<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[A FormFactor play is possible, but it's not for the squeamish]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/a-formfactor-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/a-formfactor-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/a-formfactor-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>I'm issuing a Buy recommendation for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/formfactor-inc/form/nas">FormFactor, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/formfactor-inc/form/nas">FORM</a>), but with a tight stop. Here's why: <br /><br />FORM's revenue for FY2009 will probably decline another 30-40%, following a 55% revenue plunge in FY2008, but institutional investors are looking past current conditions, to likely corporate increases in tech spending in FY2010, driven by the transition to DDR3 technology in the memory segment.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/a-formfactor-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A FormFactor play is possible, but it's not for the squeamish</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/a-formfactor-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/">A FormFactor play is possible, but it's not for the squeamish</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/a-formfactor-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19088166/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/a-formfactor-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ddr3ram</category><category>FORM</category><category>FormFactor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
