<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Bloggingstockcast: Backdated stock options back in the news as some sentences handed down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/bloggingstockcast-backdated-stock-options-back-in-the-news-as-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/bloggingstockcast-backdated-stock-options-back-in-the-news-as-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/bloggingstockcast-backdated-stock-options-back-in-the-news-as-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a></p><center><object width="415" height="347"><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="movie" value="http://uncutvideo.aol.com/v6.409/en-US/uc_videoplayer.swf" /><param name="FlashVars" value="aID=115ffb87513a89f40dd037ee5601704a5&amp;site=http://uncutvideo.aol.com/"/><embed src="http://uncutvideo.aol.com/v6.409/en-US/uc_videoplayer.swf" wmode="opaque" FlashVars="aID=115ffb87513a89f40dd037ee5601704a5&amp;site=http://uncutvideo.aol.com/" width="415" height="347" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></center><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/bloggingstockcast-backdated-stock-options-back-in-the-news-as-s/">Bloggingstockcast: Backdated stock options back in the news as some sentences handed down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/bloggingstockcast-backdated-stock-options-back-in-the-news-as-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1090868/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/bloggingstockcast-backdated-stock-options-back-in-the-news-as-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>backdated stock options</category><category>BackdatedStockOptions</category><category>bloggingstockcast</category><category>stock options scandal</category><category>StockOptionsScandal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple avoids NASDAQ delisting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/apple-avoids-nasdaq-delisting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/apple-avoids-nasdaq-delisting/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/apple-avoids-nasdaq-delisting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>Last Friday the NASDAQ stated that it wouldn't delist Apple Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL), pending a timely 10Q filing within the next two months. A number of observers had worried that Apple would be delisted as a result of the backdated stock options scandal. Being delisted would have had a deeply negative effect on the stock, even despite the great string of news the companies has had of late related to sales.<br /><br />No doubt Apple's success of late lead to the NASDAQ's unwillingness to delist. Apple is a bit of a star company. It's much easier to kick a company once it is down, but while there is still some shine the NASDAQ will keep a wait and see attitude going on.<br /><br />Apple ended the day up a single penny or 0.01%, to finish at $80.42.<br /><br /><em>Tobias Buckell is an <a href="http://www.tobiasbuckell.com">author</a>, freelancer, and professional blogger. He does not currently own Apple stock.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/apple-avoids-nasdaq-delisting/">Apple avoids NASDAQ delisting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.macobserver.com/stockwatch/2006/10/27.1.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/apple-avoids-nasdaq-delisting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/693439/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/apple-avoids-nasdaq-delisting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>backdated stock options</category><category>BackdatedStockOptions</category><category>delisting</category><category>NASDAQ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 10/11/06: options issues spread further]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/apple-after-the-bell-10-11-06-options-issues-spread-further/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/apple-after-the-bell-10-11-06-options-issues-spread-further/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/apple-after-the-bell-10-11-06-options-issues-spread-further/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/snipshot_142ldp0m8r.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Apple Computer, Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL) ended the day down 58 cents, 0.79%, to finish at $73.23, a second day of slight slumping for the computer manufacturer. One of the stories developing, covered in <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=AAPL:US&amp;sid=aCjJNnxSKEnM">detail by Bloomberg</a>, is that Steve Jobs might have benefited by a form of stock options handwaving although the investigative board maintains that Jobs is squeaky clean.<br /><br />Meanwhile, MacNN <a href="http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/10/11/apple.stock.probe.issues/">points out a new report</a> saying two of the members involved in investigating the stock options irregularities may have been involved in granting backdated stock options themselves. If this is true, Apple will be facing a serious image problem with investors.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/apple-after-the-bell-10-11-06-options-issues-spread-further/">Apple after the bell 10/11/06: options issues spread further</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/apple-after-the-bell-10-11-06-options-issues-spread-further/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/683400/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/apple-after-the-bell-10-11-06-options-issues-spread-further/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>backdated stock options</category><category>BackdatedStockOptions</category><category>macnn</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 08/16/06: stock options issues seem contained]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/apple-after-the-bell-08-16-06-stock-options-issues-seem-contain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/apple-after-the-bell-08-16-06-stock-options-issues-seem-contain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/apple-after-the-bell-08-16-06-stock-options-issues-seem-contain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/snipshot_131a3ovb70.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Apple ended the day at $67.98, up $1.53, a nice 2.3% increase in the price. No doubt increased confidence is returning as analysts like that at Merrill Lynch state their belief that Apple's stock options issues <a href="http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/08/16/apple.restatement.risks/">seem contained</a> and won't drag the company down.<br /><br />Meanwhile Apple once again <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2006/8/16/5002">ranks first </a>in customer service satisfaction for personal computers. This is Apple's third straight year on the top of the index, although Dell computers is nipping at Apple's heels. This satisfaction comes despite iPod issues and MacBook discoloration concerns by customers.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/apple-after-the-bell-08-16-06-stock-options-issues-seem-contain/">Apple after the bell 08/16/06: stock options issues seem contained</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/apple-after-the-bell-08-16-06-stock-options-issues-seem-contain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/655329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/apple-after-the-bell-08-16-06-stock-options-issues-seem-contain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>backdated stock options</category><category>BackdatedStockOptions</category><category>customer satisfaction</category><category>CustomerSatisfaction</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 08/10/06: did Jobs grant options himself?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/apple-after-the-bell-08-10-06-did-jobs-grant-options-himself/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/apple-after-the-bell-08-10-06-did-jobs-grant-options-himself/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/apple-after-the-bell-08-10-06-did-jobs-grant-options-himself/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/snipshot_148lf8wtnj.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Apple ended the day at $64.07, up 48 cents at the market's close. This is an interesting reaction, as most of today's Apple news has had a negative spin. Even though Steve Jobs takes restricted stock as salary, and not options as some comments on Apple posts here have suggested, investigations are revealing that Steve Jobs presided over the compensation committee that granted the backdated options. Some analysts think bureaucratic layers between Jobs and the people making the decisions will keep him out, but what kind of leader does that portray him as? There could be some very negative PR for Jobs ahead.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/apple-after-the-bell-08-10-06-did-jobs-grant-options-himself/">Apple after the bell 08/10/06: did Jobs grant options himself?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/newsanalysis/techhardware/10302858.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/apple-after-the-bell-08-10-06-did-jobs-grant-options-himself/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/653343/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/apple-after-the-bell-08-10-06-did-jobs-grant-options-himself/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>backdated stock options</category><category>BackdatedStockOptions</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
