look like 201Ks?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/what-will-happen-if-baby-boomers-retire-with-401ks-that-look-lik/">What will happen if Baby Boomers retire with 401Ks that look like 201Ks?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/what-will-happen-if-baby-boomers-retire-with-401ks-that-look-lik/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19094540/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/what-will-happen-if-baby-boomers-retire-with-401ks-that-look-lik/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>401K</category><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>featured</category><category>retirement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Entrepreneur's Journal: What are the growth businesses today?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/entrepreneur-s-journal-what-are-the-growth-businesses-today/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/entrepreneur-s-journal-what-are-the-growth-businesses-today/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/entrepreneur-s-journal-what-are-the-growth-businesses-today/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/ibisworld.jpg" />With the chances of finding a job fairly slim, people are certainly thinking about starting -- or even buying -- a business. But, which industry to go into?</p>
<p>It's a tough decision. Yet, there are still opportunities. To get some insight on this, I had a chance to talk to Toon van Beeck, who is the senior analyst with <a href="http://www.ibisworld.com/">IBISWorld</a>. Let's take a look:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/entrepreneur-s-journal-what-are-the-growth-businesses-today/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entrepreneur's Journal: What are the growth businesses today?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/entrepreneur-s-journal-what-are-the-growth-businesses-today/">Entrepreneur's Journal: What are the growth businesses today?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/entrepreneur-s-journal-what-are-the-growth-businesses-today/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19070455/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/entrepreneur-s-journal-what-are-the-growth-businesses-today/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>career services</category><category>education</category><category>IBISWorld</category><category>repair services</category><category>Toon van Beeck</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Social Security will run out of money... in the year 2525]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/social-security-will-run-out-of-money-in-the-year-2525/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/social-security-will-run-out-of-money-in-the-year-2525/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/social-security-will-run-out-of-money-in-the-year-2525/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" />Sometimes the most basic of problems -- ones where the solution is fairly simple -- linger for decades in Washington, primarily for protection of status quo reasons. <br /><br />A good example is Social Security -- the huge, bedrock entitlement program, often portrayed as facing a dire circumstance, when, in fact, as former U.S. Labor Department Secretary and current Berkeley Professor Robert Reich pointed out, the solution is fairly basic. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/social-security-will-run-out-of-money-in-the-year-2525/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Social Security will run out of money... in the year 2525</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/social-security-will-run-out-of-money-in-the-year-2525/">Social Security will run out of money... in the year 2525</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/social-security-will-run-out-of-money-in-the-year-2525/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19063782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/social-security-will-run-out-of-money-in-the-year-2525/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>featured</category><category>Robert Reich</category><category>Social Security</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will the U.S. economy's focus shift from consumption to production?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/will-the-u-s-economys-focus-shift-from-consumption-to-producti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/will-the-u-s-economys-focus-shift-from-consumption-to-producti/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/will-the-u-s-economys-focus-shift-from-consumption-to-producti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/factory.jpg" alt="" />It's an axiom of business theory that change is continual in market economies, but as economist David H. Wang points out, there's change that corporations and citizens can prepare for, and then there's change that few expect. <br /><br />The latter is, by its nature, Wang says, more disruptive - - driving companies out of business, compelling triage-like changes in business models of others, while also triggering wholesale changes to family budgets, career paths, and students' educational objectives. <br /><br />Wang groups change in three categories: <span style="font-style: italic;">cyclical</span> (as in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_cycle">business cycle</a>), <span style="font-style: italic;">technological</span> (such as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet">Internet</a>, car, telephone, electrification, railroad etc.), and <span style="font-style: italic;">structural</span> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization">globalization,</a> Cold War, Marshall Plan, Bolshevik Revolution, the Enlightenment, Protestant Reformation, etc).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/will-the-u-s-economys-focus-shift-from-consumption-to-producti/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will the U.S. economy's focus shift from consumption to production?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/will-the-u-s-economys-focus-shift-from-consumption-to-producti/">Will the U.S. economy's focus shift from consumption to production?