<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[General Mills Likes Yoplait So Much It's Buying 50% of the Company]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/18/general-mills-likes-yoplait-so-much-it-is-buying-50-of-the-comp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/18/general-mills-likes-yoplait-so-much-it-is-buying-50-of-the-comp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/18/general-mills-likes-yoplait-so-much-it-is-buying-50-of-the-comp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/03/yogurt.jpg" />General Mills (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-mills-inc/gis/nys">GIS</a>) is buying a 50% stake in Yoplait from PAI Partners for roughly $1.1 billion, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/17/us-yoplait-idUSTRE72G5VK20110317">Reuters </a>reported Thursday, citing sources close to the deal.<br />
<br />
The deal is a nice fit for both companies. Yoplait is second to Danone (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/danone-s-adr/danoy/nao">DANOY</a>) in the yogurt market. General Mills has the industry presence to promote the Yoplait brand, something that would benefit PAI.<br />
<br />
For General Mills, Yoplait would add an another revenue stream to an already diversified conglomerate. Some of General Mills' products include cereals, Haagen-Dazs ice cream, Green Giant vegetables and Progresso soup. The company has already been distributing Yoplait for 30 years, so the distribution network is already in place.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/18/general-mills-likes-yoplait-so-much-it-is-buying-50-of-the-comp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Mills Likes Yoplait So Much It's Buying 50% of the Company</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/18/general-mills-likes-yoplait-so-much-it-is-buying-50-of-the-comp/">General Mills Likes Yoplait So Much It's Buying 50% of the Company</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/18/general-mills-likes-yoplait-so-much-it-is-buying-50-of-the-comp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19883491/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/18/general-mills-likes-yoplait-so-much-it-is-buying-50-of-the-comp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodity prices</category><category>competition</category><category>consumer</category><category>deals</category><category>featured</category><category>food industry</category><category>General Mills</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Yoplait</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's Recalls Collectible Shrek Glasses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/shrek240.jpg" alt="" />Reportedly, McDonald's (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) is recalling 12 million of its collectible <em>Shrek</em> glasses thanks to cadmium. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the voluntary recall early this morning because the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/mcdonalds-pulls-cadmium-tainted-shrek/1098493">painted design contains cadmium</a>.</p>
<p>What a deal, cadmium poisoning and a collector's glass all for a mere $2 ... those marketing geniuses at McDonald's ... what will they think of next?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McDonald's Recalls Collectible Shrek Glasses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/">McDonald's Recalls Collectible Shrek Glasses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19503461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadmium</category><category>consumer</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>recall</category><category>Shrek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Prices Slip During April]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/us-dollarnote-240.jpg" />The Labor Department's recently released April consumer inflation figures may cast a bit of a bearish shadow on the Street. Consumer <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-consumer-prices-fall-01-in-april-2010-05-19">prices dropped</a> 0.1% last month, on a seasonally adjusted basis. This is the first decline in the consumer price index since March 2009. The impetus for the drop was a decline in energy, housing, auto and apparel prices. <br />
<br />
That said, the consumer price index has increased 2.2% in the past year. What's more, the core CPI, which excludes the volatile food and energy prices, was unchanged, pushing the year-over-year increase in core inflation lower to 0.9%. This benchmark is at its lowest since January 1966.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Prices Slip During April</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/">Consumer Prices Slip During April</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 May 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19483129/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer data</category><category>consumer price index</category><category>CPI</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Spending Logs Largest Increase in Months as Savings Dwindle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/commercedept.jpg"  alt="" />According to the Commerce Department, consumer spending <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/consumer-spending-advances-sharply-but/719129">increased in March</a> by the largest amount in five months.</p>
