<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Bulls Buying Calls in Research in Motion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bulls-buying-calls-in-research-in-motion-rimm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bulls-buying-calls-in-research-in-motion-rimm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bulls-buying-calls-in-research-in-motion-rimm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><img  border="1" hspace="4" alt="Research in Motion RIMM logo" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/rimm.jpg" />Research in Motion (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) shares closed down Wednesday, under-performing the broader market, which finished near break even. RIMM didn't report any news of its own accord, but investors likely reacted to an ill-received earnings guidance from mobile-phone peer Nokia Corporation (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">NOK</a>). A large-scale options trader evidently used yesterday's pullback as an opportunity to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.onn.tv/volatility-overlays/buying-upside-in-research-in-motion-nasdaqrimm-ahead-of-earnings/">scoop up some longer-dated call options</a>. <br />
<br />
Early yesterday, a block of around 7,000 out-of-the-money January 85 calls hit the tape for $1.45 per contract ($145 apiece), for a total premium of slightly more than $1 million paid. While open interest is already 10,000 at this strike, it appears these calls were bought to open, judging from an increase in implied volatility (and the fact that these options have more than six months until expiration).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bulls-buying-calls-in-research-in-motion-rimm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bulls Buying Calls in Research in Motion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bulls-buying-calls-in-research-in-motion-rimm/">Bulls Buying Calls in Research in Motion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.onn.tv/volatility-overlays/buying-upside-in-research-in-motion-nasdaqrimm-ahead-of-earnings/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bulls-buying-calls-in-research-in-motion-rimm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19519323/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/bulls-buying-calls-in-research-in-motion-rimm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>call buying</category><category>call options</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options trading</category><category>Research In Motion</category><category>RIM</category><category>RIMM</category><category>speculation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: CBOE Volatility Index up 20%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/options-update-cboe-volatility-index-up-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/options-update-cboe-volatility-index-up-20/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/options-update-cboe-volatility-index-up-20/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /><strong>CBOE Volatility Index</strong></a> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/lookup/vix/usa">VIX</a>) up 3.50 to 20.98, above 50-day moving average of 17.83; S&amp;P 500 recently down 1.71%.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a></strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) is recently up 81c to $152.88. GS call option volume of 60,274 contracts compares to put volume of 63,724 contracts. May put option implied volatility is at 44, June is at 41; above its 26-week average of 33 according to Track Data. GS June 175 calls volatility is at 37, June 125 put volatility is at 58, suggesting traders taking positions for downside price movement.</p>
<p><em>Update is by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/options-update-cboe-volatility-index-up-20/">Options Update: CBOE Volatility Index up 20%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/options-update-cboe-volatility-index-up-20/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19456022/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/options-update-cboe-volatility-index-up-20/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBOE Volatility Index VIX</category><category>CboeVolatilityIndexVix</category><category>derivatives</category><category>GS</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bill Requires Derivatives to Be Traded on Centralized Exchanges]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/bill-requires-derivatives-to-be-traded-on-centralized-exchanges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/bill-requires-derivatives-to-be-traded-on-centralized-exchanges/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/bill-requires-derivatives-to-be-traded-on-centralized-exchanges/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/fed-reaction.jpg" alt="" />The issue of regulating derivatives trading has been festering since last year. The banking industry's lobbying to bury the legislation has been fierce.</p>
