<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Chicago Bridge's Stock Headed to $40 and Beyond?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-chicago-bridges-stock-headed-to-40-and-beyond/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-chicago-bridges-stock-headed-to-40-and-beyond/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-chicago-bridges-stock-headed-to-40-and-beyond/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" style="width: 242px; height: 162px;" alt="Chicago Bridge (CBI) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/02/chicago-bridge-iron.jpg" />Steady as she goes with Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys">CBI</a>), which I first wrote about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/chicago-bridge-and-iron-a-get-ahead-of-the-pack-play/">on April 6, 2009</a>, at a price of $7.31, which has pushed through psychological resistance at $30. <br />
<br />
Further, obviously if you're in near $7.31 or at a dollar-cost-average below $14, now may be a good time to consider taking some profits off the table with CBI. <br />
<br />
However, those investors who can tolerate the risk can hold on to their full position in CBI go for a possible larger gain. I'd also raise the sell/stop loss to $22 from $18 at this stage.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-chicago-bridges-stock-headed-to-40-and-beyond/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Chicago Bridge's Stock Headed to $40 and Beyond?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-chicago-bridges-stock-headed-to-40-and-beyond/">Is Chicago Bridge's Stock Headed to $40 and Beyond?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-chicago-bridges-stock-headed-to-40-and-beyond/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19831700/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-chicago-bridges-stock-headed-to-40-and-beyond/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBI</category><category>Chicago Bridge and Iron</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron Expects an Even Better 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/12/chicago-bridge-and-iron-expects-an-even-better-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/12/chicago-bridge-and-iron-expects-an-even-better-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/12/chicago-bridge-and-iron-expects-an-even-better-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron (CBI) logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/chicago-bridge-iron.jpg" />If you took the opportunity to scoop-up more shares of Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys">CBI</a>), which I first wrote about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/chicago-bridge-and-iron-a-get-ahead-of-the-pack-play/">on April 6, 2009</a>, at a price of $7.31, during its summer dip to <a href="http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Symbol=CBI">about $16</a>, you made the correct move, as CBI has reaccelerated, <a href="http:// http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/chicago-bridge-and-iron-low-profile-gem/#continued">as forecast</a>, and is now testing $30.</p>
<p>In fact, if you're in at $7.31 or at a dollar-cost-average below $14, if you haven't already, now may be a good time to consider taking some profits off the table with CBI. However, those who can tolerate the risk can hold on to their full position to go for a possible larger gain.</p>
<p>I'd also raise the sell/stop loss to $18 from $14.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/12/chicago-bridge-and-iron-expects-an-even-better-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron Expects an Even Better 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/12/chicago-bridge-and-iron-expects-an-even-better-2011/">Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron Expects an Even Better 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/12/chicago-bridge-and-iron-expects-an-even-better-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19714644/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/12/chicago-bridge-and-iron-expects-an-even-better-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBI</category><category>Chicago Bridge and Iron</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron: Low-Profile Gem]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/chicago-bridge-and-iron-low-profile-gem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/chicago-bridge-and-iron-low-profile-gem/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/chicago-bridge-and-iron-low-profile-gem/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/cbi_logo.jpg" />The shares of Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys">CBI</a>), which I first wrote about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/chicago-bridge-and-iron-a-get-ahead-of-the-pack-play/">on April 6, 2009 </a>at a price of $7.31, pulled-back as expected this spring, on a projected roughly 10% revenue decline in 2010, but just look on that stock retreat as an opportunity to scoop up shares of a premiere company. <br />
<br />
Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron specializes in projects that produce, process, store, and distribute the world's natural resources. Liquid natural gas and refining project revenue will likely decline in 2010, offset somewhat by Canadian oil sands and shale gas/unconventional gas project revenue.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/chicago-bridge-and-iron-low-profile-gem/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron: Low-Profile Gem</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/chicago-bridge-and-iron-low-profile-gem/">Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron: Low-Profile Gem</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/chicago-bridge-and-iron-low-profile-gem/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19566420/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/chicago-bridge-and-iron-low-profile-gem/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBI</category><category>Chicago Bridge and Iron</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron: Back up the truck]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/chicago-bridge-and-iron-back-up-the-truck/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/chicago-bridge-and-iron-back-up-the-truck/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/chicago-bridge-and-iron-back-up-the-truck/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>In April, the call was that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys">Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys">CBI</a>) was undervalued at $7.31. If you bought CBI in April, you're up 178%. Not bad.<br /><br />Moreover, it goes without saying that I'm reiterating my Buy rating for CBI, first recommended <a href="http:// http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/chicago-bridge-is-undervalued/#continued">on April 6, 2009</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/chicago-bridge-and-iron-back-up-the-truck/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron: Back up the truck</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/chicago-bridge-and-iron-back-up-the-truck/">Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron: Back up the truck</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/chicago-bridge-and-iron-back-up-the-truck/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/chicago-bridge-and-iron-back-up-the-truck/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Canadian oil sands</category><category>CanadianOilSands</category><category>CBI</category><category>Chicago Bridge and Iron</category><category>middle east</category><category>MiddleEast</category><category>oil sands</category><category>OilSands</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chicago Bridge is undervalued]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/chicago-bridge-is-undervalued/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/chicago-bridge-is-undervalued/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/chicago-bridge-is-undervalued/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/cbi_logo.jpg" />I'm reiterating my Buy rating for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-company-n-v/cbi/nys">Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-company-n-v/cbi/nys">CBI</a>), first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/chicago-bridge-and-iron-a-get-ahead-of-the-pack-play/">on April 6, 2009</a> at a price of $7.31.</p>
