<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Dow Hits New 2011 High: What's Next?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/dow-hits-new-2011-high-whats-next/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/dow-hits-new-2011-high-whats-next/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/dow-hits-new-2011-high-whats-next/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kkd/" rel="tag">Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (KKD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/odp/" rel="tag">Office Depot (ODP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wallstreepicture.jpg" alt="" />Non-farm payrolls came in higher than analysts' forecasts and the unemployment rate fell to 8.8%. That good news sent the Dow Jones Industrial Average to a new 2011 high. At midday the Dow was up 78 points to 12,397 -- as reported by the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703712504576236243866654196.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</p>
<p>Except for a brief sell-off to the 11,500 level, the market has moved quickly to regain lost ground and is now at new highs. Last week the USDA's crop report was bullish for grains. It's not surprising that Caterpillar (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">CAT</a>) led the charge, up 1.7%. But there are always some losers. Office Depot (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/office-depot-inc/odp/nys">ODP</a>) fell 11% after reporting a fourth quarter loss and Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/krispy-kreme-doughnuts-inc/kkd/nys">KKD</a>), which also had a fourth quarter loss, fell 17%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/dow-hits-new-2011-high-whats-next/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow Hits New 2011 High: What's Next?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/dow-hits-new-2011-high-whats-next/">Dow Hits New 2011 High: What's Next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/dow-hits-new-2011-high-whats-next/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19900419/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/dow-hits-new-2011-high-whats-next/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Caterpillar</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>Dow New highs</category><category>economic data</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Krispy Kreme</category><category>Office Depot</category><category>stimulus QE2</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stocks with Ties to Independence Day - Part 1: US vs. UK]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/05/stocks-with-ties-to-independence-day-part-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/05/stocks-with-ties-to-independence-day-part-1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/05/stocks-with-ties-to-independence-day-part-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/flag.jpg" />The U.S. stock market is closed in observance of Independence day, which gives us a great opportunity to examine a few stocks with ties to the 4th of July.<br />
<br />
This first of this three-part series will start by comparing investment opportunities in the United States -- home of the authors of the Declaration of Independence -- with those across the pond in the United Kingdom -- whose monarch was the recipient of that declaration. Then we'll then take a look at a few of the stocks that help us maintain our freedom as we dive into the U.S. defense industry. Finally, we'll take a look at stocks that benefit from the partying and picnicking that are so much a part of any 4th of July celebration.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/05/stocks-with-ties-to-independence-day-part-1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stocks with Ties to Independence Day - Part 1: US vs. UK</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/05/stocks-with-ties-to-independence-day-part-1/">Stocks with Ties to Independence Day - Part 1: US vs. UK</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/05/stocks-with-ties-to-independence-day-part-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19542285/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/05/stocks-with-ties-to-independence-day-part-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barclays</category><category>bcs</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>FTSE 100</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>gs</category><category>hbc</category><category>hsbc</category><category>jpm</category><category>JPMorgan Chase</category><category>Lloyds Banking Group</category><category>lyg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wade Hansen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow on Verge of Worst Second Quarter Since 2002]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/dow-on-verge-of-worst-second-quarter-since-2002/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/dow-on-verge-of-worst-second-quarter-since-2002/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/dow-on-verge-of-worst-second-quarter-since-2002/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/nysetraders.jpg"  alt="" />So, how is that Summer of Recovery working out? Following Tuesday's drop, the market was slightly lower Wednesday morning thanks in part to the ADP payroll report. According to the report, employers <a target="_blank" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GLKN181&amp;show_article=1">added 13,000 jobs in June</a>, falling short of the consensus estimate for 60,000 jobs. This data looks at private-sector jobs only and suggests that payroll gains were tame in June thanks to small businesses that were cutting jobs.</p>
