<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Banks Lobby Against Risk Retention on the Loans They Make]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/banks-lobby-against-risk-retention/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/banks-lobby-against-risk-retention/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/banks-lobby-against-risk-retention/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/all/" rel="tag">Allstate Corp (ALL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="banks" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/bank.jpg" />Let's go back to the financial crisis and the practices that brought this country to its knees. Banks developed a fancy scheme whereby they absolved themselves of all risk from the loans they made. They simply wrapped them up in a bundle and sold them to someone else. What they were doing is essentially packaging and reselling "junk."</p>
<p>When the news of how bad things were became known, the markets froze and collapsed. No one knew who had which securities, and if they did, they didn't know their true value.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/banks-lobby-against-risk-retention/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Banks Lobby Against Risk Retention on the Loans They Make</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/banks-lobby-against-risk-retention/">Banks Lobby Against Risk Retention on the Loans They Make</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/banks-lobby-against-risk-retention/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19895305/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/banks-lobby-against-risk-retention/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>All</category><category>Allstate</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>banking</category><category>credit risk</category><category>Dodd Frank</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>risk retention</category><category>securitization</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Wells Fargo, a Seinfeld Episode?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/10/chasing-value-wells-fargo-a-seinfeld-episode/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/10/chasing-value-wells-fargo-a-seinfeld-episode/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/10/chasing-value-wells-fargo-a-seinfeld-episode/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comic-relief/" rel="tag">Comic Relief</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="240" width="222" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/02/seinfeld.jpg" />When dealing with large companies, have you ever felt you were living through a scene from a Seinfeld episode?</p>
<p>In January Wells Fargo (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-co-new/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) completed a majority of its integration with <a href="https://www.wachovia.com/">Wachovia</a>, and I fear it will take years working out the bugs in the system. I say this because I am a major client, shareholder and trader dealing with the company on numerous levels, and the past few weeks would be comedic if not so infuriating.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/10/chasing-value-wells-fargo-a-seinfeld-episode/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Wells Fargo, a Seinfeld Episode?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/10/chasing-value-wells-fargo-a-seinfeld-episode/">Chasing Value: Wells Fargo, a Seinfeld Episode?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/10/chasing-value-wells-fargo-a-seinfeld-episode/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19858095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/10/chasing-value-wells-fargo-a-seinfeld-episode/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>big banks</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>featured</category><category>Seinfeld</category><category>too big to fail</category><category>Wells Fargo Bank</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America Posts $1.24 Billion Loss for Fourth Quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/bac-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Early Friday morning, Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">BAC</a>) reported a <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/b-of-a-posts-quarterly-loss-2011-01-21" target="_blank">fourth-quarter loss</a> of 16 cents per share ($1.2 billion). This includes the company's previously announced goodwill impairment charge of $2 billion that was related to its home loans and insurance business. Taking this charge out of the equation, BAC earned 4 cents per share. It could be an interesting morning for BAC, as experts predicted earnings of 18 cents per share.<br />
<br />
Shares of BAC were down more than 2% as we await the opening bell. This drop should push the stock low enough to mount a serious challenge to the support of both BAC's 20-month moving average and the $14 level.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America Posts $1.24 Billion Loss for Fourth Quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/">Bank of America Posts $1.24 Billion Loss for Fourth Quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19809842/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>bac earnings</category><category>bac loss</category><category>bac stock price</category><category>bank of america</category><category>banking</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment bank</category><category>investment banking</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup's Earnings Dragged Down by Bond Traders]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/18/citigroups-earnings-dragged-down-by-bond-traders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/18/citigroups-earnings-dragged-down-by-bond-traders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/18/citigroups-earnings-dragged-down-by-bond-traders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/logo-citigroup.jpg" alt="" />Citigroup, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) could have done better. Revenue from bond trading took a big hit. John Gerspach, Chief Financial Officer acknowledged that fixed income was weak and needs fixing.</p>
