<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Bank Failures Hit 42, Expected to Exceed 2009's 140]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/bank.jpg"  alt="" />Friday marked the failure of another <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bank/">bank</a>, pushing the 2010 total to 42. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation took over <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-04-09-bank-failures_N.htm" target="_blank">Beach First National Bank in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina</a>. <br />
<br />
The bank had $585.1 million in assets and $516 in deposits. Bank of North Carolina, based in Thomasville, is taking over the failed bank's assets and deposits. The Beach First failure is expected to cost the FDIC $130.3 million. <br />
<br />
A growing number of loan defaults, especially in the commercial real estate sector, have put considerable pressure on banks across the country. In fact, failures are expected to peak this year, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/three-more-banks-fail/" target="_blank">exceeding the 140 that occurred in 2009</a>, which was the worst year since 1992.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank Failures Hit 42, Expected to Exceed 2009's 140</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/">Bank Failures Hit 42, Expected to Exceed 2009's 140</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2010-04-09-bank-failures_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19434809/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/bank-failures-hit-42-expected-to-exceed-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank failure</category><category>bank failures</category><category>banking</category><category>banks</category><category>Beach First National Bank</category><category>commercial real estate</category><category>defaults</category><category>FDIC</category><category>Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>mortgages</category><category>real estate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress may have to approve a 'TARP 2,' economist says]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>With credit markets remaining under stress, and with uncertainty growing regarding the status of megabank <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>), the U.S. Congress may have to take more action to maintain financial system stability and prevent the U.S. economy from spiraling into a deeper recession, so says economist David H. Wang. <br /><br />"The U.S. Congress may have to approve a 'TARP 2,'" Wang told BloggingStocks Friday. "Whether Congress does it as part of a fiscal stimulus package, or separately, it is clear we will need more money to purchase toxic assets, improve bank capitalization and allocate funds for home mortgage refinance programs, and other financial stabilization measures. At this stage of the crisis, the $700 billion TARP is not going to be enough, in my interpretation."<br /><br /><strong>Bank sector stress remains</strong><br /><br />Wang said that if Citigroup, whose CEO Vikram Pandit said <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i1ZrQfzb7hmZ7eYis62LLRslMjHQD94JDTOG2">has adequate capital</a>, for some reason cannot, when needed, find additional capital in the private sector, then "the Fed and or U.S. Treasury will step in, and take necessary measures to stabilize the bank," Wang said. If the U.S. Treasury is the primary funder, "that action, and other forthcoming, planned actions by the Treasury may use up a considerable amount of TARP funds, requiring a TARP 2."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress may have to approve a 'TARP 2,' economist says</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/">Congress may have to approve a 'TARP 2,' economist says</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379622/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>commercial mortgage backed securities</category><category>Congress</category><category>defaults</category><category>Fed</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>TARP</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will spiking credit card defaults make things even worse?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/will-spiking-credit-card-defaults-make-things-even-worse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/will-spiking-credit-card-defaults-make-things-even-worse/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/will-spiking-credit-card-defaults-make-things-even-worse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/barclay-bcs-credit-card.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />In the last few years it's become pretty clear that there are many mortgages which people can't repay. But that's not the only place where people are having problems making ends meet. Borrowers holding loans for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/commercial-mortgages-next-to-collapse/">commercial real estate</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/4-3-billion-leaving-leveraged-loans-as-credit-contagion-spreads/">leveraged buyouts</a>, and <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/03/07/entering_the_repossession_lane/">automobiles</a> are also having their problems with repayment.</p>
<p>So it should not be a huge surprise to learn that people who hold credit cards are not repaying the money they borrowed in a timely fashion. <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/bad-credit-card-debt-could-next/story.aspx?guid=%7BDE0C0B15%2D4760%2D491C%2DA0F4%2DD34CBD96F7B7%7D">Innovest StrategicValue Advisors</a>, a consulting firm, forecasts that banks will charge off $18.6 billion worth of credit card receivables in the first quarter of 2009 and $96 billion in 2009 -- that would be 261% more than in 2007 and 131% higher than the level it expects by the end of 2008.</p>
<p>But will a rise in defaults be devastating to credit card companies? A typical installment loan is a relatively low $2,200, so if a borrower pays late, the credit card companies can charge very high fees and raise the interest rates so high that they can offset some of the losses they'll incur when they ultimately end up charging off the receivable. But this credit crunch has proven that historical patterns don't always apply.</p>
