<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[When Are We Going to Pay Off the National Debt?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/06/when-are-we-going-to-pay-off-the-national-debt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/06/when-are-we-going-to-pay-off-the-national-debt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/06/when-are-we-going-to-pay-off-the-national-debt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/04/nationaldebt.jpg" />With all the talk of the nation's deficit, the federal budget, and <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20110406/NEWS15/104060411/U-S-government-shutdown-fears-set-amid-failure-reach-budget-deal">a potential government shutdown</a>, I would like to throw a question into the debate: When are we going to pay off the national debt?<br />
<br />
We have been borrowing more and more money, and the amount that we have borrowed has grown significantly compared to the total goods and services we make in this country. <br />
<br />
I recall a few years ago talking to people who were buying and selling homes. I asked them how they could afford such big, expensive houses. I thought maybe they had rich uncles. But they were just taking out interest-only mortgages and the banks were lending them 95% of the value of the houses or more. <br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/06/when-are-we-going-to-pay-off-the-national-debt/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>When Are We Going to Pay Off the National Debt?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/06/when-are-we-going-to-pay-off-the-national-debt/">When Are We Going to Pay Off the National Debt?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/06/when-are-we-going-to-pay-off-the-national-debt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19904336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/06/when-are-we-going-to-pay-off-the-national-debt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Budget</category><category>Congress</category><category>debt clock</category><category>featured</category><category>federal budget</category><category>federal shutdown</category><category>FederalShutdown</category><category>National Debt</category><category>obama</category><category>U.S. debt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Washington Gridlock: Upside and Downside]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/capitol-senate-240.jpg" />One upside to gridlock in Washington? The U.S. Congress won't likely move forward with its effort to allow the General Accounting Office to audit the <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/">U.S. Federal Reserve</a>.<br />
<br />
One (big) downside? President Obama and Congressional Republicans, particularly Republicans in the Senate may not be able to agree on next year's budget. This could result in a shutdown of the federal government if the two political parties don't agree to pass a continuing resolution in the meantime. Any inability of the parties to agree on new budget or a continuing resolution as a temporary bridge will likely rattle both the bond and stock markets.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Washington Gridlock: Upside and Downside</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/">Washington Gridlock: Upside and Downside</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19370392/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>democrats</category><category>obama</category><category>politics</category><category>republicans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Market Rally Despite Negative January Barometer (JPM, USU, LEAP, XOM)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/closing-bell-market-rally-despite-negative-january-barometer-j/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/closing-bell-market-rally-despite-negative-january-barometer-j/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/closing-bell-market-rally-despite-negative-january-barometer-j/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" />Despite the negative threat of the January Barometer, the markets rallied and rallied sharply today. A strong ISM release rose above more debt concerns globally. Even a $1.6 trillion deficit being locked in for 2011 had no negative impacts on stocks. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 	10,185.53 	+118.20 	(1.17%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 	1,089.18 	+15.31 	(1.43%) <br />
Nasdaq 	2,171.20 	+23.85 	(1.11%) <br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/02/01/top-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-bidu-cpn-id-m-mir-omcl-pld-rfmd-rri-slxp-twx-vrtx/">Top Analyst Upgrades/Downgrades</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/02/01/todays-best-market-rumors-212010-ttwocaapl/">Top Stock and Market Rumors</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/closing-bell-market-rally-despite-negative-january-barometer-j/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Market Rally Despite Negative January Barometer (JPM, USU, LEAP, XOM)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/closing-bell-market-rally-despite-negative-january-barometer-j/">Closing Bell: Market Rally Despite Negative January Barometer (JPM, USU, LEAP, XOM)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/closing-bell-market-rally-despite-negative-january-barometer-j/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19340589/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/closing-bell-market-rally-despite-negative-january-barometer-j/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>January barometer</category><category>JanuaryBarometer</category><category>nuclear energy</category><category>NuclearEnergy</category><category>oil</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Do You Have Enough Fiscal Discipline for a Spending Freeze?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/do-you-have-enough-fiscal-discipline-for-a-spending-freeze/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/do-you-have-enough-fiscal-discipline-for-a-spending-freeze/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/do-you-have-enough-fiscal-discipline-for-a-spending-freeze/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/shops.jpg" alt="" />Many of us seem to be able to spend money very quickly. We like to get out the credit cards and head to the mall. Financially, this is about as healthy for us as eating an entire gallon of Ben &amp; Jerry's ice cream.</p>
