<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Four of five portals will die, says Hindery: death to Google?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/four-of-five-portals-will-die-says-hindery-death-to-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/four-of-five-portals-will-die-says-hindery-death-to-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/four-of-five-portals-will-die-says-hindery-death-to-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insider-blogging/" rel="tag">Insider Blogging</a></p><p>Is it more inflammatory in a headline to say, "death to Google" than "death to AOL" or "death to Yahoo!"? That seems to be what <a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2006/06/26/the_death_of_go.html">everyone's going with</a>, today.</p>
<p>Because today is the day that everyone's <a href="http://techconfidential.thedealblogs.com/2006/06/leo_hinderys_death_sentence_fo.php">reviewing the keynote speech of longtime cable exec Leo Hindery</a>, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/convergence/speakers.htm">at the Convergence 2.0 conference yesterday</a>. Hindery (representing the "Washington Insider" viewpoint but, seemingly, attacking his subject matter in an Infrastructure-is-King Insider kind of way) represented the media universe as consisting of three pillars: </p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>Content (ABC, NBC, Disney, Time Warner's content side?), </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Portals (Google, Yahoo!, AOL, MSN, and eBay) and </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>"Non-Broadcast Distributors" (notably, cable and the satellites)</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>He put numbers to everything, so I can make fun of it more easily. Portals have a collective market cap of $225 billion, he says. Advertising represents two-thirds of this, or about $150 billion. But as the content that makes up the backbone of these portals is non-proprietary, it will be easy for the content providers to steal that money away.</p>
<p>Hence, death to Google. And three of the other four (I haven't found where he said which of the content providers would survive).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/four-of-five-portals-will-die-says-hindery-death-to-google/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Four of five portals will die, says Hindery: death to Google?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/four-of-five-portals-will-die-says-hindery-death-to-google/">Four of five portals will die, says Hindery: death to Google?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://techconfidential.thedealblogs.com/2006/06/leo_hinderys_death_sentence_fo.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/four-of-five-portals-will-die-says-hindery-death-to-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/637411/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/four-of-five-portals-will-die-says-hindery-death-to-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.0</category><category>convergence</category><category>convergence 2.0</category><category>Convergence2.0</category><category>death</category><category>die</category><category>leo hindery</category><category>LeoHindery</category><category>portal</category><category>portals</category><category>portals die</category><category>PortalsDie</category><category>portland</category><category>web 2.0</category><category>web convergence</category><category>Web2.0</category><category>WebConvergence</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:53:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