<p>So far, derivatives trades, including credit default swaps (CDSs) and <span style="visibility: visible;" id="main"><span style="visibility: visible;" id="search">collateralized debt obligations (</span></span>CDOs), have been kept secret between parties. Proposals to make this information public are creating a warlike atmosphere between lobbyists and Congress.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/bill-requires-derivatives-to-be-traded-on-centralized-exchanges/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bill Requires Derivatives to Be Traded on Centralized Exchanges</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/bill-requires-derivatives-to-be-traded-on-centralized-exchanges/">Bill Requires Derivatives to Be Traded on Centralized Exchanges</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/bill-requires-derivatives-to-be-traded-on-centralized-exchanges/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19439331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/bill-requires-derivatives-to-be-traded-on-centralized-exchanges/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blanche Lincoln</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AIG Derivative Exit Costs $2 Billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/aig-derivative-exit-costs-2-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/aig-derivative-exit-costs-2-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/aig-derivative-exit-costs-2-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/aig-logo-240x160.jpg" />Last year, American International Group (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) lost up to $2 billion because its <a target="_blank" href="http://www.postonline.co.uk/reinsurance/news/1600641/aig-unit-unwinds-cds-positions">Financial Products group unwound most of its remaining trades</a> with Goldman Sachs (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>). Of course, this was the situation that led to the insurer's near-collapse in September 2008. The losses sustained last year resulted from AIG's continued efforts to extract itself from a precarious financial situation. <br />
<br />
AIG's realized losses came on approximately $3 billion in mortgage-collateralized debt positions. After last year's extrication, AIG has $1.3 billion in CDOs with Goldman Sachs, because the company believed the positions could perform better than their current prices would reveal.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/aig-derivative-exit-costs-2-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AIG Derivative Exit Costs $2 Billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/aig-derivative-exit-costs-2-billion/">AIG Derivative Exit Costs $2 Billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.postonline.co.uk/reinsurance/news/1600641/aig-unit-unwinds-cds-positions>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/aig-derivative-exit-costs-2-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19435532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/aig-derivative-exit-costs-2-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>collateralized debt obligations</category><category>derivatives</category><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S.: Too Many Financial Engineers, Not Enough Civil Engineers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/u-s-too-many-financial-engineers-not-enough-civil-engineers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/u-s-too-many-financial-engineers-not-enough-civil-engineers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/u-s-too-many-financial-engineers-not-enough-civil-engineers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/wall-street-subway-sign.jpg" />One trend that has to reverse for the U.S. economy to return to premiere economy status: the trend of top talent toward financial services and away from other fields, including engineering, and the natural sciences. <br /> <br /> The income gap between those who went into finance (for example as hedge fund managers and/or product designers of derivatives, credit default swaps, and other investment instruments) and those who went in to mechanical engineering or civil engineering widened considerably during the past 20 years: and where do think a lot of the talent went? You guessed it, in to designing derivatives, etc.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/u-s-too-many-financial-engineers-not-enough-civil-engineers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S.: Too Many Financial Engineers, Not Enough Civil Engineers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/u-s-too-many-financial-engineers-not-enough-civil-engineers/">U.S.: Too Many Financial Engineers, Not Enough Civil Engineers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/u-s-too-many-financial-engineers-not-enough-civil-engineers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19354511/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/u-s-too-many-financial-engineers-not-enough-civil-engineers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>credit default swaps</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Volcker</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank's plan for regulating derivatives comes up short]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/barney_frank_160.jpg" />House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank has <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amik0fY5tT7c">a new proposal to regulate bank transactions</a>. Some of it is OK and some of it perpetuates the abuses that brought Lehman and other financial institutions to their knees.</p>
