<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota to recall around 3.8 million vehicles]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/toyota-tm-to-recall-around-3-8-million-vehicles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/toyota-tm-to-recall-around-3-8-million-vehicles/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/toyota-tm-to-recall-around-3-8-million-vehicles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><img alt="Toyota safety recall" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/toyotapic.jpg" />The world's largest auto maker, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) announced Tuesday that is was about to issue the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE58S69820090929">biggest recall in the company's history</a>, as problems with some floor mats has led to numerous accidents and at least five deaths.<br />
<br />
The recall involves eight different models of Toyota and Lexus vehicles manufactured and sold in the U.S. over the past six years, and include the popular Prius hybrid. Apparently, there is a problem with the driver side floor mats that result in the mats coming loose and jamming down the accelerator.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/toyota-tm-to-recall-around-3-8-million-vehicles/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota to recall around 3.8 million vehicles</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/toyota-tm-to-recall-around-3-8-million-vehicles/">Toyota to recall around 3.8 million vehicles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/toyota-tm-to-recall-around-3-8-million-vehicles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19178766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/toyota-tm-to-recall-around-3-8-million-vehicles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>Avalon</category><category>Camry</category><category>car</category><category>featured</category><category>Lexus</category><category>Prius</category><category>recalls</category><category>safety</category><category>safety recall</category><category>SafetyRecall</category><category>Tacoma</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><category>transportation</category><category>Tundra</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford planning more fuel-efficient 6-speed engines]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/ford-planning-more-fuel-efficient-6-speed-engines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/ford-planning-more-fuel-efficient-6-speed-engines/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/ford-planning-more-fuel-efficient-6-speed-engines/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/ford.jpg" alt="" />Gasoline prices continue to increase along with crude prices, and the latter seem to find a new record every single day. Wasn't it just a few months ago that the media was going crazy about oil reaching the $100 per barrel mark? It hit $122 this week. Now, that's not a year later; that's less than half a year later. It's not surprising then that automakers with an inflexible SUV-selling strategy are getting pummeled, while automakers with a decent offering of gas-efficient vehicles are seeing product mix changes in retail sales.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>), which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/24/ford-f-drives-home-a-profit/">showed a surprising profit</a> in its most recent quarter, said that it plans to really <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jPTdBBYspwqz7xQ0Mix2m7Ncny8gD90GOMP01">up the presence of gas-efficient six-speed transmissions</a> by the end of 2009, and wants to have these transmissions in 98% of its North American vehicles by 2012. If Ford follows through with this commitment, it'll be a game-changer for the industry. And, it will force <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) to do the same thing. Ford stated that the newer 6-speed automatics will get 4% to 6% better gas mileage than the standard 4-speed and 5-speed automatic transmissions.<br /><br />GM is not sitting idly by at the same time, though. It debuted a 6-speed automatic transmission in the popular 2008 Chevy Malibu, which it is pitting as a strong competitor to market leaders <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-ltd-honda-giken-kogyo-kabushiki-kaisha-japan/hmc/nys">Honda Motor</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-ltd-honda-giken-kogyo-kabushiki-kaisha-japan/hmc/nys">HMC</a>) Accord and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) Camry. Will the new trend in the consumer vehicle market be smaller 4-cylinder engines with advanced, fuel-efficient 6-speed automatic transmissions? You can count on it until oil prices fall to $50 a barrel. And, that'll be when pigs fly.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/ford-planning-more-fuel-efficient-6-speed-engines/">Ford planning more fuel-efficient 6-speed engines</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 May 2008 10:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jPTdBBYspwqz7xQ0Mix2m7Ncny8gD90GOMP01>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/ford-planning-more-fuel-efficient-6-speed-engines/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1189582/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/ford-planning-more-fuel-efficient-6-speed-engines/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accord</category><category>camry</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>Ford Motor</category><category>Ford Motor Corp.</category><category>FordMotor</category><category>FordMotorCorp.</category><category>Fuel efficiency</category><category>FuelEfficiency</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>hmc</category><category>honda</category><category>tm</category><category>toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bloggingstockcast: will oil's new heights help propel Toyota to #1?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/bloggingstockcast-will-oils-new-heights-help-propel-toyota-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/bloggingstockcast-will-oils-new-heights-help-propel-toyota-to/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/bloggingstockcast-will-oils-new-heights-help-propel-toyota-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p>Oil recently climbed up to that magic number: $100 a barrel. Along with it, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corporation (ADR)</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>)  has risen to new heights, getting ready to possibly take #1 car manufacturer here in the USA.  <object width="300" height="255"><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="movie" value="http://uncutvideo.aol.com/v6.334/en-US/uc_videoplayer.swf" /><param name="FlashVars" value="aID=110d8b7972610bc4bba56a9f5942a9331&amp;site=http://uncutvideo.aol.com/"/><embed src="http://uncutvideo.aol.com/v6.334/en-US/uc_videoplayer.swf" wmode="opaque" FlashVars="aID=110d8b7972610bc4bba56a9f5942a9331&amp;site=http://uncutvideo.aol.com/" width="300" height="255" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/bloggingstockcast-will-oils-new-heights-help-propel-toyota-to/">Bloggingstockcast: will oil's new heights help propel Toyota to #1?