<p>Consumer spending increased 0.6% in March, which matched expectations. While this is the good news, the bad news is that the gains appear to have been driven by a depletion of savings, which dropped to the lowest level in 18 months. The personal savings rate fell to 2.7% of post-tax incomes, the lowest level since September 2008. Personal incomes increased a mere 0.3%, which presents concern about minuscule income growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Spending Logs Largest Increase in Months as Savings Dwindle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/">Consumer Spending Logs Largest Increase in Months as Savings Dwindle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 May 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19462260/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic data</category><category>savings</category><category>savings accounts</category><category>spending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fourth Quarter GDP Revised Higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/construction.jpg" alt="" />The Commerce Department gave us a <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704625004575089220715521384.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">nice little surprise this morning</a>, revising up its fourth-quarter estimate of the Gross Domestic Product. Economic activity grew by 5.9% during the fourth quarter, which was the fastest rate since the third quarter of 2003. Last month, the Commerce Department estimated that the GDP rose by an annual 5.7% during the fourth quarter. <br />
<br />
Here is the thing, this figure was in line with expectations of economists, so all of the glad handing may be a bit premature. Inventory liquidation slowed more than experts expected, which contributed the most percentage points to the GDP since the fourth quarter of 1987. Business spending increased 6.9%, which was far better than the earlier estimate of 2.9%. It added 0.62 percentage point to the GDP.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-higher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fourth Quarter GDP Revised Higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-higher/">Fourth Quarter GDP Revised Higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19374865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>featured</category><category>GDP</category><category>Gross Domestic Product</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumers Find Credit Trouble in November]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/consumers-find-credit-trouble-in-november/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/consumers-find-credit-trouble-in-november/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/consumers-find-credit-trouble-in-november/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/05/credit-200dr030507.jpg" alt="" />Optimism around holiday spending, strength in the stock market for the second half of 2009 and wishful thinking about the economic climate aren't going to be enough to turn the situation around. And, there's more to the story than the 10% unemployment rate. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2009-12-29-credit-card-payments-slip_N.htm">Moody's Investor Services said Tuesday that more people fell behind</a> on their credit card payments in November. <br />
<br />
The charge-off rate on credit cards increased to 10.56% last month, according to the Moody's Credit Card Index. It had fallen in September and October, settling at 10.04% before ticking back up last month. Fortunately, this remains below the June level of 10.76%, a record high.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/consumers-find-credit-trouble-in-november/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumers Find Credit Trouble in November</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/consumers-find-credit-trouble-in-november/">Consumers Find Credit Trouble in November</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2009-12-29-credit-card-payments-slip_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/consumers-find-credit-trouble-in-november/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19297577/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/consumers-find-credit-trouble-in-november/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charge-offs</category><category>ChargeOffs</category><category>consumer</category><category>consumer credit</category><category>consumer credit industry</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>credit card debt</category><category>credit cards</category><category>credit crisis</category><category>delinquencies</category><category>delinquency</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Moodys</category><category>Moodys Investors Services</category><category>MoodysInvestorsServices</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retail sales rise more than expected last month]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/retail-sales-rise-more-than-expected-last-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/retail-sales-rise-more-than-expected-last-month/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/retail-sales-rise-more-than-expected-last-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="november retail sales" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/shops.jpg" />The retail industry got some good news today as the Commerce Department announced that <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/stronger-retail-sales-and-sentiment/811170?v=aolrss">retail sales rose more than expected</a> last month.<br /><br />Before today's report, analysts had predicted that we would see a 0.7% jump in retail sales last month, but the actual figures showed a much higher 1.3% increase during the month. This comes on the heels of a 1.1% increase in October.