<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Options Traders Add Bearish Bets on Hartford Financial Services]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/bearish-bets-on-hartford-financial/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/bearish-bets-on-hartford-financial/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/bearish-bets-on-hartford-financial/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="Hartford HIG logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/logohartford.jpg" />Hartford Financial Services (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-hartford-financial-services-group-inc/hig/nys">HIG</a>) attracted unusually heavy put volume on Wednesday, with 1.7 times the expected number of puts crossing the tape. About 10,000 put options were traded on the insurance issue during the course of yesterday's session, compared to fewer than 8,000 calls that changed hands.</p>
<p>Data from the International Securities Exchange (ISE) points to a strongly bearish bias. On Wednesday, options traders on the ISE bought to open 2,554 puts on HIG, while only 339 calls were purchased. The equity's single-day ISE put/call volume ratio of 7.53 underscores a distinct preference for pessimistically oriented options.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/bearish-bets-on-hartford-financial/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Options Traders Add Bearish Bets on Hartford Financial Services</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/bearish-bets-on-hartford-financial/">Options Traders Add Bearish Bets on Hartford Financial Services</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 May 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/bearish-bets-on-hartford-financial/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19484889/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/bearish-bets-on-hartford-financial/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst ratings</category><category>bears</category><category>Hartford Financial Services</category><category>HIG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investor sentiment</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>short interest</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Bearish analysts wrong on Texas Instruments]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-better-to-be-right-than-to-be-a-bear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-better-to-be-right-than-to-be-a-bear/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-better-to-be-right-than-to-be-a-bear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/txn/" rel="tag">Texas Instruments (TXN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="#">How to Earn $1</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p><em>The Street.com's Jim Cramer says that they should recognize that what's more important than being a bear is being right.</em></p>
<p>Ah, the lot of the bear is a beautiful lot -- never wrong, always having fun at the bullish optimists, never going down for defeat. For them, every day is a day when the St. Louis Cardinals will face the Boston Red Sox in the World Series, even after they have been eliminated.</p>
<p>Cases in point: two reports yesterday on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/txn/nys">Texas Instruments</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/txn/nys">TXN</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=TXN">Cramer's Take</a>) from the Joy Luck Bear Club, Christopher Danely from JPMorgan and Alex Gauna from JMP Securities. Both of these gentlemen have fought the good but totally wrong fight against Texas Instruments. After what was a monumentally good quarter for the company, Gauna, who has Texas Instruments as an "underperform," raised his price target dramatically from $16 to $18. That would be totally in keeping with the direction of the earnings (way up), except that the stock's at $23.50.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-better-to-be-right-than-to-be-a-bear/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Bearish analysts wrong on Texas Instruments</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-better-to-be-right-than-to-be-a-bear/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Bearish analysts wrong on Texas Instruments</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-better-to-be-right-than-to-be-a-bear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19203919/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-better-to-be-right-than-to-be-a-bear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alex Gauna</category><category>bears</category><category>bulls</category><category>Christopher Danely</category><category>featured</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Texas Instruments</category><category>TXN</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: The down day that didn't feel too down (USU, WFMI, BID, ERTS, TIVO)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/closing-bell-the-down-day-that-didnt-feel-too-down-usu-wfmi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/closing-bell-the-down-day-that-didnt-feel-too-down-usu-wfmi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/closing-bell-the-down-day-that-didnt-feel-too-down-usu-wfmi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfmi/" rel="tag">Whole Foods Market (WFMI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bid/" rel="tag">Sotheby's (BID)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-black-white.jpg" alt="" />The markets closed down in negative territory, but today will feel like a win to many traders. Each day the news keeps getting a set up for a sell-off and nothing materializes. Bears are even getting frustrated because of no substantial pullbacks. The weaker employment data had little dent, but then the weaker services market kept the rally from emerging today. <br /><br />Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	9,280.97 	-39.22 	(-0.42%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	1,002.68 	-2.97 	(-0.30%) <br />Nasdaq 	1,993.05 	-18.26 	(-0.91%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/08/05/top-analyst-upgrades-acor-cce-cree-cvs-ice-svvs/">Top Analyst Upgrades</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/08/05/top-analyst-downgrades-adm-ctrp-cyn-cvlt-nrgy-kim-osk-spg-ubs/">Top