<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Toxic Stock Update #4 -- BAC, BP, C, GE, GS, RIG]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/11/chasing-value-toxic-stock-update-4-bac-bp-c-ge-gs-rig/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/11/chasing-value-toxic-stock-update-4-bac-bp-c-ge-gs-rig/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/11/chasing-value-toxic-stock-update-4-bac-bp-c-ge-gs-rig/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rig/" rel="tag">Transocean Ltd. (RIG)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/transocean-logo.jpg" />Back in the summer of 2010 when the market was down, the gulf was full of spewing oil and investors were running away from bad news stocks shocked most notably by BP (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a>) oil spill, I decided to post <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/19/buying-a-toxic-portfolio-bp-rig-c-gs-bac-ge/">a contrarian story</a> reminding readers that the fear was overblown and created a buying opportunity.<br />
<br />
"My pal Warren" has said for years that we should buy on fear and sell on greed. The toxic stock portfolio was a result of this sentiment.
<p>This is the fourth update to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/19/buying-a-toxic-portfolio-bp-rig-c-gs-bac-ge/">my ranting eight months ago</a> that acquiring six of the most hated, and most highly traded stocks with constant negative headlines would outperform the overall market. The theory has born fruit as the toxic stocks are ahead and the difference is increasing over time.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/11/chasing-value-toxic-stock-update-4-bac-bp-c-ge-gs-rig/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Toxic Stock Update #4 -- BAC, BP, C, GE, GS, RIG</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/11/chasing-value-toxic-stock-update-4-bac-bp-c-ge-gs-rig/">Chasing Value: Toxic Stock Update #4 -- BAC, BP, C, GE, GS, RIG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/11/chasing-value-toxic-stock-update-4-bac-bp-c-ge-gs-rig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19876642/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/11/chasing-value-toxic-stock-update-4-bac-bp-c-ge-gs-rig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>BP</category><category>Brk.a</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>C</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Citigroup Inc.</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>GolmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>RIG</category><category>stock picks</category><category>toxic stocks portfolio</category><category>Transocean Inc</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: 2011 Picks Dust the S&amp;P]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/01/chasing-value-2011-picks-dust-the-sandp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/01/chasing-value-2011-picks-dust-the-sandp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/01/chasing-value-2011-picks-dust-the-sandp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nct/" rel="tag">Newcastle Investment (NCT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ezpw/" rel="tag">EZCORP (EZPW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tef/" rel="tag">Telefonica SA (TEF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ne/" rel="tag">Noble Corporation (NE)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/telefnicalogo.jpg" alt="" />We are only one month into the new year and there have not been many dull moments. Games are going on in the Middle East and they are not the friendly kind. In Egypt <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/01/egypts-army-stands-aside-as-protesters-vow-to-top-1-million/">a million plus protesters</a> are playing a game of chicken with the Mubarak government demanding he step down from his 32-year-old reign as perpetual president.<br />
<br />
This is not radical Islam fundamentalists; it is even more fundamental. The people want to improve their daily lives in a meaningful way. Education, infrastructure, clean water and clean streets. Speaking of infrastructure and getting back to the less dramatic but still important great stock picks Telefonica (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/telefonica-s-a/tef/nys">TEF</a>) and General Electric (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) were the big winners so far bouncing over 10% in January.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/01/chasing-value-2011-picks-dust-the-sandp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: 2011 Picks Dust the S&amp;P</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/01/chasing-value-2011-picks-dust-the-sandp/">Chasing Value: 2011 Picks Dust the S&amp;P</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/01/chasing-value-2011-picks-dust-the-sandp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19823146/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/01/chasing-value-2011-picks-dust-the-sandp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Chevron</category><category>Citigroup Inc.</category><category>CVX</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>EZCorp Inc</category><category>EZPW</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>HCII</category><category>HomeownersInsurance</category><category>Merck Co</category><category>MRK</category><category>NCT</category><category>NE</category><category>NewcastleInvestment</category><category>Noble Corp.</category><category>Raytheon Company</category><category>RTN</category><category>SP 500</category><category>stock picks</category><category>Stocks to buy</category><category>TEF</category><category>telefonica</category><category>value investing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- 10 and 11]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-10-and-11/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-10-and-11/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-10-and-11/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nct/" rel="tag">Newcastle Investment (NCT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ezpw/" rel="tag">EZCORP (EZPW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tef/" rel="tag">Telefonica SA (TEF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ne/" rel="tag">Noble Corporation (NE)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/01/homeownerschoicelogo-1294671649.jpg" alt="" />I have already gone on record this year saying that financial companies and insurance stocks are going to continue to rebound. In my previous two posts <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-5-of-11/" title="View Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- 5 of 11 on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- 5 of 11 </a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-6-7-8-9/" title="View Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- 6, 7, 8, 9 on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- 6, 7, 8, 9, </a> I included several financial institutions. Today I add an insurance company.</p>