<p>All of Wednesday morning's news wasn't bad, as the European Central Bank (ECB) offer of three-month funds came in short of expectations. This data means that the region's banks may not be as ECB-dependent as some thought. In addition, the financial sector is prospering as the exposure to European banks was made to appear a bit less toxic. Furthermore, Democrats in Congress decided to take a bank tax off the table in the new financial overhaul bill. This move has helped bring Republicans on board and makes the bill look like it may pass.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/dow-on-verge-of-worst-second-quarter-since-2002/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow on Verge of Worst Second Quarter Since 2002</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/dow-on-verge-of-worst-second-quarter-since-2002/">Dow on Verge of Worst Second Quarter Since 2002</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/dow-on-verge-of-worst-second-quarter-since-2002/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19536845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/dow-on-verge-of-worst-second-quarter-since-2002/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>ECB</category><category>european central bank</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Contrarian Investing and Large Drops, Profitable or Wreckless?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/26/contrarian-investing-and-large-drops-profitable-or-wreckless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/26/contrarian-investing-and-large-drops-profitable-or-wreckless/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/26/contrarian-investing-and-large-drops-profitable-or-wreckless/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/fed-reaction.jpg" />Tuesday was quite a day in the stock market. The Dow Jones dropped more than 200 points, but rebounded to finish the day a mere 23 points lower. The action could have given traders whiplash -- but it could also have given contrarians the chance to make a few well-timed investments and rake in some cash. <br />
<br />
By definition, a contrarian investor makes investments based on the sentiment of the majority of investors. Yesterday set up a great contrarian bullish opportunity as experts and investors alike felt the sky was falling, pushing the Dow Jones Industrial Average to an intra-day nadir in the 9,800 region.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/26/contrarian-investing-and-large-drops-profitable-or-wreckless/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Contrarian Investing and Large Drops, Profitable or Wreckless?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/26/contrarian-investing-and-large-drops-profitable-or-wreckless/">Contrarian Investing and Large Drops, Profitable or Wreckless?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 May 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/26/contrarian-investing-and-large-drops-profitable-or-wreckless/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19491875/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/26/contrarian-investing-and-large-drops-profitable-or-wreckless/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>contrarian investing</category><category>DIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>ETF</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Has the Dow Set a Double Bottom?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/has-the-dow-set-a-double-bottom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/has-the-dow-set-a-double-bottom/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/has-the-dow-set-a-double-bottom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/investing.due-diligence.getty-rf2.jpg" />With the Dow looking set to open below the 10,000 level this morning, I decided to take a look at some technical statistics for the blue chip barometer. I was looking for some sort of signal that the Dow may be ready to turn around, perhaps the Dow was near some sort of support. Perhaps there is some technical formation that this latest "slight correction" has come to an end.</p>
<p>Something I found was that it looks like the Dow may have set a double bottom in the 9,900 region. A look at <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/dow-jones-industrial-average/%24indu/dji">a weekly chart </a>shows that this region acted as support in February, sending the Dow to its latest rally. Last week, the Dow bounced off this level and staged a late-week turnaround. The question is whether the Dow can maintain the momentum that started last week. In addition, the Dow may have found a measure of support from its 20-month moving average.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/has-the-dow-set-a-double-bottom/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Has the Dow Set a Double Bottom?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/has-the-dow-set-a-double-bottom/">Has the Dow Set a Double Bottom?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 May 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/has-the-dow-set-a-double-bottom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19490306/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/has-the-dow-set-a-double-bottom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow Jones Jumps 400 Points, Now What?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/dow-jones-jumps-400-points/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/dow-jones-jumps-400-points/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/dow-jones-jumps-400-points/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/traders_dec21_240.jpg" />So, Europe has stepped to the plate and agreed to a almost <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/market-news/">$1 trillion rescue plan</a> to help avert a debt crisis, with the U.S. Federal Reserve pledging to do its part for overseas loans. The move has been cheered on the Street, as the major indices are significantly higher, the Dow Jones leading the way with a more than 400-point gain. This gain makes up a good portion of last week's plunge, which was driven by fears that Greece's debt problems would eventually spread to all of Europe. The fear was that such a scenario would put the future of the euro and the economies of the 16 countries using the currency in economic peril.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/dow-jones-jumps-400-points/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow Jones Jumps 400 Points, Now What?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/dow-jones-jumps-400-points/">Dow Jones Jumps 400 Points, Now What?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 May 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/dow-jones-jumps-400-points/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19470982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/dow-jones-jumps-400-points/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DJIA</category><category>dow jones</category><category>dow jones industrial</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>euro</category><category>global economy</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow Jones Falls Below 11,000]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/dow-jones-falls-below-11-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/dow-jones-falls-below-11-000/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/dow-jones-falls-below-11-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/nyse-floor.jpg"  alt="" />As soon as the opening bell sounded this morning, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) plummeted more than 150 points - effectively ruining yesterday's 143-point gain. In fact, as I write this blog, the Dow fell past a 200-point loss. <br />
