<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Cautious Euphoria Continues (AMZN, APOL, CRY, GFRE, HD, TM)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/closing-bell-cautious-euphoria-continues-amzn-apol-cry-gfre/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/closing-bell-cautious-euphoria-continues-amzn-apol-cry-gfre/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/closing-bell-cautious-euphoria-continues-amzn-apol-cry-gfre/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />Consumer Confidence saw a huge drop for March, but that failed to hurt the markets as it was largely expected. Housing prices continued south according to national housing survey data from Case Shiller. International stock markets saw a mixed bag on Tuesday, but U.S. investors continued to sit there, buying stocks. Maybe the real catalyst is the fact that very few companies have formally lowered guidance despite the turmoil. <br />
<br />
Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow Jones: 12,279.01 + 81.13 (0.67%)</p>
S&amp;P500: 1,319.44 +9.25 (0.71%)<br />
<br />
Nasdaq: 2,756.89 +26.21 (0.96%)<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/closing-bell-cautious-euphoria-continues-amzn-apol-cry-gfre/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Cautious Euphoria Continues (AMZN, APOL, CRY, GFRE, HD, TM)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/closing-bell-cautious-euphoria-continues-amzn-apol-cry-gfre/">Closing Bell: Cautious Euphoria Continues (AMZN, APOL, CRY, GFRE, HD, TM)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/closing-bell-cautious-euphoria-continues-amzn-apol-cry-gfre/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19896271/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/closing-bell-cautious-euphoria-continues-amzn-apol-cry-gfre/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMZN</category><category>APOL</category><category>closing bell</category><category>CRY</category><category>GFRE</category><category>HD</category><category>stocks</category><category>TM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing bell: No spark from consumer sentiment (RIMM, AAPL, UAUA, AMR)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/closing-bell-no-spark-from-consumer-sentiment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/closing-bell-no-spark-from-consumer-sentiment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/closing-bell-no-spark-from-consumer-sentiment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" />Bad housing numbers did not do much to hurt the market yesterday and good consumer sentiment figures did not help today. The Reuters/University of Michigan poll for late September yielded a figure of 73.5. That is the highest number since early in 2008. The data may mean that consumers believe the recession is over. Traders did not appear to be heartened, and a poor report on durable goods had the prevailing effect on trading all day. The Commerce Department said orders for goods expected to last at least three years fell 2.4%.<br /><br />Here are the unofficial numbers:<br /><br />
<p>DJIA: 9666.48 -40.96 (-0.42%)<br /></p>
<p>NASDAQ: 2090.92 -16.69 (-0.79%)<br /></p>
<p>S&amp;P 500: 1044.44 -6.34 (-0.6%)<br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/closing-bell-no-spark-from-consumer-sentiment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing bell: No spark from consumer sentiment (RIMM, AAPL, UAUA, AMR)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/closing-bell-no-spark-from-consumer-sentiment/">Closing bell: No spark from consumer sentiment (RIMM, AAPL, UAUA, AMR)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/closing-bell-no-spark-from-consumer-sentiment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19174416/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/closing-bell-no-spark-from-consumer-sentiment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AMR</category><category>closing bell</category><category>RIMM</category><category>UAUA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Was that a win or loss? BUD is no more; GLW, FSLR, HPQ, HD]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/closing-bell-was-that-a-win-or-loss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/closing-bell-was-that-a-win-or-loss/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/closing-bell-was-that-a-win-or-loss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/glw/" rel="tag">Corning Inc (GLW)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" />Today was another one of those days where it was hard to tell if the market was up. The market gapped up and then posted a great morning rally, and then proceeded to give back most of the gains from noon until late in the afternoon. Housing was dismal, producer prices were down, and Bernanke and Paulson testified about the TARP usage. <br /><br />Below are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<div class="volume">
<div class="percentIncr" id="leftnavprcS1">DJIA: 8,424.75<span class="charSpace2"></span> +151.17<span class="charSpace2"></span> +1.83%</div>
</div>
<div class="volume">
<div class="percentIncr" id="leftnavprcS1">NASDAQ: 1,483.27<span class="charSpace2"></span> +1.22<span class="charSpace2"></span> +0.08%</div>
</div>
<div class="volume">
<div class="percentIncr" id="leftnavprcS1">S&amp;P 500: 859.12<span class="charSpace2"></span> +8.37<span class="charSpace2"></span> +0.98%<br /></div>
</div>
Analyst Calls: <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/11/early-bird-an-3.html">Top Upgrades</a> and <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/11/early-bird-an-2.html">Top Downgrades</a><br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys ">Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys ">BUD</a>) is no more..... The merger was completed today with InBev and the stock will now be European listed and be called Anheuser-Busch InBev. Shareholders of common stock receive $70.00 per share in cash as part of this $52 billion merger.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/corning-incorporated/glw/nys">Corning Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/corning-incorporated/glw/nys">GLW</a>) gave disappointing LCD panel guidance which was "below" the $1.1 to $1.2 billion in revenues previously offered and "at the low end of below" the $0.20 to $0.28 EPS range previously offered just a few weeks ago. Shares were down 7% right before the the close.