<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Entrepreneur's Journal: Is It Time to Incorporate?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/09/entrepreneurs-journal-incorporation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/09/entrepreneurs-journal-incorporation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/09/entrepreneurs-journal-incorporation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/legalzoom-logo.jpg" alt="" />Of the millions of business across America, only a small percentage are incorporated. Perhaps one of the biggest reasons is the cost. For example, in California there is a whopping $800 franchise tax fee. Yes, in today's tough economic environment, this is certainly a big deal.</p>
<p>Another problem is the paperwork, which can distract from your business.</p>
<p>But if you want to operate a sustainable business, you should really think seriously about incorporating. The benefits often outweigh the costs. Let's take a look:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/09/entrepreneurs-journal-incorporation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entrepreneur's Journal: Is It Time to Incorporate?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/09/entrepreneurs-journal-incorporation/">Entrepreneur's Journal: Is It Time to Incorporate?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 09 May 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/09/entrepreneurs-journal-incorporation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19467226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/09/entrepreneurs-journal-incorporation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>corporations</category><category>featured</category><category>Incorporation</category><category>LLC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's been a decade filled with CEOs with eyes wide shut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/its-been-a-decade-filled-with-ceos-with-eyes-wide-shut/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/its-been-a-decade-filled-with-ceos-with-eyes-wide-shut/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/its-been-a-decade-filled-with-ceos-with-eyes-wide-shut/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p>In the rush to and sheer scope of stabilizing first the financial system, and then key institutions in the financial system, and now jump-starting the U.S. economy, is the United States in danger of not correcting one other possible operational flaw?</p>
<p>One wise and successful CEO told yours truly that the nation might very well be doing just that. Full disclosure: the CEO is a friend of mine.</p>
<p><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">It starts at the top</span></p>
<p>The source problem: <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">CEOs,</span> the CEO said. In less than a decade, for reasons which are probably complex, the United States has produced a stunning array of CEOs whose actions have been, at minimum, selfish and unethical, and even fraudulent and illegal.</p>
<p>Now, in the context of a post-September 11 geopolitical world, the senior management flaws would appear to be minor. But from an American standpoint, certainly from a Protestant work ethic standpoint -- the genesis of the American system -- the errors/lapses have been gargantuan.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/its-been-a-decade-filled-with-ceos-with-eyes-wide-shut/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's been a decade filled with CEOs with eyes wide shut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/its-been-a-decade-filled-with-ceos-with-eyes-wide-shut/">It's been a decade filled with CEOs with eyes wide shut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/its-been-a-decade-filled-with-ceos-with-eyes-wide-shut/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1425555/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/its-been-a-decade-filled-with-ceos-with-eyes-wide-shut/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CEOs</category><category>corporations</category><category>decision making</category><category>ethics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who or what caused this financial crisis? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/who-or-what-caused-this-financial-crisis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/who-or-what-caused-this-financial-crisis/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/who-or-what-caused-this-financial-crisis/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><a title="Question Mark by purpleslog" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/purpleslog/1106852126/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/worriedbroker_260mw_mf01270.jpg" /></a>Investors and readers are no doubt aware of the benefits of the free enterprise system as practiced in the United States: entrepreneurship, innovation, ingenuity, dynamism, risk taking, wealth building, and commerce are chief among these benefits.<br /><br />But readers also know that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_capitalism">corporate capitalism</a> has its drawbacks, including (but not exclusively) financial crises that have resulted in devastating economic and social upheavals.<br /><strong><br />1893, 1929, 1987, 20??<br /></strong><br />Moreover, despite technological change, productivity increases, and massive increases in wealth, it's remarkable how similar both the crises and the public policy responses have been over the hundred-plus year period: excesses occur, bad debts mount, some regulatory changes are implemented by the U.S. Government (and sometimes by state governments), and then corporate capitalism resumes. <br /><br />Further, whether it's due to America's culture, its vast natural resources, something innate in Americans, human nature in general, or some other factor, or a combination, every time a crisis occurs, the American people, by and large, reach the same conclusion regarding what caused the crisis or problem: bad decisions or incorrect decisions. Basically, that people, mainly executives and other business leaders (sometimes federal/state regulators), made mistakes or bad decisions.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/who-or-what-caused-this-financial-crisis/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Who or what caused this financial crisis? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/who-or-what-caused-this-financial-crisis/">Who or what caused this financial crisis? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/who-or-what-caused-this-financial-crisis/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1318013/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/who-or-what-caused-this-financial-crisis/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>bond market</category><category>corporate capitalism</category><category>corporations</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>credit markets</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>free market</category><category>stock market</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Government</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[High energy cost era suggests major changes ahead for the United States]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/high-energy-cost-era-suggests-major-changes-ahead-for-the-united/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/high-energy-cost-era-suggests-major-changes-ahead-for-the-united/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/high-energy-cost-era-suggests-major-changes-ahead-for-the-united/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>That the arrival of <a href="http://www.newyorkgasprices.com/retail_price_chart.aspx">$4 per gallon gasoline</a> has already propelled changes in consumer and corporate behavior would not be a revelation to most investors / readers. <br /><br />Still, a prudent tack for investors -- or heads of households/husbands/wives, for that matter -- is to look beyond the short-term conditions and try to gauge longer-term trends -- trends that may uncover investment opportunities. <br />Short-term, oil is likely to correct, many economists agree. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> at one-hundred-twenty-five bucks per barrel is well above what many economists and analysts believe is a price capable of sustaining adequate U.S. and global economic growth. Speculators have pushed oil higher than what it should sell for based on fundamentals, and a pull-back is likely in the quarters ahead. That will take some pressure off gasoline, diesel and heating oil prices. <br /><br />But what about long-term? Short-term, gasoline prices should moderate, but is $4 gasoline a high point? Probably not, if current global oil consumption trends continue. What's more likely? Additional, steady rises in gasoline, diesel and heating oil prices in the years ahead, particularly if the U.S. economy shows signs of a recovery later in 2008.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/high-energy-cost-era-suggests-major-changes-ahead-for-the-united/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>High energy cost era suggests major changes ahead for the United States</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/high-energy-cost-era-suggests-major-changes-ahead-for-the-united/">High energy cost era suggests major changes ahead for the United States</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/high-energy-cost-era-suggests-major-changes-ahead-for-the-united/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1214513/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/high-energy-cost-era-suggests-major-changes-ahead-for-the-united/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>commuting</category><category>corporations</category><category>employers</category><category>energy crisis</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing</category><category>leisure</category><category>mass transit</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>quality of life</category><category>standard of living</category><category>staycation</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>work</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[At downturn's start, hiring freezes, not layoffs, prevail]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/at-downturns-start-hiring-freezes-not-layoffs-prevail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/at-downturns-start-hiring-freezes-not-layoffs-prevail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/at-downturns-start-hiring-freezes-not-layoffs-prevail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>There's an economic adage that says, "The economic cycle repeats itself, but never in quite the same way." <br /><br />The current economic slowdown, at least initially, is providing evidence to confirm the above, as unlike the previous two slowdowns, corporations appear to be taking a more-cautious approach toward both eliminating and adding jobs.<br /><br />During this cyclical downturn, many companies are adopting hiring freezes as they attempt to discern the likely direction for the U.S. economy in 2008 and beyond, <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>reported<em>.</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120113814362011983.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">(Subscription required.)</a> Many economists expect the U.S. economy to register anemic growth in Q1 and Q2 2008 -- roughly 1.0-1.5% GDP growth, and the most recent monthly hiring total supports that prediction: the nation added fewer than 20,000 jobs in December 2007. <br /><br />However, unlike the start of previous downturns in 2001,1990-1991, and 1981-1982, corporations have resisted -- at least so far -- major layoffs and operational cutbacks. Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks on Thursday that he believes two factors are behind the personnel balancing act. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/at-downturns-start-hiring-freezes-not-layoffs-prevail/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>At downturn's start, hiring freezes, not layoffs, prevail</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/at-downturns-start-hiring-freezes-not-layoffs-prevail/">At downturn's start, hiring freezes, not layoffs, prevail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/at-downturns-start-hiring-freezes-not-layoffs-prevail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1095853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/at-downturns-start-hiring-freezes-not-layoffs-prevail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>corporations</category><category>employees</category><category>GDP</category><category>job creation</category><category>jobs</category><category>productivity</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush-Rangel compromise possible on hedge fund/AMT bill]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><strong>Beltway Banter: </strong>The quick, initial read regarding <a href="http://www.house.gov/rangel/">U.S. Representative Charles Rangel's (D-New York)</a> hedge fund/buy-out firm tax bill introduced Thursday is that the measure, as composed, would produce a certain veto from President Bush, but that the Bush Administration may be willing to work on a revised Rangel measure. <br /><br />A revised bill, provided it successfully snakes its way through the U.S. Senate, may be legislation President Bush can work with, as a way to solve the alternate minimum tax issue. Designed to prevent wealthy Americans from paying no tax via tax shelters, the AMT -- due to inflation -- applies to a larger number of upper-middle-income Americans each year. Without an AMT patch, 21 million households will be obligated to pay the alternate minimum tax.<br /><br />U.S. Rep. Rangel's measure would more than double the tax rate on carried interest, the executive compensation at buy-out and venture-capital firms, and would require hedge-fund managers to pay tax on income they defer in offshore accounts, among other bill features.<br /><br />U.S. Rep. Rangel calls his bill "the mother of all tax reforms." Republican leaders disagree. In a statement, they called the bill, "the mother of all tax hikes" and assert that <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews&amp;storyID=2007-10-25T175647Z_01_N25634174_RTRIDST_0_USA-TAXES-UPDATE-1.XML">the bill would raise taxes by $1 trillion</a> over a 10-year span, Reuters reported. Rep. Rangel countered by saying that U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson had recommended the business tax changes.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush-Rangel compromise possible on hedge fund/AMT bill</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/">Bush-Rangel compromise possible on hedge fund/AMT bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022148/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/bush-rangel-compromise-possible-on-hedge-fund-amt-bill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aternative minimum tax</category><category>Bush</category><category>corporate tax rate</category><category>corporations</category><category>global economy</category><category>income tax</category><category>Paulson</category><category>Rangel</category><category>tax rates</category><category>tax reform</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