<br />
Why the drop? <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/stocks-slide-on-renewed-greece-debt/811170/">Blame it on Greece</a>, as the euro fell against the dollar thanks to worries that the Greek government will not be able to meet the rather stringent guidelines of its aid package. Moreover, the German government is set to provide most of the EU's support, and there is no guarantee that the electorate will back Chancellor Angela Merkel. Add this to the fact that German retail sales dropped more than 2% in March, and we have a full-blown European panic hitting Wall Street.<br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/dow-jones-falls-below-11-000/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow Jones Falls Below 11,000</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/dow-jones-falls-below-11-000/">Dow Jones Falls Below 11,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 May 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/dow-jones-falls-below-11-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19463905/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/dow-jones-falls-below-11-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Angela Merkel</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow</category><category>Dow Jones</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>Germany</category><category>Greece</category><category>Technical Analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[3M Company Enjoys a Solid Day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/3m-company-enjoys-a-solid-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/3m-company-enjoys-a-solid-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/3m-company-enjoys-a-solid-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mmm/" rel="tag">3M Corporation (MMM)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/3m-logo-240.jpg" />3M Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/3m-company/mmm/nys" target="_blank">MMM</a>) benefited from a comment from brokerage Morgan Stanley. The brokerage house believes that 3M will rally after an optimistic forecast from Danaher (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/danaher-corporation/dhr/nys" target="_blank">DHR</a>), which operates in many of the same markets as 3M. The broker believes that the stock will enjoy a nice <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/3m-shares-top-blue-chip-advancers-2010-03-30" target="_blank">30-day run thanks to DHR's forecast</a>. <br />
<br />
The thing is, if the stock continues the performance it started in early 2009 -- we shouldn't need a brokerage to tell us that the stock will do well during the next 30 days. Shares of 3M have advanced along the double-barreled support of its 10- and 20-month trendlines. The last time the equity finished a week below both of these trendlines was more than a year ago.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/3m-company-enjoys-a-solid-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>3M Company Enjoys a Solid Day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/3m-company-enjoys-a-solid-day/">3M Company Enjoys a Solid Day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/3m-company-enjoys-a-solid-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19420258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/3m-company-enjoys-a-solid-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3M Company</category><category>analyst comment</category><category>Blue Chip Stocks</category><category>Danaher</category><category>DHR</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow Jones</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MMM</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Retail Sales and Investors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/28/sunday-funnies-retail-sales-and-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/28/sunday-funnies-retail-sales-and-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/28/sunday-funnies-retail-sales-and-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aeo/" rel="tag">American Eagle Outfitters (AEO)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/coffee.jpg" alt="" />Most of this past week the stock market was erratic. News from Asian and American Markets was generally positive, sending the indexes higher, until unsettling news from the European Union let the air out of the tires, resulting in 100 point swings of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which ended Friday up about 50 points for the week at 10,850.36.</p>
<p>Each day started upbeat and then we would hear about Greek debt, bonds coming due, Germany pushing for IMF participation in any plan to help Greece. Finally when this looked to be settled, we then got news of economic turmoil in Portugal. This activity stimulated me to write the following recent commentary:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/28/sunday-funnies-retail-sales-and-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Retail Sales and Investors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/28/sunday-funnies-retail-sales-and-investors/">Sunday Funnies: Retail Sales and Investors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/28/sunday-funnies-retail-sales-and-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19417344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/28/sunday-funnies-retail-sales-and-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aeo</category><category>american eagle outfitters</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>DJIA Sustainability Index</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>employment</category><category>europa</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>Geely</category><category>greece bailout</category><category>HD</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>interest rates</category><category>portugal the man</category><category>retail sales</category><category>Sunday Funnies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Healthcare, tech and energy to outperform in next 12 months]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/msft.jpg" />For the first half of 2010, almost two thirds of <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125694262091319627.html?mod=BOL_hps_highlight">money managers are bullish</a>, according to <em>Barron's</em>. In fact, 54% are bullish, and 5% are "very bullish." Responses suggest that the Dow Jones Industrial Average is expected to gain another 5% by the end of the year. </p>