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/closing-bell-was-that-a-win-or-loss/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Was that a win or loss? BUD is no more; GLW, FSLR, HPQ, HD</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/closing-bell-was-that-a-win-or-loss/">Closing Bell: Was that a win or loss? BUD is no more; GLW, FSLR, HPQ, HD</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/closing-bell-was-that-a-win-or-loss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1376097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/closing-bell-was-that-a-win-or-loss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BUD</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>FSLR</category><category>GLW</category><category>HD</category><category>HPQ</category><category>Inbev</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: The bears wore their Crocs to work]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/25/closing-bell-the-bears-wore-their-crocs-to-work/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/25/closing-bell-the-bears-wore-their-crocs-to-work/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/25/closing-bell-the-bears-wore-their-crocs-to-work/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnpr/" rel="tag">Juniper Networks (JNPR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crox/" rel="tag">Crocs Inc (CROX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/andrew_in_crocs.jpg" alt="" />If you were looking for another hard day of profit taking on a summer Friday, the markets escaped the hangman. A barely positive durable goods of big ticket items was enough to send the pessimists to the showers and gave the bulls a little more ammo. Throw in an oil ticker showing a drop of more than $2.00 to almost $123.00 per barrel and that's all that was needed. Look at bond yields and you'll see we gave back almost all of yesterday's move. <br /><br />Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />DJIA 11368.33 (+19.05)<br />S&amp;P500 1257.65 (+5.11)<br />NASDAQ 2310.53 (+30.42)<br />10YR T-NOTE 4.111% (+0.095%)<br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/top-pre-mark-11.html">TOP ANALYST UPGRADES</a><br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/top-pre-mark-10.html">TOP ANALYST DOWNGRADES<br /></a><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/short-sellers-t.html">Select Short Sales Data</a><br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arch-coal-incorporated/aci/nys">Arch Coal</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arch-coal-incorporated/aci/nys">ACI</a>) tripled earnings posted EPS of $0.78 vs. $0.64 estimates. The stock was up more than 3% in pre-open but was up almost 9% at $55.45 in the final minutes of the day. <br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crocs-inc/crox/nas">Crocs Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crocs-inc/crox/nas">CROX</a>) led the garbage stocks after a very <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/crocs-stock-now.html">ugly earnings warning</a> last night. It now sees sales for all of 2008 modestly lower than 2007 and is now only targeting a break-even result for 2008. Retailers were noted as keeping inventory re-orders at low levels, which is hard to blame them considering the ugly shoe fad has already started its workdown. Shares were down 44% at $4.99 after shares had already sold of more than 80% from 52-week highs.<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys"><br /></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/25/closing-bell-the-bears-wore-their-crocs-to-work/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: The bears wore their Crocs to work</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/25/closing-bell-the-bears-wore-their-crocs-to-work/">Closing Bell: The bears wore their Crocs to work</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/25/closing-bell-the-bears-wore-their-crocs-to-work/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1267328/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/25/closing-bell-the-bears-wore-their-crocs-to-work/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aci</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>crox</category><category>dal</category><category>goog</category><category>jnpr</category><category>wynn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Laura Bush rings closing bell in a triumph of pink]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/18/laura-bush-rings-closing-bell-in-a-triumph-of-pink/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/18/laura-bush-rings-closing-bell-in-a-triumph-of-pink/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/18/laura-bush-rings-closing-bell-in-a-triumph-of-pink/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/pink_inside_knittinkitten_dress.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />According to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115858212268766204.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, Laura Bush was wearing</a> "a pink skirt-suit" when she rang the closing bell for the New York Stock Exchange today, marking the first time, ever, that a First Lady has rung the closing bell. <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-8.html">The White House website says brightly </a>that her visit was made to "symbolize the vital contribution that women bring to a growing global economy."</p>
<p>And what better way to symbolize women in economy, everywhere, than to wear pink?</p>
<p>The <em>Journal</em> pointed out that she pronounced the floor trading "interesting" after receiving a description of the NYSE's workings from Spear Leeds &amp; Kellogg.</p>
<p>Laura Bush has certainly <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/politics/ny-usbush144890694sep14,0,2864220.story?coll=ny-lipolitics-print">worked hard for women's rights</a> in her time as First Lady, but has labored much of this second term deep in the shadow of her husband. She's visiting New York City by herself this week, attending a conference on global literacy, accepting an award, and talking at the Clinton Global Initiative. She'll also talk at the UN about Burma's humanitarian crisis. </p>
<p>The history-making step at the NYSE seems at once flamboyant and girlish, feminista and feminine. Why ring the bell now? <em>Why wear pink?</em> As a woman in business, I'm at once bemused and a little insulted at this would-be economic role model. Will anyone remember Laura's actions as a mark on the timeline for feminism, or women, or pink -- or is it just a trivia footnote that will be quickly forgotten by all but the most dedicated Bushophiles? What do you think?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/18/laura-bush-rings-closing-bell-in-a-triumph-of-pink/">Laura Bush rings closing bell in a triumph of pink</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/18/laura-bush-rings-closing-bell-in-a-triumph-of-pink/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/671083/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/18/laura-bush-rings-closing-bell-in-a-triumph-of-pink/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bush</category><category>bush rang closing bell</category><category>BushRangClosingBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>first lady</category><category>FirstLady</category><category>history</category><category>laur</category><category>laura</category><category>laura bush</category><category>LauraBush</category><category>ring closing bell</category><category>ring the bell</category><category>ring the closing bell</category><category>RingClosingBell</category><category>RingTheBell</category><category>RingTheClosingBell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 09-14-06: singing a new Zune]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/microsoft-after-the-bell-09-14-06-singing-a-new-zune/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/microsoft-after-the-bell-09-14-06-singing-a-new-zune/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/microsoft-after-the-bell-09-14-06-singing-a-new-zune/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/msft_chart_09142006.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" />Everyone's singing a new Zune today following the unveiling of Microsoft's iPod competitor (n&eacute;e <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/16/ipod-killer-from-microsoft-the-rumor-is-true/">killer</a>), and that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/microsoft-zune-brown-and-beautiful-but-how-much/">Zune is brown</a>. While no one seemed quite sure, the reaction was generally positive; <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1240">watchers thought the music sharing option</a> was <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/14/zune-is-here/">rather brilliant</a>, and the <a href="http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2006/09/microsofts_zune.php">interface intuitive and simple</a>.</p>