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/retail-sales-rise-more-than-expected-last-month/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail sales rise more than expected last month</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/retail-sales-rise-more-than-expected-last-month/">Retail sales rise more than expected last month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/retail-sales-rise-more-than-expected-last-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19275543/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/retail-sales-rise-more-than-expected-last-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerConfidence</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>featured</category><category>production</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Recovery now more dependent on consumers than ever]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/recovery-now-more-dependent-on-consumers-than-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/recovery-now-more-dependent-on-consumers-than-ever/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/recovery-now-more-dependent-on-consumers-than-ever/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shopping_safeway_240.jpg" alt="" />Consumer spending may be down, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-11-consumer-spending_N.htm" target="_blank">but its share of U.S. economic activity has increased</a>. So, we're now more dependent than before on the average Joe's open wallet to guide us out of the recession. A year ago, consumer spending accounted for 70% of the U.S. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/economy/">economy</a>. Since then, it has edged up to 71%. The long-term average is approximately 65%. </p>
<p>The increase in consumer spending's share of the economy indicates that other sectors fell harder. Business and construction spending on new equipment have constricted at a record rate since 2008. This isn't unusual, though, as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/consumerspending/">consumer spending</a> tends to take a larger piece of the economic pie during downturns. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/recovery-now-more-dependent-on-consumers-than-ever/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Recovery now more dependent on consumers than ever</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/recovery-now-more-dependent-on-consumers-than-ever/">Recovery now more dependent on consumers than ever</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-11-consumer-spending_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/recovery-now-more-dependent-on-consumers-than-ever/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19192534/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/recovery-now-more-dependent-on-consumers-than-ever/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>consumers</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>economic activity</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicActivity</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>economics</category><category>personal spending</category><category>PersonalSpending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart stocks shelves with Hard Candy cosmetics ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/wal-mart-stocks-shelves-with-hard-candy-cosmetics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/wal-mart-stocks-shelves-with-hard-candy-cosmetics/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/wal-mart-stocks-shelves-with-hard-candy-cosmetics/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="133" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/walmart_storefront_justinsullivan_20071009.jpg" />Hard Candy is coming to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores </a>(NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), and I don't mean Jolly Ranchers. The high-end name in trendy cosmetics, famous for bringing unusual colors to ladies' palettes in the late 1990s, is now bringing a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57H5ZS20090818" target="_blank">specially created line</a> to the discount retailer. <br /><br />Hard Candy products will hit shelves in 3,000 Wal-Mart stores next month, and will be available internationally by the spring. Products, from gold lipstick to bright green eyeliner, will range from $5 to $10 and target women between 18 and 35 (oooh! I'm just under the wire!).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/wal-mart-stocks-shelves-with-hard-candy-cosmetics/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wal-Mart stocks shelves with Hard Candy cosmetics </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/wal-mart-stocks-shelves-with-hard-candy-cosmetics/">Wal-Mart stocks shelves with Hard Candy cosmetics </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57H5ZS20090818>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/wal-mart-stocks-shelves-with-hard-candy-cosmetics/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19133975/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/wal-mart-stocks-shelves-with-hard-candy-cosmetics/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>cosmetics</category><category>hard candy</category><category>HardCandy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could solid earnings help Starbucks brew some momentum?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/could-solid-earnings-help-starbucks-brew-some-momentum/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/could-solid-earnings-help-starbucks-brew-some-momentum/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/could-solid-earnings-help-starbucks-brew-some-momentum/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/starbucks_latte.jpg" width="220" height="246" />Coffee king <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) is one of the myriad companies posting earnings today, as it is slated to release its third-quarter earnings report after the closing bell this afternoon. Analysts expect the company to report earnings of 19 cents per share, excluding special items. Such results would outpace the firm's year-ago earnings by three cents per share. </p>
