<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Rep. Frank: We May Abolish Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/24/rep-frank-we-may-abolish-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/24/rep-frank-we-may-abolish-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/24/rep-frank-we-may-abolish-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/barney-frank-240x160.jpg" alt="" />Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Barney Frank said Friday at a hearing on executive compensation issues: "I believe this committee will be recommending <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/23/business/23fannie.html">abolishing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac</a> in their current form and coming up with a whole new system of housing finance."</p>
<p>This represents a turnaround for Representative Frank (D., Mass.), who has been a staunch supporter of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/24/rep-frank-we-may-abolish-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rep. Frank: We May Abolish Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/24/rep-frank-we-may-abolish-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/">Rep. Frank: We May Abolish Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/24/rep-frank-we-may-abolish-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19329254/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/24/rep-frank-we-may-abolish-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FNM</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank's plan for regulating derivatives comes up short]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/barney_frank_160.jpg" />House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank has <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amik0fY5tT7c">a new proposal to regulate bank transactions</a>. Some of it is OK and some of it perpetuates the abuses that brought Lehman and other financial institutions to their knees.</p>
<p>First the OK part. Frank's proposal would require over-the-counter derivatives to be traded on listed exchanges and sold on exchanges or processed through a regulation platform. This is not good enough. We need transparency for each and every trade done by each and every financial institution. That means that <strong>all trades must be done on a listed exchange and cleared through a clearinghouse.</strong> All of this data can be put on computers and monitored daily. Then if some trader goes beyond established guidelines, he will be shut down immediately.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barney Frank's plan for regulating derivatives comes up short</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/">Barney Frank's plan for regulating derivatives comes up short</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183195/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank reform</category><category>bank regulation</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>naked short selling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fed under fire! Geithner wants to study Fed governance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/federal_reserve.jpg" alt="" />The U.S. Treasury and Congress are putting pressure on the Fed to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=adjvXg1zP.zY">disclose its governance policies</a>.</p>
<p>Almost three months ago, on June 17, the Obama administration proposed a regulatory overhaul including a "comprehensive review of the Fed's ability to accomplish its existing and proposed functions."</p>
<p>There is some confusion as to why the Treasury is undertaking this task. The Fed was created by Congress to be independent of the executive branch and Congress.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Fed under fire! Geithner wants to study Fed governance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/">The Fed under fire! Geithner wants to study Fed governance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19168202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>audits</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>big banks</category><category>Christopher Dodd</category><category>Congress</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Geithner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Richard Shelby</category><category>supervisory council</category><category>Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street bankers make tons of money trading with the Fed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/wall-street-bankers-make-tons-of-money-trading-with-the-fed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/wall-street-bankers-make-tons-of-money-trading-with-the-fed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/wall-street-bankers-make-tons-of-money-trading-with-the-fed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/df-epicharmus.jpg" width="220" height="122" alt="" />Ben Bernanke has pledged $12.3 trillion to help the banks and financial institutions. Where is all this money going? Much of it is going directly into the banks' accounts, hidden from the public.</p>
<p>This is how the game works. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e84383dc-7f8c-11de-85dc-00144feabdc0.html">The Fed is Wall Street's biggest customer</a>, buying massive amounts of mortgage-backed securities from banks. Now the Fed is being Mr. Nice Guy and publishes in advance the securities it intends to buy. Mr. Rip Off, the bank, simply raises the selling price to the Fed. The inflated prices produce huge profits for the banks. Of course the Fed knows all this is going on. This is simply a backdoor method of funneling government money into bank coffers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/wall-street-bankers-make-tons-of-money-trading-with-the-fed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street bankers make tons of money trading with the Fed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/wall-street-bankers-make-tons-of-money-trading-with-the-fed/">Wall Street bankers make tons of money trading with the Fed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e84383dc-7f8c-11de-85dc-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/wall-street-bankers-make-tons-of-money-trading-with-the-fed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19117184/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/wall-street-bankers-make-tons-of-money-trading-with-the-fed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Congress</category><category>Fed</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: A 1,000 S&amp;P scares the bears (AMZN, XOM, EXPE, GE, HOG, SYMC)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/expe/" rel="tag">Expedia Inc (EXPE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/symc/" rel="tag">Symantec Corp (SYMC)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />Today was just one of those solid days. It seems that regulation over non-financial firms being looser is a huge relief. Even a <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/30/weekly-jobless-claims-creep-back-up-toward-600k/">wider than expected</a> seasonal weekly jobless claims report did not hurt the market. Yesterday we had a potential huge technical event in oil prices, but the news today remedied that. Oil was up almost $4.00 at over $67.00 late in the day. We even had <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/30/two-ipos-hit-globe-specialty-metals-pennymac-gsmpmt/">two