<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ambac Financial and MBIA Inc. plunge on Moody's downgrade warning]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p><p>Thanks to a downgrade warning from Moody's, bond insurers <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac Financial Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) are sitting out today's massive rally in financial stocks. Late Thursday, Moody's announced that it may downgrade the duo's ratings by more than one notch due to rising losses from subprime mortgage debt. So far today, the news has prompted a 7% drop in MBIA shares, and a slump of nearly 8% for Ambac.</p>
<p>In a statement, Moody's said, "Because both Ambac and MBIA are meaningfully exposed to the risk of U.S. subprime mortgages and other residential mortgage products, the revised assumptions are expected to have a significant impact on the firms' capital positions and multi-notch downgrades are possible." Specifically, the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/moodys-puts-mbia-units-ratings-under/rfid141309732">"A2"</a> insurance financial strength rating of MBIA's insurance unit is under review, as is the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/moodys-places-ambac-ratings-under-review/rfid141308787">"Aa3"</a> insurance financial strength rating for Ambac.</p>
<p>Neither bond insurer seems particularly pleased by Moody's decision. Jay Brown, chairman and CEO of MBIA, said that the review reflects "inherent flaws" in the ratings company's logic, and added that his company has a capital cushion of more than $3 billion. Ambac's chairman and chief executive, Michael Callen, noted his "surprise and disappointment" at the news, and added that "Moody's ratings actions continue to cause confusion, uncertainty and the risk of material economic damange if their assumptions ultimately prove to be too onerous."</p>
<p>Despite today's plunge, MBI and ABK remain poised atop support from their respective 10-week moving averages. Both bond insurers have endured massive price plunges amid subprime-related fallout, but they've recently rebounded. Ambac now boasts a 60-day relative-strength reading of 381% versus the S&amp;P 500 Index, while MBIA's is 312%.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>. She is featured in the video series <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx">Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</a> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/">Ambac Financial and MBIA Inc. plunge on Moody's downgrade warning</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1318871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac Financial Group</category><category>AmbacFinancialGroup</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>downgrade</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA Inc.</category><category>MbiaInc.</category><category>Moodys</category><category>ratings</category><category>subprime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: Ambac Financial tops the list]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/worst-10-year-performers-ambac-financial-tops-the-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/worst-10-year-performers-ambac-financial-tops-the-list/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/worst-10-year-performers-ambac-financial-tops-the-list/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-ambac-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade?icid=100214839x1206443214x1200311100">this series</a>, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.</em></p>
<p>The No. 1 and No. 2 spots on our underperformers' list both belong to bond insurers. Along with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac Financial Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>) has been battered bloody during the past 12 months. Prior to that, the security was riding high on a years-long uptrend, before some of its more unsavory investments came to light amid the subprime crisis.</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At No. 1 on our list of SPX losers, ABK lost a staggering 97% of its value during the 10-year period that concluded on June 30, 2008. From its May 2007 peak of $96.10, ABK is down 98%.</p>
<p>Ambac's story is not too different from that of MBIA. The company enjoyed triple-A ratings, even as its portfolio grew increasingly more risky under the weight of subprime-linked debt. As of December 2007, no insurer was more exposed to bad mortgage debt than Ambac -- the company insured $22 billion of subprime mortgage debt, nearly double the exposure of MBIA.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/worst-10-year-performers-ambac-financial-tops-the-list/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: Ambac Financial tops the list</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/worst-10-year-performers-ambac-financial-tops-the-list/">Worst 10-year performers: Ambac Financial tops the list</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/worst-10-year-performers-ambac-financial-tops-the-list/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262939/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/worst-10-year-performers-ambac-financial-tops-the-list/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac Financial</category><category>AmbacFinancial</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing bell: Retail and tech ignore woes and oil gains]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/closing-bell-retail-and-tech-ignore-woes-and-oil-gains/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/closing-bell-retail-and-tech-ignore-woes-and-oil-gains/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/closing-bell-retail-and-tech-ignore-woes-and-oil-gains/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cien/" rel="tag">Ciena Corp (CIEN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brcm/" rel="tag">Broadcom Corp'A' (BRCM)</a></p>Shares were higher today after the weekly jobless claims were reported as 357,000, down 18,000 from last week. While new claims are down, the four week average of those filing for benefits was up to 3.086 million, the highest level since March 2004. The good news is that the markets largely ignored that S&amp;P downgrade of bond insurers today. The stock market even ignored a $5.00 rise per barrel in oil today. Here are the unofficial closing levels today:<br /><br />DJIA 12,598.10 (+207.62)<br />S&amp;P500 1,403.30 (+26.10)<br />NASDAQ 2,549.94 (+46.80)<br />10YR-TNote 4.03% +(0.09%)<br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/06/the-52-week-l-3.html">52-WEEK LOWS</a><br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/06/top-10-pre-ma-3.html">TOP 10 ANALYST CALLS</a><br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/broadcom-corporation/brcm/nas">Broadcom Corp. (NASDAQ: BRCM</a>) was an example of just how strong today was by being up almost 3% at $28.90 late in the day. If you read trough the co-founder and former CEO's <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/06/broadcoms-great.html">indictment charges</a> you might think shareholders would have gone the other way.