<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="175" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/coffee_stock.jpg" alt="" />Bundling is beautiful for newspapers. Since April 1, 2009, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34094479/ns/business-media_biz/">new rules for counting circulation have turned some newspapers from losing to gaining</a>, even in a market where the print community is getting thrashed. Instead of selling more copies every day, these publications are counting online visits, as long as they are from paying subscribers - for either protected portions of the website or digital replica editions.</p>
<p>The new auditing standards, which affect <em>USA Today</em>, a Gannet (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) property, and News Corp's (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, among others, often allow newspapers that bundle print and digital editions to count the subscriber twice. According to a report by the Associated Press, the new rule is preventing circulation from looking as bad as it really may be.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/">Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34094479/ns/business-media_biz/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19249895/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>audit bureau of circulations</category><category>circulation</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>newspaper circulation</category><category>Newspaper circulation declines</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperCirculation</category><category>NewspaperCirculationDeclines</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>NWS</category><category>subscriptions</category><category>usa today</category><category>UsaToday</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Iconix sets its sights on Playboy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" />It's wabbit season!</p>
<p>There's only good news for Playboy (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) when someone expresses an interest in buying it. Shares of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33894271/ns/business-media_biz/">ailing men's lifestyle company</a> shot higher on Thursday when word got out that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33894271/ns/business-media_biz/">Iconix is interested in acquiring it</a>. Iconix owns and licenses brands to manufacturers and counts Candie's and London Fog among its holdings. A deal isn't a sure thing, but Playboy now has something it hasn't in a while: hope.</p>
<p>Iconix has been looking to acquire more brands. And Playboy has been looking for a knight in shining armor (and with a hefty war chest in tow) since at least June, when Scott Flanders took the helm. But it looked like acquisition bait well before then, thanks to a rough financial situation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Iconix sets its sights on Playboy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/">Iconix sets its sights on Playboy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236272/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>circulation</category><category>club jenna</category><category>ClubJenna</category><category>featured</category><category>hugh hefner</category><category>HughHefner</category><category>iconix</category><category>jenna jameson</category><category>JennaJameson</category><category>magazine</category><category>media</category><category>pla</category><category>playboy</category><category>porn</category><category>pornography</category><category>print</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspapers' plan to curb decline? Mess with the math!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/newspapers-plan-to-curb-decline-mess-with-the-math/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/newspapers-plan-to-curb-decline-mess-with-the-math/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/newspapers-plan-to-curb-decline-mess-with-the-math/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/teapaper.jpg" alt="Newspaper" />You have to stand in awe of the print media's desperation to reverse its decline. Having realized that newspaper circulation is destined to decline indefinitely, they've found a new way to report growth: Change the way you report your numbers! <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119427904477182611.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">According</a> (subscription required) to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>:<br /><em><br />Circulation at the nation's biggest newspapers slid again in the latest six-month period, by an average of 2.6%, a sign of continuing defection of readers and advertisers to the Internet.</em>
<p class="times"><em>But in an attempt to draw attention away from the sagging circulation data, the industry is trying to highlight a new measure: the total number of online and print newspaper readers instead of simply the number of print papers delivered everyday.</em></p>
But the advertising industry isn't buying it: <em>"This is helpful information, but we can't just rely on readership and audience," said Merle Davidson, director of Media Services at J.C. Penney Co. "Print circulation is still very important."<br /><br /></em>Of course it is. That's because newspapers that trumpet their online readership are competing in a whole different space -- against websites, including BloggingStocks.<br /><br />The industry has essentially changed its "accounting" to try to portray the state of the business in a different light. If this sounds like what some of the great accounting frauds did, that's because it is.<br /><br />Of course, this isn't fraud, because everything is disclosed. It's just desperation.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/newspapers-plan-to-curb-decline-mess-with-the-math/">Newspapers' plan to curb decline? Mess with the math!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/newspapers-plan-to-curb-decline-mess-with-the-math/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1031344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/newspapers-plan-to-curb-decline-mess-with-the-math/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accounting</category><category>advertising</category><category>circulation</category><category>internet</category><category>Newspapers</category><category>print media</category><category>PrintMedia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
