I found an interesting and sobering article while searching through the news this morning. It appears that the U.S. Postal Service may close up to 1,000 local offices thanks to snowballing financial issues. There are other options, including: reducing post office hours, consolidating processing centers, and doing away with Saturday delivery. Last Thursday, the Postal Service presented a list of 681 post offices that it will study for possible closure, with most of them in urban areas - located close to other offices. Such a move would not impact delivery at homes and businesses. Ending Saturday delivery is expected to save $2 billion to $3 billion a year, as current mail volumes can't support Saturday (six-day) delivery. According to the article, the volume of regular mail dropped 5% last year and is expected to drop 15% in 2009 --- this would result in a $7billion loss.closings posts
FeedPost Office may cut delivery, close branches
I found an interesting and sobering article while searching through the news this morning. It appears that the U.S. Postal Service may close up to 1,000 local offices thanks to snowballing financial issues. There are other options, including: reducing post office hours, consolidating processing centers, and doing away with Saturday delivery. Last Thursday, the Postal Service presented a list of 681 post offices that it will study for possible closure, with most of them in urban areas - located close to other offices. Such a move would not impact delivery at homes and businesses. Ending Saturday delivery is expected to save $2 billion to $3 billion a year, as current mail volumes can't support Saturday (six-day) delivery. According to the article, the volume of regular mail dropped 5% last year and is expected to drop 15% in 2009 --- this would result in a $7billion loss.Continue reading Post Office may cut delivery, close branches
Ford (F) will seek deeper cuts than General Motors (GM) when UAW comes to town
Although the heated battle this week between the United Autoworkers Union and General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) was more than enough distraction for the Detroit automaker, GM finally admitted that it make vehicles -- not health plans -- but it will make nice and compromise anyway. For a company still struggling to return to consistent profitability, it needs to get back to making vehicles.
Competitor Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) stated this week that the deal cut with GM may not be enough for it in terms of cost cuts. Ford is in worse financial shape than GM at this time, something very well known to UAW president Ron Gettelfinger. In fact, Gettelfinger stated that the GM deal worked on this week will be a rough template for deals with Ford and the Chrysler group. But, with Ford needing cuts that go deeper than GMs, the template may need major modifications when Ford's time rolls around.
Although reports state Gettelfinger will take Ford's current status into account when both parties sit down at the negotiating table, Ford CEO Alan Mulally will require it. Mulally says that no deal will be accepted by Ford that doesn't make the automaker fully competitive with overseas rivals. Its goal: cut labor costs in the U.S. by 30%. If we think the UAW / GM deal was intense, the feathers will really fly when Ford sits down at the lead chair soon.
Of course, David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, said that "The last thing the UAW wants to do is jeopardize the future of Ford ... they'll get some modification that fits the situation." Ford's 2006 annual loss of $12.6 billion will require on heck of a modification to any new agreement, that's for sure.
Competitor Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) stated this week that the deal cut with GM may not be enough for it in terms of cost cuts. Ford is in worse financial shape than GM at this time, something very well known to UAW president Ron Gettelfinger. In fact, Gettelfinger stated that the GM deal worked on this week will be a rough template for deals with Ford and the Chrysler group. But, with Ford needing cuts that go deeper than GMs, the template may need major modifications when Ford's time rolls around.
Although reports state Gettelfinger will take Ford's current status into account when both parties sit down at the negotiating table, Ford CEO Alan Mulally will require it. Mulally says that no deal will be accepted by Ford that doesn't make the automaker fully competitive with overseas rivals. Its goal: cut labor costs in the U.S. by 30%. If we think the UAW / GM deal was intense, the feathers will really fly when Ford sits down at the lead chair soon.
Of course, David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, said that "The last thing the UAW wants to do is jeopardize the future of Ford ... they'll get some modification that fits the situation." Ford's 2006 annual loss of $12.6 billion will require on heck of a modification to any new agreement, that's for sure.
Tax Reform in This Election Year: It's Not Likely
Bonds Are a 'Safe' Investment: A Big Lie Gets Even Bigger

