<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Get Ready for Goldman Sachs to Bounce!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" />For weeks, Goldman Sachs has been swinging in the wind as the SEC charges were made, Senate hearings (chest pounding) were conducted and it was announced that the DOJ was investigating Goldman and the rest of the Wall Street banking club.</p>
<p>This week, I posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/goldman-sachs-how-low-will-it-go/" title="View How Much Further Can Goldman Sachs Drop? on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">How Much Further Can Goldman Sachs Drop?</a> at the behest of one of our editors. Today, amid the rumors that settlement talks are under way between Goldman Sachs and the SEC, I am wondering how much the stock will bounce when rumors become reality? I would bet a lot. I have bet a lot.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Get Ready for Goldman Sachs to Bounce!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/">Get Ready for Goldman Sachs to Bounce!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 22 May 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19487343/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DOJ</category><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>Goldman Sachs fraud</category><category>GS</category><category>SEC</category><category>SEC fines</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>Wall Street Greed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DOT overrides Justice, Continental Airlines wins antitrust relief]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/cal-continental-airlines-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys" target="_blank">Continental Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys" target="_blank">CAL</a>) just <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-10-continental-ati-ok_N.htm" target="_blank">got the relief it needs to compete</a>. Despite resistance from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofJustice/">Department of Justice</a> (which can only recommend), the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofTransportation/">Department of Transportation</a> has granted the airline immunity from antitrust laws. This clears the way for Continental to work with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">United Airlines</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">UAUA</a>) -- and other carriers -- on international routes. Now, the airline can join <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/StarAlliance/">Star Alliance</a>, which already has antitrust immunity. </p>
<p>At the same time, DOT approved a joint venture among Continental, United, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-lufthansa-s-adr/dlaky/nao" target="_blank">Lufthansa</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-lufthansa-s-adr/dlaky/nao" target="_blank">DLAKY</a>) and Air Canada. This new relationship would involve trans-Atlantic routes.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DOT overrides Justice, Continental Airlines wins antitrust relief</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/">DOT overrides Justice, Continental Airlines wins antitrust relief</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-10-continental-ati-ok_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19095353/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>american air travel</category><category>american airline</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AmericanAirline</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>AmericanAirTravel</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>amrcorp</category><category>AmrCorp.</category><category>continental</category><category>continental airlines</category><category>ContinentalAirlines</category><category>dal</category><category>delta</category><category>delta air lines</category><category>deltaairlines</category><category>department of justice</category><category>department of transportation</category><category>DepartmentOfJustice</category><category>DepartmentOfTransportation</category><category>doj</category><category>dot</category><category>inthenews</category><category>skyteam</category><category>star alliance</category><category>StarAlliance</category><category>ual</category><category>ual corp.</category><category>ual corporation</category><category>ualcorp</category><category>UalCorp.</category><category>UalCorporation</category><category>uaua</category><category>united</category><category>united airlines</category><category>UnitedAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Justice Department pushes back on Continental immunity request]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/justice-department-pushes-back-on-continental-immunity-request/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/justice-department-pushes-back-on-continental-immunity-request/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/justice-department-pushes-back-on-continental-immunity-request/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/cal-continental-airlines-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys" target="_blank">Continental Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys" target="_blank">CAL</a>) is <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-06-29-doj-continental-antitrust-immunity_N.htm" target="_blank">seeking immunity from antitrust laws</a> to work more closely with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">United Airlines</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">UAUA</a>) and others on international routes. And, since airlines operate in a state of seemingly perpetual turmoil, what's the harm? According to the Justice Department: plenty.</p>
<p>The airline sought broad immunity as part of an effort to join Star Alliance, which includes US Airways, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-lufthansa-s-adr/dlaky/nao" target="_blank">Lufthansa</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-lufthansa-s-adr/dlaky/nao" target="_blank">DLAKY</a>), and Air Canada -- along with United. Continental believes that it needs to join Star Alliance in order to remain competitive, especially with airlines that have this type of immunity already.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/justice-department-pushes-back-on-continental-immunity-request/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Justice Department pushes back on Continental immunity request</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/justice-department-pushes-back-on-continental-immunity-request/">Justice Department pushes back on Continental immunity request</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/justice-department-pushes-back-on-continental-immunity-request/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19082008/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/justice-department-pushes-back-on-continental-immunity-request/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american airlines</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>continental airlines</category><category>dal</category><category>delta air lines</category><category>department of justice</category><category>department of transportation</category><category>doj</category><category>inthenews</category><category>justice department</category><category>justice dept.