<p>The question on everyone's minds is, still, how much? Guesses tend to end up around $299.</p>
<p>Microsoft investors seemed pleased, and drove the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas/charts?freq=1">stock up 35 cents, or 1.35%, to a comfortable $26.33</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/microsoft-after-the-bell-09-14-06-singing-a-new-zune/">Microsoft after the bell 09-14-06: singing a new Zune</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/microsoft-after-the-bell-09-14-06-singing-a-new-zune/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/669326/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/microsoft-after-the-bell-09-14-06-singing-a-new-zune/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft after the bell</category><category>microsoft zune</category><category>MicrosoftAfterTheBell</category><category>MicrosoftZune</category><category>msft</category><category>msft after the bell</category><category>MsftAfterTheBell</category><category>zune</category><category>zune announcement</category><category>ZuneAnnouncement</category><category>zuneful</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner after the bell 09-14-06: quiet day, punishing Cramer?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/time-warner-after-the-bell-09-14-06-quiet-day-punishing-cramer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/time-warner-after-the-bell-09-14-06-quiet-day-punishing-cramer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/time-warner-after-the-bell-09-14-06-quiet-day-punishing-cramer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img id="vimage_2" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/twx_chart_091406_m.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />This was actually a quiet day for Time Warner (TWX), even with the stock down 0.4% to close at $16.91. There was some good news for TWX when <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/time-warner-cuts-its-stake-in-time-warner-telecom/">Time Warner Telecom (TWTC) announced</a> that TWX and affiliates were selling some 27.5 million shares. This is actually good as it allows TWX to focus on its own entities a tad more, and allows the company to unlock some of the hidden value in its assets. That won't generate enough cash that the bond rating firms will take much note, but it won't be bad for them at all either. The volume was pretty normal, with 21.9 million shares traded compared to an average daily volume of 20.5 million.<br /><br />The move probably wasn't even a "Punish Cramer" after <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/13/cramer-recommends-buy-time-warner-twx/">he said "BUY TWX</a>" yesterday because of how his call on Hansen (HANS) went so poorly in the immediate day after. It seems that the stock was just doing a healthy pullback because of overbought indicators. That isn't indicative of a bunch of short sellers and it isn't indicative of a big institutional investor or key insider bailing out. This is just some clean profit taking on overbought conditions that we had previously telegraphed. When stocks go up seven out of eight or nine days, that happens.<br /><br />Options activity was quiet a day ahead of expiration date, so there wasn't any added options volatility causing any artificial moves. I was shocked that I had to go all the way out to the January 2008 contracts just to find contracts that posted over 1,000 traded on the day at 3:15 PM. The JAN08 $15 PUTS traded 5,495 contracts as of that time. Someone made a highly speculative bet in an options trade by purchasing 1,362 of the JAN08 $30 CALLS for a $0.05. That is someone looking for a highly leveraged trade that they will make a fortune on if the stock starts to rally significantly.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/time-warner-after-the-bell-09-14-06-quiet-day-punishing-cramer/">Time Warner after the bell 09-14-06: quiet day, punishing Cramer?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/time-warner-after-the-bell-09-14-06-quiet-day-punishing-cramer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/669213/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/time-warner-after-the-bell-09-14-06-quiet-day-punishing-cramer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>cramer</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mad money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>punish cramer</category><category>PunishCramer</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner closing bell</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerClosingBell</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner after the bell 08-01-06: down 1.5% on earnings tension]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/time-warner-after-the-bell-08-01-06-down-1-5-on-earnings-tensi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/time-warner-after-the-bell-08-01-06-down-1-5-on-earnings-tensi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/time-warner-after-the-bell-08-01-06-down-1-5-on-earnings-tensi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>Time Warner shareholders have been biting their collective nails for the past few weeks, wondering what would happen with the second quarter earnings, due out tomorrow morning before the bell. What news will accompany the financials? Will AOL subscriptions be down yet again? Will the board be doing something radical: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/">offering AOL emails for fr</a>ee, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/28/aol-spin-off-in-the-works/">spinning off a portion of the company</a>, or (who knows) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/31/aol-gets-youtube-fever/">creating yet another video sharing site</a>?</p>