IPOs trading today</a>. <br /><br />Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	9,152.19 	+81.47 	(0.90%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	986.40 	+11.25 	(1.15%) <br />Nasdaq 	1,984.30 	+16.54 	(0.84%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/30/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-in-tech-telecom-akam-driv-ifx-leap-pcs-netl-sap-tel/">Top Analyst Calls</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: A 1,000 S&amp;P scares the bears (AMZN, XOM, EXPE, GE, HOG, SYMC)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/">Closing Bell: A 1,000 S&amp;P scares the bears (AMZN, XOM, EXPE, GE, HOG, SYMC)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19114792/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barney frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>GE finance</category><category>GeFinance</category><category>oil</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs upgrades General Electric]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/goldman-sachs-upgrades-general-electric/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/goldman-sachs-upgrades-general-electric/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/goldman-sachs-upgrades-general-electric/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" />This morning, Goldman Sachs decided it a prudent move to <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/general-electric-upgraded-to-buy-at-goldman-2009-07-30">upgrade</a> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) to Buy from Neutral and elevated the stock's price target to $15 from $13 per share. The reason for the upgrade was comments from U.S. House Financial Services Chair Barney Frank. The congressman seemed to indicate that there was support for regulatory reform that would "not mandate the separation of GE Captial."</p>
<p>The brokerage firm now estimates a 25% chance that GE Capital will be separated from GE, which could cost shareholders $40 billion, earlier the estimate was at 50%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/goldman-sachs-upgrades-general-electric/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs upgrades General Electric</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/goldman-sachs-upgrades-general-electric/">Goldman Sachs upgrades General Electric</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/goldman-sachs-upgrades-general-electric/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19114240/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/goldman-sachs-upgrades-general-electric/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>ge</category><category>GE Capital</category><category>General Electric</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank encourages Fannie, Freddie to relax lending standards]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/barney-frank-encourages-fannie-freddie-to-relax-lending-standar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/barney-frank-encourages-fannie-freddie-to-relax-lending-standar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/barney-frank-encourages-fannie-freddie-to-relax-lending-standar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/barney_frank_160.jpg" />Outspoken congressman Barney Frank has no shortage of critics, and they're sure to be out in force today. This morning, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported that the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, along with his colleague Anthony Weiner, is actually recommending that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Freddie Mac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>) <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562533240635581.html?mod=wsjcrmain"><em>relax</em> their lending standards</a> on condominiums.</p>
<p>The controversial request follows a decision by both Fannie and Freddie to tighten mortgage-lending standards for condos. In March, Fannie said it would no longer guarantee mortgages on condos in buildings where fewer than 70% of units have been rented, up from its previous benchmark of 51%. Freddie is due to implement similar measures in July. In a letter to the CEOs of both mortgage lenders, Reps. Frank and Weiner expressed their concerns that the higher standard "may be too onerous," and asked the lenders to "make appropriate adjustments" to their approach.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/barney-frank-encourages-fannie-freddie-to-relax-lending-standar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barney Frank encourages Fannie, Freddie to relax lending standards</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/barney-frank-encourages-fannie-freddie-to-relax-lending-standar/">Barney Frank encourages Fannie, Freddie to relax lending standards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/barney-frank-encourages-fannie-freddie-to-relax-lending-standar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19074183/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/barney-frank-encourages-fannie-freddie-to-relax-lending-standar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anthony Weiner</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>condo</category><category>condominium</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FNM</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lending standards</category><category>mortgage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America accused of shelling out big bonuses to bankers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="179" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bankofamerica.jpg" alt="" />A report today in <em>The New York Post </em>reveals that bailed-out <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) is still doling out <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06182009/business/bailout_bonus_at_bofa_174854.htm">millions in bonuses</a> to attract and retain top banking talent. Bank of America is catching heat over the bonus payouts, since it hasn't yet received federal clearance to repay its $45 billion in TARP loans.</p>
<p>Bank of America allegedly shelled out $15 million over two years to keep Fares Noujaim, an alumnus of both Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch, who now serves as the company's vice chairman of investment banking. Harry McMahon is named as another banker who's been enticed to stay with handsome bonuses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America accused of shelling out big bonuses to bankers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/">Bank of America accused of shelling out big bonuses to bankers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19071000/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>bonus</category><category>Fares Noujaim</category><category>featured</category><category>Harry McMahon</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kenneth Lewis</category><category>options</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Congress pass new banking regulations this year?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/16ccfcd6-4312-11de-b793-00144feabdc0.html"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/16ccfcd6-4312-11de-b793-00144feabdc0.html">There are new regulations </a>being floated about concerning how to handle a "big bank" failure. Barney Frank on the House side will take up debate on U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner's proposals for dealing with a new banking crisis.