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/closing-bell-retail-and-tech-ignore-woes-and-oil-gains/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing bell: Retail and tech ignore woes and oil gains</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/closing-bell-retail-and-tech-ignore-woes-and-oil-gains/">Closing bell: Retail and tech ignore woes and oil gains</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/closing-bell-retail-and-tech-ignore-woes-and-oil-gains/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1217059/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/closing-bell-retail-and-tech-ignore-woes-and-oil-gains/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alltell</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>broadcom</category><category>ciena corporation</category><category>CienaCorporation</category><category>verizon wireless</category><category>VerizonWireless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ambac deal rumor bails out Dow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/ambac-deal-rumor-bails-out-dow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/ambac-deal-rumor-bails-out-dow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/ambac-deal-rumor-bails-out-dow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a66iGm8rdzbg&amp;refer=home"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstreepicture.jpg" />Bloomberg News</a></em> reports that a bailout of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys"><strong>Ambac Financial Group</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>) is going to be announced next week. Ambac rallied on speculation a recapitalization would salvage the second-largest bond guarantor's AAA credit rating. The Dow is rising -- going from being down 120 points earlier in the day to being up 97. Charlie Gasparino, CNBC's on-air editor, suggests that the deal could be announced next Monday or Tuesday. </p>
<p>Since no details are available, I think the market's movement reflects panicked short covering before the weekend. If Gasparino is right about this, it could help limit worries that have sent the market down almost 13% from its October 2007 high. As I posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/will-wilbur-ross-rescue-bond-insurance/">here</a>, the bond insurance market is a critical support system for the securitization industry. If it can retain its AAA rating, there might be some hope for limiting the downside damage.</p>
<p>We'll soon know whether this rumor is true. </p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the cohan="" letter=""></the></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in Ambac securities.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/ambac-deal-rumor-bails-out-dow/">Ambac deal rumor bails out Dow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a66iGm8rdzbg&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/ambac-deal-rumor-bails-out-dow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1122384/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/ambac-deal-rumor-bails-out-dow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>AMBAC</category><category>ambac bailout</category><category>AmbacBailout</category><category>Bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nyse</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MBIA calls latest Ackman proposal 'no more credible' than open-source model]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/mbia-calls-latest-ackman-proposal-no-more-credible-than-open-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/mbia-calls-latest-ackman-proposal-no-more-credible-than-open-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/mbia-calls-latest-ackman-proposal-no-more-credible-than-open-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstreepicture.jpg" alt="" />Bond insurer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MBIA</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MBI</a>) said hedge fund founder William Ackman's proposal for a restructuring of U.S. bond insurers is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120354808375481199.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">no more credible or viable</a> than his flawed open-source model, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported [subscription required].<br /><br />"Like Mr. Ackman's open-source model, his statements in the media and the barrage of letters he has sent to regulators and the rating agencies -- which contain half truths, innuendo and faulty analysis -- this proposal is simply a continuation of Mr. Ackman's campaign to profit from his short positions and credit default swaps in the bond insurance industry," <a href="http://investor.mbia.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=88095&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1110642&amp;highlight=">MBIA said</a>. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MBIA</a> added that it is continuing to work with New York State Superintendent of Insurance Eric Dinallo and his advisers to evaluate options for maintaining the highest rating for its policyholders.<br /> <br /> Furthermore, MBIA, the nation's largest bond insurer, said it agrees with a spokesman for the New York Insurance Department who said Ackman's proposal would split the company and likely lead to a substantial downgrade for the structured side.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/mbia-calls-latest-ackman-proposal-no-more-credible-than-open-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MBIA calls latest Ackman proposal 'no more credible' than open-source model</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/mbia-calls-latest-ackman-proposal-no-more-credible-than-open-s/">MBIA calls latest Ackman proposal 'no more credible' than open-source model</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/mbia-calls-latest-ackman-proposal-no-more-credible-than-open-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1120811/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/mbia-calls-latest-ackman-proposal-no-more-credible-than-open-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Dinallo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>New York State Insurance Department</category><category>Spitzer</category><category>U.S. Federa Reserve</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><category>U.s.Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Auction rates remain high as markets await word on bond insurers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/auction-rates-remain-high-as-markets-await-word-on-bond-insurers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/auction-rates-remain-high-as-markets-await-word-on-bond-insurers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/auction-rates-remain-high-as-markets-await-word-on-bond-insurers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p>The University of Pittsburgh opted to buy back $92 million in bonds after market rates on some of its existing auction-rate debt topped 17% last week -- threatening to add $605,000 in weekly interest costs, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120338293506475781.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">reported</a> Tuesday (subscription required).
