Cancer posts
FeedPosted Dec 21st 2009 5:00PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Stocks to Buy

Celgene Corp.'s (
CELG) stock has encountered resistance at $58, but I'm nevertheless reiterating my buy rating for the company's shares, first recommended
on June 19, 2009, at a price of $46.94. Here's why:
Look for Celgene's FY2010 revenue to increase 20-23%, on top of a likely a 15-20% rise in FY2009, boosted by cancer treatments Revlimid's and Vidaza's sales. Further, pipeline candidates to treat psoriasis and small cell lung cancer are approaching late-stage study.
Continue reading Celgene Remains in an Uptrend
Posted Sep 15th 2009 10:40AM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad News, Industry, Marketing and Advertising
Pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly & Co. (NYSE: LLY) is planning to cut 5,500 jobs over the next few years and reorganize into five business units. The company is looking to reduce costs and accelerate how long it takes new drugs to get to market, especially as its top performers see their patents expire. This translates to a workforce reduction of close to 14% – to 35,000. This measure doesn't include new positions in emerging markets with high potential and Japan.
The company hopes to cut as much as possible through attrition and retirements – and it would not indicate how many other positions would have to be cut.
Eli Lilly's goal is to slash its annual cost by $1 billion during this restructuring. The new business units will be: cancer, diabetes, established markets, emerging markets and Elanco, which is its animal health business. This is a change from the existing functional model, which separates U.S. and global marketing for each drug in the company's portfolio. Through the new structure, Lilly says, drug development and marketing will be tied more closely.
Continue reading Eli Lilly to restructure, bet on drug portfolio
Posted Jul 1st 2009 10:30AM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad News, Pfizer (PFE)
Late yesterday, Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) announced the discontinuation of the SUN 1122 Phase III trial of Sutent. The drug is for treating colorectal cancer, and the study was terminated because it failed to achieve its primary end point in the study. An independent committee (the Data Monitoring Committee) found that adding sunitinib to the chemotherapy regimen FOLFIRI would be unable to demonstrate "a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival compared to FOLFIRI alone."
The company's vice president of Clinical Development and Medical Affairs Dr. Mace Rothenberg noted, "We are disappointed with this result, but trial successes and failures are an integral part of cancer drug development and contribute to a growing body of knowledge on improving patient care."
Continue reading Pfizer discontinues Phase III drug trial; stock continues to drag
Posted Sep 10th 2008 2:40PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, Apple Inc (AAPL)

Back in June, pancreatic cancer survivor and
Apple (NASDAQ:
AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs appeared at a conference appearing excessively thin and out of it, spurring rumors that Jobs was sick, possibly with another occurrence of cancer.
Joe Nocera
reports that Jobs is now blaming the rumors on "hedge funds with a big short position in Apple."
Color me unconvinced. When a high-profile cancer survivor appears gaunt and sickly, there is no need for a nefarious conspiracy to spur questions about his health. Nocera has an interesting theory: "I think he likes having half the world wondering about his health. I think he likes the fact that Bloomberg accidentally put his obituary on the Web. It's a lovely reminder about just how important he is in the culture. It means half the world is spending time thinking about, well, him. Far more than anyone in hedge fund land, he himself was most responsible for the rumors, by acting so absurdly secretive. His narcissism isn't pretty, but it sure is effective."
Continue reading Steve Jobs blames cancer rumors on hedge funds!
Posted May 19th 2008 3:10PM by Melly Alazraki (RSS feed)
Filed under: Pfizer (PFE), Novartis AG ADS (NVS), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY), Merck and Co (MRK), Genentech Inc (DNA), Amgen Inc (AMGN), Lilly (Eli) (LLY), ImClone Systems (IMCL)

Almost everyone these days has encountered cancer in one way or another. While the
rate of cancer incidence has stabilized to declined since the early 1990s and, with newer and better treatments as well as early detection, cancer death rates have also declined, the war on cancer is still far from won.
It is no surprise, then, that a few days ago,
IMS Health (NYSE:
RX) -- a provider of market intelligence to the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries -- said that
cancer drugs sales will nearly double by the year 2012. Assuming a compound growth rate of 12-15% a year, sales will grow from $48 billion in 2008 to $80 billion by 2012.
The main contributors to growth, according to the study, are an increasing number of patients on chemotherapy, not just in major markets but in emerging markets, too, as well as longer treatment periods for growing numbers of patients. Also fueling growth are the increased use of targeted therapeutic agents, along with first-time innovations coming to the market. Expensive new biotechnology drugs, and the increasing use of combination therapies that contribute to the exploding cost of treatment will also fuel cancer drugs sales growth.
The overall pharmaceutical market grew at a 6.4% pace in 2007, meaning that with its double-digit growth rate, the cancer drug market -- today contributing 17% to global pharmaceutical sales -- will only represent a greater proportion and emphasis. Of course, there will be factors moderating growth, such as drugs losing exclusivity and financial constraints of payers.
Cancer-fighting drugs can reach the market twice as fast as the average medicine, and companies can charge as much as $50,000 for a single course of treatment. It is no surprise then that with more and more drugs coming off patent many pharma companies are turning their attention to cancer. But can it save them?
Continue reading Can cancer drugs help pharma sales?
Next Page >