<p>The nails were bitten down another <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=twx&amp;exch=USA">1.52% today in anticipation as the stock fell 25 cents to $16.25</a>, and down a few more cents in after-hours trading. This isn't cause for alarm, though: the price is several ticks away from the 52-week low of $15.70. Keep posted tomorrow as we'll be live blogging the earnings call at 8:30 a.m. EDT.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/time-warner-after-the-bell-08-01-06-down-1-5-on-earnings-tensi/">Time Warner after the bell 08-01-06: down 1.5% on earnings tension</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/time-warner-after-the-bell-08-01-06-down-1-5-on-earnings-tensi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/649593/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/time-warner-after-the-bell-08-01-06-down-1-5-on-earnings-tensi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$16.25</category><category>16.25</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner close</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerClose</category><category>twx</category><category>twx close</category><category>TwxClose</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo after the bell 07-18-06: up 1% on hopes about earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/yahoo-after-the-bell-07-18-06-up-1-on-hopes-about-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/yahoo-after-the-bell-07-18-06-up-1-on-hopes-about-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/yahoo-after-the-bell-07-18-06-up-1-on-hopes-about-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="yahoo three month stock chart as of 07-17-06" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/yhoo_chart_3mo_071706.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Investors are a hopeful kind of bird. Yahoo! stock, along with many in the tech sector, has been in the doldrums as of late. Earnings are coming out in about an hour, though, and this makes the investor bird preen its feathers and buy in advance of the announcement. Despite intraday lows that were down signficantly from yesterday's close, Yahoo! <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=yhoo&amp;exch=USA">ended the day at $32.17, up 33 cents or 1.04%</a>.</p>
<p>But Piper Jaffray, among other analysts, are predicting good things, <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/newsanalysis/technet/10297151.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA">including the consensus 11 cents per share profit </a>(down from 13 cents in the year-ago quarter) and positive news in the search ad revenue department. Check back at 5 p.m. Eastern, when we'll be liveblogging <a href="http://yhoo.client.shareholder.com/calendar.cfm?CalendarID=2">the earnings report</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/yahoo-after-the-bell-07-18-06-up-1-on-hopes-about-earnings/">Yahoo after the bell 07-18-06: up 1% on hopes about earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/yahoo-after-the-bell-07-18-06-up-1-on-hopes-about-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/644329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/yahoo-after-the-bell-07-18-06-up-1-on-hopes-about-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10q</category><category>2nd quarter</category><category>2nd quarter earnings</category><category>2ndQuarter</category><category>2ndQuarterEarnings</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings release</category><category>earnings report</category><category>EarningsRelease</category><category>EarningsReport</category><category>second quarter</category><category>second quarter earnings</category><category>SecondQuarter</category><category>SecondQuarterEarnings</category><category>stock up</category><category>StockUp</category><category>yahoo earnings</category><category>YahooEarnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay after the bell 07-13-06: Apple drives stock to near 3-year low]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/ebay-after-the-bell-07-13-06-apple-drives-stock-to-near-3-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/ebay-after-the-bell-07-13-06-apple-drives-stock-to-near-3-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/ebay-after-the-bell-07-13-06-apple-drives-stock-to-near-3-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_2" alt="ebay three-year stock chart 07-13-06" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/ebay_chart_3yr_071306.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Poor eBay. Surely the recent slide is not all its own fault. In fact, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115271212919604611.html?mod=hps_us_my_companies">tech stocks (and especially Apple) are being blamed for its decline today</a>. Yet it's special (<em>bad </em>special) that I had to dust off a three-year chart to show you today.</p>
<p>Just gaze at that. Ick! eBay is, indeed, at a low not seen for nearly three years, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/detailedquotes?exch=USA&amp;sym=EBAY&amp;dr=36&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1">closing today at $26.58, down 64 cents or 2.35% on the day</a>. It's not all Apple's fault, to be sure; investors are worried with <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/paypals-brain-drain-is-it-a-signal-of-bigger-problems-at-ebay/">concerns over the company's management trickle-out</a> (it's not enough to be called an "exodus" -- yet), and perhaps there is some lingering competitive concern over the <a href="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/12/christies-will-not-be-using-ebay-to-go-online/">move by Christie's to hold its own auctions</a>, or <a href="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/is-paypal-gearing-up-to-fight-googles-checkout/">worries over Google Checkout</a>. Either way, times are not the best for the company's stock.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/ebay-after-the-bell-07-13-06-apple-drives-stock-to-near-3-year/">eBay after the bell 07-13-06: Apple drives stock to near 3-year low</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/ebay-after-the-bell-07-13-06-apple-drives-stock-to-near-3-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/642804/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/13/ebay-after-the-bell-07-13-06-apple-drives-stock-to-near-3-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2-year low</category><category>2-yearLow</category><category>3-year low</category><category>3-yearLow</category><category>52-week low</category><category>52-weekLow</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>ebay</category><category>ebay close</category><category>EbayClose</category><category>low</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 05-30-2006: whither $450 Vista?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-30-2006-whither-450-vista/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-30-2006-whither-450-vista/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-30-2006-whither-450-vista/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img alt="microsoft chart 05-30-2006" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/msft_chart_05302006_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Microsoft joined the rest of the BloggingStocks universe today, closing down significantly. For MSFT, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=USA&amp;sym=MSFT&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1">losing 57 cents took the stock down 2.4%, to $23.15</a>, and it was despite an opening bell spike.</p>
<p>None of the market seemed to be much affected by individual company news today, although there was a lot of buzz today about Mr. Softie, with a number of MSFT watchers <a href="http://msft.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/steve-ballmer-not-ignoring-shareholders/">eager to see what Steve Ballmer will say tomorrow morning in his uncharacteristic chat with investors</a>. And later this afternoon, news of <a href="http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/4463/53/">pricing for Microsoft Vista ($450 is the word on the 'net)</a>&nbsp;had lots of bloggers biting, wondering whether it was worth your while to pay more for your operating system than your computer (despite the bells and whistles everyone's raving over). <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/30/windows-vista-ultimate-450-us/">Ryan Block at Engadget muses</a>, "when you consider the fact that the single-license full install retail MSRP of XP Pro is still $300 US, it's not too drastically unrealistic. Don't get us wrong, we're not exactly endorsing snapping up operating systems that cost more than the machines they run on but, you know, it is <em>Ultimate</em> freaking <a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=vista">Vista</a>, dude."</p>