<p> </p>
<p>The real elephant on the table is the fact that as it stands now, the largest banks are organized into bank holding companies, which stand outside current powers. Yes, at present the FDIC can move in and seize a bank, run it for a while before winding them down.The power to seize a major bank is so far not under FDIC authority. Under the Treasury's proposals, such authority would become law for what they call a "systemically important institution." Of course the key question is which banks would be termed "systemically important institutions."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Congress pass new banking regulations this year?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/">Will Congress pass new banking regulations this year?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 May 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/16ccfcd6-4312-11de-b793-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1549104/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking reform</category><category>BankingReform</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Tim Geithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi wants 1933 style investigation of Wall Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aE68O.jaWO4E&amp;refer=home"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aE68O.jaWO4E&amp;refer=home">House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi wants a 1933 style investigation of Wall Street</a>. She said that the American people are demanding to know the what and how of the Lehman, Bear Stearns and Merrill collapses. She wants to pattern her investigation after the Ferdinand Pecora hearings in 1933. The Pecora review "was probably the single most important congressional investigation in the history of our country, excepting the Watergate hearings. Congress is under public pressure to find out exactly what generated $1.3 trillion in financial industry losses, the details of the $700 billion dollar bailout and the $37 trillion destroyed in world markets. In response, John Larson, of Connecticut said: "We truly want to find out what happened to this country and level with the American people." Pelosi, in a speech on April 15 said: people need "to have a clear understanding as to how we got here and what the exposure is to the taxpayer to all this."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>House Speaker Pelosi wants 1933 style investigation of Wall Street</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/">House Speaker Pelosi wants 1933 style investigation of Wall Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aE68O.jaWO4E&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1524223/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1933 style investigation of Wall Street</category><category>1933StyleInvestigationOfWallStreet</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>c</category><category>Chris Dodd</category><category>ChrisDodd</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Pelosi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>We hear the name of Barney Frank quite often. He is Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. His <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=atpi4NaIiZVI&amp;refer=home">latest mantra is for more transparency</a> in the recent bank "stress tests."</p>
<p>What is so hard to believe is how naive Barney Frank really is. Doesn't he know that we have an underground banking system that regulators do not even touch. The underground banking system is comprised of all the "off-the-books" transactions like CDSs, CDOs, CLOs and all means of convoluted deals that are losing money and do not even show up on "stress tests." For example, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) is holding <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a96UdT6uCOcA&amp;refer=home">$87.7 trillion worth of CDSs</a> somewhere off the books.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/">Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=atpi4NaIiZVI&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1518149/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>stress tests</category><category>StressTests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac planning massive retention bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block">
<div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/fre-freddie-mac-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
</div>
<div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/fnm-fannie-mae-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>According to a report today in <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123876318076986497.html">The Wall Street Journal</a></em> [subscription required], <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Freddie Mac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>) -- those twin titans of mortgage mayhem -- are planning to dish out $210 million worth of retention bonuses over the next 18 months. James Lockhart, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, explained that $51 million in payouts were distributed in late 2008, with the rest of the bonuses to be disbursed through 2009 and into early 2010.</p>
<p>The news is already raising politicians' ire, since Fannie and Freddie are staying afloat only through the grace of government bailouts. The two lenders reported combined losses of roughly $108 billion in 2008, says the <em>Journal</em>, yet 80% of Freddie's employees and 61% of Fannie's payroll will score retention bonuses based on this bleak operating performance.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac planning massive retention bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/">Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac planning massive retention bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1507139/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barney frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>chuck grassley</category><category>ChuckGrassley</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>featured</category><category>fnm</category><category>fre</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>james lockhart</category><category>JamesLockhart</category><category>mortgage</category><category>retention bonus</category><category>RetentionBonus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank wants TARP money for foreclosures]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-wants-tarp-money-for-foreclosures/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-wants-tarp-money-for-foreclosures/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-wants-tarp-money-for-foreclosures/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>The subject just won't go away. Some lawmakers want TARP money to go toward stopping foreclosures. That is not exactly what the fund was supposed to be used for, but, by the same token, it was not meant to buy equity in banks. Paulson decided to do so anyway, which opened the door for using the TARP capital for whatever the Congress or Treasury want it to be used for.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123154832898469935.html">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a>, "The federal government should devote at least $50 billion of the remaining financial-rescue funds toward a plan to prevent foreclosures, said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank Friday."</p>
