<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Are We in a Recession or a Depression?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/crystalballdown.jpg" />Are we in a recession or a depression? A <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Recession" class="inlinked">recession</a> usually means a temporary dip in an otherwise growing economy. A <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Depression" class="inlinked">depression</a> is much worse, feeding on itself and dragging the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/" class="inlinked">economy</a> lower and lower. A recession carries hope. A depression is pure hopelessness.</p>
<p>We have all kinds of forecasts, from extreme optimism to bleak pessimism. Government officials and the mainstream media are touting this as a dip in a <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Long-Term%20Growth,LTG" class="inlinked">long-term growth</a> cycle.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are We in a Recession or a Depression?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/">Are We in a Recession or a Depression?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19613072/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>David Rosenberg</category><category>depression</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Is a Depression?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/what-is-depression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/what-is-depression/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/what-is-depression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/define/" rel="tag">Define Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p>As if the credit crunch recession hasn't been painful enough, some economists have warned at the depth of the recession that the it could tip over into a full-blown depression. So what exactly is a depression, and how could it be any worse than a recession?
<p>"A recession is when your neighbor loses his job. A depression is when you lose your job," according to <a href="http://economics.about.com/cs/businesscycles/a/depressions.htm">About.com</a>. This definition may be an example of economist black humor, but it does contain a seed of truth.<br />
<br />
The conventional definition of a recession, however, is where the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declines for two or more consecutive quarters. This is a fairly crude measure, so some economists like to factor in additional measures such as unemployment, industrial output and retail sales. The key point, however, is that a quarter-on-quarter deterioration in these measures will result in a recession being called out.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/what-is-depression/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What Is a Depression?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/what-is-depression/">What Is a Depression?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogsmith.aol.com/content/posts/edit/19392863/Null>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/what-is-depression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19392863/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/what-is-depression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest blogger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are we going to crash again?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/are-we-going-to-crash-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/are-we-going-to-crash-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/are-we-going-to-crash-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/benjamin-franklin.jpg" alt="" />It has been about a year since Lehman Brothers failed and this financial crisis started, and it has hit many of the banks hard including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of American</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">America International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>).</p>
<p>There has been one thing that has been bugged me in the coverage of it since then. Frequently, reporters use words like <em>unprecedented</em> or <em>unparalleled</em> to describe it. That is false! Financial crises, panics, crashes, bubbles, and bank failures are really about a dime a dozen.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/are-we-going-to-crash-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are we going to crash again?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/are-we-going-to-crash-again/">Are we going to crash again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/are-we-going-to-crash-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19159491/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/are-we-going-to-crash-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>depression</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>Financial Crisis</category><category>inflation</category><category>Panic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Robert Shiller says we need more economic stimulus to avoid Depression]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/robert-shiller-says-we-need-more-economic-stimulus-to-avoid-depr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/robert-shiller-says-we-need-more-economic-stimulus-to-avoid-depr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/robert-shiller-says-we-need-more-economic-stimulus-to-avoid-depr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/destitute_man_gov_photo.gif" />
<p> </p>
Everyone has an opinion about whether the economic stimulus package is too big or too small, but he's an opinion worth listening to: Robert Shiller.
