<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street Set to Receive Bigger Bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/wall-street-set-to-receive-bigger-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/wall-street-set-to-receive-bigger-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/wall-street-set-to-receive-bigger-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/us-dollarnote-240.jpg" />A survey conducted by Johnson Associates, a compensation consultant firm, indicates that compensation for employees of hedge funds, retail banking and private equity firms will be higher by 5%, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704506404575592644050046172.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> reports.</p>
<p>Here are some findings of the Johnson sturdy:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Bond traders will see bonuses for 2010 decline 25% to 30%.</li>
    <li>Stock traders will see bonuses fall by 20% to 25%.</li>
    <li>Employees of asset management firms, including hedge funds, can see a 5% gain, reflecting the increase in assets under management.</li>
    <li>Retail banks are set to increase bonuses 5% to 10%.</li>
    <li>Despite this year's increases, bonuses will be 20% to 30% lower than the all time high in 2007.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/wall-street-set-to-receive-bigger-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street Set to Receive Bigger Bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/wall-street-set-to-receive-bigger-bonuses/">Wall Street Set to Receive Bigger Bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704506404575592644050046172.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/wall-street-set-to-receive-bigger-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19702316/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/wall-street-set-to-receive-bigger-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>inthenews</category><category>trader</category><category>wall street</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MEMC CEO Forgoes Bonus; Money Will Go to Retrain Workers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/memc-ceo-forgoes-bonus-money-will-go-to-retrain-workers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/memc-ceo-forgoes-bonus-money-will-go-to-retrain-workers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/memc-ceo-forgoes-bonus-money-will-go-to-retrain-workers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/memc-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Last Thursday, MEMC Electronic Materials (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/memc-electronic-materials-inc/wfr/nys" target="_blank">WFR</a>) announced that CEO Ahmad Chatila won't be accepting a $500,000 bonus for 2009. Instead, the money will go to <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/mound-city-money/st-louis-companies/2010/02/ceo-forgoes-500000-bonus-money-goes-to-help-laid-off-workers/print/" target="_blank">retraining 450 workers that will be laid off from two plant closings</a>. This story somehow has flown under the radar and did not get the attention it deserves.<br />
<br />
Like many companies last year, MEMC did not meet its performance targets for 2009. And still no different than many other companies, it, too, decided to award more than $600,000 in bonuses, using "discretionary authority." These bonuses were awarded "in consideration of achievement of individual performance objectives."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/memc-ceo-forgoes-bonus-money-will-go-to-retrain-workers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MEMC CEO Forgoes Bonus; Money Will Go to Retrain Workers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/memc-ceo-forgoes-bonus-money-will-go-to-retrain-workers/">MEMC CEO Forgoes Bonus; Money Will Go to Retrain Workers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/memc-ceo-forgoes-bonus-money-will-go-to-retrain-workers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19350375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/memc-ceo-forgoes-bonus-money-will-go-to-retrain-workers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>ceo</category><category>featured</category><category>Memc Electronic Materials</category><category>MemcElectronicMaterials</category><category>unemployment</category><category>wfr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs to pay $20 billion bonuses in stock, not cash]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/goldman-sachs-to-pay-20-billion-in-stock-mostly-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/goldman-sachs-to-pay-20-billion-in-stock-mostly-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/goldman-sachs-to-pay-20-billion-in-stock-mostly-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" />Maybe Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys" target="_blank">GS</a>) does care what outsiders think about it. The company has come under plenty of fire this year for its post-financial crisis <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bonus/">bonus</a> payments, especially after having accepted TARP money from the government. In order to keep the world off its back, the bank is going to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-12-10-goldman-execs_N.htm">pay managers their annual bonuses in stock</a> this year instead of cash. <br /><br />And the stock issued will have to be held for five years. So, recipients will have a long-term stake in the company. But it seems they're being compensated for that, too as GS is spending a total of over $20 billion in compensation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/goldman-sachs-to-pay-20-billion-in-stock-mostly-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs to pay $20 billion bonuses in stock, not cash</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/goldman-sachs-to-pay-20-billion-in-stock-mostly-bonuses/">Goldman