<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Stocks at Two-Year High: What Lies Ahead?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/stocks-at-two-year-high-the-way-forward/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/stocks-at-two-year-high-the-way-forward/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/stocks-at-two-year-high-the-way-forward/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/up-arrow.jpg" alt="" />The S&amp;P 500 is now at a two-year high, closing last week at 1,240.40. The index last hit that level in September 2008.</p>
<p>Some analysts believe that the market trades ahead of what it sees in the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/">economy</a> six months out. If that's true, Wall Street expects improved employment, a moderately rising GDP, and early signs of a real estate recovery.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/stocks-at-two-year-high-the-way-forward/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stocks at Two-Year High: What Lies Ahead?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/stocks-at-two-year-high-the-way-forward/">Stocks at Two-Year High: What Lies Ahead?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/stocks-at-two-year-high-the-way-forward/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19756503/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/stocks-at-two-year-high-the-way-forward/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bull market</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SP 500</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Dow Rises, Falls, and Sometimes Meanders for a Long Time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/merrill_lynch_bull_robertoschmidt_afp_20070914.jpg"  alt="" />There are bull markets and bear markets, and while each often display a pattern that matches historical precedents, there are those 'irregular periods' that break the mold. Moreover, investors need to remain cognizant of that fact that an irregular period can be long. Very long. <br />
<br />
For example, consider the period beginning in the mid-1960s. The Dow crossed the 1,000 mark for the first time <a href="http:// http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/djia1900.html">in January 1966</a>. President Lyndon B. Johnson (D-Texas) was in the White House then, and he was in the process of escalating the war in Vietnam. Inflation rose, due to ramping defense and social spending. The Dow soon dropped below 1,000.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Dow Rises, Falls, and Sometimes Meanders for a Long Time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/">The Dow Rises, Falls, and Sometimes Meanders for a Long Time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19500807/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bull market</category><category>dow</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Guru Strategy: Don't Rush into Junk Stocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/guru-strategy-dont-rush-into-junk-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/guru-strategy-dont-rush-into-junk-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/guru-strategy-dont-rush-into-junk-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/afl/" rel="tag">AFLAC Inc (AFL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/rich-moroney-240-x160.jpg" />At the beginning of a bull market, it's often the most speculative stocks that perform the best. As the market has rebounded over the past year, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average/%24indu/dji">$INDU</a>) is up about 40% while the S&amp;P SmallCap 600 Index is up about 58%. And that is exactly why Richard Moroney, editor of <em><a href="http://www.dowtheory.com/">Dow Theory Forecasts</a>, </em>is now sounding warning bells. <br />
<br />
"The risk trade has defied conventional wisdom by continuing this year, tempting some investors to throw out their playbook and join the rush into high risk stocks," says Moroney<em>.</em><br />
<br />
Moroney warns that investors chasing after risky companies will now be paying a premium for low quality merchandise. Instead, he suggests that investors pursue attractively valued stocks with good fundamentals.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/guru-strategy-dont-rush-into-junk-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Guru Strategy: Don't Rush into Junk Stocks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/guru-strategy-dont-rush-into-junk-stocks/">Guru Strategy: Don't Rush into Junk Stocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/guru-strategy-dont-rush-into-junk-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19454851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/guru-strategy-dont-rush-into-junk-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bull market</category><category>Dow Theory Forecasts</category><category>featured</category><category>investing</category><category>Richard Moroney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikhil Hutheesing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investors Beware -- The Stock Market Is About to Hit a Wall]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/investors-beware-the-stock-market-is-about-to-hit-a-wall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/investors-beware-the-stock-market-is-about-to-hit-a-wall/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/investors-beware-the-stock-market-is-about-to-hit-a-wall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/stock-market.jpg" />Last Friday, we learned the economy added 123,000 jobs, the most in three years. Investors everywhere are now waiting for the Dow to cross the 11,000 mark and hoping that the 6% added to the major indexes in March will happen once again in April as we enter earnings season.</p>