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/will-the-u-s-economys-focus-shift-from-consumption-to-producti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1450026/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/will-the-u-s-economys-focus-shift-from-consumption-to-producti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>globalization</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>median incomes</category><category>sbux</category><category>trade</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where have all the consumers gone?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/where-have-all-the-consumers-gone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/where-have-all-the-consumers-gone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/where-have-all-the-consumers-gone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shopping_carts_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />A journalism professor of yours truly, Jon Sandberg, who also served in key positions for several Connecticut governors, had an interesting technique that he frequently deployed in seminars. A student would pose a question and Sandberg would say, "That's a good question. Is it acceptable and ethical to publish information that you know would show ethical and other lapses by the current president, if you know that information would also harm innocent individuals? <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">That's a good question."</span><br /><br />Then Sandberg would grab his cup of coffee and walk to the window side of the classroom, and stare out the window, sipping his coffee, saying nothing, for an eternity. Eventually, a student or two would begin the discussion. <br /><br />What's a good question for today? Maybe this: where have all the consumers gone <a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html#Econ">in the U.S. economy?</a> BloggingStocks had a chance to grill economist Peter Dawson on the matter, and he has a few theories. <br /><br />The first concerns <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">structural and technological factors</span>, he said. The U.S. is in the midst of adjusting to globalization, which, as most investors know, has resulted in the transfer of millions of good-paying U.S. jobs overseas to lower-cost centers. "The U.S. has also gained some jobs from globalization, but the net is still a major loss of good-paying jobs in the United States," Dawson said. "Some economists argue that's at the root of declining consumption. We are net-negative in the good-paying jobs category, so far, in globalization, and there simply aren't enough citizens with incomes adequate to buy the products."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/where-have-all-the-consumers-gone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Where have all the consumers gone?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/where-have-all-the-consumers-gone/">Where have all the consumers gone?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/where-have-all-the-consumers-gone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1388699/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/where-have-all-the-consumers-gone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>globalization</category><category>median incomes</category><category>retail sales</category><category>revenue</category><category>savings rate</category><category>senior citizens</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bet on T&amp;A with J&amp;J (JNJ)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/bet-on-tanda-with-jandj-jnj/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/bet-on-tanda-with-jandj-jnj/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/bet-on-tanda-with-jandj-jnj/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/bikini.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Over the long holiday weekend, I had a chance to do some much needed reading. Given my vocation, sometimes I like to read articles that have little to do with the markets or finance as a way of recharging my batteries.</p>
<p>Of course, even when I partake in this guilty pleasure, there really is no way to truly escape. Somehow every story has a link or relationship to investing that I can utilize in <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/gallery/top-10-stocks-for-2009.html">my stock-picking mission</a>.</p>
<p>This weekend, it was an <a href="http://music.msn.com/music/celebrityfeature/celebrity-bikini-shots/?GT1=BUZZ1">article</a> critical of a Shape magazine cover featuring a bikini-clad Faith Hill that has import for individual investors. In this particular article, the author does a really great job of highlighting the battle of fitness versus self-image.</p>
<p>How exactly did the 41-year-old country singer get that body? Was it photoshopped? How about plastic surgery? Is it really fair to present her in that way without the caveats, if any? The image alone implies that this woman, a busy professional with young children, managed to eat right and exercise in a way that created the image you now see on the magazine -- and that you can achieve yourself.</p>
<p>Wow, what pressure. The problem, of course, is that Photoshop was probably used in this instance, and if not Photoshop, then plastic surgery for certain.</p>
<p>So what does this have to do with investing?</p>
<p>This morning I awoke to the news that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) announced a definitive agreement to purchase <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mentor-corporation-minn/mnt/nys">Mentor</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mentor-corporation-minn/mnt/nys">MNT</a>), a leading supplier of medical products for the global aesthetic market -- namely, breast implants.</p>
<p>JNJ is paying $31 per share, or $1.07 billion in cash, for the company. The purchase price is about double what MNT fetched in the open market on Friday.</p>
<p>A premium price of that magnitude <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/gallery/top-10-stocks-for-2009.html">in this market environment</a> is hard to believe, but I would not bet against JNJ here. They have their pulse on the market and a copy of Shape magazine on their desk. As the baby-boomer generation ages, plastic surgery looks to be a huge market. Fueled by images like those in Shape magazine, the market is more than worthy of a premium price.</p>
<p>The fact that MNT was valued at the purchase price as recently as June is telling. Yes, the economy is in recession, but the desire to improve self image is alive and well.</p>