<p> </p>
<p>As one of the few people to publicly call the internet and real estate bubbles for what they were, he has more credibility than just about anyone. And he's saying the stimulus package is too small and we need more if we are to avert another depression.</p>
<p>In an <a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=abXAaO4xI704">op-ed piece for Bloomberg</a>, Shiller writes that "In the face of a similar Depression-era psychology today, we are in need of massive pump-priming again. We appear to be in a much better situation due to the stronger efforts to date. Still, there is a danger that, because of a combination of faulty economic theory and inadequate appreciation of human psychology, as well as deep public anger, we will not continue with such stimulus on a high enough level."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/robert-shiller-says-we-need-more-economic-stimulus-to-avoid-depr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Robert Shiller says we need more economic stimulus to avoid Depression</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/robert-shiller-says-we-need-more-economic-stimulus-to-avoid-depr/">Robert Shiller says we need more economic stimulus to avoid Depression</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=abXAaO4xI704>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/robert-shiller-says-we-need-more-economic-stimulus-to-avoid-depr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1517548/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/robert-shiller-says-we-need-more-economic-stimulus-to-avoid-depr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Depression</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Recession</category><category>Robert Shiller</category><category>RobertShiller</category><category>Stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Doomsday Scenario: Craig's List is another nail in the news coffin]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Ah, yes. Tuesday, baseball season, and new NCAA champs. Sigh. Online classified ad growth <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/online-classifieds-soar-84-in-february-craigslist-dominates-8620/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">skyrocketed by 84% in February, according to Hitwise</a> (tip to <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com">MarketingCharts.com</a>). The bad news? Craig's List and other free classified sites dominated the growth, further sealing the doom of newspapers. Steve Ruble of Micropersuasion <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2009/04/the-future-of-advertising.html">interviewed Jeff Jarvis of "What Would Google Do?" fame (and Buzzsaw, of course)</a> and asked what the future of online advertising was. The reply? Bleak to non-existent.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Doomsday Scenario: Craig's List is another nail in the news coffin</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/">Doomsday Scenario: Craig's List is another nail in the news coffin</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1510914/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>consumption</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>credit markets</category><category>CreditCrunch</category><category>CreditMarkets</category><category>depression</category><category>great depression</category><category>GreatDepression</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Doomsday Scenario: Lame Treasury auctions, travel numbers shot down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/doomsday-scenario-lame-treasury-auctions-travel-numbers-shot-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/doomsday-scenario-lame-treasury-auctions-travel-numbers-shot-d/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/doomsday-scenario-lame-treasury-auctions-travel-numbers-shot-d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/pw2000_1_low.jpg" alt="" />Another day, more wonderful news. If the rally last week left you feeling peppy, alas, global debt markets didn't share your enthusiasm -- <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/articles/index/a/21838">witness the extremely tepid reception</a> a new round of U.S. and U.K. debt offerings got from buyers today. Air travel numbers <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aQhmPYgeA1Fw&amp;refer=home">were horrific, indicating, by some opinions, a dire summer for the perennially strapped industry</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/doomsday-scenario-lame-treasury-auctions-travel-numbers-shot-d/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Doomsday Scenario: Lame Treasury auctions, travel numbers shot down</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/doomsday-scenario-lame-treasury-auctions-travel-numbers-shot-d/">Doomsday Scenario: Lame Treasury auctions, travel numbers shot down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/doomsday-scenario-lame-treasury-auctions-travel-numbers-shot-d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1498527/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/doomsday-scenario-lame-treasury-auctions-travel-numbers-shot-d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>air travel</category><category>depression</category><category>doomsday</category><category>Fed</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>recession</category><category>volcker</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Volcker says this could be worse than the Great Depression]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/21/volcker-says-this-could-be-worse-than-the-great-depression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/21/volcker-says-this-could-be-worse-than-the-great-depression/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/21/volcker-says-this-could-be-worse-than-the-great-depression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/paulvolcker.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Former Federal Reserve chair and current presidential adviser Paul Volcker says that the global economy may be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE51J5JM20090221">deteriorating even more precipitously</a> than it did during the Great Depression.</p>
