<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Weight Watchers sees lighter sales in Q3]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p>Weight Watchers (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/weight-watchers-international-inc/wtw/nys">WTW</a>), the well-known provider of solutions to those who want to shed a few extra pounds, issued Q3 numbers on Tuesday. While losing inches is always a popular activity, that doesn't mean that the company will always see growth.</p>
<p>According to the corporate <a href="http://www.weightwatchersinternational.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130178&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1353843&amp;highlight=">press release</a>, Weight Watchers saw an 8% decline in net sales. Earnings per share came in at 68 cents on a diluted basis. That was only a penny better than the year prior. Management is certainly making the most of its revenues by keeping costs and expenses down, but it is obviously disappointing to shareholders when income expansion is dependent on belt-tightening. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Weight Watchers sees lighter sales in Q3</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/">Weight Watchers sees lighter sales in Q3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.weightwatchersinternational.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130178&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1353843&amp;highlight=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSBNG46599920091110?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.weightwatchersinternational.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130178&amp;p=irol-dividends>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19233003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/weight-watchers-sees-lighter-sales-in-q3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>weight management</category><category>weight watchers</category><category>WTW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Weight loss goes wholesale -- buy NutriSystem (NTRI)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/weight-loss-goes-wholesale-buy-nutrisystem-ntri/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/weight-loss-goes-wholesale-buy-nutrisystem-ntri/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/weight-loss-goes-wholesale-buy-nutrisystem-ntri/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/measuring-waist.jpg" alt="" />Most of the myths regarding market moves are not worth the paper they're printed on. That said, one old wives' tale worth noting, and even following, is the <a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/stocks/how_to/articles/Stock-Trading-Put-the-Calendar-On-Your-Side-with-t-79683.cfm">January effect</a>. </p>
<p>For whatever reason, small-cap stocks do indeed outperform their larger brethren during the month of January.</p>
<p>I recently provided a list of <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/gallery/5-stocks-for-the-january-effect.html">5 Stocks for the January Effect</a>. On the list was a former high-flyer that lost enough market value to now qualify as a small-cap stock -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nutri-sys-inc-new/ntri/nas">NutriSystem</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nutri-sys-inc-new/ntri/nas">NTRI</a>).</p>
<p>NutriSystem captured the investor imagination with its unique solution to weight loss and weight management. The company's home delivery of prepackaged meals promised ease of use with results.</p>
<p>Given the huge audience for such a solution, NTRI presented investors with a <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/gallery/top-10-stocks-for-2009.html">great growth opportunity</a>. Even though it took a few years to catch on, investors eventually got the idea.</p>
<p>NutriSystem became a darling of the <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/take-advantage-of-madoff.html">momentum crowd</a> in 2005. In the span of a year and a half, the stock moved from the single digits to above $80 per share. Coinciding with a big marketing program, revenue and investors seemed to grow in tandem.</p>
<p>That's all well and good, but at some point valuation does matter. That time usually comes when growth or results fail to meet elevated expectations. For NTRI, that started to happen in mid-2007.</p>
<p>In no time flat the stock lost more than half its value as the momentum crowd fled. The stock has been trading on a flat line around $15 per share for most of 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/weight-loss-goes-wholesale-buy-nutrisystem-ntri/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Weight loss goes wholesale -- buy NutriSystem (NTRI)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/weight-loss-goes-wholesale-buy-nutrisystem-ntri/">Weight loss goes wholesale -- buy NutriSystem (NTRI)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/weight-loss-goes-wholesale-buy-nutrisystem-ntri/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1420216/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/weight-loss-goes-wholesale-buy-nutrisystem-ntri/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>dieting</category><category>diets</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>january effect</category><category>JanuaryEffect</category><category>ntri</category><category>nutrisystem</category><category>small cap stocks</category><category>small caps</category><category>SmallCaps</category><category>SmallCapStocks</category><category>weight loss</category><category>WeightLoss</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's CEO whines about menu disclosure laws]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/mcdonalds-ceo-whines-about-menu-disclosure-laws/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/mcdonalds-ceo-whines-about-menu-disclosure-laws/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/mcdonalds-ceo-whines-about-menu-disclosure-laws/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mcdonalds.jpg"  alt="" />McDonald's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) chief executive cry baby Jim Skinner <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-mcdonaldsmay19,0,3326375.story">told attendees</a> at the National Restaurant Association's annual convention that the increasing popularity of state regulations requiring fast food chains to disclose calories counts are "redundant and flawed" and referred to the activists pushing for these measures as "CAVE people - Citizens Against Virtually Everything."<br /><br />With all due respect to Mr. Skinner, he couldn't be more wrong or disingenuous.<br /><br />Posting calorie counts on menus will give consumers greater and more convenient to nutritional information than they've ever had before. The reason McDonald's opposes these laws is that they know that if people knew what they were eating, many would eat less and save some of the money for the respirator.<br /><br />The fact that Mr. Skinner is so worried about these laws that cities including New York have adopted demonstrates that they aren't redundant. If they were, there would be nothing to worry about!<br /><br />It's a shame when the CEO of one of America's largest companies takes a stand against providing consumers with more information in a more convenient format.