<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tops on Twitter: 12 companies that are doing it right]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/tops-on-twitter-12-companies-that-are-doing-it-right/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/tops-on-twitter-12-companies-that-are-doing-it-right/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/tops-on-twitter-12-companies-that-are-doing-it-right/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfmi/" rel="tag">Whole Foods Market (WFMI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/twitter-logo-200x150.jpg" />With close to 60 million users, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> is a force corporate marketing departments just can't ignore. The reach offered by this <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/microblogging/">microblogging</a> platform is profound, and skipping it means yielding digital turf to the competition. </p>
<p>Yet, as the country's major brands have flocked to Twitter, not all have mastered it. Some merely push headlines and deals, while others have used it as a way to open a dialogue with their customers, build relationships and ultimately grow their businesses. A study by <em>The Big Money </em>sought to determine the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34243625/ns/business-the_big_money/">dozen companies that are mastering Twitter</a> and why they are the masters.</p>
<p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/tops-on-twitter-12-companies-that-are-doing-it-right/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tops on Twitter: 12 companies that are doing it right</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/tops-on-twitter-12-companies-that-are-doing-it-right/">Tops on Twitter: 12 companies that are doing it right</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34243625/ns/business-the_big_money/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/tops-on-twitter-12-companies-that-are-doing-it-right/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19267459/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/tops-on-twitter-12-companies-that-are-doing-it-right/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>amzn</category><category>biz stone</category><category>BNO</category><category>cmcsa</category><category>cnn</category><category>comcast</category><category>dell</category><category>E Online</category><category>Etsy</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>health magazine</category><category>jblu</category><category>Jetblue</category><category>microblogging</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>msnbc</category><category>NBA</category><category>new york times</category><category>nyt</category><category>silicon alley insider</category><category>social media</category><category>the big money</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twitter</category><category>twitterholic</category><category>twx</category><category>UsaToday</category><category>washington post</category><category>whole foods</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner inks deal with YouTube]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/time-warner-twx-inks-deal-with-youtube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/time-warner-twx-inks-deal-with-youtube/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/time-warner-twx-inks-deal-with-youtube/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="time warner youtube deal" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/youtube-goog.gif" width="220" height="118" />In a move to bring profitability to its popular video sharing site YouTube, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has inked a deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>) to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125070124784543543.html">show clips</a> of the company's television shows and movies.</p>
<p>When Google announced back in 2006 that it would be paying $1.65 billion for the popular video sharing site, a lot of critics questioned whether or not the company would be able to turn a profit from the site, which at the time had around 46% of the online video market share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/time-warner-twx-inks-deal-with-youtube/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner inks deal with YouTube</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/time-warner-twx-inks-deal-with-youtube/">Time Warner inks deal with YouTube</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/time-warner-twx-inks-deal-with-youtube/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19134333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/time-warner-twx-inks-deal-with-youtube/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>cartoon network</category><category>CNN</category><category>deals</category><category>entourage</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>gossip girl</category><category>Hung</category><category>inthenews</category><category>marketing</category><category>online video</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>videos</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How much does Time Warner (TWX) have to cut to save margins?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/time-warner-twx-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />When embattled <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CEO Jeff Bewkes gets on the company's fourth quarter earnings call next week, February 4, he will certainly be asked one thing. With the advertising market facing one of its worst periods in years, how does he intend to keep profit margins high? Several of the company's businesses, particularly magazine group Time, Inc., AOL (parent company of BloggingStocks), and the firm's cable networks, rely on advertising for a large portion of their revenue.</p>
<p>Late last year, Time, Inc. cut 600 jobs. AOL <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">just said</a> it would let another 700 people go. No plans have been announced for cable operations like CNN, but those may come.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How much does Time Warner (TWX) have to cut to save margins?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/">How much does Time Warner (TWX) have to cut to save margins?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1444219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>CNN</category><category>Inc</category><category>Time</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Outsourcing the newspaper business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/outsourcing-the-newspaper-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/outsourcing-the-newspaper-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/outsourcing-the-newspaper-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/newspaperpic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It seems that at some point soon newspapers will not even need writers. They will simply keep presses and trucks to print and deliver their products. It is a hell of a way for a once-proud business to survive.