<p>The reports on Office Ulimate MSRP: $679.&nbsp;That's some expensive PowerPoint slides. Maybe I should sign up for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/microsoft-seeking-to-tap-a-billion-new-consumers/">pay-as-you-go</a>. Dude. And that brings up an excellent question: if the geeks are willing to pay, will corporations follow suit?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-30-2006-whither-450-vista/">Microsoft after the bell 05-30-2006: whither $450 Vista?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 May 2006 18:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/4463/53/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-30-2006-whither-450-vista/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/623329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-30-2006-whither-450-vista/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$450</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>closing price</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>ClosingPrice</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft vista</category><category>MicrosoftVista</category><category>msft</category><category>msft at close</category><category>MsftAtClose</category><category>vista</category><category>vista $450</category><category>vista 450</category><category>Vista$450</category><category>Vista450</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 18:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 05-23-06: candy $0.75, iPod $199]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/apple-after-the-bell-05-23-06-candy-0-75-ipod-199/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/apple-after-the-bell-05-23-06-candy-0-75-ipod-199/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/apple-after-the-bell-05-23-06-candy-0-75-ipod-199/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img alt="apple chart 05-23-2006" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/apple_chart_05232006.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />What's the problem with iPods? Supply <em>has</em> been an issue, with customers and retailers&nbsp;joining together to bicker over that last iPod Nano come holiday time. If Apple has anything to do with it, next Christmas it will be a little easier. That is,&nbsp;if you're a sucker for anything that rolls out of a vending machine.&nbsp;It seems as if there will&nbsp;be 180 of the&nbsp;<a href="http://palmaddict.typepad.com/palmaddicts/2006/05/macys_to_bring_.html">new Zoom @ Macy's vending machines</a> -- scheduled to stock iPods -- in stores by the fall. I, for one, would much rather buy the <a href="http://aapl.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/apple-and-nike-team-up-and-launch-nike-ipod-sport-kit/">new $29 Nike+iPod Sport</a> in a vending machine in one of my fave running spots. Now<em> there's</em> an interesting business plan!</p>
<p>If investors heard about the new vending machines, though, they weren't impressed. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=NAS&amp;from=lookup&amp;sym=E%3ANAS%3AAAPL">AAPL was down 23 cents to $63.15</a> in the same end-of-day malaise that struck the rest of the market. It's a pity, as AAPL opened extremely strong, up to $65.19 in the first minutes of the trading day on below-average volume.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/apple-after-the-bell-05-23-06-candy-0-75-ipod-199/">Apple after the bell 05-23-06: candy $0.75, iPod $199</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 May 2006 18:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://palmaddict.typepad.com/palmaddicts/2006/05/macys_to_bring_.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/apple-after-the-bell-05-23-06-candy-0-75-ipod-199/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/621216/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/apple-after-the-bell-05-23-06-candy-0-75-ipod-199/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>aapl closing</category><category>AaplClosing</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>appl</category><category>appl closing</category><category>ApplClosing</category><category>apple</category><category>apple closed at</category><category>apple closing</category><category>AppleClosedAt</category><category>AppleClosing</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod vending</category><category>IpodVending</category><category>vending</category><category>vending machine</category><category>VendingMachine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 18:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 05-23-2006: Vista confidence? Markets says, 'No']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-23-2006-vista-confidence-markets-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-23-2006-vista-confidence-markets-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-23-2006-vista-confidence-markets-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img alt="microsoft chart 05-23-2006" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/msft_chart_05232006.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Confident about Vista release dates? That's what Microsoft "Windows guru" <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-05-23T185135Z_01_N232459_RTRIDST_0_TECH-MICROSOFT-VISTA-URGENT.XML">Jim Allchin told Reuters in an interview today</a>. He's the co-president of the company's Platforms &amp; Services Division, and the one responsible for Vista, the upcoming operating system update. The market has been highly skeptical of Microsoft's ability to release the software on time; ever since <a href="http://msft.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/">Gartner released a report indicating Vista would hit the shelves months behind</a> schedule.</p>