<p>Contrary to what most people think it is not necessary to eat every day and good portion of the world fasts on a regular basis. In fasting people abstain from eating solid food and drink only water or juice for a period of time. Some religious and health advocates recommend regular fasting for daylight hours, one day, three days or even up to weeks at a time. Contrary to what you might think you will survive and you will not be as hungry as you think...</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/do-you-have-enough-fiscal-discipline-for-a-spending-freeze/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Do You Have Enough Fiscal Discipline for a Spending Freeze?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/do-you-have-enough-fiscal-discipline-for-a-spending-freeze/">Do You Have Enough Fiscal Discipline for a Spending Freeze?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/do-you-have-enough-fiscal-discipline-for-a-spending-freeze/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19327420/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/do-you-have-enough-fiscal-discipline-for-a-spending-freeze/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>personal finance</category><category>spending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Do You Know Where Your Money Goes?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/do-you-know-where-your-money-goes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/do-you-know-where-your-money-goes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/do-you-know-where-your-money-goes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/investing.jpg" />Around the new year, many people set goals to stick to a budget or to manage their money better. It can be hard and sometimes it is only a matter of weeks before they fall back into the bad habits.<br />
<br />
No matter how much money you make, at times it seems like it is never enough. People who make $20,000, $50,000 or $100,000 can all be caught in the financial pickle and much of it has to do with how those incomes are managed. Here is a challenge for you to help you watch your spending.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/do-you-know-where-your-money-goes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Do You Know Where Your Money Goes?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/do-you-know-where-your-money-goes/">Do You Know Where Your Money Goes?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/do-you-know-where-your-money-goes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19325450/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/do-you-know-where-your-money-goes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>personal finance</category><category>PersonalFinance</category><category>spending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DailyFinance today: good news and bad news about the budget, even employed people are looking for jobs, 2009 looks promising for Saks and Maxx]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/dailyfinance-today-good-news-and-bad-news-about-the-budget-eve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/dailyfinance-today-good-news-and-bad-news-about-the-budget-eve/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/dailyfinance-today-good-news-and-bad-news-about-the-budget-eve/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border-width: 0pt;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/26/the-good-news-and-bad-news-about-the-budget/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/obama_186_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/26/the-good-news-and-bad-news-about-the-budget/">The good news and bad news about the budget</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/26/some-unusual-suspects-among-banks-awaiting-stress-testing/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/moneyflying_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/26/some-unusual-suspects-among-banks-awaiting-stress-testing/">Some unusual suspects among banks awaiting stress testing</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/26/between-saks-and-maxx-2009-seems-promising/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/sakspalms_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td> <a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/26/between-saks-and-maxx-2009-seems-promising/">Between Saks and Maxx, 2009 seems promising</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/26/even-employed-people-are-looking-for-jobs/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/unemployed_200_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/26/even-employed-people-are-looking-for-jobs/">Even employed people are looking for jobs</a> </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/dailyfinance-today-good-news-and-bad-news-about-the-budget-eve/">DailyFinance today: good news and bad news about the budget, even employed people are looking for jobs, 2009 looks promising for Saks and Maxx</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/dailyfinance-today-good-news-and-bad-news-about-the-budget-eve/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1473115/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/dailyfinance-today-good-news-and-bad-news-about-the-budget-eve/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>budget</category><category>dailyfinance</category><category>maxx</category><category>obama</category><category>saks fifth avenue</category><category>SaksFifthAvenue</category><category>stress test</category><category>StressTest</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Budget: $750 billion more for bank bailout, higher hedge fund taxes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/budget-750-billion-more-for-bank-bailout-higher-hedge-fund-ta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/budget-750-billion-more-for-bank-bailout-higher-hedge-fund-ta/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/budget-750-billion-more-for-bank-bailout-higher-hedge-fund-ta/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />President Obama has presented a budget that will yield a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aY8vuevw1NKs&amp;refer=home">$1.75 trillion</a> deficit --12% of GDP. But he promises to slice that deficit in half by the end of his current term. The budget has many items in it, but I found two to be particularly interesting -- the decision to more than double the original TARP and the move to repeal a loophole that enables hedge fund and private equity managers to slice their tax bills in half.</p>