<p>The company is expected to post these earnings in the face of the recession, as cost cuts and store closures are thought to have insulated the company's profits. The results will also be closely monitored to see the impact of the company's main competitors -- which includes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/could-solid-earnings-help-starbucks-brew-some-momentum/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Could solid earnings help Starbucks brew some momentum?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/could-solid-earnings-help-starbucks-brew-some-momentum/">Could solid earnings help Starbucks brew some momentum?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/could-solid-earnings-help-starbucks-brew-some-momentum/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104880/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/could-solid-earnings-help-starbucks-brew-some-momentum/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>coffee shop</category><category>consumer</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer confidence inches higher in March]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/consumer-confidence-inches-higher-in-march/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/consumer-confidence-inches-higher-in-march/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/consumer-confidence-inches-higher-in-march/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shopping_safeway_240.jpg" alt="consumer confidence" /><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/consumer-confidence-holds-steady-in/406514">Consumer confidence</a> was able to break a three month streak of declines by inching slightly higher during the month of March. <br /><br />While it is great to see consumers gaining a little bit of confidence again, it is still too early to get carried away. Currently, The Consumer Confidence Index is sitting at 26. This is above the 25.3 reading in February, but below the anticipated 28 that analysts had been predicting.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/consumer-confidence-inches-higher-in-march/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer confidence inches higher in March</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/consumer-confidence-inches-higher-in-march/">Consumer confidence inches higher in March</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/consumer-confidence-inches-higher-in-march/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1504033/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/consumer-confidence-inches-higher-in-march/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerConfidence</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Doomsday Scenario: Rotten Apple, hedge fund lies, bad case of natural gas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/doomsday-scenario-rotten-apple-hedge-fund-lies-bad-case-of-na/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/doomsday-scenario-rotten-apple-hedge-fund-lies-bad-case-of-na/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/doomsday-scenario-rotten-apple-hedge-fund-lies-bad-case-of-na/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shortstories/" rel="tag">Short Stories</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/smartphones/" rel="tag">Smartphones</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/iphone_bubbly_240.jpg" />Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) is a company with $31 per share in cash on hand that just can't get a break. Analysts have begun downgrading the stock on fears that sales of Macs and iPhones will slow. As Apple hadn't been beaten down enough, shares dove today. <a href="http://www.piqqem.com/search?for=Apple">Sentiment on Apple</a> is rapidly deteriorating.<br /><br />Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.hedgefundresearch.com/">Hedge Fund Research</a>, a company that tracks hedge fund returns, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=atmPQBruhpsw">released its February stats for how the hedgies performed</a>. According to HFR, the hedgies beat the market soundly, losing only 0.5% in the month.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/doomsday-scenario-rotten-apple-hedge-fund-lies-bad-case-of-na/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Doomsday Scenario: Rotten Apple, hedge fund lies, bad case of natural gas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/doomsday-scenario-rotten-apple-hedge-fund-lies-bad-case-of-na/">Doomsday Scenario: Rotten Apple, hedge fund lies, bad case of natural gas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/doomsday-scenario-rotten-apple-hedge-fund-lies-bad-case-of-na/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1481270/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/doomsday-scenario-rotten-apple-hedge-fund-lies-bad-case-of-na/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>consumer</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>natural gas</category><category>statistics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: How will Target do in Q3?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/earnings-preview-how-will-target-do-in-q3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/earnings-preview-how-will-target-do-in-q3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/earnings-preview-how-will-target-do-in-q3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/target-logo-tgt.gif" />Do you like shopping at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">Target</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>)? Many people do. In fact, investors are hoping that so many people like buying things at the bullseye retailer that the company will beat earnings expectations for the third quarter. Target will be reporting on Monday, November 17. What should we expect?</p>
<p>Shareholders should expect a <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=TGT&amp;coid=65828&amp;client=cb">drop in the bottom line</a>. Now, did we need a source to tell us this? Probably not. The consumer is starting to feel scared, there's no doubt about it. I'm sure everyone has anecdotal evidence concerning the fear that is out there. Consumers are afraid that the job cuts being reported in the papers will eventually reach their cubicle, so they're scaling back on spending. So, if Target merely meets the expectation for $0.49 per share next Monday, I'm sure many shareholders will breathe a sigh of relief, even though that will represent about a 12% drop in per-share profit. <br /></p>