<p>Citi's profit was $1.3 billion compared with the year earlier loss of $7.6 billion. Revenue more than tripled to $18.4 billion from $5.4 billion a year ago. However it fell 11% from the third quarter. Citi has been aggressive in hiring more bankers causing expenses to rise. Earnings per share were four cents compared with a loss of 33 cents a year ago, as reported in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703954004576089632103724012.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews">Wall Street Journal.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/18/citigroups-earnings-dragged-down-by-bond-traders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup's Earnings Dragged Down by Bond Traders</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/18/citigroups-earnings-dragged-down-by-bond-traders/">Citigroup's Earnings Dragged Down by Bond Traders</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/18/citigroups-earnings-dragged-down-by-bond-traders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19805584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/18/citigroups-earnings-dragged-down-by-bond-traders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>bond unit</category><category>charges</category><category>Citigroup earnings revenues</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: Can You Feel the Pendulum Swinging?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/15/comfort-zone-investing-can-you-feel-the-pendulum-swinging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/15/comfort-zone-investing-can-you-feel-the-pendulum-swinging/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/15/comfort-zone-investing-can-you-feel-the-pendulum-swinging/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dd/" rel="tag">duPont(E.I.)deNemours (DD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="a golfer swinging - economic pendulum - comfort zone investing" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/01/golf.-swing.getty.jpg" />Economies go in cycles. They push to their breaking points, then move in the opposite direction. We saw it clearly in the '90s when there was no end to up (except there was and we abruptly hit it in 2000). In 2008, it felt like there was no end to down. But we now know there is. Things are picking up, and there are numbers to prove it.</p>
<p>Don't be the last to figure out we're in an economic recovery. Sitting on the sidelines, waiting for one more chance to buy a stock at the bargain price you saw in March of 2009 isn't going to happen. Times have changed. The U.S. economy is on the mend.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/15/comfort-zone-investing-can-you-feel-the-pendulum-swinging/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: Can You Feel the Pendulum Swinging?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/15/comfort-zone-investing-can-you-feel-the-pendulum-swinging/">Comfort Zone Investing: Can You Feel the Pendulum Swinging?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/15/comfort-zone-investing-can-you-feel-the-pendulum-swinging/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19798509/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/15/comfort-zone-investing-can-you-feel-the-pendulum-swinging/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>banking</category><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>DAN</category><category>DD</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>GM</category><category>GSK</category><category>housing sector</category><category>HPQ</category><category>IBM</category><category>INTC</category><category>NNBR</category><category>PG</category><category>stock market</category><category>stocks</category><category>TTM</category><category>unemployment numbers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup Sees a Bid After Q3 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/logo-citigroup.jpg" alt="" />Citigroup, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) is doing well today. At the time of this writing, shares were up 5% to $4.15. Volume was quite active. How should market participants view the stock? Should they be bullish or bearish?<br />
<br />
There are a lot of opinions out there on this company. If you remember the financial crisis, then you may feel like this is a stock one should never put money in. But if you're a speculator, you probably always consider the equity as a potential vehicle for short-term gains. It's changing hands in the low single digits, and its <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys/tech-chart">chart</a> communicates many possibilities for traders.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup Sees a Bid After Q3 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/">Citigroup Sees a Bid After Q3 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/citigroup-earnings-beat-wall-street-estimates/19678041/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19678771/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>C</category><category>citigroup</category><category>Citigroup earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>financial</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top Central Bankers Agree on New Rules for Global Banking]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/top-central-bankers-agree-on-new-rules-for-global-banking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/top-central-bankers-agree-on-new-rules-for-global-banking/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/top-central-bankers-agree-on-new-rules-for-global-banking/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/bank.jpg" />Top central bankers and regulators from 27 countries have agreed on new rules for central banking, according to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/business/global/13bank.html?_r=1&amp;hp"><em>The New York Times.</em></a><em> </em></p>