<p>The budget could add as much as $750 billion for bank bailouts. The TARP had allocated $700 billion to that bailout task last year. $350 billion of that has been spent and if the latest $750 billion is added to the yet-to-be-spent second half of the TARP, that leaves $1.1 trillion of taxpayer money going out the door. But for what purpose? We know <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/is-geithner-trying-to-out-pander-paulson/">$16 billion</a> went to bonuses and there have been the multi-million parties as well. But as far as getting more lending out to individuals and companies, the zombie banks that got the money have kept their purse strings tight.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the budget does do something good. It makes private equity and hedge fund managers pay income tax on their income instead of treating that income as if it was a capital gain -- subjecting it to the lower 15% tax rate. I argued this point on <em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/13/debating-private-equity-taxation-with-the-wall-street-journal/">CNBC</a></em> back in July 2007 with the <em>Wall Street Journal's</em> Alan Murray (and he ended up agreeing with me). Unfortunately, closing this loophole would have done much more good when hedge funds and private equity firms were actually making money.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of </em><a href="http://petercohan.com/"><font color="#0072bc"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></font></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><font color="#0072bc"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></font></a>. <em>His eighth book is</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/You-Cant-Order-Change-Turnaround/dp/1591842395/ref=sr_1_2/002-0707230-7400838?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220097046&amp;sr=1-2"><font color="#0072bc">You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing</font></a><em>. </em></p>
<!-- sphereit end --><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/budget-750-billion-more-for-bank-bailout-higher-hedge-fund-ta/">Budget: $750 billion more for bank bailout, higher hedge fund taxes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/budget-750-billion-more-for-bank-bailout-higher-hedge-fund-ta/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1472323/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/budget-750-billion-more-for-bank-bailout-higher-hedge-fund-ta/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>BankBailout</category><category>budget</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Inflation or recession? Give us your perspective]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/inflation-or-recession-give-us-your-perspective/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/inflation-or-recession-give-us-your-perspective/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/inflation-or-recession-give-us-your-perspective/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Inflation/">Inflation</a>:</strong> "An increase in the amount of money and credit in relation to the supply of goods and services; An increase of the general price level; An excessive or persistent increase in wages and costs causing a decline in purchasing power."<br /><br /><strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Recession/">Recession</a>:</strong> "A temporary falling off of business activity during a period when such activity has been generally increasing."<br /><br />(Source: Websters New World Dictionary, Third College Edition)<br /><br />Rather than an opinion piece, which is what I generally write, this little snippet is meant more as a discussion generator than a statement of my own economic view. I earnestly invite our readers to weigh in on the matter. Inflation or recession, are we now experiencing either or both?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/inflation-or-recession-give-us-your-perspective/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Inflation or recession? Give us your perspective</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/inflation-or-recession-give-us-your-perspective/">Inflation or recession? Give us your perspective</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/inflation-or-recession-give-us-your-perspective/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1111269/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/inflation-or-recession-give-us-your-perspective/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>assets</category><category>banking</category><category>budget</category><category>business</category><category>commodities</category><category>consumer price index</category><category>ConsumerPriceIndex</category><category>credit</category><category>dollar</category><category>export</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>import</category><category>income</category><category>inflation</category><category>loan</category><category>recession</category><category>saving</category><category>treasury</category><category>walletpop</category><category>yuan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[File under irony: Bush looks to cut spending by printing fewer copies of budget]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/file-under-irony-bush-looks-to-cut-spending-by-printing-fewer-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/file-under-irony-bush-looks-to-cut-spending-by-printing-fewer-c/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/file-under-irony-bush-looks-to-cut-spending-by-printing-fewer-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/budget.jpg" alt="" />Here's an item that's so laced with irony it defies comment -- I can't come up with a metaphor that does it justice. It's sort of like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, but it's much, much, <em>much</em> more pathetic.