<p>That may be a noble idea, but it is not practical. The trouble with using government money to directly aid homeowners is that it would be remarkably complex and inefficient. Which homeowners qualify? How do they get their money, or a cut in their obligations? Is the program supervised by some federal agency or by banks? Who is considered needy and who is not?</p>
<p>Bailing out homeowners one at a time a a proposal that makes good headlines. It may help some members of Congress look like champions of the common man. But, the only realistic way to get relief for people having trouble paying their mortgages is to cut taxes or increase national employment. A person without a job, or a person worried about his job is not likely to view paying his mortgage any differently just because the government cuts his monthly payment from $800 to $600. It is still money he does not have.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-wants-tarp-money-for-foreclosures/">Barney Frank wants TARP money for foreclosures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-wants-tarp-money-for-foreclosures/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1425457/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-wants-tarp-money-for-foreclosures/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>Paulson</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank proposes TARP overhaul, including executive pay cap ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-proposes-tarp-overhaul-including-executive-pay-cap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-proposes-tarp-overhaul-including-executive-pay-cap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-proposes-tarp-overhaul-including-executive-pay-cap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>If you think change -- and big change -- in Washington won't start until the gentleman from Illinois is inaugurated on January 20, think again.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.house.gov/frank/">U.S. Rep. Barney Frank</a>, D-Mass. and chairman of the House Financial Services committee, late Friday <a href="http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/press0109093.shtml">announced the new, proposed restrictions</a> for the release of the second $350 billion in TARP funds, and some are stunners.</p>
<p>Under Frank's bill:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The pay of executives employed by TARP would be capped in a standardized manner, regardless of what type of aid they received under the program. It would also make the pay limit provision <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">retroactive to existing program participants.</span></li>
</ul>
<p>"If they don't like it, they can give the money back," Frank said, referring to the retroactive limits on pay, <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/bankingfinancial-SP/idUKN0929431220090109?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&amp;sp=true">Reuters reported Friday</a>.</p>
<ul>
    <li>The U.S. Treasury would have to dedicate at least $40 billion to reduce home foreclosures, with a plan developed by March 15.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-proposes-tarp-overhaul-including-executive-pay-cap/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barney Frank proposes TARP overhaul, including executive pay cap </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-proposes-tarp-overhaul-including-executive-pay-cap/">Barney Frank proposes TARP overhaul, including executive pay cap </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-proposes-tarp-overhaul-including-executive-pay-cap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1425280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/barney-frank-proposes-tarp-overhaul-including-executive-pay-cap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>bank sector</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banks benefit from TARP]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><em>This post was written by anonymous </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com"><em>Minyanville</em></a><em> contributor Minyan Peter.</em></p>
<p>Representative Barney Frank is reported to be recommending that $50 billion of TARP money be used to "alter" loans. <br /><br />While the route may be circuitous and positioned as great for Joe Q. Public, I think it is important to recognize that the ultimate beneficiary is the banks. <br /><br />Like the rumored tax carry-back benefit rumored on Monday, Representative Frank's proposal represents yet another potentially "non-dilutive" injection of additional government capital into the banks. <br /><br />Given the United States' position as the global "capitalist" nation - and its symbolic importance in attracting global "entrepreneurial" capital, I expect that Congress will go through enormous (albeit often convoluted) steps to avoid the overt nationalization of the banking system that we are seeing in Germany and the UK. <br /><br />This doesn't mean we won't see more marienette shows like yesterday's press conference with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and the Senate, but given the public outrage to the government's overt bailout of the banks, going forward (if at all possible) I expect the means used will be far less obvious to the taxpayer.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/">Banks benefit from TARP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1424779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barney frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>tarp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC is 0-8 on Madoff probes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/bernardmadoff.jpg" alt="" />Today <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=awtWspVB8cng&amp;refer=us">Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA)</a> will grill the SEC on why it missed the $50 billion Madoff Securities Ponzi scheme. After all, over the last 16 years, the SEC investigated Madoff <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSBNG36015720090105">eight times</a> and each of those times, it failed to discover the scam. This -- and so much more -- means it's time for a change in the way Washington regulates <a href="http://money.aol.com/madoff">Wall Street</a>.</p>
