<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: Eastman Kodak battles the digital era]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-kodak-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade?icid=100214839x1206443214x1200311100">this series</a>, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.</em></p>
<p>Be honest -- when was the last time you dropped off a roll of film to be developed? If your response dates back to the 1990s, the unpleasant fate of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">Eastman Kodak Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>) probably doesn't need too much explaining. The way we take pictures and use paper has shifted drastically in the past decade, and Eastman has struggled in its attempts to keep up (with more "struggling" than "keeping up" involved, nearly every step of the way).</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At No. 11 on our list of SPX dawdlers, EK shed 80% of its value during from June 30, 1998 through June 30, 2008. The stock tapped an all-time high near $95 in early 1997; during the decade in question, the shares peaked at $88.94 in July 1998. It was to be the first in a long series of lower highs for EK as it cascaded down the charts.</p>
<p>Eastman Kodak entered 1998 with an aggressive turnaround plan. The elimination of 20% of EK's payroll was meant to help stem the tide of diminishing profits and market share for the one-time leviathan of photography; the company was floundering in the face of heightened competition from the likes of Fuji. EK also unloaded a chain of retail stores and non-core businesses, but a gradual increase in profits couldn't mask disappointing sales growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: Eastman Kodak battles the digital era</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/">Worst 10-year performers: Eastman Kodak battles the digital era</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>digital</category><category>Eastman Kodak</category><category>EastmanKodak</category><category>EK</category><category>film</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ringo Starr follows Paul and John on Apple's (AAPL) iTunes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/beatles-ringo-starr-emi-catalog-apple-aapl-itunes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/beatles-ringo-starr-emi-catalog-apple-aapl-itunes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/beatles-ringo-starr-emi-catalog-apple-aapl-itunes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="320" border="1" align="right" alt="Ringo Starr detailed from artist David Adickes' Beatles sculptures in Houston, TX." src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/ringo-starr-beatles.jpg" />Ringo Starr's post-Beatles <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emi-grp-ord-14p/emi/ise">EMI</a> (LSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emi-grp-ord-14p/emi/ise">EMI</a>) catalog goes up for sale digitally today, making him the third Beatle whose solo catalog has become available on digital retailers such as 7digital.com and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>)'s iTunes Store. Starr's EMI catalog, which includes four albums released between 1970 and 1974, joins the rest of his catalog in those online stores. Today also marks the release of a new compilation CD from Ringo under the EMI banner to promote the online offering, the first time the drummer has been with the British music giant since his Beatle contract ended in 1975.<br /><br />The solo catalogs of Paul McCartney and John Lennon have been for sale for three months and two weeks, respectively, though the digital sale of Ringo's catalog <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/another-beatle-to-issue-solo-catalog-digitally/">was announced</a> shortly after McCartney's became available. Lennon's catalog was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/another-solo-beatle-catalog-goes-up-for-sale-on-itunes/">issued online quite unexpectedly</a> earlier this month. The only catalog not available digitally is George Harrison's, which has seen new CD remasters released periodically over the past seven years. Of those remasters, only last year's update of <em>Living in the Material World</em> and this year's reissue of the Traveling Wilburys collection are available from various digital retailers.<br /><br />Rumors continue to circle that The Beatles catalog itself may be issued by the end of this year or sometime early next year, but nothing has been confirmed or denied. In the past year alone, The Beatles have experienced a kind of celebratory resurgence after the opening of the Las Vegas Cirque du Soleil show, <em>Love</em>, and the release of the accompanying soundtrack album. The month of June witnessed various solo and related projects from the Beatles members charting high in the <em>Billboard </em>200 (the only Beatle missing was Ringo). The new digital catalog and accompanying compilation may change that fact, giving all four Beatles hit albums in 2007. A film due for release next month will additionally explore the music of The Beatles and the time period they lived in.