</category><category>lufthansa</category><category>star alliance</category><category>StarAlliance</category><category>us airways</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC now decides if satellite radio lives or dies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/sirius-siri-logo.gif" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) $5 billion acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) was cleared by the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/tech-news/_a/justice-department-clears-xm-sirius-deal/20080324151509990001">U.S. Department of Justice</a>. Now, all eyes turn to Federal Communications Commission to determine if satellite radio lives or dies.<br /><br />The acquisition -- not a merger -- has been held up for eons by phony arguments that combining these two floundering companies would limit choice. Terrestrial radio and consumer groups have been lobbying hard against the deal, arguing that anything that benefits Howard Stern can't be good for America.<br /><br />I can't see how the FCC can block a deal that the DOJ approved after examining the deal under and electron microscope. The medium won't survive if the companies stay separate. Even fans of satellite radio admit that it is a niche medium. Then again, so is cable TV.<br /><br />For me satellite radio is a godsend, particularly on long road trips. I enjoy listening to Sirius while tapping out my blog posts. I particularly like the commercial-free music channels. Regular radio has annoyed music fans by piling on commercial after commercial between tiny slivers of music. <br /><br />Satellite radio can avoid the fate of BetaMax by continuing to produce high-quality content that people want to buy. It's that simple and that complicated.<br /><em><br />Freelance writer Jonathan Berr edits the blog <a href="http://ketchupandeggs.wordpress.com">Ketchup and Eggs</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/">FCC now decides if satellite radio lives or dies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/tech-news/_a/justice-department-clears-xm-sirius-deal/20080324151509990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1147856/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>doj</category><category>fcc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>satelliteradio</category><category>siri</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Clear Channel secures an approval, closer to closing merger]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/clear-channel-secures-an-approval-closer-to-closing-merger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/clear-channel-secures-an-approval-closer-to-closing-merger/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/clear-channel-secures-an-approval-closer-to-closing-merger/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ccu/" rel="tag">Clear Channel Commun (CCU)</a></p>This near-lifelong private equity buyout of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clear-channel-communications-inc/ccu/nys">Clear Channel Communications</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clear-channel-communications-inc/ccu/nys">CCU</a>) may finally be coming to an end. Today the Department of justice <a href="http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/02-13-2008/0004755799&amp;EDATE=">issued a statement</a> after the close of the market. This merger is being cleared with some conditions. Assuming this closes at the stated price of $39.20, this would be indicative of a 32% merger-arb gain. Not bad at all for a near-$20 Billion private equity deal at a time when it seems like all super-deals in private equity are dead.<br /><br />Bain Capital and Thomas H. Lee can acquire the radio conglomerate if it divests radio stations in Houston, Las Vegas, Cincinnati, and San Francisco. This will prevent higher advertising prices in those markets. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ filed a suit today blocking the deal, but it filed a proposed settlement that would resolve competitive concerns.<br /><br />This does allow any person to submit written comments during a 60-day comment period. Just in the last couple weeks the merger-arb spread was indicating that this deal was looking at-risk.<br /><br />Now if we can just get these guys to approve the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius Satellite Radio</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) merger. There was a <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/02/boutique-callin.html">boutique research report</a> yesterday noting that a DOJ approval may be imminent.   <br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a partner at <a href="http://247WallSt.com">247WallSt.com</a></em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/clear-channel-secures-an-approval-closer-to-closing-merger/">Clear Channel secures an approval, closer to closing merger</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/02-13-2008/0004755799&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/clear-channel-secures-an-approval-closer-to-closing-merger/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1114563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/clear-channel-secures-an-approval-closer-to-closing-merger/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bain</category><category>CCU</category><category>Clear Channel</category><category>ClearChannel</category><category>DOJ</category><category>FCC</category><category>radio</category><category>SIRI</category><category>Sirius</category><category>Thomas H. Lee</category><category>Thomas Lee</category><category>XM</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Alberto Gonzales should have quit long ago]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/alberto-gonzales-should-have-quit-long-ago/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/alberto-gonzales-should-have-quit-long-ago/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/alberto-gonzales-should-have-quit-long-ago/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="250" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/ag_gonzales_medium.jpg" alt="" />Alberto Gonzales, probably the most incompetent and unpopular attorney general in history, resigned today effective September 17. This move is long, long overdue.</p>
<p>The Bush Administration is so out of touch with the American Public that it's frigtening. The anonymous official who leaked the resignation to the <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/27/washington/27cnd-gonzales.html?hp">New York Times</a> said, "The unfair treatment that he's been on the receiving end of has been a distraction for the department."</p>