<p>"I don't remember any time, maybe even in the Great Depression, when things went down quite so fast, quite so uniformly around the world," he said at a Columbia University luncheon. He also dismissed the notion that the financial innovation of the past decade has had any positive results: "There is little correlation between sophistication of a banking system and productivity growth."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/21/volcker-says-this-could-be-worse-than-the-great-depression/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Volcker says this could be worse than the Great Depression</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/21/volcker-says-this-could-be-worse-than-the-great-depression/">Volcker says this could be worse than the Great Depression</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/21/volcker-says-this-could-be-worse-than-the-great-depression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1467415/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/21/volcker-says-this-could-be-worse-than-the-great-depression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accounting standards</category><category>banking regulation</category><category>Depression</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Paul Volcker</category><category>productivity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How the U.S. economy is like GM]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/how-the-u-s-economy-is-like-gm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/how-the-u-s-economy-is-like-gm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/how-the-u-s-economy-is-like-gm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-24-200cm101608.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) problems are well known: declining growth, huge debts, and enormous contingent liabilities (such as for retirement and health care benefits).</p>
<p>Yes, it also sounds like the U.S. economy, huh?</p>
<p>Well, this is the gloomy assessment from Ray Dalio, who is the chief investment officer of Bridgewater Associates. A few years ago, he warned about the overleveraged economy. More importantly, he positioned his portfolio for the New Reality.</p>
<p>In fact, in 2008 the Bridgewater Pure Alpha 1 fund was up 8.7% and the #2 vintage increased 9.4%.</p>
<p>So, what's is his thinking now? Unfortunately, it's fairly gloomy (this is according to a great interview in this week's <a href="http://www.barrons.com">Barron's</a>, which is a paid publication).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/how-the-u-s-economy-is-like-gm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How the U.S. economy is like GM</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/how-the-u-s-economy-is-like-gm/">How the U.S. economy is like GM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/how-the-u-s-economy-is-like-gm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1453250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/how-the-u-s-economy-is-like-gm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bridgewater Associates</category><category>Depression</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>Ray Dalio</category><category>recession</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Holding GE shares? CEO talks about an economic depression]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/holding-ge-shares-ceo-talks-about-an-economic-depression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/holding-ge-shares-ceo-talks-about-an-economic-depression/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/holding-ge-shares-ceo-talks-about-an-economic-depression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" />Jeff Immelt, the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), said the economy could get worse, much worse. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9cdf7854-f3b6-11dd-9c4b-0000779fd2ac.html">According to</a> the <em>FT, </em>he said "Unlike the other downturns that I've been a part of, this one is faced with limited liquidity," Mr Immelt, GE's chief since 2001 told a conference. "Once you break through '74-'75, you don't stop 'til you get to 1929."</p>
<p>There is a lot of shock value to the comment, but GE shareholders ought to consider the statement as their stock trades at multi-year lows.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/holding-ge-shares-ceo-talks-about-an-economic-depression/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Holding GE shares? CEO talks about an economic depression</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/holding-ge-shares-ceo-talks-about-an-economic-depression/">Holding GE shares? CEO talks about an economic depression</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/holding-ge-shares-ceo-talks-about-an-economic-depression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1452228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/holding-ge-shares-ceo-talks-about-an-economic-depression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>GE</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Money story of the year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-money-story-of-the-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-money-story-of-the-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-money-story-of-the-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/best-worst-200x267-story-of-year.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature. </em></p>
<p>The year 2008 brought the word "greed" to new levels with major companies going bankrupt thanks to the greed of their top execs, who were more worried about lining their own pockets than about the interests of their customers and shareholders. This greed also helped to fuel the housing bubble that burst and sent home prices falling in what seems like an unending downward spiral. As the financial news continues to worsen, it's hard to pick the biggest money story of the year. We've pulled together our top four picks, and it's up to you to vote on the biggest money story of the year.</p>
<p><iframe align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=157428&amp;pollId=157708&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance" frameborder="0" width="205" height="200"></iframe>Here are our top four picks in alphabetical order: </p>