<p>Personally, I don't think Dow 11,000 really means anything. But I'll admit I'm pretty fired up about the upcoming first-quarter earnings season. Since the first quarter of 2009 was arguably the worst part of the recession, favorable year-over-year comparisons will lead to blowout results for most companies. In fact, I expect the S&amp;P 500's operating earnings to be up almost 70% during the first quarter on average. With numbers like that, it's easy to imagine the market will post significant gains.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/investors-beware-the-stock-market-is-about-to-hit-a-wall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investors Beware -- The Stock Market Is About to Hit a Wall</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/investors-beware-the-stock-market-is-about-to-hit-a-wall/">Investors Beware -- The Stock Market Is About to Hit a Wall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/investors-beware-the-stock-market-is-about-to-hit-a-wall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19429897/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/investors-beware-the-stock-market-is-about-to-hit-a-wall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>11000</category><category>bull market</category><category>dow</category><category>earnings</category><category>stock market</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Navellier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reuters poll: Recession to last one or more years]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/reuters-poll-recession-to-last-one-or-more-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/reuters-poll-recession-to-last-one-or-more-years/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/reuters-poll-recession-to-last-one-or-more-years/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/merrill_lynch_bull_robertoschmidt_afp_20070914.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The great debate: Have we reached bottom in the financial crisis, or is there more to come? It's a multi-million dollar question.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE53Q47820090427?sp=true">Reuters conducted a poll on April 21-27 to get feedback form analysts across Europe and the US</a>. The sobering conclusion was that the recession could last a year or two more. Most said that the worst is yet to come. Their findings stated: "Financial and macroeconomic stability are still some way off and we don't yet have the foundation for a solid recovery."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/reuters-poll-recession-to-last-one-or-more-years/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reuters poll: Recession to last one or more years</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/reuters-poll-recession-to-last-one-or-more-years/">Reuters poll: Recession to last one or more years</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE53Q47820090427?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/reuters-poll-recession-to-last-one-or-more-years/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1529502/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/reuters-poll-recession-to-last-one-or-more-years/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bear market rally</category><category>BearMarket</category><category>BearMarketRally</category><category>bull market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobless rate highest since ... right before the greatest bull run in history]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/jobless-rate-highest-since-right-before-the-greatest-bull-ru/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/jobless-rate-highest-since-right-before-the-greatest-bull-ru/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/jobless-rate-highest-since-right-before-the-greatest-bull-ru/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img height="339" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The headlines are terrifying. The jobless rate is the highest it's been since 1983 -- 8.1% -- and it could get worse.</p>
<p>"We'll be at 10% unemployment by year end," Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank, told the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123634566437552601.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">Wall Street Journal</a> </em>(subscription required). "What's going to stop it?"</p>
<p>The gloom and doom crew has been winning the day lately, but here's the question: What does it all mean for stocks?</p>
<p>Go back to 1983 for the answer -- four years after <em>BusinessWeek</em> had declared the permanent <a href="http://www.fiendbear.com/deatheq.htm">death of equities</a>. That year marked essentially the beginning of the greatest bull run in history. From 1982 through 1999, the Dow Jones Industrial Average soared from 800 to over 11,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/jobless-rate-highest-since-right-before-the-greatest-bull-ru/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobless rate highest since ... right before the greatest bull run in history</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/jobless-rate-highest-since-right-before-the-greatest-bull-ru/">Jobless rate highest since ... right before the greatest bull run in history</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/jobless-rate-highest-since-right-before-the-greatest-bull-ru/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1481556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/jobless-rate-highest-since-right-before-the-greatest-bull-ru/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Market</category><category>Bull Market</category><category>death of equities</category><category>Joseph LaVorgna</category><category>Stock Market</category><category>Unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow 8,000 stops by to visit again; what's the next level to watch out for?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/dow-8-000-stops-by-to-visit-again-whats-the-next-level-to-watc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/dow-8-000-stops-by-to-visit-again-whats-the-next-level-to-watc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/dow-8-000-stops-by-to-visit-again-whats-the-next-level-to-watc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_down_down_240.jpg" />Once again, <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">the Dow</a> has registered a lame, listless rally and then moved back below 8,000.<br /><br />For those investors who may not follow indices closely, the 8,000 level has psychological but not technical support. The latter measures such things as the number of investors who are buying / selling, whether investors are committing new money to the market etc. <br /><br />Right now a battle is taking place between bulls and bears at the institutional investor level: the bears argue the worst economic news stemming from the financial crisis is yet to come; the bulls say that the worst news is behind us, and that government stimulus, fiscal and monetary, will both stabilize the financial system and get the U.S. economy moving again. <br /><br />The Dow Tuesday closed below 8,000 at 7,949. If the bears can keep the Dow below 8,000, then push it through 7,800, then 7,600, it will not be a pleasant time for investors.  <br /><br />Some institutions may continue to hand-sit until mid-February, preferring to await the Obama Administration's announcement of the exact size of the fiscal stimulus package, now believed to be approaching $725-850 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/dow-8-000-stops-by-to-visit-again-whats-the-next-level-to-watc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow 8,000 stops by to visit again; what's the next level to watch out for?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/dow-8-000-stops-by-to-visit-again-whats-the-next-level-to-watc/">Dow 8,000 stops by to visit again; what's the next level to watch out for?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/dow-8-000-stops-by-to-visit-again-whats-the-next-level-to-watc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1436089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/dow-8-000-stops-by-to-visit-again-whats-the-next-level-to-watc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bull market</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>featured</category><category>resistance</category><category>support</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Aren't stocks cheap now? Yes, but... ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/arent-stocks-cheap-now-yes-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/arent-stocks-cheap-now-yes-but/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/arent-stocks-cheap-now-yes-but/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p>One hears the mantra almost daily, often from friends and relatives:<br /><br /><em>Aren't stocks cheap? Look at those low P/Es! GE is at $15 a share, Intel below $14, Du Pont at about $27. My goodness, the Dow is down to 8,200. Isn't now a good time to buy stocks?</em><br /><br />It is, if you believe <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">the Dow</a> is forming a bottom and/or that the worst of the financial crisis is behind us, and the U.S. economy is set to recover. <br /><br />However, the alternate viewpoint argues that <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">the Dow</a> has not bottomed, could very well fall another 1,000 points, with panic selling (known as <a href="http://www.investorwords.com/6438/capitulation.html">'capitulation'</a> in Wall Street circles) taking the Dow to levels well below that, at least for a short period of time, possibly longer. <br /><br />Hence, purchasing shares for the first time now (or adding to existing positions) given the latter scenario would create an immediate 10% loss, or possibly more.<br /><br /><strong>Monitor corporate earnings and job growth</strong><br /><br />What's a better tack to take concerning when to buy more shares? Monitor U.S. corporate earnings and job growth.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/arent-stocks-cheap-now-yes-but/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Aren't stocks cheap now? Yes, but... </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/arent-stocks-cheap-now-yes-but/">Aren't stocks cheap now? Yes, but... </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/arent-stocks-cheap-now-yes-but/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1371203/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/arent-stocks-cheap-now-yes-but/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bull market</category><category>capitulation</category><category>corporate earnings</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings estimate</category><category>earnings guidance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job creation</category><category>jobs</category><category>pe</category><category>price per earnings</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is now a good time to sell 20% of your stock portfolio?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>Talk to the stock market's bulls and they argue the Dow is <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">forming a bottom at / near 8,000.</a><br /><br />Talk to the bears and they say you're dreaming, if you think the Dow has bottomed at 8,000. <br /><br />What's the typical investor to do?<br /><br />Let's do a condensed, cross-methodology analysis to see if we can arrive at an informed investment decision / conclusion. <br /><br /><strong>Technical Indicators:</strong> Bearish.<br /><strong>Fundamental Indicators:</strong> Bearish.<br /><strong>Monetary Policy:</strong> Officials are doing everything they can to stimulate growth. Bullish.<br /><strong>Fiscal Policy:</strong> More fiscal stimulus should be on the way, in both the U.S. and aboard. Bullish. <br /><br /><strong>Credit Markets:</strong> Recovering, but still strained, with still too much interbank distrust / fear. Bearish.<br /><br /><strong>Geopolitical Risk:</strong> On average, it's about the same as it has been during the past 3-5 years. Neutral.<br /><br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The view from here argues that the outlook for U.S. stocks / stock market is bearish at least for the next six months, and most likely for much of 2009. Further, if Dow 8,000 doesn't hold, the market could fall much more, particularly after 2009 earnings estimates are revised downward, as they are expected to be. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is now a good time to sell 20% of your stock portfolio?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/">Is now a good time to sell 20% of your stock portfolio?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1366798/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-now-a-good-time-to-sell-20-of-your-stock-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bear market rally</category><category>bears</category><category>bull market</category><category>bulls</category><category>dead cat bounce</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What if the Dow didn't fall, but also didn't rise, for 10 years?