<p>Further, the university said it may make offers to buy back almost $340 million more in debt, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=alg9g8vGRoV4">Bloomberg News reported Tuesday.</a> Other good-credit institutions that have faced higher auction-market interest rates include The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Georgetown University and Carnegie Hall. </p>
<p>Auction-rate securities are long-term bonds that mimic short-term debt. Interest rates are reset in auctions held regularly, usually between seven and 35 days. Typically, municipalities, student-loan providers and museums, among others, use this type of instrument because it gives them a long-term credit source at short-term interest rates. </p>
<p><strong>Jittery auction-rate market</strong></p>
<p>However, these are not typical times for the credit markets. Auctions have failed when investors refused to buy the securities, and investment banks such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">C</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GS</a>), already laden with unwanted debt and trying to rebuild their balance sheets, refused to provide capital to support the market. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/auction-rates-remain-high-as-markets-await-word-on-bond-insurers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Auction rates remain high as markets await word on bond insurers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/auction-rates-remain-high-as-markets-await-word-on-bond-insurers/">Auction rates remain high as markets await word on bond insurers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/auction-rates-remain-high-as-markets-await-word-on-bond-insurers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1118830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/auction-rates-remain-high-as-markets-await-word-on-bond-insurers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac</category><category>auction rate securities</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>bond market</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>New York State Department of Insurance</category><category>Spitzer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economists say auction-rate bond failures underscore need for MBIA, Ambac re-capitalization]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/economists-say-auction-rate-bond-failures-underscore-need-for-mb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/economists-say-auction-rate-bond-failures-underscore-need-for-mb/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/economists-say-auction-rate-bond-failures-underscore-need-for-mb/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/mbi-mbia-logo.jpg" alt="" />Amid calls for disclosure of more information on bidding for auction-rate bonds after dealers stopped buying the securities, two economists told BloggingStocks Friday that the problem of a lack of investor demand speaks directly to the need to re-capitalize bond insurers MBIA and Ambac.<br /><br />"The problem is not merely a lack of demand for bonds. The problem is that institutional investors are shunning these investments because they are concerned about a lack of available insurance for this debt and related credit market uncertainty, which underscores the need to address the liquidity concerns of MBIA and Ambac," economist David H. Wang said Friday. <br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/ambac.jpg" /><strong>MBIA, Ambac: two linchpins</strong><br /><br />The bond insurers, Wang said, are two linchpins of the bond market [municipal, corporate], and, by extension, of the financial markets. <br /><br />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MBIA</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MBI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Ambac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ABK</a>) have lost more than 70% of their value in the past six months, as investors have fled them amid concern that the two do not have sufficient capital to fund insurance policies for mortgage-backed and collateralized debt obligations held by banks and institutions. MBIA and Ambac executives have rejected the accusations, arguing that they have sufficient capital to fund claims and can modify/improve their business models, long-term, aided by re-capitalization. MBIA fell 80 cents to $11.82 and Ambac fell 45 cents to $10.08 in Friday afternoon trading.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/economists-say-auction-rate-bond-failures-underscore-need-for-mb/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economists say auction-rate bond failures underscore need for MBIA, Ambac re-capitalization</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/economists-say-auction-rate-bond-failures-underscore-need-for-mb/">Economists say auction-rate bond failures underscore need for MBIA, Ambac re-capitalization</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/economists-say-auction-rate-bond-failures-underscore-need-for-mb/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1116289/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/economists-say-auction-rate-bond-failures-underscore-need-for-mb/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>bond market</category><category>CDOs</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Dinallo</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>interest rates</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgages</category><category>New York State Department of Insurance</category><category>Port Authority of NY and NJ</category><category>Spitzer</category><category>State of New York</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spitzer says bond insurance problem could be 'financial tsunami']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/spitzer-says-bond-insurance-problem-could-be-financial-tsunami/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/spitzer-says-bond-insurance-problem-could-be-financial-tsunami/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/spitzer-says-bond-insurance-problem-could-be-financial-tsunami/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/spitzerpic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />New York governor Eliot Spitzer may be a lawyer by training, but he must harbor secret aspirations of becoming a financier. He will tell Congress today that the problems at bond insurance companies could become "financial tsunami" if they are not fixed.</p>
<p>Spitzer has a point. As <em>Reuters </em><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN1340093520080214">points out</a>, "if insurers are downgraded by ratings agencies, investors that can only hold top-rated bonds may have to sell billions of dollars of securities, lifting borrowing costs for cities and consumers alike." Banks might also have to write-down the value of any of these bonds that they hold on their balance sheets.</p>
