<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Analysts' Bad Advice on Arena]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/chasing-value-arena-analysts-bad-advice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/chasing-value-arena-analysts-bad-advice/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/chasing-value-arena-analysts-bad-advice/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/arena-pharmaceuticals.jpg" />What good are analysts who are consistently wrong? For instance, take Arena Pharmaceuticals (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/arena-pharmaceuticals-inc/arna/nas">ARNA</a>) after <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/fda-advisory-panel-votes-against-arena-diet-drug/19637158/">FDA Panel Votes Against Arena's Diet Drug</a> Lorcaserin. How much money did their clients lose? Not all analysts work for brokerage houses, but many do, and their pay is not determined by the accuracy of their calls but the increase in sales.</p>
<p>How do they explain their backpedaling? One day they are pushing the stock and the next they are running for cover. Clearly they have to change their opinions based on new information, but perhaps there was too much wild speculation to begin with. More likely, they made too many false assumptions, which they love to do in a crowd so as not to be the lone incompetent.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/chasing-value-arena-analysts-bad-advice/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Analysts' Bad Advice on Arena</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/chasing-value-arena-analysts-bad-advice/">Chasing Value: Analysts' Bad Advice on Arena</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/chasing-value-arena-analysts-bad-advice/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19637826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/chasing-value-arena-analysts-bad-advice/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysis</category><category>analyst</category><category>arena pharmaceuticals</category><category>ARNA</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>drug appovals</category><category>drugs</category><category>FDA approval</category><category>stock shorting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Looking to Play Defense? Buy Pfizer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/pfe-logo-240.jpg" />Pfizer Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) reported a blowout second quarter this morning prior to the opening bell. Net income attributable to the company increased to $2.475 billion compared to $2.261 billion in the year-ago quarter. On an adjusted basis, quarterly earnings were $4.959 billion, or $0.62 per share, versus $3.249 billion or $0.48 per share, in last year's corresponding quarter. This compared to Wall Street analysts' consensus EPS estimates of $0.52.<br />
<br />
Revenues were up 58% to $17.327 billion which came in way ahead of analysts' estimates of $16.65 billion. The company also reaffirmed its 2010 EPS guidance of $2.10 to $2.20 and said it expects earnings to come in at the higher end of that range. Using these metrics, PFE looks ridiculously cheap (and has been for sometime). The stock has been a favorite of value investors such as David Einhorn because of its blue-chip brand, inexpensive valuation, fat dividend yield, and defensive business profile.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Looking to Play Defense? Buy Pfizer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/">Looking to Play Defense? Buy Pfizer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19579677/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drugs</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>healthcare</category><category>inthenews</category><category>long trading</category><category>PFE</category><category>pfizer</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Raznick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Allergan Second Quarter Earnings Preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/30/allergan-second-quarter-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/30/allergan-second-quarter-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/30/allergan-second-quarter-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agn/" rel="tag">Allergan (AGN)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/allergan-logo.gif"  alt="Allergan logo" />Drug manufacturer Allergan, Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/allergan-inc/agn/nys">AGN</a>) will be reporting its second quarter results on Monday, with analysts expecting to see an 8% earnings increase from the same period last year.</p>
<p>Analysts have forecast earnings of $0.81 for the quarter, versus $0.75 during the same period last year.</p>
<p>Allergan has managed to outpace analyst estimates for each of the past six  quarters, and has not failed to at least match estimates since the  first quarter of 2007.