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/what-if-the-dow-didnt-fall-but-also-didnt-rise-for-10-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/what-if-the-dow-didnt-fall-but-also-didnt-rise-for-10-years/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/what-if-the-dow-didnt-fall-but-also-didnt-rise-for-10-years/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstreets.jpg" alt="" />Investors have become accustomed to bull markets -- long periods of stock price appreciation, i.e. a rising stock market. That's been the norm since the start of publicly-traded stocks in the United States, and certainly a feature of markets in the post-1980 period. <br /><br />Provided that the U.S. economy is growing in a sustainable way and increasing its productive capacity, bear markets have been the exception, the momentary pull-back, when one takes a long view of the investment horizon.<br /><br />The current bear market can be seen in that light, again, provided the nation's economy is on a sustainable growth track with an increasing productive capacity.<br /><br />Still, the key in the above has been the U.S. economy (obviously). Absent a healthy economy, different <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">Dow</a> case studies pop up. <br /><br />For example, what if the Dow didn't fall -- and didn't rise -- for seven years? In other words, a sideways Dow where no progress is made? It seems like a remote possibility, but that's exactly what occurred from <a href="http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/index.cfm?event=showavgDecades&amp;decade=1960">early 1966</a>, when the Dow fell below 1,000, until <a href="http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/index.cfm?event=showavgDecades&amp;decade=1970">late 1972</a>, when the Dow reclaimed the psychologically-significant 1,000 level.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/what-if-the-dow-didnt-fall-but-also-didnt-rise-for-10-years/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What if the Dow didn't fall, but also didn't rise, for 10 years?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/what-if-the-dow-didnt-fall-but-also-didnt-rise-for-10-years/">What if the Dow didn't fall, but also didn't rise, for 10 years?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/what-if-the-dow-didnt-fall-but-also-didnt-rise-for-10-years/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1355525/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/what-if-the-dow-didnt-fall-but-also-didnt-rise-for-10-years/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bull market</category><category>correction</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>pe</category><category>price per earnings</category><category>sustainable growth</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is it a rejuvenated Dow or 'dead cat bounce' Dow?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/29/is-it-a-rejuvenated-dow-or-dead-cat-bounce-dow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/29/is-it-a-rejuvenated-dow-or-dead-cat-bounce-dow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/29/is-it-a-rejuvenated-dow-or-dead-cat-bounce-dow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p>Oil declines by $30 from record highs. Other commodity prices moderate. The dollar rallies. The nation records better-than-expected GDP growth in Q2. <br /><br /><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/seesaw.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />All are positive data points that suggest that the U.S. economy, while it's certainly not in the midst of robust growth, has not run totally into a ditch, either. <br /><br />What do the latest economic data points mean for the <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">Dow Jones Industrial Average,</a> and U.S. stocks, in general, for the next six to nine months? Here's the bullish and bearish cases:<br /><br /><strong>Bullish case:</strong> Technical analysts would cite the Dow's close above the <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">50-day moving average</a> for three consecutive days, the fact that the Dow held support at the 11,000 level, and a series of higher closing highs and higher closing lows in the past two months. <br /><br />Further, technical analysts would also cite the fact that the Dow has completed the volume-light June-July-August summer season (typically bearish for stocks) during a period of anemic growth (if the U.S. economy isn't already in a recession), without plunging to nerve-wracking lows. True, the Dow fell from about 12,400 in June to 11,000 in July, but technicians would cite the aforementioned positive technicals as an argument that a bottom is in place. <br /><br /><strong>Bearish case:</strong> Technical analysts would cite the fact that the Dow, although above the 50-day moving average, nevertheless remains below the <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">200-day moving average</a> -- the toughest moving average line to break in trading. Also, market 'up days' have lacked sustained buying strength as measured by the <a href="http://clearstation.etrade.com/education/trending/hist1.shtml">MACD Histogram.</a><br /><br />Further, and equally important, Dow bears would say that although the Dow has risen from its 11,000 low, the roughly 600-point increase is still well within the range of a correction -- or in this case short-covering -- in a long-term bearish trend. In other words, the Dow's recent rise could be Pyrrhic or false -- a classic example of a 'dead cat bounce.'<br /><br /><strong>Market Analysis:</strong> With all due respect to technical analysts and their indicators, the view here argues that investors/ traders should take their cue from the U.S. economy's fundamentals: specifically, corporate profits and job growth. Absent substantial, sustained gains in each, any Dow rally is viewed with skepticism. <br /><br /><br />**<br /><br /><em>What's your view of the Dow? Is this stock market rally real? Or is it temporary? Let us know what you think.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/29/is-it-a-rejuvenated-dow-or-dead-cat-bounce-dow/">Is it a rejuvenated Dow or 'dead cat bounce' Dow?