<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Oregon newspaper claims JP Morgan Chase memo of dubious intent]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/29/oregon-newspaper-claims-jp-morgan-chase-memo-of-dubious-intent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/29/oregon-newspaper-claims-jp-morgan-chase-memo-of-dubious-intent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/29/oregon-newspaper-claims-jp-morgan-chase-memo-of-dubious-intent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img alt="want ads" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" width="240" align="right" />Jeff Manning, staff writer for <em>The Oregonian</em> newspaper, released a story Thursday, March 27, 2008, that claims the paper has come into possession of a copy of an internal memo from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>). According to <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/business/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/business/120658650589950.xml&amp;coll=7"><em>The Oregonian</em> article</a>, which hints at unsavory or even fraudulent mortgage processing practices, the memo indicates that loan processors can (not should) use creative data entry to alter automated underwriting system results. <em>The Oregonian</em> writer entertains the "dark side" scenario in the tone of his article.That's a real convenient, time-tested ploy for selling newspapers. Kudos for his attempt.</p>
<p>However, representatives for Chase mortgage operations have dismissed the memo as nothing more than a strategic angle on automated process. While no one has actually come out to say they created the memo or why, the company allegedly admits that the document is genuine. I get no sense that anyone from the company who commented on the situation has anything to hide. In fact, company reps appear to be quite forthcoming on the matter.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/29/oregon-newspaper-claims-jp-morgan-chase-memo-of-dubious-intent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oregon newspaper claims JP Morgan Chase memo of dubious intent</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/29/oregon-newspaper-claims-jp-morgan-chase-memo-of-dubious-intent/">Oregon newspaper claims JP Morgan Chase memo of dubious intent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.oregonlive.com/business/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/business/120658650589950.xml&amp;coll=7>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/29/oregon-newspaper-claims-jp-morgan-chase-memo-of-dubious-intent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1152402/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/29/oregon-newspaper-claims-jp-morgan-chase-memo-of-dubious-intent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chase</category><category>featured</category><category>Jeff Manning</category><category>JP Morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>memo</category><category>The Oregonian</category><category>underwriting</category><category>Zippy</category><category>Zippy Cheats</category><category>Zippy Tricks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Oprah Winfrey " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />At a mere $276 million, celebrity talk-show host and entertainment billionaire Oprah Winfrey could afford to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>), which closed Tuesday at $5.91 per share and keeps on climbing to over $6.50 a share in morning trading. The story alone and the associated publicity would be worth at least that. Furthermore, she could at least make an offer and demand a meeting with the Federal Reserve Board to discuss the issue.</p>
<p>If her offer was rejected, she would still be able to generate millions of dollars of publicity and perhaps she might want to acquire the asset, in particular if the Fed is going to protect the acquirer from potential losses. She could really become an international mogul, the likes of which has not been seen. We all know that Oprah wants to do good. She is so giving, this could be the ultimate.</p>
<p>I could just see the headlines: <em>Oprah Winfrey takes on </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JP Morgan Chase</em></a><em> (NYSE: </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JPM</em></a><em>) and the Federal Reserve to rescue John Q. Public.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/">Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/03192008/business/bear_hunting_102536.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>chase</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>Jimmy Cayne</category><category>JimmyCayne</category><category>Joseph Lewis</category><category>JosephLewis</category><category>jp morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>Michael Jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah's big give</category><category>Oprah'sBigGive</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>Skywalker Ranch</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Bear Stearns questions and curiosities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/serious-money-bear-stearns-questions-and-curiosities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/serious-money-bear-stearns-questions-and-curiosities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/serious-money-bear-stearns-questions-and-curiosities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/question-mark01.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><!-- The Bear Sterns discussion points are blazing a trail throughout the financial world and will provide lengthy course material at business schools for years to come.</p--> For me, I just find it unfathomable that management would either bet the farm on some very high risk investments, or equally bad, bet the farm on investments they did not fully comprehend. This is such an extreme case of mismanagement that investors the world over can not believe it was possible. As a matter of fact it seems so impossible that it is probably what kept many of us faithfully invested. Many of us take investment risks, some more than others, but to bet the whole farm? To bet your future existence? This is financial insanity.
<p>Is this just a case of greed causing blindness? If so why was it so contagious among some firms and not others?</p>
<p>It seems to me that the reported $2 per share purchase price that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">JP Morgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">JPM</a>) is paying for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) would not have been enough to buy the brand name last year, never mind the whole company. What we are witnessing is the strong (until JPM reports some surprise) taking advantage of the weak. It also exemplifies how bad the market is, that no other buyer has stepped in at these fire sale prices.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/serious-money-bear-stearns-questions-and-curiosities/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Bear Stearns questions and curiosities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/serious-money-bear-stearns-questions-and-curiosities/">Serious Money: Bear Stearns questions and curiosities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/serious-money-bear-stearns-questions-and-curiosities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1142222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/17/serious-money-bear-stearns-questions-and-curiosities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>Chase</category><category>Corporate management</category><category>CorporateManagement</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jp morgan</category><category>JP Morgan Chase</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>JpMorganChase</category><category>Liber</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: SLM Corp (SLM) volatility spikes as deal won't be completed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/option-update-9-26-07-slm-corp-slm-volatility-aggressively-sp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/option-update-9-26-07-slm-corp-slm-volatility-aggressively-sp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/option-update-9-26-07-slm-corp-slm-volatility-aggressively-sp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/slm/" rel="tag">SLM Corp (SLM)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/slm-corporation/slm/nys"><strong><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" align="right" /></strong><strong>SLM Corporation</strong></a><strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/slm-corporation/slm/nys">SLM</a>), a leading provider of saving and paying for college programs, is recently down $1.91 to $44.36.</strong> </p>
<p>SLM says that the J.C. Flowers, Bank of America Corporation (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>), and JPMorgan Chase &amp; Company (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) buyers group does not expect to consummate the acquisition of SLM. SLM call option volume of 98,356 contracts compares to put volume of 68,654 contracts. SLM October option implied volatility was at 91 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movements.<br /><br /><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/option-update-9-26-07-slm-corp-slm-volatility-aggressively-sp/">Option update: SLM Corp (SLM) volatility spikes as deal won't be completed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/option-update-9-26-07-slm-corp-slm-volatility-aggressively-sp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/999073/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/option-update-9-26-07-slm-corp-slm-volatility-aggressively-sp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>chase</category><category>college loans</category><category>CollegeLoans</category><category>home loans</category><category>HomeLoans</category><category>J.C. Flowers</category><category>loans</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