<p>The industry got whacked hard for many reasons. For one, it makes a significant amount of profit by investing its float, and like every other investor, the industry lost a pile of money in the financial crisis. It was embroiled more directly than some industries, as several insurers are affiliated with banks. Finally the housing crisis meant disruption to payment streams by homeowners who were delinquent on more than their mortgages.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-10-and-11/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- 10 and 11</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-10-and-11/">Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- 10 and 11</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-10-and-11/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19790565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-10-and-11/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>C</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>cheap stocks</category><category>Chevron</category><category>Citigroup Inc.</category><category>CVX</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>EZCorp Inc</category><category>EZPW</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>HCII</category><category>Homeowners Choice</category><category>Inc</category><category>Merck</category><category>MRK</category><category>NCT</category><category>NE</category><category>newcastle investment</category><category>Noble Corp.</category><category>Raytheon Company</category><category>stock picks for 2011</category><category>TEF</category><category>telefonica</category><category>value stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- Part 2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-part-2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-part-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deo/" rel="tag">Diageo plc (DEO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nvs/" rel="tag">Novartis AG ADS (NVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/teva/" rel="tag">Teva Pharm Indus ADR (TEVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lfc/" rel="tag">China Life Insurance ADS (LFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nct/" rel="tag">Newcastle Investment (NCT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ezpw/" rel="tag">EZCORP (EZPW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rds-a/" rel="tag">Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tef/" rel="tag">Telefonica SA (TEF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ne/" rel="tag">Noble Corporation (NE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/newcastle-logo-1293463100.jpg" alt="Newcastle Investments (NCT) logo" />Could <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/chasing-value-newcastles-huge-gain-leaves-me-at-a-loss/">a stock that you made 1,100%</a> on still have room to run? Yes, it is possible. In particular if it had a near death experience as a penny stock for a while.</p>
<p>That is the case with Newcastle Investments (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/newcastle-investment-corporation/nct/nys">NCT</a>), the CMBS lender and real estate investment company that reached a recent high of $7.10 and has settled back down, most recently hovering between $6.70 to $7.00. It closed Thursday December 23 at $6.71.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-part-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- Part 2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-part-2/">Chasing Value: 2011 Stock Picks -- Part 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-part-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19745477/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/27/chasing-value-2011-stock-picks-part-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>C</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Chevron</category><category>China Life Insurance</category><category>Citigroup Inc.</category><category>DEO</category><category>Diageo plc</category><category>EZCorp Inc</category><category>EZPW</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>LFC</category><category>NCT</category><category>NE</category><category>newcastle investment</category><category>Noble Corp.</category><category>Novartis</category><category>NVS</category><category>oil</category><category>Raytheon Company</category><category>RDS.A</category><category>royal dutch shell</category><category>RTN</category><category>TEF</category><category>telefonica</category><category>TEVA</category><category>Teva Pharmaceuticals</category><category>warren buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Global fight brewing over frozen funds from Iran]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/13/global-fight-brewing-over-frozen-funds-from-iran/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/13/global-fight-brewing-over-frozen-funds-from-iran/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/13/global-fight-brewing-over-frozen-funds-from-iran/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/citigroup-logo-200x150.gif" />Last year, a U.S. District Court in Manhattan secretly froze $2 billion held in a Citigroup (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys" target="_blank">C</a>) account. The money was believed to have been held on behalf of Iran, through Luxembourg's Clearstream Banking S.A. In what the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reports could be <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126057864707988237.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection" target="_blank">the largest seizure of Iranian assets</a> abroad since the Islamic revolution of 1979, several parties are lining up to claim the cash. And, it looks like the battle is headed for trial.</p>
<p>The order to freeze the funds was executed 18 months ago by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and hasn't been made public. In issuing the legal order, the court used information from the <a href="http://www.treasury.gov" target="_blank">U.S. Treasury Department</a>. Though the money is frozen, the struggle is heating up.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/13/global-fight-brewing-over-frozen-funds-from-iran/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Global fight brewing over frozen funds from Iran</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/13/global-fight-brewing-over-frozen-funds-from-iran/">Global fight brewing over frozen funds from Iran</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/13/global-fight-brewing-over-frozen-funds-from-iran/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19276463/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/13/global-fight-brewing-over-frozen-funds-from-iran/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Citigroup Inc.</category><category>clearstream</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iran</category><category>luxembourg</category><category>manhattan</category><category>marines</category><category>new york city</category><category>treasury department</category><category>us district court</category><category>us marines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BofA to repay TARP money, rest to follow?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/bofa-to-repay-tarp-money-rest-to-follow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/bofa-to-repay-tarp-money-rest-to-follow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/bofa-to-repay-tarp-money-rest-to-follow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="140" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/bofa_240.jpg" alt="" />Bank of America (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) surprised the market on Wednesday by <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5B15YD20091203">announcing that it would repay the $45 billion in TARP money</a> it received over the next few days. This gives the company much more flexibility in compensating its employees, but it could leave the bank exposed to future economic shocks.</p>
<p>CEO Kenneth Lewis, who's expected to retire at the end of the month, said he wanted to take care of this before leaving the firm. This decision comes at a great time for the Treasury Department, which has been feeling the heat for committing taxpayer resources to a dicey problem without seeing much progress yet.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/bofa-to-repay-tarp-money-rest-to-follow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BofA to repay TARP money, rest to follow?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/bofa-to-repay-tarp-money-rest-to-follow/">BofA to repay TARP money, rest to follow?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5B15YD20091203>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/bofa-to-repay-tarp-money-rest-to-follow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19263044/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/bofa-to-repay-tarp-money-rest-to-follow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup Inc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tarp</category><category>Troubled Asset Relief Program</category><category>TroubledAssetReliefProgram</category><category>WellsFargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[After $496 billion, how much more can we bail out Citi and AIG?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/after-496-billion-how-much-more-we-can-bail-out-citi-and-aig/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/after-496-billion-how-much-more-we-can-bail-out-citi-and-aig/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/after-496-billion-how-much-more-we-can-bail-out-citi-and-aig/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/another_citigroup_logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"><strong>Citigroup</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and <strong></strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><strong>American International Group</strong></a><strong> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><strong>AIG</strong></a>) have already taken about $496 billion in U.S. cash and guarantees to keep them from failing. This makes me wonder: Is there no way to allow them to simply fail without causing the entire global financial system to collapse? And if not, is there a limit to how much more taxpayer money we pour into them before we say "no more"? The answers: Maybe and Yes.</p>