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/29/is-it-a-rejuvenated-dow-or-dead-cat-bounce-dow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1299107/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/29/is-it-a-rejuvenated-dow-or-dead-cat-bounce-dow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>200-day moving average</category><category>50-day moving average</category><category>bear market</category><category>bear market rally</category><category>bull market</category><category>corporate earnings</category><category>dead cat bounce</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job creation</category><category>job growth</category><category>jobs</category><category>MACD Histogram</category><category>moving averages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Falling knife or opportunity?  You make the call.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/falling-knife-or-opportunity-you-make-the-call/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/falling-knife-or-opportunity-you-make-the-call/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/falling-knife-or-opportunity-you-make-the-call/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/dollarshirtpic.jpg" />We've been on the phone a lot with investors over the past few weeks. I don't know about you but from where we sit, there is a lot of fear in the market. Investors are worried: worried about what's going to be, how low the markets can go, how the dollar will continue to drop, inflation, etc. There's what to worry about.<br /><br />But, there is a counter-Chicken Little story setting up behind the backdrop of fear. Bloomberg has an interesting piece out this morning entitled "<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aDSFgf3DHR_A&amp;refer=home"><span class="news_story_title">Buy Signals Abound in U.S. Stocks Shadowed by 1970s</span></a>". Bloomberg reporters draw comparisons with the almost 20% drop in the S&amp;P 500 (Amex: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-trust-series-1/spy/ase">SPY</a>) we've seen since the October highs. <br /><br />So, are things any different this time? <br /><br />Well, for one, Bloomberg claims companies in the S&amp;P 500 are trading at their cheapest levels in more than 18 years to forecasted profits. That means investors believe that forecasted profits are going to fall way short of projections. If the world doesn't come to an end, Bloomberg thinks there may be an opportunity here.<br /><br />Secondly, valuations versus 10 year Treasuries are also lowest in at least two decades. <br /><br />Investors don't want to hold stocks. I can't blame them. Anyone who's been trying to pick up some value has probably seen their trades go against them. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/falling-knife-or-opportunity-you-make-the-call/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Falling knife or opportunity?  You make the call.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/falling-knife-or-opportunity-you-make-the-call/">Falling knife or opportunity?  You make the call.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aDSFgf3DHR_A&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/falling-knife-or-opportunity-you-make-the-call/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1142696/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/falling-knife-or-opportunity-you-make-the-call/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>BearMarket</category><category>bull market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>featured</category><category>forecast</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>stock</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the bull market over?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/is-the-bull-market-over/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/is-the-bull-market-over/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/is-the-bull-market-over/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>I ran into an interesting article in <em>Fortune</em> titled "<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/29/magazines/fortune/bull_market.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008030303">Don't expect another bull market: Stock returns may never be the same -- at least for this generation of investors</a>." The article made a bold prediction:</p>
<blockquote>Barring a miracle -- or the creation of a New Math of the market variety -- there's no way we'll ever see a bull market along the lines of what so many of us grew up with.</blockquote>
<p>This is very interesting from a sentiment viewpoint. A few years ago, at the height of the dot com boom, some claimed that we were creating a new economy in which the stock market could not go down. Then it crashed.</p>
<p>I say, don't buy into these extremes. In the long run, the market will have ups and downs, but will continue a slow long-term uptrend. We may have rough periods of adjustment -- like we are currently seeing in housing -- but that doesn't mean that the fundamentals have changed. </p>
<p>Articles like this can be a good contrarian sign. As writers predict the end of stock market gains, it may be a sign that we have reached the bottom.<br /><em><br />Kevin Kersten is an Stock and Options Analyst with </em><a href="http://www.investorsobserver.com/aolblogkk"><em>InvestorsObserver.com</em></a><em>. Disclosure note: Mr. Kersten owns and/or controls a diversified portfolio of long and short positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/is-the-bull-market-over/">Is the bull market over?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/is-the-bull-market-over/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1132045/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/is-the-bull-market-over/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear marlet</category><category>BearMarlet</category><category>bull market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sentiment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment hits 5%, and the Dow nosedives 256 points]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/unemployment-hits-5-and-the-dow-nosedives-256-points/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/unemployment-hits-5-and-the-dow-nosedives-256-points/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/unemployment-hits-5-and-the-dow-nosedives-256-points/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p>Now that's not the way to close out the first week of the new year: for the week the Dow fell 4.3%, the Nasdaq declined 6.3% and the S&amp;P fell 4.5.