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/mcdonalds-ceo-whines-about-menu-disclosure-laws/">McDonald's CEO whines about menu disclosure laws</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 May 2008 09:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-mcdonaldsmay19,0,3326375.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/mcdonalds-ceo-whines-about-menu-disclosure-laws/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1199263/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/mcdonalds-ceo-whines-about-menu-disclosure-laws/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jim skinner</category><category>JimSkinner</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>nutrition</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 09:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The week in preview: Misery loves these companies (WFMI, SIRI, BBI and more)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/11/week-in-preview-may-12-16-misery-loves-these-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/11/week-in-preview-may-12-16-misery-loves-these-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/11/week-in-preview-may-12-16-misery-loves-these-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfmi/" rel="tag">Whole Foods Market (WFMI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/imb/" rel="tag">IndyMac Bancorp (IMB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/zolt/" rel="tag">Zoltek Co (ZOLT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/miserypicture.jpg" alt="" />The earnings party of last week was full of fun and frolic. For the most part, if you followed my list of recommendations, you would have had your very own "Fiesta de Finance." (<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/the-week-in-preview-optimism-reigns-but-will-earnings-news-pr/">See Week in Preview - May 5</a>)<br /><br />The earnings season is still in full swing and should provide a great deal of action for the companies that will be reporting. But these companies will have to fight through a few new economic barriers. With oil pushing past historic levels and questions beginning to surface concerning the ability of the investor to continue to support a market that has so many headwinds, the mood is likely to shift moving forward. It is time for discipline, short and simple. Now, more than ever investors need a plan. I cover this strategy in my book, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0978708377/investmentadvi09">The Disciplined Investor.</a><br /><br />In the last installment of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/the-week-in-preview-optimism-reigns-but-will-earnings-news-pr/">The Week in Preview</a>, I was looking for party opportunities in honor of Cinco de Mayo. This week, <strong>Misery</strong> is the theme. That is the only word that comes to mind with oil at a level that you would have never expected, a massive and unrelenting credit and housing crisis and a banking system that is defunct. <br /><br /><strong>Monday - May 12</strong><br /><br />We start the week with a report from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/indymac-bancorp-inc/imb/nys">IndyMac Bancorp </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/indymac-bancorp-inc/imb/nys">IMB</a>). This bank is smack in the middle of the housing problem. It is primarily a lending company that facilitates loans for single-family homes. It's also involved in the origination and trading of mortgages. How does that sound to you as an investment? Shares have slid from $23 in October 2007 to an unbelievable level of $3.50 recently. Ouch... If you are a shareholder still holding on with hope and a prayer for something...anything, keep on dreaming. The good news is that the stock is sporting a yield of 29%. But, if you think that yield is going to be maintained, I have a bridge for sale. Estimates are for a loss of $1.92 per share for the quarter.<br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pacific-ethanol-inc-commonstock/peix/nas"><br /></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/11/week-in-preview-may-12-16-misery-loves-these-companies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The week in preview: Misery loves these companies (WFMI, SIRI, BBI and more)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/11/week-in-preview-may-12-16-misery-loves-these-companies/">The week in preview: Misery loves these companies (WFMI, SIRI, BBI and more)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 May 2008 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/11/week-in-preview-may-12-16-misery-loves-these-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1190613/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/11/week-in-preview-may-12-16-misery-loves-these-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>BBI</category><category>cc</category><category>DIET</category><category>FRE</category><category>GIVN</category><category>IMB</category><category>NFLX</category><category>PEIX</category><category>RUBO</category><category>SIRI</category><category>SLRY</category><category>WFMI</category><category>XMSR</category><category>ZOLT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Horowitz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eDiets.com: Online assistance for finding that slimmer you]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/ediets-com-online-assistance-in-finding-that-slimmer-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/ediets-com-online-assistance-in-finding-that-slimmer-you/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/ediets-com-online-assistance-in-finding-that-slimmer-you/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><a href="http://www.stockwinners.com"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/stockwinners.jpg" /></a>Feeling a little heavy after the holidays? Wondering where to find help honoring that New Year's resolution to lose some weight, without attending "public" sessions? Go online, of course! There is an Web outfit in Fort Lauderdale that is helping nearly 120,000 dieters already. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ediets-com-inc/diet/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">eDiets.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ediets-com-inc/diet/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">DIET</a>) develops and markets Internet-based diet and fitness programs in North America and Europe. It offers subscribers diet plans according to the individual's weight goals and includes related shopping lists and recipes. It also provides meal delivery service, corporate wellness programs and telephone/online support. The company has partnerships with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bristol-myers-squibb-company/bmy/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Bristol-Myers Squibb</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bristol-myers-squibb-company/bmy/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BMY</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) AOL.</p>
