<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[HootSuite Rakes in Close to $2 Million in New Venture Round]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/hootsuite.jpg" alt="" />The Twitter-verse continues to get interesting. I've always felt that the returns are to be found around <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> rather than with Twitter itself, and the venture capital community seems to be acting from the same position. <a href="http://blog.hootsuite.com/hootsuite-announces-1-9-million-in-financing/" target="_blank">Twitter interaction platform HootSuite just announced a new round of venture capital funding</a>, with $1.9 million in fresh money coming in the door to support its growth efforts.<br /><br />HootSuite, which was started by <a href="http://invokemedia.com/" target="_blank">Invoke Media</a> in November 2008, has evolved into a brand monitoring, file-sharing and social media integration utility. Only a year later, it has attracted more than 300,000 users, from Time (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/MarthaStewart/">Martha Stewart</a> to the White House to Aol (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aol-inc/aol/nys" target="_blank">AOL</a>).BloggingStocks is among the Aol blogs using HootSuite.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HootSuite Rakes in Close to $2 Million in New Venture Round</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/">HootSuite Rakes in Close to $2 Million in New Venture Round</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19318454/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>AOL</category><category>Apple</category><category>blogs</category><category>blumberg</category><category>facebook</category><category>hearst</category><category>HearstCorp</category><category>hootsuite</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iphone</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twitter</category><category>twx</category><category>venture capital</category><category>venture capital deals</category><category>VentureCapital</category><category>VentureCapitalDeals</category><category>wordpress</category><category>wordpress.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is DirecTV's use of Chris Farley distasteful? Will it help the stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/dtv-directtv-logo.jpg" />Very interesting story/rant over on <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/10/26/david-spade-brings-pal-chris-farley-back-from-the-dead-to-shill/?icid=main|aim|dl6|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.walletpop.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F10%2F26%2Fdavid-spade-brings-pal-chris-farley-back-from-the-dead-to-shill%2F">WalletPop.com</a> about the latest in a line of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc-cmn-stk/dtv/nas">DirecTV</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc-cmn-stk/dtv/nas">DTV</a>) ads -- this one featuring Chris Farley. Jami Bernard, the rant's author, is upset that David Spade is using a famous clip from his and Farley's hit comedy <em>Tommy Boy</em> to advertise the satellite-television provider. Bernard argues that Farley would not have liked to be remembered for a minor fat joke.</p>
<p>How was that assumption exactly made? Farley made fun of his size. He made his money by being an oversized, clumsy, fish-out-of-water comedian, so how can we determine that a "minor fat joke" (which some may argue is the funniest part of a very funny movie) is how he would or would not like to be remembered? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is DirecTV's use of Chris Farley distasteful? Will it help the stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/">Is DirecTV's use of Chris Farley distasteful? Will it help the stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19211372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/is-directvs-use-of-chris-farley-distasteful-will-it-help-the-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogosphere</category><category>Blogs</category><category>Chris Farley</category><category>David Spade</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>DTV</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Entrepreneur's Journal: Should your business start giving away stuff?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/entrepreneurs-journal-should-your-business-start-giving-away-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/entrepreneurs-journal-should-your-business-start-giving-away-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/entrepreneurs-journal-should-your-business-start-giving-away-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/free.jpg" width="122" height="159" />Is it possible to run a business by giving away your stuff? It sounds counterintuitive. But hey, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) gives away much of its offerings, right? I'm actually using Google Docs to write this column, for example.</p>
<p>True, Google is perhaps an exception (it certainly helps to have a huge user base and brand name). But it is worth exploring the concept. In fact, there is an excellent book on the topic -- <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1401322905?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1401322905"><em>Free: The Future of a Radical Price</em></a><img style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1401322905" width="1" height="1" />-- which came out recently.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/entrepreneurs-journal-should-your-business-start-giving-away-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entrepreneur's Journal: Should your business start giving away stuff?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/entrepreneurs-journal-should-your-business-start-giving-away-s/">Entrepreneur's Journal: Should your business start giving away stuff?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/entrepreneurs-journal-should-your-business-start-giving-away-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19158347/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/entrepreneurs-journal-should-your-business-start-giving-away-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>5 percent rule</category><category>Bill Gurley</category><category>blogs</category><category>Chris Anderson</category><category>Entrepreneurs Journal</category><category>featured</category><category>Flickr</category><category>forums</category><category>Freemium</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Practice Fusion</category><category>Ryan Howard</category><category>Scribd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whatever happened to Carl Icahn's blog?