<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[New report: click fraud worsening?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/new-report-click-fraud-worsening/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/new-report-click-fraud-worsening/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/new-report-click-fraud-worsening/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/google-fends-off-lawsuit-over-page-rank-feature/">lawsuit by Kinderstart against Google</a>, while an&nbsp;interesting issue,&nbsp;is small potatoes compared to what many consider to be the real elephant in the room: click fraud.&nbsp; Both Yahoo and Google have already run into legal trouble -- resulting in relatively small monetary settlements -- regarding such allegations.&nbsp; Today <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/05/BUGL6JOQPA1.DTL&amp;feed=rss.business">the San Francisco Chronicle discusses a new report</a> by Burlingame market researcher Outsell Inc. suggesting that click fraud cost merchants $800 million last year and is a signficant enough threat that 27% of merchants are cutting back on&nbsp;click-based advertising.</p>
<p>Coincidentally, over on ZDnet, Digital Micro-markets blogger Donna Bogatin has recently been discussing both <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/?p=188">Microsoft's</a> and <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/?p=183">Yahoo's</a> assessments of and attempts to thwart click fraud, concluding that <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/?p=196">click fraud prevention could be the next great search engine differentiator</a>.&nbsp; She also suggests that Google has lagged behind its competitors in facing this issue publically.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Now this is hardly a new problem. It has been around long enough to have spawned a whole set of start-ups aimed at prevention.&nbsp; But the fact that it won't go away -- and if the&nbsp;Outsell report is accurate, may actually be getting worse, at least from the merchants' perspective (and who else counts?) -- may suggest that cost-per-click needs an upgrade.&nbsp; The next step, of course, is the cost-per-action model that some analysts and customers are pressing for.&nbsp; Some sites already offer this and <a href="http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/12363">Google is reportedly experimenting with it as well</a>.&nbsp; </p>
<p>But CPA is a very slippery slope.&nbsp; The issue goes back to why online publishers traditionally resist cost-per-click pricing for display advertising: your revenue becomes dependent on the advertiser's creative.&nbsp; A good ad is going to get more clicks than a poorly executed one.&nbsp; CPA action takes that dependency a step further: the search engine's revenue depends on both a well-designed pitch after the click plus an enticing offer.&nbsp;&nbsp;If the advertiser fails on either of those points, you're not going to get paid and your inventory isn't generating revenue.</p>
<p>If I ran a search engine, I'd be spending a lot of time and energy trying to maintain the credibility of my cost-per-click business. If the market really does turn to cost-per-action, we may end up looking back on these as the Golden Days of search engine advertising, when the money just fell from the sky.&nbsp; </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/new-report-click-fraud-worsening/">New report: click fraud worsening?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/05/BUGL6JOQPA1.DTL&amp;feed=rss.business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/new-report-click-fraud-worsening/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/639717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/new-report-click-fraud-worsening/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>click fraud</category><category>ClickFraud</category><category>cost per action</category><category>cost per click</category><category>CostPerAction</category><category>CostPerClick</category><category>CPA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rogers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