<p>Citi looks to be a basket case after $345 billion in taxpayer bailouts. It has already gotten <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a6W90SKfZYZI&amp;refer=home">$45 billion</a> in cash -- $25 billion of which was recently converted from preferred to common -- and $301 billion in guarantees of its toxic assets. The U.S. now owns 36% of the common stock of Citi -- which lost $27.7 billion in 2008 and has a market capitalization -- Citi common shares times price per share -- of $8.2 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/after-496-billion-how-much-more-we-can-bail-out-citi-and-aig/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>After $496 billion, how much more can we bail out Citi and AIG?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/after-496-billion-how-much-more-we-can-bail-out-citi-and-aig/">After $496 billion, how much more can we bail out Citi and AIG?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/after-496-billion-how-much-more-we-can-bail-out-citi-and-aig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1474543/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/after-496-billion-how-much-more-we-can-bail-out-citi-and-aig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american international</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternational</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>credit default swap</category><category>credit default swaps</category><category>credit defaults</category><category>mortgage-backed securities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Citi CEO get a 33 cent bonus this year?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/will-citi-ceo-get-a-33-cent-bonus-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/will-citi-ceo-get-a-33-cent-bonus-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/will-citi-ceo-get-a-33-cent-bonus-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/p_pandit.png" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Congress is sending a bill to President Obama's desk that limits banker pay. Specifically 11 pages in the 1,073-page $787 billion stimulus bill describe a provision that <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29192298/">limits bonuses for executives</a> at all financial institutions getting government money to a maximum of a third of their salary. And these are not cash bonuses -- instead they'll be paid in company stock that executives can't sell until the government investment has been repaid.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"><strong>Citigroup</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) CEO Vikram Pandit, volunteered to take a $1 salary until his company returns to profitability. Assuming Citi posts a loss in 2009, Pandit's maximum bonus for the year will be 33 cents -- which at today's price would amount to a tenth of a share of Citi stock.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/will-citi-ceo-get-a-33-cent-bonus-this-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Citi CEO get a 33 cent bonus this year?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/will-citi-ceo-get-a-33-cent-bonus-this-year/">Will Citi CEO get a 33 cent bonus this year?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/will-citi-ceo-get-a-33-cent-bonus-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1460384/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/will-citi-ceo-get-a-33-cent-bonus-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>obama</category><category>obama administration</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stimuluspackage</category><category>vikram pandit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As Rubin departs Citi, deregulation gets a spike through its heart]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/as-rubin-departs-citi-deregulation-gets-a-spike-through-its-hea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/as-rubin-departs-citi-deregulation-gets-a-spike-through-its-hea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/as-rubin-departs-citi-deregulation-gets-a-spike-through-its-hea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/citigroupumbrella.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Last month, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/27/2008s-eight-worst-ideas/">posted</a> on 2008's eight worst ideas. At the top of my list was deregulation. Robert Rubin, who spent a decade as a director of <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and is now retiring, is partly responsible for one very important act of deregulation -- the repeal of <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/159092">Glass-Steagall</a> which separated investment and commercial banking. (It was former Citi CEO Sandy Weill's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/10/business/10rubin.html?ref=business">1998 merger</a> of his Travelers with Citi that spurred Glass-Steagall's repeal in the 1999 passage of the <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/159092">Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act</a> which allowed commercial and investment banks to own each other.)</p>
<p>And by bringing down that barrier -- established in the wake of the stock market manipulations of the 1920s enabled by commercial banks that made margin loans to trade stocks -- the U.S. helped usher in the current financial catastrophe. Now the government is gradually reimposing Glass-Steagall -- in effect, if not in law.</p>
<p>Rubin was well rewarded for his decade of "service" to Citi -- taking in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/10/business/10rubin.html?ref=business">$126 million</a> and being paid as an employee while claiming to be a mere advisor. But for that measly sum, Rubin's reputation -- which was at its zenith following his tenure as Treasury Secretary in the 1990s -- is shredded. It probably didn't help that since he joined Citi's board in October 1999, its stock has fallen 82% -- destroying $164 billion in stock market value. Meanwhile, the empire that Weill ushered in -- based on the idea that people wanted to buy all their financial services from one provider -- is being dismantled. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/as-rubin-departs-citi-deregulation-gets-a-spike-through-its-hea/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>As Rubin departs Citi, deregulation gets a spike through its heart</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/as-rubin-departs-citi-deregulation-gets-a-spike-through-its-hea/">As Rubin departs Citi, deregulation gets a spike through its heart</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/as-rubin-departs-citi-deregulation-gets-a-spike-through-its-hea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1425474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/as-rubin-departs-citi-deregulation-gets-a-spike-through-its-hea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>citi</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>glass steagall</category><category>inthenews</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>robert rubin</category><category>sandy weil</category><category>sandy weill</category><category>sanford weill</category><category>smith barney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Six banks with $540 billion in bailout money still flying 27 corporate jets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/six-banks-with-540-billion-in-bailout-money-still-flying-27-cor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/six-banks-with-540-billion-in-bailout-money-still-flying-27-cor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/six-banks-with-540-billion-in-bailout-money-still-flying-27-cor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p>Wonder what happened to the hard earned money you paid in taxes? I can't account for all of it but $540 billion that went to six financial institutions is being used, in part, to operate 27 corporate jets. I may be the only one who feels this way, but I don't think the survival of the global economy depends on using taxpayer money to pay for financial executives to fly on their own corporate jets.</p>