<p>I'm not so sure Target will beat, though. For one thing, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/target-tgt-drops-on-weak-october-sales/">Brent Archer</a> recently reported on Target's lousy October sales data. They missed Wall Street's mark. Since Target beat the last two quarters; I figure we're due for a miss considering everything that's been going on. We shall see. I'll be interested to see how the margins are doing and what kind of position the company may be in going into Black Friday. And I'll be looking at the comps, of course.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/earnings-preview-how-will-target-do-in-q3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: How will Target do in Q3?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/earnings-preview-how-will-target-do-in-q3/">Earnings preview: How will Target do in Q3?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=TGT&amp;coid=65828&amp;client=cb>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/earnings-preview-how-will-target-do-in-q3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1370608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/earnings-preview-how-will-target-do-in-q3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Black Friday</category><category>BlackFriday</category><category>consumer</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>featured</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>sears holdings</category><category>SearsHoldings</category><category>SHLD</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What's with Steve &amp; Barry's and why should we care?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/whats-with-steve-and-barrys-and-why-should-we-care/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/whats-with-steve-and-barrys-and-why-should-we-care/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/whats-with-steve-and-barrys-and-why-should-we-care/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/imb/" rel="tag">IndyMac Bancorp (IMB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/stevebarrys.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></em>As a sign of how disconnected one can be, I had to ask my 12-year old about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_&amp;_Barry's">Steve &amp; Barry's</a>. I had not heard of it and it is receiving way too many comments on our site to be ignored. My colleague <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/zac-bissonnette">Zac Bissonnette</a> started blogging about it a month ago <a title="View comment 13274947 on www.bloggingstocks.com" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/21/steve-and-barrys-on-the-brink-of-bankruptcy/#c13274947" target="_blank">Steve &amp; Barry's on the brink of bankruptcy?</a> and the comments are still coming in strong as the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Steve+and+Barrys/">story progressed</a>.<br /><br />Steve &amp; Barry's filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 9, 2008, and information about its status and answers to frequently asked questions can be found <a href="http://www.steveandbarrys.com/corpinfo.aspx">here</a>.<br /><br />The company has been expanding rapidly and clearly hit a brick wall with consumer budgets severely strained and the economy facing uncertainty in the short term. However, this is supposed to be a discount chain. Perhaps the discounting amounted to selling dollars for ninety cents, and it could not make it up on volume.<br /><br />This is a relatively small company, but clearly it matters to a lot of people. The number of comments we have received has surpassed most of our recent stories, even those of the Bear Stearns takeover (acquired by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan </a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">Chase </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>)) and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/indymac-bancorp-inc/idmc/nao">IndyMac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/indymac-bancorp-inc/idmc/nao">IDMC</a>) collapse.<br /><br />Steve &amp; Barry's might have had an IPO sometime in its future, but that is not likely in the current environment. What is it that makes this story so compelling to our readers? If it is because the stores are so great, what went wrong in your neighborhood? <br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. He writes the columns <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a>. </em><em>Disclosure: I own shares of any of JPM.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/whats-with-steve-and-barrys-and-why-should-we-care/">What's with Steve &amp; Barry's and why should we care?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/whats-with-steve-and-barrys-and-why-should-we-care/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1261741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/whats-with-steve-and-barrys-and-why-should-we-care/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BSC</category><category>Chapter 11</category><category>Chapter11</category><category>consumer</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>IMB</category><category>JPM</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Steve and Barrys</category><category>steve barrys</category><category>SteveAndBarrys</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pinching pennies at Penney's]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/pinching-pennies-at-penneys/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/pinching-pennies-at-penneys/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/pinching-pennies-at-penneys/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jcp/" rel="tag">Penney (J.C.) (JCP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rl/" rel="tag">Polo Ralph Lauren'A' (RL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/jcp-jc-penney-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120174918166530773.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us">Today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> has an article</a> about the cost-cutting measures going on retailer, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/j-c-penney-company-inc/jcp/nys">JC Penney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/j-c-penney-company-inc/jcp/nys">JCP</a>). The article, essentially an interview with CEO and Chairman, Myron "Mike" Ullman III, details Ullman's changing of gears, from aggressive store expansion and online growth to scaling back in the face of a looming recession.</p>
