<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[JCPenney: Q3 Report Bodes Well for 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/15/jcpenney-q3-report-bodes-well-for-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/15/jcpenney-q3-report-bodes-well-for-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/15/jcpenney-q3-report-bodes-well-for-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jcp/" rel="tag">Penney (J.C.) (JCP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/jcp-logo-240.jpg" />The stock pattern of J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/penney-j-c-co-inc-holding-co/jcp/nys">JCP</a>), first discussed here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/jc-penney-will-be-around-for-the-next-economic-expansion/">on April 13, 2009</a>, at a price of $26.52, has not been for the feint of heart, but it appears that the worst of the storm is over regarding this long-time, persevering retail chain.<br />
<br />
First the short-term data: JCPenney posted third quarter earnings per share <a href="http://www.jcpenney.net/about/jcpmedia/corporatenews/articles/JCPenney_Reports_Third_Quarter_Results,164.aspx">of 19 cents</a>, 2 cents above the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/analyst?symbol=JCP">17-cent</a> First Call estimate, on revenue of $4.19 billion, slightly below the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/analyst?symbol=JCP">$4.25 billion</a> First Call estimate. Same store sales rose 1.9% -- the third straight quarterly increase. Overall, it wasn't a bad Q3 report, but, of course, in today's high-bar investment climate, the street sold the shares, and JCP closed Friday down $1.09 to $31.03. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/15/jcpenney-q3-report-bodes-well-for-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JCPenney: Q3 Report Bodes Well for 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/15/jcpenney-q3-report-bodes-well-for-2011/">JCPenney: Q3 Report Bodes Well for 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/15/jcpenney-q3-report-bodes-well-for-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19719097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/15/jcpenney-q3-report-bodes-well-for-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clothes</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jc penney</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chico and the woman]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.noworrycurry.com/elijahclub/wp-content/chicos_logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Shares of women's specialty retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chico-s-fas-inc/chs/nys">Chico's FAS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chico-s-fas-inc/chs/nys">CHS</a>) rose slightly yesterday despite the company posting another quarterly loss. </p>
<p>The operator of 1,074 Chico's, White House/Black Market and Soma Intimates stores said its fourth-quarter loss widened on store impairment charges and severance costs, but absent those charges results exceeded Wall Street's expectations. </p>
<p>The loss for the quarter was $40.5 million, or 23 cents per share including the charges, and 14 cents per share without. Last year's fourth-quarter loss was $20.5 million, or 12 cents per share. Sales fell 9% from a year ago to $373.4 million, while same-store sales were off 13% overall (17% at Chico's and 5% at White House/Black Market). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chico and the woman</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/">Chico and the woman</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1479042/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chicos</category><category>CHS</category><category>clothes</category><category>clothing</category><category>clothing stores</category><category>ClothingStores</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>retail</category><category>retailers</category><category>soma intimates</category><category>SomaIntimates</category><category>white label black market</category><category>WhiteLabelBlackMarket</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Wal-Mart outfashion Target? Finally, maybe?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/can-wal-mart-outfashion-target-finally-maybe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/can-wal-mart-outfashion-target-finally-maybe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/can-wal-mart-outfashion-target-finally-maybe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/walmart_forless_240.jpg" />Having already gained dominance in a huge swath of American retail consumer goods including toys, books, and electronics, the insatiable juggernaut of Bentonville has now set its sights on fashion -- again. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> has always <a href="http://walmartwatch.com/blog/archives/wal_mart_stumbles_with_fashion_line/">struggled </a>with this fickle category, where threading the needle between cheap and cool was well nigh impossible.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/can-wal-mart-outfashion-target-finally-maybe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Wal-Mart outfashion Target? Finally, maybe?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/can-wal-mart-outfashion-target-finally-maybe/">Can Wal-Mart outfashion Target? Finally, maybe?