<p>This is a brilliant deal for JNJ. The company enters a strong market with great demographics at a time of economic weakness. Taking advantage of a strong balance sheet and rich cash flow, JNJ is a winner in this economy.</p>
<p>Self-image issues aside, I like this deal.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/bio.html">Jamie Dlugosch</a> is a contributor to <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/gallery/top-10-stocks-for-2009.html">InvestorPlace.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/bet-on-tanda-with-jandj-jnj/">Bet on T&amp;A with J&amp;J (JNJ)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/bet-on-tanda-with-jandj-jnj/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1387618/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/bet-on-tanda-with-jandj-jnj/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>BabyBoomers</category><category>breast implants</category><category>BreastImplants</category><category>featured</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Mentor</category><category>Mentor Corp</category><category>MentorCorp</category><category>MNT</category><category>plastic surgery</category><category>PlasticSurgery</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Company nicknames: NBC's peacock stands for much more than just 'living color']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/company-nicknames-nbcs-peacock-stands-for-much-more-than-just/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/company-nicknames-nbcs-peacock-stands-for-much-more-than-just/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/company-nicknames-nbcs-peacock-stands-for-much-more-than-just/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-nbc-200cs080708.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is one in a series on prominent <strong>company nicknames</strong>. <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/company-nicknames">See all 25</a></strong>, and share your thoughts and memories about the <strong>Peacock Network </strong>below in the comments.</em></p>
<p>Perhaps more visually recognizable than any other television symbol today, NBC's colorful peacock logo and nickname encompass far more depth and history than simply having been a tool of recognition for NBC Television, subsidiary of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>). Beyond simply identifying network programs in the age when NBC and CBS began applying the color palette to broadcast television, NBC's peacock was charged with the awesome task of informing and convincing the parents of the baby boomer generation that color television had arrived, it was good, and they wanted it. The peacock was assigned <a href="http://www.big13.net/NBC%20Peacock/NBCPeacock1.htm">the monumental task of engaging the public</a>. Indeed, it has performed that job to perfection.</p>
<p>I grew up fully addicted to television, and NBC's peacock long heralded the appearance of many of my favorite shows. <em>Bonanza</em>, NBC's first serious success in color broadcast television, was a weekly treat for me, as it was for millions of other enchanted TV viewers. Accordingly, by the time color television promotion had begun to move consumers to purchase the new color television sets, which sold for approximately $1,000 initially, the NBC peacock, which had begun its glorious life as a simple static image, learned how to fan its tail feathers in a motion indicative of the sweeping changes the television age would come to initiate.</p>
<p>Until man orbited the earth, television was perhaps the single greatest technological achievement since Henry Ford had put automobiles into mass production. Since the coming of color television in 1956, the NBC peacock has been<a href="http://www.classicthemes.com/50sTVThemes/themePages/nbcLivingColor.html"> a television communications fixture</a>, and NBC television is respectfully referred to as "The Peacock Network" by people and publications throughout the industry. It can be said that very few other company logos have stood as representative for changes that have affected so many people, so very deeply, for such a long time.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/company-nicknames-nbcs-peacock-stands-for-much-more-than-just/">Company nicknames: NBC's peacock stands for much more than just 'living color'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/company-nicknames-nbcs-peacock-stands-for-much-more-than-just/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1271556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/company-nicknames-nbcs-peacock-stands-for-much-more-than-just/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>Bonanza</category><category>broadcast television</category><category>color television</category><category>company nicknames</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>logos</category><category>NBC</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>peacock</category><category>peacock network</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Housing sector slump seen decreasing some Baby Boomers' nest eggs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Baby Boomers, in some cases already facing the 'double demands' of caring for kids and aging parents, have another economic concern, at least for the next phase of the housing cycle: substantially lower household net worth, as a result of declining home prices, so says a Washington-based think tank.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.cepr.net/index.php/press-releases/press-releases/baby-boomers-face-massive-loss-of-retirement-wealth-due-to-housing-market-meltdown/">Center for Economic and Policy Research says</a> the median households head by those ages 45-54 in 2009 will have about 25% less wealth than the similar demographic in 2004. In dollars, household wealth will decline to $113,268 from $150,113.<br /><br />Further, the above assume March 2008's housing prices hold for 2009: if they don't and prices fall another 10%, household net worth declines by about 35%; 20%, by about 45%, <a href="http://www.cepr.net/index.php/press-releases/press-releases/baby-boomers-face-massive-loss-of-retirement-wealth-due-to-housing-market-meltdown/">the CEPR said.</a> <br /><br />Economist Peter Dawson, who is not affiliated with the CEPR or the study, told BloggingStocks part of the problem was "unreasonable expectations regarding home appreciation rates, the belief that 10-15% real estate gains would continue for decades. It got too many adults out of the traditional saving and investing mode and into thinking their home would serve as a major return on investment." Most homes do appreciate, and they can help build wealth, Dawson said, but homeowners must think in terms of a 6-9% average, annual appreciation rate, "which is a more-realistic return for residential dwellings."