<p>Here are the six financial institutions with the amount of taxpayer money they received and the number of corporate jets they're still flying:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group Inc</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>). <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html">$150 billion, seven </a>corporate jets </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a></strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"> C</a>). <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html">$330 billion, four</a> jets. (The $330 billion includes Citi's initial <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/107785-the-government-s-pouring-money-into-a-bottomless-citi-pit">$25 billion</a> in TARP money plus its more recent <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/107785-the-government-s-pouring-money-into-a-bottomless-citi-pit">$305 billion</a> in loan guarantees.) </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>). <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html">$25 billion, one</a> jet </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Bank of America</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>). <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html">$25 billion, nine</a> jets -- its CEO Ken Lewis used <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html">$127,643</a> worth of its corporate jets </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) . $<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html">25 billion, four</a> jets -- its CEO Jamie Dimon's personal use of its corporate aircraft totaled <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html">$211,182</a> in 2007 </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>).<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html"> $10 billion</a>, two jets -- its CEO John Mack's personal use of its corporate aircraft totaled <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/21/business/AP-Meltdown-Corporate-Jets.html">$358,882</a> in 2007 </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/six-banks-with-540-billion-in-bailout-money-still-flying-27-cor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Six banks with $540 billion in bailout money still flying 27 corporate jets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/six-banks-with-540-billion-in-bailout-money-still-flying-27-cor/">Six banks with $540 billion in bailout money still flying 27 corporate jets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/six-banks-with-540-billion-in-bailout-money-still-flying-27-cor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1408059/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/six-banks-with-540-billion-in-bailout-money-still-flying-27-cor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>corporate jet</category><category>CorporateJet</category><category>jamie dimon</category><category>JamieDimon</category><category>john mack</category><category>JohnMack</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>ken lewis</category><category>KenLewis</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>wells fargo</category><category>WellsFargo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank Failure Count: FDIC closes 22nd bank of 2008]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/bank-failure-count-fdic-closes-22nd-bank-of-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/bank-failure-count-fdic-closes-22nd-bank-of-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/bank-failure-count-fdic-closes-22nd-bank-of-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/usb/" rel="tag">U.S. Bancorp (USB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img height="215" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" width="220" align="right" border="0" />The FDIC took over three banks yesterday, bringing the total <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gjmW6jIy3FcPs7T_yje3_tU_CT6AD94JPNKG0">number of bank failures</a> so far this year to 22. As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/16/how-the-fdic-rescues-a-failed-bank/">I posted</a>, the FDIC likes to close banks on Friday after hours so they can reopen as branches of the acquiring bank on the following Monday morning. But the U.S. better be working overtime this weekend because <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) is going to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=acxKsnU5HOAI&amp;refer=home">need a merger partner or a government rescue</a> to keep it from becoming history's biggest bank failure.</p>
<p>Of the three banks that failed Friday, two were in California -- Downey Savings and Loan Association (with $12.8 billion in assets and deposits of $9.7 billion), based in Newport Beach, and PFF Bank &amp; Trust of Pomona (with assets of $3.7 billion and $2.4 billion in deposits) -- and the third was in Georgia: The Community Bank, with $681 million in assets and $611.4 million in deposits in Loganville.</p>
<p>In each case, the FDIC arranged for a healthier bank to take over the deposits, branches, and some of the assets of the failed one. <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">U.S. Bancorp</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">USB</a>) acquired the deposits of the two California banks that were brought down by Option ARM mortgages -- which allow a borrower to skip payments and add the amount to the loan principle -- and housing construction loans. Bank of Essex, of Tappahannock, Va., bought all the bank deposits and $84.4 million of The Community Bank's assets -- the FDIC took on the rest.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/bank-failure-count-fdic-closes-22nd-bank-of-2008/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank Failure Count: FDIC closes 22nd bank of 2008</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/bank-failure-count-fdic-closes-22nd-bank-of-2008/">Bank Failure Count: FDIC closes 22nd bank of 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/bank-failure-count-fdic-closes-22nd-bank-of-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1380158/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/bank-failure-count-fdic-closes-22nd-bank-of-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank failures</category><category>bank of essex</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>downey savings and loan</category><category>fdic</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>pff bank and trust</category><category>us bancorp</category><category>us bankcorp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/wallstreetbankers.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />The financial crisis is not over. If things were back to normal, banks would be lending to each other and to businesses and individuals. But measures of bank lending risk suggest fear is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/government-actions-to-improve-credit-markets-could-weaken-dollar/">12 times</a> as high as it would be in normal times. The reason? Banks know more than you do about what's wrong. And they're not talking about it because they don't want you to withdraw your deposits and sell your stock. What they know is that on October 21st, some of the biggest players on Wall Street could be required to come up with <strong><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/99619-lehman-s-cds-mess-who-s-on-the-hook">$400 billion</a> that some may not be able to pay</strong>.</p>