Analyst Downgrades</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/closing-bell-the-down-day-that-didnt-feel-too-down-usu-wfmi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: The down day that didn't feel too down (USU, WFMI, BID, ERTS, TIVO)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/closing-bell-the-down-day-that-didnt-feel-too-down-usu-wfmi/">Closing Bell: The down day that didn't feel too down (USU, WFMI, BID, ERTS, TIVO)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/closing-bell-the-down-day-that-didnt-feel-too-down-usu-wfmi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19120483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/closing-bell-the-down-day-that-didnt-feel-too-down-usu-wfmi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bears</category><category>department of energy</category><category>DepartmentOfEnergy</category><category>EA</category><category>services data</category><category>ServicesData</category><category>sothebys</category><category>tivo</category><category>usec</category><category>whole foods</category><category>WholeFoods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Traders preparing for another 'hang on to your hat' Friday ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/traders-preparing-for-another-hang-on-to-your-hat-friday/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/traders-preparing-for-another-hang-on-to-your-hat-friday/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/traders-preparing-for-another-hang-on-to-your-hat-friday/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img id="image" style="LEFT: 0px; WIDTH: 255px; TOP: 0px; HEIGHT: 179px" height="179" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://services.snipshot.com/scratch/xn3vnbkqb.tif/size_255,179/quality_0.45/snipshot.jpg" width="255" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It looks like tomorrow could very well become yet another "hang on to your hat Friday" or another edition of "<span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">As The U.S. Economy Turns."</span><br /><br />Still, hopefully it won't become another 'down goes the Dow' day with an extended visit from our old friend, you guessed it, Dow 8,000. But analysts and economists haven't ruled the latter out. <br /><br />The reason? The January 2009 jobs report, to be released by the <a href="http://www.dol.gov/">U.S. Labor Department</a> at 8:30 a.m. EST. </p>
<p>Following nearly a week in which a Fortune 500 company announced a major downsizing daily, and on the heels of December 2008's loss of 524,000 jobs, most professionals in economics and public policy circles are preparing for another sobering jobs report. <br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/traders-preparing-for-another-hang-on-to-your-hat-friday/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Traders preparing for another 'hang on to your hat' Friday </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/traders-preparing-for-another-hang-on-to-your-hat-friday/">Traders preparing for another 'hang on to your hat' Friday </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/traders-preparing-for-another-hang-on-to-your-hat-friday/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1451662/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/traders-preparing-for-another-hang-on-to-your-hat-friday/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>banking sector</category><category>bears</category><category>bulls</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bulls vs. Bears battle for Dow 8,000 to continue into new year ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-to-continue-into-new-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-to-continue-into-new-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-to-continue-into-new-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/merrill_lynch_bull_robertoschmidt_afp_20070914.jpg" />Earlier this month, the Dow made two runs at 9,000 before moving back toward the 8,500 range, which brings Dow 8,000 back in to focus. <br /><br />For those investors who may not follow indices closely, the 8,000 level has psychological but not technical support, the latter of which measures such things as the number of investors who are buying and selling, whether investors are committing new money to the market, and so on. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The issue: U.S. economy's health</span><br /><br />Even so, right now a battle is taking place between the bulls and the bears: the bears argue the worst economic news stemming from the financial crisis is yet to come; the bulls, that the worst news is behind us and that government stimulus, fiscal and monetary, will get the economy moving again. <br /><br /><a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">The Dow</a> Wednesday closed below 8,419. If the bears can keep the Dow below 8,000 then push it through 7,800, then 7,600, it will not be a pleasant time for investors. <br /><br />Further, with most trading desks half-staffed during the last two weeks of the year, nothing definitive regarding the market's direction is likely to occur before the new year. Also, institutions may continue to sit on their hands in early January 2009, preferring to await the Obama Administration's inauguration and the announcement of the fiscal stimulus package's exact size, now believed to be approaching $800 billion over two years.<br /><br />Even so, let's do a condensed, cross-methodology analysis to see if we can arrive at an informed investment analysis regarding where the Dow is headed, near-term. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Technical Indicators:</span> Bearish.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Fundamental Indicators:</span> Bearish.