<p>DIET shares are up 40% over the past ten weeks, sparked by such issues as upside FY08 revenue guidance, favorable<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/diet01072008.gif" /> analyst remarks, a new CEO and an improved technology platform. The news has the stock cycling through a positive trading channel. The price is currently near the base of that channel, where oversold Momentum and MACD technical parameters suggest the potential for a rise back toward the top. Correspondence of the issue's 30-day moving average to the base of the channel backs the rebound notion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/ediets-com-online-assistance-in-finding-that-slimmer-you/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eDiets.com: Online assistance for finding that slimmer you</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/ediets-com-online-assistance-in-finding-that-slimmer-you/">eDiets.com: Online assistance for finding that slimmer you</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/ediets-com-online-assistance-in-finding-that-slimmer-you/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1079692/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/ediets-com-online-assistance-in-finding-that-slimmer-you/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIET</category><category>eDiets.com</category><category>fundamental analysis</category><category>FundamentalAnalysis</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>trading channel</category><category>TradingChannel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Schutts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NutriSystem profits from holiday weight loss]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/trying-to-shed-holiday-pounds-nutrisystems-is-for-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/trying-to-shed-holiday-pounds-nutrisystems-is-for-you/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/trying-to-shed-holiday-pounds-nutrisystems-is-for-you/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>With all the eating that took place over the last few weeks, it's time to try and shed those unwanted pounds. For those looking to invest based on this inevitable trend, take a look at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nutri-sys-inc-new/ntri/nas">NutriSystem</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nutri-sys-inc-new/ntri/nas">NTRI</a>). The company offers a weight-loss program based on portion-controlled, lower Glycemic Index prepared meals. The <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/blog/">stock</a> has certainly shed some girth over the last year, getting trimmed by over 65%.</p>
<p>While you can let me know if you think their meals are tasty or not, at these levels the stocks looks really attractive, sort of like the piece of hot chocolate cake that is staring me in the eyes as I write this! The stock is trading at a PE of just 8.08 and a PEG of 0.44. Their remains a large <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/">short-interest</a> on the stock, which is keeping the pressure on, but if the company has some good news, the shorts will have to cover and this could take off like a rocket. At $25 a share, this looks like their will be plenty of upside to the stock price.</p>
<p><em><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">IsraelNewsletter.com</font></em></a><em>. Disclosure: Writer has no position long or short in any stock mentioned as of 1/3/08.</em></em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/trying-to-shed-holiday-pounds-nutrisystems-is-for-you/">NutriSystem profits from holiday weight loss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/trying-to-shed-holiday-pounds-nutrisystems-is-for-you/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1076106/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/trying-to-shed-holiday-pounds-nutrisystems-is-for-you/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>NTRI</category><category>NutriSystem</category><category>weight loss</category><category>WeightLoss</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress may ban junk food from schools -- what took so long?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/congress-may-ban-junk-food-from-schools-what-took-so-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/congress-may-ban-junk-food-from-schools-what-took-so-long/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/congress-may-ban-junk-food-from-schools-what-took-so-long/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Twinkies are junk food. "  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/twinkies.jpg" />As news of the nationwide obesity epidemic among children sweeps through the media, it's hard to fathom that one of major purveyors of crap food are the schools: Yes, those places we send children so they can be safe and grow up to strong, intelligent members of society.<br /><br />Mercifully, Congress is close to dealing with the issue. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/us/02school.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1196539768-yjhd6g8Y4f/izOLCAYYNSQ&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;oref=slogin">According</a> to the <em>New York Times</em>, "Federal lawmakers are considering the broadest effort ever to limit what children eat: a national ban on selling candy, sugary soda and salty, fatty food in school snack bars, vending machines and a la carte cafeteria lines ...Several lawmakers and advocates for changes in school food believe that an amendment to the $286 billion farm bill is the best chance to get control of the mountain of high-calorie snacks and sodas available to schoolchildren. Even if the farm bill does not pass, Mr. Harkin and Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, a sponsor of the amendment, vow to keep reintroducing it in other forms until it sticks."<br /><br />Signing this bill would send the right message. It's important for schools to raise money to fund programs, but exploiting vulnerable members of society and selling them something that could have a very negative impact on their lives is not the right way to do that. Government should not fund programs, however worthy, that sell unhealthy stuff to people.<br /><br />The next step is for some independent-minded, courageous politicians (yeah, I know) to take on the lottery, which is similar to junk food in schools, in that they raise money by selling unhealthy products to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/the-lottery-promoter-who-is-destroying-the-lives-of-working-amer/">society's most vulnerable</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/congress-may-ban-junk-food-from-schools-what-took-so-long/">Congress may ban junk food from schools -- what took so long?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/us/02school.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1196539768-yjhd6g8Y4f/izOLCAYYNSQ&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/congress-may-ban-junk-food-from-schools-what-took-so-long/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1053180/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/congress-may-ban-junk-food-from-schools-what-took-so-long/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Children</category><category>Diet</category><category>Obesity</category><category>Schools</category><category>Weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why restaurants should be required to provide nutritional information]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/why-restaurants-should-be-required-to-provide-nutritional-inform/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/why-restaurants-should-be-required-to-provide-nutritional-inform/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/why-restaurants-should-be-required-to-provide-nutritional-inform/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p>Restaurateurs are <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2007/09/10/daily19.html">cheering</a> a New York court's <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSN1144309320070911">decision</a> striking down a menu law implemented by the New York Board of Health. The law required fast-food restaurants to disclose on their menus how many calories were in their meals.