Sachs to pay $20 billion bonuses in stock, not cash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-12-10-goldman-execs_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/goldman-sachs-to-pay-20-billion-in-stock-mostly-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19274826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/goldman-sachs-to-pay-20-billion-in-stock-mostly-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>Brookings Institution</category><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jp morgan chase</category><category>JPM</category><category>Restricted Stock</category><category>tarp</category><category>TARP repayment</category><category>Troubled Asset Relief Program</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[France follows the U.K. to impose tax on bank bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/france-follows-the-u-k-to-impose-tax-on-bank-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/france-follows-the-u-k-to-impose-tax-on-bank-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/france-follows-the-u-k-to-impose-tax-on-bank-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/investing.jpg" />French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, said he would follow the U.K. and <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/05b1bb70-e570-11de-81b4-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1">impose a one-off tax on bonus payouts</a> by banks operating in France.</p>
<p>The tax would be levied on bonus payouts above 27,000 euros. Paris's move is in line with Britain's tax on payouts above 25,000 pounds.</p>
<p>Both leaders issued a statement saying: "It is clear that the action must be taken at a global level. No territory can be expected to or be able to act on their own."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/france-follows-the-u-k-to-impose-tax-on-bank-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>France follows the U.K. to impose tax on bank bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/france-follows-the-u-k-to-impose-tax-on-bank-bonuses/">France follows the U.K. to impose tax on bank bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/05b1bb70-e570-11de-81b4-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/france-follows-the-u-k-to-impose-tax-on-bank-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19273182/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/france-follows-the-u-k-to-impose-tax-on-bank-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>brown</category><category>france</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Sarkozy</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner attacks bank bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/geither.jpg" />U.S. Treasury Secretary, Geithner, was <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/dec2009/db2009124_675445.htm">severely critical of excessive bank bonuses</a>. In a recent interview he said, "We want to see fundamental constraints on how senior executives are paid at these institutions."</p>
<p>Geithner has been under fire for his actions during the bank bailouts of last year. He defended himself by saying: "The entire U.S. financial system and all the major firms in the country, and even small banks across the country, were at that moment at the middle of a classic run, a classic bank run."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner attacks bank bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/">U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner attacks bank bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/dec2009/db2009124_675445.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19266690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>executive pay</category><category>geithner</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs shareholders want less bonuses, more of the profit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" />According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, some of Goldman Sachs's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) largest shareholders are petitioning the company to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704533904574545981008841004.html?mod=rss_Deals_and_Deal_Makers">lower the size of its bonus pool</a>. These shareholders feel that GS should be passing along more of its earnings to investors. According to "people familiar with the situation," these investors hold "tens of millions" of GS shares and are complaining in private conversations at GS's annual analyst meetings.<br /><br />With GS raking in record net income and compensation, the shareholders believe that the benefits should be shared among them rather than in compensation and benefit for the employees. The shareholders are also concerned about a minute change in the firm's financial statements regarding how the company counts the number of employees.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs shareholders want less bonuses, more of the profit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/">Goldman Sachs shareholders want less bonuses, more of the profit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/goldman-sachs-shareholders-want-less-bonuses-more-of-the-profit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>pay</category><category>payout</category><category>shareholders</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UK regulators will have the power to 'tear up' bank bonus contracts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/investing.jpg" />We've got to congratulate Britain's prime minister, Gordon Brown, for his tough <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aBUoJS0091Ew&amp;pos=2">stand on bank bonuses</a>. He plans to make some bank bonuses illegal, according to a Bloomberg article.<br /></p>