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/bloggingstockcast-will-oils-new-heights-help-propel-toyota-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1076812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/bloggingstockcast-will-oils-new-heights-help-propel-toyota-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$100 barrel oil</category><category>$100BarrelOil</category><category>bloggingstockcast</category><category>camry</category><category>prius</category><category>saturn</category><category>the toyota way</category><category>TheToyotaWay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota earnings rise, still car king]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/toyota-tm-earnings-rise-still-car-king/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/toyota-tm-earnings-rise-still-car-king/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/toyota-tm-earnings-rise-still-car-king/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/toyota-tm-logo.jpg" alt="Toyota (NYSE: TM) logo" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) posted a 2.9% increase in operating profit on cost cuts and a stronger dollar. Sales success in areas outside the U.S., including Russia and China, are likely to give the Japanese company its seventh straight year of record profits. Toyota sales in the U.S. and Japan were down a bit due to weak overall car sales in both countries. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSWRI72335220071107?pageNumber=3">According to</a> Reuters, "Second-quarter net profit grew 11.1 percent to 451 billion yen, as stronger sales in Europe, Asia and other markets eclipsed the slide in the United States and Japan, Toyota's two biggest markets. Revenue rose 11.2 percent to 6.49 trillion yen."</p>
<p>The earnings results serve as a reminder that Toyota is still, by far, the world's strongest car company. Its recent stock price drop, recalls, and downgrade in the <em>Consumer Reports</em> quality survey led the market to think that the company's dominance of its industry might start to fade. The firm's latest earnings report is likely to mute that kind of talk.</p>
<p>Toyota is doing well because it has been adroit at entering new markets with its current cars, like the Camry. These models are inexpensive, use less gas than most, and are still highly reliable. They are products that depend very little on trying to change tastes in each market. </p>
<p>The company has also been ahead of the trend with alternative energy cars like the Prius, which has become a very big seller for Toyota.</p>
<p>Toyota may be having a bad turn, but it is still a number of steps ahead of the competition.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/toyota-tm-earnings-rise-still-car-king/">Toyota earnings rise, still car king</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSWRI72335220071107?pageNumber=3>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/toyota-tm-earnings-rise-still-car-king/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1032547/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/toyota-tm-earnings-rise-still-car-king/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Camry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Prius</category><category>tm</category><category>toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Detroit joins the car wars]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/detroit-joins-the-car-wars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/detroit-joins-the-car-wars/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/detroit-joins-the-car-wars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/chevroletmalibu.jpg" alt="" />Can <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) make a good car? After years of claiming that they can't make money with passenger cars, American automakers are finally taking the car market seriously. The fat years of making glorified pickup trucks tricked out with leather seats and premium sound systems -- better known as SUVs -- are now over, and Detroit finds itself in a bit of a pickle. The Americans may have ignored the basics of making well-designed cars, not gas-guzzling trucks, for so long that they may not be able to catch up with the leaders, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys">Honda</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys">HMC</a>).<br /><br />The problem is that foreign automakers now have an enormous lead in design and manufacturing expertise when it comes to passenger cars. The Toyota Camry and the Honda Accord have long been the leading sedans in the U.S., and for good reason. They are roomy, comfortable, very well designed and made, and reasonably efficient. Their surprisingly powerful yet nearly silent engines last for hundreds of thousands of miles, which helps maintain resale values. And they are profitable: Toyota reportedly clears $1,000 per Camry, and with 400,000 Camry sedans sold last year in the U.S., that's a good chunk of change that any car company would be happy with.<br /><br />Nevertheless, the competition for sedan sales is heating up. As <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118765407699403531.html?mod=aol_wsj_hs&amp;ru=aol">reports</a>, GM is pushing the Chevrolet Malibu as an American alternative to the Camry and the Accord. Ford, too, is entering the fray, changing the name of the Ford 500 to the Taurus in an effort to recapture the glory of that hallowed name. (I think this shows just how desperate Ford is, given that the Taurus' glory days were in the 1980s and that the car sold so poorly in recent years that it was terminated.) <br /><br />But it may be too late. As John Casesa, a former Wall Street auto analyst, says in the <em>Journal</em> piece, "The ship has sailed in the midsize sedan segment . . . Camry and Accord are now established titans in that part of the market." Even worse, Detroit may not be able to rule the second tier under Toyota and Honda. Other foreign manufactures, including Nissan and Hyundai, are making very good cars these days. Starting at under $18,000, Hyundai's Sonata sedan is a particularly strong alternative to the Camry and the Accord. So there isn't much room for the Malibu and the Taurus. It looks like Detroit may pay the price for ignoring cars so long for many years to come.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/detroit-joins-the-car-wars/">Detroit joins the car wars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118765407699403531.html?mod=aol_wsj_hs&amp;ru=aol>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/detroit-joins-the-car-wars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/970937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/detroit-joins-the-car-wars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Accord</category><category>Camry</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>HMC</category><category>Honda Motor</category><category>HondaMotor</category><category>Hyundai Sonata</category><category>HyundaiSonata</category><category>John Casesa</category><category>JohnCasesa</category><category>Nissan</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota Motor Corp.