<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[New studio's business plan should be a lesson to media conglomerates]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-studios-business-plan-should-be-a-lesson-to-media-conglomer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-studios-business-plan-should-be-a-lesson-to-media-conglomer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-studios-business-plan-should-be-a-lesson-to-media-conglomer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/boxoffice.jpg" /> I caught a very interesting post by Julia Boorstin over at <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/31384643/site/14081545?__source=aol|headline|quote|text|&amp;par=aol">CNBC.com</a>. She discusses a movie studio that apparently wants to change the way movies are made. The company is called DF Indie Studios. Here's what it wants to do: make a dozen or so films each year on the cheap. What is cheap in Hollywood? Try $10 million or less. DF Indie Studios wants to go it alone, which means that it would rather not hook up with a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) or a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) to get distribution for its product. And Boorstin mentions that equity will be used as financing.
<p> </p>
<p>This movie-making model is right up my alley. I've written extensively about how Tinsel Town has gotten out of control when it comes to budgets and marketing expenses. Movies simply don't need to cost as much as they do. And projects give away way too many concessions in terms of cash-flow participation. Big stars tend to receive percentages of the gross that are too significant, in my opinion. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-studios-business-plan-should-be-a-lesson-to-media-conglomer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New studio's business plan should be a lesson to media conglomerates</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-studios-business-plan-should-be-a-lesson-to-media-conglomer/">New studio's business plan should be a lesson to media conglomerates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/31384643/site/14081545?__source=aol|headline|quote|text|&amp;par=aol>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/16/are-studios-going-to-start-consolidating/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-studios-business-plan-should-be-a-lesson-to-media-conglomer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19068940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-studios-business-plan-should-be-a-lesson-to-media-conglomer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>df indie studios</category><category>DfIndieStudios</category><category>Disney</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>julia boorstin</category><category>JuliaBoorstin</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>Paramount</category><category>Sony</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off: Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trmp/" rel="tag">Trump Entertainment Resorts (TRMP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hlt/" rel="tag">Hilton Hotels (HLT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars">Money Face-Offs</a></strong> feature. Let us know who you think comes out ahead in this head-to-head match-up, and check out our other Money Face-Off posts.</em></p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/face-off-240-heiresses-cs091207.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />How does one go about drawing a comparison between <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Hilton">Paris Hilton</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump">Ivanka Trump</a>? In my estimation, although there a some mildly reasonable parallels between the two ladies, they are two significantly different people. It's difficult in this format to strip the comparison down to bare facts and then to build a picture of each woman's character and experience from there. So, what I shall try to do is give you just the basics to help you and then I'll leave you to determine which of these women you'd prefer to spend some time with. I'd be pleased if you would comment about which woman you would choose as a business associate, an employee, a national leader, or a life partner.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off: Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/">Money Face-Off: Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/980207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barron Hilton</category><category>cinematical</category><category>Conrad Hilton</category><category>divas</category><category>Donald Trump</category><category>DonaldTrump</category><category>expire-images:2008-9-14</category><category>FHM</category><category>heiress</category><category>Ivanka Trump</category><category>modeling</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>real estate development</category><category>Trump</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Remember 'Akeelah and the Bee'? -- neither do I]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/remember-akeelah-and-the-bee-neither-do-i/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/remember-akeelah-and-the-bee-neither-do-i/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/remember-akeelah-and-the-bee-neither-do-i/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" akeelah="" and="" the="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/07_72dpi.jpg" alt="Laurence Fishburne in " id="vimage_1" />Lionsgate Films and Starbucks (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=USA&amp;pid=&amp;tabs=quotesandnews&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=" title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance">SBUX</a>) partnered this past Spring to promote one of the (seemingly endless number of) spelling-bee-themed rockyesque films recently in production, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0437800/" title="Akeelah and the Bee (2006)">Akeelah and the Bee</a>. (Read: <a href="http://www.videobusiness.com/article/CA6347662.html" title="Video Business Online - 6/26/2006 - Lionsgate and Starbucks get educated - CA6347662">Video Business Online: Lionsgate and Starbucks get educated.</a>) Starbucks has had good cross-promotion success in the past, notably with music CD's (not only with repackages of well-known artists like Ray Charles, but also, promoting niche acts like <a href="http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&amp;c=Article&amp;cid=1152049812134&amp;call_pageid=968867495754&amp;col=969483191630" title="TheStar.com - A star is born, via Starbucks">Sonya Kitchell</a>) but this maiden attempt to tie-in with a film fizzled. The film has <a href="http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2006/AKELA.php" title="Akeelah and the Bee - Box Office Data, Movie News, Cast Information - The Numbers">grossed just around $18.5 million</a> through last weekend-- some 70+ days since opening. I myself never caught spelling-bee fever from the promotional sleeves featuring obscure words and definitions that came with my cups of joe during the promotion. Evidently others felt <a href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/_/2006/04/im_so_sick_of_t.html" title="Starbucks Gossip: I'm so sick of the ">much more than indifference</a>.