<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks: Will store closings lift company's fortunes?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/starbucks-will-store-closings-lift-companys-fortunes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/starbucks-will-store-closings-lift-companys-fortunes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/starbucks-will-store-closings-lift-companys-fortunes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/starbucks_corner_240.jpg" alt="" />I hemmed and hawed when I saw <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/starbucks-great-again/story.aspx?guid=%7B9F1B60D6-CA23-4ED5-BC0C-91B26F61DACC%7D">Jennifer Openshaw's piece on MarketWatch</a> a few weeks ago; her opinion was that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) <em>would</em> recover much of its lost value in these past several months of sluggish sales, rising milk costs and slipping coolness, no matter what the naysayers, say. Her argument: that Starbucks was great because of its atmosphere and general quality standards in coffee. While I certainly agree that Starbucks is still an attractive "third place" and would pick Pike Place brew every time over McDonald's or Dunkin Donuts coffee, I hesitated. Had management already made too many mis-steps? Had hubris got the best of the 'Bucks?<br /><br />The latest news; that Starbucks management has <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/starbucks-to-close-600-stores/">plans to close 600 stores in the U.S. this year</a>; could be an indication of positive things in the company's stock price. It certainly had traders in after-hours activity eagerly snapping up shares, sending 72 cents, or 4.6%, to $16.34 around 2 a.m. I'm always leery, though, of a huge strategy reversal such as this. In my analysis of Starbucks' financial statements, the company spends about $300,000 to start a new store, and this is largely funded through cash. Management regularly offers old furniture and equipment to its high-ranking employees when upgrading or shutting down a store, so it's unlikely that much of the cost will be recouped. <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/another-defeat.html">Doug McIntyre noted further</a> that Starbucks will continue to pay more millions in lease costs; the company is known for locking up prime real estate with serious long-term lease agreements. Sure, the loss won't affect the cash balance much, and the charge will be "one-time," so the financial picture will still look rosy in a year when the charge has dropped into "historical financial statements." Investors don't look back.<br /><br />But by acknowledging that some $180 million in costs, not to mention the hundreds of millions probably spent to train and employ staff at these locations, was a big waste of money, Starbucks management is owning up to a future of slow growth.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/starbucks-will-store-closings-lift-companys-fortunes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks: Will store closings lift company's fortunes?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/starbucks-will-store-closings-lift-companys-fortunes/">Starbucks: Will store closings lift company's fortunes?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/starbucks-will-store-closings-lift-companys-fortunes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1243199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/starbucks-will-store-closings-lift-companys-fortunes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>closing stores</category><category>ClosingStores</category><category>coffee</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>third place</category><category>ThirdPlace</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:06:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