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/30/allergan-second-quarter-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Allergan Second Quarter Earnings Preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/30/allergan-second-quarter-earnings-preview/">Allergan Second Quarter Earnings Preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/30/allergan-second-quarter-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19575693/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/30/allergan-second-quarter-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AGN</category><category>Allergan</category><category>botox</category><category>cosmetics</category><category>drug makers</category><category>drugs</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings preview</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen and CVS Caremark in Benefits Row]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/07/walgreen-cvs-caremark-pharmacy-plans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/07/walgreen-cvs-caremark-pharmacy-plans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/07/walgreen-cvs-caremark-pharmacy-plans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/walgreens-logo-240.jpg" alt="Walgreen WAG logo" />CVS Caremark (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) has received notice from Walgreen (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) that the latter <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/walgreens-will-not-participate-in-future-cvs-caremark-pharmacy-network-plans/rfid336282268/?channel=pf">would not participate as a provider</a> in any new prescription drug plans awarded to CVS's pharmacy benefit manager after June 7.</p>
<p>Walgreen feels that it's no longer "in the best interests of its customers, pharmacists and shareholders to grow its future business" with CVS. Any current CVS plans in which Walgreen is already a service provider will not be impacted.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/07/walgreen-cvs-caremark-pharmacy-plans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen and CVS Caremark in Benefits Row</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/07/walgreen-cvs-caremark-pharmacy-plans/">Walgreen and CVS Caremark in Benefits Row</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/07/walgreen-cvs-caremark-pharmacy-plans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19505870/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/07/walgreen-cvs-caremark-pharmacy-plans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benefits</category><category>CVS</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>drugs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pharmacy</category><category>pharmacy benefits</category><category>provider</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$75 Million in Drugs Stolen from Eli Lilly Warehouse]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/75-million-in-drugs-stolen-from-eli-lilly-warehouse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/75-million-in-drugs-stolen-from-eli-lilly-warehouse/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/75-million-in-drugs-stolen-from-eli-lilly-warehouse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lly/" rel="tag">Lilly (Eli) (LLY)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/logolilly.gif" />Eli Lilly (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/eli-lilly-and-company/lly/nys" target="_blank">LLY</a>) announced Wednesday that burglars broke into a Connecticut-based warehouse over the weekend and <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/health-care/burglars-steal--million-drugs-eli-lilly/" target="_blank">stole roughly $75 million in prescription drugs</a>. According to police, the break-in happened either late Saturday or early Sunday. According to LLY, "dozens of pallets" of antidepressants were stolen, including Prozac, Cymbalta, Zyprexa (an anti-psychotic), and other medicines. The police called the theft a "well-planned event."<br />
<br />
The company stated that it is working with the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/statement-from-eli-lilly-and-company-regarding-stolen-company-products-from-enfield-connecticut-distribution-operations/rfid310030543/?channel=pf" target="_blank">U.S. FDA Office of Criminal Investigations</a> and other law enforcement officials. LLY's senior vice president of global equity noted that the company has "taken quick and appropriate actions to ensure the safety of our medicines." The company added that the "U.S. pharmaceutical distribution system is tightly controlled and monitored, making it extremely difficult for stolen product to make it to patients through legitimate channels."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/75-million-in-drugs-stolen-from-eli-lilly-warehouse/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$75 Million in Drugs Stolen from Eli Lilly Warehouse</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/75-million-in-drugs-stolen-from-eli-lilly-warehouse/">$75 Million in Drugs Stolen from Eli Lilly Warehouse</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/75-million-in-drugs-stolen-from-eli-lilly-warehouse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19404777/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/75-million-in-drugs-stolen-from-eli-lilly-warehouse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crime</category><category>drugs</category><category>Eli Lilly</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LLY</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>theft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pfizer Sees Some Disappointing Study Results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/pfizer-sees-some-disappointing-study-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/pfizer-sees-some-disappointing-study-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/pfizer-sees-some-disappointing-study-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/pfe-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Late Thursday, Pfizer (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) announced that two of its late-stage studies of an approved kidney cancer drug <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/pfizer-says-two-breast-cancer-drug-studies-fail-2010-03-11">failed to treat breast cancer significantly</a>. Reportedly, two studies of kidney cancer drug Sutent did not show a significant benefit to advanced breast cancer patients when combined with chemotherapy. <br />