<p>Regulators will be given "powers if necessary to tear up contracts that would result in payments being made that would cause instability," according to the Sunday Telegraph. Not only that, but the paper reports that City Minister Paul Myners told Sky News that "if those contracts are written, they will be voided under law."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UK regulators will have the power to 'tear up' bank bonus contracts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/">UK regulators will have the power to 'tear up' bank bonus contracts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aBUoJS0091Ew&amp;pos=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19240279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/uk-regulators-will-have-the-power-to-tear-up-bank-bonus-contra/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>bonus</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Judge will not approve Bank of America, SEC settlement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/judge-will-not-approve-bank-of-america-sec-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/judge-will-not-approve-bank-of-america-sec-settlement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/judge-will-not-approve-bank-of-america-sec-settlement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bac-bank-of-america-logo.jpg" />We have another fly in the ointment. Judge Jed Ratkoff of federal district court <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5750N920090806">refused to approve</a> a $33 million settlement in the SEC vs. Bank of America Corp case.</p>
<p>In the complaint, the SEC had alleged that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) told investors in the proxy documents for the Merrill Lynch merger that Merrill agreed NOT to award year-end performance bonuses before the merger closed.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/judge-will-not-approve-bank-of-america-sec-settlement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Judge will not approve Bank of America, SEC settlement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/judge-will-not-approve-bank-of-america-sec-settlement/">Judge will not approve Bank of America, SEC settlement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5750N920090806>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/judge-will-not-approve-bank-of-america-sec-settlement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19121065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/judge-will-not-approve-bank-of-america-sec-settlement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>bonus</category><category>inthenews</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America accused of shelling out big bonuses to bankers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="179" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bankofamerica.jpg" alt="" />A report today in <em>The New York Post </em>reveals that bailed-out <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) is still doling out <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06182009/business/bailout_bonus_at_bofa_174854.htm">millions in bonuses</a> to attract and retain top banking talent. Bank of America is catching heat over the bonus payouts, since it hasn't yet received federal clearance to repay its $45 billion in TARP loans.</p>
<p>Bank of America allegedly shelled out $15 million over two years to keep Fares Noujaim, an alumnus of both Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch, who now serves as the company's vice chairman of investment banking. Harry McMahon is named as another banker who's been enticed to stay with handsome bonuses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America accused of shelling out big bonuses to bankers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/">Bank of America accused of shelling out big bonuses to bankers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19071000/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/bank-of-america-accused-of-shelling-out-big-bonuses-to-bankers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>bonus</category><category>Fares Noujaim</category><category>featured</category><category>Harry McMahon</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kenneth Lewis</category><category>options</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank lobbyists launch lame defense of taxpayer-funded bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/bank-lobbyists-launch-lame-defense-of-taxpayer-funded-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/bank-lobbyists-launch-lame-defense-of-taxpayer-funded-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/bank-lobbyists-launch-lame-defense-of-taxpayer-funded-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Bank lobbyists have a job I would not want. Their clients need them to fight a tide of populist revulsion against the use of taxpayer money to pay out billions in bonuses to bankers who pushed the global financial system into bankruptcy. More specifically, those bank lobbyists are buttonholing senators, trying to convince them to vote against a House bill that passed by a vote of <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a5JHdEyAaec4&amp;refer=home">328 to 93</a>, which would tax bonuses paid to bailout recipients at 90%. These lobbyists are making arguments that lack substance. <br /></p>