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/whatever-happened-to-carl-icahns-blog/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/whatever-happened-to-carl-icahns-blog/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/whatever-happened-to-carl-icahns-blog/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/carlicahnsmall.jpg"  alt="" />When Carl Icahn announced the debut of his blog, <a href="http://www.icahnreport.com/">The Icahn Report</a>, there was great excitement. Finally, someone with decades of experience was going to expose the incompetence and bureaucratic self-enrichment that ensues at board meetings at most public companies in America.<br /><br />It got off to a good start with a few interesting posts -- but there's been nothing since April 23rd, and even that was just a reprint of a piece Mr. Icahn did for the Huffington Post. Before that there were a few other reprints and guest posts. The last true Icahn Report exclusive piece by the man himself came on December 17th of last year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/whatever-happened-to-carl-icahns-blog/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whatever happened to Carl Icahn's blog?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/whatever-happened-to-carl-icahns-blog/">Whatever happened to Carl Icahn's blog?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/whatever-happened-to-carl-icahns-blog/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19109004/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/whatever-happened-to-carl-icahns-blog/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blogs</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the use of social networking the key to a company's success?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-the-use-of-social-networking-key-a-companys-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-the-use-of-social-networking-key-a-companys-success/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-the-use-of-social-networking-key-a-companys-success/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="307" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/facebook-barry-summerlin.jpg" />In the wake of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) stronger-than-expected earnings, I found an interesting article about a <a href="http://www.psfk.com/2009/07/is-there-a-correlation-between-social-media-and-financial-success.html">study published</a> by wiki provider Wetpaint and the Altimeter Group. The study suggests that when a company/brand is more active with its consumers through social media (the likes of Facebook and Twitter), it is more likely that the company will have financial success. The study looked at a group of 100 companies from <em>BusinessWeek's</em> listing of the <a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/08/09/0918_best_brands/index.htm">top 100 brands of 2008</a> and their activity on Facebook, Twitter, and the likes.</p>
<p>According to the study, the brands scoring the highest on the engagement scale saw 18% revenue growth in the past year. Those brands with the least engagement saw revenue decline 6%. Companies that were the most active were classified as "mavens," while the least active were called "wallflowers."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-the-use-of-social-networking-key-a-companys-success/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is the use of social networking the key to a company's success?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-the-use-of-social-networking-key-a-companys-success/">Is the use of social networking the key to a company's success?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-the-use-of-social-networking-key-a-companys-success/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19106130/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-the-use-of-social-networking-key-a-companys-success/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Altimeter</category><category>blogs</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>facebook</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><category>SBUX</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>Starbucks</category><category>twitter</category><category>Wetpaint</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The media recession: How many blogs will go under?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/the-media-recession-how-many-blogs-will-go-under/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/the-media-recession-how-many-blogs-will-go-under/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/the-media-recession-how-many-blogs-will-go-under/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p>The layoffs are already well under way at big media companies including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) and NBCU. But, what about the new media world, all of the blogs which have been created over the last three or four years? Those not owned by large companies (Blogging Stocks is owned by AOL), may simply not make it, even though they have become remarkably popular.</p>
<p>One of the largest blog networks, Gawker, has already said it will need to cut a significant numbers of people. And, it is a profitable company. A lot of independent blogs built up staff and other costs in the anticipation that growing visitors and pageviews would allow them to benefit from increasing advertising revenue. The recession has robbed them of that hope. The blogs backed by venture capitalists may not be able to get more money. Those which never raised money and have never had access to outside capital could be in the most trouble.</p>
<p>Some blogs have been lucky. paidContent was sold to the Guardian group in the UK. Ar's Technical, a tech blog, was sold to Conde Nast. Huffington Post <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/12/01/the-huffington-post-raises-25m/">raised $25 million</a>. According to blog measurement site Technorati, Huffington is the top blog in the US. That gives it the advantage of size and branding.</p>