<br />
This news is definitely a setback for PFE, as it was hoped that Sutent could demonstrate a significant benefit when combined with chemotherapy as opposed to treatment by chemotherapy alone.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/pfizer-sees-some-disappointing-study-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pfizer Sees Some Disappointing Study Results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/pfizer-sees-some-disappointing-study-results/">Pfizer Sees Some Disappointing Study Results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/pfizer-sees-some-disappointing-study-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19396359/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/12/pfizer-sees-some-disappointing-study-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cancer</category><category>cancer treatment</category><category>drug studies</category><category>drugs</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pfe</category><category>pfizer</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Health Insurers Get Brief Relief on Proposed Tax]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsx/" rel="tag">Boston Scientific (BSX)</a></p><p>Insurance companies just bought themselves a year. Claiming that a proposed tax on health insurance would force them to charge higher premiums, carriers were able to convince senators to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=asyq1HrjE1LY&amp;pos=2">defer this particular measure</a> for a year. <br /><br />This comes as a benefit to UnitedHealth Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/unitedhealth-group-incorporated/unh/nys" target="_blank">UNH</a>), WellPoint (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wellpoint-inc/wlp/nys" target="_blank">WLP</a>) and smaller companies writing health insurance policies. Manufacturers of medical devices have won some relief, as well, though the drug business didn't. An earlier plan to tax cosmetic medical procedures was also scrapped.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Health Insurers Get Brief Relief on Proposed Tax</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/">Health Insurers Get Brief Relief on Proposed Tax</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=asyq1HrjE1LY&amp;pos=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19288675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boston scientific</category><category>BSX</category><category>drugs</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GS</category><category>health care</category><category>health insurance</category><category>insurance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mdt</category><category>medical devices</category><category>Medtronic</category><category>pfe</category><category>pfizer</category><category>UNH</category><category>UnitedHealth</category><category>Wellpoint</category><category>WLP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Madoff: Chillin' with mobsters and spies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/madoff-chillin-with-mobsters-and-spies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/madoff-chillin-with-mobsters-and-spies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/madoff-chillin-with-mobsters-and-spies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/alcatraz_prison_jail_1009101_l.jpg" width="160" height="240" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BernieMadoff/">Bernie Madoff</a> is getting used to his new neighbors. Gone are the days of <a href="http://www.luxist.com/2009/10/17/madoff-s-long-island-beach-home-fetches-9-41-million/" target="_blank">Montauk</a> and <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/09/madoff-properties-attracting-potential-buyers/" target="_blank">Manhattan</a>, and he isn't sharing his space with topless dancers. </p>
<p>Now, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2009-10-21-madoff-prison-life_N.htm" target="_blank">he says goodnight to a drug pusher, chills with a former mobster, and hangs with a convicted spy</a> ... and these guys are probably saying, "I hang around with Bernie Madoff." The former <strike>financier</strike> Ponzi schemer spends his evenings walking laps around the prison track at the Butner Federal Correctional Complex, not far from Raleigh, N.C.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/madoff-chillin-with-mobsters-and-spies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Madoff: Chillin' with mobsters and spies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/madoff-chillin-with-mobsters-and-spies/">Madoff: Chillin' with mobsters and spies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/madoff-chillin-with-mobsters-and-spies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19204947/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/madoff-chillin-with-mobsters-and-spies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernie madoff</category><category>butner</category><category>carmine persico</category><category>cocaine</category><category>coke</category><category>colombo</category><category>drug</category><category>drugs</category><category>fbi</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jonathan pollard</category><category>madoff</category><category>madoff securities</category><category>north carolina</category><category>raleigh</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Some big names setting new highs today: STAR, GG, PIR, EBAY]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-today-star-gg-pir-ebay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-today-star-gg-pir-ebay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-today-star-gg-pir-ebay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hal/" rel="tag">Halliburton (HAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gg/" rel="tag">Goldcorp Inc (GG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="new 52 week highs" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/traders_feb272007_stephenchernin_getty_240.jpg" />We had a lot of big names trading up to new 52 week highs again today. The overall markets were pretty flat, with the DOW closing the day down 0.14%, the NASDAQ closing the day's trading up 0.04%, and the S&amp;P ending the day a bit lower to finish today's trading down 0.28%.