<p>According to <em>Barron's</em>, "Today's bullish investors see the major stock indexes making steady progress through next June, amid signs the U.S. economy is on the mend after a searing recession."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Healthcare, tech and energy to outperform in next 12 months</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/">Healthcare, tech and energy to outperform in next 12 months</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125694262091319627.html?mod=BOL_hps_highlight&amp;page=sp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19218760/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/healthcare-tech-and-energy-to-outperform-in-next-12-months/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barrons</category><category>clean technology</category><category>CleanTechnology</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>energy</category><category>financials</category><category>healthcare</category><category>inthenews</category><category>it spending</category><category>ItSpending</category><category>metals</category><category>microsoft</category><category>mining</category><category>money managers</category><category>MoneyManagers</category><category>msft</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Procter &amp; Gamble earnings preview: Are expectations too low?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/procter-and-gamble-earnings-preview-are-expectations-too-low/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/procter-and-gamble-earnings-preview-are-expectations-too-low/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/procter-and-gamble-earnings-preview-are-expectations-too-low/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/procter-and-gamble-pg-logo.gif" alt="" />Before the opening bell sounds on Thursday, October 29, Cincinnati-based Dow component <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) will report fiscal first-quarter earnings. Analysts believe P&amp;G will report <a href="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=56632&amp;source=APOnline">earnings of 99 cents per share with sales of $19.83 billion</a>. </p>
<p>These expected results are lower than those of a year ago, when the company saw earnings of $1.03 per share and revenue of $22 billion. P&amp;G set expectations low for this quarter, as it announced early in the quarter that sales are expected to fall again. Is this truly the case or is it a smart business move?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/procter-and-gamble-earnings-preview-are-expectations-too-low/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Procter &amp; Gamble earnings preview: Are expectations too low?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/procter-and-gamble-earnings-preview-are-expectations-too-low/">Procter &amp; Gamble earnings preview: Are expectations too low?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/procter-and-gamble-earnings-preview-are-expectations-too-low/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19212944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/procter-and-gamble-earnings-preview-are-expectations-too-low/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dow</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter Gamble</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eight ways to define the recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/receessionpicutre.jpg" alt="" />We've watched <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/stockmarket/">stock market</a> numbers bounce around for two years. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Unemployment/">Unemployment</a> stats have served as unpleasant reminders that, for some, leading indicators haven't translated to reality. We look for so many ways to understand the brutal economic environment with which we've had to contend, and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33266915/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/">all the choices can make your head spin</a>. So, let's make it simple. Here are eight ways to tack a label onto the financial world in which we live. </p>
<p><strong>1. Lost market value</strong><br />Total stock market losses from October 2007's top to March 2009's bottom: $11.2 trillion<br />Total gains in the stock market since the bottom: $4.6 trillion<br />Lost ground: $6.6 trillion</p>
<p><strong>2. Bad days<br /></strong>Percentage of the 10 worst days in history for the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DowJonesIndustrialAverage/">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> that happened in 2008, by point drops: 60%<br />Percentage of the 10 worst days in history for the DJIA that happened in 2008, by percentage drops: 30%</p>
<p><strong>3. Mutual funds<br /></strong>Value of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> assets at the end of 2007: $6.5 trillion<br />... and a year later: $3.7 million<br />Lost value: $2.8 trillion</p>