<p>First, they suggest that restricting bonuses will put the companies at a competitive disadvantage. That argument is content-free because the bonus tax would apply to <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29786420/page/2/">500 firms that have received $200 billion</a> from the government. This means that all those financial institutions will face the same bonus restrictions and thus all be on the same playing field. Moreover, these so-called talented individuals the lobbyists are seeking to reward with bonuses are the very same ones who made the money-losing deals in the first place. I am not sure how much more of that kind of "talent" we can afford.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/bank-lobbyists-launch-lame-defense-of-taxpayer-funded-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank lobbyists launch lame defense of taxpayer-funded bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/bank-lobbyists-launch-lame-defense-of-taxpayer-funded-bonuses/">Bank lobbyists launch lame defense of taxpayer-funded bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/bank-lobbyists-launch-lame-defense-of-taxpayer-funded-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1493563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/bank-lobbyists-launch-lame-defense-of-taxpayer-funded-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>bonus</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bankers defend bailout: 'We used different money for bonuses']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/bankers-defend-bailout-we-used-different-money-for-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/bankers-defend-bailout-we-used-different-money-for-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/bankers-defend-bailout-we-used-different-money-for-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>The CEOs of the big TARP-backed banks appeared before the House Financial Services Committee yesterday to talk about the bailout and basically endure a few hours of awkwardness.<br /><br />The Associated Press <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-02-10-bankers-praise-bailout_N.htm">reports that </a>"Anticipating confrontations over their own compensation, several asserted that none of the government's money went to bonuses or dividends" in their prepared remarks.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/bankers-defend-bailout-we-used-different-money-for-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bankers defend bailout: 'We used different money for bonuses'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/bankers-defend-bailout-we-used-different-money-for-bonuses/">Bankers defend bailout: 'We used different money for bonuses'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-02-10-bankers-praise-bailout_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/bankers-defend-bailout-we-used-different-money-for-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1456886/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/bankers-defend-bailout-we-used-different-money-for-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailout</category><category>bonus</category><category>tarp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Firing bank executives instead of cutting bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/firing-banks-executives-instead-of-cutting-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/firing-banks-executives-instead-of-cutting-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/firing-banks-executives-instead-of-cutting-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bac-bank-of-america-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Ken Lewis followed the lead of many other bank CEOs. The head of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE5056Q720090106">will take no bonus</a> for last year. BAC will also miss its financial forecasts for 2008.</p>
<p>There is still a very substantial question about how bank boards handled the credit crisis and the M&amp;A deals some large firms did in the wake of the trouble. Bank of America bought Countrywide just as other large banks picked up rivals at bargain prices.</p>
<p>But, were they bargains? There is a good deal of analysis emerging that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) may struggle to integrate Bear Stearns and other acquisitions. The balance sheets of the bank's targets may be worse than first realized.</p>
<p>Even if Countrywide was a relatively good deal, integrating it takes management time away from running the BAC core businesses which are likely to suffer heavy losses due to credit write-offs from consumer and business loans.</p>
<p>Lewis was the architect of the BAC M&amp;A deals. He seems to be paying a relatively low price for the extent to which they have damaged the bank. The firm's board does not appear to care much about that. </p>
<p>The buck of bad decisions is being passed around at BAC and shareholders will probably end up with it.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/firing-banks-executives-instead-of-cutting-bonuses/">Firing bank executives instead of cutting bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/firing-banks-executives-instead-of-cutting-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421304/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/firing-banks-executives-instead-of-cutting-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>bonus</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush rewards the guilty with our tax dollars]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/bush-rewards-the-guilty-with-our-tax-dollars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/bush-rewards-the-guilty-with-our-tax-dollars/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/bush-rewards-the-guilty-with-our-tax-dollars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/bushpic.jpg" /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duLds-TZMGw">Flying shoe-dodger</a>, President George W. Bush, has a track record of rewarding the guilty. After the faked intelligence that gave him the ammunition he needed to invade Iraq in 2004, Bush awarded a <a href="http://www.medaloffreedom.com/GeorgeTenet.htm">Presidential Medal of Freedom</a> to CIA Director George "Slam Dunk" Tenet. And to reward the banks that got us into the current financial catastrophe, Bush rammed through Congress a bill that uses $700 billion of our tax dollars to pay bonuses to the executives who run those banks.</p>