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Housing sector slump seen decreasing some Baby Boomers' nest eggs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/">Housing sector slump seen decreasing some Baby Boomers' nest eggs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1237025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>assets</category><category>baby boomers</category><category>bonds</category><category>Center for Economic and Policy Researc</category><category>estates</category><category>housing</category><category>housing sector</category><category>inthenews</category><category>median home prices</category><category>Medicare</category><category>personal finance</category><category>Social Security</category><category>stocks</category><category>wealth management</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Small business still powering]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/27/small-business-still-powering/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/27/small-business-still-powering/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/27/small-business-still-powering/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/kauffman.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />No doubt, small businesses are a powerful force in the U.S. economy in terms of job creation and innovation. And, according to a recent study from the <a href="http://www.kauffman.org">Kauffman Foundation</a>, it looks like <a href="http://www.kauffman.org/items.cfm?itemID=1036">things are still going strong, despite the slowing economy</a>. For example, every month, about 500,000 new businesses are started (of course, there are certainly a good number that fail as well).</p>
<p>So, what are some of the key trends? Well, interestingly enough, there is quite a bit of growth from immigrants. In fact, they are more likely to start businesses than native-born Americans.</p>
<p>Something else: men are twice as likely to start a business then women. Actually, I think this is unfortunate because diversity certainly allows for stronger growth.</p>
<p>However, looking at the next decade or so, I suspect we'll see much more entrepreneurial activity. Why? It's when the Baby Boomers will reach their prime years for new business formation. They will have the wisdom and resources to take a flier. What's more, a new business may actually became an interesting way for Baby Boomers to essentially change the definition of "retirement" -- that is, leaving the rat race and doing what they really want.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including</em> The Complete M&amp;A Handbook <em>(</em><a href="http://www.mergerbook.com"><em>www.mergerbook.com</em></a><em>) and is also a principal in </em><a href="http://www.averiware.com/"><em>Averiware</em></a><em>, which provides an ERP system to small and mid-size businesses.</em></p>
<p><em></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/27/small-business-still-powering/">Small business still powering</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/27/small-business-still-powering/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1178832/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/27/small-business-still-powering/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>business start-ups</category><category>immigrants</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kauffman Foundation</category><category>small business</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The economics of Social Security, Medicare, and you]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />With a sluggish economy, uncertain job growth, the most serious housing recession in more than 20 years, record oil and gasoline prices, ramping food costs, and a foreign policy landscape that's challenging (to say the least), decision makers in the United States, public and private, have more than enough to be concerned about, near-term, most analysts and citizens would agree. <br /><br />Still, the above wasn't enough to prevent the annual "alarm sounding" about long-term concerns, such as Social Security and Medicare, the likes of which occurred again this week when the <a href="http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/TR08/VI_LRact_bal.html#102806">Social Security Trustees released their revised 2008 actuarial balance</a>, which is a status report. <br /><br />Moreover, while it's never prudent to ignore the tax and benefits implications of entitlement programs as large as <a href="http://www.ssa.gov/">Social Security</a> and <a href="http://www.medicare.gov/">Medicare,</a> it's important that investors and taxpayers also keep in mind one undeniable reality pertaining to statistical analysis of this sort. Namely, that we're dealing with longitudinal projections stretching out decades in which -- if any one of 20 variables (or more) change -- receipts and outlays would change substantially.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The economics of Social Security, Medicare, and you</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/">The economics of Social Security, Medicare, and you</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1150011/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boom</category><category>Baby Boom generation</category><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>entitlements</category><category>featured</category><category>GDP</category><category>health care</category><category>immigration</category><category>Medicare</category><category>payroll taxes</category><category>pensions</category><category>senior citizens</category><category>Social Security</category><category>Social Security Administration</category><category>taxes</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are U.S. consumers moving away from buying on credit?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p>American consumers, the pivotal factor in the consumer-dependent U.S. economy, may have modified their spending philosophy, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/business/05spend.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin"><em>The New York Times</em> reported Tuesday</a>.