<p>First the OK part. Frank's proposal would require over-the-counter derivatives to be traded on listed exchanges and sold on exchanges or processed through a regulation platform. This is not good enough. We need transparency for each and every trade done by each and every financial institution. That means that <strong>all trades must be done on a listed exchange and cleared through a clearinghouse.</strong> All of this data can be put on computers and monitored daily. Then if some trader goes beyond established guidelines, he will be shut down immediately.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barney Frank's plan for regulating derivatives comes up short</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/">Barney Frank's plan for regulating derivatives comes up short</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183195/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/barney-franks-plan-for-regulating-derivatives-comes-up-short/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank reform</category><category>bank regulation</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>naked short selling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[High stakes poker! The government vs. the bankers on derivatives regulation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/high-stakes-poker-the-government-vs-the-bankers-on-derivatives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/high-stakes-poker-the-government-vs-the-bankers-on-derivatives/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/high-stakes-poker-the-government-vs-the-bankers-on-derivatives/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/wall-street-subway-sign.jpg" />If you think the health care debate is a big brouhaha, its nothing compared to the behind the scenes battle over government regulation of derivatives.</p>
<p>On the government side <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=agFM_w6e2i00">we have a proposal</a> that would require the most standard derivatives to be processed through a clearinghouse, whose members would make good on any default. This is the way the commodity markets operate. For "nonstandardized contracts," banks would have to put up more capital or margin.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/high-stakes-poker-the-government-vs-the-bankers-on-derivatives/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>High stakes poker! The government vs. the bankers on derivatives regulation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/high-stakes-poker-the-government-vs-the-bankers-on-derivatives/">High stakes poker! The government vs. the bankers on derivatives regulation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=agFM_w6e2i00>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/high-stakes-poker-the-government-vs-the-bankers-on-derivatives/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19146602/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/high-stakes-poker-the-government-vs-the-bankers-on-derivatives/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>a 592 trillion market</category><category>bank opposition to derivatives regulation</category><category>derivatives</category><category>how they work</category><category>swaps</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Geithner eliminate speculation in financial derivatives?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/geithner_speaking_160.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />First of all, let's look at what hedging really is. Take, for example, a farmer who grows corn. He knows that his cost for growing corn is, say, $3.00 per bushel. But he doesn't know what price the price of bushel of corn will be come harvest time. He looks at the September futures contract for corn and sees that the price is $3.30 per bushel. <br /></p>
<p>To guarantee that he will get $3.30 at harvest time, he sells September corn contracts equal to his crop (each corn contract equals 5,000 bushels). When harvest time comes he delivers his corn to the appropriate delivery point designated by the Chicago Board of Trade exchange (CBOT) where the contracts are traded. It should be noted that if the price of the futures contract goes above $3.30 per bushel, the farmer may be called for margin money until he makes delivery, at which time his account is settled out.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should Geithner eliminate speculation in financial derivatives?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/">Should Geithner eliminate speculation in financial derivatives?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124723988236723897.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19095122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbot</category><category>derivatives</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>futures</category><category>geithner</category><category>hedging</category><category>inthenews</category><category>speculation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Watch out speculators! The CFTC wants to clip your wings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/watch-out-speculators-the-cftc-wants-to-clip-your-wings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/watch-out-speculators-the-cftc-wants-to-clip-your-wings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/watch-out-speculators-the-cftc-wants-to-clip-your-wings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstpic.jpg" />Who is going to crackdown on the speculators? The agency responsible for supervision of the commodities markets is the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC.)
