<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Time to Sell E*Trade?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/27/chasing-value-time-to-sell-e-trade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/27/chasing-value-time-to-sell-e-trade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/27/chasing-value-time-to-sell-e-trade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/schw/" rel="tag">Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/etrade-logo.jpg" alt="E*Trade (ETFC) logo" />Two weeks ago I decided to sell my shares of E*Trade (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) after concluding it did not fit my investment criteria. It was one of my successful <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/04/chasing-value-2010-final-review-winners-and-losers/">picks for 2010</a> and I made money having sold puts establishing a base price of $13.50. It closed Friday February 25 at $15.89.</p>
<p>I might not have chosen to post about this except for news that Ken Griffin's hedge fund Citadel Investment Group plans to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-24/citadel-selling-up-to-27-5m-e-trade-shares.html">sell much of its stake in E*Trade Financial</a>. The largest shareholder selling out is news. Citadel will still hold valuable warrants, giving it the option of taking a very large position again, but for now there seems to be a change of heart for them as well.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/27/chasing-value-time-to-sell-e-trade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Time to Sell E*Trade?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/27/chasing-value-time-to-sell-e-trade/">Chasing Value: Time to Sell E*Trade?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/27/chasing-value-time-to-sell-e-trade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19860520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/27/chasing-value-time-to-sell-e-trade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMTD</category><category>cash flow management</category><category>Charles Schwab</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>citadel</category><category>Citadel Investment Group</category><category>Citadel sells E-Trade</category><category>E-Trade buyout</category><category>E-Trade takeover</category><category>etfc</category><category>ETrade</category><category>featured</category><category>Ken Griffin</category><category>pricing power</category><category>ROIC</category><category>SCHW</category><category>Stocks to Sell</category><category>TD Ameritrade</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS takes WBCN to web -- a wise move?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/cbs-takes-wbcn-to-web-a-wise-move/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/cbs-takes-wbcn-to-web-a-wise-move/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/cbs-takes-wbcn-to-web-a-wise-move/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/boom-box.jpg" />Citizens of Boston, you heard some awful news this week. According to <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2009/07/final_chord_for.html">reports</a>, rock institution WBCN 104.1 FM will no longer be filling the airwaves with its iconic brand of irreverent broadcasting. Instead, it will live on as a web domain. In its place will be WBMX, a station that was formerly at 98.5 in the FM universe. An all-sports format will take up WBMX's old home. Who can you thank for this? Send all complaints to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), the station's owner.
<p>Actually, before you compose a bunch of angry missives, please consider the state of terrestrial radio. Quite frankly, CBS doesn't have a choice. Between the lousy growth prospects for the medium, and the challenged status quo of the advertising market given the terrible global recession that continues to rip through the markets like a hideous beast, changes have to be made. Changes that you thought would never come. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/cbs-takes-wbcn-to-web-a-wise-move/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CBS takes WBCN to web -- a wise move?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/cbs-takes-wbcn-to-web-a-wise-move/">CBS takes WBCN to web -- a wise move?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/08/cbs-sees-sales-decline-and-a-loss-in-q1/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/cbs-beats-expectations-sure-but-the-dividend-has-been-slashed/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2009/07/final_chord_for.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/disney-completes-sale-of-abc-radio/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.cbsradio.com/press_center/releases/pressrelease105715-07-14-2009.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/cbs-takes-wbcn-to-web-a-wise-move/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19098196/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/cbs-takes-wbcn-to-web-a-wise-move/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>104.1</category><category>98.5</category><category>CBS</category><category>charles laquidara</category><category>CharlesLaquidara</category><category>Citadel</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Howard Stern</category><category>HowardStern</category><category>inthenews</category><category>radio</category><category>SIRI</category><category>Sirius XM</category><category>SiriusXm</category><category>WBCN</category><category>WBMX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: When 2009 highs are under-covered (BAC, ETFC, MYL, PFE, QCOM, STAA)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/closing-bell-when-2009-highs-are-under-covered-bac-etfc-myl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/closing-bell-when-2009-highs-are-under-covered-bac-etfc-myl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/closing-bell-when-2009-highs-are-under-covered-bac-etfc-myl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/qcom/" rel="tag">QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />Today marked intra-day 2009 for the S&amp;P 500 and NASDAQ, although these might not have closed on the highs for the year. Also that won't be known until the formal 4:30-ish closing reset adjustment. This came on the heels of slightly <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/06/11/continuing-jobless-claims-approaches-7-million/">less-bad jobs data</a> and on some <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/06/11/a-false-positive-from-retail-sales/">confusing retail</a> gains. Unlike earlier Treasury auctions, today's 30-year Treasury Bond auction was a help to the markets as yields reached a high enough level that investors jumped in. Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	8,770.92 	+31.90 (0.37%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	944.88 	+5.73 (0.61%) <br />Nasdaq 	1,862.37 	+9.29 (0.50%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/06/11/top-analyst-upgrades-car-bac-bcsi-clrt-ihs-ma-plxs-qtww-slb/">Top Analyst Upgrades</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/06/11/top-analyst-downgrades-athn-cnqr-noa-tin-unh-vprt/">Top Analyst Downgrades</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/closing-bell-when-2009-highs-are-under-covered-bac-etfc-myl/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: When 2009 highs are under-covered (BAC, ETFC, MYL, PFE, QCOM, STAA)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/closing-bell-when-2009-highs-are-under-covered-bac-etfc-myl/">Closing Bell: When 2009 highs are under-covered (BAC, ETFC, MYL, PFE, QCOM, STAA)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/closing-bell-when-2009-highs-are-under-covered-bac-etfc-myl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19064800/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/closing-bell-when-2009-highs-are-under-covered-bac-etfc-myl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Citadel</category><category>eye injection</category><category>EyeInjection</category><category>generic drugs</category><category>GenericDrugs</category><category>MYL</category><category>mylan</category><category>STAA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Do we have full transparency in the CDS markets?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/do-we-have-full-transparency-in-the-cds-markets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/do-we-have-full-transparency-in-the-cds-markets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/do-we-have-full-transparency-in-the-cds-markets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>Now at last we will have some transparency in the CDS (credit default swaps) markets. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d885b4ea-9493-11dd-953e-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1">Regulators approved a joint venture between the CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and Citadel</a>, a hedge fund to clear swaps trades that will begin operations within 30 days. The size of this market is mind boggling at 54,000 billion dollars.</p>
<p>One of the underlying factors in our current credit crisis has been the lack of supervision in the CDS markets. Very often it was difficult and nearly impossible to figure out who the players were. You had the original parties to the CDS and then you had speculators who gambled on the credit worthiness of the underlying bond.</p>
<p>While this move to clear CDS trades is a good thing, it does not eliminate the speculation and risk taking by traders in the swaps market. That may never go away but at least it will be easier for trading managers to monitor their trader's actions more closely.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/do-we-have-full-transparency-in-the-cds-markets/">Do we have full transparency in the CDS markets?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d885b4ea-9493-11dd-953e-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/do-we-have-full-transparency-in-the-cds-markets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1413837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/do-we-have-full-transparency-in-the-cds-markets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Citadel</category><category>clearing CDS trades</category><category>ClearingCdsTrades</category><category>CME</category><category>transparency</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citadel crumbles and says "no" to investors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/citadel-crumbles-and-says-no-to-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/citadel-crumbles-and-says-no-to-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/citadel-crumbles-and-says-no-to-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p>The typical structure of a hedge fund can be precarious. For example, there are usually huge amounts of leverage. At the same time, investors can redeem their shares, which often happens in tough times. The upshot: a fund may have to shut down.</p>
<p>Just look at Citadel Investment Group. As of the end of November, the firm's two main funds have <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-fri-citadel-dec12,0,2143184.story">lost close to 50%</a>. What's more, investors are requesting redemptions of $1.2 billion, which comes to 12% of overall assets.</p>
<p>What to do? Well, Citadel isn't going to honor the redemptions -- at least for now.</p>
<p>No doubt, this will anger investors. But, hey, in the hedge fund world, the investors are sophisticated, right? Shouldn't they anticipate such things? Besides, other hedge funds have done the same thing (such as Tudor Investment Corp.)</p>
<p>To allay things, Citadel is making a concession. That is, the firm is going to pay its own operating expenses for 2008 (keep in mind that this usually comes out of investor dollars). And this is no small amount, which could be $200 million to $300 million.</p>
<p>The problem is that -- in light of the huge investment losses -- it will be extremely difficult for Citadel to generate incentive fees. So, in light of this, why will top employees stick around? If anything, they may start their own funds.</p>
<p>In other words, Citadel is in a tough spot right now. And, it could easily take many years for the firm to regain its former stature - if it ever happens.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/tomtaulli"><em>Tom Taulli</em></a><em> is the author of various books, including</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><em><img height="1" width="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0071393943?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0071393943">The Streetsmart Guide to Short Selling: Techniques the Pros Use to Profit in Any Market</a><em><img height="1" width="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0071393943" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />. He is also the founder of </em><a href="http://www.bizequity.com"><em>BizEquity</em></a>, <em>a valuation website.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/citadel-crumbles-and-says-no-to-investors/">Citadel crumbles and says "no" to investors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/citadel-crumbles-and-says-no-to-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1400649/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/citadel-crumbles-and-says-no-to-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Citadel</category><category>Citadel Investment Group</category><category>Hedge Funds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why did the Dow fall 385 points this week?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/09/why-did-the-dow-fall-385-points-this-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/09/why-did-the-dow-fall-385-points-this-week/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/09/why-did-the-dow-fall-385-points-this-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_down_down_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The Dow lost 385 points this week with a 315 point election day rally on Tuesday, two consecutive days which totaled 929 points down, and a Friday rally of 248 points. Did the market rise on hopes of a McCain upset only to fall due to disappointment that Obama won? Did the market rally Friday because the <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20081108/BUSINESS07/811080340?imw=Y">6.5% unemployment rate</a> was not as bad as expected? It could be, but I doubt it.</p>