<p>And Frank is sure to use today's stage to talk. Last Monday, I appeared on a TV program in Boston "with" Frank. I put "with" in quotes because when Frank arrived at the TV studio, he made sure that me and any other guests who were to appear got thrown out of the green room so he could have it to himself. And while I was on the set with Frank -- I was scheduled to go on the show right after him -- he never even looked at me -- by contrast, every other person I have appeared with was happy to introduce themselves. </p>
<p>Frank likes to talk -- he used 25 of the 30 minutes (he was supposed to take up about 15 minutes). (And in the four minutes Frank left me, I gave out a few <a href="http://www.necn.com/Boston/Business/2008/12/29/Wall-Streets-worst-ideas-of/1230602638.html">Bernie awards</a> for the worst financial foibles of 2008.) So when he chairs hearings today, Frank will no doubt do quite a bit of talking. And he'll probably ask why the SEC officials failed to discover the Madoff scandal after receiving emails from a New York hedge fund that described his business practices as <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSBNG36015720090105">"highly unusual</a>." As I posted, I think Frank should focus on the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/print/">village that enabled Madoff</a>. </p>
<p>Let's hope things get better this year.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of </em><a href="http://petercohan.com/"><font color="#0072bc"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></font></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><font color="#0072bc"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></font></a><em>. His eighth book is</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/You-Cant-Order-Change-Turnaround/dp/1591842395/ref=sr_1_2/002-0707230-7400838?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220097046&amp;sr=1-2"><font color="#0072bc">You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing</font></a><em>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/">SEC is 0-8 on Madoff probes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1418741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>bernard madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>inthenews</category><category>madoff</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Treasury says TARP is working, banks obligated to lend; so why aren't they?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/treasury-says-tarp-is-working-banks-obligated-to-lend-so-why-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/treasury-says-tarp-is-working-banks-obligated-to-lend-so-why-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/treasury-says-tarp-is-working-banks-obligated-to-lend-so-why-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>A cardinal rule of Washington is don't tick-off anyone chairing a committee essential to your operations.<br /><br />Well, it looks like this U.S. Treasury Department has done just that. <br /><br />U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd and U.S. Rep. Barney Frank have just about had it with the U.S. Treasury Department and its implementation of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). <br /><br />Dodd, D-Connecticut and Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, and Frank, D-Massachusetts and Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said this administration's Treasury department may not get the second half of the $700 billion TARP financial rescue fund, as they are upset at how the program is being run, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=ad0zAYvGDuvc">Bloomberg News reported.</a> <br /><br />"I would be a very hard person to convince that this crowd deserves...the next $350 billion," Sen. Dodd <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=ad0zAYvGDuvc">told Bloomberg News.</a> <br /><br />Further, Rep. Frank said Treasury has ignored "clear Congressional intent," and that at the very least he wants to see that some of the new money was going to used for home mortgage foreclosure relief, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=ad0zAYvGDuvc">Bloomberg News reported.</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/treasury-says-tarp-is-working-banks-obligated-to-lend-so-why-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Treasury says TARP is working, banks obligated to lend; so why aren't they?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/treasury-says-tarp-is-working-banks-obligated-to-lend-so-why-a/">Treasury says TARP is working, banks obligated to lend; so why aren't they?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/treasury-says-tarp-is-working-banks-obligated-to-lend-so-why-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1392290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/treasury-says-tarp-is-working-banks-obligated-to-lend-so-why-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>Chris Dodd</category><category>Congress</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Obama Administration</category><category>Paulson</category><category>refinancings</category><category>TARP</category><category>toxic assets</category><category>ToxicAssets</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. House leadership's new task: Find 13 more votes ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />By almost all accounts, the defeat of the bailout / rescue bill stunned those both inside the beltway, on Wall Street, and across the nation. <br /><br />Many political analysts projected that the bill would be approved by the U.S. House of Representatives by about a 80-100 vote margin. The reality: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/bailout.fallout/index.html">bill defeated, 228-205</a> and the stock market plunged a big seven zero zero and more.<br /><br />Public policy analysts, professional and otherwise, will spend ample time investigating the reasons why the bill failed, but in a crisis such as this one, congressional leaders, save for reviewing their mistakes, do not have time for the stuff of graduate seminars in public policy: they need to get a rescue bill passed.