<p> If you remember, last year the spike in oil prices to $147.00 per barrel was done through speculation in oil futures contracts. A futures contract gives the trader to right to bet on the prices of various commodities, on whether they will go up or down. Contracts usually last for three months, at which time the longs and the shorts are paired down to zero, leaving the speculators out of the final trading. However, the speculators simply move their positions to another forward contract, keeping their positions in place.</p>
<p>The rub has been on the concept of "position limits." <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/958cd848-6ae5-11de-861d-00144feabdc0.html">In most commodities the CFTC imposes a limit on the number of contracts that a single person or firm can hold. </a><strong><em><u>The real bone of contention is that the CFTC does not impose limits on oil or oil products contracts.</u></em></strong> That has been left up to the various exchanges.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/watch-out-speculators-the-cftc-wants-to-clip-your-wings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Watch out speculators! The CFTC wants to clip your wings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/watch-out-speculators-the-cftc-wants-to-clip-your-wings/">Watch out speculators! The CFTC wants to clip your wings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/958cd848-6ae5-11de-861d-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/watch-out-speculators-the-cftc-wants-to-clip-your-wings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19089120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/watch-out-speculators-the-cftc-wants-to-clip-your-wings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CFTC</category><category>derivative regulation</category><category>DerivativeRegulation</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil speculators</category><category>OilSpeculators</category><category>Tim Geithner</category><category>TimGeithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are financial stocks still a buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/are-financial-stocks-still-a-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/are-financial-stocks-still-a-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/are-financial-stocks-still-a-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="123" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/wall-street-subway-sign.jpg" alt="" />Are <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aeurAhN0GQwU">financial stocks a buy</a> now? Jeffrey Palma, a strategist for UBS says yes. He is recommending a modest "overweight" for this sector. He goes on to say that financials had the biggest gains among 10 industry groups in the MSCI World Index in the second quarter.</p>
<p>Let's be clear here. Mr. Palma is referring to the second quarter. The second quarter is done, finished. The real question is whether or not, going forward, the rally will continue.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/are-financial-stocks-still-a-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are financial stocks still a buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/are-financial-stocks-still-a-buy/">Are financial stocks still a buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/are-financial-stocks-still-a-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19083270/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/are-financial-stocks-still-a-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank stocks</category><category>derivatives</category><category>financial sector</category><category>Jeffrey Palma</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Treasury to impose the 5% rule on securitized securities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/treasury-to-impose-the-5-rule-on-securitized-securities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/treasury-to-impose-the-5-rule-on-securitized-securities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/treasury-to-impose-the-5-rule-on-securitized-securities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/geithner_speaking_160.jpg" />During the years leading up to the financial meltdown, banks primarily took mortgages and other loans and bundled them together. Rating agencies were called in to bless them -- we now know those ratings were bogus. No one bothered to ask what was in the packages and no one cared as long as the value kept rising. Then when the crash came, it was too late. Not knowing what was in the packages, investors could not sell because no one on the other side of the trade wanted to buy. The markets froze and the meltdown was on.</p>
<p>Now U.S. Treasury Geithner wants to change the rules and <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/badf55c4-59ee-11de-b687-00144feabdc0.html">force lenders to retain at least 5% of the loans they generate</a>. In a way, this is akin to a margin requirement for these securities. Obviously the banks oppose such a measure because it would tie up a portion of their capital.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/treasury-to-impose-the-5-rule-on-securitized-securities/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Treasury to impose the 5% rule on securitized securities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/treasury-to-impose-the-5-rule-on-securitized-securities/">Treasury to impose the 5% rule on securitized securities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/treasury-to-impose-the-5-rule-on-securitized-securities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19068680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/treasury-to-impose-the-5-rule-on-securitized-securities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>credit rating agencies</category><category>derivatives</category><category>Geithner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>margin requirement</category><category>mortgage-backed securities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPM's Jamie Dimon rambles on at the annual shareholder meeting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/jpms-jamie-dimon-rambles-on-at-the-annual-shareholder-meeting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/jpms-jamie-dimon-rambles-on-at-the-annual-shareholder-meeting/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/jpms-jamie-dimon-rambles-on-at-the-annual-shareholder-meeting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/annual-meetings/" rel="tag">Annual Meetings</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-jamie-dimon-200x267.jpg" alt="" />  <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase &amp; Company</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) held its annual shareholder meeting with Jamie Dimon, chief executive officer holding court.</p>