<br /><br />Here are a few of the names that moved higher during the day to set new 52 week highs.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-today-star-gg-pir-ebay/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Some big names setting new highs today: STAR, GG, PIR, EBAY</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-today-star-gg-pir-ebay/">Some big names setting new highs today: STAR, GG, PIR, EBAY</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-today-star-gg-pir-ebay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19194618/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-today-star-gg-pir-ebay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>52 week highs</category><category>52WeekHighs</category><category>Cisco Systems</category><category>CiscoSystems</category><category>dollar</category><category>drugs</category><category>ebay</category><category>GG</category><category>gold</category><category>Goldcorp</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>HAL</category><category>Halliburton</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>JEF</category><category>Jefferies</category><category>M</category><category>Macys</category><category>new highs</category><category>NewHighs</category><category>Pier 1</category><category>Pier1</category><category>PIR</category><category>retailers</category><category>Schering Plough</category><category>ScheringPlough</category><category>SCSO</category><category>SGP</category><category>STAR</category><category>Starent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Some big names setting new highs: INTC, STX, SGP]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-intc-stx-sgp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-intc-stx-sgp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-intc-stx-sgp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/traders_feb272007_stephenchernin_getty_240.jpg" alt="new 52 week highs" />The markets had a relatively flat day to start the week, but there were some big name stocks that traded up to new 52 week highs in today's session. The DOW was up 0.2%, NASDAQ was down 0.01%, while the S&amp;P saw the most change, closing up 0.4%.<br /><br />Here are a couple of the bigger names that traded up to new 52 week highs in today's trading.<br /><br />
<ol>   </ol>
    <ul>
        <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>): Chipmaker Intel Corp. traded up to a new 52 week high today of $20.65. It set its 52 week low of $12.05 back on 2/23/09. The stock is trading higher today ahead of the company's third quarter earnings numbers, which are due out tomorrow following the market close. Analysts are expecting the company to show earnings of 27 cents per share. The company reported a loss of 7 cents per share for its second quarter. The stock closed the day up 1.1% at $20.40, up $0.23 on the day.</li>
    </ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-intc-stx-sgp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Some big names setting new highs: INTC, STX, SGP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-intc-stx-sgp/">Some big names setting new highs: INTC, STX, SGP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-intc-stx-sgp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19193258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/some-big-names-setting-new-highs-intc-stx-sgp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chip makers</category><category>ChipMakers</category><category>Cisco Systems</category><category>CiscoSystems</category><category>CSCO</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>drug makers</category><category>DrugMakers</category><category>drugs</category><category>earnings</category><category>forecasts</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>Schering Plough</category><category>ScheringPlough</category><category>seagate technology</category><category>SeagateTechnology</category><category>STX</category><category>Target</category><category>technology</category><category>TGT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Warner Chilcott strikes a healthy deal for P&amp;G unit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/warner-chilcott-strikes-a-healthy-deal-for-pandg-unit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/warner-chilcott-strikes-a-healthy-deal-for-pandg-unit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/warner-chilcott-strikes-a-healthy-deal-for-pandg-unit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/chilcott.gif" alt="" />The dealmaking continues apace in the drug sector. Today, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/warner-chilcott-plc-ordinary/wcrx/nas">Warner Chilcott plc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/warner-chilcott-plc-ordinary/wcrx/nas">WCRX</a>) <a href="http://www.pginvestor.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=104574&amp;p=irol-newsArticleMain&amp;ID=1323461">agreed</a> to shell out $3.1 billion for the global pharma business of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>). The deal is all-cash.</p>