<p>The debate now is whether the private sector should handle this on its own with banks including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) providing financing to insurance firms such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>). The banks already have credit problems that could make those investments difficult.</p>
<p>If Spitzer truly wants to avoid what be feels will be a catastrophe he needs to say that New York State will provide the bond insurers some financial guarantees and capital. Then the banks are likely to come in.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/spitzer-says-bond-insurance-problem-could-be-financial-tsunami/">Spitzer says bond insurance problem could be 'financial tsunami'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/spitzer-says-bond-insurance-problem-could-be-financial-tsunami/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1114858/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/spitzer-says-bond-insurance-problem-could-be-financial-tsunami/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abk</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>eliot spitzer</category><category>EliotSpitzer</category><category>gov. eliot spitzer</category><category>Gov.EliotSpitzer</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed may cut rates again to lower borrowing costs for corporations, households]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/fed-may-cut-rates-again-to-lower-borrowing-costs-for-corporation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/fed-may-cut-rates-again-to-lower-borrowing-costs-for-corporation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/fed-may-cut-rates-again-to-lower-borrowing-costs-for-corporation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The Fed may have to lower interest rates again because previous cuts have failed to lower borrowing costs for many corporations and households, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=awDOsJJfFbrs&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Wednesday.</a><br /><br />Despite 125 basis points of rate reductions by the Fed over a nine day span in January 2008, companies are paying more to borrow now than before the cuts, data compiled by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MER</a>) indicated, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=awDOsJJfFbrs&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported.</a> <br /><br />Further, banks have been forced to abandon loan sales, student loan enterprises have had to postpone auctions, and even major municipalities have had to increase the interest rate they offer on bonds to attract investors reluctant to take on additional debt instruments amid subprime asset defaults and constrained credit market conditions. Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Wednesday in a normal market the Fed's rate cuts would have lowered short-term borrowing costs and enhanced liquidity. It has not happened, which all but guarantees another rate cut by the Fed on March 18. <br /><br />"We're definitely going to need another shot [interest rate cut]," Wang said. "The only question now is whether the Fed goes 25 basis points or 50. Credit market conditions are way too constrained. It's one thing to have a bond deal on a young company deferred or priced differently on risk factors, but this business of Sallie Mae's auctions failing to generating interest is just a ridiculous situation, frankly. It shows just how irrational the market has become, short-term."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/fed-may-cut-rates-again-to-lower-borrowing-costs-for-corporation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed may cut rates again to lower borrowing costs for corporations, households</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/fed-may-cut-rates-again-to-lower-borrowing-costs-for-corporation/">Fed may cut rates again to lower borrowing costs for corporations, households</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/fed-may-cut-rates-again-to-lower-borrowing-costs-for-corporation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1114460/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/fed-may-cut-rates-again-to-lower-borrowing-costs-for-corporation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond insurers</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Fed</category><category>GDP</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>term auction facility</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Global economic confidence drops for third straight month]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/global-economic-confidence-drops-for-third-straight-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/global-economic-confidence-drops-for-third-straight-month/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/global-economic-confidence-drops-for-third-straight-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Confidence in the global economy fell for the third straight month in February 2008, as North Americans became more pessimistic about the slowing U.S. economy and its impact on global growth, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aGmWRlYw7qAY&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Wednesday.</a><br /><br />The Bloomberg Professional Global Confidence Index fell to 14.3 in February 2008 from 21.0 in January 2008, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aGmWRlYw7qAY&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported.</a> Further, although North America respondents were the most pessimistic about economic conditions in their region, Asia respondents were the most pessimistic about the global economy. <br /><br />Global equity markets have lost more than $6 trillion this year as investors fled financial and cyclical stocks on fears mortgage and mortgage-asset defaults will continue to slow both U.S. economic growth and also restrict access to credit that corporations need to conduct business and expand operations.