<p>Last month, the White House decided that we could afford to let Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy. That proved to be an enormous mistake. It triggered a run on money market funds because one of the oldest such funds, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-moneyfund17-2008sep17,0,3171047.story">Reserve Primary</a>, broke the buck since it held Lehman Brothers paper. The U.S. responded with a <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/hp1147.htm">$50 billion</a> guarantee of money market funds. But the biggest consequence of that mistake is in the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a966RcwJ.aik&amp;refer=home">$54.6 trillion</a> market for Credit Default Swaps (CDSs).</p>
<p><strong>A CDS is like selling insurance on your car to hundreds of people who don't own it -- yet if your car goes up in flames each of those people collects the full value of your car. </strong>More specifically, CDSs are insurance against a bond or loan default. Why are CDSs so dangerous? Three reasons: a CDS seller does not need to put any capital aside to cover losses if the security defaults, the buyer doesn't need to own the asset it wants to protect, and there is no central place where information about all these CDS deals is collected and updated.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/">Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1342757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>credit default swaps</category><category>CreditDefaultSwaps</category><category>featured</category><category>john mccain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>phil gramm</category><category>PhilGramm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Lehman lose as Paulson and Wall Street play a game of chicken?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/13/will-lehman-lose-as-paulson-and-wall-street-play-a-game-of-chick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/13/will-lehman-lose-as-paulson-and-wall-street-play-a-game-of-chick/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/13/will-lehman-lose-as-paulson-and-wall-street-play-a-game-of-chick/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/leh-lehman-brothers-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Hank Paulson is keenly aware that his <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>Goldman Sachs Group</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) and Treasury predecessor, Robert Rubin, helped save the market by encouraging the then-head of the New York Fed to force Wall Street leaders to team up to save Long-Term Capital Management's collapse from taking down the financial markets. Just as George W. Bush needed to recap Iraq, so now does Hank Paulson need to recap that famous meeting in lower Manhattan.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aTuMeSVx29BE&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a> reports that the meeting -- which took place yesterday afternoon -- involved a rogues gallery of Wall Street executives coupled with Paulson and New York Fed president Tim Geithner. The message these regulators delivered was reportedly a simple one: "You need to solve your own problems, and we're not going to provide any more capital." But Wall Street -- as represented by the likes of "<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>Citigroup, Inc.</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c/nys"><font color="#0072bc">C</font></a>)'s Vikram Pandit, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">JPMorgan Chase</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">JPM</font></a>) 's Jamie Dimon, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Morgan Stanley</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><font color="#0072bc">MS</font></a>)'s John Mack, Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mer/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co., Inc</strong>.</font></a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mer/nys"><font color="#0072bc">MER</font></a>) John Thain" -- are convinced that the Fed will blink when it comes to the 158 year old <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>Lehman Brothers Holdings</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys"><font color="#0072bc">LEH</font></a>). </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>Bank of America</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"><font color="#0072bc">BAC</font></a>) reportedly wants to put in a bid for Lehman contingent on getting government help -- such as the $29 billion JPMorgan got in its Bear Stearns acquisition and its nationalization of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>Fannie Mae</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FNM</font></a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>Freddie Mac</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FRE</font></a>). After these two precedents, Paulson now wants to reverse himself. He says Lehman is different because people have known it was in trouble for a long time and it can access the Fed's discount window. But I think this could just be a little show for the President who is worried about how this will look to history. He may not realize that he has already opened the Pandora's Box of moral hazard and can't shut it now.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/13/will-lehman-lose-as-paulson-and-wall-street-play-a-game-of-chick/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Lehman lose as Paulson and Wall Street play a game of chicken?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/13/will-lehman-lose-as-paulson-and-wall-street-play-a-game-of-chick/">Will Lehman lose as Paulson and Wall Street play a game of chicken?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/13/will-lehman-lose-as-paulson-and-wall-street-play-a-game-of-chick/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1313054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/13/will-lehman-lose-as-paulson-and-wall-street-play-a-game-of-chick/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear stearns</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>hank paulson</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>LEH</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>MER</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>morgan stanley ms</category><category>morgan stanley real estate</category><category>MS</category><category>timothy geithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Financials risky but up 26%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/chasing-value-financials-risky-but-up-26/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/chasing-value-financials-risky-but-up-26/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/chasing-value-financials-risky-but-up-26/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nct/" rel="tag">Newcastle Investment (NCT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gkk/" rel="tag">Gramercy Capital (GKK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ewbc/" rel="tag">East West Bancorp (EWBC)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"><span class="change"><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/moneyroll.jpg" alt="" /></strong></span></a>It has been five weeks since I posted <a target="_blank" title="View Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/serious-money-tempting-fate-with-10-financials/">Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials</a>. The results of buying into the following pool of financial stocks at a time when the "hate 'em" factor was at a peak has been tremendous. The over all return has has been 26.3% with eight stocks up and two down.<br /><br />For investors this might have been too speculative; for traders, they are probably grinning from ear to ear. For me -- we will see where we stand next year. As one of my colleagues reminded me, this is the real test, although I think there is reason for optimism.<br /><br />The leader of the pack was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>), up 228%. In the absence of that gain the appreciation would have only been 3.5%. That beats all the indices but is not as dramatic.