<br /><br />The Department of Health says it is disappointed its law was overturned on a "technicality", and that it will continue to explore ways to make it easier for the consumer to eat healthy. If you've ever tried to get nutritional information in a fast-food restaurant you know how hard it can be. If you have the foresight, you can get it quickly online, but I've been in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">McDonald's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MCD</a>) locations where I was told they did not have the information available on site. Even if they do, it can be a hassle, and displaying it on the menu is the logical way to make sure consumers have convenient access to the information they need to make a decision.<br /><br />The idea of New York's law was very similar to the way our securities laws are in this country: It was based on clear and compulsory disclosure, rather than subjective requirements. A public company can have O.J. Simpson and Jose Canseco as its CEO and CFO, as long as it discloses the baggage they bring. Similarly, McDonald's should be allowed to serve whatever it wants -- but consumers should be warned that they may find themselves carrying extra baggage if they order the wrong item.<br /><br />It's a shame that fast-food chains want to keep their customers in the dark about nutrition, and it's unfortunate that the court has stymied the Department of Health's efforts to provide the consumer with greater information.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/why-restaurants-should-be-required-to-provide-nutritional-inform/">Why restaurants should be required to provide nutritional information</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2007/09/10/daily19.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/why-restaurants-should-be-required-to-provide-nutritional-inform/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/988104/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/why-restaurants-should-be-required-to-provide-nutritional-inform/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>health</category><category>law</category><category>obesity</category><category>restaurants</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[School cafeterias get healthy: How much is too much?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/07/school-cafeterias-get-healthy-how-much-is-too-much/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/07/school-cafeterias-get-healthy-how-much-is-too-much/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/07/school-cafeterias-get-healthy-how-much-is-too-much/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><p>School cafeterias are getting healthier and, amazingly, some <em>parents</em> are complaining about that.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/05/business/05junkfood.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">According</a> to <em>The New York Times</em>, they're upset that some school districts aren't letting kids bring in cupcakes to celebrate birthdays. And without in-school sales of baked goods, however shall parent-teacher associations raise money?</p>
<p>Texas parents even lobbied for a "safe cupcake amendment" (no joke) to be added to the state's school nutrition policy, to ensure that students could bring in the tasty treats for birthday parties. Their efforts were successful.</p>
<p>Given the burgeoning obesity epidemic, we should be applauding various school districts for removing deep fryers from their kitchens, using low-fat products, and switching from soda to water.</p>
<p>Are parents right to be complaining about the ban on cupcakes? I don't think so.</p>
<p>The idea of celebrating accomplishments/milestones with unhealthy foods -- and drowning sorrows with soda -- is one of the things that has led to the current crisis (Yes, 60% of America being overweight is a crisis). Instead of cupcakes for birthdays, how about walks in the woods or extra-recess time to play kickball or capture the flag? It might sound corny, but I think a lot of kids would find that more fun. And their waistlines would thank them.</p>
<p>And if PTO's can't raise money without selling junkfood, then they have a serious creativity deficit.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/07/school-cafeterias-get-healthy-how-much-is-too-much/">School cafeterias get healthy: How much is too much?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/05/business/05junkfood.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/07/school-cafeterias-get-healthy-how-much-is-too-much/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/981350/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/07/school-cafeterias-get-healthy-how-much-is-too-much/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cafeteria</category><category>Diet</category><category>Education</category><category>Health</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[High school vending machines getting more eclectic]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/high-school-vending-machines-getting-more-eclectic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/high-school-vending-machines-getting-more-eclectic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/high-school-vending-machines-getting-more-eclectic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="195" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/diet-coke.jpg" />While the sweetest of soft drinks may now be off limits in high-school vending machines, some hip new options may soon be available to the nation's students. <br /><br /> In May 2006, the beverage industry voluntarily agreed to stop selling full-calorie sodas in schools. The agreement stated that companies could sell milk, water, diet sodas, sports drinks, and unsweetened and low-calorie juices. <br /><br />The industry has now <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/drink-makers-expand-offerings-in-schools/20070820175409990002">expanded this list</a> to include additional beverages meeting the criterion of fewer than 100 calories per 12 ounces. Certain flavored iced teas and vitamin-flavored waters fit the bill. Most varieties of Glaceau VitaminWater, a recent acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">Coca-Cola</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>), have 75 calories or less. The same is true for the various flavors of SoBe LifeWater, owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PepsiCo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PEP</a>).