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/beatles-ringo-starr-emi-catalog-apple-aapl-itunes/">Ringo Starr follows Paul and John on Apple's (AAPL) iTunes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/beatles-ringo-starr-emi-catalog-apple-aapl-itunes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/975358/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/beatles-ringo-starr-emi-catalog-apple-aapl-itunes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Beatles</category><category>digital</category><category>featured</category><category>iTunes</category><category>music</category><category>Ringo Starr</category><category>RingoStarr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Driver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: US Steel's (X) volatility up on Atticus Capital rumors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/option-update-us-steels-x-volatility-up-on-atticus-capital-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/option-update-us-steels-x-volatility-up-on-atticus-capital-r/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/option-update-us-steels-x-volatility-up-on-atticus-capital-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eat/" rel="tag">Brinker Intl (EAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source="><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></a><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">US Steel</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">X</a>) volatility Up on unconfirmed chatter that Atticus is building stake. X is recently down $3.18 to $89.49. Unconfirmed chatter is circulating that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/atticus-capital-hedge-fund-betting-on-grand-slams/">Atticus Capital</a> has acquired a 10% stake in X. X September option implied volatility of 45 is above its 26-week average of 38 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price fluctuations.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tivo-inc/tivo/nas">TiVo</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tivo-inc/tivo/nas">TIVO</a>) calls active as TIVO trades near 10-month high. TIVO, a digital video recorder provider, is recently up 64 cents to $7.01. TIVO has a market cap of $682 million. TIVO September 7.5 calls have traded 25 times on transaction volume of 1,300 contracts above its open interest of 435 contracts. TIVO September option implied volatility of 57 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional risk.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/brinker-international-inc/eat/nys">Brinker</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/brinker-international-inc/eat/nys">EAT</a>) volatility up; EAT talking to investors about selling Macaroni Grill. EAT operates restaurant concepts including; Chili's, Macaroni Grill, Maggiono's &amp; On the Border. Goldman Sachs says "EAT reported 4Q operating EPS of $0.57, ahead of our $0.47 estimate. The overage came largely from a lower tax rate, share count, and modest expense variance." Dow Jones reported EAT "is talking with a 'number of investors' about the possible sale of its Romano's Macaroni Grill chain." EAT September option implied volatility of 33 is above its 26-week average of 29 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk. </p>
<p><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/option-update-us-steels-x-volatility-up-on-atticus-capital-r/">Option update: US Steel's (X) volatility up on Atticus Capital rumors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/option-update-us-steels-x-volatility-up-on-atticus-capital-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/961662/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/option-update-us-steels-x-volatility-up-on-atticus-capital-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Atticus Capital</category><category>AtticusCapital</category><category>digital</category><category>digital video recorder</category><category>DigitalVideoRecorder</category><category>EAT</category><category>EPS</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>Macaroni Grill</category><category>MacaroniGrill</category><category>Maggiono's</category><category>market cap</category><category>MarketCap</category><category>On the Border.</category><category>OnTheBorder.</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>restaurant concepts</category><category>RestaurantConcepts</category><category>Steel</category><category>tax rate</category><category>TaxRate</category><category>transaction</category><category>US Steel</category><category>UsSteel</category><category>X</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><img width="160" height="NaN" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/blogginggary.jpg" />This Internet is starting to tighten up a bit and I don't like it. Mostly, I'm a little irritated that moves are being made that seek to pigeonhole our options as content producers and seekers. Call me the consummate conspiracy theoretician if you want to, but I say right at the head of this movement is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>). The following scenario components may provide special interest to the fanciers of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). You may also be interested in these tidbits if you hold a chunk of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). <br /><br />About two months ago the online auction proposition was dumped by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) They gave no real explanation as to why they were doing it. They just closed up shop. Now, they have entered into a joint venture regarding a <a href="http://www.revenuesource.com/internet-marketing-articles/16937-yahoo-ebay-turn-out-toolbar.html">Yahoo! search tool for eBay.</a> Now that answers some questions, doesn't it.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/">eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/945145/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bar</category><category>digital</category><category>eBay</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Firefox</category><category>Google</category><category>images</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>search</category><category>tool</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ten reasons I want to own an iPhone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-ten-reasons-i-want-to-own-an-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-ten-reasons-i-want-to-own-an-iphone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-ten-reasons-i-want-to-own-an-iphone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p><p><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/iphone05-header-by-oscalito.jpg" align="right" />There may be many good reasons to own an iPhone from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>). Although I still haven't gotten my hands on one, I have been able to get a good look at some of what the device can do. Perhaps these aren't the ten <em>best</em> reasons, but they are ten good ones.</p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge, all of the photo gallery images that I'm providing here for you have been sent using the iPhone. Though I'm impressed, I did notice that the iPhone image quality declines slightly as light levels decrease, but it still does remarkably well for a phone. Yes folks, the attached gallery pictures were sent by mobile phones.</p>