<p>There are several hundred blogs which have become important voices within their fields. Many of those that ramped up expenses in 2006 and 2007 are not going to make it. The revenue they were hoping for is not going to show up.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wall st.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/the-media-recession-how-many-blogs-will-go-under/">The media recession: How many blogs will go under?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://venturebeat.com/2008/12/01/the-huffington-post-raises-25m/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/the-media-recession-how-many-blogs-will-go-under/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1392144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/the-media-recession-how-many-blogs-will-go-under/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ars Technica</category><category>ArsTechnica</category><category>blogs</category><category>Huffington Post</category><category>HuffingtonPost</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PaidContent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Forbes starts big financial blog ad effort]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/forbes-starts-big-financial-blog-ad-effort/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/forbes-starts-big-financial-blog-ad-effort/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/forbes-starts-big-financial-blog-ad-effort/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a></p><p>Four hundred financial blogs. Who knew there were so many? Perhaps they have come of age now, at least as commercial entities. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120632926897458805.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "Forbes Inc., was set to announce Monday that it will start selling ads this spring for about 400 financial blogs."</p>
<p>It is an open question as to whether Forbes can make money. Some of the larger blogs in the network are still tiny. Take Xconomy, one of the blogs Forbes is pitching. <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/xconomy.com/?metric=uv">According to</a> measurement service Compete, only a little over 18,000 people visited the site last month. Another site in the network, Talking Biz News, is too small to be measured by Compete or Alexa, another audience measurement firm.</p>
<p>If Forbes can pull together 400 sites with 5,000 visitors a month, however, it can have a network with two million visitors. And that's a lot.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/forbes-starts-big-financial-blog-ad-effort/">Forbes starts big financial blog ad effort</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120632926897458805.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/forbes-starts-big-financial-blog-ad-effort/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1147292/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/forbes-starts-big-financial-blog-ad-effort/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogs</category><category>financial blogs</category><category>FinancialBlogs</category><category>Forbes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay (EBAY) future blogger Richard Brewer-Hay gets ready for eBay Ink launch]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/07/ebay-ebay-future-blogger-richard-brewer-hay-gets-ready-for-eba/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/07/ebay-ebay-future-blogger-richard-brewer-hay-gets-ready-for-eba/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/07/ebay-ebay-future-blogger-richard-brewer-hay-gets-ready-for-eba/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/ebaypicture.jpg" />One source of contention among <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) users have always been that the company does not listen, or least hear, their concerns. Well, the company is hoping to change that when it launches a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/06/smbusiness/ebay_ink.fsb/?postversion=2008030623">new blog next month, "eBay Ink."</a>, which will be manned by social media veteran Richard Brewer-Hay.<br /><br /><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/06/smbusiness/ebay_ink.fsb/?postversion=2008030623"><em>Fortune Small Business</em></a> was able to take a crack at Brewer-Hay and ask him the tough questions that many eBay users are bound to be asking themselves. It was a pretty interesting read to be sure, and according to Brewer-Hay his new blog will be completely his words with absolutely no control by eBay itself.<br /><br />eBay has definitely been under fire lately. The e-commerce giant has been accused of losing touch with its users, and acting more out of greed than anything else. The company is hoping that this new blog will give users a more direct look into the internal operations and decisions by the company. While eBay currently has blogs and forums for its users to use, these are more geared towards more traditional corporate communications.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/07/ebay-ebay-future-blogger-richard-brewer-hay-gets-ready-for-eba/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eBay (EBAY) future blogger Richard Brewer-Hay gets ready for eBay Ink launch</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/07/ebay-ebay-future-blogger-richard-brewer-hay-gets-ready-for-eba/">eBay (EBAY) future blogger Richard Brewer-Hay gets ready for eBay Ink launch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://oney.cnn.com/2008/03/06/smbusiness/ebay_ink.fsb/?postversion=2008030623>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/07/ebay-ebay-future-blogger-richard-brewer-hay-gets-ready-for-eba/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1134156/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/07/ebay-ebay-future-blogger-richard-brewer-hay-gets-ready-for-eba/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auctions</category><category>blogs</category><category>e-commerce</category><category>eBay</category><category>Ebay Ink</category><category>EbayInk</category><category>featured</category><category>management</category><category>Richard Brewer-Hay</category><category>RichardBrewer-hay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/obamapict..jpg" />Social scientists, unlike some journalists, are reluctant to label anything a trend until they've amassed and evaluated a great deal of data often over years. A journalist can always cite a lack of information, or the crush of daily (and shorter) deadlines as a reason his/her news story did not describe reality, but if a social scientist errs in a refereed-article, well let's just say the action is not conducive to career advancement. <br /><br />And that's why many social scientists are reluctant to comment on the impact of Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) run for the