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/high-school-vending-machines-getting-more-eclectic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>High school vending machines getting more eclectic</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/high-school-vending-machines-getting-more-eclectic/">High school vending machines getting more eclectic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/drink-makers-expand-offerings-in-schools/20070820175409990002>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/high-school-vending-machines-getting-more-eclectic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/970617/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/high-school-vending-machines-getting-more-eclectic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beverages</category><category>Coke</category><category>Diet</category><category>Glaceau</category><category>High School</category><category>HighSchool</category><category>KO</category><category>LifeWater</category><category>PEP</category><category>Pepsi</category><category>SoBe</category><category>soft drinks</category><category>SoftDrinks</category><category>VitaminWater</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's burgers taste better than plain paper: The power of advertising]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/mcdonalds-burgers-taste-better-than-plain-paper-the-power-of-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/mcdonalds-burgers-taste-better-than-plain-paper-the-power-of-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/mcdonalds-burgers-taste-better-than-plain-paper-the-power-of-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/mcd_burger_drink.jpg" alt="" />A survey in The Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine showed that children thought the food which comes in a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) wrapper tastes better than food in a plain wrapper. That is, of course, if there is actually a burger in both.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/health/nutrition/14nugg.html?ref=business">According to</a> <em>The New York Times</em> "almost 77 percent, for example, thought that McDonald's french fries served in a McDonald's bag tasted better, compared with 13 percent who liked the fries in a plain white bag." The same held true with carrots. </p>
<p>Given that amount of fatty food that the chain serves and the problems with child obesity, the medical community, as one might expect, went wild. One of the doctors involved in the survey commented: "The best response the fast-food industry could make to this information is to alter their menus to include a majority of healthful foods instead of encouraging consumption of high-fat, high-calorie foods."</p>
<p>McDonald's executives took a different view. The company said that it has been selling branded apples, milk, and other healthy food for some time.</p>
<p>McDonald's is being a bit cute here. Most of the food it sells is high in fat and if children were given a daily diet of the stuff they would most likely become corpulent withing a few months. The fast food chain could hardly be called a shining light for the health food industry.</p>
<p>But, it is not the chain's job to make sure that we are healthy. It is just their job to feed us.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/mcdonalds-burgers-taste-better-than-plain-paper-the-power-of-a/">McDonald's burgers taste better than plain paper: The power of advertising</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/health/nutrition/14nugg.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/mcdonalds-burgers-taste-better-than-plain-paper-the-power-of-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/964702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/mcdonalds-burgers-taste-better-than-plain-paper-the-power-of-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Diet</category><category>featured</category><category>Health</category><category>marketing</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonald's</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vegetarianism: Good for your heart ... and your wallet!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/29/vegetarianism-good-for-your-heart-and-your-wallet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/29/vegetarianism-good-for-your-heart-and-your-wallet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/29/vegetarianism-good-for-your-heart-and-your-wallet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img height="180" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/fruits_and_vegetables2.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" />An interesting piece on MSN Money highlights a little-touted <a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SavingandDebt/SaveMoney/GoVegetarianToSaveMoney.aspx">benefit of vegetarianism</a>, for all of cynical cheapskates out there. I probably wouldn't go vegetarian because I feel sorry for the furry woodland creatures, and I certainly won't do it for my health. Arteries? I mean come on. But they've finally found something that might just convert this steak-guzzling carnivore: Being a vegetarian can save you money. </p>
<p>Aside from the benefits of having good health later in life, check this out:</p>
<p><em>If you drop red meat, poultry, and fish from your diet, you'll find plant proteins cheaper than the equivalent amount of animal protein ... Contrast that with dried beans and lentils at less than $1 a pound and rice well below $1 per pound ... Even tofu, the chicken of the vegetarian world, is usually well under $2 a pound.</em></p>
<p>All right, I'm sold! Note to PETA: Instead of sending me mailings full of propaganda about animal cruelty, send me a detailed summary of how much money I can save each year by being a vegetarian. The number one thing marketing experts say you have to tell the the customer is: "What's in it for me?"</p>
<p>I would be willing to bet that a national ad campaign touting the economic benefits of a meat-free diet would convert a lot of cynics like me.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/29/vegetarianism-good-for-your-heart-and-your-wallet/">Vegetarianism: Good for your heart ... and your wallet!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/29/vegetarianism-good-for-your-heart-and-your-wallet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/952316/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/29/vegetarianism-good-for-your-heart-and-your-wallet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Diet</category><category>Vegetarian</category><category>vegetarianism</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's is back with supersized sodas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/mcdonalds-is-back-with-supersized-sodas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/mcdonalds-is-back-with-supersized-sodas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/mcdonalds-is-back-with-supersized-sodas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><p><img height="118" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/hugo_main.jpg" width="250" align="right" vspace="4" border="\" /></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) has done much to bolster its reputation in the wake of media scandals led by the hit documentary 'Supersize Me.' It has launched wellness initiatives and created healthier menu options. The stock price has responded. But now supersized sodas are back, with a 42-ounce drink the company is calling "Hugo." <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/22/business/yourmoney/22feed.html?ref=business">The New York Times calls it</a> "Tubbo" which, at over 400-calories for a regular soda, seems appropriate.</p>