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/global-economic-confidence-drops-for-third-straight-month/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Global economic confidence drops for third straight month</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/global-economic-confidence-drops-for-third-straight-month/">Global economic confidence drops for third straight month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/global-economic-confidence-drops-for-third-straight-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1114142/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/global-economic-confidence-drops-for-third-straight-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac</category><category>Asia</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>bond market</category><category>bonds</category><category>credit markets</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>Europe</category><category>GDP</category><category>global economy</category><category>global growth</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Latin American</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA</category><category>Middle East</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. economy's success in 2008 may depend on 'success' definition]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/u-s-economys-success-in-2008-may-depend-on-success-definitio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/u-s-economys-success-in-2008-may-depend-on-success-definitio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/u-s-economys-success-in-2008-may-depend-on-success-definitio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><div align="justify">FT columnist and economist <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8bd26b04-ce9e-11dc-877a-000077b07658.html">Martin Wolf</a> astutely observes that in the rush to evaluate whether the U.S. Federal Reserve's monetary policy easing and the U.S. Congress' $150 billion stimulus plan will work, we need to decide what 'will work' means. <br />
<div align="justify"><br /></div>
Using the Fed's definition, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8bd26b04-ce9e-11dc-877a-000077b07658.html">Wolf says,</a> the monetary/fiscal policy will have been judged a success if policymakers have eliminated any risk of a collapse into a Japanese-style deflation. (In the late 1980s, Japan fell into a decade-long deflation period after the collapse of a real estate boom and related asset prices.) Conversely, Wolf notes, Congressional officials, particularly those up for re-election, may not view the stimulus policy as a success unless the U.S. economy is growing at a healthy rate, at/above 3% GDP growth.<br /><br /><strong>'Will work' bar too low? </strong><br /><br />The above, of course, leads to the natural question of "Is the 'will work' bar too low?" Economist David H. Wang says no. <br /></div><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/u-s-economys-success-in-2008-may-depend-on-success-definitio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. economy's success in 2008 may depend on 'success' definition</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/u-s-economys-success-in-2008-may-depend-on-success-definitio/">U.S. economy's success in 2008 may depend on 'success' definition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/u-s-economys-success-in-2008-may-depend-on-success-definitio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1108398/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/u-s-economys-success-in-2008-may-depend-on-success-definitio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond insurers</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Fed</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing</category><category>median home price</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>subprime</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><category>term auction facility</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MBIA bets it can keep AAA rating]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/mbia-bets-it-can-keep-aaa-rating/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/mbia-bets-it-can-keep-aaa-rating/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/mbia-bets-it-can-keep-aaa-rating/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MBIA Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MBI</a>) <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mbia-loses-23-billion-on-write-downs/n20080131102609990054">remains confident that it can keep its AAA </a>ratings and brushed aside suggestions by hedge fund investor William Ackman that it's on shaky financial ground.<br /><br /> "Our anticipation in response to the turn in the market has been singular among the monoline insurers, putting us in the best position to maintain our AAA ratings among the large public companies," <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120175741480431553.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">The Wall Street Journal</a></em> quotes CEO Gary Dutton as saying.<br /><br />Those bullish comments were enough to give a lift to MBIA's shares, which are down almost 80% over the past year, along with rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac Financial Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>), down almost 87% for the year. For now, the market ignored the $2.3 billion fourth quarter loss which included a whopping $3.5 billion in write down in its credit derivatives portfolio.<br /><br />Ackman, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/gc06/idUSWEN366720080130">who is pledging his short-selling profits to charity</a>, argues that the Armonk, NY-based company faces losses of $11.63 billion from asset-based securities nearly equal to the $11.61 billion losses looming at Ambac. MBIA , which says it's on track to raise $2 billion, scoffs any suggestions that it may be insolvent. CFO Chuck Chaplin told the paper that it has enough capital for the next six years.<br /><br />Is this a sucker's rally or the real deal?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/mbia-bets-it-can-keep-aaa-rating/">MBIA bets it can keep AAA rating</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120175741480431553.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/mbia-bets-it-can-keep-aaa-rating/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1103352/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/mbia-bets-it-can-keep-aaa-rating/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>ambac</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mbi</category><category>MBIA</category><category>muni bonds</category><category>MuniBonds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How much money to save the bond insurers?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/26/how-much-money-to-save-the-bond-insurers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/26/how-much-money-to-save-the-bond-insurers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/26/how-much-money-to-save-the-bond-insurers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p>New York State Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo has been twisting the arms of major banks to get them to put up $15 billion or so to bail out <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac Financial Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA</a>). If the muni bond insurers cannot maintain their high ratings with agencies like S&amp;P, the value of the bonds that they insure could drop sharply, leading to more write-offs at Wall Street firms.</p>