<p>How did he do that? As usual, he did it secretively. The law that created the bailout bill includes provisions that limit executive compensation for banks that get bailout money. Specifically, the bill requires that banks report to the IRS any compensation above <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28232631/">$500,000</a> paid to their top five executives. If that reporting does not occur, the IRS can impose tax penalties. Not only that, but there is no limit to what people below the top five can get paid -- so there never was any way to keep taxpayer money from paying millions to the traders and investment bankers who often get more than the CEO.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/bush-rewards-the-guilty-with-our-tax-dollars/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush rewards the guilty with our tax dollars</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/bush-rewards-the-guilty-with-our-tax-dollars/">Bush rewards the guilty with our tax dollars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28232631/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/bush-rewards-the-guilty-with-our-tax-dollars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1401392/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/bush-rewards-the-guilty-with-our-tax-dollars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>bonus</category><category>george bush</category><category>george w. bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>GeorgeW.Bush</category><category>hank paulson</category><category>HankPaulson</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tarp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citi to cut 53,000 workers, may cancel executive bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/citi-to-cut-53-000-workers-may-cancel-executive-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/citi-to-cut-53-000-workers-may-cancel-executive-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/citi-to-cut-53-000-workers-may-cancel-executive-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p>Vikram Pandit, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>)'s CEO, is set to announce an <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27719673/">even bigger round of job cuts</a> this morning. (This round may supercede the potential <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/14/news/companies/citigroup_layoffs/index.htm">10,000</a> layoffs announced last Friday.) Will these cuts help revive Citi? No. But they may lower its cash burn rate by <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amJDipAa2oNw&amp;refer=home">$50 billion</a> in 2009. And investors are not impressed, sending its stock down 2.2% in pre-market.</p>
<p>Citi's 53,000 job cuts would represent a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amJDipAa2oNw&amp;refer=home">14% cut</a> -- yielding a total workforce of 300,000. Citi may also decide on canceling management bonuses -- a move led by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>). Let's hope that these bonus cuts affect the entire industry -- not just top management. After all, the Treasury has already given <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/will-our-tax-dollars-pay-26-6-billion-in-wall-street-bonuses-th/">$159 billion to 24 leading banks</a> and it would be a shame to see that money going to pay bonuses to people who got us into this mess.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Citi is posed to raise rates on its credit card customers. Citi, which had 182.7 million open card accounts card customers in the third quarter, has told as many as 20% of them that their rates are being raised by an average of three percentage points. Credit losses in Citi's global card division rose over a third to $1.59 billion in the third quarter of 2008.</p>
<p>Now, thousands of Citi workers will pay with their jobs.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"></a><em>. He owns Citigroup stock.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/citi-to-cut-53-000-workers-may-cancel-executive-bonuses/">Citi to cut 53,000 workers, may cancel executive bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27719673/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/citi-to-cut-53-000-workers-may-cancel-executive-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1374210/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/citi-to-cut-53-000-workers-may-cancel-executive-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>pandit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York's Cuomo goes after Wall Street bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/new-yorks-cuomo-goes-after-wall-street-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/new-yorks-cuomo-goes-after-wall-street-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/new-yorks-cuomo-goes-after-wall-street-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p>NY State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo wants to see detailed account of the bonuses banks and investment houses are planning to pay for 2008, and he wants the figures before the checks are passed out. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122530677606581085.html">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "He is looking for information from banks that have received or are expected to receive funds under the Treasury Department's Troubled Asset Relief Program."</p>
<p>It is not clear why Cuomo has anything to say about a federal matter, but that has not stopped him from investigating Wall Street matters before. Among the firms being asked to supply data are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>). </p>
<p>Cuomo's case may turn on whether banks committed fraud by planning to make large bonus payments, but it is not quite clear why rewarding people for their work could be considered criminal. There may be an ethical problem with paying huge sums for work that, in some cases, lost Wall Street firms money. There may also be a shareholder issue about whether people holding stock in these companies think boards should pass out such a large portion of revenue to senior employees.</p>