<p>Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the European Central Bank, said, "The agreements reached today are a fundamental strengthening of global capital markets." The agreement requires banks to raise the amount of common equity they hold to 7% of assets from 2%. Often known as Basel III, the group set a deadline of Jan. 1, 2013 for member nations to implement the rules.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/top-central-bankers-agree-on-new-rules-for-global-banking/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top Central Bankers Agree on New Rules for Global Banking</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/top-central-bankers-agree-on-new-rules-for-global-banking/">Top Central Bankers Agree on New Rules for Global Banking</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/business/global/13bank.html?_r=1&amp;hp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/top-central-bankers-agree-on-new-rules-for-global-banking/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19630314/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/top-central-bankers-agree-on-new-rules-for-global-banking/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>banking rules</category><category>basel 111</category><category>European Central Bank</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jean-claude trichet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UBS Reports Stronger-Than-Expected Second-Quarter Earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/27/ubs-earnings-stronger-than-expected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/27/ubs-earnings-stronger-than-expected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/27/ubs-earnings-stronger-than-expected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/ubs-logo-240.jpg" />Swiss bank UBS (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys" target="_blank">UBS</a>) reported Tuesday it <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/ubs-posts-second-quarter-profit-of-19/1042782/" target="_blank">earned 2 billion Swiss francs</a> ($1.9 billion) -- far better than the loss of 1.4 billion francs in the same quarter last year. Results also easily beat the consensus estimate. Furthermore, the company announced that it should have all the tax matters with the U.S. government settled by October. <br />
<br />
The bank enjoyed strong performance from its investment banking sector, which saw pretax profit increase 10%. "This was a good result in volatile market conditions, and demonstrates the progress we are making," CEO Oswald Gruebel said in a <a href="http://www.ubs.com/1/e/about/news.html?newsId=182327">statement</a>. "I remain confident in our future and I firmly believe that we have the right strategy in place."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/27/ubs-earnings-stronger-than-expected/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UBS Reports Stronger-Than-Expected Second-Quarter Earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/27/ubs-earnings-stronger-than-expected/">UBS Reports Stronger-Than-Expected Second-Quarter Earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/27/ubs-earnings-stronger-than-expected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19569937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/27/ubs-earnings-stronger-than-expected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>banks</category><category>finance</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>swiss bank</category><category>ubs</category><category>ubs earnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Swiss Lawmakers Reject Deal to Name American Clients of UBS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/08/swiss-lawmakers-reject-ubs-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/08/swiss-lawmakers-reject-ubs-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/08/swiss-lawmakers-reject-ubs-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="UBS logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/ubs-logo-240.jpg" />Looks like UBS (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys" target="_blank">UBS</a>) isn't going to hand over files on its American clients to U.S. tax authorities.</p>
<p>Nationalist and left-wing lawmakers blocked a treaty with the U.S. that would have allowed <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/swiss-lawmakers-reject-deal-with-us-in/458249/">UBS to hand over said files</a>. This "treaty" was reached last August between the Swiss government and Washington in order to put to rest a disagreement about UBS's supposed role in tax evasion. The boondoggle was that the Social Democrats wanted a commitment from the government to tax bankers' bonuses and the People's Party wanted a vote against the tax before dealing with the U.S. tax treaty.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/08/swiss-lawmakers-reject-ubs-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Swiss Lawmakers Reject Deal to Name American Clients of UBS</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/08/swiss-lawmakers-reject-ubs-deal/">Swiss Lawmakers Reject Deal to Name American Clients of UBS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/08/swiss-lawmakers-reject-ubs-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19507616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/08/swiss-lawmakers-reject-ubs-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank</category><category>banking</category><category>featured</category><category>financials</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Swiss</category><category>Switzerland</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>ubs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup Gets Its Groove Back]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/citigroup-gets-its-groove-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/citigroup-gets-its-groove-back/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/citigroup-gets-its-groove-back/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/citi.jpg" alt="" />Not long ago, Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) was considered a has-been as investors sought out other plays in the financials, like Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>). Of course, things can change quickly. As seen in the latest quarterly <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/citigroup-earnings-a-surprising-4-4-billion-profit-biggest-si/19444996/">report</a>, Citigroup is definitely getting traction and the stock price is up 4% in today's trading. If anything, the momentum should continue.<br />