<p><strong>Collapse of Wall Street</strong><br />The world hasn't seen so many Wall Street firms go bust since the Great Depression, and we seem to be teetering on the edge of another worldwide depression. Top Wall Street execs pocketed millions, and in some cases, billions of dollars thanks to sales of complex financial instruments that it appears no one truly understood (or if they did understand their toxic natures they perpetrated a huge fraud on the investors who bought them). Now these same executives pocket millions in golden parachutes as they leave the firms they destroyed. And, while they enjoy their millions, investors, customers and employees of these now defunct or badly bruised firms face destroyed careers and/or portfolios.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-money-story-of-the-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Money story of the year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-money-story-of-the-year/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Money story of the year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-money-story-of-the-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1385525/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-money-story-of-the-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>depression</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>featured</category><category>fraud</category><category>fuel prices</category><category>greed</category><category>home prices</category><category>housing prices</category><category>mortgages</category><category>oil</category><category>recession</category><category>subprime</category><category>toxic assets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is unemployment really above 10%?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img height="339" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />If people don't know this, it is worth pointing out. If they do, it is worth repeating. Unemployment in the U.S. is well above 10%. The government numbers do not include those people who are "no longer looking for work" or those who are not receiving unemployment payments.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/06/business/economy/06idle.html?ref=business">According to <em>The New York Times</em></a>, "The Labor Department does publish an alternate measure of unemployment, which counts part-time workers who want full-time work, as well as anyone who has looked for work in the last year."</p>
<p>That would put the total "unemployment" rate closer to 13%.</p>
<p>It raises the issue of how close the U.S. is to the much higher rates of joblessness in the Great Depression. The number of people without work rose to 25%. The government did not make the distinctions then by subtracting people who were part-time.</p>
<p>If, using the government's yard stick, unemployment in the U.S. gets to the double digits next year, the economy is closer to a depression than it might appear.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/">Is unemployment really above 10%?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: VIX indicates potential soft depression]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/options-update-duration-of-vix-at-elevated-levels-indicates-pot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/options-update-duration-of-vix-at-elevated-levels-indicates-pot/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/options-update-duration-of-vix-at-elevated-levels-indicates-pot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source="><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></a>The CBOE Volatility Index <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cboe-volatility-index/%24vix.x/opr">(VIX</a>) is recently up 3.62 to 71.26, above its 500-day moving average of 20.77, 200-day moving average of 30.38, 100-day moving average of 38.09, 50-day moving average of 53.53 and 10-day average of 64.18 according to Track Data. This suggests that the market is pricing in an upcoming soft economic depression.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) is recently down $2.10 to $9.45. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Chief Executive Steve Ballmer said today that talks with YHOO are "finished." Ballmer remains open to a potential search deal with YHOO. YHOO December option implied volatility of 133 is above its 26-week average of 63 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/options-update-duration-of-vix-at-elevated-levels-indicates-pot/">Options Update: VIX indicates potential soft depression</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/options-update-duration-of-vix-at-elevated-levels-indicates-pot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1377170/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/options-update-duration-of-vix-at-elevated-levels-indicates-pot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>VIX</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pfizer cancels obesity drug, the latest to do so]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/pfizer-cancels-obesity-drug-the-latest-to-do-so/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/pfizer-cancels-obesity-drug-the-latest-to-do-so/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/pfizer-cancels-obesity-drug-the-latest-to-do-so/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bmy/" rel="tag">Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p>The stock price of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) has been declining this morning. Pfizer <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/ahead-of-the-bell-canceled-obesity-drugs/rfid155796824?channel=%22pf%22">canceled the development of an obesity drug</a> for which many had high hopes, especially in light of the looming 2011 Lipitor blockbuster cholesterol drug patent expiration. Pfizer may find it hard to post growth without it.<br /><br />Pfizer is not the only pharma that has recently canceled the same class of obesity drugs. Only Wednesday, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sanofi-aventis-sa/sny/nys">Sanofy Aventis</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sanofi-aventis-sa/sny/nys">SNY</a>), after stopping sales in Europe of its version of the drug, Acomplia, also stopped clinical trials on humans. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">Merck &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>) stopped development of a similar drug candidate called Taranabant a few weeks ago. Those companies all had high hopes the drug could be used for smoking, diabetes and high cholesterol along with obesity. According to Bloomberg, only <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">BMY</a>) is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aevA_B.eWlOA&amp;refer=us">still developing</a> a similar medicine. <br /><br />Why are they all stopping? Mostly because they figured regulators around the world will not approve the drug due to negative psychiatric side-effects. This class of drug works on blocking the pleasure centers in the brain, specifically, it blocks the cannabinoid type 1, or CB1, receptors. If cannabinoid sounds familiar, it is because this is the very same pleasure centers that give marijuana smokers the "munchies." By blocking these centers, studies have shown people have become depressed and had suicidal thoughts.