<p>It would not surprise me if a rapid rise in credit card defaults had a negative impact that most experts had not anticipated.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#888888">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the letter="" cohan=""></the></em></a><em>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/will-spiking-credit-card-defaults-make-things-even-worse/">Will spiking credit card defaults make things even worse?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/will-spiking-credit-card-defaults-make-things-even-worse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1330007/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/will-spiking-credit-card-defaults-make-things-even-worse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>credit cards</category><category>CreditCards</category><category>defaults</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fannie, Freddie bailout -- first step toward ending housing sector's slide]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/fannie-freddie-bailout-first-step-toward-ending-housing-sect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/fannie-freddie-bailout-first-step-toward-ending-housing-sect/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/fannie-freddie-bailout-first-step-toward-ending-housing-sect/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>As Washington legislation goes, the housing bailout bill that the U.S. House and Senate passed last week and that President Bush is expected to sign this week, is omnibus in scope and, ultimately, in budget and economic impact.<br /><br />Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks Monday the bill's two key components are the assistance to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Freddie Mac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>), and a new Federal Housing Administration program. The former, Langan says, "represents an implied guarantee" of Fannie and Freddie by the U.S. Government, which should restore confidence in each, and in the secondary mortgage market. Banks and other mortgage lenders, he said, "will now be more willing to write conforming loans, knowing that Fannie and Freddie will have the funds available to purchase and back these loans."<br /><br />The latter, a Federal Housing Administration program that enables banks to sell to the U.S. Government mortgages unlikely to be repaid, "will help stem the tide of foreclosures that's plaguing the housing sector," as well as "relieve banks/lenders of less-than-stellar to non-performing assets," Langan said. <br /><br /><strong>Beginning of the end of the housing slump?<br /></strong><br />Some House and Senate Republicans, and a few Democrats, among others, have chaffed at the bailout bill's cost and ultimate impact on the U.S. taxpayer. House Republican leader U.S. Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ahk84KN9CNyI&amp;refer=home">told Bloomberg News</a> the bill did not reform Fannie and Freddie enough, and will leave taxpayers with a bill for "billions and billions of dollars." Langan said Rep. Boehner's concern is legitimate.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/fannie-freddie-bailout-first-step-toward-ending-housing-sect/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fannie, Freddie bailout -- first step toward ending housing sector's slide</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/fannie-freddie-bailout-first-step-toward-ending-housing-sect/">Fannie, Freddie bailout -- first step toward ending housing sector's slide</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/fannie-freddie-bailout-first-step-toward-ending-housing-sect/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1268656/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/fannie-freddie-bailout-first-step-toward-ending-housing-sect/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>bond market</category><category>defaults</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>federal budget</category><category>Federal Housing Administration</category><category>FNM</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>gdp</category><category>housing sector</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>median home prices</category><category>mortgage lenders</category><category>mortgages</category><category>taxes</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dollar rises to one-month high on Fannie, Freddie rescue bill's progress]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/dollar-rises-to-one-month-high-on-fannie-freddie-rescue-bills/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/dollar-rises-to-one-month-high-on-fannie-freddie-rescue-bills/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/dollar-rises-to-one-month-high-on-fannie-freddie-rescue-bills/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The dollar rose to a one-month high Thursday morning, as dollar bulls cheered a report that U.S. Congressional legislation designed to shore-up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had passed the House and that the Senate will begin evaluating the measure. <br /><br />The House voted 272-152 in favor of the measure, and the Senate is expected to pass the bill within days, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/23/AR2008072300317.html?hpid=topnews">The Washington Post reported Thursday.</a> President Bush, reversing earlier opposition to a component of the bill that would help communities hit hard by foreclosures, said he will sign the legislation in its current form. <br /> <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/dollar-rises-to-one-month-high-on-fannie-freddie-rescue-bills/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dollar rises to one-month high on Fannie, Freddie rescue bill's progress</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/dollar-rises-to-one-month-high-on-fannie-freddie-rescue-bills/">Dollar rises to one-month high on Fannie, Freddie rescue bill's progress</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/dollar-rises-to-one-month-high-on-fannie-freddie-rescue-bills/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1265885/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/24/dollar-rises-to-one-month-high-on-fannie-freddie-rescue-bills/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond market</category><category>British pound</category><category>Bush</category><category>Bush Administration</category><category>credit markets</category><category>defaults</category><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FNM</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>housing</category><category>housing sector</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Paulson</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><category>yen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer, lender groups seen scrutinizing Fed's new mortgage rules]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/consumer-lender-groups-seen-scrutinizing-feds-new-mortgage-rul/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/consumer-lender-groups-seen-scrutinizing-feds-new-mortgage-rul/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/consumer-lender-groups-seen-scrutinizing-feds-new-mortgage-rul/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The U.S. Federal Reserve will issue new rules next week aimed at <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/fed-to-raise-home-lending-standards/20080708082309990001">protecting future homebuyers</a> from questionable lending practices.<br /><br />Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke provided a preview of the Fed's new rules <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20080708a.htm">during a speech Tuesday</a> at the FDIC Forum on Mortgage Lending for Low/Moderate Income Households in Arlington, Va. Under the Fed's authorities, the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, the rules -- which will apply to all lenders, not just banks -- are expected to, among other reforms: <br />