<p>It has taken forever to curb huge payouts on Wall Street. There are now enough people looking into it that perhaps compensation will become more sane. Once the credit crisis is over, things can go back to the way they were.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/new-yorks-cuomo-goes-after-wall-street-bonuses/">New York's Cuomo goes after Wall Street bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122530677606581085.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/new-yorks-cuomo-goes-after-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1357208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/new-yorks-cuomo-goes-after-wall-street-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>cuomo</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What happened to the $122.8 billion we gave AIG?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/what-happened-to-the-122-8-billion-we-gave-aig/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/what-happened-to-the-122-8-billion-we-gave-aig/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/what-happened-to-the-122-8-billion-we-gave-aig/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hal/" rel="tag">Halliburton (HAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/aig-american-international-group-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />We know that some of that money went to pay for plush <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/aig-takes-122-8-billion-of-taxpayer-money-enjoys-luxury-resorts/">resort vacations in California</a>. But that is only the small amounts. The Administration just figured -- "Heh, it's not our money going out the door -- who cares what happens to it?" </p>
<p>It was the same thing with <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-08-15-iraqcontracts_N.htm">$44.5 billion</a> worth of government contracts for Iraq -- give friends the billions and let them do with it what they want. This attitude led to the firing of an Army official who refused to authorize <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/washington/17contractor.html">$1 billion</a> in questionable charges to KBR, the unit of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/halliburton-company/hal/nys">Halliburton</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/halliburton-company/hal/nys">HAL</a>) that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/makeover-needed-halliburton/">Dick Cheney formerly ran</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a><strong> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) is not required to report how it's spending our money, but <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/30/business/30aig.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">hints have surfaced</a> about where some of it went: $18 billion to cover losses on AIG's securities lending -- where it lent out securities which then declined in value, and $13 billion to pay guarantees on Guaranteed Investment Contracts (GICs). I know I had nothing to do with these bad business bets so why am I paying for them?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/what-happened-to-the-122-8-billion-we-gave-aig/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What happened to the $122.8 billion we gave AIG?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/what-happened-to-the-122-8-billion-we-gave-aig/">What happened to the $122.8 billion we gave AIG?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/30/business/30aig.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/what-happened-to-the-122-8-billion-we-gave-aig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1357277/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/what-happened-to-the-122-8-billion-we-gave-aig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>bailout</category><category>bonus</category><category>cuomo</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Streeters expect bigger bonuses this year --  they gotta be kidding]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/wall-streeters-expect-bigger-bonuses-this-year-they-gotta-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/wall-streeters-expect-bigger-bonuses-this-year-they-gotta-be/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/wall-streeters-expect-bigger-bonuses-this-year-they-gotta-be/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p>Seems the government, and the people, just can't seem to learn their lesson. <br /><br />Wasn't it just last week that former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jSSJzC1UNusL4eW21xsZ7HJcM8WQD9409R0O4">testified in front of a House committee</a>, saying his model was flawed because he overestimated how entities -- run by people -- would react to a free system. He thought banks would act in their own best interest, which is to protect themselves and their stockholders. But seems the people who run these banks were more interested in protecting their own personal wealth and increasing it further, actually losing site of the bigger, longer-term picture.<br /><br />So you'd think government would learn, right? Wrong.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=an7WRFhqReH4">Congressional investigators now want answers</a> from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) and seven other banks that took the $125 billion as part of a taxpayer-funded bailout, fully planning on paying billions of dollars in pay and bonuses. What did we think? That they'd actually use the American people's money to help the economy? Forget the economy, to help their own firms? Of course not. They wanted the money to further cushion their own pockets.