creative posts

Feed

Apple after the bell 6/14/06: down a bit as Creative challenges Apple's patents

Apple finished today at $57.61, down 72 cents. The negative news for Apple today was that the other MP3 device company Creative has gotten the International Trade Commission to launch an investigation into whether the iPod infringes on Creative's patents for the Zen player. Creative's stock rose some 5% today as news came out.

Creative is trying to overthrow Apple, but Apple is pretty firmly cemented in the #1 position for digital music players. As a result Creative and Apple have been circling each other like a pair of territorial yard dogs, with both companies filing patent complaints against each other over the last year.

[Disclosure: I own Apple stock at the date of this post]

Google's 20% rule: why not make it 50%?

I'm up late watching Charlie Rose's taped interview with Google CEO Eric Schmidt. In raving about Google's 20% rule -- that engineers can spend 20% of their time on projects of their own choosing -- Schmidt says that all of their new products come from that 20% "free time." Charlie asks an obvious question, one that's been bugging me for months: "why not make it 50%?"

Schmidt doesn't answer the question, really (he is a CEO after all), basically saying that, although it's a great idea, and they should do it, anarchy would prevail.

Why would anarchy prevail if 50% of a creative worker's time was spent doing creative, independently-chosen work? I think it's a fantastic idea and one that many companies should employ. If workers are selected for their extreme intelligence and ability to innovate, why not have them create the products they wish existed? We'd all be better for it.

iPod joining Kleenex, Xerox as 'generic' names to describe category?

is this creative zen mp3 player synonymous
with apple's ipod?Xerox ® and Kleenex ® have been fighting for decades to protect their intellectual property. Their assertion, that their trademarked names are not nouns (it's a Xerox ® copy, and a Kleenex ® tissue), has been maintained despite every common usage evidence to the contrary, whereas words like Band-Aid and Aspirin have faded into 'generic' status, losing their trademarks.

iPod, surely, is headed that direction. When my sister asked for an iPod for Christmas, I immediately thought, but does she want an iPod ® player? Or an iPod? Apple may have some serious work to do to protect its IP, what with the ubiquity of white-colored iFakes from makers like Creative and SanDisk. This article from TechNewsWorld wonders if "MP3 player and iPod may become synonymous." I'd argue that it's already happened. Even iPod's silhouette ad style is being ripped off from here to my friend's Christmas cards.

What do you think? Are iPod and MP3 player synonymous? And should Apple spend big to protect their trademark from generocide?

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+72.8112,874.04
NASDAQ+27.512,931.39
S&P 500+9.131,351.77

Last updated: February 13, 2012: 06:24 PM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

19.07+0.195(+1.03)

Alcoa

10.33+0.04(+0.39)

Apple Inc

502.60+9.18(+1.86)

Google Inc 'A'

612.20+6.29(+1.04)

Bank of America

8.25+0.18(+2.23)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.79-0.11(-0.18)

Exxon Mobil Corp

84.42+0.62(+0.74)

Ford

12.54+0.10(+0.80)

Citigroup

32.88-0.045(-0.14)

IBM

192.62+0.20(+0.10)

Yahoo

16.12-0.02(-0.12)

Starbucks

49.25+0.43(+0.88)

Microsoft

30.58+0.085(+0.28)

Home Depot

45.93+0.60(+1.32)

DailyFinance Headlines

AOL Business News

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Sponsored Links

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

Page Loaded in 1329175443642 ms.