<ul>
    <li>Restrict lenders from penalizing high-risk borrowers who pay off loans early.</li>
    <li>Bar lenders from making loans without proof of a borrower's income.</li>
    <li>Require lenders to make sure that borrowers set aside money to pay for taxes and insurance.</li>
</ul>
<strong>'Front end' / 'back end' ratios deemed key</strong><br /><br />Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks he's taking "a wait-and-see approach" regarding the Fed's mortgage regulation revisions. "This set of revised regulations could be, arguably, the most important federal regulation change, in financial terms, since the last plan to maintain the solvency of the Social Security trust fund," Dawson said.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/consumer-lender-groups-seen-scrutinizing-feds-new-mortgage-rul/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer, lender groups seen scrutinizing Fed's new mortgage rules</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/consumer-lender-groups-seen-scrutinizing-feds-new-mortgage-rul/">Consumer, lender groups seen scrutinizing Fed's new mortgage rules</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/consumer-lender-groups-seen-scrutinizing-feds-new-mortgage-rul/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1250480/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/consumer-lender-groups-seen-scrutinizing-feds-new-mortgage-rul/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>credit scores</category><category>defaults</category><category>Fed</category><category>FICO scores</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lenders</category><category>median home prices</category><category>mortgage bankers</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>mortgage regulations</category><category>mortgages</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martin Wolf: We need a mortgage system where banks, lenders have skin in the game]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/martin-wolf-we-need-a-mortgage-system-where-banks-lenders-have/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/martin-wolf-we-need-a-mortgage-system-where-banks-lenders-have/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/martin-wolf-we-need-a-mortgage-system-where-banks-lenders-have/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The ever-incisive <em>FT</em> columnist <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/52bf0f4a-1b8b-11dd-9e58-0000779fd2ac.html">Martin Wolf</a> offers prudent and timely advice concerning the reforms needed to ease credit market doldrums and right the global financial state of things. <br /><br />One key practice Wolf would like to see addressed is bank / mortgage lender selling of mortgages they originate. <br /><br />Designers of the practice had good intentions: It was designed to free-up capital so banks / mortgage lenders could have more money available for future homebuyers. A noble intention.<br /><br />Unfortunately, as tradition reminds us, the road to perdition (and record housing sector slumps) is paved with good intentions. The problem, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/52bf0f4a-1b8b-11dd-9e58-0000779fd2ac.html">Wolf notes</a>, is that the originate-and-distribute model encouraged banks / mortgage lenders to originate (in many cases for handsome fees) high-risk, very-poor-credit-quality mortgages with reckless abandon, because originators knew that the loan would be sold, and its status as a performing asset would be entirely someone else's problem. <em>Save the best (mortgages), get rid of the rest.</em> <br /><br />It's not surprising, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/52bf0f4a-1b8b-11dd-9e58-0000779fd2ac.html">Wolf notes</a>, that the originate-and-distribute model became laden with sloppy, irresponsible and even fraudulent loans. Wolf's reform: originators must be required to retain a portion of the equity of securitized loans. Hence, if / when they go bad, the originator loses money too. <br /><br /><strong>Economic Analysis:</strong> Wolf's proposed financial / bond market reform is on the mark. If every party, including the originator, has a stake in a mortgage's repayment status, that will lead to higher-quality loans, while at the same time retaining the secondary market's benefit of freeing-up capital for new mortgages.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/martin-wolf-we-need-a-mortgage-system-where-banks-lenders-have/">Martin Wolf: We need a mortgage system where banks, lenders have skin in the game</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 May 2008 17:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/martin-wolf-we-need-a-mortgage-system-where-banks-lenders-have/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1189368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/martin-wolf-we-need-a-mortgage-system-where-banks-lenders-have/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit crisis</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>defaults</category><category>housing</category><category>housing sector</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>mortgage lenders</category><category>mortgages</category><category>subprime</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Paulson and Bernanke: Subprime is (not) contained]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p>Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke are finally getting around to admitting that the subprime problem is not "contained." Regrettably, their grudging admission of reality also comes with a price -- they are unwilling to offer a solution to a problem whose magnitude they cannot even count. </p>
<p>This is the scariest part. According to the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/16/business/16rescue.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">New York Times</a></em>, at a speech in New York last night Bernanke said, "I'd like to know what those damn things are worth. Until investors are confident in their evaluations, they are not going to be willing to fund these vehicles."</p>