<p>But, it got a little better at the end of August 2009: $4.5 trillion (value of assets)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eight ways to define the recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/">Eight ways to define the recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33266915/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19192550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>djia</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>gold</category><category>home sales</category><category>HomeSales</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's disappoints strangle speculator with Q2 results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/mcdonalds-disappoints-strangle-speculator-with-q2-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/mcdonalds-disappoints-strangle-speculator-with-q2-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/mcdonalds-disappoints-strangle-speculator-with-q2-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-17-200cm101608.jpg" alt="" />As Melly Alazraki <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/before-the-bell-futures-higher-after-fords-surprise-profit-ah/">noted earlier</a> today, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) is one of many heavy hitters to take the earnings stage today. Unfortunately, the fast-food firm didn't exactly impress with its latest quarterly figures; the company struggled under the weight of weak sales during the month of June, and saw its <a href="http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=1014038&amp;Category=Top%20story">second-quarter profits slide 8%</a> year-over-year as a result.</p>
<p>Specifically, the Big Mac parent raked in net income of $1.09 billion, or 98 cents per share, compared to its year-ago results of $1.19 billion, or $1.04 per share. Excluding a one-cent gain, earnings weighed in at 97 cents per share. McDonald's reported that strength in the U.S. dollar negatively impacted its quarterly results by about 9 cents per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/mcdonalds-disappoints-strangle-speculator-with-q2-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McDonald's disappoints strangle speculator with Q2 results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/mcdonalds-disappoints-strangle-speculator-with-q2-results/">McDonald's disappoints strangle speculator with Q2 results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/mcdonalds-disappoints-strangle-speculator-with-q2-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19107322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/mcdonalds-disappoints-strangle-speculator-with-q2-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>currency</category><category>DJIA</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>options</category><category>second-quarter earnings</category><category>strangle</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil down, futures down following holiday weekend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-down-futures-down-following-holiday-weekend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-down-futures-down-following-holiday-weekend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-down-futures-down-following-holiday-weekend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtp/" rel="tag">Rio Tinto plc ADS (RIO)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/logo_shell-oil-(royal-dutch-shell)-at-150.jpg" />When oil lost almost $3 a barrel, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE5501YF20090706" target="_blank">stock futures indicated a lower opening for today</a>. Just shy of 5 AM, S&amp;P 500, Down Jones, and Nasdaq 100 futures were all off 0.9%. The drop in oil to $64 a barrel has called into question any projections of a quick economic recovery -- as if high unemployment weren't enough. The Monday after any long weekend is hard, and this one's going to hurt.</p>
<p>The direction in which futures are pointing continues Thursday's equity declines in the United States, bringing the S&amp;P 500 its third consecutive weekly loss. For the day, it lost 2.91%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 2.63% of its value, with the Nasdaq Composite Index giving up 2.67%. Year-to-date, the DJIA is down 5.6%, the S&amp;P 500 down 0.8%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-down-futures-down-following-holiday-weekend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil down, futures down following holiday weekend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-down-futures-down-following-holiday-weekend/">Oil down, futures down following holiday weekend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-down-futures-down-following-holiday-weekend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19087453/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/oil-down-futures-down-following-holiday-weekend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bemis</category><category>bms</category><category>bp</category><category>british petroleum</category><category>djia</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>general motors</category><category>GM</category><category>gmgmq</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nasdaq100-qqqq</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>rds.a</category><category>royal dutch shell</category><category>s and p 500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will GM finally be kicked out of the Dow?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/will-gm-finally-be-kicked-out-of-the-dow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/will-gm-finally-be-kicked-out-of-the-dow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/will-gm-finally-be-kicked-out-of-the-dow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/gm-hq-1.jpg" />No one can deny the horror that was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gm/nas">General Motors'</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) first quarter financial results . . . even if it did <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/general-motors-tops-expectations-with-a-6-billion-loss-in-the-f/">beat estimates</a>. The automaker reported its eighth consecutive quarterly loss today -- this time in the amount of $6 billion. It also burned $10.2 billion in cash, its sales plunged 40% and it lost market share pretty much everywhere.<br /><br />On that note, it's not surprising the guardians of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> editors, despite trying to keep to a minimum any changes in the component stocks, are finally considering removing the lowest priced stock on the index.<br /><br />John Prestbo, the editor and executive director of Dow Jones Indexes, said in an <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a_HrdoOgKB8g&amp;refer=home">interview with Bloomberg</a> Wednesday: "There are two choices for GM: bankruptcy or increased government ownership. Definitely the trend is in the direction that would force us to remove it."