<p>The CEO is expected to announce today plans to merge the buying and marketing operations for store and online sales, cutting as many as 200 jobs.</p>
<p>In the article, Ullman says he may scale back store expansion over the next two years.</p>
<p><strong>Getting more of the consumer's wallet</strong></p>
<p>Ullman says, "Half of the families in the U.S. shopped with us at least once last year. But we only get 7% of their spending. So, our biggest opportunity in the downturn is to make every visit they make to our store, Internet or catalog more productive by offering more innovation."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/pinching-pennies-at-penneys/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pinching pennies at Penney's</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/pinching-pennies-at-penneys/">Pinching pennies at Penney's</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120174918166530773.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/pinching-pennies-at-penneys/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1102656/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/pinching-pennies-at-penneys/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jc penny</category><category>jcp</category><category>JcPenny</category><category>polo ralph lauren</category><category>PoloRalphLauren</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>rl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is it just about time to buy into the dollar?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/is-it-just-about-time-to-buy-into-the-dollar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/is-it-just-about-time-to-buy-into-the-dollar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/is-it-just-about-time-to-buy-into-the-dollar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img width="150" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" alt="dollar sign" />If you are of the mind that the American economy can't falter much worse than it already has, does that make a case for investing in the dollar right now? I would tend to think so. A <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/dollar-falls-to-seven-week-low-on-likely-lower-interest-rates-fr/">weak dollar</a> that has been mercilessly pinned against the floor for so long looks mighty appealing to me right now. The big questions are, how long shall this domestic economic sluggishness continue and what, if anything, are the growing industrial economies willing to do about it? If the undeniable rule of buy low and sell high applies to the dollar as with any other investment, someone is going to start scooping these greenbacks up in large chunks as their value bottoms out.<br /><br />The World Bank suggests that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/world-bank-says-oil-prices-to-fall-gradually-through-2009-to-75/">oil prices shall decline</a> to the middle 70's this year, giving a needed reprieve to currencies the world over. They also envision upwards of 3% <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/in-reversal-poorer-countries-not-u-s-seen-boosting-2008-glob/">economic growth globally</a> for 2008 and history shows that growing economies have always hungered for American consumer dollars. Couple these factors with the reality that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=write+down&amp;searchsubmit=search">phantom value</a> is finally being painfully peeled away from the American economic landscape and you have a recipe for a return to <em>real</em> economic growth here at home.<br /><br />I've pointed offshore for the past two quarters when discussing my perspective on safety in short term investment, yet one cannot deny that we're still fairly strong here at home. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/dollar-falls-to-new-low-against-euro/">Let no one claim that the dollar has met its doom.</a> I'm expecting some very heartening economic news as we go through Q2 '08, and I might suggest being poised to grasp a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/dollar/">dollar</a> that could rebound remarkably then.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/is-it-just-about-time-to-buy-into-the-dollar/">Is it just about time to buy into the dollar?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/dollar-falls-to-new-low-against-euro/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/is-it-just-about-time-to-buy-into-the-dollar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1086407/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/is-it-just-about-time-to-buy-into-the-dollar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>currencies</category><category>dollar</category><category>ECB</category><category>economy</category><category>euro</category><category>European-Central Bank</category><category>European-centralBank</category><category>exchange-rate</category><category>federal-reserve</category><category>franc</category><category>pound</category><category>recession</category><category>trade</category><category>World-Bank</category><category>yen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer credit numbers prove we're not scared yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bk/" rel="tag">Bank of New York (BK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img width="250" height="NaN" align="right" alt="credit help banner" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/badcredit.jpg" />Consumers are still willing to run their lives based on credit, so says an <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/credit-card-debt-spikes-in-november/20080108155209990001">Associated Press report</a>. Consumer borrowing increased at an annual rate of 7.4% in November compared to an increase of just 1% in October - ah yes, the faux magic of a consumerist Christmas.