<p>Stung by the housing market correction, stagnant wage growth in certain job segments, above-average debt levels, and a slowing economy, Americans are saving more and using credit less -- a shift that some analysts argue is a cultural inflection point of sorts, with huge implications for the economy.<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/business/05spend.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin"> </a></p>
<p>Economist Steve Affinito told BloggingStocks Tuesday that while <em>The Times</em>' interpretative report did not "cite a large enough sample size to meet my fancy," it nonetheless provided data points that support what macroeconomic indicators are saying about consumer choices. </p>
<p>"We know that the savings rate has increased in the last six months, and retail sales are sluggish, at best. Take these and combine them with much tighter credit terms for home equity loans and other credit and what you get is a pull back in purchases, particularly purchases on credit," Affinito said. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are U.S. consumers moving away from buying on credit?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/">Are U.S. consumers moving away from buying on credit?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1107445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>consumer debt</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>credit</category><category>credit cards</category><category>home equity loans</category><category>inthenews</category><category>savings</category><category>savings rate</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The search for income for retirees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/27/the-seach-for-income-for-retirees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/27/the-seach-for-income-for-retirees/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/27/the-seach-for-income-for-retirees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>With treasury yields well below 4%, and even decent corporate paper not yielding much better, the question I keep hearing from my elderly clients who live off of their investment income is where are they going to get the income needed to meet their expenses. Thrown into the mix that, in four years million and millions of baby boomers are set to retire, so they will also need to start adjusting their portfolios to be more income oriented. I anticipate that we will see continued demand for high-rated bonds and, as such, I can't imagine that we will see yields back above 6% on good corporates.</p>
<p>What to do? The answer to that question is more involved than this space permits, but take a look at preferred stock to help supplement income. My buddy, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/06/looking-for-yield-amongst-the-rubble-a-preferred-stocks-etf/">Zack Miller had a nice post</a> about this a while back. The problem with preferred stocks is that it's hard to get information on each issue and the terms of the issue. Also, liquidity can be an issue. That's why I like the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-financial-preferred-portfolio/pgf/ase">POWERSHARES ETF TRUST</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-financial-preferred-portfolio/pgf/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">PGF</a>). The ETF is well diversified as it holds about 28 issues. More important is that it is yielding a shade under 7%. With preferreds having been slammed over the last few months, there may be some opportunity for some capital gains as well.</p>
<p>Living off fixed income? Check out preferred stocks.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">IsraelNewsletter.com</font></em></a><em>. DISCLOSURE: Writer has a position and is long PGF. He has no positions in any stock mentioned as of 1/27/08</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/27/the-seach-for-income-for-retirees/">The search for income for retirees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/27/the-seach-for-income-for-retirees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1098270/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/27/the-seach-for-income-for-retirees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>ETFs</category><category>exhange traded trusts</category><category>fixed income</category><category>IsraelNewsletter.com</category><category>pgf</category><category>Powershares ETF Trust</category><category>PowersharesEtfTrust</category><category>preferred stocks</category><category>Zack Miller</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Demographic, education trends are in Hologic's (HOLX) favor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/demographic-education-trends-are-in-hologics-holx-favor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/demographic-education-trends-are-in-hologics-holx-favor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/demographic-education-trends-are-in-hologics-holx-favor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>In a choppy/consolidating (or perhaps worse) market, discretion dictates that one look for companies where the demographics are running in the company's favor. Health care services in the United States is one sector, and in this category Hologic is worth an evaluation.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hologic-inc/holx/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Hologic</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hologic-inc/holx/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">HOLX</a>) manufactures mammography tests/products, workstations, and detection systems, as well as cervical cancer screening systems, among other health care service business lines.