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/will-gm-finally-be-kicked-out-of-the-dow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will GM finally be kicked out of the Dow?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/will-gm-finally-be-kicked-out-of-the-dow/">Will GM finally be kicked out of the Dow?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 May 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/will-gm-finally-be-kicked-out-of-the-dow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1539312/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/will-gm-finally-be-kicked-out-of-the-dow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>fdx</category><category>featured</category><category>ford</category><category>gm</category><category>ups</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will GM get booted from the Dow?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/will-gm-get-booted-from-the-dow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/will-gm-get-booted-from-the-dow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/will-gm-get-booted-from-the-dow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-24-200cm101608.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Plenty of investors have been calling for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) to be removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) as the automaker hovers on the brink of bankruptcy. But, like it or not, GM's rock-bottom share price isn't justification enough to oust the stock. GM still represents a major chunk of our industrial economy.</p>
<p>However, GM's nationalization would more than justify its removal from the Dow. After all, that's why <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) got the boot last fall -- once the government took a controlling stake in the insurance giant, Dow Jones wasted no time adjusting its blue-chip lineup.</p>
<p><em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/will-gm-get-booted-from-the-dow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will GM get booted from the Dow?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/will-gm-get-booted-from-the-dow/">Will GM get booted from the Dow?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/will-gm-get-booted-from-the-dow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1503494/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/will-gm-get-booted-from-the-dow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>c</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>global dow</category><category>GlobalDow</category><category>GM</category><category>nationalization</category><category>rick wagoner</category><category>RickWagoner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The life and times of the original Dow Dozen]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/the-life-and-times-of-the-original-dow-dozen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/the-life-and-times-of-the-original-dow-dozen/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/the-life-and-times-of-the-original-dow-dozen/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img hspace="4" height="150" width="150" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" alt="" />Earlier this week, something a bit odd happened. With beleaguered <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> shares (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) retreating sharply, the company's market cap has declined. As of Thursday morning, it's at $70.7 billion, placing it, for example, below <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), with a market cap of $81.19 billion. That's right ... the venerable conglomerate, maker of aircraft engines, locomotives, and a host of other products, has been outsized by a personal computer company. <br /><br />While this development may just be a blip on the radar of a very tumultuous time in the stock market, it signals a changing tide that began decades ago. GE is the last member standing of the original 12 members of the Dow. Founded in 1896, the average represented 12 of the most significant American companies. Here's what has happened to the rest of them:<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/the-life-and-times-of-the-original-dow-dozen/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The life and times of the original Dow Dozen</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/the-life-and-times-of-the-original-dow-dozen/">The life and times of the original Dow Dozen</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/the-life-and-times-of-the-original-dow-dozen/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1477325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/the-life-and-times-of-the-original-dow-dozen/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>dow jones</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJones</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow Jones Industrial Average blasted for including cheap stocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/dow-jones-industrial-average-blasted-for-including-cheap-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/dow-jones-industrial-average-blasted-for-including-cheap-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/dow-jones-industrial-average-blasted-for-including-cheap-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img hspace="4" height="57" align="right" width="150" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/2012a194649c942af4a1e208cc64acbc.png" alt="" />The Dow Jones Industrial Average is in the headlines everyday, but few people actually understand how it's calculated. The DJIA is the sum of the value of one share of each of the 30 Dow components divided by the DJIA divisor, which is currently 0.1255527090. It's adjusted every now and then for spin-offs, dividends and splits. For geeks, the image at right shows the formula: <em>p</em> equals the price of the shares and <em>d </em>equals the DJIA divisor.<br /><br />So what exactly is wrong with this formula? A ton. Critics have been pointing out forever that weighting the average based on stock price makes no sense because different companies have different numbers of shares outstanding. For example, if <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) were part of the DJIA, its $70,000+ share price would dwarf the influence of all the other components combined. It would make much more sense to use a more holistic measure like market cap or enterprise value.