<p>Oh brother.</p>
<p>People who are worried about negative publicity shouldn't do negative things.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/alberto-gonzales-should-have-quit-long-ago/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Alberto Gonzales should have quit long ago</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/alberto-gonzales-should-have-quit-long-ago/">Alberto Gonzales should have quit long ago</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/27/washington/27cnd-gonzales.html?hp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/alberto-gonzales-should-have-quit-long-ago/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/974806/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/alberto-gonzales-should-have-quit-long-ago/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alberto gonzales</category><category>AlbertoGonzales</category><category>department of justice</category><category>DepartmentOfJustice</category><category>DOJ</category><category>featured</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nyse</category><category>Politics</category><category>president bush</category><category>PresidentBush</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Microsoft seriously accusing someone else of antitrust violations?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/18/is-microsoft-seriously-accusing-someone-else-of-antitrust-violat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/18/is-microsoft-seriously-accusing-someone-else-of-antitrust-violat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/18/is-microsoft-seriously-accusing-someone-else-of-antitrust-violat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img style="WIDTH: 153px; HEIGHT: 111px" height="143" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/hypocrisy.png" width="189" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></p>
<p>The hypocrisy is stunning. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) is saying that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) acquisition of DoubleClick could lead to privacy issues for online consumers. Microsoft has asked regulators to look into the deal.</p>
<p>"This proposed acquisition raises serious competition and privacy concerns in that it gives the Google-DoubleClick combination unprecedented control in the delivery of online advertising, and access to a huge amount of consumer information," said Brad Smith, Microsoft's chief legal counsel, <a href="http://presszoom.com/story_129397.html">in a statement</a>. "We think this merger deserves close scrutiny from regulatory authorities to ensure a competitive online advertising market."</p>
<p>Rather than add my voice to the chorus of shock on this one, I'll just quote what other pundits are saying.</p>
<p>"Microsoft as the pot; Google as the Kettle" -<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/18138069">CNBC's Jim Goldman</a></p>
<p>"How's this for the pot calling the kettle black" - <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5378">ComputerWorld's Preston Galla</a></p>
<p>"Talk about the pot calling the kettle black." <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117685444290973306.html?mod=todays_us_personal_journal">Wall Street Journal's James B. Stewart</a></p>
<p>The sentiment is right but these guys need to find a new cliche.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/18/is-microsoft-seriously-accusing-someone-else-of-antitrust-violat/">Is Microsoft seriously accusing someone else of antitrust violations?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://presszoom.com/story_129397.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/18/is-microsoft-seriously-accusing-someone-else-of-antitrust-violat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/876889/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/18/is-microsoft-seriously-accusing-someone-else-of-antitrust-violat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>antitrust</category><category>doj</category><category>goog</category><category>internet</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>tech</category><category>WEB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Federal government may be taking a closer look at private equity deals]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/federal-government-may-be-taking-a-closer-look-at-private-equity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/federal-government-may-be-taking-a-closer-look-at-private-equity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/federal-government-may-be-taking-a-closer-look-at-private-equity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p>The recent tidal wave of private equity deals may be attracting the attention of federal antitrust regulators, according to the <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/ge-sets-private-equity-limits/20070109071409990011">Wall Street Journal</a>.</p>
<p>General Electric Co. (NYSE:GE) has told buyers interested in its plastics unit, which is valued at as much as $10 billion, that they "face restrictions on their ability to team up with other private-equity buyers," the paper said.The exact nature of these restrictions isn't clear but you can bet that the bankers are complaining loudly about them.</p>
<p>At issue are so-called private equity clubs where two or more firms join forces to bid on large deals, such as GE's plastics business, to spread out the risk, the Journal said, adding that "some takeover professionals have voiced concern that clubs may also limit the number of competing bidders and the value of potential bids."</p>
<p>You can be that GE isn't alone. It also wouldn't surprise me if the DOJ was reviewing past private equity deals involving clubs going back a few years. Antitrust regulators are probably going to look for a pattern of behavior. Whether they will find one won't become apparent for a while yet. Meanwhile, bankers, who aren't the type that get scared easily, are no doubt emailing that Journal article around to their colleagues and wondering what's going to happen next.</p>
<p><em>Jonathan Berr is editor of </em><a href="http://www.desperateinvestors.com"><em>http://www.desperateinvestors.com</em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/federal-government-may-be-taking-a-closer-look-at-private-equity/">Federal government may be taking a closer look at private equity deals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/federal-government-may-be-taking-a-closer-look-at-private-equity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/732413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/federal-government-may-be-taking-a-closer-look-at-private-equity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>antitrust</category><category>DOJ</category><category>mergers</category><category>private equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:57:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