<p>More likely, the markets are moving because of the trading behavior of endowments, pension funds, and hedge funds. They make decisions for very different reasons. But some reporting on daily market movements looks like a joke -- nobody knows why the market goes up or down, but commenters use price movements as a daily barometer of the national mood. So how do endowments, pension funds, and hedge funds move the markets? Here's how:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Endowments.</strong> Big university endowments, such as Harvard's, are desperately trying to unload billions of dollars worth of illiquid interests in venture capital and private equity firms. Harvard is reportedly trying to dump <a href="http://www.clusterstock.com/2008/11/harvard-yale-et-al-down-25-30-">$1.5 billion worth</a> of such interests into a market where there is likely to be very little interest. Not only that, these private equity firms are demanding that endowments <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB122610188023510005.html?mod=ba_car_twm&amp;page=sp">fork over the money</a> they committed to them so they can make new investments. And with the S&amp;P 500 down 36.6% so far this year, many endowments are selling anything liquid to meet these commitments and to pay shorter-term obligations -- such as paying professors and keeping the lights on. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/09/why-did-the-dow-fall-385-points-this-week/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why did the Dow fall 385 points this week?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/09/why-did-the-dow-fall-385-points-this-week/">Why did the Dow fall 385 points this week?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 09 Nov 2008 08:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/09/why-did-the-dow-fall-385-points-this-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1366506/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/09/why-did-the-dow-fall-385-points-this-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calpers</category><category>citadel</category><category>citadel investment group</category><category>citadelinvestmentcorp.</category><category>citadelinvestmentgroup</category><category>harvard</category><category>harvard university</category><category>mccain</category><category>mccainvs.obama</category><category>obama</category><category>obama administration</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>unemployment rates</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 08:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hot-shot hedge fund manager, Kenneth Griffin, gets crushed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/hot-shot-hedge-fund-manager-kenneth-griffin-gets-crushed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/hot-shot-hedge-fund-manager-kenneth-griffin-gets-crushed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/hot-shot-hedge-fund-manager-kenneth-griffin-gets-crushed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/citadel.jpg" alt="" />Kenneth Griffin, who manages the massive Citadel Investment Group Inc. hedge fund, has produced a sterling record over the past 20 years. Actually, he's one of the world's top money managers.</p>
<p>But, in "Black September," Griffin's tracked record got trashed. Apparently, his flagship fund is <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSN1535513320081016">down</a> as much as 22% for 2008.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, Wall Street has been abuzz with rumors that Citadel is dumping lots of shares - putting further pressure on the markets (and may have accounted for some of yesterday's losses on the Dow and S&amp;P).</p>
<p>But Citadel is not alone. Other hedge fund operators have also suffered major losses.</p>
<p>One key issue has been the erratic regulatory response to short selling (essentially, the ban made it illegal for hedge funds to make profits). Of course, investors have also been requesting redemptions.</p>
<p>In fact, it looks like some key hedge fund managers are staying on the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/hedge-fund-titans-head-for-the-hills/">sidelines</a> (can you really make money when the markets look irrational?)</p>
<p>As for Citadel, the fund had some other problems. For example, Griffin loaded up on convertible securities. While such things are okay in normal times, they can become illiquid during periods of crisis. Besides, the short-selling ban made it excruciatingly difficult to employ arbitrage strategies.</p>
<p>Something else: with the significant losses, hedge funds will have a hard to getting incentive fees. The reason is that they need to recoup the losses (this is known as the high-water mark). As a result, many hedge funds may decide to close shop.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/tomtaulli">Tom Taulli</a> is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0071393943?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0071393943">The Streetsmart Guide to Short Selling: Techniques the Pros Use to Profit in Any Market</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0071393943" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />. He is also the founder of <a href="http://www.bizequity.com">BizEquity</a></em>, a valuation website.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/hot-shot-hedge-fund-manager-kenneth-griffin-gets-crushed/">Hot-shot hedge fund manager, Kenneth Griffin, gets crushed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/hot-shot-hedge-fund-manager-kenneth-griffin-gets-crushed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1344020/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/hot-shot-hedge-fund-manager-kenneth-griffin-gets-crushed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Citadel</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Ken Griffin</category><category>KenGriffin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A takeover at E*Trade? Don't bet on it.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/a-takeover-at-e-trade-dont-bet-on-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/a-takeover-at-e-trade-dont-bet-on-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/a-takeover-at-e-trade-dont-bet-on-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*Trade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) is naming its chairman, former JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM) vice-chairman Donald Layton, to be the company's new CEO.