<p>The gallery images are all at original resolutions and are all unretouched. If it is true that we can now take digital images of this quality and instantly download them to our favorite picture manager as well as e-mail them to anywhere in the world that we choose, it is my opinion that the makers of memory cards for digital cameras had better be working on some new product ideas, because I'm guessing that image data storage has just taken a turn for the best. <br /><br />Please do enjoy the gallery.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/iphone-mania/">iphone mania</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/iphone-mania/310875/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/iphone05-by-oscalito_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/iphone-mania/310870/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/iphone01-by-orange_beard_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/iphone-mania/310879/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/iphone09-by-andre-charland_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/iphone-mania/310871/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/iphone02-by-mat-honan_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/iphone-mania/310872/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/iphone03-by-alex-kehr_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-ten-reasons-i-want-to-own-an-iphone/">Ten reasons I want to own an iPhone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-ten-reasons-i-want-to-own-an-iphone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/939776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-ten-reasons-i-want-to-own-an-iphone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BloggingStocks</category><category>camera</category><category>digg</category><category>digital</category><category>engadget</category><category>image</category><category>iphone</category><category>photo</category><category>picture</category><category>send</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 6-28-07: BBBY, DISK, DRIV and JNJ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/analyst-downgrades-6-28-07-bbby-disk-driv-and-jnj/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/analyst-downgrades-6-28-07-bbby-disk-driv-and-jnj/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/analyst-downgrades-6-28-07-bbby-disk-driv-and-jnj/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbby/" rel="tag">Bed Bath and Beyond (BBBY)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> Chittenden Corp (CHZ), Digital River (DRIV), Image Entertainment (DISK) and Foot Locker (FL) were today's noteworthy downgrades:
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chittenden-corporation/chz/nys">Chittenden Corp </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chittenden-corporation/chz/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CHZ</a>) was downgraded to Sell from Hold at AG Edwards based on the buyout news from People's United Financial (PBCT).  </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/digital-river-inc/driv/nas">Digital River</a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chittenden-corporation/chz/nys"> </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/digital-river-inc/driv/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">DRIV</a>) was downgraded to Hold from Buy, and its target was cut to $44, at Jeffries based on the weak Microsoft (MSFT) ramp and weakness in the Symantec (SYMC) transition. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>SMH Capital downgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/image-entertainment-inc/disk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Image Entertainment </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/image-entertainment-inc/disk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">DISK</a>) to Sell from Neutral and recommends investors take profits on the upside and sell shares. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/foot-locker-inc/fl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Foot Locker</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/foot-locker-inc/fl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">FL</a>) was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Matrix, as the firm believes fundamentals trends are turning negative; the firm sees limited upside from current levels. </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bed-bath-and-38-beyond-inc/bbby/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Bed Bath &amp; Beyond</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bed-bath-and-38-beyond-inc/bbby/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">BBBY</a>) was downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at Raymond James. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-38-johnson/jnj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-38-johnson/jnj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">JNJ</a>) was removed from Goldman Sachs' Americas Conviction Buy List. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/web-com-inc/wwww/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Web.com </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/web-com-inc/wwww/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">WWWW</a>) was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Roth Capital Partners. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/andrew-corporation/andw/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Andrew Corp </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/andrew-corporation/andw/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ANDW</a>) was downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Oppenheimer. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>JP Morgan downgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/skywest-inc/skyw/nas">SkyWest </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/skywest-inc/skyw/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SKYW</a>) to Underweight from Overweight and shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/republic-airways-holdings-inc/rjet/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Republic Airways Holdings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/republic-airways-holdings-inc/rjet/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">RJET</a>) to Neutral from Overweight.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/analyst-downgrades-6-28-07-bbby-disk-driv-and-jnj/">Analyst downgrades 6-28-07: BBBY, DISK, DRIV and JNJ</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/analyst-downgrades-6-28-07-bbby-disk-driv-and-jnj/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/928696/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/analyst-downgrades-6-28-07-bbby-disk-driv-and-jnj/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>andrew</category><category>andw</category><category>bbby</category><category>bed bath</category><category>BedBath</category><category>chittenden</category><category>chz</category><category>digital</category><category>disj</category><category>downgrade</category><category>driv</category><category>fl</category><category>foot locker</category><category>FootLocker</category><category>image</category><category>jnj</category><category>johnson</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>pbct</category><category>people united financial</category><category>PeopleUnitedFinancial</category><category>rating</category><category>republic airways</category><category>RepublicAirways</category><category>rjet</category><category>skyw</category><category>skywest</category><category>symantec</category><category>symc</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>web.com</category><category>wkyw</category><category>wwww</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft wants to take your picture]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/microsoft-wants-to-take-your-picture/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/microsoft-wants-to-take-your-picture/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/microsoft-wants-to-take-your-picture/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p>Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/nys">MSFT</a>) figures it is not in enough businesses already, so it plans to offer a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117392781049237846.html?mod=todays_us_personal_journal">high-definition photo</a> [subscription required] format to the world's camera industry. The old standard, the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) compression format, has been around awhile and may not be able to break down photos into small files as well as Microsoft can.</p>
<p>The move by MSFT is not unlike the one that it made into the video world five years ago. It offered its Windows Media video compression in place of the old MPEG-2 standard for breaking down video files for transmission.</p>
<p>Moving photos around the internet is a big business. Companies like PhotoBucket and Flickr would not exist if photos could not be broken down digitally and sent over IP. The Microsoft product offers the opportunity to do this with less bandwidth usage than the JPEG format.</p>
<p>There is a lot at stake. Research firm NPD Group said that digital camera sales hit $6.9 billion in 2006. The new software could be a blessing for that industry.</p>
<p>Microsoft does not want money for the new technology; it is part of Vista. The world's largest software company thinks this might drive consumers to adopt Vista faster. It may be right.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/microsoft-wants-to-take-your-picture/">Microsoft wants to take your picture</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117392781049237846.html?mod=todays_us_personal_journal>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/microsoft-wants-to-take-your-picture/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/853166/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/microsoft-wants-to-take-your-picture/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>digital</category><category>digital photography</category><category>digital photos</category><category>DigitalPhotography</category><category>DigitalPhotos</category><category>flickr</category><category>jpeg</category><category>microsoft</category><category>mpeg</category><category>mpeg-2</category><category>msft</category><category>photobucket</category><category>vista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How far forward do you like to look?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/how-far-forward-do-you-like-to-look/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/how-far-forward-do-you-like-to-look/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/how-far-forward-do-you-like-to-look/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/question-mark02.jpg" />There's an interesting little website that I like to visit and lurk around called, <a href="http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/issues">FreeSoftwareMagazine.com</a> . For the most part, those folks are talking waaaaay over my head, but I like to go there and read with the hope that something worth while might sink into this massively opinionated brain of mine. A wonderfully gifted writer over there has documented an opinion of his which really grabbed my attention. I'm thinking that this guy is giving us a look directly into where a major portion of the future of our tech world is going.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/blogs/the_end_of_cds">Jabari Zakiya is the author</a> and what he is predicting the eventual demise of the CD and DVD. His claim is that as the costs related to flash drive data storage systems recede into a consumer affordable context, those drives shall come to replace the optical disc drives we are so familiar with. He states that he believes this will change the very design and nature of our PCs. He makes a compelling case in which I'm inclined to agree.</p>
