<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: Xerox Corporation can't reproduce its early momentum]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-xerox-corporation-cant-reproduce-its/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-xerox-corporation-cant-reproduce-its/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-xerox-corporation-cant-reproduce-its/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xrx/" rel="tag">Xerox Corp (XRX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-xerox-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade?icid=100214839x1206443214x1200311100">this series</a>, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.</em></p>
<p>Google should allow the sad fate of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xerox-corporation/xrx/nys">Xerox Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xerox-corporation/xrx/nys">XRX</a>) to serve as a cautionary tale: the use of your company's name as a common verb in the popular lexicon does not guarantee long-term success. <br /></p>
<p>I can remember an age when I thought "xerox" was a legitimate action verb. But I couldn't tell you the last time I made a "xerox." You may remember from <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/25/worst-10-year-performers-gannett-co-s-performance-not-fit-to/">our discussion</a> of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) that people don't read the paper anymore. Well, it's actually a little more serious than that -- people don't even like to use paper anymore.</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At number 18 on our list of SPX laggards, XRX shed 73% of its value during the 10 years that ended June 30, 2008. The stock tapped a high of $63.94 back in May 1999, shortly after G. Richard Thoman succeeded Paul Allaire as CEO. As <em>The New York Times</em> noted, Thoman was taking the helm "...at a time of unprecedented change for Xerox," with digital technology transforming traditional copier and printer usage.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-xerox-corporation-cant-reproduce-its/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: Xerox Corporation can't reproduce its early momentum</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-xerox-corporation-cant-reproduce-its/">Worst 10-year performers: Xerox Corporation can't reproduce its early momentum</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-xerox-corporation-cant-reproduce-its/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262815/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-xerox-corporation-cant-reproduce-its/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>copiers</category><category>earnings</category><category>Xerox</category><category>XRX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
