<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Now the Time to Buy into GE Stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/is-now-the-time-to-buy-into-ge-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/is-now-the-time-to-buy-into-ge-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/is-now-the-time-to-buy-into-ge-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/ge-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />General Electric Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) was the big earnings reporter today. Its results unfortunately failed in the eyes of investors. You may or may not agree with the reaction to the stock, but for now, shares of GE are being punished. At the time of this writing, in afternoon trading, the company was down 3.4%. The more compelling news is the volume: it's way above average. Does this mean you should liquidate your holding in the conglomerate immediately?</p>
<p>I've made mistakes trading GE in the past, I should admit upfront, but I own a long-term position, and I have to say I have no desire based on current data to get rid of it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/is-now-the-time-to-buy-into-ge-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Now the Time to Buy into GE Stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/is-now-the-time-to-buy-into-ge-stock/">Is Now the Time to Buy into GE Stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/ge-earnings-edge-past-estimates-revenues-fall/19442592/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/is-now-the-time-to-buy-into-ge-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19443219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/is-now-the-time-to-buy-into-ge-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conglomerate</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>jeff immelt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE matches reduced expectation and people cheer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/ge-matches-reduced-expecation-and-people-cheer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/ge-matches-reduced-expecation-and-people-cheer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/ge-matches-reduced-expecation-and-people-cheer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><img width="125" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="125" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" alt="" />Maybe the economy is not quite ready to fall off a cliff quite yet, though it appears to be heading in that direction. At least, that's the message <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/ge-profit-falls-22-pct-meeting-lowered/207215">this morning</a> coming from Dow stalwart <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>).<br /><br />General Electric, whose shares have been pounded lately because of concerns about its financing unit, today reported an in-line quarter.<br /><br />In a press release, GE Chief Executive Jeffrey Immelt, whose <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aOYMwzd_LgOs&amp;refer=home">job may be in jeopardy</a>, pointed out that the conglomerate was<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/template.NDM/news/more/?javax.portlet.tpst=0b2c9a4dd5f89b80977dd367cc87b42f_ws_MX&amp;javax.portlet.prp_0b2c9a4dd5f89b80977dd367cc87b42f_viewID=news_view_popup&amp;javax.portlet.prp_0b2c9a4dd5f89b80977dd367cc87b42f_newsLang=en&amp;javax.portlet.prp_0b2c9a4dd5f89b80977dd367cc87b42f_ndmHsc=v2*A1221044400000*B1223671679000*DgroupByDate*J2*L1*N1000837*ZGeneral%20electric&amp;javax.portlet.prp_0b2c9a4dd5f89b80977dd367cc87b42f_newsId=20081010005221&amp;beanID=202776713&amp;viewID=news_view_popup&amp;javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&amp;javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken"> "on track"</a> to meet its revised -- reduced -- guidance issued September 25. He also pointed out, <span id="bwanpa35">"</span>We have taken a number of steps to protect investors from the downside risk in financial services, and we have ways to mitigate potential disruptions in infrastructure and media markets, but the environment remains challenging."<br /><br />GE also plans to sustain its dividend through the end of next year.<br /><br />"We have big backlogs, great products, stable service revenue, strong operating discipline, an unmatched global position and multiple revenue streams. As a result, the Company is well positioned to perform in a very difficult environment, and our Board has approved our plan to sustain the GE dividend through 2009,<span id="bwanpa36">"</span> Immelt said.<br /><br />Despite the positive spin, the results were pretty dreadful. Profit from continuing operations fell 12 percent to $4.48 billion, or 45 cents a share, from $5.11 billion, or 50 cents. Many businesses including Global Finance fell by double-digit percentage points. Cash flow from operations plunged 18 percent during the first nine months of the year.<br /><br />How sad is it that meeting reduced expectations is seen as great news?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/ge-matches-reduced-expecation-and-people-cheer/">GE matches reduced expectation and people cheer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/ge-profit-falls-22-pct-meeting-lowered/207215>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/ge-matches-reduced-expecation-and-people-cheer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1338633/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/ge-matches-reduced-expecation-and-people-cheer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conglomerate</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeffrey Immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner: 1 plus 1 = 1]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>Today's <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-down-on-better-than-expected-profit/">TimeWarner earnings announcement</a> shows the disappointment that results when shareholders expect a corporate strategyand instead get a conglomerate. With TWX down 1.72% in the earnings announcement's&nbsp;wake, the Chinese water torturecontinues.&nbsp; How so?</p>
<p>When a <strong>corporate strategy</strong> is well-conceived and well-executed, there isa strong economic reason for businesses to be under the same corporate umbrella. Simply put, corporate strategy is aboutcreating value by sharing important capabilities across business units. For example, Wal-Mart gets big volume discountsby purchasing in big quantities from its suppliers. Wal-Mart is also good at measuring what items sell in its storesand which ones don't and stocking the shelves of each store accordingly. Wal-Mart's sustained financial&nbsp;excellenceresults from its ability to share these capabilities across its discount retailing, grocery, and pharmacy businesses.This sharing gives Wal-Mart a sustainable competitive advantage, keeping its costs below its competitors.</p>
<p>Bycontrast, a <strong>conglomerate</strong> holds a diverse collection of businesses&nbsp;among which there is verylittle sharing.&nbsp;The ostensible reason for the businesses being under the same corporate umbrella is that thedifferent businesses can predictably offset each other's earnings cycles.&nbsp;When one business is down, another oneis up and vice versa. The net effect is to smooth earnings.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner: 1 plus 1 = 1</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/">Time Warner: 1 plus 1 = 1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 May 2006 15:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/614562/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conglomerate</category><category>earnings annoucnement</category><category>earnings announcement</category><category>EarningsAnnoucnement</category><category>EarningsAnnouncement</category><category>economics</category><category>economies of scale</category><category>EconomiesOfScale</category><category>market</category><category>market reaction</category><category>MarketReaction</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner earnings</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerEarnings</category><category>twx</category><category>twx earnings</category><category>TwxEarnings</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 15:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