<p>S&amp;P has now said that the $15 billion may be just fine. "The dollars we understand that he's talking about -- $5 billion immediately and $15 billion ultimately -- those are substantial numbers and I think could give us a fair degree of comfort relative to resolving any issues about capital adequacy," <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2536256720080125">S&amp;P analyst Dick Smith</a> said in an interview with <em>Reuters</em>. </p>
<p>The fact of the matter is that no one knows how much money will be needed because no one is certain how much worse the credit crisis and mortgage debacles may get. That, in turn, is likely to make big banks gun-shy about writing checks for money that they may not have themselves. Most are in the market raising funds to save themselves.</p>
<p>The value of the two big muni bond insurers could still go to zero and the big banks my not want to see all of that capital disappear.</p>
<p>If New York State wants to act, it should bring capital of its own to the table and not ask the banks to carry the whole load.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/26/how-much-money-to-save-the-bond-insurers/">How much money to save the bond insurers?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/26/how-much-money-to-save-the-bond-insurers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1097641/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/26/how-much-money-to-save-the-bond-insurers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>Dick Smith</category><category>Eric Dinallo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA</category><category>muni bond insurers</category><category>muni bonds</category><category>New York</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Societe Generale trader scandal unlikely to deflect Fed off easing course]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/societe-generale-trader-scandal-seen-unlikely-to-deflect-fed-off/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/societe-generale-trader-scandal-seen-unlikely-to-deflect-fed-off/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/societe-generale-trader-scandal-seen-unlikely-to-deflect-fed-off/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>As criticism mounted Friday that the U.S Federal Reserve may have at least partially 'jumped the gun' with a large 75-basis-point rate increase after U.S. stock markets plunged early Tuesday, economists and analysts say the Fed is unlikely to deviate from its easing monetary policy path, even though some evidence suggests Societe Generale's unwinding of a rogue bank trader's unauthorized trades may have contributed to Tuesday's plunge. <br /><br />The Dow plunged more than 400 points in the first hours of trading Tuesday, following massive sell-offs in Asia in Europe on Monday, and the Fed, concerned about the impact of potential market crash on an already weakened U.S. economy and financial system, responded with an emergency-meeting, 75-basis-point rate cut for both the Fed Funds rate, to 3.50%, and the discount rate, to 4%.<br /><br /><strong>Societe Generale factor<br /></strong><br />However, on Thursday Societe Generale, France's second largest bank, announced that on Monday and Tuesday it had unwound trades of a rogue trader's unauthorized -- and losing -- trades, which cost the bank almost $7.2 billion, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h8jkMIDj4zmw-2u6_pyVeOLPywLQD8UCKTH80">The Associated Press reported.</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/societe-generale-trader-scandal-seen-unlikely-to-deflect-fed-off/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Societe Generale trader scandal unlikely to deflect Fed off easing course</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/societe-generale-trader-scandal-seen-unlikely-to-deflect-fed-off/">Societe Generale trader scandal unlikely to deflect Fed off easing course</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/societe-generale-trader-scandal-seen-unlikely-to-deflect-fed-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1096670/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/societe-generale-trader-scandal-seen-unlikely-to-deflect-fed-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Asia</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>Europe</category><category>France</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgage insurers</category><category>recession</category><category>Societe Generale</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><category>trading</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can shaky Citi and Merrill bail out bond insurance?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/can-shaky-citi-and-merrill-bail-out-bond-insurance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/can-shaky-citi-and-merrill-bail-out-bond-insurance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/can-shaky-citi-and-merrill-bail-out-bond-insurance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/peter-cohan-160.jpg" />Yesterday, the market rebounded from down 300 to up 300 points on the strength of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/cramers-second-victory-how-an-insurance-bailout-spiked-todays/">rumors of a bailout</a> for bond insurance companies like <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>). But today's article in the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/business/24bonds.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=all">New York Times</a></em> suggests to me that there may be less there than meets the eye. That's because the report says that insurance regulators are trying to raise $15 billion from <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Citigroup </a></strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">C</a>), <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Merrill Lynch</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MER</a>) and <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Goldman Sachs Group</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GS</a>).</p>