<br />
With lots of cost-cutting, spin-offs of non-core assets and favorable interest rates, it seems like a no-brainer that Citigroup would eventually generate profits. In Q1, Citigroup posted net income of $4.43 billion, which compares to a loss of $7.58 billion in the same period a year ago.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/citigroup-gets-its-groove-back/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup Gets Its Groove Back</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/citigroup-gets-its-groove-back/">Citigroup Gets Its Groove Back</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/citigroup-gets-its-groove-back/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19445477/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/citigroup-gets-its-groove-back/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Banking</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank Failures Hit 42, Expected to Exceed 2009's 140]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/bank.jpg"  alt="" />Friday marked the failure of another <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bank/">bank</a>, pushing the 2010 total to 42. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation took over <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-04-09-bank-failures_N.htm" target="_blank">Beach First National Bank in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina</a>. <br />
<br />
The bank had $585.1 million in assets and $516 in deposits. Bank of North Carolina, based in Thomasville, is taking over the failed bank's assets and deposits. The Beach First failure is expected to cost the FDIC $130.3 million. <br />
<br />
A growing number of loan defaults, especially in the commercial real estate sector, have put considerable pressure on banks across the country. In fact, failures are expected to peak this year, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/" target="_blank">exceeding the 140 that occurred in 2009</a>, which was the worst year since 1992.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank Failures Hit 42, Expected to Exceed 2009's 140</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/">Bank Failures Hit 42, Expected to Exceed 2009's 140</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-04-09-bank-failures_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19434809/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank failure</category><category>bank failures</category><category>banking</category><category>banks</category><category>Beach First National Bank</category><category>commercial real estate</category><category>defaults</category><category>FDIC</category><category>Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>mortgages</category><category>real estate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China Is a Bigger Worry Than Greece]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/chineseflag.jpg" alt="" />The stock market has been fretting about the European Union's response to the economic calamity in Greece. That certainly is worthy of note as I have been doing the same lately, see: <a target="_blank" title="View Greek Debt Exposes European DisUnion on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/greek-debt-exposes-european-disunion/">Greek Debt Exposes European DisUnion</a>. However, Greece is not the economic titan that China is.<br />
<br />
China is a much larger concern to me because it can rock our world big-time!<br />
<br />
As Google Inc (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has experienced, along with other companies and the entire citizenry of China, they like their secrets, their silence, and their control. What they do not like is transparency, unfettered freedom, and distribution of information, and I doubt, your shareholder rights.<br />
<br />
"Who is watching the store?"<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>China Is a Bigger Worry Than Greece</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/">China Is a Bigger Worry Than Greece</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19415616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>China</category><category>disclosure</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>government</category><category>Greece</category><category>shareholder rights</category><category>ShareholderValue</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Three More Banks Fail]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/bank.jpg" alt="" />The bank failure rate slowed a bit last week, but the tally remains alarming. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-03-26-bank-closures_N.htm">Two banks in Georgia and one in Florida hit the skids</a>, bringing the 2010 total to 40.</p>
<p>The victims this time around were McIntosh Commercial Bank in Carrollton, Georgia, Unity National Bank in Cartersville, Georgia, and West Bank of Key West, Florida. Together the three bank failures are expected to cost the FDIC insurance fund approximately $213.6 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Three More Banks Fail</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/">Three More Banks Fail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19417903/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank failures</category><category>banking</category><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>FDIC</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mortages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank Death Toll Approaches 40]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/bank-death-toll-approaches-40/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/bank-death-toll-approaches-40/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/bank-death-toll-approaches-40/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/bank.jpg"  alt="" /><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/media.blogsmith.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/bank-vault.jpg" />Another seven banks were shuttered last week, bringing the number of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bankfailures/">bank failures</a> in 2010 to 37. The most recent casualties came from Alabama, Georgia, and Minnesota on Friday alone. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-03-19-bank-failures_N.htm">Earlier in the week, banks in Utah and Ohio were added to the count</a>.<br />