<br /><br />The stock was trading up more than 5% on the news earlier, probably because of speculation of a possible sale. <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120450598417206517.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">reported</a> [subscription required] that "E*Trade and Citadel have discussed the possibility of trying to find a buyer for the home-equity portfolio, which would lift a tremendous burden off E*Trade and could pave the way for a sale of the entire company, according to people familiar with the matter."<br /><br />But Mr. Layton told the <em>Journal </em>that selling the home-equity portfolio is not an option right now.<br /><br />I think investors should, as always, be extremely cautious about buying shares in the company on takeover speculation. E*Trade's woes -- and declining share price -- are hardly an unknown entity given its status as a poster child of subprime stupidity. The fact that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas">Ameritrade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas">AMTD</a>) and other well-capitalized competitors, which had expressed interest in acquiring E*Trade before its precipitous decline in value aren't stepping up with an offer, tells me all I need to know: there's really no reason to think a deal is coming any time soon.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/a-takeover-at-e-trade-dont-bet-on-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A takeover at E*Trade? Don't bet on it.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/a-takeover-at-e-trade-dont-bet-on-it/">A takeover at E*Trade? Don't bet on it.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/is-e-trade-etfc-getting-ready-for-a-sale/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/a-takeover-at-e-trade-dont-bet-on-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1129765/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/a-takeover-at-e-trade-dont-bet-on-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ameritrade</category><category>amtd</category><category>citadel</category><category>E*TRADE</category><category>ETFC</category><category>ETRADE</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hedge funds profit from subprime mess]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/hedge-funds-profit-from-subprime-mess/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/hedge-funds-profit-from-subprime-mess/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/hedge-funds-profit-from-subprime-mess/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p>As we read of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/13/citigroup-expected-to-lose-97-cents/">writedowns</a>, impending bankruptcies, and the faltering U.S. consumer, it's interesting to get a glimpse at the players behind this whole snafu.</p>
<p><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> published <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120027155742887331.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us">an article</a> today about Magnetar Capital, a fund started by a star trader from Citadel Investment Group. Magnetar was a key player in the structuring of CDOs, or collateralized debt obligations. Magnetar acted as a "lynch-pin investor" in over $30 billion of these syndicated bundles of subprime mortgages and derivatives, according to the article.  </p>
<p>In spite of the losses being racked up on Wall Street, the fund, with about $9 billion in assets, made about 25% returns last year. </p>
<p>According to the article, "Magnetar swooped in on securities that it believed could become troubled but were paying big returns. CDOs are sliced based on risk, with the riskiest pieces having the highest yield but the greatest chance of losing value." Magnetar concentrated its trading on these riskiest pieces.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/hedge-funds-profit-from-subprime-mess/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hedge funds profit from subprime mess</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/hedge-funds-profit-from-subprime-mess/">Hedge funds profit from subprime mess</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/hedge-funds-profit-from-subprime-mess/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1086016/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/hedge-funds-profit-from-subprime-mess/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CDO</category><category>citadel</category><category>housing</category><category>Magnetar Capital</category><category>MagnetarCapital</category><category>mortgages</category><category>subprime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Google, Cablevision to bid for FCC spectrum]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/newspaper-wrap-up-google-cablevision-to-bid-for-fcc-spectrum/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/newspaper-wrap-up-google-cablevision-to-bid-for-fcc-spectrum/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/newspaper-wrap-up-google-cablevision-to-bid-for-fcc-spectrum/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trb/" rel="tag">Tribune Co. (TRB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/qcom/" rel="tag">QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119803481281138657.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported that in a list released last night by the FCC, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys">Cablevision Systems Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys">CVC</a>) and other "nontraditional" players are set to compete against more traditional wireless companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas">Qualcomm Incorporated</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas">QCOM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/metropcs-communications-inc/pcs/nys">MetroPCS Communications Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/metropcs-communications-inc/pcs/nys">PCS</a>) in the federal government's spectrum auction next month.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Banks that include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch &amp; Co Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">The Bear Stearns Companies Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) are reportedly in talks to help bail out struggling bond insurer ACA Capital Holdings, which lost $1B in the most recent quarter, according to two people briefed on the situation and reported by the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/19/business/19swaps.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin"><em>New York Times</em></a>; ACA Capital has guaranteed $26B in mortgage securities.</li>