<p>Did you have a chance to get in on CBI in April? If you did, you're up more than 90%. But the good run is hardly over.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/chicago-bridge-is-undervalued/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chicago Bridge is undervalued</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/chicago-bridge-is-undervalued/">Chicago Bridge is undervalued</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/chicago-bridge-is-undervalued/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19121787/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/chicago-bridge-is-undervalued/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBI</category><category>Chicago Bridge and Iron</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option Update: Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron volatility elevated into lower guidance &amp; charge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/option-update-chicago-bridge-and-iron-volatility-elevated-into-lo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/option-update-chicago-bridge-and-iron-volatility-elevated-into-lo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/option-update-chicago-bridge-and-iron-volatility-elevated-into-lo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /><strong>Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys">CBI</a>), was trading at $31.39 in after market trading last night, below its close of $36.39 Tuesday. <br /></p>
<p>CBI lowered guidance for 2008 and will take a Q2 pretax charge of $317 million on cost over runs associated with two LNG projects in the UK. Goldman Sachs says: "Lowering rating to Neutral on nagging execution risk." <br /></p>
<p>CBI August option implied volatility of 66 is above its 26-week average of 53 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase"><strong>Financial Select Sector-</strong>XLF</a> overall volatility at 51; 26-week average is 36</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/option-update-chicago-bridge-and-iron-volatility-elevated-into-lo/">Option Update: Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron volatility elevated into lower guidance &amp; charge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/option-update-chicago-bridge-and-iron-volatility-elevated-into-lo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1257583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/option-update-chicago-bridge-and-iron-volatility-elevated-into-lo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbi</category><category>chicago bridge and iron</category><category>ChicagoBridgeAndIron</category><category>Financial Select Sector-XLF</category><category>FinancialSelectSector-xlf</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Fluor shows the power of execution ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-fluor-shows-the-power-of-execution/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-fluor-shows-the-power-of-execution/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-fluor-shows-the-power-of-execution/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eds/" rel="tag">Electronic Data Systems (EDS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says this report highlighted where the success lies in this market: energy and petroleum.</span><br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fluor-corporation/flr/nys">      Fluor</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fluor-corporation/flr/nys">FLR</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=FLR" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) a monster. It shows you that what has hurt the other companies, particularly <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys">Chicago Bridge &amp; Iron</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chicago-bridge-and-iron-co-n-v-netherlands/cbi/nys">CBI</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=CBI" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), is pure execution. <br /><br />  This gigantic beat also serves to remind us of the big dichotomy. You are either in the energy and petroleum products game or you are in a lot of games that don't work. <br /><br />  It's not easy for these companies, some of which have lived off the duress of state and local governments, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-shaw-group-inc/sgr/nys">Shaw</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-shaw-group-inc/sgr/nys">SGR</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=SGR" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) and to a certain extent <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aecom-technology-corp-delawa/acm/nys">Aecom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aecom-technology-corp-delawa/acm/nys">ACM</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=ACM" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/urs-corporation/urs/nys">URS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/urs-corporation/urs/nys">URS</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=URS" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), to become oil-and-gas plays. <br /><br />  The only ones that have transcended it beside Fluor are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/foster-wheeler-ltd/fwlt/nas">Foster Wheeler</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/foster-wheeler-ltd/fwlt/nas">FWLT</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=FWLT" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jacobs-engineering-group-inc-united-states/jec/nys">Jacobs Engineering</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jacobs-engineering-group-inc-united-states/jec/nys">JEC</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=JEC" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), and the only reason you would really know that is longevity. I remember in the early 1980s when FLR and then FWC would compete directly for all of the huge projects after the second oil shock. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-fluor-shows-the-power-of-execution/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Fluor shows the power of execution </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-fluor-shows-the-power-of-execution/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Fluor shows the power of execution </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 May 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-fluor-shows-the-power-of-execution/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1193938/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-fluor-shows-the-power-of-execution/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acm</category><category>aecom</category><category>cbi</category><category>chicago bridge and iron</category><category>ChicagoBridgeAndIron</category><category>eds</category><category>featured</category><category>flr</category><category>fluor</category><category>foster wheeler</category><category>FosterWheeler</category><category>fwlt</category><category>hpq</category><category>ibm</category><category>jacobs engineering</category><category>JacobsEngineering</category><category>jec</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mcdermott</category><category>mdr</category><category>sgr</category><category>shaw</category><category>urs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