<br /><br />Analysts see solid-to-robust growth for HOLX on favorable demographic trends and increased health education awareness to undergo regular, as-required tests for the conditions HOLX screens. Margins remain solid in both the breast cancer and cervical cancer detection areas, with promising opportunities to increase market share. <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp?symbol=holx">The Reuters F2007/F2008 EPS consensus estimates</a> for HOLX are $1.69/$2.25. <br /><br />The risks: Negative changes to Medicare and/or private insurer reimbursement rates would hurt HOLX's results, if clinics consequently reduce tests with machines/devices manufactured by HOLX. Analysts also are monitoring intensifying competition across HOLX's revenue streams.<br /><br />The First Call mean rating for HOLX is: Buy. [13 firms.] Mean 2008 target: $73.00. [high: $77, low: $65.]<br /><br /><strong>Stock Analysis: </strong>Hologic is a moderate-risk stock not suitable for low-risk investors. Investors with an investment horizon longer than two years should be rewarded from HOLX's shares. Sell / Stop Loss if you were to purchase shares in this company: $42.<br /><br /><em>DISCLOSURE: Joseph Lazzaro has no positions in stocks. In addition to private real estate holdings, he owns corporate and municipal bonds, and cash certificates of deposit.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/demographic-education-trends-are-in-hologics-holx-favor/">Demographic, education trends are in Hologic's (HOLX) favor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/demographic-education-trends-are-in-hologics-holx-favor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1077158/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/demographic-education-trends-are-in-hologics-holx-favor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boom generation</category><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>CancerScreening</category><category>CancerTests</category><category>health care</category><category>Hologic</category><category>HOLX</category><category>medical tests</category><category>MedicalServices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nordstrom: A retail play for the bold investor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/nordstrom-a-retail-play-for-the-bold-investor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/nordstrom-a-retail-play-for-the-bold-investor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/nordstrom-a-retail-play-for-the-bold-investor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jwn/" rel="tag">Nordstrom, Inc (JWN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/logo_nordstrom.jpg" />Now is definitely not the time to think about retail sector investments. Soaring oil and gasoline prices, uncertainty regarding the size of the subprime mortgage default problem, and concerns about a slowing U.S. economy don't exactly flash the "SPEND" signal for consumers this holiday season. </p>
<p>Even so, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Nordstrom Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">JWN</a>) may buck the trend, or perform well despite the headwinds, to use a Wall Street phrase. </p>
<p>The case for buying Nordstrom rests on the company's increasing market share, solid balance sheet and cash flow, all driven by the Nordstrom brand. Over the last decade, Nordstrom has established itself at the leading upscale department store. Most retailers would love to have Nordstrom's combination of brand reputation, Baby Boomer appeal, and consistent shopping experience across store departments.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/nordstrom-a-retail-play-for-the-bold-investor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nordstrom: A retail play for the bold investor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/nordstrom-a-retail-play-for-the-bold-investor/">Nordstrom: A retail play for the bold investor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/nordstrom-a-retail-play-for-the-bold-investor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1037802/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/nordstrom-a-retail-play-for-the-bold-investor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>department stores</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>JWN</category><category>Nordstrom</category><category>retail sales</category><category>retail sector</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>upscale department stores</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will baby boomers bankrupt social security?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/will-baby-boomers-bankrupt-social-security/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/will-baby-boomers-bankrupt-social-security/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/will-baby-boomers-bankrupt-social-security/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><em><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/social-security-hits-first-wave-of/20071015142509990001">USA Today</a></em> reports that at age 62, America's first baby boomer opted into Social Security today. The question for America is whether the 80 million people born between 1946 and 1964 will bankrupt Social Security by the time all of them are receiving their payments. </p>
<p>The caseload for so-called entitlements -- Social Security and Medicare -- is going to explode in the next 23 years. By 2030, Social Security's caseload will be 84 million people, up from 50 million today. Medicare will go from 44 million beneficiaries to 79 million. That will leave about two workers paying payroll taxes for every retiree. The tab is estimated at $50 trillion in future obligations over the next 75 years. Social Security will rise from 4% to 6% of the GDP, and Medicare will go from 3% to 11%. </p>