%. <br /><br />Further, there are various ways to interpret <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui">the Dow's 256-point drop</a> to 12,800.18 Friday. <br /><br />[The Nasdaq closed down 98.03 points to 2,504.65, the S&amp;P 500 closed down 35.53 points to 1,411.63. Oil fell $1.27 to $97.21, gold declined $3.40 to $865.70, and the 10-year U.S. Treasury closed at 3.85%.]<br /><br />Obviously, Wall Street's current consensus - - its chief culprit - - is the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">December 2007 job report</a>, announced by the U.S. Labor Department, which indicated that the U.S. economy created just 18,000 new jobs - - a whopping 52,000 shy of the 70,000-job estimate.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/unemployment-hits-5-and-the-dow-nosedives-256-points/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment hits 5%, and the Dow nosedives 256 points</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/unemployment-hits-5-and-the-dow-nosedives-256-points/">Unemployment hits 5%, and the Dow nosedives 256 points</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/unemployment-hits-5-and-the-dow-nosedives-256-points/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1077617/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/unemployment-hits-5-and-the-dow-nosedives-256-points/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sales</category><category>bear market</category><category>bull market</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing</category><category>job growth</category><category>jobs</category><category>Nasdaq</category><category>oil</category><category>recession</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five triggers for a catastrophic market decline]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/5-triggers-to-catastrophic-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/5-triggers-to-catastrophic-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/5-triggers-to-catastrophic-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p>In case anyone is still feeling bullish, Paul Farrell of <em>MarkeWatch </em>has <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/you-pick-20-tipping-points/story.aspx?guid=%7BDF996C81%2D774A%2D4D3E%2D87D0%2D5743138A9AF3%7D">produced a list of 20 triggers</a> that will end what he calls "the aging bull." Here are some of his suggestions for possible "tipping points" that will bring an abrupt end to all this fun. Here are some of the ones I think could be particularly catastrophic:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Trade imbalance </li>
    <li>Real Estate markets problems </li>
    <li>Skyrocketing Oil </li>
    <li>Surging consumer debt </li>
    <li>Issues of international credibility </li>
</ul>
<p>Interestingly, I disagree strongly with his concern about "Washington politics in endless gridlock." Isn't that a good thing? If the best government is the least government, what could be better than a bunch of bureaucrats in Congress arguing and accomplishing nothing -- i.e. not spending our money?</p>
<p>Take a look at the list and let us know what you think the top concerns are.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/5-triggers-to-catastrophic-market/">Five triggers for a catastrophic market decline</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/you-pick-20-tipping-points/story.aspx?guid=%7BDF996C81%2D774A%2D4D3E%2D87D0%2D5743138A9AF3%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/5-triggers-to-catastrophic-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/954953/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/5-triggers-to-catastrophic-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>BearMarket</category><category>bull market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>MarketWatch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market sees biggest upswing in almost a year: Recession back in closet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/market-sees-biggest-upswing-in-almost-a-year-recession-back-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/market-sees-biggest-upswing-in-almost-a-year-recession-back-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/market-sees-biggest-upswing-in-almost-a-year-recession-back-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p>  The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average-index/%24indu/dji">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/stocks-jump-higher-on-economic-data/20070613155509990001">rose today by 187 points</a>, a 1.41% rise. The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nasdaq-composite-index/%24compx/nai">NASDAQ</a> rose by 32 points, or 1.28% and the vaunted <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sand-38-p-500-index/%24inx/cmi">S&amp;P 500 Index</a> by 22 points or 1.52%. The markets were relatively benign until the details emerged from the Federal Reserve's Beige Book.</p>
<p> The Beige Book is released eight times per year, and is the collective wisdom of the 12 different Fed Governors. The news was better than expected, and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ten-year-u-s-treasury-note/%28tc10y/bss">10-year treasury note</a>, which was topping out at 5.25%, began to sink and investors re-focused on the equities market. </p>
<p> The details from the Beige Book report was just the music the equity investor wanted -- needed -- to hear. Capital goods orders were picking up and the job market was, indeed, stabilizing. To boot, the real symphony continued when the Fed indicated there was no upward pressure on wage prices, thus stemming one of the legs of inflation. Consumer spending appears to remain in a healthy pattern, with general retail sales up a surprising 1.6%, versus the expectations of 0.8%. The consumer is still in a position to sustain economic growth.</p>