U.S. presidency: it's way too early to articulate informed conclusions that are likely to endure. <br /><br />Still, that's not to say that one can't comment on developments that may -- and underscoring "may" -- be indicative of a trend. And along that line, here's what we know about the Obama candidacy regarding voting behavior:<span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/">Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1112451/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2000 election</category><category>2008 election</category><category>blogs</category><category>Bush</category><category>Clinton</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Gore</category><category>interest groups</category><category>Internet</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>public policy</category><category>Republicans</category><category>social network sites</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><category>voting</category><category>voting behavior</category><category>world wide web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[10 finance blogs for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/10-finance-blogs-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/10-finance-blogs-for-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/10-finance-blogs-for-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/about-the-stock-bloggers/" rel="tag">About the Stock Bloggers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insider-blogging/" rel="tag">Insider Blogging</a></p>Over the past few months, I've received a ton of emails asking what my favorite finance blogs are (other than <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> of course). So here are my top ten favorites: <br /><br />(in alphabetical order or else I'd be killed by bloggers)<br />
<ol>
    <li><a href="http://chrisperruna.com/">ChrisPerruna.com</a> - the most well organized stock blog around, very useful analysis</li>
    <li><a href="http://dealbreaker.com">Dealbreaker.com</a> - if you want Wall Street gossip, this is where you go</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.feedthebull.com">FeedTheBull.com</a> - an up and coming site where bloggers can submit articles and users can vote their favorites</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.howardlindzon.com">HowardLindzon.com</a> - one of the godfathers of stock blogging, a real pro investor focusing on stocks making new highs</li>
    <li><a href="http://pfblogs.org/">pfblogs.org</a> - a blog comprised of posts from 1,000 different finance bloggers, say good-bye to whatever life you had</li>
</ol><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/10-finance-blogs-for-2008/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>10 finance blogs for 2008</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/10-finance-blogs-for-2008/">10 finance blogs for 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/10-finance-blogs-for-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1077007/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/10-finance-blogs-for-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogs</category><category>GOOG</category><category>stock blogs</category><category>StockBlogs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Sykes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dirty business: Hygenie's list of the ten least sanitary CEOs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Clockwise from upper left: Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen; Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak; HDNet Chairman Marc Cuban; Virgin Group Chairman Richard Branson" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/mosaic_ugly_men.jpg" />Hygenie.com</em> lists the <a href="http://hygenie.com/2007/11/11/top-10-dirty-businessmen/">Top 10 Dirty Businessmen</a> -- corporate executives whose conduct has, for one reason or another, raised serious questions about their personal hygiene. Here's the list:<br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) CEO Steve Ballmer -- Check out the picture of him sweating: Yuck!</li>
    <li>Russian billionaire Boris Berezovsky -- Face itcher!</li>
    <li>Virgin Group Chairman Richard Branson -- Streaker!<br /></li>
</ul>
<br />
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dirty business: Hygenie's list of the ten least sanitary CEOs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/">Dirty business: Hygenie's list of the ten least sanitary CEOs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hygenie.com/2007/11/11/top-10-dirty-businessmen/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1037037/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>blogs</category><category>CEOs</category><category>hygeine</category><category>Marc Cuban</category><category>MarcCuban</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is TechCrunch being Punk'd? A case of Google voodoo and Ashton Kutcher's bare torso]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/ashton-kutcher-demi-moore.jpg" alt="Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore" />I'm fascinated by the recent attempt of Australia's Virgin Mobile to apply the internet's unruly, free-for-all mindset on the real bricks and mortar world. If you missed it, Virgin used royalty-free images from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>)'s <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/sesh00/515961023/">photo-hosting site Flickr</a> in a print ad campaign, and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/01/technology/01link.html">subsequently faces some courtroom headaches</a>.<br /><br />Now comes the equally engaging inverse of that case -- a situation that could be woven <strong>only</strong> on the web. Popular technology blog TechCrunch has been threatened with litigation seeking $1.5 million, accused of misappropriating <a href="http://www.oroscopi.com/sfondi/immagini/star/ashton_kutcher_1024x768.jpg" target="_new">this professional photo of </a><a href="http://www.oroscopi.com/sfondi/immagini/star/ashton_kutcher_1024x768.jpg" target="_new">Ashton Kutcher</a>, the actor and host of MTV's <em>Punk'd</em>.<br /><br />What's the evidence? <a target="_new" href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=ashton+kutcher">This Google search</a>, apparently. Go ahead -- click the search. Assuming Google hasn't switched things around on us, the, uh, dreamy beefcake shot in question should show up at the top, promoting <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)'s image search (by the way, when did the great Googly Moogly start returning "Extra Large Images"? I gotta keep up).