</category><category>ToyotaMotorCorp.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rainey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors (GM) pits new Chevy Malibu against Toyota (TM) Camry]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/general-motors-gm-pits-new-chevy-malibu-against-toyota-tm-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/general-motors-gm-pits-new-chevy-malibu-against-toyota-tm-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/general-motors-gm-pits-new-chevy-malibu-against-toyota-tm-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) has announced that it will spend $100 million this year to advertise the Chevy Malibu as a suitable alternative to the best-selling <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) Camry. Although GM <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/24/theyre-1-in-first-quarter-toyota-tops-gm-as-worlds-top-auto/">recently lost the top global spot to Toyota as the world's largest automaker this year</a>, this advertising bet sound a little hokey to me. Can GM really convince Americans that an aging nameplate like the Malibu can compete against the rock-solid image of the Camry? Although it's an all-new design, that may not be enough for most customers.<br /><br />The Camry, I suspect, sells in such great volume because of the perceived reliability and reputation just the name has. I can't count how many times I've heard a "300,000 mile" story from a Toyota Camry owner. By my estimation, Camry owners (and even prospective buyers) have more loyalty to the Camry than all other cars combined -- ever.<br /><br />What could GM pit against the Camry for a winning proposition, though? Invent a new nameplate (or re-badge one) and build a reliable and comparison-based marketing campaign? The perception of the "Malibu" nameplate is not even in the same ballpark as the long-standing reputation the Camry enjoys. It may be true that GM's cars are just as reliable and as solidly-built as Toyota's vehicles (many of which are built in the U.S. by Americans). But I'm not sure that's how people buy cars in most cases. Past reputations, word-of-mouth and perceived benefits are incredibly strong here. Can the Malibu dethrone that thinking from a prospective Camry owner? <a href="http://www.buffalonews.com/businesstoday/businessfinance/story/144177.html?imw=Y">I doubt $100 million will even make a dent.<br /></a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/general-motors-gm-pits-new-chevy-malibu-against-toyota-tm-ca/">General Motors (GM) pits new Chevy Malibu against Toyota (TM) Camry</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.buffalonews.com/businesstoday/businessfinance/story/144177.html?imw=Y>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/24/theyre-1-in-first-quarter-toyota-tops-gm-as-worlds-top-auto/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/general-motors-gm-pits-new-chevy-malibu-against-toyota-tm-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/969246/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/general-motors-gm-pits-new-chevy-malibu-against-toyota-tm-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Camry</category><category>Chevrolet</category><category>Chevy Malibu</category><category>ChevyMalibu</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>TM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors vs. Toyota: Battle of the Brands]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/general-motors-vs-toyota-battle-of-the-brands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/general-motors-vs-toyota-battle-of-the-brands/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/general-motors-vs-toyota-battle-of-the-brands/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/battle-for-best-brands">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and watch out for more Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p><iframe width="175" scrolling="no" height="125" frameborder="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1089&amp;view=108181&amp;pollId=108269&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1" border="0"></iframe>The sad part about this subject is watching these two companies going in almost opposite directions -- at least for now. General Motors <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) has a current market capitalization of $18 billion versus the behemoth <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) with a massive market capitalization of $236 billion, over 13 times bigger than GM. Yet on the surface one would never guess these numbers as their revenues are fairly close in comparison: GM for 2007, estimates revenues of $173 billion, and Toyota's at $200 billion. </p>
<p>It's what's underneath the hood that distinguishes these companies. </p>
<p>Toyota has just come off a five-year period of growth in its per-share earnings at 26% per year, an astounding accomplishment for such a large company. General Motors has experienced flat to negative earnings per share growth over the same five-year period. Toyota is opening new plants, both in Japan and the U.S., to handle demand, while General Motors is closing plants to save costs and resources. </p>
<p>Toyota has set itself apart as the undisputed world leader with the hybrid auto: half combustible engine, half battery powered. The hybrids are still at a price premium to comparable standard combustible, gasoline-powered models, but they will close that gap over the next two or three years. The hybrids come in luxurious lines of the Camry, the Highlander SUV, and the Lexus RX series, as well as the economical Prius model. GM has yet to enter the hybrid field in a serious way.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/general-motors-vs-toyota-battle-of-the-brands/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Motors vs. Toyota: Battle of the Brands</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/general-motors-vs-toyota-battle-of-the-brands/">General Motors vs. Toyota: Battle of the Brands</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/general-motors-vs-toyota-battle-of-the-brands/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/861457/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/general-motors-vs-toyota-battle-of-the-brands/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto makers</category><category>Battle of the Brands</category><category>BattleOfTheBrands</category><category>Camry</category><category>customer loyalty</category><category>CustomerLoyalty</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>Georges Yared</category><category>GeorgesYared</category><category>GM</category><category>Highlander</category><category>hybrids</category><category>Lexus</category><category>SUVs</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><category>Yared Investment Research</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