<p>The company defends the product by saying that super-sized sodas are back by popular demand and that people are thirstier during the summer. But here's why I'm not buying it: Any doctor would tell you that drinking 42-ounces of soda is extremely unhealthy, and it's wrong for a company to market a product that is, by definition, unhealthy for anyone.</p>
<p>The Times also points out that "Making matters worse, Hugo ads are available in several languages, making sure that minorities -- who are disproportionately affected by the obesity epidemic -- are aware of the budget beverage."</p>
<p>A few months ago, I wrote about "Hungry-Man's <a href="http://www.x-entertainment.com/articles/0744/">thousand-calorie breakfast</a>, which contains 231 percent of the recommended daily value for cholesterol in <em>one </em>serving. So the recommendation is that you consumer 2.3 times as much cholesterol at breakfast as you should during that entire day. No one should eat this product, and companies shouldn't market products that are <em>by definition</em> bad for you."</p>
<p>The same applies to McDonald's. It's socially irresponsible to sell a product that is hazardous to people's health in the serving size it is marketed at.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/mcdonalds-is-back-with-supersized-sodas/">McDonald's is back with supersized sodas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/22/business/yourmoney/22feed.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/mcdonalds-is-back-with-supersized-sodas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/946565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/mcdonalds-is-back-with-supersized-sodas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>food</category><category>health</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonald's</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is your credit card making you fat?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/is-your-credit-card-making-you-fat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/is-your-credit-card-making-you-fat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/is-your-credit-card-making-you-fat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="169" border="1" align="right" style="width: 183px; height: 137px;" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/22576778.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>I've heard lots of excuses for weight gain -- depression, stress, work, injuries, kids, but this is a new one: Blame your <a href="http://money.aol.com/creditdebt/cards">credit cards</a>!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/cc/20070704_credit_cards_fat_a1.asp">According to a piece on BankRate</a>, people tend to spend more when they use a credit card instead of cash, and that also applies to food purchases: "A Visa study of 100,000 restaurant transactions found that customers spent, on average, 30% more than those who paid with cash. That 30% can be the difference between a small order of fries and soft drink and a supersize order, or it can be the addition of a high-calorie dessert."</p>
<p>That an increase in the size of the check at a restaurant would lead to an increase in consumption is a no-brainer. So here's a diet tip: Pay cash when dining out. It'll keep your wallet heavier and you body lighter.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/is-your-credit-card-making-you-fat/">Is your credit card making you fat?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/cc/20070704_credit_cards_fat_a1.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/is-your-credit-card-making-you-fat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/935551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/is-your-credit-card-making-you-fat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>credit cards</category><category>CreditCards</category><category>diet</category><category>food</category><category>obesity</category><category>spending</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should your boss help you lose weight?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/01/should-your-boss-help-you-lose-weight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/01/should-your-boss-help-you-lose-weight/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/01/should-your-boss-help-you-lose-weight/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>As Americans get fatter and fatter, their employers <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/29/AR2007062900109.html">are looking to do something about it</a>. But it seems that most companies aren't just guided by altruism. According to an Associated Press piece, "A study published in April by a group of Duke University researchers showed obese employees had higher rates of workers' compensation claims, more lost work days and costlier medical bills than their trim coworkers."</p>
<p>Even <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WMT</a>) has gotten in on the act. In April, I wrote that Wal-Mart was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/05/the-deserving-working-poor-wal-mart-offers-self-help-classes/">starting a line of self-help classes</a> and group for its employees. In the states where the programs have been launched, 50% of employees have signed up for programs that involve quitting smoking, saving money on electricity, and healthy eating. Group aerobics classes and employee jogs have also taken root at the company.</p>
<p>Some might see efforts at helping employees lose weight as intrusive or big brother-ish. But this is a health issue, and given the employers will ultimately pay the price for unhealthy lifestyles, it's great that they are looking to help employees change.</p>
<p>While it's surprising that Wal-Mart is quietly leading the charge on this issue, it's indicative of the great power that Wal-Mart has to do good when it wants to.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/01/should-your-boss-help-you-lose-weight/">Should your boss help you lose weight?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Jul 2007 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/01/should-your-boss-help-you-lose-weight/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/930401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/01/should-your-boss-help-you-lose-weight/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>Duke University</category><category>DukeUniversity</category><category>health</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>weight loss</category><category>WeightLoss</category><category>WMT</category><category>workers compensation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are rising food prices actually good for the consumer?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/are-rising-food-prices-actually-good-for-the-consumer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/are-rising-food-prices-actually-good-for-the-consumer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/are-rising-food-prices-actually-good-for-the-consumer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><img style="WIDTH: 247px; HEIGHT: 162px" height="162" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/supermarket-1.jpg" width="247" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<p>If you do the shopping in your household, you've probably noticed that grocery prices are on the rise. Prices rose 4.4% in May year over year, and 2007 is shaping up to be the biggest single-year increase since 1990. The increase is largely attributable to rising energy costs and until that lets up (Any guesses?), Americans probably won't find much relief at the supermarket.