<br /><br />If you click on Ashton's shiny, hairless torso, you'll be taken to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/19/fifty-oomas-for-readers/#comment-1508418">this TechCrunch post</a>, regarding the voice-over-IP gizmo <a href="http://www.ooma.com/index.php">Ooma</a> (bewilderingly, Demi Moore's main man-boy is Ooma's creative director). Clicking on a Google image-search result typically takes you to the web page where you can see the picture in context.<br /><br />Damning evidence? Here's where it gets interesting, at least for those of us whose job duties include ritual prayers to Google -- <em>TechCrunch never actually used the photo</em>. What has the photographer's agency all litigation-happy actually stems from Google's rocket science.<br /><br />Apparently, a sass-talking TechCrunch reader, in responding to the Ooma post, included a link to the offending photo of Kutcher -- just a link, mind you, <em>not</em> the image itself. In indexing the TechCrunch post, Google's search math processed the linked image and associated it with the TechCrunch post (the ones and zeros at work are somewhat related to Google bombing -- if you're unfamiliar, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3298443.stm">here's a rundown of the most notorious incident</a> thereof).<br /><br />The photographer's agency had best walk away from this one -- it has no case. Or maybe Ashton's really <em>Punk'</em>ng TechCrunch, and this is all a brilliant promotion as part of his duties as Ooma's creative director. After all, had you heard about Ooma before?<br /><br /><strong>UPDATE:</strong> It figures -- <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=ashton+kutcher">the Google search</a> now links Kutcher's photo to this <a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070902113704AA9Lawj">Yahoo! Answers page</a> -- I guess it's their headache now. Learn more at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/11/being-stupid-and-litigious-is-no-way-to-go-through-life/">TechCrunch's post</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/">Is TechCrunch being Punk'd? A case of Google voodoo and Ashton Kutcher's bare torso</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/11/being-stupid-and-litigious-is-no-way-to-go-through-life/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1011359/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ashton Kutcher</category><category>AshtonKutcher</category><category>blog law</category><category>BlogLaw</category><category>blogs</category><category>copyright</category><category>law</category><category>litigation</category><category>Ooma</category><category>photos</category><category>TechCrunch</category><category>VoIP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Summerlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bloggers sell their souls for free food]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p>What's the price of a blogger's soul? In some cases, it's as little as dinner with a guest at a nice restaurant.</p>
<p>According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "As <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119162341176250617.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journal">online food sites become increasingly influential</a> in the restaurant business, chefs and owners are plying bloggers with free meals to get good write-ups. Some are also posting favorable reviews about themselves on popular Web sites or becoming Internet scribes."</p>
<p>This is as clear a violation of journalistic ethics as you will find. Real food critics dine anonymously and pay their own bills -- a known critic is likely to receive special treatment, which of course could make their experience less than indicative of what their readers can expect.</p>
<p>And then there's another problem: Is it really possible to be objective in a review when you aren't feeling the sting of having paid for it?</p>
<p>Blogs are certainly giving the traditional media a run for their money. But in order for the coup to be successful, they will have to adopt some of the ethical standards of the traditional media. For what it's worth, this is the policy for all blogs in the <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/">Weblogs Inc.</a> (owned by AOL; includes BloggingStocks) network:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Bloggers do not receive free products or services</strong> from the companies they write about. </li>
    <li>Bloggers do accept review units (e.g., a new cell phone at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/">Engadget</a>, a video game at <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/">Joystiq</a>, or a week-long car loan at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/">Autoblog</a>); however, when they're finished reviewing products, they return these items to the manufacturers. If the manufacturers do not take the items back, we give them to our readers. This is the same editorial policy as the <em>New York Times</em> or <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. </li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/">Bloggers sell their souls for free food</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119162341176250617.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journal>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1006833/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Autoblog</category><category>Bloggers</category><category>BloggingStocks</category><category>blogs</category><category>Engadget</category><category>ethics</category><category>food reviews</category><category>inthenews</category><category>journalistic integrity</category><category>Joystiq</category><category>Weblogs Inc.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What does Reuters have against financial blogs?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/what-does-reuters-have-against-financial-blogs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/what-does-reuters-have-against-financial-blogs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/what-does-reuters-have-against-financial-blogs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reuters-group-plc-american-depositary-shares/rtrsy/nas">Reuters</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reuters-group-plc-american-depositary-shares/rtrsy/nas">RTRSY</a>) has a blog section at the bottom of most business stories at<a href="http://www.reuters.com"> Reuters.com</a>. It is called Business Blog Posts, and it is powered by Blogburst. Blogburst is part of blog syndication service Pluck. And, Reuters is one of Pluck's owners.</p>