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123197973917183829.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>Two major newspapers publishers are taking steps to outsource international coverage, as falling revenue is causing more U.S. papers to shrink their foreign and national footprint." The Tribune Company, now in bankruptcy, and <em>The New York Daily News</em>, which is not part of any chain, may end up closing any offices they have outside the US.</p>
<p>Many US newspapers get most of their national news from agencies like the AP. What does that leave?</p>
<p>It leaves a great deal actually, and what it leaves is the key to the survival of newspaper--local coverage. Consumers can get international and national news from hundreds of websites from CNN to USA Today.com. But, what they cannot get is what is going on in the paper's hometown. And, that is often the most important news that readers look for. Other than the local newspaper there is no source to provide it.</p>
<p>Local newspapers may survive by being "all local" along with their websites. This is what the American newspaper was a century-and-a-half ago. Few papers had any access to news from outside their small regions. People turned to their newspapers as a way to find out about the smaller, more intimate world around them.</p>
<p>The future of the newspaper industry may take it back to 1855.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/outsourcing-the-newspaper-business/">Outsourcing the newspaper business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/outsourcing-the-newspaper-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1430234/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/outsourcing-the-newspaper-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AP</category><category>CNN</category><category>inthenews</category><category>The New York Daily News</category><category>The Tribune Company</category><category>TheNewYorkDailyNews</category><category>TheTribuneCompany</category><category>USAToday.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner now expects a loss]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/time-warner-now-expects-a-loss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/time-warner-now-expects-a-loss/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/time-warner-now-expects-a-loss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/time-warner-twx-logo.gif" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), which has been reeling from declining advertising sales, said today that its results would be worse-than-expected this year.<br /><br />In a statement released ahead of a presentation to analysts, the world's largest media conglomerate said it had a net loss in 2008 compared with its guidance issued in November that called for earnings of $1.04 to $1.07. Several one-time items contributed to the loss, including the write-down of a lease in the Time-Life building from a tenant that filed for bankruptcy. The write-offs total $25 billion.<br /><br />"In addition to these items, the economic environment has proved somewhat more challenging than the Company previously expected, particularly for the advertising businesses at the AOL and Publishing segments, further reducing the expected growth rate in 2008 Adjusted Operating Income before Depreciation and Amortization by about one percentage point," the company said in <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/template.NDM/news/all/?javax.portlet.tpst=ccf123a93466ea4c882a06a9149550fd_ws_MX&amp;javax.portlet.prp_ccf123a93466ea4c882a06a9149550fd_viewID=news_view_popup&amp;javax.portlet.prp_ccf123a93466ea4c882a06a9149550fd_newsLang=en&amp;javax.portlet.prp_ccf123a93466ea4c882a06a9149550fd_ndmHsc=v2*A1228741200000*B1231364561000*DgroupByDate*J2*L1*N1000003*Ztime%20warner&amp;javax.portlet.prp_ccf123a93466ea4c882a06a9149550fd_newsId=20090107005623&amp;beanID=2133606841&amp;viewID=news_view_popup&amp;javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&amp;javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken">press release</a>.<br /><br />None of this is surprising given the anemic environment for advertising. The company's magazine business is particularly vulnerable and has <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081110/time-inc-to-employees-want-to-quit-were-all-ears/">already experienced layoffs</a>. Investors are still eager for Time Warner to dispose of AOL, though a deal for the parent of this blog is not likely until the economy improves. Another business that may see further cutbacks is book publishing.<br /><br />Regardless, this news gave Wall Street a reason to avoid the New York-based company. Shares have rebounded a bit after trading down 10%.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/time-warner-now-expects-a-loss/">Time Warner now expects a loss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/template.NDM/news/all/?javax.portlet.tpst=ccf123a93466ea4c882a06a9149550fd_ws_MX&amp;javax.portlet.prp_ccf123a93466ea4c882a06a9149550fd_viewID=news_view_popup&amp;javax.portlet.prp_ccf123a93466ea4c882a06a9149550fd_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/time-warner-now-expects-a-loss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/time-warner-now-expects-a-loss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>CNN</category><category>EARnings</category><category>Entertainment</category><category>Inthenews</category><category>Media</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama vs. O'Reilly should be a ratings blockbuster for Fox]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/billoreillypic.jpg" alt="" />Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is about to enter the "No Spin Zone."<br /><br />The Illinois senator is due to be interviewed by Fox News' Bill O'Reilly, host of the "The O'Reilly Factor," on Thursday, the final night of The Republican National Convention, <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/long_time_coming_oreilly_to_interview_obama_thursday_93313.asp">according to TVNewser.com.</a> I am sure executives at Fox parent company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) were high-fiving each other when that interview was secured. The clash between the suave Obama and the bellicose O'Reilly will make for interesting television. It will be like a car accident on the highway that people can't help themselves from gawking at.<br /><br />Maybe Obama views it as a chance to show his supporters that he is not afraid of O'Reilly, who is a pussy cat compared with Russian strongman Vladimir Putin. It's also <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/mccain-media-at.html">quite a contrast to the strategy</a> of Republican John McCain, who is keeping the media at an arm's length. His campaign even canceled an interview the candidate had scheduled with CNN's Larry King because it did not like the <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/politics/brown_v_bounds_on_election_center_93231.asp">tough questions anchor Campbell Brown </a>asked its spokesman about the qualifiicaitons of his running-mate Sarah Palin.<br /><br />Both the Democratic and Republican conventions have been a dream come true for the cable news channels. More <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/sep/02/tvratings.democrats2008">people tuned into CNN</a>, which is owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), for Obama's acceptance than for Fox, MSNBC and the broadcast networks. The address got more viewers than the American Idol final, the Oscars, or the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics.<br /><br />Fox, though, continues to attract more viewers overall, especially during the Republican get-together in St. Paul. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) MSNBC is gaining viewers too, though some may be curious to see if its <a href="http://www.salon.com/5things/2008/08/27/msnbc_anchors_feud_o/index.html">feuding on-air personalities will break into a fist fight.</a> All three of the cable news networks are raking in major bucks from those annoying 30-second TV spots that are an unfortunate part of American political life.<br /><br />A winner has already emerged from the Obama-O'Reilly confrontation before a single punch has been thrown: News Corp. head Rupert Murdoch. The media baron lusts for the power to set the nation's political agenda. Come Thursday night, that's exactly what he will be able to do.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/">Obama vs. O'Reilly should be a ratings blockbuster for Fox</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/long_time_coming_oreilly_to_interview_obama_thursday_93313.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1303122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>bill oreilly</category><category>BillOreilly</category><category>Cambell Brown</category><category>CambellBrown</category><category>cnn</category><category>democrats</category><category>fox news</category><category>fox news channel</category><category>FoxNews</category><category>FoxNewsChannel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>MSNBC</category><category>NWS</category><category>OReilly Factor</category><category>OreillyFactor</category><category>presidential election</category><category>PresidentialElection</category><category>republicans</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Sarah Palin</category><category>SarahPalin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner walks on The Weather Channel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/14/time-warner-walks-on-the-weather-channel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/14/time-warner-walks-on-the-weather-channel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/14/time-warner-walks-on-the-weather-channel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/time-warner-twx-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Depending on who is doing the measuring, The Weather Channel is one of the most widely watched 24-hour cable networks. Weather.com is among the top 15 or 20 most visited websites in the U.S. Since there are very few media properties of this size on the block, they are especially valuable.</p>
<p>Landmark, the owner of The Weather Channel, has put it on the block. It wanted $5 billion. The rumors are that it will get $3.5 billion on a good day. The last two companies kicking the tires were <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) and NBC Universal. TWX has apparently dropped out. </p>
<p>Although the media conglomerate has over $9 billion in money coming in as it finishes its spin-off of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">Time Warner Cable</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">TWC</a>), management cannot afford to be viewed as overanxious. Paying too much for a large asset would not make the new era of shareholder value under recently appointed CEO Jeff Bewkes look like it is off to a terribly good start.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121338553233472749.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required), "Time Warner withdrew after Landmark told the media company it needed more time to make a decision." That probably means the seller is holding out for more cash.</p>
<p>For Time Warner, it is a shame. Its cable networks, CNN and Turner, do particularly well. Putting The Weather Channel with them would have built that business. Online, TWX has big properties like AOL and CNN.com, making Weather.com a good marriage.</p>
<p>It all made sense, except the price.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/14/time-warner-walks-on-the-weather-channel/">Time Warner walks on The Weather Channel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/14/time-warner-walks-on-the-weather-channel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1225487/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/14/time-warner-walks-on-the-weather-channel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>CNN</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeff Bewkes</category><category>Landmark</category><category>NBC</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWC</category><category>TWX</category><category>Weather Channel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Battle of the Brands: CNN vs. Fox (and MSNBC too)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-cnn-vs-fox-and-msnbc-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-cnn-vs-fox-and-msnbc-too/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-cnn-vs-fox-and-msnbc-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/battle-cnn-fox-200x267dr.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/battle-for-best-brands">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and check out other Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p>The heads of CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC along with their corporate masters at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) must be giggling with delight at the prospect of the Democratic presidential race continuing past the hotly contested race in Pennsylvania.</p>
<p>After all, controversy means more viewers, which of course means more advertising dollars. They probably wish that the Democrats would beat each other up in 30-second TV spots every year, but alas Americans elect a president every four years, which is probably a good thing for everybody. Still, the cable networks are going to ride this gravy train for as long as they can.</p>
<p>Like anything else in cable news, picking a winner in this battle of the brands depends on how you look at it. Fox, the home of Bill O'Reilly and Shepherd Smith, attracted 1.89 million viewers during Monday's prime time, the most of any network, according to Nielsen data cited by <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/the_scoreboard_monday_apr_21_83047.asp">TVNewser</a>. CNN attracted 1.03 million on its main network and 572,000 on its Headline News channel, while MSNBC was watched by 676,000.</p>