<br /><br />President Bush's 2009 budget is expected to lead to a deficit of more than $400 billion. But not to worry, our fearless leader has a plan to cut back on spending.<br /><br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120216774956842537.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">According</a> (subscription required) to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, "In years past, the White House's Office of Management and Budget distributed about 3,000 copies of the budget free to media outlets, congressional offices and elsewhere in the capital. This year, those folks must buy a printed copy or access one free online."<br /><br />Members of Congress can get a copy for $67.50. Ordinary taxpayers hoping to get the details on how their elected officials plan to waste their money and then some will have to pay $213 -- or read it online.<br /><br />The plan will save taxpayers an estimated $1 million over 5 years.<br /><br />So $400 billion divided by $200,000... The President has found a way to shave off 1/2,000,000th of the projected deficit for 2009 that will be passed on to future generations.<br /><br />Keep up the good work!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/file-under-irony-bush-looks-to-cut-spending-by-printing-fewer-c/">File under irony: Bush looks to cut spending by printing fewer copies of budget</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120216774956842537.html?mod=todays_us_page_one>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/file-under-irony-bush-looks-to-cut-spending-by-printing-fewer-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1106830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/file-under-irony-bush-looks-to-cut-spending-by-printing-fewer-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Budget</category><category>budget deficit</category><category>BudgetDeficit</category><category>Bush</category><category>featured</category><category>federal budget</category><category>FederalBudget</category><category>president bush</category><category>PresidentBush</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/george-w-bush.jpg" />American President George Bush announced his <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bush-unveils-31-trillion-spending-plan/20080204114409990002">new budget spending plan</a> today, and the package came out to a total of $3.1 trillion.<br /><br />Today's federal budget proposal marks the first time in America's history that a budget plan has been in excess of $3 trillion. Bush claims that his budget is "good" and "solid" and that the passing of this budget will help keep the troubled American economy growing.<br /><br />All in all, this budget looks to lift government spending by 6% during the fiscal year 2009, and it will probably come to no one's surprise that defense gets a nice little boost from today's budget. Bush is looking to allocate 8.2% of his spending on security, and the budget is looking to stake a $70 billion "placeholder" for war costs during 2009. The Pentagon should be pleased with its figures, as Bush is looking to allocate $515.4 billion its way... the highest allocation since WWII (and represents a 7.5% jump).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/">Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1106092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>Congress</category><category>featured</category><category>federal budget</category><category>FederalBudget</category><category>George Bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>Harry Reid</category><category>HarryReid</category><category>House of Representatives</category><category>HouseOfRepresentatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Judd Gregg</category><category>JuddGregg</category><category>Kent Conrad</category><category>KentConrad</category><category>medicare</category><category>Pentagon</category><category>politics</category><category>Senate</category><category>Steny Hoyer</category><category>StenyHoyer</category><category>war</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Really, really no-frills flying]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/really-really-no-frills-flying/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/really-really-no-frills-flying/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/really-really-no-frills-flying/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a></p><p>Sometimes an innovation that makes perfect sense economically will get blasted by consumers for emotional reasons that have more to do with perception than anything else. Take flying on airplanes for example, where consumers want low fares but also grumble about stuff like having to pay for the peanuts. Irish carrier <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ryanair-holdings-plc-american-depositary-shares/ryaay/nas">Ryanair</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ryanair-holdings-plc-american-depositary-shares/ryaay/nas">RYAAY</a>) has ultra-low fares, but also little in the way of free amenities: Seat assignments, checked bags, early boarding, and food all cost extra.</p>
<p>SkyBus Airlines will be trying that approach here in the States, with fares starting at as little as $10. It's going to charge $5 per checked bag, and will even sell the right to have your company's logo on its planes (I nominate BloggingStocks).</p>
<p><a href="http://ask.skybus.com/about/rules-of-flying.shtml">SkyBus's Rules of Flying</a> sound like they were written by the Soup Nazi from <em>Seinfeld</em>: Bring cash for food, bring a book, don't call us, and don't be late.</p>
<p>Here's what I like about this airline: You only pay for the services you want. People might like the idea of free peanuts and free baggage checking, but, Economics 101 folks: Nothing is really free. Instead of having every passenger absorb the cost of free peanuts, why not just charge the people who want them? It makes perfect sense to me.</p>