<br /><br />The truth of the matter rests in the cause for the rise. Is it because consumers are still confident in their <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/moms-rising-bringing-a-subtle-workplace-issue-up-front/">earning</a> potential? The more likely cause is that consumers are running out of funding options, read that -- they're running out of cash.<br /><br />So why is it that mortgages are getting harder to write but consumer purchases can still be funded with just a signature? Although they're deflating in value, homes still provide significant backing for lenders to lean their bets on whereas credit cards float in the unknown. With bankruptcies at an all time high, are we setting up for the final crash?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer credit numbers prove we're not scared yet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/">Consumer credit numbers prove we're not scared yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/credit-card-debt-spikes-in-november/20080108155209990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1082333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>banks</category><category>borrowing</category><category>consumer</category><category>credit</category><category>debt</category><category>dollar</category><category>earning</category><category>housing</category><category>lending</category><category>mortgage</category><category>real-estate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Wal-Mart really save families $2,500 each year?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/does-wal-mart-really-save-families-2-500-each-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/does-wal-mart-really-save-families-2-500-each-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/does-wal-mart-really-save-families-2-500-each-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img alt="Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) logo" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/wal-mart-wmt-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-in-com-usd0-10/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-in-com-usd0-10/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) instituted a new customer slogan this year: "Save Money. Live Better." Although it was intended to reinforce the retailer's position that it helps families in an age of increasing prices and general inflationary pressure, much of the public didn't get the memo, apparently.<br /><br />Keep in mind that it's hard to completely trust anything by either the retailer or its watchdog groups like Wal-Mart Watch, the latter released a survey that concluded only 4% of people believe that Wal-Mart saves the average American family $2,500 annually. The same report says that customers may indeed be paying less, but Wal-Mart is not the only company that can help them pad those wallets and fill those purses.<br /><br /><iframe align="left" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1422&amp;view=126253&amp;pollId=126353&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews2&amp;popup=yes" frameborder="0" width="205" height="200"></iframe>Of course, Wal-Mart Watch says that the study that backs Wal-Mart's "$2,500" claim credits just the retailer's existence with saving the customer that much. Perhaps that's through pricing competition in the area and inflation control more than Wal-Mart customers specifically saving that much by shopping at Wal-Mart? That could certainly be inferred here.<br /><br />Regardless, does the mere existence of <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=121932">Wal-Mart control the complete, surrounding retail ecosystem</a>, causing prices to remain ultra-competitive? Probably so -- and Wal-Mart's "Save Money. Live Better" might just be a statement of fact rather than a corporate pitch. Either way, there's probably some good truth in there.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/does-wal-mart-really-save-families-2-500-each-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does Wal-Mart really save families $2,500 each year?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/does-wal-mart-really-save-families-2-500-each-year/">Does Wal-Mart really save families $2,500 each year?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/article?article_id=121932>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/does-wal-mart-really-save-families-2-500-each-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1037485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/does-wal-mart-really-save-families-2-500-each-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Wal-Mart low prices</category><category>Wal-martLowPrices</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why isn't the economy being driven into a recession?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/why-isnt-the-economy-being-driven-into-a-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/why-isnt-the-economy-being-driven-into-a-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/why-isnt-the-economy-being-driven-into-a-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>Or, what I really wanted to title this post: Why isn't the collapse of the housing market and an inverted yield curve driving the economy into a recession?