<p>Before conservatives start declaring Fox the top cable network yet again, remember that statistic does not represent the whole picture. Cable news advertisers are most interested in viewers aged 25 to 54 who are most likely to be interested in buying mutual funds and other products that they are shilling. That's where things get interesting.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-cnn-vs-fox-and-msnbc-too/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Battle of the Brands: CNN vs. Fox (and MSNBC too)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-cnn-vs-fox-and-msnbc-too/">Battle of the Brands: CNN vs. Fox (and MSNBC too)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 May 2008 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-cnn-vs-fox-and-msnbc-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1175861/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-cnn-vs-fox-and-msnbc-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battle of the Brands</category><category>cnn</category><category>cnn headline news</category><category>fox</category><category>fox news</category><category>ge</category><category>msnbc</category><category>npr</category><category>nws</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Group in China sues CNN for $1.3 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/group-in-china-sues-cnn-for-1-3-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/group-in-china-sues-cnn-for-1-3-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/group-in-china-sues-cnn-for-1-3-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/cnnlogo].jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It is a lawsuit which will never be won, but it does show how upset the Chinese are about being attacked for problems with their exports. Drug components for products like blood thinner Heparin are blamed for over 80 deaths in the US. Some of these components came from China. There have also been health issues with lead-paint-based toys which have been exported to US companies The paint is dangerous for children.</p>
<p>A group of citizens in China is sick of the US bully kicking sand in its faces. They have filed a $1.3 billion lawsuit against CNN, a unit of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>). The legal action represents $1 for each person in the world's most populated country. The current suit was launched by a Chinese primary school teacher and a beautician. There is also a suit by 14 mainland lawyers pending. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSPEK30866720080424">According to</a> <em>Reuters,</em> "The case (is) against the Atlanta-based cable channel, its parent company Turner Broadcasting and Jack Cafferty, the offending commentator." Cafferty said "They're basically the same bunch of goons and thugs they've been for the last 50 years" when referring to the Chinese who had sent lead-painted toys to the US. </p>
<p>Is the story a worthwhile one for the press to cover? Probably not. It really belongs in the entertainment sections of news programs and newspapers.</p>
<p>But the media will put it on the front page everywhere because no one can make up a story like this one.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/group-in-china-sues-cnn-for-1-3-billion/">Group in China sues CNN for $1.3 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSPEK30866720080424>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/group-in-china-sues-cnn-for-1-3-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1177317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/group-in-china-sues-cnn-for-1-3-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cnn</category><category>Jack Cafferty</category><category>JackCafferty</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option Update: CBS volatility flat as shares near record lows]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/08/option-update-cbs-volatility-flat-as-shares-near-record-lows/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/08/option-update-cbs-volatility-flat-as-shares-near-record-lows/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/08/option-update-cbs-volatility-flat-as-shares-near-record-lows/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/media/2008/04/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>CBS</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://option implied volatility ">CBS</a>) closed at $22.51 Monday. <br /></p>
<p><em>The New York Times</em> reported CBS has been in discussions with TWX about a deal to outsource some of its news-gathering operations to CNN. <br /></p>
<p>CBS overall option implied volatility of 33 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional fluctuations.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/08/option-update-cbs-volatility-flat-as-shares-near-record-lows/">Option Update: CBS volatility flat as shares near record lows</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/08/option-update-cbs-volatility-flat-as-shares-near-record-lows/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1161449/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/08/option-update-cbs-volatility-flat-as-shares-near-record-lows/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbs</category><category>cnn</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: Rupert Murdoch will get the last laugh on his many critics]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/media-world-rupert-murdoch-will-get-the-last-laugh-on-his-many/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/media-world-rupert-murdoch-will-get-the-last-laugh-on-his-many/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/media-world-rupert-murdoch-will-get-the-last-laugh-on-his-many/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" alt="" />Super Tuesday had a super payoff for CNN.<br /><br />The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) cable channel attracted 3.6 million viewers, beating out Fox News Channel which had 3.5 million and MSNBC -- which I prefer -- which had 2.1 million viewers between 8 and 11 p.m., according to <em><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/tv/la-et-ratings8feb08,1,879951.story?ctrack=3&amp;cset=true">The Los Angeles Times.</a> </em>Before you NPR listeners raise your Starbucks cafe au laits in triumph, remember that one night does not make a trend. Fox still rules the ratings roost overall.<br /><br />This does underscore a few trends. One is that Fox is no longer the only voice of conservative thought on cable TV with the likes of Lou Dobbs on CNN and Pat Buchanan on MSNBC. Also, the far right brand of conservatism espoused by Fox may be out of favor. The presumptive Republican nominee John McCain is hardly a favorite of the far right even though he's trying really hard to mend fences ahead of the general election. <br /><br />News Corp., though, is not hurting. During the second-quarter, operating income from its cable channels rose 34% to $1.24 billion as higher revenue from Fox News Channel and the other networks more than off set the startup costs at Fox Business Network and the Big Ten Network. <br /><br />When Rupert Murdoch's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) first announced plans to start a cable channel to compete against CNBC, I was psyched. At least, I thought, there would be an alternative to the<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"> General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) channel's must yell TV format. Boy was I wrong.<br /><br />In its brief existence, Fox Business Network has largely distinguished itself for being undistinguished, making some <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/clips/fox-business-newss-apple+amd-flub-323889.php">unbelievably stupid mistakes </a>such as confusing<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas"> Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas"> AAPL</a>) with Abu Dhabi. More recently, the anchors of the show "Fox Business Happy Hour", Cody Willard and Tracy Byrnes, appeared <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/clips/fox-business-newss-apple+amd-flub-323889.php">a little too happy</a> during a segment on of all things drunk driving. Call it an occupational hazard of hosting a show at a bar. Missing in all of this merriment was one crucial thing: breaking news. </p>