<p>There are several megatrends driving the pharma deals. First, it's getting tougher to produce new drugs. And unfortunately, many pharma companies are running out on the patent protection of key money-makers. At the same time, President Obama is intent on getting some type of reform in health care.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/warner-chilcott-strikes-a-healthy-deal-for-pandg-unit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Warner Chilcott strikes a healthy deal for P&amp;G unit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/warner-chilcott-strikes-a-healthy-deal-for-pandg-unit/">Warner Chilcott strikes a healthy deal for P&amp;G unit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/warner-chilcott-strikes-a-healthy-deal-for-pandg-unit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19138436/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/warner-chilcott-strikes-a-healthy-deal-for-pandg-unit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drugs</category><category>health care</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter and Gamble</category><category>Warner Chilcott</category><category>WarnerChilcott</category><category>WCRX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wyeth (WYE) shareholders approve sell to Pfizer (PFE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/wyeth-wye-shareholders-approve-sell-to-pfizer-pfe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/wyeth-wye-shareholders-approve-sell-to-pfizer-pfe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/wyeth-wye-shareholders-approve-sell-to-pfizer-pfe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/wye-wyeth-logo.jpg" alt="Weth Pfizer merger" />The mega pharmaceutical merger between <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wyeth/wye/nys">Wyeth</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wyeth/wye/nys">WYE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) is one step closer to becoming official today after <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090720-707434.html">overwhelming approval by Wyeth shareholders</a>.<br /><br />The shareholder vote to sell Wyeth to Pfizer was not even close. Around 98% of shareholders voted to approve the sale, which is expected to happen by the end of the year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/wyeth-wye-shareholders-approve-sell-to-pfizer-pfe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wyeth (WYE) shareholders approve sell to Pfizer (PFE)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/wyeth-wye-shareholders-approve-sell-to-pfizer-pfe/">Wyeth (WYE) shareholders approve sell to Pfizer (PFE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/wyeth-wye-shareholders-approve-sell-to-pfizer-pfe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/wyeth-wye-shareholders-approve-sell-to-pfizer-pfe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>deals</category><category>drugs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mergers</category><category>news</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>WYE</category><category>Wyeth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Vioxx study: more trouble for Merck (MRK)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/new-vioxx-study-more-trouble-for-merck-mrk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/new-vioxx-study-more-trouble-for-merck-mrk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/new-vioxx-study-more-trouble-for-merck-mrk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">Merck </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>) lost a lot of legal cases over whether its arthritis drug caused heart problems in patients. It even spent $4.85 billion to settle a lot of the claims against it. But, that did not end every suit, and the company is faced with new data that raises questions about the dangers of the drug.</p>
<p>Tough for Merck. But, putting out dangerous drugs can have side affects for both patient and company. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE49C84M20081013">According to</a> <em>Reuters, "</em> A long-term analysis of people who took the arthritis drug Vioxx confirms it doubles the risk of strokes and heart attacks."</p>
<p>Most of these lawsuits come down to "did the company know of the danger, and, if so when?" Merck probably did not settle so many cases because it believed it was entirely in the right. It is hard to imagine that it did not have some sense that the data from the new study is true. It did test its own drug before it went on the market. But, did it test it well? Or, did it find that there were possible health risks but that they were acceptable? At least from a monetary standpoint.</p>
<p>The cynical observers of drug company practices say that the firms balance litigation costs against the money that they get from sales. If a product has some danger, it does not matter too much if it makes a great deal more money than the cost of legal consequences.</p>
<p>If the cynics are right, Merck has a tough road ahead.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/new-vioxx-study-more-trouble-for-merck-mrk/">New Vioxx study: more trouble for Merck (MRK)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE49C84M20081013>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/new-vioxx-study-more-trouble-for-merck-mrk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1341481/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/new-vioxx-study-more-trouble-for-merck-mrk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drugs</category><category>intthenews</category><category>MRK</category><category>scientific research</category><category>ScientificResearch</category><category>Vioxx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Government diabetes study hits a speed bump]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/government-diabetes-study-hits-a-speed-bump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/government-diabetes-study-hits-a-speed-bump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/government-diabetes-study-hits-a-speed-bump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><img width="244" height="NaN" align="right" alt="pill bottle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/pill-bottle-at244-by-shutr.jpg" />The National Institutes for Health has announced the partial suspension of a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=diabetes">diabetes</a> treatment study which was focusing on aggressive measures to reduce blood sugar levels. An <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120231187162747961.