<p>Evidently, the market remains skeptical. MSFT was way&nbsp;up in the morning to a respectable $23.38, but plunged at the end of the day in a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/23/markets/markets_newyork/index.htm?source=aol_quote">market-wide sell-off</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=USA&amp;sym=MSFT&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1">ending down nine cents at $22.79</a>. Evidently, Allchin's confidence didn't have much sway in the face of uncertainty over commodity prices and, perhaps, the continuing incredulity of MSFT investors.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-23-2006-vista-confidence-markets-s/">Microsoft after the bell 05-23-2006: Vista confidence? Markets says, 'No'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 May 2006 16:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-05-23T185135Z_01_N232459_RTRIDST_0_TECH-MICROSOFT-VISTA-URGENT.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-23-2006-vista-confidence-markets-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/621152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-23-2006-vista-confidence-markets-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$22.79</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>close down</category><category>CloseDown</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>down</category><category>end of day</category><category>EndOfDay</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft after the bell</category><category>msft close</category><category>msft closed down</category><category>MsftAfterTheBell</category><category>MsftClose</category><category>MsftClosedDown</category><category>vista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 16:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 05-19-06: why so low, Softie?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-19-06-why-so-low-softie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-19-06-why-so-low-softie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-19-06-why-so-low-softie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img alt="microsoft stock chart 05-19-2006" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/msft_chart_05192006.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Ah, poor Softie. Where have you gone wrong? In a day when the market was generally up, Microsoft flirted with its new two-year low, closing down 27 cents to $22.56, a drop of 1.18%. MSFT took a dive in the opening minutes and never recovered. Why so low, Softie?</p>
<p>The volume was relatively average, so all we can do is speculate. Many Apple watchers were <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/05/19/not-all-macs-meet-vista-requirements/">surprised today to discover</a> that the consumer versions of the new MacBook and the little Mac Mini don't meet the minimum requirements for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/">Microsoft Vista when it's released</a> ... sometime. Is the <a href="http://blogs.pcworld.com/tipsandtweaks/archives/002096.html">checklist for Vista so draconian</a> that investors can't stomach the pain of having to purchase a special graphics adaptor? Must be.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-19-06-why-so-low-softie/">Microsoft after the bell 05-19-06: why so low, Softie?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 May 2006 19:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-19-06-why-so-low-softie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620136/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-19-06-why-so-low-softie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>macbook</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>vista</category><category>wrap-up</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 19:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 05-18-06: walloped by end-of-day selloff]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/18/apple-after-the-bell-05-18-06-walloped-by-end-of-day-selloff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/18/apple-after-the-bell-05-18-06-walloped-by-end-of-day-selloff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/18/apple-after-the-bell-05-18-06-walloped-by-end-of-day-selloff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img alt="apple at the bell 05182006" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/apple_chart_05182006.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Apple was plugging along today, basking in the glow of its <a href="http://aapl.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/">new (and black) MacBook</a>, and Steve Jobs was probably patting himself on his back after <a href="http://aapl.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apples-new-stores-wow-the-street-and-the-street/">yesterday's lovely write-up in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. <em>I'm so smart</em>, he was probably thinking, <em>those naysayers just wish they'd invested in Apple way back when!</em></p>
<p>And then. Everybody started selling. Before MacBook could rack up its nth sale (<a href="http://www.looprumors.com/index.php?intel-imac-macbook-sales-very-strong">rumored to be good</a> even by Apple's projections), before Jobs could reach around for that acrobatic back pat, the market had hammered APPL to the tune of $2.08 -- a whopping 3.19%. The stock ended the day at $63.18.</p>
<p>Despite the sell-off, reviewers can't say enough good about the MacBook; <a href="http://www.macworld.com/2006/05/firstlooks/macbookbench/index.php"><em>MacWorld </em>said it was faster</a> than the fastest iBook G4&nbsp;in almost all of its tests. And <a href="http://www.forbes.com/personalfinance/strategies/2006/05/18/apple-gm-retail-in_ps_0518soapbox_inl.html"><em>Forbes</em> went raving on about the new Manhattan Apple store</a> (in a historically dank and failure-ridden space, however). So why the big sell-off? Could&nbsp;it be a side-effect of <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4996164.stm">bad news at rival Dell</a>?&nbsp;If you sold today, what were you <em>thinking</em>?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/18/apple-after-the-bell-05-18-06-walloped-by-end-of-day-selloff/">Apple after the bell 05-18-06: walloped by end-of-day selloff</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 May 2006 17:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/18/apple-after-the-bell-05-18-06-walloped-by-end-of-day-selloff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/619729/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/18/apple-after-the-bell-05-18-06-walloped-by-end-of-day-selloff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appl</category><category>appl sell-off</category><category>apple</category><category>apple close</category><category>apple sell-off</category><category>apple store</category><category>apple stores</category><category>AppleClose</category><category>AppleSell-off</category><category>AppleStore</category><category>AppleStores</category><category>ApplSell-off</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>big apple</category><category>BigApple</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>macbook</category><category>macworld</category><category>sell-off</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 17:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 05-17-06: black is the new MacBook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img alt="black macbook" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/applemacbookblack.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Apple always has to be different. But today, everyone cheered as the company brought out a version of their pretty laptop, the MacBook, in matt black (yes, that's the same finish as your boring old PC). Our sister site, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/17/hands-on-with-the-apple-macbook/">Engadget, took the MacBook for a spin</a> and declared it "a pretty freaking great value" (but they're not doing black, for the record). The <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1750">Apple Insider hails</a> the removable (by an actual user!) hard disks. No more purely cosmetic screws!</p>