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/can-wal-mart-outfashion-target-finally-maybe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1466344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/can-wal-mart-outfashion-target-finally-maybe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apparel</category><category>clothes</category><category>designer</category><category>fashion</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail</category><category>Target</category><category>tgt</category><category>WalMart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why the Street is wrong about Abercrombie &amp; Fitch]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/why-the-street-is-wrong-about-abercrombie-and-fitch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/why-the-street-is-wrong-about-abercrombie-and-fitch/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/why-the-street-is-wrong-about-abercrombie-and-fitch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/anf/" rel="tag">Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/anf-abercrombie--fitch-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abercrombie-and-fitch-co/anf/nys">Abercrombie &amp; Fitch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abercrombie-and-fitch-co/anf/nys">ANF</a>) is probably the best managed specialty retailer of the pack. It's maintained strict discipline on pricing and discounting, unlike many of its peers. ANF has managed to expand its offerings into three separated branded chains selling to different markets.</p>
<p>And the company enjoyed accolades from Wall Street after it beat earnings estimates handily on Feb. 13, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/abercrombie-and-fitch-4q-profit-declines/342312">reporting earnings of $1.10 per share versus consensus of $1.01 per share</a>. Shares were up over 10% on the news. While I think not much has changed with Abercrombie's operational expertise and its strategy, the current environment is simply not conducive to teens paying big bucks for clothes.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/why-the-street-is-wrong-about-abercrombie-and-fitch/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why the Street is wrong about Abercrombie &amp; Fitch</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/why-the-street-is-wrong-about-abercrombie-and-fitch/">Why the Street is wrong about Abercrombie &amp; Fitch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/why-the-street-is-wrong-about-abercrombie-and-fitch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1459953/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/why-the-street-is-wrong-about-abercrombie-and-fitch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ANF</category><category>clothes</category><category>consumption</category><category>mal</category><category>retail</category><category>shopping</category><category>teens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer apparel chain spending 'dismal']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/c/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[In a sign that Americans are bracing themselves for hard times, or at least taking a break and holding their breath while they see what direction things go in, apparel chains reported September sales, which usually rise at this time of year, were not at all where stores expect them to be.<br /><br />In a sign that customers are looking toward frugality, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WalMart Stores, Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) saw a small gain in sales, though not as much as analysts would have liked.<br /><br />Look for this effect to hit other retail environments, not just apparel, if the market continues to be the top headline and spook customers.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/c/">Consumer apparel chain spending 'dismal'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/apparel-chains-report-dismal-september/76832>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1337906/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apparel</category><category>clothes</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerConfidence</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>wal-mart</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Cruising past the GAP - the stores &amp; the stock]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/chasing-value-cruising-past-the-gap-the-stores-and-the-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/chasing-value-cruising-past-the-gap-the-stores-and-the-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/chasing-value-cruising-past-the-gap-the-stores-and-the-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jcp/" rel="tag">Penney (J.C.) (JCP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a></p><p>Cruising down Wilshire Boulevard I noticed fresh window dressing at the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys/detailedquotes?freq=1">Gap Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys/detailedquotes?freq=1">GPS</a>) promoting it's version of "dress shirts," long sleeves rolled up to the elbow, in everyday colors; white, blue, striped. They were simple and clean, and for the right price, it's all good. But then that's the problem with the Gap now, <em>it's all good -- and nothing great.</em></p>
<p>The Gap seems to be on cruise control. Everything about it seems average. It's not that it doesn't offer nice clothes, it's just that I can get them anywhere. I can find the same merchandise at any number of stores including some places that have not been traditional competitors until now, like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/j-c-penney-co-inc-hldg-co/jcp/nys?freq=1">JC Penny</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/j-c-penney-co-inc-hldg-co/jcp/nys?freq=1">JCP</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Sears Holdings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SHLD</a>), via catalog or online retailers such as Lands' End (owned by Sears) and many more. Equally important, the Gap seems to have lost its ability to distinguish itself in any way except for Gap Kid's which I think has more to offer. The Old Navy Stores and Banana Republic owned by Gap Inc. at least conjure up some image or separate identity.</p>