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_health">article in <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wall Street Journal</span></a> indicates that the aggressive strategy being used apparently resulted in a small increase in the number of patient deaths as compared to a moderate treatment approach being used on other patients who were involved in the study. The increase was merely three deaths per 1000 patients, yet researchers are unable to correlate the exact reasons for the increase in deaths and therefore the more aggressive portion of the testing has been terminated.<br /><br />The study did not focus on specific treatments. Rather, researchers were attempting to determine the importance of differing treatment strategies. John Buse, president for medicine and science at the American Diabetes Association stated, "We were basically trying to see if we should have a full-court press on blood sugar or just try to do a reasonable job." The study, which is named Accord, involves providing diabetic patients with various drugs in an effort to reduce blood sugar levels and is also seeking to isolate particularly beneficial bio-markers for monitoring diabetic patient health.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/government-diabetes-study-hits-a-speed-bump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Government diabetes study hits a speed bump</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/government-diabetes-study-hits-a-speed-bump/">Government diabetes study hits a speed bump</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120231187162747961.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_health>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/government-diabetes-study-hits-a-speed-bump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1109293/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/government-diabetes-study-hits-a-speed-bump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blood-sugar</category><category>deaths</category><category>diabetes</category><category>drugs</category><category>medical</category><category>monitor</category><category>National-Institutes-of-Health</category><category>pharma</category><category>pharmaceutical</category><category>study</category><category>testing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pfizer's on the rebound]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/pfizer-s-on-the-rebound/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/pfizer-s-on-the-rebound/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/pfizer-s-on-the-rebound/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>It looks like Pfizer is once again on the road to success.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PFE</a>) is the world's largest research-based pharmaceutical company. <br /><br />Analysts say that despite approximately flat 2008 revenue, margins should improve slightly, aided by PFE's restructuring/efficiency improvements designed to net $2 billion in savings by the end of 2008. <br /><br />Analysts also like the growth forecasts for drugs Celebrex and Geodon, and also see more substantial revenue contributions from Lyrica, Sutent, and Chantix. Meanwhile, Lipitor, PFE's largest selling drug, has patent protection through 2010.<br /><br />Analysts also like Pfizer's blue-chip customer list, which includes: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mckesson-corporation/mck/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">McKesson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mckesson-corporation/mck/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MCK</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cardinal-health-incorporated/cah/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Cardinal Health</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cardinal-health-incorporated/cah/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CAH</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amerisourcebergen-corporation/abc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AmerisourceBergen</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amerisourcebergen-corporation/abc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ABC</a>). <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp?symbol=pfe">The Reuters F2008/F2009 EPS consensus estimates</a> for PFE are $2.39/$2.54.<br /><br />The risks? Analysts have an eye on Pfizer's pipeline development, an important component, given upcoming expiration losses, as well the company's roll-out timetable. <br /><br />The First Call mean rating for PFE is: Hold. [24 firms.] Mean 2008 target: $28.00. [high: $33, low: $35.]<br /><br /><strong>Stock Analysis:</strong> Pfizer is a moderate-risk stock not suitable for low-risk investors. Investors with an investment horizon longer than 3 years should be rewarded from PFE's shares. Sell/Stop Loss if you were to purchase shares in this company: $13.<br /><br /><em>Disclosure: Lazzaro has no positions in stocks. In addition to private real estate holdings, he owns corporate and municipal bonds, and cash certificates of deposit.