<br /><br />The movie studio, naturally, prefers to show the experience in a positive light. <span class="copy"></span></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/remember-akeelah-and-the-bee-neither-do-i/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Remember 'Akeelah and the Bee'? -- neither do I</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/remember-akeelah-and-the-bee-neither-do-i/">Remember 'Akeelah and the Bee'? -- neither do I</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/remember-akeelah-and-the-bee-neither-do-i/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/639575/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/remember-akeelah-and-the-bee-neither-do-i/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Akeelah and the Bee</category><category>AkeelahAndTheBee</category><category>cinematical</category><category>Lionsgate</category><category>marketing</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Superman returns super-positive receipts for Imax]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/superman-returns-super-positive-receipts-for-imax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/superman-returns-super-positive-receipts-for-imax/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/superman-returns-super-positive-receipts-for-imax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img id="vimage_2" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/05305001.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Regardless of how Time Warner's (<a title="TWX: Time Warner Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=twx&amp;exch=USA&amp;pid=&amp;tabs=quotesandnews&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=">TWX</a>) movie division fairs overall this summer, The Man of Steel has been a boon for Imax (<a title="IMAX: Imax Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=imax&amp;exch=USA&amp;pid=&amp;tabs=quotesandnews&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=">IMAX</a>). Choose your metaphor: "Superman Returns" either soared with, flew away with, or as Sandy Brown of TheStreet.com says, "<a title="Superman Lifts Imax" href="http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/stocks/media/10295337.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA">lifted" Imax this week</a> when the movie took in $6.83 million during its first seven days as an "Imax 3D Experience." This special 3D-enhanced version of the film is currently showing on over 70 Imax screens in the US.<br /><br />In recent summers movie-goers have shown themselves to be more the up to the challenge of craning their necks for recent Hollywood blockbusters such as "Batman Begins" and whatever they called the last Matrix movie, as opposed to just the forty-five minute glacier, coral reef, or mountain adventure odysseys that still dominate the big big big screen.<br /><br />&nbsp;A little 3D Imax buzz can only help Time Warner, which has seen the decent revenue taken in by this lynchpin film in its summer schedule overshadowed amidst repeated reminders in the media that, yes, other superhero movies have opened stronger -- and that is without even mentioning the decidedly mixed reception the movie got from critics.<br /><br /><em>[Disclosure: I have seen "Superman Returns" once, on the regular-sized big screen, liked it, and will probably see it again.]</em><br /><br />(You can read more about <a title="Superman Broke a Box Office Record - Cinematical" href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/07/06/superman-broke-a-box-office-record/">Superman breaking a box office record</a> from Christopher Campbell at Cinematical).<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/superman-returns-super-positive-receipts-for-imax/">Superman returns super-positive receipts for Imax</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://cinematical/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/superman-returns-super-positive-receipts-for-imax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/640376/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/superman-returns-super-positive-receipts-for-imax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3D</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>dc comics</category><category>DcComics</category><category>imax</category><category>summer box office</category><category>SummerBoxOffice</category><category>Superman</category><category>Superman 3D</category><category>Superman IMAX</category><category>superman returns</category><category>Superman3d</category><category>SupermanImax</category><category>SupermanReturns</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>warner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Superman is not coming to save the day for Time Warner']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/30/superman-is-not-coming-to-save-the-day-for-time-warner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/30/superman-is-not-coming-to-save-the-day-for-time-warner/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/30/superman-is-not-coming-to-save-the-day-for-time-warner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/superman_returns_cw.jpg" alt="" id="vimage_1" />... so said Richard Steinberg (Steinberg Global Asset Management) in a Reuters <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=industryNews&amp;storyID=2006-06-26T233653Z_01_N26380003_RTRIDST_0_INDUSTRY-MEDIA-TIMEWARNER-SUPERMAN-DC.XML" title="Superman returns: Will Time Warner investors??|?Reuters.com">story</a> that reports TWX shares increased more than one percent last Monday. Advanced screenings of "Superman Returns" got positive reactions from investors and some movie critics. Now, after the film's Wednesday opening <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2104&amp;p=.htm" title="Box Office Mojo &gt; News &gt; 'Superman' Solid on Opening Day">Box Office Mojo</a> is calling the opening gross solid, while&nbsp; <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/06/29/superman-opens-with-a-respectable-21-million/" title="Superman Opens With a Respectable $21 Million - Cinematical">Cinematical</a> and others call the take "respectable." Seems to be some disappointment that Superman, with 21 million on Wednesday underperformed compared with Sony's two Spider-Man flicks -- both of which had <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/days/?page=open&amp;p.htm" title="Box Office Mojo &gt; All Time Box Office &gt; Single Day Records">Opening day grosses</a> around the 40 million mark. <br /><br />The Reuters piece goes on to say that Time Warner may need more than one good showing by one blockbuster this summer to balance out the spring-time disaster that was "Poseidon." The coming weeks will show whether word-of-mouth will drive more eyes toward the Man in Tights or send them away. Long-term success or failure will depend on whether the inevitable two sequels will hold onto enough box office to make the revived movie franchise a solid investment for the studio division.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/30/superman-is-not-coming-to-save-the-day-for-time-warner/">'Superman is not coming to save the day for Time Warner'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/30/superman-is-not-coming-to-save-the-day-for-time-warner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/638634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/30/superman-is-not-coming-to-save-the-day-for-time-warner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Box Office</category><category>Box Office Record</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>BoxOfficeRecord</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Movie Grosses</category><category>MovieGrosses</category><category>Superman Returns</category><category>SupermanReturns</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