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) -- $<span class="change">18.45 <strong>down 63%</strong> from its 52 week high of $49.90; closed yesterday at $19.11, <strong>UP 3.57%</strong><br /></span></li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">Lehman Br Holdings</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">LEH</a>) -- $16.88 <strong>down 75%</strong> from its 52 week high of $67.73<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $16.13, <strong>down 4.44%</strong></span> </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) -- $26.25 <strong>down 67%</strong> from its 52 week high of $79.72<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $27.75, <strong>UP 5.7%</strong></span>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) -- $4.92 <strong>down 93%</strong> from its 52 week high of $68.98<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $16.14, <strong>UP 228%</strong></span>.</li>
    <li><a onclick="addCat(this);" id="14069" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*TRADE</a> (NASDAQ: <a onclick="addCat(this);" id="14069" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC)</a> -- $3.06 <strong>down 84%</strong> from its 52 week high of $19.39<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $3.25, <strong>UP 6.2</strong></span>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/east-west-bancorp-inc/ewbc/nas"> East West Bancorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/east-west-bancorp-inc/ewbc/nas">EWBC</a>) -- $12.46 <strong>down 67%</strong> from its 52 week high of $20.88<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $13.01, <strong>UP 4.4%</strong></span>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gramercy-capital-corp/gkk/nys"> Gramercy Capital</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gramercy-capital-corp/gkk/nys">GKK</a>) -- $6.72 <strong>down 77%</strong> from its 52 week high of $29.45<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $6.80, <strong>UP 1.2%</strong></span>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newcastle-investment-corporation/nct/nys"> Newcastle Investment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newcastle-investment-corporation/nct/nys">NCT</a>) -- $5.88 <strong>down 72%</strong> from its 52 week high of $20.88<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $6.89, <strong>UP 17.18%</strong></span>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys"> Wachovia Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">WB</a>) -- $15.70 <strong>down 70%</strong> from its 52 week high of $53.10<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $16.65, <strong>UP 6%</strong></span>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys"> Washington Mutual</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">WM</a>) -- $4.43 <strong>down 89%</strong> from its 52 week high of $39.48<span class="change">; closed yesterday at $4.24, <strong>down 4.29%</strong></span></li>
</ul>
In my original post I emphasized that you had to buy the pool for safety. During the last month, we have seen many stories about Lehman Brothers' demise or the collapse of a major bank like WaMu or Wachovia, and if that had happened the gains in MBIA would have made up for the total and complete collapse of any one of them. I have no reason to believe this is immanent. I do have reason to believe the opposite. During the last month I bought additional shares of WaMu, one of the two down stocks at $3.50 per share.
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. He writes the columns <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a>. Disclosure: I own shares of MBI, NCT &amp; WM.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/chasing-value-financials-risky-but-up-26/">Chasing Value: Financials risky but up 26%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/chasing-value-financials-risky-but-up-26/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1303330/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/chasing-value-financials-risky-but-up-26/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>Chasing Value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Citigroup Inc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>East West Bancorp</category><category>EastWestBancorp</category><category>ETFC</category><category>ETRADE</category><category>EWBC</category><category>featured</category><category>GKK</category><category>Gramercy Capital</category><category>GramercyCapital</category><category>LEH</category><category>Lehman Br Holdings</category><category>LehmanBrHoldings</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA Inc</category><category>MbiaInc</category><category>MER</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>NCT</category><category>Newcastle Investment</category><category>NewcastleInvestment</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Wachovia Corp</category><category>WachoviaCorp</category><category>Washington Mutual</category><category>WashingtonMutual</category><category>WB</category><category>WM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley latest to buy back Auction Rate Securities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/morgan-stanley-latest-to-buy-back-auction-rate-securities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/morgan-stanley-latest-to-buy-back-auction-rate-securities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/morgan-stanley-latest-to-buy-back-auction-rate-securities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/john-mack-morgan-stanley.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/7519a8365351cb3e81c810afcad89c8a.htm">CNNMoney</a></em> reports that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><strong>Morgan Stanley</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) is the latest bank to buy back its worthless Auction Rate Securities (ARS) from individual investors. With that buyback, Morgan Stanley follows <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/ubs-to-buy-back-19-4-billion-in-auction-rate-securities-who-wi/">in the wake of</a> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c/nys">Citigroup, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c/nys">C</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch &amp; Co., Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mer/nys"><font color="#0072bc">MER</font></a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs/nys">UBS AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs/nys">UBS</a>). </p>
<p>CNNMoney notes that Morgan Stanley said it would offer to repurchase all ARS "held by individuals, charities and small and medium-sized business with accounts of $10 million or less at the bank." Morgan Stanley will begin to start buying back $4.5 billion worth of ARS on September 30th and will "make its best effort to provide liquidity solutions" for institutional investors by the end of 2009. But New York attorney general Andrew Cuomo is not satisfied with Morgan Stanley's proposal.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the list of big ARS issuers that have not settled grows shorter. Here are six holdouts (with their 2007 municipal ARS issuance in parentheses):</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) ($5.2 B) </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a></strong> (NYSE: GS) ($4.3 B) </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) ($3.7 B) </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/morgan-stanley-latest-to-buy-back-auction-rate-securities/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Morgan Stanley latest to buy back Auction Rate Securities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/morgan-stanley-latest-to-buy-back-auction-rate-securities/">Morgan Stanley latest to buy back Auction Rate Securities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/7519a8365351cb3e81c810afcad89c8a.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/morgan-stanley-latest-to-buy-back-auction-rate-securities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1282104/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/12/morgan-stanley-latest-to-buy-back-auction-rate-securities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auction rate securit...</category><category>auction rate securites</category><category>auction rate securities</category><category>AuctionRateSecurit...