General Motors Corp.'s (NYSE: GM) first quarter results may not be as bad as they look, even though they are horrendous.

The company missed Wall Street forecasts largely because of losses its former financial business incurred in the suprime mortgage market. Net income was $62 million, or 11 cents per share, compared with $602 million, or $1.06 a year earlier. Revenue fell 16% to $43.9 billion. Excluding one-time items, profit was 17 cents per share. Analysts had expected profit of 87 cents on revenue of $40.9 billion, according to Thomson Financial.

Nonetheless, the automotive business had a $272 million profit, down from $295 million, helped by the cost-cutting undertaken by Chief Executive Rick Wagoner. Profit in the automotive segment on an adjusted basis was $304 million, up from $40 million.

So far, investors have indicated that they believe GM's challenges are more daunting than its rivals. The automaker's shares have lagged both Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) and DaimlerChrylser AG (NYSE: DCX).

But has the market unfairly penalized GM? Is all of the bad news priced into GM's stock?

Anyone looking for a true contrarian bet should consider buying the shares. Remember people don't get rich following the crowd.

Are GM's results as bad as they look? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 03 May 2007 09:02:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.