<p>Speaking about average, I checked out the stock to find it closed yesterday at $18.78 within pennies of its 52 week average, between a low of $15.91 and its high of 21.39. How nice that it pays a dividend, but it too is average with a yield of 1.7%. Its profits margins are low to average, its ROE is average and lower than its P/E around 21 which is too high. And so I cruised past the stores and now have cruised past the stock and if you should be thinking about investing in the Gap, I recommend you cruise on by as well. <br /></p>
<p>But don't just take my word for it. Yesterday my young BloggingStocks colleague Zac Bissonnette posted <a title="View comment 5993426 on www.bloggingstocks.com" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/02/gap-hopes-white-t-shirt-is-its-savior/#c5993426" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">Gap hopes white t-shirt is its savior</font></a>, outlining a similar view in portraying a petty attempt by Gap to Glam Up...Not!</p>
<p>Those of you who are new to BloggingStocks can check out my other stories and read <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a> to find more potential opportunities and verify my track record as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. </em><em>Check out his other posts for<strong> BloggingStocks </strong></em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/sheldon-liber/"><em><strong>here</strong></em></a><em><strong>.</strong></em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/chasing-value-cruising-past-the-gap-the-stores-and-the-stock/">Chasing Value: Cruising past the GAP - the stores &amp; the stock</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/02/gap-hopes-white-t-shirt-is-its-savior/#c5993426>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/chasing-value-cruising-past-the-gap-the-stores-and-the-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/943626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/chasing-value-cruising-past-the-gap-the-stores-and-the-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chasing Value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Clothes</category><category>Gap Inc (GPS)</category><category>GapInc(gps)</category><category>Penney (J.C.) (JCP)</category><category>Penney(j.c.)(jcp)</category><category>Retail merchandising</category><category>RetailMerchandising</category><category>Sears Holdings (SHLD)</category><category>SearsHoldings(shld)</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer likes panties: says 'Buy' Hanesbrands spin-off]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/cramer-likes-panties-says-buy-hanesbrands-spin-off/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/cramer-likes-panties-says-buy-hanesbrands-spin-off/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/cramer-likes-panties-says-buy-hanesbrands-spin-off/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sle/" rel="tag">Sara Lee Corp (SLE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/coh/" rel="tag">Coach Inc (COH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dri/" rel="tag">Darden Restaurants (DRI)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="display: block;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/hanes_comfortsoft.jpg" /></div>
Wednesday on Jim Cramer's <em>MAD MONEY,</em> the loud-but-excited analyst discussed a spinoff of Hanesbrands Inc. (NYSE:HBI) fom Sara Lee Corp. (NYSE:SLE).<br /><br />The question on investor's minds should be, naturally, does a spinoff make sense? To give a little background, Cramer referred back to the GM-Delphi spinoff, opining that the two auto units were too tangled to properly unwind. In this case, it may be a bit simpler; after all, he asked, does it make sense for a cupcake and meat company to own an underwear company? Nope, said he, the two units needed to be under a different roof. Can HBI make you money? Cramer says, "yes."<br /><br />Hanesbrands shares <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hanesbrands-inc/hbi/nys">traded up 2.3% to $23.18</a> in after-hours trading after Cramer's well-reasoned recommendation, especially after he referred back to several prior deals, including the Freescale spinoff, the Coach spinoff, and the Darden spinoff.<br /><br />He did say that Sara Lee forced it to take on a lot of debt, but the company's lower margins may improve since manufacturing has been moved internationally.<br /><br />In a call-in Cramer said he thinks Under Armour, Inc. (NASDAQ:UARM) is going higher. In another call Cramer said Jos. A Bank Clothiers, Inc. (NASDAQ:JOSB) is a "stay away" story.<br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a partner in <a href="http://247wallst.com">24/7 Wall St., LLC;</a> he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/cramer-likes-panties-says-buy-hanesbrands-spin-off/">Cramer likes panties: says 'Buy' Hanesbrands spin-off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/cramer-likes-panties-says-buy-hanesbrands-spin-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/683388/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/cramer-likes-panties-says-buy-hanesbrands-spin-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clothes</category><category>clothiers</category><category>hanes</category><category>hanes brands</category><category>hanes underwear</category><category>hanesbrands</category><category>HanesUnderwear</category><category>jos banks</category><category>jos. a bank</category><category>Jos.ABank</category><category>josb</category><category>JosBanks</category><category>panties</category><category>uarm</category><category>under armour</category><category>UnderArmour</category><category>underwear</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