</category><category>AuctionRateSecurites</category><category>AuctionRateSecurities</category><category>bac</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>cuomo</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>leh</category><category>mer</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>merrill lynch layoffs</category><category>merrill lynch mer</category><category>merrill lynch turmoil</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>MerrillLynchLayoffs</category><category>MerrillLynchMer</category><category>MerrillLynchTurmoil</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>ms</category><category>ubs</category><category>wb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch follows Citigroup in redeeming its Auction Rate Securities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/merrill-lynch-follows-citigroup-in-redeeming-its-auction-rate-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/merrill-lynch-follows-citigroup-in-redeeming-its-auction-rate-se/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/merrill-lynch-follows-citigroup-in-redeeming-its-auction-rate-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/merrill_lynch_bull_robertoschmidt_afp_20070914.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mer/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Merrill Lynch &amp; Co., Inc.</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mer/nys"><font color="#0072bc">MER</font></a>) announced that it would follow <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Citigroup, Inc.</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c/nys"><font color="#0072bc">C</font></a>) in redeeming its Auction Rate Securities (ARS). Unlike Citi -- which plans to redeem <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/cuomo-gets-citi-to-buy-back-7-billion-worth-of-auction-rate-sec/">$7 billion worth of ARS by November</a> -- Merrill will take its sweet time. According to <em><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/merrill-lynch-buy-auction-rate/story.aspx?guid=%7B00A21EDE-D9DC-4D47-B8E7-73E1D9C5FE4C%7D&amp;dist=hppr">MarketWatch</a></em>, from January 15, 2009, and through January 15, 2010, Merrill will "offer to buy at par" $10 billion worth of ARS it sold to 30,000 retail clients.</p>
<p>This is good news and it should get the ball rolling. But there are still at least $300 billion ARS which are not yet redeemed. The list of issuers reads like a who's who of the banking world. For instance, the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121806922599718905.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Wall Street Journal</a></em> reports that the top 10 municipal ARS issuers at the end of 2007 were as follows:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Citigroup ($6.7 B) </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) ($5.2 B) </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) ($5.2 B) </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a></strong> (NYSE: GS) ($4.3 B) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs/nys"><font color="#0072bc">UBS AG</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs/nys"><font color="#0072bc">UBS</font></a>) ($4.2 B) </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/merrill-lynch-follows-citigroup-in-redeeming-its-auction-rate-se/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Merrill Lynch follows Citigroup in redeeming its Auction Rate Securities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/merrill-lynch-follows-citigroup-in-redeeming-its-auction-rate-se/">Merrill Lynch follows Citigroup in redeeming its Auction Rate Securities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/merrill-lynch-follows-citigroup-in-redeeming-its-auction-rate-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1278632/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/merrill-lynch-follows-citigroup-in-redeeming-its-auction-rate-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auction rate</category><category>auction rate securit...</category><category>auction rate securities</category><category>AuctionRate</category><category>AuctionRateSecurit...</category><category>AuctionRateSecurities</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>citigroup inc. c</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.C</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>merrill lynch mer</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>MerrillLynchMer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Citi fall victim to the stadium-naming curse?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/citigroupumbrella.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/20/sports/baseball/20sandomir.html?ref=baseball">New York Times</a></em> reports that Citigroup (NYSE: C) plans to commit $400 million to its naming rights deal for the stadium of the New York Mets. I say stop this deal! </p>
<p>Why? There are so many examples of companies that got into trouble after they named stadiums after themselves. In Boston, the stadium where the New England Patriots play was named after Gillette -- but Gillette doesn't exist anymore -- Procter &amp; Gamble (NYSE: PG) bought it in <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2005/01/28/news/fortune500/pg_gillette/">2005</a>. And we had the Fleet Center, where the Boston Celtics play -- but Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) bought Fleet in <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/27/national/main580134.shtml">2003</a>. And we also had the Tweeter Center, a concert venue -- named after Tweeter Home Enterprises which filed for bankruptcy last <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2007/06/12/tweeter_seeks_bankruptcy_protection/">June</a>. Fortunately, Boston's other world championship team, the Red Sox, has the good sense to deny naming rights to any company for its Fenway Park.</p>
<p>Now for Citi. According to the <em>Times</em>, it made its 20-year deal for the Mets naming rights back in November 2006 under previous CEO, Chuck Prince, after netting $5.3 billion in 2006's third quarter. But in the past three quarters, it has lost $17 billion - including a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/great-news-citi-loses-2-5-billion/">$2.5 billion loss</a> reported on Friday. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Citi fall victim to the stadium-naming curse?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/">Will Citi fall victim to the stadium-naming curse?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1261482/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank of america</category><category>bank of america 500</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>BankOfAmerica500</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>citigroup inc. c</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.C</category><category>gillette</category><category>gillette stadium</category><category>GilletteStadium</category><category>mets</category><category>mets de nueva york</category><category>mets nueva york</category><category>metsdenuevayork</category><category>metsfans</category><category>MetsNuevaYork</category><category>procter</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>procter gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>ProcterGamble</category><category>tweeter</category><category>tweeter home enterta...</category><category>TweeterHomeEnterta...</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Citi's Pandit last the year?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/can-citis-pandit-last-the-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/can-citis-pandit-last-the-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/can-citis-pandit-last-the-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/p_pandit.png" /> The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/business/15citi.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">New York Times</a></em> reports that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Citigroup</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"><font color="#0072bc">C</font></a>) CEO Vikram Pandit is trying to buck up his troops with speeches on values. Since taking over last December 12, Citi's stock has lost over 50% of its value and has accumulated $45 billion in losses in the last year.</p>
<p>A few days after he started as CEO, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/buy-citi-when-it-hits-15/">I suggested</a> that Citi might be a buy if it hits $15. I am sorry to say it, but I was wrong. We're at $15 today and I would not buy more at this price. With analysts expecting Citi to lose <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?Symbol=C">31 cents</a> a share when it reports on Friday, it seems to me that the downside risks to the stock weigh heavily. That's because it's missed estimates the last two quarters and Zacks thinks it could lose as much as <strong><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20080714006058&amp;newsLang=en">51 cents a share</a></strong>. But what worries me the most is what the <em>Times</em> reported about what appears to be a missing sense of urgency about how to fix Citi.</p>