<br />
Advanta Bank, in Draper Utah, wasn't able to attract a buyer. The FDIC stepped in and approved payouts for insured deposits, with checks to depositors expected to be mailed on Monday. Advanta had $1.6 million in assets and $1.5 million in deposits.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/bank-death-toll-approaches-40/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank Death Toll Approaches 40</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/bank-death-toll-approaches-40/">Bank Death Toll Approaches 40</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/bank-death-toll-approaches-40/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19408230/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/bank-death-toll-approaches-40/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank</category><category>bank failure</category><category>bank failures</category><category>banking</category><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>FDIC</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[75 Days, 30 Bank Failures]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/75-days-30-bank-failures/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/75-days-30-bank-failures/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/75-days-30-bank-failures/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/bank.jpg" alt="" />Four more banks bit the dust last week, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-03-12-bank-failure_N.htm" target="_blank">bringing the total to 30</a> -- just shy of 75 days into 2010. Regulators closed banks in New York, Florida and Louisiana, representing in aggregate nearly $1.1 billion in assets and a little over a billion dollars in deposits.</p>
<p>Park Avenue Bank in New York was shut down by the FDIC this week. It had $520.1 million in assets and $494.5 million in deposits as of the end of last year. Its deposits will be assumed by Valley National Bank, which is based in Wayne, New Jersey, and it will pay a small premium for them. Valley National also agreed to pick up virtually all of the bank's assets.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/75-days-30-bank-failures/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>75 Days, 30 Bank Failures</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/75-days-30-bank-failures/">75 Days, 30 Bank Failures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-03-12-bank-failure_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/75-days-30-bank-failures/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19398328/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/75-days-30-bank-failures/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arkansas</category><category>bank</category><category>bank failure</category><category>bank failures</category><category>banking</category><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Louisiana</category><category>manhattan</category><category>new york</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank Failure Tally Hits 25]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/bank-failure-tally-hits-25/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/bank-failure-tally-hits-25/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/bank-failure-tally-hits-25/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/fdic-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Three more banks failed last week, bringing 2010's total to 25. Already, this year's bank failures have <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/bank-failures-surge-25-in-one-week/" target="_blank">matched the 2008 full-year total</a> and exceeded the 2007 amount by a factor of greater than eight. The three regional banks that failed last week were in Florida, Illinois and Maryland, with close to a billion dollars in aggregate assets. According to the FDIC, the pace of bank failures could be set to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-03-05-bank-failures_N.htm" target="_blank">accelerate in the next few months</a>.</p>
<p>Sun American Bank, in Boca Raton, was taken over by the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/FDIC/">FDIC</a>, with First-Citizens Bank &amp; Trust, based in Raleigh, N.C., assuming the Florida banks assets and almost all of its deposits. Sun American had assets of $535.7 million and $443.5 million in deposits. Since July, First-Citizens has acquired the assets of four failed banks, the others being First Regional Bank of Los Angeles, Venture Ban (Lacey, Wash.) and Temecula Valley Bank (Temecula, Calif.).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/bank-failure-tally-hits-25/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank Failure Tally Hits 25</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/bank-failure-tally-hits-25/">Bank Failure Tally Hits 25</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/bank-failure-tally-hits-25/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19386540/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/bank-failure-tally-hits-25/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank</category><category>bank failure</category><category>bank failures</category><category>banking</category><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>FDIC</category><category>Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/rich.jpg"  alt="" />Thanks to a trillion dollars in credit losses write-downs on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mortgage/">mortgage</a>-related securities in 2007 and 2008, financial companies around the world had a lot of capital to recapture. So, in the first half of 2009, they issued stock. More than half the new shares to come out worldwide in those six months were <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1">issued by banks and brokers</a>. All this stock, of course, translated to fees for investment banks. In a strange way, consequently, the financial industry healed itself.<br />