<br /><br />Perhaps not having chemical and pharmaceutical degrees I'm missing something, but it seems rather straight forward that if one's pleasure centers are blocked, depression could ensue. Even if it just blocks one specific type, that could be enough to create an imbalance. <br /><br />Usually regulators weigh costs, risks and benefits of the drug and the condition treated, often approving drugs with severe side effects. These drugs are our best option currently. But drug companies should change their attitude somewhat, and when developing new drugs, place more emphasis on looking at the the body as one whole entity, and see how the drug interacts with the rest of the body, not just if it can treat the specific condition.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/pfizer-cancels-obesity-drug-the-latest-to-do-so/">Pfizer cancels obesity drug, the latest to do so</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/ahead-of-the-bell-canceled-obesity-drugs/rfid155796824?channel=%22pf%22>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/pfizer-cancels-obesity-drug-the-latest-to-do-so/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1364215/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/pfizer-cancels-obesity-drug-the-latest-to-do-so/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Acomplia</category><category>bmy</category><category>depression</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mrk</category><category>obesity</category><category>pfe</category><category>sny</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What is a 'depression'?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/what-is-a-depression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/what-is-a-depression/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/what-is-a-depression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/destitute_man_gov_photo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The <em>Financial Times </em>was good enough to ask what the difference between a "recession" and a "depression" is. The paper did not have an answer. The author of the articles writes <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/93a68434-9c55-11dd-a42e-000077b07658.html">what any historian of the economy already knows</a>: "From 1929 through 1933, the United States saw real economic output fall by nearly a third and unemployment soar from 3 per cent to 25 per cent."</p>
<p>Depending on who is counting, the U.S. has had ten recessions since the end of WWII. These are identified by the classic definition that says a recession is two quarters of GDP growth shrinkage.</p>
<p>The oil embargo of 1973 caused the last really nasty depression that most Americans can remember. Unemployment went over 8%. In the 1981 recession, that figure moved over 10%. </p>
<p>What would a depression look like? Probably a period when GDP dropped by 5% for three or four quarters in a row and unemployment was steady above 10%. That may seem arbitrary, but the numbers would be much worse than any period since WWII. Almost no one living would remember a similar period. People's memories of what is economically awful should be taken into account. Bad times are only really bad if someone can put them in reference to their own memories and experience.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/what-is-a-depression/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What is a 'depression'?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/what-is-a-depression/">What is a 'depression'?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/what-is-a-depression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1345985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/18/what-is-a-depression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>GDP</category><category>recession</category><category>retail sales</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[An American depression]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/an-american-depression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/an-american-depression/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/an-american-depression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>Most of what the public hears from the government and from the media indicates that the economy is sliding into a recession, perhaps a deep one. Consumers is not buying that at all. They see the world in much more dire shape.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/06/news/economy/depression_poll/index.htm?postversion=2008100616">According to</a> the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll, "Nearly six out of ten Americans believe another economic depression is likely." And those surveyed know what a depression is. They understand that it would mean a 25% unemployment rate, bank failures and an increasing number of homeless Americans.</p>
<p>Most economist asked to respond to the results said that no depression is likely. They government's current programs to buttress the economy are too widespread. Unemployment might hit 7% or a bit more, but that would be it.</p>
<p>Of course, many economists were slow in calling the recession, so their track records as forecasters are in doubt.</p>
<p>What stands out from the survey is the extent to which Americans have succumbed to a feeling of despair and hopelessness. To be resigned to the near-complete death of the economy and almost unimaginable national suffering gives every indication of people being certain that the worst is coming and believing it is a near-certainty.</p>
<p>The depression may not come to the economy, but it has certainly come to the minds of the average working person.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/an-american-depression/">An American depression</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/06/news/economy/depression_poll/index.htm?postversion=2008100616>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/an-american-depression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1334946/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/an-american-depression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kissing cousins: The Wall Street collapse and media hype]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/28/kissing-cousins-the-wall-street-collapse-and-media-hype/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/28/kissing-cousins-the-wall-street-collapse-and-media-hype/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/28/kissing-cousins-the-wall-street-collapse-and-media-hype/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="147" width="220" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dan_solin_5668-%28wince%29.jpg" alt="" />Let's see if I can touch on your worst fears:</p>