<p>I suspect that companies such as Sony Corp. (NYSE:SNE), Apple Computer Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), Hewlett-PackardCo. (NYSE:HPQ) and Dell Inc. (NASDAQ:DELL) are quite up to speed on this concept and the implications it entails. This could be an upcoming change with an impact similar to the changes in data presentation from analog to digital. I don't really think that flash drives will bring on the demise of the CDs we've come to know. I will, however, buy into the concept that the coming generations of computers are preparing to take on new systems and forms that we have only dreamed about up until now.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/how-far-forward-do-you-like-to-look/">How far forward do you like to look?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/how-far-forward-do-you-like-to-look/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/724970/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/how-far-forward-do-you-like-to-look/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analog</category><category>apple</category><category>dell</category><category>digital</category><category>disc drive</category><category>DiscDrive</category><category>flash drive</category><category>FlashDrive</category><category>free software magazine</category><category>FreeSoftwareMagazine</category><category>future</category><category>hewlett packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>memory</category><category>optical disc</category><category>OpticalDisc</category><category>sony</category><category>storage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE &amp; NBC expect a billion in digital profits -- only the beginning?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/12/ge-and-nbc-expect-a-billion-in-digital-profits-only-the-beginni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/12/ge-and-nbc-expect-a-billion-in-digital-profits-only-the-beginni/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/12/ge-and-nbc-expect-a-billion-in-digital-profits-only-the-beginni/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="167" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/591573_my_tv.jpg" alt="Internet-ready televison" id="vimage_1" />NBC, a subsidiary of General Electric (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), expects to make a billion in <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/09/11/news/companies/nbc_digital.reut/index.htm?section=money_topstories">profit</a> from digital content by 2009. This, from a company that actively tried to <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/02/17/nbc_nastygrams_youtu.html">quash</a> viral web clip activity early in the year, even though that one clip "Lazy Sunday" arguably made <em>Saturday Night Live</em> hip again -- or at least got people talking about the show. Over at our sister blog, TVSquad, Brett Love <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2006/09/12/atandt-to-offer-20-channels-of-broadband-tv/">reports</a> that AT&amp;T is set to offer 20 web channels of broadband internet television. Right here, my colleague Victoria Erhart <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2006/09/12/atandt-to-offer-20-channels-of-broadband-tv/">wrote about</a> Time Warner's new offerings. It's a long way from the original <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webtv">WebTV</a>. <br /><br />Al Gore (himself a <a href="http://tv.netscape.com/story/2006/08/15/al-gores-current-tv-doing-much-better-than-expected">TV exec</a>, besides his other projects) <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060827/wr_nm/media_gore_tv_dc_1">believes</a> that television needs to become more internet-like, that the internet itself is still a long ways from being technologically able to replicate television's power to reach people. <br /><br />Has <strong>mainstream video content</strong> on the internet reached the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipping_point">tipping point</a>? Maybe the real question is, how long from now is the day when the internet and television are the same thing?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/12/ge-and-nbc-expect-a-billion-in-digital-profits-only-the-beginni/">GE &amp; NBC expect a billion in digital profits -- only the beginning?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/12/ge-and-nbc-expect-a-billion-in-digital-profits-only-the-beginni/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/667389/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/12/ge-and-nbc-expect-a-billion-in-digital-profits-only-the-beginni/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>digital</category><category>digital media</category><category>DigitalMedia</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>internet</category><category>nbc</category><category>television</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tvsquad</category><category>video clips</category><category>VideoClips</category><category>webtv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:52:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