<br /><strong><br />Now what? </strong><br /><br />Well first, don't panic. As <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bailey_(fictional_character)">George Bailey</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Stewart_(actor)">Jimmy Stewart</a>) said during the bank run on the the Bailey Building &amp; Loan in the movie, <a style="FONT-STYLE: italic" href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/MovieSpeeches/moviespeechitsawonderfullifaddresstothepeople.html">It's A Wonderful Life</a>, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">"Now just remember that this thing isn't as black as it appears. Now, we can get through this thing all right. But we've, we've got to stick together.</span>"<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/bailout.fallout/index.html"></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. House leadership's new task: Find 13 more votes ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/">U.S. House leadership's new task: Find 13 more votes ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/bailout.fallout/index.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1327920/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1929</category><category>1929 stock market crash</category><category>bailout bill</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>John Boehner</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>Nancy Pelosi</category><category>NYSE</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>stock market</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. House of Representatives</category><category>U.S. Senate</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><category>U.s.Economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Congress fund a homeowners' refinance program after the bailout?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/foreclosure.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />If a vote were held Thursday or Friday, the <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/">U.S. Treasury's $700 billion bailout bill</a> would probably pass both chambers of the U.S. Congress, but by narrow margins and with a) an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers for every company that receives assistance, b) a cap on executive compensation, and c) oversight provisions. <br /><br />Once the bailout work is done, should the U.S. Congress also pass a homeowners assistance bill to help more homeowners with at-risk / burdensome mortgages refinance to secure a lower interest rate? <br /><br />As BloggingStocks' Jon Berr <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/where-are-the-homeowners-in-the-700-billion-bailout/">pointed out Monday</a>, while lawmakers (and no doubt taxpayers) do not want to reward housing speculators, there's a large pool of borrowers who will be able to pay their mortgages if they can get out of high interest rate notes, and other burdensome adjustable rate mortgages, and refinance at a low, 30-year fixed rate. <br /><br />While it's true the U.S. Government and taxpayers would end up subsidizing refinanced mortgages if the government receives interest that's less than it could by investing the money elsewhere, the costs of foreclosure - leading to bond defaults - leading to banking institution stress / systemic stress will undoubtedly be far greater, so says economist David H. Wang.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should Congress fund a homeowners' refinance program after the bailout?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/">Should Congress fund a homeowners' refinance program after the bailout?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1323805/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>bailout bill</category><category>barney frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>Darwin</category><category>Economic Darwinism</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Housing Administration</category><category>FederalHousingAdministration</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>fnm</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>fre</category><category>free market</category><category>gdp</category><category>home ownership</category><category>House Financial Services Committee</category><category>HouseFinancialServicesCommittee</category><category>housing sector</category><category>interest rates</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Social Darwinism</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economists: Pass bailout bill with an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>The U.S. Treasury's <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/">$700 billion bailout bill</a> is winding its way through the Congress. <br /><br />To say the situation is dynamic and fluid would be the understatement of the year. The Congress, led by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, is likely to propose and obtain substantial changes in the legislation, changes it believes will better protect the U.S. taxpayer and more efficiently deploy the. funds allocated.<br /><br />The American people, if public opinion polls are an accurate gauge, are skeptical of the plan at best, and at worst view it as rewarding large financial institutions and other companies whose flawed practices both perpetuated and magnified the crisis.<br /> <br />In addition, with <a href="http://www.npr.org/news/specials/election2008/2008-election-map.html#/senate-nprOvM/">an election up ahead</a> in about a month, Congress (particularly the 435 representatives and 35 senators up for re-election) will be especially sensitive to public opinion, with many not wanting to go against it for fear of being voted out of office. <br /><strong><br />Is the bailout bill a solution?</strong>
<p>With the above as a backdrop, BloggingStocks Wednesday asked three economists, David H. Wang, Richard Felson, and Peter Dawson, for their policy recommendation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economists: Pass bailout bill with an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/">Economists: Pass bailout bill with an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1323423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>banking sector</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>bond market</category><category>Chris Dodd</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>credit markets</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>gdp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Paulson</category><category>public opinion</category><category>taxpayers</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
