<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft doesn't Yahoo!: Insider says big merger not forthcoming]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/microsoft-doesnt-yahoo-insider-says-big-merger-not-forthcomin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/microsoft-doesnt-yahoo-insider-says-big-merger-not-forthcomin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/microsoft-doesnt-yahoo-insider-says-big-merger-not-forthcomin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/yhoo.bmp" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> Corporation (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has been hungry for online advertising companies lately. Of course, the latest deal was a zinger: $6 billion for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>).<br /><br />In light of all this, it seems natural that Mr. Softy would buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). But Microsoft's chief advertising strategist, Yusuf Mehdi, threw <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a31Nxu0OAFag&amp;refer=news">cold water</a> on this and said "[w]e have all of the pieces we need to move forward.''<br /><br />What to make of this? I had a chance to interview Allan B. Krans, who is an analyst with <a href="http://www.tbri.com">Technology Business Research</a> (TBR). According to him:<br /><br />"I agree with the statement that Microsoft has all of the tools needed to be successful in the online business. However, a solid toolset alone will not spur an improvement in Microsoft's online business. Microsoft needs to drive online search traffic in order to attract advertisers to its toolset. For this reason, we believe a merger/acquisition with Yahoo! continues to make sense for Microsoft. Combining the two companies' respective shares of the online search market gives Microsoft the opportunity to drive search traffic and leverage its newly compiled advertising toolset."<br /><br />I also got this from John Byrne, who is also an analyst with TBR:<br /><br />"At this point I think maybe Yahoo is the stickler though - they've just implemented Project Panama and they probably feel like they're going to show real improvement over the next few quarters which would increase their value without an acquisition. Then maybe next year they're in a much stronger position."<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/microsoft-doesnt-yahoo-insider-says-big-merger-not-forthcomin/">Microsoft doesn't Yahoo!: Insider says big merger not forthcoming</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 May 2007 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/microsoft-doesnt-yahoo-insider-says-big-merger-not-forthcomin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/904344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/microsoft-doesnt-yahoo-insider-says-big-merger-not-forthcomin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>allan krans</category><category>AllanKrans</category><category>buyout</category><category>buyout rumor</category><category>BuyoutRumor</category><category>john byrne</category><category>JohnByrne</category><category>krans</category><category>mehdi</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft buying yahoo</category><category>MicrosoftBuyingYahoo</category><category>msft</category><category>rumor</category><category>rumors</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><category>yusuf</category><category>yusuf mehdi</category><category>YusufMehdi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ValueClick gets even more value]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vclk/" rel="tag">ValueClick Inc (VCLK)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/vlck.bmp" alt="" />Today (around 1 p.m.) <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">ValueClick</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">VCLK</a>) stock is up a healthy 15% to $34.50. Back in January, the stock was trading at about $23.<br /><br />Of course, the betting is that this online advertising operator will get scooped up like its peers, such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">24/7 Real Media</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">TFSM</a>), and DoubleClick. Hey, why not?<br /><br />The problem is that the mega cap internet players such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) have already made deals in the space. Instead, the suitors that are left can't really muster the premium pricing. These companies include the likes of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActieCorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>).<br /><br />While Microsoft or Google may want to bulk up even more, the fact remains that this is pure speculation. In fact, ValueClick is a hodge-podge of different sites and is more a technology play. It's like 24/7 Real Media, which didn't snag a big premium on its deal.<br /><br />So, as always, investors need to be very careful on this one.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/">ValueClick gets even more value</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/900612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aqnt</category><category>Buyout rumor</category><category>BuyoutRumor</category><category>goog</category><category>iaci</category><category>msft</category><category>Online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>tfsm</category><category>twx</category><category>vclk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's shopping cart: eBay?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/microsoft-s-shopping-cart-ebay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/microsoft-s-shopping-cart-ebay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/microsoft-s-shopping-cart-ebay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/taulli/156932333/"><img height="185" alt="ebay" hspace="4" src="http://static.flickr.com/59/156932333_92ae444028_m.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>There are a couple things that are typical with buyout rumors:&nbsp; a) they are fun to talk about, b) the companies involved have lagging stock prices and c) usually the deal doesn't happen.<br /><br />A recent piece in the <em>New York Post</em> speculates that <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a> and <a href="http://www.ebay.com">eBay</a> are in talks for a mega combination.&nbsp; Sources?&nbsp; Of course, they are unnamed (probably because of the federal securities laws, huh?) On the face of it, a deal with eBay would bring much to Microsoft: leadership in auctions, which is a cash cow business; a rapidly growing VOIP business through Skype; and a lucrative online payments business, aka, PayPal.</p>
<p>But, somehow, such a deal would probably fall apart -- say on valuation or antitrust grounds.<br /><br />So, in the spirit of rumors, how about something more interesting:&nbsp; eBay goes private.&nbsp; </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/microsoft-s-shopping-cart-ebay/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's shopping cart: eBay?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/microsoft-s-shopping-cart-ebay/">Microsoft's shopping cart: eBay?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 May 2006 09:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/microsoft-s-shopping-cart-ebay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/623415/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/microsoft-s-shopping-cart-ebay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buyout rumor</category><category>BuyoutRumor</category><category>ebay</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Private equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 09:53:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