<p>It wasn't all black hearts and roses, though; <a href="http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=14663&amp;Page=1&amp;pagePos=8"><em>MacWorld UK</em> today mourned the locking down</a> of OS X. Thanks to concerns of piracy, Apple closed down its open source code so that developers can no longer tinker with its operating system. Bad for pirates is also bad for very advanced users; says Tom Yager, "there are ways to address the piracy issue without stripping the critical and defining quality of openness from OS X."</p>
<p>AAPL stock responded by ticking <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/detailedquotes?sym=aapl&amp;exch=USA">up 25 cents to $65.26 on lower-than-average volume</a>. Evidently the market, while intrigued, isn't ready to jump unreservedly on board for black is the new MacBook.</p>
<p>[Photo <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/redjar/147711173/">redjar</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/">Apple after the bell 05-17-06: black is the new MacBook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 May 2006 18:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/619360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>appl</category><category>apple</category><category>apple black</category><category>apple closing</category><category>apple closing bell</category><category>apple computer</category><category>AppleBlack</category><category>AppleClosing</category><category>AppleClosingBell</category><category>AppleComputer</category><category>black</category><category>black apple</category><category>black macbook</category><category>BlackApple</category><category>BlackMacbook</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>macbook</category><category>new apple</category><category>new apple computer</category><category>NewApple</category><category>NewAppleComputer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner after the bell 05-04-06: AOL's C  sends stock down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/time-warner-after-the-bell-05-04-06-aols-c-sends-stock-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/time-warner-after-the-bell-05-04-06-aols-c-sends-stock-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/time-warner-after-the-bell-05-04-06-aols-c-sends-stock-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/quote-twx_endofday_05042006.JPG" alt="twx intraday chart 05-04-06"/>No one likes to be average, even if there's a little plus sign after your "C." This grade, handed down byCNNMoney for AOL's performance as compared to other internet search firms, may have been the impetus to send <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=USA&amp;sym=TWX&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1">TimeWarner's stock down another nine cents to $17.03</a>, despite a hopeful market open.<br /><br />There certainly wasn'tmuch in the way of love for Time Warner today. <em>Business Week</em> wondered if AOL wasn't moving too slow, <ahref="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2006/tc20060504_747054.htm?chan=investing_investingstocks">mourning "The Ails of AOL"</a>; <a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12630445/">Jeremy MacNealy of theMotley Fool snarks</a> at how "pleased" Dick Parsons was despite "net revenues inching forward just 1%versus the year-ago period"; and while <ahref="http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=17&amp;issue=20060503">some analysts said</a> TimeWarner's prospects were "promising," still, it's "not enough" to get a boost in recommendationsfrom anyone on the street.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/time-warner-after-the-bell-05-04-06-aols-c-sends-stock-down/">Time Warner after the bell 05-04-06: AOL's C  sends stock down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 May 2006 20:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/time-warner-after-the-bell-05-04-06-aols-c-sends-stock-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/615080/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/time-warner-after-the-bell-05-04-06-aols-c-sends-stock-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$17.03</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>aol</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>twx close</category><category>twx closing bell</category><category>twx down</category><category>TwxClose</category><category>TwxClosingBell</category><category>TwxDown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 20:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 05-04-06: it's buy time, baby]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/quote-msft_endofday_05042006.JPG" alt="microsoft intraday chart05-04-06" />Investors may finally have heard the credulity of people like <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/">me</a>,<a href="http://aol.fool.com/News/mft/2006/mft06050323.htm?logvisit=y&amp;source=eptaollnk308100&amp;npu=y">Tim Beyersof Motley Fool</a>, and any number of Microsoft employees. The stock <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/detailedquotes?exch=USA&amp;sym=MSFT&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1">tradedup 27 cents, or 1.17%, to $23.44</a> on about-average volume. Of course, the stock still sits at its lowest price in thelast four years, despite the fact that the company is both (a) profitable and (b) still dominating the world in itsusual way.<br /><br />Oddly, the price increase came on a day in which the Microsoft news was dominated by a rathernegative spin; everyone is wondering why the company changed the name of MSN adCenter to Microsoft adCenter. <ahref="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060504-020318">Says Jennifer Slegg of Search Engine Watch</a>, "I amnot sure that rebranding from MSN to Microsoft is the best decision for adCenter, but it is certainly a decision thatwill get people talking." Evidently, talk is enough for a 1% runup. As Martha says, that's a good thing.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/">Microsoft after the bell 05-04-06: it's buy time, baby</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 May 2006 19:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/615077/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$23.44</category><category>after hours</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>buy microsoft</category><category>buy msft</category><category>BuyMicrosoft</category><category>BuyMsft</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft buy</category><category>microsoft close</category><category>MicrosoftBuy</category><category>MicrosoftClose</category><category>msft</category><category>msft close</category><category>MsftClose</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 19:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay after the bell 05-04-06: Meg promises much, investors unimpressed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-after-the-bell-05-04-06-meg-promises-much-investors-unimp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-after-the-bell-05-04-06-meg-promises-much-investors-unimp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-after-the-bell-05-04-06-meg-promises-much-investors-unimp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="ebay chart 05-04-06"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/quote-ebay_endofday_05042006.JPG" />The big news today from eBay'sanalyst day was that <ahref="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-05-04T155429Z_01_N04268920_RTRIDST_0_TECH-EBAY-CEO-UPDATE-1.XML">MegWhitman was promising</a>: now, with even <em>more </em>revenue growth! Her presentation, and that of the otherexecutives from eBay proper, PayPal and Skype, were really great. Evidently, either (a) you investors weren't watchingor (b) without the analysts to tell you if it was good, you weren't ready to pull the trigger. After all, if a companytalks to the analysts through market close, how can they affect the market? The stock was down a teeny bit, <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/charts?exch=USA&amp;sym=EBAY&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1#">sixcents, to $34.11, on a bit better-than-average volume</a>.