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/pfizer-s-on-the-rebound/">Pfizer's on the rebound</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/pfizer-s-on-the-rebound/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1103931/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/pfizer-s-on-the-rebound/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drug sector</category><category>drugs</category><category>health care</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Covance (CVD) is not recession-proof, but it's close]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/covance-cvd-is-not-recession-proof-but-its-close/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/covance-cvd-is-not-recession-proof-but-its-close/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/covance-cvd-is-not-recession-proof-but-its-close/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img width="175" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="37" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/covance-cvd.gif"  alt="Covance logo " />Given the market's continued choppy/consolidated pattern (or perhaps worse), one would think that there isn't a promising business model in the states today, with a technically-strong stock chart accompanying it. Pre-clinical / clinical research company Covance dispels that thesis. <br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/covance-inc/cvd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Covance</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/covance-inc/cvd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CVD</a>) develops and conducts pre-clinical and clinical trials of potential commercial drugs. The company also offers laboratory testing services to companies in the chemical, agri-chemical, and food sectors.<br /><br />Analysts like CVD's ramping drug development services demand from both pharmaceutical and biotech companies, new orders, market-share increase prospects, and the company's sector-leading research lab. <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp?symbol=cvd">The Reuters F2007/F2008 EPS consensus estimates</a> for CVD are $2.65/$3.12. <br /><br />The risks? Project cancellations, or a reduction in research and development spending by pharmaceutical and/or biotech companies would hurt CVD's results. Analysts also have their eye on a possible slowdown in drug development outsourcing.<br /><br />The First Call mean rating for CVD is: Buy. [14 firms.] Mean 2008 target: $94.00. [high: $106, low: $83.]<br /><strong><br />Stock Analysis:</strong> Covance is a moderate-risk stock not suitable for low-risk investors. Investors with an investment horizon longer than two years should be rewarded from CVD's shares. Sell / Stop Loss if you were to purchase shares in this company: $56.<br /><br /><em>DISCLOSURE: Joseph Lazzaro has no positions in stocks. In addition to private real estate holdings, he owns corporate and municipal bonds, and cash certificates of deposit.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/covance-cvd-is-not-recession-proof-but-its-close/">Covance (CVD) is not recession-proof, but it's close</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/covance-cvd-is-not-recession-proof-but-its-close/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1088741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/covance-cvd-is-not-recession-proof-but-its-close/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>agriculture services</category><category>clinical tests</category><category>Covance</category><category>CVD</category><category>drugs</category><category>pharmaceutical services</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Genentech (DNA) shares dip on underwhelming earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/genentech-dna-shares-dip-on-underwhelming-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/genentech-dna-shares-dip-on-underwhelming-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/genentech-dna-shares-dip-on-underwhelming-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dna/" rel="tag">Genentech Inc (DNA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/genentech-inc-dna-logo.jpg" />One of the problems with being a rapidly growing company, such as biotechnology company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genentech-inc/dna/nys">Genentech</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genentech-inc/dna/nys">DNA</a>) over the past couple of years, has been that sooner or later that growth must slow, and that is exactly what we saw when the company posted <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/22651050">fourth quarter numbers Monday night</a>.<br /><br />Sure the company beat analysts' estimates, sure the company posted a 32 percent jump in annual profit, but when you are coming off a year like the company had in 2006, even these numbers fail to impress. Consider that in 2006, the company showed a mind-boggling 74 percent profit growth. For sure, 2006 was a tough act to follow, and almost impossible for the company to compete against.<br /><br />Looking toward 2008, the company expects to see growth of around 18 percent. Not too shabby, but just not up to par with what investors have come to expect from the nation's largest biotechnology company. Shares of the stock have been trading lower today, and are currently off 2.2 percent at $69.06, and reached a low of $68.11 earlier in the session.