<p>A collapse of the banking system and the insolvency of the FDIC is surely among them.</p>
<p>The Comptroller General advised the Senate Banking Committee that both were likely <em><strong>in April, 1991.</strong></em></p>
<p>An "unprecedented" worldwide "economic convulsion" -- <em>Newsweek</em> used the quoted language <em><strong>in September, 1998.</strong></em></p>
<p>A fundamental change in the world's economic condition. <em>Fortune</em> reported on that view <em><strong>in September, 1998</strong></em>.</p>
<p>The worst economic conditions since the Depression. <em>Time </em>made that observation <em><strong>in June, 1970</strong></em>.</p>
<p>Investor "shock felt round the world" was breathlessly reported by <em>Time</em> <em><strong>in November, 1987</strong></em>, complete with a story about a trader who withdrew $100 from his ATM because it gave him "a sense of security."</p>
<p>Pillars of the NYSE crumbling from the onslaught of a huge bear graced the cover of <em>Newsweek <strong>in September, 1974.</strong></em></p>
<p>The triple whammy of "inflation, recession and a frantic bear market" was reported by<em><strong> </strong>Life</em> magazine on the cover of its <em><strong>June 5, 1970 </strong></em>issue.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/28/kissing-cousins-the-wall-street-collapse-and-media-hype/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kissing cousins: The Wall Street collapse and media hype</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/28/kissing-cousins-the-wall-street-collapse-and-media-hype/">Kissing cousins: The Wall Street collapse and media hype</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/28/kissing-cousins-the-wall-street-collapse-and-media-hype/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1326868/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/28/kissing-cousins-the-wall-street-collapse-and-media-hype/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>Dan Solin</category><category>Depression</category><category>financial collapse</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>John Bogle</category><category>Little Book of Common Sense Investing</category><category>recession</category><category>Wall Street</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Solin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The most negative economist in the world]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/17/the-most-negative-economist-in-the-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/17/the-most-negative-economist-in-the-world/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/17/the-most-negative-economist-in-the-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/destitute_man_gov_photo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Nouriel Roubini, a professor at New York University, has recently been profiled in both <em>Barron's </em>and <em>The New York Times.</em> There may be nothing special about his training or methods, but what is fairly unique is his opinion that we are on the brink of a modern version of the Great Depression.</p>
<p>It is hard to say why the media wants to give his analysis voice, but he has become the object of almost endless fascination.</p>
<p>The foundation of his view of the economy is that the current housing disaster will get much, much worse and that banks will end up writing off almost $1.5 trillion in mortgage-related paper. That is about three times what they have taken as charges so far. <em>The New York Times </em>quotes Roubini as saying, "A good third of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/17/magazine/17pessimist-t.html?pagewanted=3&amp;_r=1&amp;ref=business">regional banks won't make it</a>."</p>
<p>While a number of experts believe that the recession could last a year, Roubini would he called an extremist by most measures. He foresees a downturn lasting 18 months.</p>
<p>The media does not like Roubini because he may be right. They like him because predictions of great economic collapse and mayhem sell papers. That is too bad. The public deserves a more balanced view.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/17/the-most-negative-economist-in-the-world/">The most negative economist in the world</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/17/the-most-negative-economist-in-the-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1286711/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/17/the-most-negative-economist-in-the-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>economists</category><category>housing crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nouriel Roubini</category><category>regional banks</category><category>Roubini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: No, the sky is not falling]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/28/the-sky-is-falling-no-its-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/28/the-sky-is-falling-no-its-not/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/28/the-sky-is-falling-no-its-not/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><em><strong><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/comfortzone.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Ted Allrich </strong>is the founder of <a href="http://www.theonlineinvestor.com/">The Online Investor</a> and author of the just released book: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Comfort-Zone-Investing-Build-Wealth/dp/0312358946/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1209316043&amp;sr=8-1">Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. </a>In this weekly column, he'll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.</em><br /><br />We are heading for a crisis of confidence, confidence in the core of the U.S. economy, the capitalist way of life, starting with financial institutions and permeating every other industry from autos to homebuilders. Investors wonder if institutions as we know them will survive. Will foreign firms buy every American company? Or will they dry up and blow away? Will all the banks shut down? Stock prices suggest many investors are thinking maybe all of these will happen.