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-to-continue-into-new-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bulls vs. Bears battle for Dow 8,000 to continue into new year </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-to-continue-into-new-year/">Bulls vs. Bears battle for Dow 8,000 to continue into new year </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-to-continue-into-new-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1410849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-to-continue-into-new-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bears</category><category>bulls</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bulls vs. Bears battle for Dow 8,000 continues]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-continues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-continues/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-continues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_down_down_240.jpg" alt="" />Once again, <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">Dow 8,000</a> has come back into focus. <br /><br />For those investors who may not follow indices closely, the 8,000 level has a psychological but not technical support, the latter of which measures such things as the number of investors who are buying / selling, whether investors are committing more money to the market etc. <br /><br />Even so, right now, a battle is taking place between the bulls and the bears: the bears argue the worst economic news stemming from the financial crisis is yet to come; the bulls argue that the worst news is behind us, and that government stimulus, fiscal and monetary, will get the U.S. economy moving again. <br /><br />The Dow Jones Industrial Average Wednesday closed below 8,000 at 7,997. If the bears can keep the Dow below 8,000 and then push it through 7,800, then 7,600, it will not be a pleasant time for investors. <br /><br />Let's do a condensed, cross-methodology analysis to see if we can arrive at an informed investment decision / conclusion regarding where the Dow is headed, near-term.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-continues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bulls vs. Bears battle for Dow 8,000 continues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-continues/">Bulls vs. Bears battle for Dow 8,000 continues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-continues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1377321/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/bulls-vs-bears-battle-for-dow-8-000-continues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>bears</category><category>bond market</category><category>bulls</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>credit default swaps</category><category>credit markets</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>Fed</category><category>gdp</category><category>resistance</category><category>support</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is now a good time to sell 20% of your stock portfolio?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>Talk to the stock market's bulls and they argue the Dow is <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">forming a bottom at / near 8,000.</a><br /><br />Talk to the bears and they say you're dreaming, if you think the Dow has bottomed at 8,000. <br /><br />What's the typical investor to do?<br /><br />Let's do a condensed, cross-methodology analysis to see if we can arrive at an informed investment decision / conclusion. <br /><br /><strong>Technical Indicators:</strong> Bearish.<br /><strong>Fundamental Indicators:</strong> Bearish.<br /><strong>Monetary Policy:</strong> Officials are doing everything they can to stimulate growth. Bullish.<br /><strong>Fiscal Policy:</strong> More fiscal stimulus should be on the way, in both the U.S. and aboard. Bullish. <br /><br /><strong>Credit Markets:</strong> Recovering, but still strained, with still too much interbank distrust / fear. Bearish.<br /><br /><strong>Geopolitical Risk:</strong> On average, it's about the same as it has been during the past 3-5 years. Neutral.<br /><br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The view from here argues that the outlook for U.S. stocks / stock market is bearish at least for the next six months, and most likely for much of 2009. Further, if Dow 8,000 doesn't hold, the market could fall much more, particularly after 2009 earnings estimates are revised downward, as they are expected to be. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is now a good time to sell 20% of your stock portfolio?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/">Is now a good time to sell 20% of your stock portfolio?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1366798/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bear market rally</category><category>bears</category><category>bull market</category><category>bulls</category><category>dead cat bounce</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Snow puts further freeze on bulls]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-snow-puts-further-freeze-on-bulls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-snow-puts-further-freeze-on-bulls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-snow-puts-further-freeze-on-bulls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer snow's not good for stocks, particularly coupled with other disturbing news.</span><br style="font-style: italic;" /><br />When I was long and it snowed, I would always be worried: Would the bulls stay home? Would they defend their turf?    <br /><br />And when the snow happened on Friday I just figured my portfolio would be a free fire zone: What bull comes to work on a snowday? They take off. The rigor, the toughness, the never miss guys, they are all bears!    <br /><br />I actually thought like that. So, when I woke up and saw the snow I figured, oh yeah, this will be such an easy market to push down, there is so little going for it.    <br /><br />And that's the real issue, isn't it? Other than rate cut possibilities and some good numbers from companies that do a lot of business overseas, this market has nothing going for it. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-snow-puts-further-freeze-on-bulls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Snow puts further freeze on bulls</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-snow-puts-further-freeze-on-bulls/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Snow puts further freeze on bulls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-snow-puts-further-freeze-on-bulls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1121890/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-snow-puts-further-freeze-on-bulls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bears</category><category>bulls</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>snow</category><category>weather</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Federal Reserve waves a green flag, bulls charge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/federal-reserve-waves-a-green-flag-bulls-charge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/federal-reserve-waves-a-green-flag-bulls-charge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/federal-reserve-waves-a-green-flag-bulls-charge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p>Only with something as arcane and mysterious as Federal Reserve interest rate policy does it make perfect sense that a governmental body could <a href="http://money.aol.com/marketnews">decide to make no changes</a> and the stock market would mysteriously surge.</p>