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1635836,00.html">According to Time Magazine</a>, this might not be such bad news: After all, shouldn't an increase in food costs lead to a drop in consumption, and let a little bit of the bloat out of country's collective waist line?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/are-rising-food-prices-actually-good-for-the-consumer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are rising food prices actually good for the consumer?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/are-rising-food-prices-actually-good-for-the-consumer/">Are rising food prices actually good for the consumer?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1635836,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/are-rising-food-prices-actually-good-for-the-consumer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/926215/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/are-rising-food-prices-actually-good-for-the-consumer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Diet</category><category>Food</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[KFC to eliminate trans fat in chicken]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/kfc-to-eliminate-trans-fat-in-chicken/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/kfc-to-eliminate-trans-fat-in-chicken/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/kfc-to-eliminate-trans-fat-in-chicken/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yum/" rel="tag">Yum Brands (YUM)</a></p><p><img style="WIDTH: 124px; HEIGHT: 102px" height="102" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/kfc.jpg" width="124" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></p>
<p>KFC, a subsidiary of Yum Brands (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yum-brands-inc/yum/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">YUM</a>), has announced that it will eliminate trans fat from its fried chicken, and proudly proclaims this fact on its buckets. While it's certainly good news from a health perspective, I wonder if it will have any positive impact on the company's marketing: Does anyone who eats Kentucky Fried Chicken really care about their health anyway?</p>
<p>This seems a little bit like offering a kosher menu at a fundraising event for a church. The people who will be impressed by the change to trans fat-free still won't be going there anyway.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/kfc-to-eliminate-trans-fat-in-chicken/">KFC to eliminate trans fat in chicken</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117790475119686686.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/kfc-to-eliminate-trans-fat-in-chicken/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/885404/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/kfc-to-eliminate-trans-fat-in-chicken/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>health</category><category>trans fat</category><category>TransFat</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NutriSystem gaining like crazy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/nutrisystem-gaining-like-crazy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/nutrisystem-gaining-like-crazy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/nutrisystem-gaining-like-crazy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/fries426.jpg" />Contradicting those who say there is no fat left in the American market, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nutrisystem-inc/ntri/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">NutriSystem</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nutrisystem-inc/ntri/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">NTRI</a>) has made our waistlines its bottom line, and it too is growing nicely. Having outlasted the Atkins craze, the company yesterday reported a hefty 62% increase in earning for the first quarter of 2007 of $238.6 million. Better yet, net income grew 70%, bringing EPS to $1.04, <a href="http://ec.thomsonfn.com/DomesticEarnings/CompanyEarnings?transform=estimates-de&amp;pid=Mzg0UVU5TUxURT1QJFkEQUALSTO&amp;ticker=NTRI">well above the $.91 expected by analysts</a> polled by First Call/Thompson Financial. This compares to a skinny $.60 in 2006.</p>
<p>Ironically, the company is thriving, according to CEO Michael E. Hagen, in part from its failure to provide a long term solution for its customers. In his words, "an integral part of our first quarter has been the ongoing expansion of our pool of ex-customers and their desire to return to NutriSystem for weight management services. The operating margin expansion we saw in the first quarter was partially due to the growth in revenue from ex-customers." Direct sales were also a hefty contributor, up 52% over 2006 to 358,000. Confident in the American appetite for cheesy fries, the company raised guidance for 2007 to $3.34-$3.46.</p>
<p>The company's emphasis on direct sales, lack of direct competitors and its valuable, ever-growing database of people who share my tendency to expand and contract, cause long-term prospects for NutriSystem to look plump. After all, if you pair a milkshake ad, candy bar ad, or a beer ad with a swimsuit ad, what do you get? A NutriSystem ad. <br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/nutrisystem-gaining-like-crazy/">NutriSystem gaining like crazy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/nutrisystem-gaining-like-crazy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/882736/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/nutrisystem-gaining-like-crazy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>diet foods</category><category>diet industry</category><category>DietFoods</category><category>DietIndustry</category><category>direct sale diet foods</category><category>DirectSaleDietFoods</category><category>NTRI</category><category>NutriSystem</category><category>weight loss industry</category><category>WeightLossIndustry</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coke Zero is no zero, it's a big hit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/coke-zero-is-no-zero-its-a-big-hit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/coke-zero-is-no-zero-its-a-big-hit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/coke-zero-is-no-zero-its-a-big-hit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cce/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE)</a></p><p><img width="183" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="145" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/finalcherylbarhighres.jpg" style="width: 214px; height: 176px;" /></p>