<p>  The indicators from the Federal Reserve basically put the "R -word": <em>Recession</em>, back into the closet. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/market-sees-biggest-upswing-in-almost-a-year-recession-back-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Market sees biggest upswing in almost a year: Recession back in closet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/market-sees-biggest-upswing-in-almost-a-year-recession-back-in/">Market sees biggest upswing in almost a year: Recession back in closet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/market-sees-biggest-upswing-in-almost-a-year-recession-back-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/917588/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/market-sees-biggest-upswing-in-almost-a-year-recession-back-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10-year treasuries</category><category>10-year treasury</category><category>10-yearTreasuries</category><category>10-yearTreasury</category><category>beige book</category><category>BeigeBook</category><category>biggest one-day gain</category><category>BiggestOne-dayGain</category><category>bull</category><category>bull market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>ConsumerConfidence</category><category>djia</category><category>dow</category><category>dow jones</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJones</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>fed</category><category>fed beige book</category><category>FedBeigeBook</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>one-day gain</category><category>One-dayGain</category><category>the dow</category><category>TheDow</category><category>treasury note</category><category>TreasuryNote</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bull or Bear Market:  Aiming at Q3]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/bull-or-bear-market-aiming-at-q3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/bull-or-bear-market-aiming-at-q3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/bull-or-bear-market-aiming-at-q3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p>Market sentiment seems to be favoring the bears again. My cursory research indicates that 65% of investors are again thinking about an impending decline while the other 35% are still cautiously optimistic. It's only seldom in these last few weeks that I came across the occasional person who insists that the bull charge, which began in 2002, shows no signs of relenting. Just the fact that there has been a noticeable increase in the past few weeks (even before these past few days of declines) in the volume of discussions and analysis regarding how to recognize a bear market is coming, how to prepare for it's arrival and what to do when it gets here, signals to me that investors are getting skittish. The funny thing is that it's almost a universally accepted fact that no one can truly predict a bear market turn.</p>
<p>I gave a warning a couple weeks prior to the last contraction that I thought one was coming. That quick downward slide in fact happened. I'm now going on record again as declaring that the bear is coming for another swipe. I expect that this time the cut will go deeper and bleed a bit longer. (Indeed, I originally wrote this post after Tuesday's sell-off, but already this downturn is longer and deeper than the last). Last time around, I sent you that message based solely on gut instinct with little else to back it up. This time, however, I'll clue you in to some of my thinking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/bull-or-bear-market-aiming-at-q3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bull or Bear Market:  Aiming at Q3</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/bull-or-bear-market-aiming-at-q3/">Bull or Bear Market:  Aiming at Q3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/bull-or-bear-market-aiming-at-q3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/911674/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/bull-or-bear-market-aiming-at-q3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Market</category><category>BearMarket</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>Bull Market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>Contraction</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>HillaryClinton</category><category>inflation</category><category>Market Correction</category><category>MarketCorrection</category><category>minimum wage</category><category>MinimumWage</category><category>stagflation</category><category>union busting</category><category>UnionBusting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the Mini-Bear market a real bear, or just a hamster?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/is-the-mini-bear-market-a-real-bear-or-just-a-hamster/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/is-the-mini-bear-market-a-real-bear-or-just-a-hamster/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/is-the-mini-bear-market-a-real-bear-or-just-a-hamster/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p>DJIA 13,266.73; -198.94 (-1.48%)<br />S&amp;P500 1,490.72; -26.66 (-1.76%)<br />NASDAQ 2,541.38; -45.80 (-1.77%)<br />10YR Bond 5.10%; +0.13%<br /><br />We have gone from a raging bull market to what has felt like a sudden bear market in just three days. The DJIA has seen 3 consecutive days with triple-digit drops. Since the highs on Monday June 4, the Dow is down 456.64, although this is only a 3.327% drop. The old rule of thumb for panic buying on severe market drops is after a 5% drop, and that would require the DJIA to reach 13,037.20. Keep in mind that the numbers are right, but the theory of buying the 5% dip is more rough in nature and not exact.<br /><br />Today you can chalk up to a very negative outlook <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/06/bill_gross_high.html">from Bond mogul Bill Gross</a> of PIMCO. PIMCO recently added Alan Greenspan to its advisory board, and Mr. Gross didn't waste any time in taking it upon himself to begin sounding like the ex-Chairman of the Fed. You can see the summary comments if you wish, and some of the projections are odd. The old 4.0% to 5.5% range for the 10-year US Treasury Note is now moved up to a wider 4.0% to 6.5% range. This is over a 3 to 5 year period, and the article does discuss the expected weakness ahead combined with commodity inflation ultimately being at-risk for pass-throughs. <br /><br />It will be interesting to see if Jim Cramer maintains his high DJIA target for the year and if he bails on <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/01/cramers_top_3x3.html">his top 2007 picks</a>, but seeing as that he just gave his DJIA <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/05/cramers_3rd_bat.html">component targets</a> it would be hard to imagine a real change of heart. Here are Cramer's <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/06/cramers_new_fou.html">New 4 Horsemen of Technology</a> he just gave last night.