<p>Among his jabs against the Administration he <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9bdcd53a-44c6-11de-82d6-00144feabdc0.html">complained that the rules against hiring foreigners</a> was a "complete and utter disgrace." We might ask Mr. Dimon if he plans to hire another Chinese mathematician such as David X Li, whom JP Morgan Chase hired in 2000. Mr. Li developed a formula that created a single number from which traders bet billions of dollars in the past decade in derivatives which eventually brought the country to its knees when the housing bubble burst. This may help to explain why JP Morgan Chase has $87.7 trillion of derivatives "off the books." We might ask Mr Dimon to disclose the exact position in derivatives that he holds "off the books." Wouldn't that make fascinating reading?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/jpms-jamie-dimon-rambles-on-at-the-annual-shareholder-meeting/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPM's Jamie Dimon rambles on at the annual shareholder meeting</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/jpms-jamie-dimon-rambles-on-at-the-annual-shareholder-meeting/">JPM's Jamie Dimon rambles on at the annual shareholder meeting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 May 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9bdcd53a-44c6-11de-82d6-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/jpms-jamie-dimon-rambles-on-at-the-annual-shareholder-meeting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1551620/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/jpms-jamie-dimon-rambles-on-at-the-annual-shareholder-meeting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>derivatives</category><category>Jamie Dimon</category><category>JamieDimon</category><category>JP Morgans annual meeting</category><category>jpm</category><category>JpMorgansAnnualMeeting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What is the new banking 'big bang' protocol?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/what-is-the-new-banking-big-bang-protocol/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/what-is-the-new-banking-big-bang-protocol/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/what-is-the-new-banking-big-bang-protocol/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>Why is it that bankers will not come to grips with the fact the derivatives are destructive and have taken this economy down and turned it to ruin? <strong><u>Toxic assets are derivatives</u></strong> and we are throwing about $3 trillion of taxpayer money into this black hole. </p>
<p>Instead they are stubbornly holding on to derivatives and playing mickey mouse with a few changes. Listen to this one: -- <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a52ca5f2-2397-11de-996a-00144feabdc0.html">1400 banks and asset managers are adopting a new <strong><u>"big bang</u></strong>" protocol</a> to make it easier to know what will happen in the case of defaults. What in the world do they think they are doing -- creating a new universe? This just a sugar coating. Also, the US market will introduce a standardized pricing for CDS contracts which hitherto have been unregulated. The CDS market is not the main culprit. The main culprits are the CDOs and CLO's and the banks don't have a "big bang" for these derivatives.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/what-is-the-new-banking-big-bang-protocol/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What is the new banking 'big bang' protocol?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/what-is-the-new-banking-big-bang-protocol/">What is the new banking 'big bang' protocol?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a52ca5f2-2397-11de-996a-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/what-is-the-new-banking-big-bang-protocol/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1511265/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/what-is-the-new-banking-big-bang-protocol/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>big bang</category><category>BigBang</category><category>CDOs. Meredith Whitney</category><category>Cdos.MeredithWhitney</category><category>CLOs</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Just call it U.S. Government AIG]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/just-call-it-u-s-government-aig/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/just-call-it-u-s-government-aig/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/just-call-it-u-s-government-aig/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/aig-american-international-group-logo.jpg" />In the film version of Tennessee Williams' <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_on_a_Hot_Tin_Roof_(film)"><span style="font-style: italic;">'Cat On A Hot Tin Roof' (1958), </span></a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ActTaylorCatThinRoof.jpg">Maggie 'The Cat'</a> (Elizabeth Taylor), knows her husband <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ActTaylorCatThinRoof.jpg">Brick </a>(Paul Newman) is hiding something, but she can't figure out what it is.<br /> <br />Later, we learn that Brick is hiding the truth about his father, millionaire Big Daddy (Burl Ives), and he slowly gathers the courage to end the mendacity that has permeated their lives. <br /><br />At some point the nation will, likewise, end the mendacity about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) and announce the full, probable cost of the orderly stabilization of AIG. For economic conservatives, market absolutists, most Republicans, and others who oppose government intervention, the above would be bad news, but at this juncture, it appears to be unavoidable.