<p>In titling this post, I was going to go with the inevitable pun of "Zero being <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/KO/nys">The Coca-Cola Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/KO/nys">KO</a>) Hero" but, unfortunately,<em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117677526243072170.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">The</a></em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1176809828296*/"> <em>Wall Street Journal</em> beat me to the punch</a>. As consumers move away from soda and toward more healthful premium beverages (such as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/coke-swallows-vitamin-water/">Vitamin Water</a>, my personal favorite), Coke has had surprising success with Coke Zero, a zero-calorie version of Coke which apparently tastes less like poison than regular Diet Coke. According to Coca Cola Chairman and CEO E. Neville Isdell, the initial success of Zero makes it Coke's most successful new product launch in 20 years.</p>
<p>As a young consumer, I believe that Coke Zero's success is largely a function of slick marketing campaign. They've actually managed to make diet soda cool. The slick ad campaign, which included slick, <em>GQ</em>-esque ads, in addition to funny ads that invited readers to sign up for a class-action lawsuit suing Coke Zero for tasting too much like regular Coke.</p>
<p>As beverages from companies like Jones Soda gain in popularity and cache, the traditional soft drink companies will need to revitalize their images. Coke has done just that with Coke Zero and they will probably continue to experience success.</p>
<br /><strong>More <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/coke-swallows-vitamin-water/">Vitamin Water</a> news<br /> <br /> Beth Gaston Moon: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View High school vending machines getting more eclectic on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/high-school-vending-machines-getting-more-eclectic/">High school vending machines getting more eclectic</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View PepsiCo plans a lower-calorie Gatorade on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/pepsico-plans-a-lower-calorie-gatorade/">PepsiCo plans a lower-calorie Gatorade</a><br /> <strong>Jonathan Berr: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Coke, Pepsi thirst for profits from bottled water on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/coke-pepsi-thirst-for-profits-from-bottled-water/">Coke, Pepsi thirst for profits from bottled water</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Experts doubt Snapple will satisfy Coke on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/06/experts-doubt-snapple-will-satisfy-coke/">Experts doubt Snapple will satisfy Coke</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Will Coca-Cola gulp down Snapple? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/will-coca-cola-gulp-down-snapple/">Will Coca-Cola gulp down Snapple?</a><br /> <strong>Joseph Lazzaro: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Coke's catching up in the health drink segment on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/29/cokes-catching-up-in-the-health-drink-segment/">Coke's catching up in the health drink segment</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Coke swallows Vitaminwater on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/coke-swallows-vitamin-water/">Coke swallows Vitaminwater</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Coke wants vitamin water on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/25/coke-wants-vitamin-water/">Coke wants vitamin water</a><br /> <strong>Sarah Gilbert: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Fuze acquisition pits Coke v. Pepsi in ritzy juice war on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/fuze-acquisition-pits-coke-v-pepsi-in-ritzy-juice-war/">Fuze acquisition pits Coke v. Pepsi in ritzy juice war</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/coke-zero-is-no-zero-its-a-big-hit/">Coke Zero is no zero, it's a big hit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117677526243072170.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/coke-zero-is-no-zero-its-a-big-hit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/875956/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/coke-zero-is-no-zero-its-a-big-hit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Beverage</category><category>Coke Zero</category><category>CokeZero</category><category>Diet</category><category>soda</category><category>Warrem Buffett</category><category>WarremBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What good is money if you've lost touch with your wild side?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/what-good-is-money-if-youve-lost-touch-with-your-wild-side/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/what-good-is-money-if-youve-lost-touch-with-your-wild-side/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/what-good-is-money-if-youve-lost-touch-with-your-wild-side/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>I just read an interesting little <a href="http://www.thatsfit.com/2007/04/01/why-are-wild-women-always-thinner/">blog post over on That's Fit</a> by Rigel Gregg. It provides a link to an <a href="http://www.ediets.com/news/article.cfm/cmi_2426398/code_30177">article at eDiets</a> by Dr. Matthew Anderson regarding the proposition that "domestication" of our wild side can lead to being unfit. While the seed article itself is interesting and leaves plenty of room for debate, for me it re-opened the door to one of my core concepts of healthy living, which is: Health and happiness reside mostly in the mind.</p>
<p>Let us imagine that you just hit it big in the markets. That stock you put $1,000 into has just jumped 300%. You sold out quick and realized all your profit. After fees and taxes you will be sitting on a small fortune, providing that you follow the advice of a qualified CPA.</p>
<p>But answer me this: If you had spent the week prior to getting your stock market windfall beating yourself up about being 30 pounds too heavy, not having a partner, never having had the opportunity to go to college, or because your hair is getting thin, what makes anything any different now that you made a lucky pick that generated some cash? If you hang your happiness on anything that is truly beyond your own control, then that happiness shall never be found, and true health shall remain beyond your grasp.</p>
<p>So, as you make your stock picks and research all of your investment plans, please do me one small favor. I promise it won't hurt one bit. Remind yourself that regardless of what the markets do, your own personal happiness is kept mainly within your grasp. Yes, loads of cash can make life easier, and there are many health issues that shall be visited upon each of us that are beyond our own control. But within the framework of circumstances that create your existence, the intangible concept of happiness can be had without a price tag, and it shall always provide compounded returns when properly invested.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/what-good-is-money-if-youve-lost-touch-with-your-wild-side/">What good is money if you've lost touch with your wild side?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/what-good-is-money-if-youve-lost-touch-with-your-wild-side/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/869811/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/what-good-is-money-if-youve-lost-touch-with-your-wild-side/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diet</category><category>domestication</category><category>happiness</category><category>health</category><category>investment</category><category>money</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