<p>The options are not good. Fixing Social Security solely with higher taxes or cuts in spending would mean a 16% increase in the payroll tax or a 13% cut in benefits. Medicare's needs would be far greater: a 122% payroll tax hike or a 51% reduction in spending, just for hospital care. Unfortunately, the longer we wait to fix the problem, the more it will cost.</p>
<p>However, if history is any guide, we'll wait until a crisis before we find the will to act. And that crisis will fall on the shoulders of the baby boomers' children and grandchildren -- not much of a legacy.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. </em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/will-baby-boomers-bankrupt-social-security/">Will baby boomers bankrupt social security?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/will-baby-boomers-bankrupt-social-security/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1013697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/will-baby-boomers-bankrupt-social-security/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>BabyBoomers</category><category>benefits</category><category>government</category><category>inthenews</category><category>medicare</category><category>retirement</category><category>social security</category><category>SocialSecurity</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Will Harley-Davidson (HOG) fade like Levi Strauss?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/chasing-value-will-harley-davidson-hog-fade-like-levi-strauss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/chasing-value-will-harley-davidson-hog-fade-like-levi-strauss/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/chasing-value-will-harley-davidson-hog-fade-like-levi-strauss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/harley_-just-jen-.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Yesterday I posted <a title="View Chasing Value: Harley-Davidson (HOG) looking on down the road on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/20/chasing-value-harley-davidson-hog-looking-on-down-the-road/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">Chasing Value: Harley-Davidson (HOG) looking on down the road</font></a> and actually bought a few shares. Late in the day I received a comment from one of our frequent readers whose opinions I have grown to respect, although he can be a little harsh at times. This reader raised some interesting points I thought worth some consideration. He wrote:</p>
<ul>
    <li>"I don't like the stock. I see it as a luxury item for aging Baby Boomers. The ones who always wanted one, (or who) already own one. The younger generations aren't interested. I also think you're making a classic mistake when you speculate by saying "if it returns to its former level within the next few years." </li>
</ul>
<p>He is correct that there is no assurance a stock will return to past glory. It is entirely possible that a company may fade away, just like Levi Strauss did when competitors stormed its castle from all sides with cheaper products, fancier products, variations on a theme and jeans made by other strong brands that extended their product lines into Levi's historic stronghold.</p>
<p>Similar things are happening now to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/harley-davidson-inc/hog/nys/detailedquotes?freq=1">Harley-Davidson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/harley-davidson-inc/hog/nys/detailedquotes?freq=1">HOG</a>) as Honda Motors, Yamaha, Kowasaki and Suzuki take on "style and look" of the classic American "HOG" ride. They do it cheaper, with less effort and even borrow American icons like eagles and flags to promote their machines. They also offer a smoother ride in many cases, as Harley clings to the past and continues producing motorcycles with what it calls "edgy" (read "rough") rides. It is also true that younger motorcycle enthusiasts do not appreciate the Harley mystique in the same way as Baby Boomers have.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/chasing-value-will-harley-davidson-hog-fade-like-levi-strauss/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Will Harley-Davidson (HOG) fade like Levi Strauss?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/chasing-value-will-harley-davidson-hog-fade-like-levi-strauss/">Chasing Value: Will Harley-Davidson (HOG) fade like Levi Strauss?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/20/chasing-value-harley-davidson-hog-looking-on-down-the-road/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/chasing-value-will-harley-davidson-hog-fade-like-levi-strauss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/995268/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/chasing-value-will-harley-davidson-hog-fade-like-levi-strauss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>BabyBoomers</category><category>China</category><category>Eastern Europe</category><category>EasternEurope</category><category>Energy conservation</category><category>EnergyConservation</category><category>foreign markets</category><category>ForeignMarkets</category><category>Harley-Davidson (HOG)</category><category>Harley-davidson(hog)</category><category>HOG</category><category>India</category><category>Levi Stauss</category><category>Levi's</category><category>LeviStauss</category><category>Motorcycles</category><category>Russia</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>traffic congestion</category><category>TrafficCongestion</category><category>Ukraine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[They don't wanna retire ... they just wanna work at their jobs all