<p><em>(Note: I crossed paths with Willard and Byrnes at TheStreet.com though I never worked directly with either of them.)<br /></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/media-world-rupert-murdoch-will-get-the-last-laugh-on-his-many/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Media World: Rupert Murdoch will get the last laugh on his many critics</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/media-world-rupert-murdoch-will-get-the-last-laugh-on-his-many/">Media World: Rupert Murdoch will get the last laugh on his many critics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/news-corp-shares-move-higher/story.aspx?guid=%7B1B93017D-9741-4F50-815F-0BB4F61AF0C6%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/media-world-rupert-murdoch-will-get-the-last-laugh-on-his-many/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1110421/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/media-world-rupert-murdoch-will-get-the-last-laugh-on-his-many/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>cnn</category><category>featured</category><category>fox business network</category><category>fox business news</category><category>fox news channel</category><category>FoxBusinessNetwork</category><category>FoxBusinessNews</category><category>FoxNewsChannel</category><category>ge</category><category>nws</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner's day of reckoning nears]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/time-warners-day-of-reckoning-nears/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/time-warners-day-of-reckoning-nears/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/time-warners-day-of-reckoning-nears/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/time-warner-twx-logo.gif" alt="" />Time Warner Inc.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) new Chief Executive Jeffrey Bewkes will have plenty to talk about when the world's largest media conglomerate -- and parent of BloggingStocks -- <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=TWX:US&amp;sid=aFjgR7OS018g">reports fourth quarter results tomorrow.</a>
<p>The results themselves aren't going to be anything spectacular. Analysts expect earnings of 29 cents on revenue of $12.64 billion, according to Thomson Financial. As usual, the focus will be on AOL, in particular how much gains in advertising offset the declines in the dial-up business. Also, the company will need to detail its plans for the cable business which may be hurt by an economic slowdown. The future of the publishing business also remains in doubt as advertisers continue to flee print for online media.  </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) $44.6 billion bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) only adds to the confusion. Will investors give Bewkes enough time to transform AOL's business to an ad-supported model? The strategy is the correct one though it was initiated about two years too late. But given the premium that Microsoft is offering for Yahoo, investors are bound to pressure Bewkes to make a similar deal for AOL, which today bought the online <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/aol-acquires-buyat-e-commerce-marketing/story.aspx?guid=%7BBA4E1F70%2D0E2D%2D41AB%2D9D8B%2D7F931D279895%7D&amp;siteid=aolpfaolpf1">marketing company buy.at</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/time-warners-day-of-reckoning-nears/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner's day of reckoning nears</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/time-warners-day-of-reckoning-nears/">Time Warner's day of reckoning nears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=TWX:US&amp;sid=aFjgR7OS018g>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/time-warners-day-of-reckoning-nears/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1107466/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/time-warners-day-of-reckoning-nears/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>cnn</category><category>JeffreyBewkes</category><category>msft</category><category>time inc</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>twx</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Weather Channel for sale, only $5 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/the-weather-channel-for-sale-only-5-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/the-weather-channel-for-sale-only-5-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/the-weather-channel-for-sale-only-5-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p>The Weather Channel, held by family-owned Landmark Communications of Virginia, is being auctioned off along with the rest of Landmark, and could fetch $5 billion. A number of public companies may have an interest. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/03/business/media/03weather.html">According to</a> <em>The New York Times</em>, firms looking at the property include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">Comcast</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>).</p>
<p>The Weather Channel is attractive for two reasons. The first is that there are very few large, independent cable networks. Most, including CNN, CNBC, ESPN, and MTV, are already owned by media giants. The chance to pick up another large advertising-supported 24-hour product should be very attractive.</p>
<p>The second tremendous selling point is that weather.com, the online arm of the company, is one of the most-visited sites in the U.S. In November, comScore ranked it as the 16th most-visited website, with 34.1 million unique visitors. That puts it ahead of ESPN.com, CBS.com, and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>) digital properties.</p>
<p>The Weather Channel is a rare prize. The bidding should be spirited.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/the-weather-channel-for-sale-only-5-billion/">The Weather Channel for sale, only $5 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/03/business/media/03weather.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/the-weather-channel-for-sale-only-5-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1076076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/the-weather-channel-for-sale-only-5-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cmcsa</category><category>CNBC</category><category>CNN</category><category>comcast</category><category>ESPN</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MTV</category><category>television</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>weather</category><category>Weather Channel</category><category>WeatherChannel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would you vote for Lou Dobbs for president?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p>Sources close to CNN broadcast journalist/commentator Lou Dobbs said he is seriously considering a run for the U.S. presidency in 2008, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119515461427494522.html"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported.</a><br /><br />Dobbs, who formerly hosted CNN's <em><a href="http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Moneyline+(TV+series)">MoneyLine</a></em> business news show and currently hosts CNN's <em><a href="http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/">Lou Dobbs Tonight</a></em> has seen both his ratings and his name recognition rise after his work's focus turned away from news reporting and anchoring and toward political and economic commentary. <br /><br />Dobbs, an independent, displays an ideology and a political world view that many have characterized as a modified hybrid of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Nader">Ralph Nader</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Nader">Pat Buchanan</a> -- i.e. populism combined with strong views against free trade (or current trade frameworks) and against illegal immigration. <br /><br />Dobbs is a frequent critic of both the Democratic and Republican parties, which he argues don't represent the interests of the typical person or the middle class. His show's website describes him as "an independent populist and the leading media advocate for working men and women, their families, our middle class and the American way of life."<br /><br /><strong>Political Analysis:</strong> Unless there's a tidal wave of discontent in the American electorate not tallied by pollsters, Dobbs, as a third-party candidate or as an Independent, has virtually no chance of being elected president of the United States. Although his name recognition is rising and he has a positive public image, it's highly unlikely Dobbs could assemble the campaign staff and money required to compete effectively against Democratic and Republican parties' nominees. <br /><br />However, this is not to say that Dobbs could not broaden the discourse, i.e. "force the discussion of less-publicized issues" during a debate. Dobbs could accomplish this, but it must be emphasized that making points in a debate is a much easier task than receiving enough votes to win the electoral college vote for U.S. president.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/">Would you vote for Lou Dobbs for president?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1041890/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Buchanan</category><category>business news shows</category><category>Cable News Network</category><category>CNN</category><category>commentary</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Dobbs</category><category>elections</category><category>free trade</category><category>immigration</category><category>Independents</category><category>Lou Dobbs</category><category>Lou Dobbs Tonight</category><category>middle class</category><category>Nader</category><category>Pat Buchanan</category><category>political commentary</category><category>politics</category><category>polling</category><category>polls</category><category>populism</category><category>presidential election</category><category>Ralph Nader</category><category>Republican Party</category><category>Republicans</category><category>trade</category><category>U.S. politics</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><category>working class</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CNN plans to expand on the cheap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/cnn-plans-to-expand-on-the-cheap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/cnn-plans-to-expand-on-the-cheap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/cnn-plans-to-expand-on-the-cheap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>CNN Worldwide, a part of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) franchise<a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/cnn-worldwide-to-boost-news-staff/n20071114133509990014">, is expanding</a> its staff of correspondents by 10% as it looks to increase its original content. The investment is said to be under $10 million and will add about 16 correspondents  to its staff of 150.<br /><br />About two months ago, CNN announced it was abandoning the relationship with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reuters-group-plc-american-depositary-shares/rtrsy/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Reuters Group PLC</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reuters-group-plc-american-depositary-shares/rtrsy/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">RTRSY</a>) and would instead bolster its own news capabilities. The idea is to capture more advertising by owning the content as the content can simultaneously be pushed out over multiple distribution platforms.<br /><br />What is interesting here, is that the focus is in the United Arab Emirates, where CNN operates CNN.com Arabic. It will use some of the investment for a digital production unit in London, as well as to increase its staff in Hong Kong. Mexico City and Johannesburg. Additional staff, and news operations are being planned in Belgium, Poland, India, Afghanistan, Nigeria, Kenya, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. <br /><br /> <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/cnn-plans-to-expand-on-the-cheap/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CNN plans to expand on the cheap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/cnn-plans-to-expand-on-the-cheap/">CNN plans to expand on the cheap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/cnn-worldwide-to-boost-news-staff/n20071114133509990014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/cnn-plans-to-expand-on-the-cheap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1040191/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/cnn-plans-to-expand-on-the-cheap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cable News</category><category>CNN</category><category>CNN expanding</category><category>CNN International</category><category>Reuters</category><category>RTRSY</category><category>Second Life</category><category>SecondLife</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Has America fallen into the dreaded 'R' word?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/has-america-fallen-into-the-dreaded-r-word/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/has-america-fallen-into-the-dreaded-r-word/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/has-america-fallen-into-the-dreaded-r-word/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/money101807.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Over the past several months Wall Street experts have been debating whether or not America is headed to a recession, and according to a new CNN poll, a large percentage of Americans think that the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/nearly-half-of-americans-see-recession/20071018115109990001">country has already entered a recession</a>.<br /><br />Concerns over a possible recession have been lingering for most of the year, as housing prices have steadily fallen, while prices for gas and food continue to rise. But the sentiment really started to take hold this summer as the subprime mortgage meltdown started to spread. These concerns are only going to grow today after a weak <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) <a href="http://bac.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/bank-of-america-misses-earnings-how-now-to-play-bac/">earnings release</a>.<br /><br />As the weak housing market continues to deteriorate CNN finds that nearly half of all Americans are now under the impression the country is already in a recession. According to its recent poll, 46 percent of U.S. residents believe the country is in a recession, with 51 percent thinking we have not.