<br /><br />These drops often feel severe, but unless it's a scenario of "it's different this time" then these may just be bigger opportunities. <br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/is-the-mini-bear-market-a-real-bear-or-just-a-hamster/">Is the Mini-Bear market a real bear, or just a hamster?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/is-the-mini-bear-market-a-real-bear-or-just-a-hamster/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/913241/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/is-the-mini-bear-market-a-real-bear-or-just-a-hamster/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>bear market</category><category>Bill Gross</category><category>bull market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>PIMCO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Private equity shifts gears to technology]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/private-equity-shifts-gears-to-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/private-equity-shifts-gears-to-technology/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/private-equity-shifts-gears-to-technology/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cien/" rel="tag">Ciena Corp (CIEN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/">Private equity</a> and investors in general are beginning to open up their pocketbooks for technology. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">Palm Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">PALM</a>) announced a deal with Elevation Partners which agreed to invest $325 million for a 25 percent stake in Palm.<br /><br />Also, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/avaya-inc/av/nys">Avaya Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/avaya-inc/av/nys">AV</a>) is being picked up for a nice premium, $17.50 per share or $8.2 billion by <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/silver-lake-partners/">Silver Lake Partners</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/texas-pacific-group/">TPG Capital</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ciena-corporation/cien/nas">Ciena Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ciena-corporation/cien/nas">CIEN</a>) went to market and issued $450 million in convertible debt. And earlier this year, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/sunw/nas">Sun Microsystems Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/sunw/nas">SUNW</a>) picked up cash from <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/kkr/">Kohlberg Kravis Roberts</a> in the form of a convertible stock.<br /><br />Slowly but surely, private equity and investor interest in technology is picking up. This could be the very early stages of a big bull market run for tech stocks.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/private-equity-shifts-gears-to-technology/">Private equity shifts gears to technology</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/private-equity-shifts-gears-to-technology/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/910925/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/private-equity-shifts-gears-to-technology/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AV</category><category>Avaya</category><category>bull market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>CIEN</category><category>Ciena</category><category>Ciena Corp</category><category>CienaCorp</category><category>Elevation Partners</category><category>ElevationPartners</category><category>KKR</category><category>Kohlberg Kravis Roberts</category><category>KohlbergKravisRoberts</category><category>Palm</category><category>Palm Inc</category><category>PalmInc</category><category>private equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><category>Silver Lake Partners</category><category>SilverLakePartners</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><category>SUNW</category><category>technology</category><category>TPG Capital</category><category>TpgCapital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sentiment: Pessimism still reigns]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/sentiment-pessimism-still-reigns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/sentiment-pessimism-still-reigns/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/sentiment-pessimism-still-reigns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>Despite the U.S. stock market's continued rally, investors are becoming increasingly more pessimistic.<br /><br />The AAII Index registered 33% bulls and 45% bears, less bulls and more bears as the market goes higher and higher.<br /><br /><a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118015898887215692.html?mod=article-outset-box"><em>Barron's</em></a> was also filled with negative sentiment. Steve Leuthold, of Leuthold Group, had little positive to day about the market. In addition, Barron's back-page editorial wrote of the structure bear market and high inflation of the 1970s. Further, even this week's book reviews spread negative vibes. Bubblicious, a history of bubble mania (which sounds like an excellent read), wrote of wildly over extended markets.<br /><br />Mike Santoli titled <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118015929760815719-search.html?KEYWORDS=leuthold&amp;COLLECTION=barrons/6month">his piece</a> "The Bull Battle Fatigue," evidence of which is hard to find since the bull market is showing little sign of ending its upward ascent.<br /><br />Despite a very good market for 2007, few want to suggest that this is simply a good and healthy bull market. Every rally leads to more and more pessimism.<br /><br />Wait for the classic sentiment indicates to show too much optimism before becoming negative on the market.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/sentiment-pessimism-still-reigns/">Sentiment: Pessimism still reigns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/sentiment-pessimism-still-reigns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/910184/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/sentiment-pessimism-still-reigns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barron's</category><category>bear market</category><category>BearMarket</category><category>bull market</category><category>BullMarket</category><category>Leuthold</category><category>pessimism</category><category>Santoli</category><category>sentiment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