<br /><br />Well. If you were online with me, you were armedwith more info (you know, to toot my own horn, and all). I filled you in about eBay's <ahref="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-analyst-day-what-about-craigslist/">view of their craigslistinvestment</a>; how they planned to <ahref="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-analyst-day-all-about-synergies/">create synergies with Skype</a>;how proud was the company of their <ahref="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-analyst-day-skype-gets-7-of-worldwide-minutes/">7% of worldwidelong distance minutes</a>; how <ahref="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-analyst-day-mobile-money-with-paypal/">PayPal will soon let youbuy used books at your neighbor's yard sale with your mobile phone</a>; and how <ahref="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-analyst-day-3-billion-in-paypal-debit-withdrawals/">$3 billion incash was withdrawn from ATMs via PayPal debit cards</a>. If I had to pick one thing I came away from those hours ofwatching Meg &amp; team present (I mean, something substantial... I could go on forever about fashion choices but thisisn't the style blog) it was that they really believe in their vision and they are fantastic at describing it. I wasfeeling a little scared off by the stock's rich price, but after listening to Meg, Bob, and the Skype and PayPal execstell me about how they're going to change the world? Boy do I want to be along for the ride.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-after-the-bell-05-04-06-meg-promises-much-investors-unimp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eBay after the bell 05-04-06: Meg promises much, investors unimpressed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-after-the-bell-05-04-06-meg-promises-much-investors-unimp/">eBay after the bell 05-04-06: Meg promises much, investors unimpressed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 May 2006 19:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-after-the-bell-05-04-06-meg-promises-much-investors-unimp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/615063/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/ebay-after-the-bell-05-04-06-meg-promises-much-investors-unimp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$34.11</category><category>05-03-06</category><category>05-04-06</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>analyst day</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceo meg whitman</category><category>CeoMegWhitman</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>ebay</category><category>ebay 05-04-06</category><category>ebay after the bell</category><category>ebay analyst</category><category>ebay analyst day</category><category>ebay ceo</category><category>ebay closing bell</category><category>ebay ended</category><category>ebay wrapup</category><category>Ebay05-04-06</category><category>EbayAfterTheBell</category><category>ebayanalystday</category><category>EbayCeo</category><category>EbayClosingBell</category><category>EbayEnded</category><category>EbayWrapup</category><category>end of day</category><category>EndOfDay</category><category>live</category><category>live blogging</category><category>meg</category><category>meg whitman</category><category>MegWhitman</category><category>paypal</category><category>skype</category><category>whitman</category><category>wrapup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 19:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 5-03-06: four-year low, Fool says don't sell!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="msft chart may 3 "src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/quote-msft_endofday_05032006.JPG" />I'd like to know what all thosesellers are thinking. Really! I mean, look at this chart. There we have it, down down and more down. <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=NAS&amp;from=his&amp;sym=E%3ANAS%3AMSFT#">MSFT is now at its52-week low</a> -- in fact, the stock hasn't been this low since October 4, 2002. I know! Today, the stock closed at$23.17, down 3.5%. It's now trading 15% below its high last week. Ouch. Guess everyone <em>does</em> believe <ahref="http://msft.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/">Gartner'sreport about Vista delays</a>.<br /><br />Those who are selling right now? In my opinion, it's irrational depression.Why sell at the low? Panic, I suppose, but it seems highly, um, foolish. <ahref="http://aol.fool.com/News/mft/2006/mft06050323.htm?logvisit=y&amp;source=eptaollnk308100&amp;npu=y">Tim Beyers, hewho is Motley Foolish but not, you know, foolish, agrees</a>. He argues that, even if you buy the idea that Microsoftmight be taking second fiddle to Google (the <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/">Evil-Empire</a>-come-lately),it's still a good company to own. After all, they are rife with cash-ola and they absolutely, totally dominate theaverage laptop. Come on now, look around you at the coffee shop. How many laptops don't have Windows-based software?<br/><br />Unless you're tapping away at my favorite worker-owned coffee collective (where everyone either has an iBook ora built-from-scratch Linux geek-machine), the answer is: few. If I owned Mr. Softee right now, I'd be holding. And if Iowned a pile full of cash right now, I'd be buying. There may be more down. But I'd bet at least some of my children'sfuture on the long-term <em>up</em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/">Microsoft after the bell 5-03-06: four-year low, Fool says don't sell!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 May 2006 17:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/614665/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4-year low</category><category>4-yearLow</category><category>52-week low</category><category>52-weekLow</category><category>after hours</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>close</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>end of day</category><category>EndOfDay</category><category>fool</category><category>foolish</category><category>four-year low</category><category>Four-yearLow</category><category>low</category><category>microsoft down</category><category>MicrosoftDown</category><category>motley fool</category><category>MotleyFool</category><category>msft at the bell</category><category>msft close</category><category>msft down</category><category>msft low</category><category>MsftAtTheBell</category><category>MsftClose</category><category>MsftDown</category><category>MsftLow</category><category>tim beyers</category><category>TimBeyers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 17:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