<p> </p>
<p>And why not? <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) announced it won't introduce a new F-150 truck, the best selling truck of all time. The reason: there are acres and acres of old F-150s sitting on dealer lots that no one wants. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General</a> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">Motors </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) is shutting truck plants longer than usual since very few of its big moneymakers are moving off lots. Homebuilders are showing huge losses and all of them say there is no light at the end of this dark tunnel. Bank news gets worse each day, with headlines screaming that we aren't near to knowing how bad this mortgage and credit crisis really is.</p>
<p>There is no shelter in this storm. Everywhere investors look, they see more dark clouds. Most of them believe that it gets darkest just before it get pitch black. Is the American dream gone, turned into an economic nightmare, the likes of which we haven't seen since the Depression?</p>
<p>Hardly. During the depression, over 30% of the workforce wasn't working. Prices were constantly going lower as fewer and fewer goods were sold. All the banks were shut for a "Bank Holiday" for three days shortly after Roosevelt was elected. People were roaming the country, looking for a job, anything to keep food on the table for their families. If the American dream were going to die, it would have done so in the late 30's and early 40's. But it didn't.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/28/the-sky-is-falling-no-its-not/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: No, the sky is not falling</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/28/the-sky-is-falling-no-its-not/">Comfort Zone Investing: No, the sky is not falling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.theonlineinvestor.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/28/the-sky-is-falling-no-its-not/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1236554/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/28/the-sky-is-falling-no-its-not/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>ComfortZoneInvesting</category><category>Depression</category><category>featured</category><category>recession</category><category>Ted Allrich</category><category>TedAllrich</category><category>US economy</category><category>UsEconomy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mortgage mess impacting commercial real estate lending]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/mortgage-mess-impacting-commercial-real-estate-lending/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/mortgage-mess-impacting-commercial-real-estate-lending/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/mortgage-mess-impacting-commercial-real-estate-lending/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/construction.jpg" />Commercial real estate developers are no longer immune to the credit crunch hitting residential real estate owners and developers, according to today's <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120049652331694709.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">Wall Street Journal</a>. </em>Yesterday in visible proof of the problem, a Las Vegas casino developer, Bruce Eichner, defaulted on a $750 million loan from Deutsche Bank because he was not able to refinance the debt. It's not the first time he's been caught up in a credit crunch. The <em>Journal</em> reports he lost several projects in New York City during its real estate downturn in the early 1990s. </p>
<p>The <em>Journal </em>also points out he's not the only one having trouble getting refinancing. Other commercial developers in trouble according to the Journal include:</p>
<ul>
    <li> A major Australian shopping mall developer, one of the largest owners of shopping centers in the U.S., has been unable to refinance $3.4 billion in short-term debt.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>New York developer Harry Macklowe, who bought office buildings at the top of the commercial real estate market, can't refinance $7 billion in debt that's due in February. He's trying to sell his General Motors Building in midtown Manhattan to come up with cash. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/mortgage-mess-impacting-commercial-real-estate-lending/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mortgage mess impacting commercial real estate lending</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/mortgage-mess-impacting-commercial-real-estate-lending/">Mortgage mess impacting commercial real estate lending</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120054012983095939.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/mortgage-mess-impacting-commercial-real-estate-lending/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1089222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/mortgage-mess-impacting-commercial-real-estate-lending/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bruce eichner</category><category>BruceEichner</category><category>commercial real estate</category><category>CommercialRealEstate</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>CreditCrunch</category><category>depression</category><category>harry macklowe</category><category>HarryMacklowe</category><category>mortgage mess</category><category>MortgageMess</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Moody's thinks house prices will bottom in early 2009]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/07/moodys-thinks-house-prices-will-bottom-in-early-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/07/moodys-thinks-house-prices-will-bottom-in-early-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/07/moodys-thinks-house-prices-will-bottom-in-early-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p>Everybody's been wondering when the housing market will finally hit bottom. Moody's decided to take a stab at that question with its new extensive report, "Aftershock: Housing in the Wake of the Mortgage Meltdown." It will cost you $3,995 to order the full report, but you can read excerpts from its <a href="http://www.economy.com/home/products/special-study-series/2007/december/aftershock/default.asp?src=homepage">Executive Summary.</a></p>
<p>While Moody's agrees the outlook for housing is daunting, it expects as the most likely scenario that housing should bottom by early 2009. That bottom is expected to result in an average annual national house price decline of 12%. Of course, some areas will be much harder hit and parts of Florida and California are predicted to bottom out with a 30% loss from the housing price peak. </p>
<p>Moody's believes the fallout from the current housing recession -- yes, they do call this a recession -- will be serious enough to characterize what we're now living through as a housing crash. Anyone doubting it? Moody's expects housing sales to hit bottom in early 2008, declining over 40% from their peak. Housing starts will reach their lowest point in mid-2008 and fall by 55% from their peak. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/07/moodys-thinks-house-prices-will-bottom-in-early-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Moody's thinks house prices will bottom in early 2009</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/07/moodys-thinks-house-prices-will-bottom-in-early-2009/">Moody's thinks house prices will bottom in early 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.economy.com/home/products/special-study-series/2007/december/aftershock/default.asp?src=homepage>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/07/moodys-thinks-house-prices-will-bottom-in-early-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1057534/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/07/moodys-thinks-house-prices-will-bottom-in-early-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>housing</category><category>housing bubble</category><category>HousingBubble</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:17:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