<p>It describes how he spent time at a meeting in Armonk, NY, pushing "<em>60 top managers to build on his seven rules, which he unveiled in the last few weeks. Those rules include items like "client connectivity," "transparency" and "product excellence."</em>" Not surprisingly, in my view, the <em>Times</em> reports that "some Citigroup insiders roll their eyes at what they see as dull platitudes."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/can-citis-pandit-last-the-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Citi's Pandit last the year?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/can-citis-pandit-last-the-year/">Can Citi's Pandit last the year?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/business/15citi.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/can-citis-pandit-last-the-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1257094/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/can-citis-pandit-last-the-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>featured</category><category>vikram</category><category>vikram pandit</category><category>VikramPandit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Five stable stocks for troubled times]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/serious-money-5-stable-stocks-for-troubled-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/serious-money-5-stable-stocks-for-troubled-times/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/serious-money-5-stable-stocks-for-troubled-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cb/" rel="tag">Chubb Corp (CB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hnp/" rel="tag">Huaneng Power Intl ADS (HNP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/teva/" rel="tag">Teva Pharm Indus ADR (TEVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/isrg/" rel="tag">Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/red_cross.jpg" alt="" />Six months of 2008 are now behind us and the stock market has not been a friendly place to most investors. Stability that was once found in household names that were industry giants is gone, and they have now been brought to their knees. </p>
<p>Many of them were the stocks we might have looked to in the past for stability, so you can be sure I put forward my five candidates with a little trepidation, but forward I go anyway. First a little review is in order. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) dropped from around $53 per share last year to around $30 in January and we can buy it today for around $17. Even at that price <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) has downgraded it to a sell and thinks there is more bad news to come. Citigroup was the largest bank in the world. Not any more. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) was the largest car maker in the world. That was before the stock tumbled from $43 to its current $11 range. A crushing blow to long time investors hoping that someone in the company could stop the ship from sinking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/serious-money-5-stable-stocks-for-troubled-times/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Five stable stocks for troubled times</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/serious-money-5-stable-stocks-for-troubled-times/">Serious Money: Five stable stocks for troubled times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/serious-money-5-stable-stocks-for-troubled-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1242326/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/serious-money-5-stable-stocks-for-troubled-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>BSC</category><category>C</category><category>CB</category><category>Chubb Corp</category><category>ChubbCorp</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>GS</category><category>HNP</category><category>Huaneng Power Intl ADS</category><category>HuanengPowerIntlAds</category><category>Intuitive Surgical Inc ISRG</category><category>IntuitiveSurgicalIncIsrg</category><category>ISRG</category><category>LEH</category><category>Lehman Bros</category><category>LehmanBros</category><category>MER</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>MS</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>TEVA</category><category>Teva Pharm Indus ADR</category><category>TevaPharmIndusAdr</category><category>Walt Disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><category>xcel energy</category><category>XcelEnergy</category><category>XEL</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Google's plans for cellphone delayed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/newspaper-wrap-up-googles-plans-for-cellphone-delayed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/newspaper-wrap-up-googles-plans-for-cellphone-delayed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/newspaper-wrap-up-googles-plans-for-cellphone-delayed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Last November, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and 30 partners were said be developing a new type of handset using Android that was expected to revolutionize the industry. The first new phones were expected to be available in this year's second half but are now slated for the fourth quarter the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121418837707895947.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported.</li>
    <li>According to people familiar with the situation, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121416925522495095.html"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Incorporated</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) will make sharp cuts in its investment banking division this week.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121399530093392841.html"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/live-nation-inc/lyv/nys">Live Nation Inc's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/live-nation-inc/lyv/nys">LYV</a>) Chairman, Michael Cohl, stepped down down as a director and executive to end the strategy feud with CEO Michael Rapino. over how to pursue the "360 deals" with music superstars.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4b0e96b2-4093-11dd-bd48-0000779fd2ac.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported that there are worries that investment banks will accelerate the pace of their layoffs this summer, after it became known that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">The Goldman Sachs Group Inc </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) gave pink slips to workers in its investment banking division last week. Goldman is now expected to lay off up to 10% of the workers at the division.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>New Jersey put its $150M center for stem cell research on hold, the <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/06/support_fades_for_stem_cell_re.html"><em>Star Ledger</em></a> reported, eight months after ground was broken on the project.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/newspaper-wrap-up-googles-plans-for-cellphone-delayed/">Newspaper wrap-up: Google's plans for cellphone delayed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/newspaper-wrap-up-googles-plans-for-cellphone-delayed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1233575/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/newspaper-wrap-up-googles-plans-for-cellphone-delayed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>citigroup inc. c</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.C</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google phone</category><category>GooglePhone</category><category>GS</category><category>layoffs</category><category>Live Nation</category><category>LiveNation</category><category>LYV</category><category>Michael Cohl</category><category>Michael Rapino</category><category>MichaelCohl</category><category>MichaelRapino</category><category>stem cell</category><category>stem cell research</category><category>stem cells</category><category>StemCell</category><category>StemCellResearch</category><category>StemCells</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:47:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