<p>Complicated? Yes.</p>
<p>The business blogs that Reuters runs are mostly small, one-person operations like Phil's Stock World and Captain Currency. Some, like The Kirk Report and Bill Cara, are well regarded. But, Reuters does them a disservice. It keeps the traffic for their content when it runs on Reuters.com. So, Reuters gets the ad revenue on those pages. The bloggers get their names on Reuters, and a link back to their sites, which is probably rarely used. </p>
<p>It is interesting to note that none of the big business blog sites like SeekingAlpha or Ticker Sense run in the Reuters program. They understand that the deal is good for Reuters and bad for the blogs. They aren't prepared to let Reuters compete with them for eyeballs using their own blog content. </p>
<p>It is a shame that Reuters has handled bloggers this way. Many other media outlets like <a href="http://www.wsj.com">WSJ.com</a> and <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> comment on blogs but send traffic to the bloggers. Reuters has decided not to give the little guy a leg up.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St. which was approached about the Reuters program and turned the company down. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/what-does-reuters-have-against-financial-blogs/">What does Reuters have against financial blogs?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://reuters/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/what-does-reuters-have-against-financial-blogs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1005207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/what-does-reuters-have-against-financial-blogs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill cera</category><category>BillCera</category><category>blogburst</category><category>blogging</category><category>blogs</category><category>business journalism</category><category>business news</category><category>BusinessJournalism</category><category>BusinessNews</category><category>captain currency</category><category>CaptainCurrency</category><category>financial blogs</category><category>financial news</category><category>FinancialBlogs</category><category>FinancialNews</category><category>internet advertising</category><category>InternetAdvertising</category><category>phil's stock world</category><category>Phil'sStockWorld</category><category>reuters</category><category>RTRSY</category><category>The kirk report</category><category>TheKirkReport</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Huffington Post wants to be more like a newspaper -- Why?!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/huffington-post-wants-to-be-more-like-a-newspaper-why/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/huffington-post-wants-to-be-more-like-a-newspaper-why/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/huffington-post-wants-to-be-more-like-a-newspaper-why/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p>As newspapers nearly everywhere fret over the threat that bloggers pose to their very existence, one of the best and best-known blogs out there has decided she wants to have more in common with traditional media. The Huffington Post, which sports 43 full-time employees and another <em>1,800 bloggers</em>, has decided that it wants to become an "all-inclusive digital newspaper," <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/news/2007/09/us_the_huffington_post_to_become_an_onli.php">according</a> to the Editors Weblog. Best-known as a left-leaning political blog, co-founder Arianna Huffington wants to make it more balanced, and has even suggested she would like have someone like Karl Rove join the staff.<br /><br />The Huffington Post could give traditional news sites a run for their money because it links to contents from numerous other sites. It's status as a sort of news <span style="font-style: italic;">'zine</span> allows it to provide readers with a sort of "best of the web" news coverage -- a one stop-source for everything (some readers think) they need to read.<br /><br />It remains to be seen whether The Huffington Post will be able to make the crossover into becoming a more "fair and balanced" media outlet. The founder, after all, has a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianna_Huffington">history of switching sides</a> as it suits the prevailing political winds. <br /><br />And we all love our media "fair and balanced," don't we?  We all turn to Fox News (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a>. NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) as a place to watch right-wing whack jobs spouting their demagoguery, but no one would ever take it seriously as a source of information. Right? Right?!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/huffington-post-wants-to-be-more-like-a-newspaper-why/">Huffington Post wants to be more like a newspaper -- Why?!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.editorsweblog.org/news/2007/09/us_the_huffington_post_to_become_an_onli.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/huffington-post-wants-to-be-more-like-a-newspaper-why/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1003591/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/huffington-post-wants-to-be-more-like-a-newspaper-why/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Arianna Huffington</category><category>AriannaHuffington</category><category>Blogs</category><category>Huffington</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should VCs get bloggy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/should-vcs-get-bloggy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/should-vcs-get-bloggy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/should-vcs-get-bloggy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img width="211" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="64" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/boston.jpg" style="width: 211px; height: 64px;" />For many entrepreneurs, the VC world is a mystery. What do VCs really want? What are the valuation metrics? What are the key terms in a shareholder's agreement?</p>
<p>It's all complex stuff (even for some VCs) and, yes, there are numerous VCs who are blogging about these issues.</p>
<p>Is it a good thing? Well, there's a <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2007/09/23/in_venture_capitalism_a_growing_rift_over_blogs/">piece</a> on the topic on Boston.com. So far, it seems the answer is "yes." </p>