<p>Is anybody home? In case anyone forgot, Citigroup and Merrill bot announced huge losses and are scrambling to raise capital. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/peter-cohan/page/2/">Citi lost $1.99</a> a share and Merrill lost a cool $12.01. Fortunately, they've recently raised <a href="http://www.pionline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080121/PRINTSUB/392474424/1010">$18.7 billion</a> and <a href="http://www.pionline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080121/PRINTSUB/392474424/1010">$12.8 billion</a> respectively from <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/krugman-gets-one-right-and-why-swf-does-not-mean-single-white-fe/">Sovereign Wealth Funds</a> (SWFs). But as a Citi investor, I don't want it turning around and investing that capital in yet another subprime-related house of cards.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/can-shaky-citi-and-merrill-bail-out-bond-insurance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can shaky Citi and Merrill bail out bond insurance?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/can-shaky-citi-and-merrill-bail-out-bond-insurance/">Can shaky Citi and Merrill bail out bond insurance?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/business/24bonds.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=all>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/can-shaky-citi-and-merrill-bail-out-bond-insurance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1095457/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/can-shaky-citi-and-merrill-bail-out-bond-insurance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond insurance</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurance</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>c</category><category>citigroupc</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>gs</category><category>mbi</category><category>mbia</category><category>mer</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: NYS regulator urges banks to bail out struggling bond insurers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/newspaper-wrap-up-nys-regulator-urges-banks-to-bail-out-struggl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/newspaper-wrap-up-nys-regulator-urges-banks-to-bail-out-struggl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/newspaper-wrap-up-nys-regulator-urges-banks-to-bail-out-struggl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Two years after saying it would open about 100 new branches a year, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Incorporated</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) has decided to drastically cut back, and will instead focus on big markets, reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120114739155612723.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) wants a piece of the pharmacy benefits business, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120113328051911747.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported, and will begin an initial program to help "select employers...manage how they process and pay prescription claims," CEO Lee Scott said.</li>
    <li>New York insurance superintendent Eric Dinallo is urging bank executives to provide up to $5B in initial capital to support struggling bond insurers such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac Financial Group Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>), the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/107a1c0c-c9eb-11dc-b5dc-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported. Sources believe the insurance regulator is looking for leading U.S. banks to ultimately commit up to $15B.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to the <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h6N3TFKbJzod1IEq-ywSW2fCgHuwD8UBSIB80"><em>Associated Press</em></a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc</a> (MASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) may be eyeing an online music service, two record company executives familiar with the matter said. As part of an ad-supported service, the sources said Yahoo has held talks with several major record labels to potentially offer unprotected MP3s for free or for sale.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/newspaper-wrap-up-nys-regulator-urges-banks-to-bail-out-struggl/">Newspaper wrap-up: NYS regulator urges banks to bail out struggling bond insurers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/newspaper-wrap-up-nys-regulator-urges-banks-to-bail-out-struggl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1095378/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/newspaper-wrap-up-nys-regulator-urges-banks-to-bail-out-struggl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>financing</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA</category><category>Wal-mart</category><category>WMT</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer's Second Victory: How an insurance bailout spiked today's Dow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/cramers-second-victory-how-an-insurance-bailout-spiked-todays/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/cramers-second-victory-how-an-insurance-bailout-spiked-todays/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/cramers-second-victory-how-an-insurance-bailout-spiked-todays/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/peter-cohan-(wince).jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />I was surprised and pleased to see the Dow rebound this afternoon. The reason the market rebounded is simple: the New York Insurance regulatory agency met with bond insurers to discuss ways to bail them out of the little mess they're in. Count this as another victory for Jim Cramer.</p>
<p>Just yesterday, Cramer was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-and-a-vulture-might-save-them/">making his pitch</a> for catastrophe unless somebody saved the bond insurers who were losing their AAA rating and thus being driven out of business. Without bond insurers, all those $3.7 trillion worth of corporate bonds -- and plenty of other municipal and state bonds too -- had nobody to back them up in case the bond issuers defaulted. In Cramer's view, this was spooking the market.</p>
<p>But this afternoon, just as it did last August when Cramer issued the whine heard round the financial world, the government gave Cramer what he wanted. But we didn't get a complete repeat of last August -- when the Fed cut interest rates for Cramer. Today, <em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=auRcG9dcGUSU&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a></em> reported that the New York Insurance Department is meeting with bond insurers. This includes one of the biggest, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>), which insures $2.4 trillion worth of bonds. It is likely they'll be bailed out. And the market ended up rising about 300 points. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the market benefit of those government bailouts only last a day or two. What will Cramer whine for next?</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#888888">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in MBIA securities.