day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/05/they-dont-wanna-retire-they-just-wanna-work-at-their-jobs-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/05/they-dont-wanna-retire-they-just-wanna-work-at-their-jobs-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/05/they-dont-wanna-retire-they-just-wanna-work-at-their-jobs-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>Last week I reported on a new study suggesting that around a third of baby boomers <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/baby-boomers-need-more-money-for-retirement/">don't have enough in savings</a> to maintain their current standard of living in retirement. While I certainly think people need to save more money, I wasn't panicking yet. I wrote that, "Rather than seeking Florida retirement communities and golf courses, the senior citizens of the future may work longer, often on projects that have a social element. Remember, this is the group of people that brought us Woodstock and the Vietnam War protests -- I don't see them sitting by the beach."</p>
<p>MarketWatch's Marshall Loeb has a good piece on <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/appeal-early-retirement-fades-industries/story.aspx?guid=%7BA491E4AF%2D185E%2D4F65%2D9449%2DB5D3F470A7AA%7D">this very same issue</a>. He starts with a nice quote from Jack Welch: "People don't want to sit on the beach just because they've hit 70. They're too vibrant. They want action: 70 is the new 55."</p>
<p>Loeb writes that "The appeal of early retirement is fading, and more and more folks are willing -- even eager -- to work beyond some mythic date. A record 24.6 million Americans age 55 and above are on the job."</p>
<p>Age discrimination is on the decline and so are "mandatory retirement ages" for certain companies and occupations.</p>
<p>This is great news for everyone: Older workers have a lot to teach younger workers, and working, at least part-time, late into life will likely slow mental deterioration (just like <a href="http://www.helpstartshere.org/seniors_and_aging/alzheimers_disease/dementia/real_life_stories/alzheimers_disease_-_real_life_story.html">playing bridge</a> does).</p>
<p>So let's not weep too much for the baby boomers. Many may not have enough to retire at 65, but that could work out just fine for them -- and society at large.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/05/they-dont-wanna-retire-they-just-wanna-work-at-their-jobs-a/">They don't wanna retire ... they just wanna work at their jobs all day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 05 Aug 2007 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/05/they-dont-wanna-retire-they-just-wanna-work-at-their-jobs-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/958082/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/05/they-dont-wanna-retire-they-just-wanna-work-at-their-jobs-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>BabyBoomers</category><category>early retirement</category><category>EarlyRetirement</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>mandatory retirement</category><category>Marshall Loeb</category><category>MarshallLoeb</category><category>older workers</category><category>OlderWorkers</category><category>playing bridge</category><category>PlayingBridge</category><category>retirement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Baby Boomers need more money for retirement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/baby-boomers-need-more-money-for-retirement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/baby-boomers-need-more-money-for-retirement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/baby-boomers-need-more-money-for-retirement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>Here's a shocker: baby boomers don't have enough money for retirement. An <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/1310AP_Boomers_Savings.html">Associated Press piece reports</a> that "Nearly one-third of baby boomers ages 51 to 61 are at risk of not having enough in savings to finance a comfortable retirement, according to a study being released Tuesday by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College."</p>
<p>This piece seems like the most believable of the recent studies on this topic that have come out. One actually suggested that people were saving too much, which reminded me of an old newspaper clipping I saw on the 'Headlines' segment of Jay Leno's <em>Tonight Show: </em>"Newspapers look for ways to deliver mail more slowly." I don't really see how anyone can argue that Americans are saving too much money. Pick up a copy of <em>Maxed Out</em> if you need convincing. Why would people who are saving too much money have so much debt?</p>
<p>The saving grace here may be that baby boomers are likely to retire in a way that is dramatically different from the way their parents did. Rather than seeking Florida retirement communities and golf courses, the senior citizens of the future may work longer, often on projects that have a social element -- Remember, this is the group of people that brought us Woodstock and the Vietnam War protests: I don't see them sitting by the beach.</p>
<p>My hunch is that medical advances will allow older people to be more active longer, and that we won't end up with too much of a retirement crisis.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/baby-boomers-need-more-money-for-retirement/">Baby Boomers need more money for retirement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/1310AP_Boomers_Savings.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/baby-boomers-need-more-money-for-retirement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/954138/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/baby-boomers-need-more-money-for-retirement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby boomers</category><category>BabyBoomers</category><category>retirement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