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/wall-streeters-expect-bigger-bonuses-this-year-they-gotta-be/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Streeters expect bigger bonuses this year --  they gotta be kidding</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/wall-streeters-expect-bigger-bonuses-this-year-they-gotta-be/">Wall Streeters expect bigger bonuses this year --  they gotta be kidding</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=an7WRFhqReH4>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/wall-streeters-expect-bigger-bonuses-this-year-they-gotta-be/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1355672/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/wall-streeters-expect-bigger-bonuses-this-year-they-gotta-be/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>bonus</category><category>c</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The mad, mad world of Wall Street bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/retirement-savings-150a080206.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />This year Wall Street bonuses are looking to hit a new record. Last year, they hit a record of <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/11/markets/job_bonuses/index.htm">$21.5 billion</a> and I've seen estimates that they'll be up between <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/07/business/07wall.html?ex=1320555600&amp;en=99353bba1c4e0eb8&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">10% and 25%</a> in 2006. </p>
<p>One expert, Options Group, estimates that the big winners will be investment bankers and equity underwriters and traders. Driven by a record year in mergers, investment bankers will receive bonuses 20% to 25% higher than in 2005, as will those in equity derivatives sales. The "losers" will be fixed-income proprietary traders, who will earn the same or less than they did in 2005. </p>
<p>This year, the best place for bonus babies is the Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS), which is distributing <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/13/is-goldman-sachs-a-good-long-term-holding/">$16.5 billion</a> worth of bonuses among its 36,000 employees -- up 40% from 2005. While this averages out to $623,418 per full-time employee, a few traders will take home $100 million. </p>
<p>How can any company justify paying so much money to one person? That $100 million bonus is <strong>2,159</strong> times the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/fsbr/income.html">$46,326</a> that the median U.S. family earns every year! Do traders really work <strong>2,159 </strong>times harder than the average family? Are their lives really <strong>2,159</strong> more stressful? How can any CEO justify paying out so much money?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The mad, mad world of Wall Street bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/">The mad, mad world of Wall Street bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/718853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>Blankfein</category><category>bonus</category><category>equity underwriters</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>Hank Paulsen</category><category>investment bankers</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>Options Group</category><category>Robin Hood</category><category>wall street bonuses</category><category>WallStreetBonuses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Holiday bonuses vary from generous to ... ice cream]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/holiday-bonuses-vary-from-generous-to-ice-cream/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/holiday-bonuses-vary-from-generous-to-ice-cream/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/holiday-bonuses-vary-from-generous-to-ice-cream/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/time_warner_center_talking.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="what might my bonus be?" />The other night I was chatting up one of my friends, and mentioned that I'd be waiting for my bonus to decide how much I'd spend on a replacement camera. "The problem is," I said, "I have no idea about scale." I was thinking that, really, a bonus could be anything from 5% to 100% of your salary -- or more! The possibilties are endless.<br /><br />She laughed, and started telling me stories. She comes from the nonprofit world, where ... well, let's just say that they aren't as generous as the i-bankers. One year she was making $36,000, and somehow she knew her Christmas bonus would be a percentage of her salary. She was realistic, hoping for maybe 5%! That would be nice. She kept waiting for the check to arrive, and one day casually mentioned it to her husband.<br /><br />"Oh, I was wondering what that deposit for $36 was!" he said, laughing. 0.1%, to be exact.<br /><br />But that wasn't the worst of it. A friend of hers was working for the Red Cross, and had set herself a monstrous goal for new donors. No one had ever achieved such a goal, but she thought she could do it, and she did! She and a co-worker were called before the board.<br /><br />"We're really, really amazed at your achievement," they said. There were envelopes in their hands. She started thinking about what might be in them. Maybe $100! Or, even $200. So cool.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/holiday-bonuses-vary-from-generous-to-ice-cream/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Holiday bonuses vary from generous to ... ice cream</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/holiday-bonuses-vary-from-generous-to-ice-cream/">Holiday bonuses vary from generous to ... ice cream</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/holiday-bonuses-vary-from-generous-to-ice-cream/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/710476/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/holiday-bonuses-vary-from-generous-to-ice-cream/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>bonuses</category><category>christmas bonus</category><category>ChristmasBonus</category><category>holiday bonus</category><category>HolidayBonus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:49:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