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/just-call-it-u-s-government-aig/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Just call it U.S. Government AIG</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/just-call-it-u-s-government-aig/">Just call it U.S. Government AIG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/just-call-it-u-s-government-aig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1480923/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/just-call-it-u-s-government-aig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>counterparties</category><category>counterparty</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>credit default swaps</category><category>derivatives</category><category>featured</category><category>financial system</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Buffett suffers big losses at Berkshire Hathaway]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/buffet-suffers-big-losses-at-berkshire-hathaway/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/buffet-suffers-big-losses-at-berkshire-hathaway/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/buffet-suffers-big-losses-at-berkshire-hathaway/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="165" border="1" align="right" width="220" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/buffettpic.jpg" alt="" />Like so many others, you probably wanted to be a fly on the wall when Warren Buffet gave his fourth-quarter report to shareholders of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>). Well, here's the bad news: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE51R0US20090228?sp=true">Net profit fell 96%, the fifth quarterly straight decline</a> and Berkshire's net worth dropped a whopping $10.9 billion in the final three months of 2008.</p>
<p>Omaha-based Berkshire Hathaway is a diversified company that invests in insurer Geico Corp. and such things as carpeting, ice cream, paint, and real estate services. But to quote Mr. Buffet: "the economy will be in shambles throughout 2009."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/buffet-suffers-big-losses-at-berkshire-hathaway/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Buffett suffers big losses at Berkshire Hathaway</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/buffet-suffers-big-losses-at-berkshire-hathaway/">Buffett suffers big losses at Berkshire Hathaway</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/buffet-suffers-big-losses-at-berkshire-hathaway/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1474612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/buffet-suffers-big-losses-at-berkshire-hathaway/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>Berkshire Hathaways earnings report</category><category>derivatives</category><category>earnings</category><category>Geico</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Peterson drafts legislation to end speculation in derivatives ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/peterson-drafts-legislation-to-end-speculation-in-derivatives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/peterson-drafts-legislation-to-end-speculation-in-derivatives/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/peterson-drafts-legislation-to-end-speculation-in-derivatives/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/collinpeterson.jpg" alt="" />Originally a CDS (credit default swap) was a protection against the default of an underlying bond, usually a mortgage. It was a fine idea. <br /></p>
<p>But now enter the speculators who developed a scheme to trade these CDS's independent of the underlying mortgage. This has developed into a <strong><u>$30,000 billion dollar trading market.</u></strong> It is this market that is destroying world economies like they are twigs snapped in the wind.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/peterson-drafts-legislation-to-end-speculation-in-derivatives/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Peterson drafts legislation to end speculation in derivatives </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/peterson-drafts-legislation-to-end-speculation-in-derivatives/">Peterson drafts legislation to end speculation in derivatives </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/61c23b40-ee42-11dd-b791-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/peterson-drafts-legislation-to-end-speculation-in-derivatives/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1447500/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/peterson-drafts-legislation-to-end-speculation-in-derivatives/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CDSs</category><category>Collin Peterson</category><category>CollinPeterson</category><category>Congressional draft</category><category>CongressionalDraft</category><category>derivatives</category><category>limited use</category><category>LimitedUse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[In 2008 they all fell down. Who are they?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/in-2008-they-all-fell-down-who-are-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/in-2008-they-all-fell-down-who-are-they/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/in-2008-they-all-fell-down-who-are-they/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/wallstreets.jpg"  alt="" />Here is <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b2247e62-d02f-11dd-ae00-000077b07658.html">a roster of some of the fallen ones.</a></p>
<p><strong><u>Jimmy Cayne </u></strong>Former CEO Bear Stearns - latest compensation $32.1 million. He led Bear Stearns for 15 years. He resigned last January. Bear Stearns was acquired by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"> JPM</a>) for $10.00 a share. He and his wife purchased two luxury apartments at the Plaza.</p>
<p><strong><u>Richard Fuld </u></strong>Former CEO Lehman Brothers - Latest compensation $34.4 million. Subpoenaed by federal investigators to determine if he misled investors at Lehman. Executives at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys">Barclays Capital</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys">BCS</a>) bought Lehman's US assets.</p>
<p><strong><u>Kerry Killinger </u></strong>Former CEO WaMu - latest compensation $4.5 million. He became CEO in 1990 and built WaMU into one of the largest US mortgage writers. He offered sub prime mortgages which led to WaMU's rapid growth. He was ousted in September when WaMU was sold to JPMorgan.</p>
<strong><u>Angelo Mozilo </u></strong>Former CEO Countrywide - latest compensation $132 million. He helped build Countrywide into one of the country's largest lenders. A host of class action lawsuits have been filed against Countrywide, which is under investigation by the SEC. Countrywide was sold to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) in January.