<br /><br />The report also showed that black Americans are taking a much more pessimistic stance on the current economy. CNN shows that 69% of all black Americans feel the country is in recession, while only 42% of white Americans think this is the case.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/has-america-fallen-into-the-dreaded-r-word/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Has America fallen into the dreaded 'R' word?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/has-america-fallen-into-the-dreaded-r-word/">Has America fallen into the dreaded 'R' word?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-execs18oct18,1,2494901.story?coll=la-headlines-business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/nearly-half-of-americans-see-recession/20071018115109990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/has-america-fallen-into-the-dreaded-r-word/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1016505/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/has-america-fallen-into-the-dreaded-r-word/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>AlanGreenspan</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>CNN</category><category>CNN Poll</category><category>CnnPoll</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>credit crunch and recession</category><category>CreditCrunch</category><category>CreditCrunchAndRecession</category><category>Dept. of Labor Data</category><category>Dept.OfLaborData</category><category>featured</category><category>gas prices</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>Housing</category><category>Recession</category><category>sub prime</category><category>SubPrime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CNBC-Fox Business Network 'battle' is overblown]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/cnbc-fox-business-network-battle-is-overblown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/cnbc-fox-business-network-battle-is-overblown/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/cnbc-fox-business-network-battle-is-overblown/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/fox.jpg" />When Fox Busines Network debuts on October 15, it will be a fly buzzing around the elephant that is CNBC. All the talk about the looming war, battle, or clash of the titans is hype.</p>
<p>As <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_41/b4053089.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_businessweek+exclusives">BusinessWeek</a> points out, Fox Business Network will have one-third of CNBC's reach and will also lag behind Bloomberg TV. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch has said his channel will be geared toward Main Street instead of CNBC's Wall Street focus. I don't know what that statement means. CNBC's mission is to try and convince individual investors they must act <strong>RIGHT NOW</strong> to avoid financial ruin or to gain immediate riches. That seems to speak directly to Main Street.</p>
<p>Murdoch, though, is a patient man. People thought he was nuts to take on<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"> Time Warner Inc.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CNN, and now Fox News rules the ratings. He keeps the <em>New York Post</em> going because he wants to stick it to the liberal media establishment A.K.A. <em>The New York Times</em>. Power motivates him almost as much as money. That's why the media tycoon doesn't care if Fox Business News isn't immediately profitable or even if it takes some time to get into the black. He's trying to prove a point. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The biggest challenge facing Fox Business News is the same one facing the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) cable channel: attracting an audience. For most people who don't read stock market blogs, business news is pretty dry stuff. That's why CNBC's anchors always yell the news written in their teleprompters to make things seem more exciting. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/cnbc-fox-business-network-battle-is-overblown/">CNBC-Fox Business Network 'battle' is overblown</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_41/b4053089.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_businessweek+exclusives>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/cnbc-fox-business-network-battle-is-overblown/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1004899/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/cnbc-fox-business-network-battle-is-overblown/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bloomberg LP</category><category>Bloomberg TV</category><category>BloombergLp</category><category>BloombergTv</category><category>cnbc</category><category>CNN</category><category>featured</category><category>Fox</category><category>Fox Business</category><category>Fox Business Network</category><category>Fox Business News</category><category>FoxBusiness</category><category>FoxBusinessNetwork</category><category>FoxBusinessNews</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner (TWX) unit is pondering the future of ... Time Warner]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p>After looking through some web postings internally, there was a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/09/17/news/companies/twx_bewkes.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007091709">very interesting article</a> regarding <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=TWX&amp;source=story_quote_link">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=TWX&amp;source=story_quote_link">TWX</a>) that can be indirectly inferred to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">Time Warner Cable Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">TWC</a>) and all units of the media conglomerate. The article "For Time Warner, a time to break up?" is available on the CNNMoney.com website, but is really a <em>FORTUNE Magazine </em>article. <em>FORTUNE </em>and CNN are both properties of Time Warner Inc. <br /><br />The article is basically predicting that Jeff Bewkes will soon replace Dick Parsons as the Chairman &amp; CEO of the parent company. It also points to a recent anvil weighing on the transition -- the sagging stock price of Time Warner. The truth is that the first real wave of the transition took hold in 2006 when the company separated Time Warner Cable and used financial leverage to buy back billions of dollars worth of stock. That buyback did continue, but 2006 was the year the buyback was felt the most as the stock rose nearly 50% from its lows.<br /><br />While the article does not call for major changes, it notes how Time Warner produces more cash flow than its rivals, although <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=NWS&amp;source=story_quote_link">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=NWS&amp;source=story_quote_link">NWS</a>) and <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=DIS&amp;source=story_quote_link">Walt Disney Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=DIS&amp;source=story_quote_link">DIS</a>) have outperformed as stocks. The article goes on to mention that Bewkes has noted that other media break-ups may not be yielding much upside, and that he agrees with Parsons for now that the combined entity is worth more than the pieces as unaffiliated entities.