<p>After all, if entrepreneurs have accurate guidelines, it means that the parties won't waste time. Something else: certain companies - that may provide tremendous benefits - can get the funding they need.</p>
<p>Oh, a blog can also bring more deal flow for VCs, and in light of the competition, this can be a nice advantage.</p>
<p>What's more, VC blogs can be a good source for those who aren't looking for capital. After all, VCs must keep a pulse on the latest-and-greatest. So, they often have some intriguing opinions.</p>
<p>If you want to check out some of the VC blogs, click <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com/vcarticle.htm?ArticleID=20">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/should-vcs-get-bloggy/">Should VCs get bloggy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2007/09/23/in_venture_capitalism_a_growing_rift_over_blogs/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/should-vcs-get-bloggy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/996922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/should-vcs-get-bloggy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blogs</category><category>VCs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[M&amp;A blog looks into the crystal ball]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/manda-blog-looks-into-the-crystal-ball/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/manda-blog-looks-into-the-crystal-ball/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/manda-blog-looks-into-the-crystal-ball/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img height="60" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/maprof.bmp" width="266" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />As an M&amp;A junkie, I'm always interested in cool blogs on the topic. The problem is: they're not many. But over the past couple months, I've been regularly following the <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/">M&amp;A Law Prof Blog</a>.</p>
<p>The blogger is Steven Davidoff, who is an assistant Professor of Law at Wayne State University. Before this, he was an attorney at Shearman &amp; Sterling. Oh, and he is also the founder of Wasabi Sushi.</p>
<p>On his blog, Davidoff goes into detail on the intricacies of M&amp;A transactions, covering things like Material Adverse Change clauses, tender offers, poison pills and so on. It's great stuff.</p>
<p>Well, he has a must-read <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2007/09/fall-ma-preview.html ">M&amp;A Fall Preview</a>. Basically, the private equity crowd is going to be very busy with restructuring deals, renegotiations -- and perhaps some litigation. That's good news for strategic buyers (and, of course, deal attorneys). Also, it's a good bet that deal making in Europe will continue apace. </p>
<p>All in all, the M&amp;A Law Prof Blog is standout. So, if you want to increase your deal-making IQ, definitely check out the site.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><em><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" width="1" border="0" /> and</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" width="1" border="0" />. <em>He also operates </em><a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com"><em>DealProfiles.com</em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/manda-blog-looks-into-the-crystal-ball/">M&amp;A blog looks into the crystal ball</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/manda-blog-looks-into-the-crystal-ball/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/984547/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/manda-blog-looks-into-the-crystal-ball/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogs</category><category>mergers and acquisitions</category><category>private equity</category><category>Steven Davidoff</category><category>Wasabi Sushi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Discovery throws down some green for TreeHugger.com]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/discovery-throws-down-some-green-for-treehugger-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/discovery-throws-down-some-green-for-treehugger-com/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/discovery-throws-down-some-green-for-treehugger-com/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p><img height="54" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/treehugger.jpg" width="243" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />As the name implies, <a href="http://www.treehugger.com">TreeHugger.com</a> is the place to get "green news, solutions, and product information."<br /><br />And now the company is getting <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com/maprofile.htm?MADealID=35">some green</a> from Discovery Communications - that is, in a buyout. The terms have not been disclosed (but the rumors have the purchase price between $10 million to $15 million).<br /><br />TreeHugger.com is in the form of a blog. But there are also videos, newsletters and user generated content areas.<br /><br />And it's a popular destination. In June, there were 3.6 million pageviews and 1.94 million unique visitors. Even Oprah Winfrey is a fan.<br /><br />TreeHugger.com also has some good-natured humor. According to the site: "TreeHuggers know that you don't need to run off to live with the wolves to contribute to the betterment of Mother Nature. (We do, however, prescribe this to anyone with strong urges to pursue cave art and moon howling). TreeHuggers live in the 21st century, make quotidian decisions, consume, have fun and maintain their aesthetic je ne sais quoi."<br /><br />Oh, and TreeHugger.com has no issue doing some dealmaking, either.<br /><br />And, if you want to check out some more recent M&amp;A deals, click <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com/ma.htm">here</a>.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/discovery-throws-down-some-green-for-treehugger-com/">Discovery throws down some green for TreeHugger.com</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dealprofiles.com/maprofile.htm?MADealID=35>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/discovery-throws-down-some-green-for-treehugger-com/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/955896/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/discovery-throws-down-some-green-for-treehugger-com/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogs</category><category>deals</category><category>Discovery Communications</category><category>DiscoveryCommunications</category><category>TreeHugger</category><category>TreeHugger.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC Chairman is a fan of blogs!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/16/sec-chairman-opines-on-blogs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/16/sec-chairman-opines-on-blogs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/16/sec-chairman-opines-on-blogs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>In honor of the tenth anniversary of blogging, The Wall Street Journal interview a handful of noteworthy minds on the impact of blogging on society. For investors, the most interesting comments came from SEC Chairman Chris Cox: </p>