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/in-2008-they-all-fell-down-who-are-they/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>In 2008 they all fell down. Who are they?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/in-2008-they-all-fell-down-who-are-they/">In 2008 they all fell down. Who are they?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b2247e62-d02f-11dd-ae00-000077b07658.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/in-2008-they-all-fell-down-who-are-they/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1411649/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/in-2008-they-all-fell-down-who-are-they/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>bac</category><category>banks</category><category>CEOs</category><category>derivatives</category><category>FEATURED</category><category>fnm</category><category>fre</category><category>jpm</category><category>kerry killinger</category><category>KerryKillinger</category><category>lenders</category><category>mer</category><category>recklessness</category><category>richard fuld</category><category>RichardFuld</category><category>WAMU</category><category>wb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Buffett can't be right every time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/08/buffett-cant-be-right-every-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/08/buffett-cant-be-right-every-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/08/buffett-cant-be-right-every-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a></p><p><img height="179" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/warren-buffett.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) has a very ordinary quarter, but by founder Warren Buffett's standards it was awful. The company's insurance operations were hurt by hurricane claims. The other factor that damaged earnings was losses on derivatives. Buffett is supposed to think derivatives are for idiots, so it is not clear how that part happened.</p>
<p>Berkshire's net income fell to $1.06 billion, or $682 per Class A share, from $4.55 billion, or $2,942, in the period a year ago. Operating profit fell 18% to $2.07 billion, or $1,335 per share, from $2.56 billion, or $1,655. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE4A67LK20081107">According to</a> Reuters<em>, "</em>It fell short of analysts' average expectation for $1,429 per share, according to Reuters Estimates."</p>
<p>No one in his right mind would go through <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000095015008000030/v50391e10vq.htm">Buffett's 10-Q</a>. It is as thick as the New York City phone book. The company still has an astonishing $50 billion on its balance sheet, which means Berkshire has a great deal of capital to buy companies it thinks are undervalued during the recession, a favorite Buffett habit.</p>
<p>For anyone who cares, the tiny Berkshire group that controls private jet company NetJets, Dairy Queen, public relations operation BusinessWire, and the Buffalo News did just fine.</p>
<p>How Buffett does it is anyone's guess. Who makes sure BusinessWire is doing OK?</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/08/buffett-cant-be-right-every-time/">Buffett can't be right every time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/08/buffett-cant-be-right-every-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1366070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/08/buffett-cant-be-right-every-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BRK-A</category><category>BusinessWire</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's David Brooks: It's the start of a different kind of economic 'cycle' ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/nyts-david-brooks-its-the-start-of-a-different-kind-of-econom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/nyts-david-brooks-its-the-start-of-a-different-kind-of-econom/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/nyts-david-brooks-its-the-start-of-a-different-kind-of-econom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) Columnist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/26/opinion/26brooks.html?em">David Brooks</a> draws attention to a U.S. economic discussion and reality that's been all-but-sidelined in the past three decades, particularly among younger investors and others who believe that history began in 1981. Namely, that there's been a distinct cyclicality to the nation's economic / public policy history. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Is a new progressive era ahead?</span><br /><br />That may come as a surprise to market absolutists and others who see economic history and their view of economic progress as a straight line towards privatization. In fact, periods of economic conservatism and liberalism -- the latter also known as progressive reform -- have cycled for much of the nation's history. <br /><br />For Brooks, those economic blinders help explain both the market absolutists' befuddlement at the financial crisis around them and their inability to adapt to the electoral demands brought on by the crisis. Market absolutists are in a straightjacket of a party that is ailing and part of a conservatism that is behind the times, he says. <br /><br />On the cycle's timing, economist David H. Wang argues that the old era ends and the new era begins not when social pressures build from the bottom-up, but when institutions -- like investment banks, mortgage lenders and credit default swap issuers -- fail from the top-down.