    <li>Executives at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys">Tribune Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys">TRB</a>) were faced with last-minute questioning from bankers that were reluctant to fund the final portion of the $8.2B deal to take the company private, according to sources close to the company, the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-071218fitzsimons,0,6979039.story?coll=chi_tab04_layout"><em>Chicago Tribune</em></a> reported.</li>
</ul>
<strong>WEB SITES:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB119795141956136179.html?mod=9_0001_b_online_exclusives_tab_left"><em>Barron's Online's</em></a> "Inside Scoop" reported that analysts are not convinced that the deal with Citadel is enough to save <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*Trade Financial Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>), as it does not eliminate E*Trade's $12.4B second-lien mortgage exposure, and the company could potentially face further customer attrition, which many think will continue to pressure the shares.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/newspaper-wrap-up-google-cablevision-to-bid-for-fcc-spectrum/">Newspaper wrap-up: Google, Cablevision to bid for FCC spectrum</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/newspaper-wrap-up-google-cablevision-to-bid-for-fcc-spectrum/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1066550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/newspaper-wrap-up-google-cablevision-to-bid-for-fcc-spectrum/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>Cablevision</category><category>Citadel</category><category>CVC</category><category>E*Trade</category><category>ETFC</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>MER</category><category>Merill Lynch</category><category>MerillLynch</category><category>MetroPCS</category><category>PCS</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>TRB</category><category>Tribune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[E*Trade's not-quite-full disclosure of its deal with Citadel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/e-trades-not-quite-full-disclosure-of-its-deal-with-citadel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/e-trades-not-quite-full-disclosure-of-its-deal-with-citadel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/e-trades-not-quite-full-disclosure-of-its-deal-with-citadel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="E*Trade Financial (NYSE: ETFC) logo " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/etrade-etfc-logo.gif" />Legally, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">E*Trade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ETFC</a>)'s <a href="https://investor.etrade.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=279066">press release</a> announcing its deal with Citadel might have been fine.<br /><br />But <a href="http://dailybriefing.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/05/etrade-springs-a-surprise/">according</a> to <span style="font-style: italic;">Fortune</span>'s Colin Barr, the 8-K detailing the transaction makes it sound a lot less appealing. Barr writes, "One reason the Citadel deal initially appeared so bullish for E*Trade was that Citadel was taking big, apparently unhedged, debt and equity stakes in the struggling online financial company -- seemingly betting that it could oversee a recovery in the company's fortunes."<br /><br />But the reality is that much of the debt Citadel bought could become more senior than the other senior debt in the event of a bankruptcy.<br /><br />This looks a little bit like the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/is-bank-of-americas-bac-purchase-of-countrwide-financial-cfc/">infusion</a> that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">Countrywide Financia</a>l (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">CFC</a>) got from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BAC</a>). The $2 billion investment gave Countrywide notes paying a 7.25% interest rate to Bank of America and providing the bank an option to purchase Countrywide shares at $18 -- 41% below their their market price back then (of course, the infusion has, long-term, done little to stop the bleeding: Countrywide now trades at just $10.42 per share.<br /><br />The point is that hedge funds and banks, usually (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) says hi) don't dole out money with pathological stupidity. Citadel invested as a vulture, and got a great deal by preying on E*Trade's desperation and fear of bankruptcy.<br /><br />There's nothing wrong with that, but it's hardly bullish for E*Trade.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/e-trades-not-quite-full-disclosure-of-its-deal-with-citadel/">E*Trade's not-quite-full disclosure of its deal with Citadel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/e-trades-not-quite-full-disclosure-of-its-deal-with-citadel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1056054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/e-trades-not-quite-full-disclosure-of-its-deal-with-citadel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>CFC</category><category>Citadel</category><category>Countrywide Financial</category><category>CountrywideFinancial</category><category>E*Trade</category><category>ETFC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[E*Trade raises its rates for customers -- desperation?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/e-trade-raises-its-rates-for-customers-desperation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/e-trade-raises-its-rates-for-customers-desperation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/e-trade-raises-its-rates-for-customers-desperation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p>A good rule of the thumb for investors is not to own shares in desperate companies. Desperate companies do desperate things, and acts of desperation are often detrimental to the creation of shareholder value.<br /><br />Less than a week after <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/e-trade-hey-mitch-how-about-paying-investors-back/">selling</a> $3 billion worth of asset-backed securities for about 30 cents on the dollar, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*Trade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) is hiking the yields on its savings account and short-term CDs.<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119647182311610262.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing"> According</a> to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "For savers, E*Trade's move presents an opportunity to take advantage of rates that are among the highest available on short-term deposit accounts and are several percentage points above national averages."<br /><br />And now, ladies and gentleman, the greatest PR spin of the month, courtesy of Jarrett Lilien, E*Trade's acting chief executive. She told the Journal that "it was a great opportunity to give a thank you to our loyal customers in the face of a difficult time like the last couple of weeks".