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/cramers-second-victory-how-an-insurance-bailout-spiked-todays/">Cramer's Second Victory: How an insurance bailout spiked today's Dow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/cramers-second-victory-how-an-insurance-bailout-spiked-todays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1094856/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/cramers-second-victory-how-an-insurance-bailout-spiked-todays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond bailouts</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondBailouts</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>market spike</category><category>MarketSpike</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best Stocks for 2008: Forbes expert banks on MBIA (MBI) and AMBAC (ABK)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/best-stocks-for-2008-forbes-expert-banks-on-mbia-mbi-and-amba/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/best-stocks-for-2008-forbes-expert-banks-on-mbia-mbi-and-amba/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/best-stocks-for-2008-forbes-expert-banks-on-mbia-mbi-and-amba/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2008/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2008</a></p><p><em>For 25 years, Steven Halpern, editor of </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=1583"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em>, has surveyed the leading financial newsletter advisors asking for their favorite stocks for the coming year. This article is one of 100+ ideas in the </em><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/top-stocks-2008/top-100-stocks"><em>Best Stocks for 2008</em></a><em> report.</em></p>
<p>"My favorite picks for 2008 are two monoline bond insurers: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AMBAC</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ABK</a>)," says <strong>Richard Lehmann</strong>, editor of <a href="http://www.newsletters.forbes.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&amp;Locale=en_US&amp;id=ProductDetailsPage&amp;SiteID=es_764&amp;productID=10294500&amp;pgm=4197200">The Forbes Lehmann Income Securities Investor</a>.</p>
<p>"These two companies have been heavily shorted by speculators because of their exposure to subprime mortgage defaults. At current pricing, they are selling at half book value and only three times earnings. </p>
<p>"The reason for current concern is that they will lose their AAA credit enhancement ratings and therefore their ability to conduct new business, something I don't think is likely because there are various remedies to forestall such an event.<br /><br />"For 2008, the demand for their services should grow substantially since the reliance by lenders on credit ratings alone has been seriously eroded. Also, their insurance of CMOs and CDOs only protect the most senior tier of a multi-tiered debt instrument, so their loss exposure is very marginal and years off. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/best-stocks-for-2008-forbes-expert-banks-on-mbia-mbi-and-amba/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best Stocks for 2008: Forbes expert banks on MBIA (MBI) and AMBAC (ABK)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/best-stocks-for-2008-forbes-expert-banks-on-mbia-mbi-and-amba/">Best Stocks for 2008: Forbes expert banks on MBIA (MBI) and AMBAC (ABK)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/best-stocks-for-2008-forbes-expert-banks-on-mbia-mbi-and-amba/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1061336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/best-stocks-for-2008-forbes-expert-banks-on-mbia-mbi-and-amba/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abk</category><category>ambac</category><category>best stocks 2008</category><category>bond insurance stocks</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>forbes lehmann income securities investor</category><category>income investing</category><category>income stocks</category><category>mbi</category><category>mbia</category><category>richard lehmann</category><category>top stocks 2008</category><category>yield stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cities finding it hard to get money thanks to credit crisis]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/cities-findng-it-hard-to-get-money-thanks-to-credit-crisis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/cities-findng-it-hard-to-get-money-thanks-to-credit-crisis/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/cities-findng-it-hard-to-get-money-thanks-to-credit-crisis/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p>Investors normally jump at the chance of tax free municipal bonds, and cities normally don't have any trouble funding projects they want to do using those types of bonds. Well, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/28/AR2007112802486_pf.html">the bond funds have dried up for many municipalities</a> that have lower credit ratings, according to the <em>Washington Post</em> this morning. Chicago was forced to cancel a $960 million bond deal, Miami-Dade had to pull a $540 million bond deal for its airport and Washington, D.C. stopped the sale of $350 million in bonds for schools, parks and roads. The municipal bond market is a $2.5 trillion market that raises funds for buildings, ballparks and other key projects for cities and school systems.</p>
<p>Why is this happening? Because the bond insurers, which normally would back these bonds, are overextended due to the mortgage mess. They need to cover steep losses because of the massive mortgage write-downs and they don't have the capital to insure new projects.</p>
<p>Municipalities have to choose between paying higher rates because they can't get the secondary bond insurance or put off intended projects. If they pay higher interest rates, the taxpayers will have to foot the bill. So many cities with lower credit ratings have decided to pull back the bond offers and delay needed projects. They face a double whammy because tax revenues for many of these cities will also drop as their core source of funding -- property taxes -- fall as the <a href="http://vlo.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/biggest-existing-homes-sales-price-drop-on-record-last-month/">value of homes is falling</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/cities-findng-it-hard-to-get-money-thanks-to-credit-crisis/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cities finding it hard to get money thanks to credit crisis</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/cities-findng-it-hard-to-get-money-thanks-to-credit-crisis/">Cities finding it hard to get money thanks to credit crisis</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/28/AR2007112802486_pf.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/cities-findng-it-hard-to-get-money-thanks-to-credit-crisis/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1050689/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/cities-findng-it-hard-to-get-money-thanks-to-credit-crisis/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>inthenews</category><category>municipal bonds</category><category>MunicipalBonds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:22:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