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/nyts-david-brooks-its-the-start-of-a-different-kind-of-econom/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's David Brooks: It's the start of a different kind of economic 'cycle' </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/nyts-david-brooks-its-the-start-of-a-different-kind-of-econom/">NYT's David Brooks: It's the start of a different kind of economic 'cycle' </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/nyts-david-brooks-its-the-start-of-a-different-kind-of-econom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1363480/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/nyts-david-brooks-its-the-start-of-a-different-kind-of-econom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>110508</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit market</category><category>David Brooks</category><category>Democrats</category><category>derivatives</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>Keynesians</category><category>monetarists</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Republicans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Volcker: U.S. needs more civil engineers and fewer financial engineers ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/volcker-u-s-needs-more-civil-engineers-and-fewer-financial-eng/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/volcker-u-s-needs-more-civil-engineers-and-fewer-financial-eng/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/volcker-u-s-needs-more-civil-engineers-and-fewer-financial-eng/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>Every once in while during a crisis or history-altering event, you run across a quote or an observation that sort of summarizes events on the ground, in a nutshell. Former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman <a href="http://www.charlierose.com/guests/paul-volcker">Paul Volcker articulated</a> one such observation during a recent chat he had with <a href="http://www.charlierose.com/guests/paul-volcker">PBS's Charlie Rose</a>. <br /><br />"It seems to me what our nation needs is more civil engineers and electrical engineers and fewer financial engineers," <a href="http://www.charlierose.com/guests/paul-volcker">Volcker said</a>.<br /><br /><strong>U.S.: a decade of descent</strong><br /><br />And there you have it -- the United States' decade of descent, in a nutshell. Volcker's observation speaks volumes about where the United States economy -- and the nation, at large, for that matter -- is today. <br /><br />For reasons that historians will undoubtedly debate for decades (globalization, automation, flawed public policies, inadequate regulations, overconsumption, the availability of foreign capital, greed) the United States embarked on a financing boom -- creating an increasing array of creative and untenable mortgage types, accompanied by an equally problematic set of mortgage backed securities. It generated an unsustainable housing bubble, which ended as all bubbles do -- badly -- triggering the global financial crisis. <br /><br />And yet, all the while, as Volcker observed, public investment in infrastructure -- the physical backbone of the economy, of the nation, really -- declined. That infrastructure is now in a state of disrepair. The nation's schools, hospitals, roads/bridges/mass transit systems/air travel system and even our electric grid are inadequate to meet the nation's current requirements, let alone the requirements of an expanding, vibrant, dynamic, twenty-first century economy.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/volcker-u-s-needs-more-civil-engineers-and-fewer-financial-eng/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Volcker: U.S. needs more civil engineers and fewer financial engineers </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/volcker-u-s-needs-more-civil-engineers-and-fewer-financial-eng/">Volcker: U.S. needs more civil engineers and fewer financial engineers </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/volcker-u-s-needs-more-civil-engineers-and-fewer-financial-eng/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1352277/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/volcker-u-s-needs-more-civil-engineers-and-fewer-financial-eng/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Charlie Show</category><category>civil engineering</category><category>civil engineers</category><category>credit default swaps</category><category>derivatives</category><category>engineering</category><category>gdp</category><category>housing bubble</category><category>HousingBubble</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>Paul Volcker</category><category>PBS</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>Volcker</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:56:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