<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1">According to Bloomberg</a>, investment banking fees surged 13% in 2009, from $53.1 billion to $59.8 billion. This is still far short of the $86.9 billion record set in 2007, but it's at least a step in the right direction. Even with the surge of bank and broker shares issued in the first two quarters last year, total activity was still lower than in 2008.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/">JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19382910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>credit suisse</category><category>cs</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>merck</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MRK</category><category>ms</category><category>Schering-Plough</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lending Drops to Multi-Year Lows]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/lending-drops-to-multi-year-lows/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/lending-drops-to-multi-year-lows/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/lending-drops-to-multi-year-lows/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/fdic-logo-240.jpg" />According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., U.S. banks saw their sharpest decline in lending since 1942, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704188104575083332005461558.html" target="_blank">reports</a>. The lending drop is making it harder for the economy to recover. <br />
<br />
Yes, top-tier banks are recovering, but the rest of the banks are suffering. The FDIC believes the number of U.S. banks at risk of failing have increased to a 16-year high of 702. This makes these banks far less willing to extend loans, which leads the banks to take credit away from both businesses and consumers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/lending-drops-to-multi-year-lows/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lending Drops to Multi-Year Lows</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/lending-drops-to-multi-year-lows/">Lending Drops to Multi-Year Lows</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/lending-drops-to-multi-year-lows/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19371402/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/lending-drops-to-multi-year-lows/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>FDIC</category><category>Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation</category><category>FederalDepositInsuranceCorporation</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citibank Trips over Regulations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/citibank-trips-over-regulations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/citibank-trips-over-regulations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/citibank-trips-over-regulations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/citigrouppic.jpg" />Imagine that you go to withdraw funds from your checking account, only to find that you must give your bank seven days prior notice of the action. Does that sound outlandish? This regulatory fine print has been made all too real for customers of Citibank (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>).</p>
<p>In an informational snafu that got out of hand, Citibank notified its customers that it has the right, or the responsibility, to delay customers from retrieving their own money in certain rare instances. The misstep occurred when Citibank included this revelation on the statements of its customers nationwide.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/citibank-trips-over-regulations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citibank Trips over Regulations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/citibank-trips-over-regulations/">Citibank Trips over Regulations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/citibank-trips-over-regulations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19367027/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/citibank-trips-over-regulations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank run</category><category>banking</category><category>Citibank</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>FDIC</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>withhold funds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[First Niagara: A Low-Profile Gem]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/first-niagara-a-low-profile-gem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/first-niagara-a-low-profile-gem/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/first-niagara-a-low-profile-gem/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/first-niagara-logo.jpg"  alt="" />Community banking may become an enduring trend in the current decade, and that's a major reason I'm reiterating my buy rating for First Niagara Financial Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/first-niagara-financial-group-inc/fnfg/nas">FNFG</a>), first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/first-niagara-a-bank-sector-survivor/#continued">on April 27, 2009</a>, at a price of $13.55. <br />
<br />
First Niagara's stock has continued to meander since the spring buy call, but the value proposition remains the same: a community bank with few non-performing mortgages. Its residential loan portfolio, all in-house, is performing well.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/first-niagara-a-low-profile-gem/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>First Niagara: A Low-Profile Gem</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/first-niagara-a-low-profile-gem/">First Niagara: A Low-Profile Gem</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/first-niagara-a-low-profile-gem/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19337848/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/first-niagara-a-low-profile-gem/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>banks</category><category>community banks</category><category>First Niagara Financial Corp.</category><category>FNFG</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