<p><em>As investors strive to make sense of the ever-higher mountains of data that we're buried under, the services of bloggers, whom we can imagine sitting at home in their pajamas trolling the Internet for us, free of charge, are likely to be an increasingly consequential addition to the investor's tool kit...</em></p>
<p><em>Do bloggers portend more lasting ramifications for the securities world? But of course. Shareholders are on the move, and technology has given them a cheaper and more-effective means to communicate. From improved price discovery to better corporate governance, investors, markets, managements and boards will never be the same.</em></p>
<p>It's encouraging to see that Chairman of the SEC recognizes the positive impact that blogs can have on financial markets, and all of us at BloggingStocks are thrilled to be "sitting at home in pajamas trolling the internet for you, free of charge."</p>
<p>His comment that bloggers can lead to "better corporate governance" is particularly interesting. Bloggers have the space to rant about executives in a way that few print publications to do. In the past, I've used BloggingStocks to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/the-bloggingactivist-increasing-shareholder-value-at-adams-golf/">try my hand at shareholder activism</a> involving a company I own shares of, and I plan on doing more of that in the not too distant future.</p>
<p>Bloggers like <a href="http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/">Gary Weiss</a> have used the internet to expose fraud and corporate shenanigans.</p>
<p>There's no question that blogging has already made a big impact on the investment world and, as it gains acceptance (The SEC chairman endorsing blogging!), I would look for that influence to increase. <script language=javascript type=text/javascript charset=ISO-8859-1> <!-- com.dowjones.video.articlePlayer.draw("1116285644","320","290","left","video icon", "Scott Karp: Publishing 2.0") //--> </script></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/16/sec-chairman-opines-on-blogs/">SEC Chairman is a fan of blogs!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118436667045766268.html?mod=home_we_banner_left>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/16/sec-chairman-opines-on-blogs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/940913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/16/sec-chairman-opines-on-blogs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blogs</category><category>Chris Cox</category><category>ChrisCox</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reuters starts financial blog network]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/reuters-starts-financial-blog-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/reuters-starts-financial-blog-network/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/reuters-starts-financial-blog-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tri/" rel="tag">Thomson Reuters (TRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtrsy/" rel="tag">Reuters Group ADS (RTRSY)</a></p><p>In a sign of the increasing importance of high-end financial blogs, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reuters-group-plc-american-depositary-shares/rtrsy/nas">Reuters Group Plc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reuters-group-plc-american-depositary-shares/rtrsy/nas">RTRSY</a>) is starting a new network of the sites. Or, it could be that the Reuters business development people have down time because of its upcoming purchase by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-thomson-corporation/toc/nys">Thomson Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-thomson-corporation/toc/nys">TOC</a>).</p>
<p>The offer that Reuters is making to a number of high-end blogs is that it will link to the participating sites from Reuters.com, offer <font size="2">free access to selected Reuters Headlines (RSS or Headline Wizard) and Reuters Video Player to publish Reuters News, and get 30% of an advertising program that the big financial services company will manage.</font></p>
<p>In return, each blog agrees to execute contracts with comScore and NetRatings to assign its traffic to Reuters.com. NetRatings ranks Reuters.com as the No.7 financial website with unique visitors of 6.1 million in May.</p>
<p>Reuters may be trying to match blog initiatives at media outlets including <a href="http://www.ft.com/home/us">FT.com</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/home/us">WSJ.com</a>, and <a href="http://www.aol.com/">AOL.com.</a></p>
<p>Either Reuters has a very high regard for financial blogs or it needs to pump up its audience ratings.</p>
<p>Disclosure: 24/7 Wall St. was approached by Reuters about this opportunity. </p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a principal at <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/">24/7 Wall St</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/reuters-starts-financial-blog-network/">Reuters starts financial blog network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/reuters-starts-financial-blog-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/936236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/reuters-starts-financial-blog-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blog networks</category><category>blogging</category><category>BlogNetworks</category><category>blogs</category><category>business news</category><category>BusinessNews</category><category>financial blogs</category><category>FinancialBlogs</category><category>journalism</category><category>reuters</category><category>rtrsy</category><category>thomson</category><category>thomson financial</category><category>ThomsonFinancial</category><category>toc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