<p>Right -- but what about the shareholders who will see the higher rates paid right out of what's left of E*Trade's equity?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/e-trade-raises-its-rates-for-customers-desperation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>E*Trade raises its rates for customers -- desperation?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/e-trade-raises-its-rates-for-customers-desperation/">E*Trade raises its rates for customers -- desperation?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119647182311610262.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/e-trade-raises-its-rates-for-customers-desperation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1053019/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/e-trade-raises-its-rates-for-customers-desperation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Citadel</category><category>ETFC</category><category>ETRADE</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[E*Trade: Hey Mitch, how about paying investors back]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/e-trade-hey-mitch-how-about-paying-investors-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/e-trade-hey-mitch-how-about-paying-investors-back/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/e-trade-hey-mitch-how-about-paying-investors-back/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="160" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/etrade.gif" />Today's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/flash-e-trade-gets-huge-investment-from-citadel-investment-grou/">news</a> of E*Trade(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) receiving a $2.5 billion cash infusion as part of selling off its $3 billion asset-backed securities (ABS) portfolio, including its ABS collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and second lien securities to Citadel Investment Group, is bound to the talk of Wall Street. As usual there are two big winners and one big loser. </p>
<p>The winners: </p>
<p>Citadel scores big-time getting the $3 billion ABS business for about $0.30 on the dollar. I can only imagine how much money it is going to make on that deal. Once the dust clears from the whole subprime mess, and credit markets calm, this portfolio will skyrocket in value and Citadel will laugh all the way to the bank. </p>
<p>Mitch Caplan, the CEO who gets to go home with a huge package. Glad to see the man who oversaw this whole mess is going to walk away with millions.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/e-trade-hey-mitch-how-about-paying-investors-back/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>E*Trade: Hey Mitch, how about paying investors back</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/e-trade-hey-mitch-how-about-paying-investors-back/">E*Trade: Hey Mitch, how about paying investors back</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119630834657507587.html?mod=djemalert>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/e-trade-hey-mitch-how-about-paying-investors-back/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1050647/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/e-trade-hey-mitch-how-about-paying-investors-back/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>citadel</category><category>etfc</category><category>etrade</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Flash: E*Trade gets huge investment from Citadel Investment Group]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/flash-e-trade-gets-huge-investment-from-citadel-investment-grou/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/flash-e-trade-gets-huge-investment-from-citadel-investment-grou/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/flash-e-trade-gets-huge-investment-from-citadel-investment-grou/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119630834657507587.html?mod=djemalert">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>"<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">E*Trade Financial</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ETFC</a>), which is ensnared in the mortgage crisis, is getting a $2.55 billion cash infusion from Citadel Investment Group."</p>
<p>Citadel will "purchase E*Trade's entire $3 billion portfolio of asset-backed securities for a value of around $800 million." The balance of the money will go in as 10-year notes with a 12.5% interest rate. Citadel will end up owning 20% of the company and have a seat on the board.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/flash-e-trade-gets-huge-investment-from-citadel-investment-grou/">Flash: E*Trade gets huge investment from Citadel Investment Group</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119630834657507587.html?mod=djemalert>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/flash-e-trade-gets-huge-investment-from-citadel-investment-grou/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1050625/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/flash-e-trade-gets-huge-investment-from-citadel-investment-grou/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>citadel</category><category>e-trade</category><category>etfc</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst upgrades: EBAY, EXPE, NOK and YRCW]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/analyst-upgrades-8-03-07-ebay-expe-nok-and-yrcw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/analyst-upgrades-8-03-07-ebay-expe-nok-and-yrcw/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/analyst-upgrades-8-03-07-ebay-expe-nok-and-yrcw/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/expe/" rel="tag">Expedia Inc (EXPE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yrcw/" rel="tag">YRC Worldwide (YRCW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/aol-fly-logo.gif" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>Expedia (EXPE), YRC Worldwide (YRCW), Fiserv (FISV), and select radio stocks were today's noteworthy upgrades: <br />
<ul>
    <li>JP Morgan upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expedia-inc-del/expe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Expedia </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expedia-inc-del/expe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">EXPE</a>) to Overweight from Neutral on expectations for U.S. bookings growth and margin stabilization. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yrc-worldwide-inc/yrcw/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YRC Worldwide</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yrc-worldwide-inc/yrcw/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YRCW</a>) was raised to Neutral from Underperform based on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fiserv-inc/fisv/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Fiserv </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fiserv-inc/fisv/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">FISV</a>) was upgraded to Sector Outperformer from Sector Performer at CIBC following the CheckFree (CKFR) acquisition. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Banc of America upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citadel-broadcasting-corporation/cdl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Citadel Broadcasting</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citadel-broadcasting-corporation/cdl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CDL</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cox-radio-inc-cl-a/cxr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Cox Radio</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cox-radio-inc-cl-a/cxr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CXR</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/entercom-communications-corp/etm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Entercom Comm</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/entercom-communications-corp/etm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ETM</a>) to Neutral from Sell as they believe it is time to cover short positions with the expected Q3 weakness likely priced into shares. They caution that this upgrade is not a buy signal as downside risk remains... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER UPGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Wachovia upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lear-corporation/lea/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Cabela's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lear-corporation/lea/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CAB</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kbr-inc/kbr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">KBR Inc </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kbr-inc/kbr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">KBR</a>) to Outperform from Market Perform. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Baird raised <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lear-corporation/lea/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lear </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lear-corporation/lea/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LEA</a>) To Outperform from Neutral. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Nokia </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NOK</a>) was upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Credit Suisse. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Pacific Crest upgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">eBay </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">EBAY</a>) to Outperform from Sector Perform.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com </a>(subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/analyst-upgrades-8-03-07-ebay-expe-nok-and-yrcw/">Analyst upgrades: EBAY, EXPE, NOK and YRCW</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/analyst-upgrades-8-03-07-ebay-expe-nok-and-yrcw/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/957201/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/analyst-upgrades-8-03-07-ebay-expe-nok-and-yrcw/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>cab</category><category>cabela</category><category>cdl</category><category>checkfree</category><category>citadel</category><category>ckfr</category><category>cox</category><category>cxr</category><category>ebay</category><category>entercom</category><category>etm</category><category>expe</category><category>expedia</category><category>fiserv</category><category>kbr</category><category>lea</category><category>lear</category><category>nok</category><category>nokia</category><category>rating</category><category>roadway</category><category>upgrade</category><category>yellow</category><category>yrcw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst upgrades 6-19-07: CDL, CI, DTV, LCC and LFC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/analyst-upgrades-6-19-07-ci-cdl-dtv-lcc-and-lfc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/analyst-upgrades-6-19-07-ci-cdl-dtv-lcc-and-lfc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/analyst-upgrades-6-19-07-ci-cdl-dtv-lcc-and-lfc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ci/" rel="tag">CIGNA Corp (CI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lfc/" rel="tag">China Life Insurance ADS (LFC)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>US Airways (LCC), Cigna Corp (CI), Gentex Corp (GNTX) and China Life Insurance (LFC) were today's more noteworthy upgrades: <br />
<ul>
    <li>UBS upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/u-s-airways-group-inc/lcc/nys">US Airways</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/u-s-airways-group-inc/lcc/nys">LCC</a>) to Neutral from Reduce based on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cigna-corporation/ci/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Cigna Corp </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cigna-corporation/ci/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CI</a>) was upgraded to Neutral from Sell at Banc of America to reflect the company's market share gains and share buybacks. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Banc of America also raised <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gentex-corporation/gntx/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Gentex Corp </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gentex-corporation/gntx/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GNTX</a>) to Buy from Neutral to reflect increased penetration of the company's new rear-camera display product. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Deutsche Bank upgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/china-life-insurance-company-limited/lfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">China Life Insurance</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/china-life-insurance-company-limited/lfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LFC</a>) to Hold from Sell on valuation and the continued strong equity markets... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER UPGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Morgan Stanley raised <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc/dtv/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DirecTV Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc/dtv/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DTV</a>) to Overweight from Equal Weight. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Citigroup upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sempra-energy/sre/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Sempra Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sempra-energy/sre/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">SRE</a>) to Buy from Hold. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/acorda-therapeutics-inc/acor/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Acorda Therapeutics</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/acorda-therapeutics-inc/acor/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ACOR</a>) was upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Banc of America. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Merrill Lynch raised <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citadel-broadcasting-corporation/cdl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Citadel Broadcasting Corp's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citadel-broadcasting-corporation/cdl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CDL</a>) rating to Buy from Neutral.  </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cybersource-corporation/cybs/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CyberSource Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cybersource-corporation/cybs/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CYBS</a>) was upgraded to Buy from Accumulate at ThinkEquity.