<p>This spring, <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/marketsNewsUS/idUKWBT00686520070420">Paulson</a> and <a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/28/110709.shtml">Bernanke</a> were singing the same hymn: "<strong><em>subprime is contained."</em></strong> The reasons? The administration's trademark combination of <strong>religion</strong> -- the desire to avoid a "moral hazard" -- coupled with <strong>incompetence</strong> -- a lack of awareness of the magnitude of the problem or how to solve it. Moral hazard is a concept I happen to agree with -- investors should <em>get the benefits</em> <strong>and</strong> <em>pay the costs</em> of their risky bets rather than asking the government to bail them out of their mistakes.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Paulson and Bernanke: Subprime is (not) contained</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/">Paulson and Bernanke: Subprime is (not) contained</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/16/business/16rescue.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1014267/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>defaults</category><category>hank paulson</category><category>HankPaulson</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mbs</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>MortgageBackedSecurities</category><category>subprime</category><category>subprime mortgage backed securities</category><category>SubprimeMortgageBackedSecurities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does America need a 'Mortgage Czar' to bail out foreclosures?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/does-america-need-a-mortgage-czar-to-bail-out-foreclosures/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/does-america-need-a-mortgage-czar-to-bail-out-foreclosures/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/does-america-need-a-mortgage-czar-to-bail-out-foreclosures/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/foreclosure.png" />You just have to love the U.S. -- marketing runs the majority of the world's largest economy, and when subprime lenders began using low interest rates to push shoddy mortgages onto clueless homebuyers years back, millions jumped on the bandwagon. If you weren't flipping houses for a living, you were getting into a much larger home with the feeling that those larger payments and mortgage term resets were years off. We're here now, and foreclosures are up while homeowners are losing their collective shirts. Is it the housing equivalent of the Titanic sinking? Nah -- but that's what many of the media portray it to be.<br /><br />But, in perfect "we can save this country" fashion, a few 'Crats on the Hill have decided that <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/democrats-call-for-mortgage-czar-aid/20071004064409990001">the U.S. needs a 'mortgage czar'</a> to protect us all from getting in over our heads with goofy mortgages. The prediction is that foreclosures will continue to escalate, so some lawmakers want $200 million to help those in over their heads make sure they don't lose their homes. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/does-america-need-a-mortgage-czar-to-bail-out-foreclosures/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does America need a 'Mortgage Czar' to bail out foreclosures?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/does-america-need-a-mortgage-czar-to-bail-out-foreclosures/">Does America need a 'Mortgage Czar' to bail out foreclosures?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/democrats-call-for-mortgage-czar-aid/20071004064409990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/does-america-need-a-mortgage-czar-to-bail-out-foreclosures/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1005238/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/does-america-need-a-mortgage-czar-to-bail-out-foreclosures/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>countrywide</category><category>defaults</category><category>democrats</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lenders</category><category>loans</category><category>mortgage czar</category><category>MortgageCzar</category><category>subprime meltdown</category><category>SubprimeMeltdown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deal master sees higher risk, more defaults in 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/deal-master-sees-higher-risk-more-defaults-in-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/deal-master-sees-higher-risk-more-defaults-in-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/deal-master-sees-higher-risk-more-defaults-in-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/gs.gif" id="vimage_1" /></p>
<p>Wilbur L. Ross has spent his career managing complex bankruptcies and restructurings. And he's pretty good at it -- he is now a billionaire. In fact, he's so good that Goldman Sachs recently partnered with him to start a fund to capitalize on prospective financial implosions.</p>
<p>Well, according to a <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews&amp;storyID=2006-11-29T180009Z_01_L29354332_RTRIDST_0_FINANCIAL-BANKRUPTCIES.XML">report</a> from Reuters, Ross thinks that 2007 will be a tough year, especially for companies that have loaded-up on debt for buyouts. He sees many more bankruptcies and as a result expects to see a 7% default rate on junk bonds. That would be an increase of 700%.</p>
<p>He also mentioned that the holders of junk bond debt have changed. There are now many hedge funds that have played in this market. If a leveraged company has problems, will a hedge fund really be interested in working with management? Or will the hedge fund use tough tactics to salvage the investment?</p>
<p>Another concern of Ross: he believes that in buyout deals, the multiples are simply too high.</p>
<p>In other words, if things go wrong, things are likely to unwind quickly. Of course, for Ross, this will mean more good times ahead.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and operates InvestorOffering.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/deal-master-sees-higher-risk-more-defaults-in-2007/">Deal master sees higher risk, more defaults in 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews&amp;storyID=2006-11-29T180009Z_01_L29354332_RTRIDST_0_FINANCIAL-BANKRUPTCIES.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/deal-master-sees-higher-risk-more-defaults-in-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/710279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/deal-master-sees-higher-risk-more-defaults-in-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bankruptcy</category><category>defaults</category><category>junk bonds</category><category>JunkBonds</category><category>Wilbur L. Ross</category><category>WilburL.Ross</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
