<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks quashes the competition? Not in my neighborhood]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/starbucks-quashes-the-competition-not-in-my-neighborhood/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/starbucks-quashes-the-competition-not-in-my-neighborhood/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/starbucks-quashes-the-competition-not-in-my-neighborhood/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/starbucks_wideangle.jpg" alt="the starbucks in my neighborhood" />I'm an avid follower of all the news on Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX). So when I saw the article in today's USA Today about Penny Stafford's lawsuit against Starbucks claiming that the company is engaging in anti-competitive practices, I yawned. But it wasn't a happy yawn.<br /><br />I've heard of Penny Stafford and her lawsuit before. And I'm sure she has validity to her complaints -- while the facts of the case are still she said/they said, the concept that Starbucks pays over-market rates for prime real estate, and asks for exclusives in some buildings, is pretty much agreed-upon.<br /><br />But her claim that Starbucks drives other stores out of business due to market saturation? It's not happening in my neighborhood, even though, in a one-mile radius from my house in the past four years, the market has increased from one chain coffee store (a Coffee People, owned by Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (NASDAQ:DDRX) and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/18/starbucks-buys-coffee-people-stores-hippies-mourn/">recently bought by Starbucks</a>) to two Starbucks and six independent coffee shops. The coffee shops succeed in direct relation to the quality of their products and whether or not the owners manage to create a welcoming, comfortable atmosphere -- the success has nothing to do with proximity to Starbucks or quality of the real estate. Although a neighborhood of 8,000 or so people has been veritably flooded with coffee, all but one of the stores are succeeding (and the failure was clear to me from the moment I peered through the window to see the cafeteria-quality furniture the owner had selected).<br /><br />And I don't think my neighborhood is unusual, or even one of a handful of anecdotal successes. Whatever you think of Starbucks, the company is just <span style="font-weight: bold;">good for independent coffee shops</span>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/starbucks-quashes-the-competition-not-in-my-neighborhood/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks quashes the competition? Not in my neighborhood</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/starbucks-quashes-the-competition-not-in-my-neighborhood/">Starbucks quashes the competition? Not in my neighborhood</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/starbucks-quashes-the-competition-not-in-my-neighborhood/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/722410/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/starbucks-quashes-the-competition-not-in-my-neighborhood/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>coffee people</category><category>CoffeePeople</category><category>diedrich</category><category>monopolistic</category><category>monopoly</category><category>penny stafford</category><category>PennyStafford</category><category>sbux</category><category>stafford</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:38:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