<br /><br />Regardless of the many twists and turns in the article, this seemed odd coming out of <em>FORTUNE</em>. I laid out my own <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/whats-next-for-aol-at-time-warner/">scenario where the company could float a portion of AOL</a> as a tracking stock, a scenario that still seems quite likely. Rather than an entire spin-out of the cable assets, it seems to me that the media giant should at least maintain a large stake (if not an outright 50% plus 1 vote majority) in the cable company, and that any analyst calls to the contrary are misplaced. It is easy to call for break-ups in a bull market to unlock more value, but there are many more defensive and stabilizing strategies for a giant to weather harder times. <br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/">Time Warner (TWX) unit is pondering the future of ... Time Warner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/09/17/news/companies/twx_bewkes.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007091709>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/991308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>cnn</category><category>dis</category><category>fortune</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>twx</category><category>walt disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Oprah Winfrey redeem Michael Vick?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img height="133" alt="Oprah Winfrey" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/about_photoid_top.gif" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Suspended Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick's best chance at public redemption lies with Oprah Winfrey. At least that's the conclusion of <em>Detroit Free Press</em> columnist <a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070829/COL08/708290344/1081">Drew Sharp</a>, who makes a convincing argument that "now that pop culture dictates news judgment, it's only appropriate that a pop culture diva quite possibly holds the key to Michael Vick's NFL future."</p>
<p>Vick should take Sharp's advice. If Vick goes on Oprah, his handlers would no doubt encourage him to cry, talk about "finding Jesus" and encourage young people to make smart decisions. Unfortunately for Vick, the road to redemption starts with the talk show queen. Vick will have to spend the next few months apologizing until the American public is sick of seeing his face.</p>
<p>The question for Vick's handlers is where to go after Oprah. </p>
<p>Will he try to reach NFL fans through <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney Co.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ESPN cable network or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) Fox?</p>
<p>What about the morning shows? You can bet that ABC, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Electric Co.</a>'s (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> GE</a>) NBC and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS</a>) would kill to land an interview with the disgraced athlete. "Dateline" and "60 Minutes" are probably working on stories about the evils of dog fighting. The story also continues to be the gift that keeps on giving for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CNN, Fox News channel, and MSNBC.</p>
<p>But I am not sure that all of the apologizing in the world can save Vick's NFL career. People understand that young, rich athletes misbehave and occasionally break the law. But Vick's behavior was so heinous that it defies explanation.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/">Can Oprah Winfrey redeem Michael Vick?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070829/COL08/708290344/1081>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/976652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>atlanta falcons</category><category>AtlantaFalcons</category><category>broadcast journalism</category><category>BroadcastJournalism</category><category>CBS</category><category>CNN</category><category>DIS</category><category>featured</category><category>FOX NEWS</category><category>FoxNews</category><category>GE</category><category>journalism</category><category>michael vick</category><category>MichaelVick</category><category>NBC</category><category>nfl</category><category>NWS</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google (GOOG) gets CNN exclusive ad pact]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/google-goog-gets-cnn-exclusive-ad-pact/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/google-goog-gets-cnn-exclusive-ad-pact/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/google-goog-gets-cnn-exclusive-ad-pact/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles?id=n20070828082709990017">has signed</a> an exclusive pact with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CNN unit to use Google's AdSense advertising program for text-based ads. <br /><br />The AdSense service will place contextually relevant ads alongside CNN.com content, allowing both small and large advertisers to target CNN.com specifically. Google will serve as the exclusive provider of auction-based text advertisements throughout CNN.com. <br /><br />Without seeing the contracts it is impossible to know how this ad money will be divided, and it isn't known if Google had to pony up cash or any guarantees to get this on an exclusive basis. The Google pact isn't exactly a huge surprise either because if you look at the CNN.com site, its search function already has the "POWERED BY GOOGLE" feature.<br /><br />It may be a surprise that CNN isn't using the Advertising.com platform, although it would seem a safe bet that this could fuel all sorts of speculation between the two platforms. After the strong advertising reach the company showed <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/time-warners-internet-superstar-advertising-com/">in the most recent comScore data</a> it would seem quite a strong platform. This also brings more 'outside revenues' rather than one Time Warner unit generating revenue for another unit. CNN is not part of AOL so this would 'likely' be independent of any future arrangements between the two companies.<br /><br /><strong>Update (Aug 29): An email sent to me from a CNN employee states that the relationship is still there and this will not affect the Advertising.com pact with CNN.</strong><br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a partner in 24/7 Wall St., LLC; he produces the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/special_situation_newsletter.html">Special Situation Investing Newsletter</a> and does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/google-goog-gets-cnn-exclusive-ad-pact/">Google (GOOG) gets CNN exclusive ad pact</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/cnncom-inks-multi-year-advertising/n20070828082709990017>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/google-goog-gets-cnn-exclusive-ad-pact/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/975596/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/google-goog-gets-cnn-exclusive-ad-pact/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AdSense</category><category>Advertising.com</category><category>AOL</category><category>CNN</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