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/analyst-upgrades-6-19-07-ci-cdl-dtv-lcc-and-lfc/">Analyst upgrades 6-19-07: CDL, CI, DTV, LCC and LFC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/analyst-upgrades-6-19-07-ci-cdl-dtv-lcc-and-lfc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921477/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/analyst-upgrades-6-19-07-ci-cdl-dtv-lcc-and-lfc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acor</category><category>acorda</category><category>analyst</category><category>cdl</category><category>china life</category><category>ChinaLife</category><category>ci</category><category>cigna</category><category>citadel</category><category>cybersource</category><category>cybs</category><category>directv</category><category>dtv</category><category>gentex</category><category>gntx</category><category>lcc</category><category>lfc</category><category>rating</category><category>sempra</category><category>sre</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>upgrade</category><category>us air</category><category>UsAir</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC settles payola probe for a song]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/fcc-settles-payola-probe-for-a-song/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/fcc-settles-payola-probe-for-a-song/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/fcc-settles-payola-probe-for-a-song/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ccu/" rel="tag">Clear Channel Commun (CCU)</a></p>To the tune of just $12.5 million, the Federal Communications Commission on Friday wagged a white-gloved finger at four top radio broadcasters -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clear-channel-communications-inc/ccu/nys">Clear Channel Communications Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clear-channel-communications-inc/ccu/nys">CCU</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys">CBS Radio</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) (<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/cbs-drops-imus-morning/story.aspx?guid=%7B8FEC4524%2D8D78%2D4A00%2D976C%2D41D0BF053F72%7D">not CBS's best week</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/entercom-communications-corp/etm/nys">Entercom Communications Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/entercom-communications-corp/etm/nys">ETM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citadel-broadcasting-corporation/cdl/nys">Citadel Broadcasting Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citadel-broadcasting-corporation/cdl/nys">CDL</a>) -- resolving a two-year payola investigation. "A breakthrough and a milestone" in the war on payola, FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein called the settlement.<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br /><br /></span><a href="http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/PayolaRules.html">The FCC's longstanding regulations</a> don't actually prohibit the pay-for-play system, they merely require its disclosure at the time of broadcast. Said Adelstein, "These rules are based on the basic principle that listeners and viewers are entitled to know who is seeking to persuade them so they can make up their own minds about the content."<br /><br />Such a principle is hardly "basic," and ignorance of sponsorship gives no pass to indiscriminating radio listeners. Marketing pays our fare at every turn; we've become resigned to the notion that behind every song we hear, every TV image we view, every word we read (including these), a dollar sign usually lies quietly. The trick to Adelstein's basic principle is not in knowing who's paying the piper -- or who the piper's paying, in this case -- but in quieting one's cynicism enough to hear the music.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/fcc-settles-payola-probe-for-a-song/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FCC settles payola probe for a song</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/fcc-settles-payola-probe-for-a-song/">FCC settles payola probe for a song</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/fcc-settles-payola-probe-for-a-song/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/874485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/fcc-settles-payola-probe-for-a-song/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A2IM</category><category>American Association of Independent Music</category><category>AmericanAssociationOfIndependentMusic</category><category>CBS</category><category>CBS Radio</category><category>CbsRadio</category><category>CCU</category><category>CDL</category><category>Citadel</category><category>Clear Channel Communications</category><category>ClearChannelCommunications</category><category>Entercom</category><category>ETM</category><category>pay for play</category><category>PayForPlay</category><category>payola</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Summerlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citadel raises $500 million -- a hedge fund bubble?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/citadel-raises-500-million-a-new-bubble/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/citadel-raises-500-million-a-new-bubble/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/citadel-raises-500-million-a-new-bubble/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>Last week, Citadel Investment Group sold one of the first ever unsecured bond offering issued by a hedge fund, according to <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article_search/SB116562514805445146.html?mod=search&amp;KEYWORDS=citadel&amp;COLLECTION=barrons/archive">Barron's magazine</a> (subscription required). Citadel raised $500 million.<br /><br />Apparently, Citadel will offer a total of $ 2.0 billion in unsecured bonds. A co-founder of Hennessee Group, a professional hedge-fund cheerleader, called the move "brilliant." The cheerleader further commented that it is cheaper than raising capital from limited partners.<br /><br />The issue got a triple-B rating from Fitch and the deal was two times oversubscribed.<br /><br />According to this Fly, this has all the warning signs of a disaster waiting to happen. Does Citadel now take all that leverage and borrow more from its prime broker, borrowing more against its already leveraged balance sheet?<br /><br />This sounds similar to the mortgage and housing bubble which is currently unwinding. The housing bubble hit peak valuations when lenders were willing to lend at full value or in excess of the full value of the underlying real estate, requiring no equity investment.<br /><br />In Citadel's case, why raise equity capital from limited partners when you can go out and borrow it? Who needs equity? Good luck bondholders.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/citadel-raises-500-million-a-new-bubble/">Citadel raises $500 million -- a hedge fund bubble?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://users1.barrons.com/lmda/do/checkLogin?mg=evo-barrons&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.barrons.com%2Farticle_search%2FSB116562514805445146.html%3Fmod%3Dsearch%26KEYWORDS%3Dcitadel%26COLLECTION%3Dbarrons%2Farchive>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/citadel-raises-500-million-a-new-bubble/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/716448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/citadel-raises-500-million-a-new-bubble/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barron's</category><category>barrons</category><category>citadel</category><category>citadel investment group</category><category>CitadelInvestmentGroup</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>unsecured bond</category><category>UnsecuredBond</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:46:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