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/dow-jones-industrial-average-blasted-for-including-cheap-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow Jones Industrial Average blasted for including cheap stocks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/dow-jones-industrial-average-blasted-for-including-cheap-stocks/">Dow Jones Industrial Average blasted for including cheap stocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123536230926046055.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/dow-jones-industrial-average-blasted-for-including-cheap-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1468323/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/dow-jones-industrial-average-blasted-for-including-cheap-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cheap Stocks: IBM]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/cheap-stocks-ibm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/cheap-stocks-ibm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/cheap-stocks-ibm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/cheap-stocks-ibm-200cs112608.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of a series featuring bargain stocks that are worth a look now. See more <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/cheap-stocks">Cheap Stocks</a></strong>.</em></p>
<p>From a contrarian perspective, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">International Business Machines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) might seem like an odd choice. Large-cap tech stocks are heavily populated by hedge-fund investors, and securities with this dubious distinction have been absolutely hammered this year. However, there's a certain something about IBM that distinguishes it from the pack.</p>
<p>For starters, there's no cult following for IBM -- and cult favorites, such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">Research In Motion Limited</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>), have performed significantly worse than IBM this year. The market's expectations for these beloved gadget-makers are perpetually running at peak levels, which makes them more vulnerable to a shift in investor sentiment. Conversely, when was the last time you heard someone <em>really</em> getting excited about IBM? In this market, "boring" can be a good thing.</p>
<p>In its mid-October earnings report, IBM edged past analysts' consensus third-quarter profit estimates by 3 cents per share. While sales of computer hardware slipped during the quarter, that weakness was more than offset by strength in software and services revenues. Big Blue also reassured the Street that its liquidity position was "very strong," a comment that carries more weight than ever before in the current environment.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/cheap-stocks-ibm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cheap Stocks: IBM</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/cheap-stocks-ibm/">Cheap Stocks: IBM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/cheap-stocks-ibm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1380661/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/cheap-stocks-ibm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>big blue</category><category>cheap stocks</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>ibm</category><category>international business machines</category><category>Research in Motion</category><category>RIM</category><category>RIMM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why a stock market rally can't be sustained]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/why-a-stock-market-rally-cant-be-sustained/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/why-a-stock-market-rally-cant-be-sustained/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/why-a-stock-market-rally-cant-be-sustained/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>Yesterday, the market had a swing of over 900 points as indexes hit new lows for the year and then pushed upward to close 6% or so higher. Overnight, markets in Asia and Europe staged rallies of their own.</p>
<p>The stock market may march up for a while, but that can't be sustained and the odds are likely that it will crash and make new lows again before year's end.</p>
<p>The fiction is that the markets trade based on what they see six months into the future. Perhaps they see GDP recovering by then. Not a chance.</p>
<p>George Soros said yesterday that there is some chance that the world economy will enter a depression next year. That may be extreme, but a majority of business leaders and economists who want to be heard on the subject say that this is the most significant downturn of their lifetimes.</p>
<p>There is a view that falling housing prices are at the core of the disaster that has overwhelmed the financial structure of the country and is now hurting everything from retail sales to tech company revenue. Housing may be helped by government programs, but if unemployment hits 8% or better next year, the number of people who have to give up their homes could rise sharply. Lower interest rates do not help people out of work.</p>
<p>Another misconception about the future is that oil prices will continue to fall. With some OPEC nation's facing budget deficits due to crude dropping from over $140 to $55, the cartel will have to cut production to meet demand. That may mean a huge cut, but OPEC can match the drop in the global need for oil with a paltry supply.</p>
<p>The stock market has not stopped going down.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/">247wallst.com.</a></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/why-a-stock-market-rally-cant-be-sustained/">Why a stock market rally can't be sustained</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/why-a-stock-market-rally-cant-be-sustained/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1371963/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/why-a-stock-market-rally-cant-be-sustained/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DJIA</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>George soros</category><category>GeorgeSoros</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NASDAQ</category><category>NYSE</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
