<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[This U.S. administration may have a strong dollar policy . . . and actually mean it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/this-u-s-administration-may-have-a-strong-dollar-policy-and-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/this-u-s-administration-may-have-a-strong-dollar-policy-and-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/this-u-s-administration-may-have-a-strong-dollar-policy-and-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dollar-bill.jpg" alt="" />The previous U.S. presidential administration preached a great deal about a 'strong dollar policy.' <br /><br />Unfortunately, almost no actions practiced by the administration supported that goal. <br /><br />Concerning the federal budget, a decade of deficits has really hurt the dollar's value. A $1.3 trillion tax cut in 2001 ended the balance budget era of the late 1990s, and subsequent increases in defense spending for the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars -- combined with a lack of a tax increase to pay for that additional spending -- soon led to +$200 billion budget deficits. After swelling to $300 billion, the bank bailout and related legislation would push the deficit <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9978/2-2009-MBR.pdf">over $500 billion,</a> according to the Congressional Budget Office, and it's projected to top $1 trillion this year and in fiscal 2010.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/this-u-s-administration-may-have-a-strong-dollar-policy-and-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>This U.S. administration may have a strong dollar policy . . . and actually mean it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/this-u-s-administration-may-have-a-strong-dollar-policy-and-a/">This U.S. administration may have a strong dollar policy . . . and actually mean it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/this-u-s-administration-may-have-a-strong-dollar-policy-and-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454765/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/this-u-s-administration-may-have-a-strong-dollar-policy-and-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>British pound</category><category>budget deficit</category><category>corporate tax rate</category><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>trade deficit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush-Rangel compromise possible on hedge fund/AMT bill]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><strong>Beltway Banter: </strong>The quick, initial read regarding <a href="http://www.house.gov/rangel/">U.S. Representative Charles Rangel's (D-New York)</a> hedge fund/buy-out firm tax bill introduced Thursday is that the measure, as composed, would produce a certain veto from President Bush, but that the Bush Administration may be willing to work on a revised Rangel measure. <br /><br />A revised bill, provided it successfully snakes its way through the U.S. Senate, may be legislation President Bush can work with, as a way to solve the alternate minimum tax issue. Designed to prevent wealthy Americans from paying no tax via tax shelters, the AMT -- due to inflation -- applies to a larger number of upper-middle-income Americans each year. Without an AMT patch, 21 million households will be obligated to pay the alternate minimum tax.<br /><br />U.S. Rep. Rangel's measure would more than double the tax rate on carried interest, the executive compensation at buy-out and venture-capital firms, and would require hedge-fund managers to pay tax on income they defer in offshore accounts, among other bill features.<br /><br />U.S. Rep. Rangel calls his bill "the mother of all tax reforms." Republican leaders disagree. In a statement, they called the bill, "the mother of all tax hikes" and assert that <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews&amp;storyID=2007-10-25T175647Z_01_N25634174_RTRIDST_0_USA-TAXES-UPDATE-1.XML">the bill would raise taxes by $1 trillion</a> over a 10-year span, Reuters reported. Rep. Rangel countered by saying that U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson had recommended the business tax changes.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush-Rangel compromise possible on hedge fund/AMT bill</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/">Bush-Rangel compromise possible on hedge fund/AMT bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022148/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aternative minimum tax</category><category>Bush</category><category>corporate tax rate</category><category>corporations</category><category>global economy</category><category>income tax</category><category>Paulson</category><category>Rangel</category><category>tax rates</category><category>tax reform</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