<p>That's just what happened today when the Fed decided to leave interest rates at 5.25% -- for the fifth straight month - and investors rejoiced. The Dow Jones industrial average jumped more than 100 points following the Fed's announcement, reaching a new intraday high.</p>
<p>What explains the excitement? As my BloggingStocks colleague <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/jon-ogg/">Jon Ogg</a> explained, many investors were concerned the Fed might warn today that it saw that inflation was a risk and signal that it could raise rates in the future. Or, as Ogg put it it in an instant message, "<font size="2">some were worried they would be inflation hawks and indicate their fear of rising prices because of decent economic data." </font></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/federal-reserve-waves-a-green-flag-bulls-charge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Federal Reserve waves a green flag, bulls charge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/federal-reserve-waves-a-green-flag-bulls-charge/">Federal Reserve waves a green flag, bulls charge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/federal-reserve-waves-a-green-flag-bulls-charge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/746065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/federal-reserve-waves-a-green-flag-bulls-charge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bears</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>bulls</category><category>Dow Jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>Fed</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Super Bowl indicator points to an 18% Dow rise this year?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/super-bowl-indicator-strikes-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/super-bowl-indicator-strikes-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/super-bowl-indicator-strikes-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/football-field-255a072106.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Bob Stovall, currently of Wood Asset Management, popularized the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/nfls-biggest-winner-bulls-not-bears/20070122095809990001">Super Bowl stock market indicator</a>, which says that if an <strong>old NFL</strong> team -- one that was part of the original NFL prior to the 1970 merger of the NFL and AFL -- wins the Super Bowl, the market will rise that year. Stovall claims that this indicator has correctly predicted the direction of the Dow Jones Industrial Average almost 80% of the time.</p>
<p>This year, the indicator pits two old NFL teams against each other. The Bears facing the Colts marks the seventh time that two old NFL teams have faced off in the big game. The six previous times that's happened, the Dow has gone up every time, posting an average gain of 18%.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><iframe border="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1089&amp;view=100991&amp;pollId=101076&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1" frameborder="0" width="175" scrolling="no" height="165"></iframe>I've commented on this indicator in the past and agree with those who find it a curious coincidence. But as a New England Patriots fan, I am not now in the mood to contemplate the certainty that an old NFL team will win the Super Bowl next month. When the Patriots were up 21-3 in the second quarter, I was optimistic. But I will admit to fearing a turning point when I saw how the Colts -- which moved to the AFC when the NFL and AFL merged in 1970 -- were able to score right before the end of the first half.</p>
<p>After correctly predicting the market 90% of the time in the Super Bowl's first 31 years, the indicator has had some trouble in recent years. It failed in 2004 after the Dow gained following the Patriots victory over the Carolina Panthers. And the indicator's had only two clean wins in the last nine games. In fact, two of the market's best years followed wins by the AFL-born Denver Broncos over old NFL teams in 1998 and 1999.</p>
I don't believe the Dow will rise 18% this year. But I will be rooting for the Bears!
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm, a </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>Professor of Management at Babson College</em></a><em>, and editor of <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html">The Cohan Letter</a>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/super-bowl-indicator-strikes-again/">Super Bowl indicator points to an 18% Dow rise this year?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/nfls-biggest-winner-bulls-not-bears/20070122095809990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/super-bowl-indicator-strikes-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/740192/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/super-bowl-indicator-strikes-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>afl</category><category>bears</category><category>Bob Stovall</category><category>BobStovall</category><category>broncos</category><category>colts</category><category>nfl</category><category>patriots</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl stock market indicator</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlStockMarketIndicator</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:28:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