<p>We'll see how SkyBus does. It might take some getting used to, but I have to think this is the future of the airline industry.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/really-really-no-frills-flying/">Really, really no-frills flying</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 May 2007 20:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2007/db20070521_537633.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_top+story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/really-really-no-frills-flying/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/900355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/really-really-no-frills-flying/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airlines</category><category>Airplanes</category><category>Budget</category><category>checked bags</category><category>CheckedBags</category><category>early boarding</category><category>Flying</category><category>free peanuts</category><category>low fares</category><category>LowFares</category><category>Rules of Flying</category><category>RulesOfFlying</category><category>RYAAY</category><category>Ryanair</category><category>SkyBus</category><category>Travel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[I made my best investment ever (and didn't consult Jim Cramer about it)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>My wife and I were at our local <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) branch today and we signed some important papers. The documents we put our names to probably represent the single best investment we have made in our time together. Utilizing a portion of a rather handsome income tax return and some carefully thought out timing, we as a couple today reduced our consumer debt load by approximately 25%.</p>
<p>Being in debt has always made my skin crawl, though I fully understand the reasons why we do it. If you want a nice house and a fine automobile or two, the chances are that the only way you can pull it off is by borrowing the funds to make it possible. That doesn't change the fact though that I hate being in debt, and whenever the opportunities present themselves I do what I reasonably can to reduce my debt level.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>I made my best investment ever (and didn't consult Jim Cramer about it)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/">I made my best investment ever (and didn't consult Jim Cramer about it)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/874152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>budgeting</category><category>debt</category><category>dividends</category><category>equity</category><category>free</category><category>interest</category><category>load</category><category>personal finance</category><category>PersonalFinance</category><category>reduce</category><category>reduction</category><category>retirement</category><category>saving money</category><category>SavingMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tip generously without blowing your budget]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/tip-generously-without-blowing-your-budget/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/tip-generously-without-blowing-your-budget/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/tip-generously-without-blowing-your-budget/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div> </div>
<div><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/holidaytip200cs1129.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />There's nothing like year-end tips to spoil one's holiday spirit. Just when you can't stand to spend another cent on a present for friend or family member, you remember all those folks you still owe a gratuity. </div>
<p>For busy families that have a lot of service providers to thank (house cleaners, babysitters, hairdressers, etc.), the tipping tally can easily total in the thousands of dollars. (Read <em>SmartMoney's</em> take on <a href="http://money.aol.com/top5/general/holiday-tipping">what is reasonable and expected</a> for year-end gratuities or take <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/tippingquiz">AOL's tipping quiz</a> to see if you know it all already.)</p>
<div> </div>
<p>As much as you might fantasize, you can't skip the tips. If you want to keep your tipping budget to a reasonable level, you don't have to play scrooge this season. Here's some ideas for how to thank the folks who help you out year-round without busting your budget:</p>
<div> </div>
<div>
<p> </p>
<p>- If you're giving at the low end of the range, include a nice card with some sincere words of thanks. Hopefully the recipients will feel so good about your personal notes, that they won't notice the envelopes were a little light this year. <em>SmartMoney</em> suggests going even further in some cases and sending a note to the service provider's boss saying how terrific that person was. Maybe you'll net them a raise?</p>
<div> </div>
<p>- If the expectation is for some cash and a small gift (as it is for babysitters or housekeepers), skimp on the gift, not the cash. For example, don't give her a $200 cashmere sweater and $50 in cash. Instead, give her some nice soaps and $235 in cash. She may be counting on that cash to buy gifts for her own family.</p>
<div> </div>
<p>- <em>SmartMoney</em> warns against edible gifts and that may be true of ubiquitous homemade brownies or Christmas sugar cookies. But some high-end candy, cheese, fruit, or wine that is truly tasty and nicely wrapped can be very appreciated over the holidays -- and not too expensive.</p>
<div> </div>
<p>- Put the kids to work. To reward those who care for your kids, a handmade card or ornament from junior may be the nicest gift (and the cheapest to provide).</p>
</div>
<div>
<p> </p>
</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/tip-generously-without-blowing-your-budget/">Tip generously without blowing your budget</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Dec 2006 05:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/tip-generously-without-blowing-your-budget/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/713845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/tip-generously-without-blowing-your-budget/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>cash</category><category>hairdresser</category><category>holiday</category><category>tip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 05:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