<br /><br />Last week's GDP growth of 4% was certainly a shocker. With the housing market suffering some serious weakness, the U.S. fixed income market trading like a complete mess and the yield curve being inverted (short-term rates higher than long-term rates) for more than a year, conventional wisdom would tell us that the US economy should be very close to a recession. However, GDP data is telling us quite the opposite.<br /><br />With roughly 70% of the U.S. GDP derived from the consumer, the withdrawal of credit from the primary and secondary mortgage markets led many pundits to conclude the consumer is tapped out and therefore the U.S. economy is in for some serious trouble.<br /><br />However, these proclamations of consumer collapse have failed to materialize. Why is that? The answer is a tight labor market, with wage increases more than offsetting weakness in the mortgage market. Three cheers for labor.<br /><br />After twenty-five years of open markets, U.S. labor is now very competitive as lower-skilled jobs have moved offshore and jobs requiring higher-end skills have boomed. Most of the leading job creators, NASDAQ companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco Systems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>), were either just getting started or did not exist when this job growth boom began. Now there are hundreds, if not thousands, of companies that are seeking higher skilled employees.<br /><br />At the end of the day, last week's GDP data demonstrates that good times are ahead for U.S. labor. After going through a brutal transition from a manufacturing to a service economy, labor appears it has the upper hand once again. The terribly weak mortgage market will be more than offset by the positive effects of a tight market for labor.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/why-isnt-the-economy-being-driven-into-a-recession/">Why isn't the economy being driven into a recession?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/why-isnt-the-economy-being-driven-into-a-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/980995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/why-isnt-the-economy-being-driven-into-a-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>economy</category><category>gdp</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>mortgage</category><category>recession</category><category>yield curve</category><category>YieldCurve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow sheds another 280 points -- What should you do now?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/dow-sheds-another-250-points-whats-should-you-do-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/dow-sheds-another-250-points-whats-should-you-do-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/dow-sheds-another-250-points-whats-should-you-do-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/mutualfund200_mf030206.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Most of the day, the Dow Jones industrial average was in a steady, but slow decline -- the kind of drop where traders figure it's going to be a negative day, but nothing to worry too much about. </p>
<p>But after the much-anticipated minutes of the Federal Reserve Board's Aug. 7 meeting went public around 2 P.M. and investors didn't see the signs they were hoping for that the central bank would be willing to cut interest rates, the selling picked up. The Dow closed down about 250 points. That's less than 2% -- hardly the stuff of panic -- but more indication that a lot of professional investors are counting on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates, and do it soon. </p>
<p>A decline in consumer confidence reported earlier in the day didn't help. It's becoming increasingly clear that the real danger with the meltdown in the sub-prime mortgage market is not with the financial sector. Sure, hedge funds will shut down, big banks' earnings will suffer. But the really big worry now is that the U.S. consumer could roll over. </p>
<p>That's the view of Robert Loest, senior portfolio manager of Integrity Mutual Funds, who visited AOL's offices today. The housing market is not going to rebound quickly or easily -- especially with so many adjustable rate mortgages still due to reset to higher rates in 2008, he warns. And he suggests investors avoid all consumer plays; not just the luxury goods stocks, but even discounters, like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>). </p>
<p>Loest further recommends picking up some counter-cyclical stocks -- like bankruptcy software maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/epiq-systems-inc/epiq/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Epiq Systems</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/epiq-systems-inc/epiq/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">EPIQ</a>) or collection agency <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/portfolio-recovery-associates-inc/praa/nas">Portfolio Recovery Associates</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/portfolio-recovery-associates-inc/praa/nas">PRAA</a>), both of which he owns. "Those are the kind of stocks that should do well when the economy does poorly and could make a real difference to your portfolio," he says. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/dow-sheds-another-250-points-whats-should-you-do-now/">Dow sheds another 280 points -- What should you do now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/dow-sheds-another-250-points-whats-should-you-do-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/975947/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/dow-sheds-another-250-points-whats-should-you-do-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>Epiq</category><category>featured</category><category>Integrity Mutual Funds</category><category>IntegrityMutualFunds</category><category>Loest</category><category>PRAA</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:13:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