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/genentech-dna-shares-dip-on-underwhelming-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Genentech (DNA) shares dip on underwhelming earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/genentech-dna-shares-dip-on-underwhelming-earnings/">Genentech (DNA) shares dip on underwhelming earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/genentech-dna-shares-dip-on-underwhelming-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1087428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/genentech-dna-shares-dip-on-underwhelming-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biotech</category><category>dna</category><category>drugs</category><category>earnings</category><category>Genentech</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Biomarin Pharma has what investors call a 'pipeline of significance']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/biomarin-pharma-has-what-investors-call-a-pipeline-of-significa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/biomarin-pharma-has-what-investors-call-a-pipeline-of-significa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/biomarin-pharma-has-what-investors-call-a-pipeline-of-significa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>Uncertain economic times, it goes without saying, create uphill conditions for most stocks. But that does not mean one should not search for promising opportunities, and one that fits the bill, for high-risk investors, is Biomarin Pharmaceutical. <br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/biomarin-pharmaceutical-inc/bmrn/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc.</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/biomarin-pharmaceutical-inc/bmrn/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">BMRN</a>) develops and commercializes drugs for rare and chronic diseases. <br /><br />Analysts like the fact that two of its drugs qualify for FDA orphan drug status, which grants exclusive marketing rights for seven years.<br /><br />Biomarin's Aldurazyme, the sole therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I), obtained orphan drug status in the U.S. for seven years and in Europe for 10 years. Also, the company's Naglazyme is approved in the U.S. and Europe to treat MPS VI (Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome), another rare, genetic disease. <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp?symbol=bmrn">The Reuters FY 2007/FY 2008 EPS consensus estimates</a> for BMRN are -$0.15 to $0.49.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/biomarin-pharma-has-what-investors-call-a-pipeline-of-significa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Biomarin Pharma has what investors call a 'pipeline of significance'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/biomarin-pharma-has-what-investors-call-a-pipeline-of-significa/">Biomarin Pharma has what investors call a 'pipeline of significance'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/biomarin-pharma-has-what-investors-call-a-pipeline-of-significa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1084786/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/biomarin-pharma-has-what-investors-call-a-pipeline-of-significa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>11108</category><category>Biomarin Pharmaceutical</category><category>BMRN</category><category>drugs</category><category>FDA</category><category>MPS I</category><category>MPS VI</category><category>orphan drugs</category><category>Pharmaceutical sector</category><category>U.S. Food and Drug Administration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five reasons to buy Pfizer (PFE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/five-reasons-to-buy-pfizer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/five-reasons-to-buy-pfizer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/five-reasons-to-buy-pfizer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Pfizer logo " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/pfizer.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) shares are slightly cheaper now than a decade ago, even though the company's per-share profits are more than 70% higher. The stock is unloved for a reason: Pfizer, like many drug makers at the moment, is finding it difficult to develop new medicines.  </p>
<p>The company's biggest seller, Lipitor for lowering cholesterol, faces the loss of patent protection in 2011. Two of Pfizer's past hits, Zoloft for depression and Norvasc for high blood pressure, are already losing sales to generic competitors. Last year, a promising inhaled insulin flopped in the marketplace. The year before, a drug that raises levels of so-called good cholesterol proved too risky, and research was halted.</p>
<p>And Pfizer isn't alone. Last year, the Food and Drug Administration approved just 16 first-of-its-kind drugs, a 20-year low. </p>
<p>All that said, I think the stock warrants a purchase at today's price for five reasons.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/five-reasons-to-buy-pfizer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Five reasons to buy Pfizer (PFE)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/five-reasons-to-buy-pfizer/">Five reasons to buy Pfizer (PFE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/five-reasons-to-buy-pfizer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1084634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/11/five-reasons-to-buy-pfizer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>11108</category><category>drugs</category><category>featured</category><category>healthcare</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>pharmaceutical</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Hough]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options update 12-31-07: Salix volatility jumps on generic Colazal plans]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/31/options-update-12-31-07-salix-volatility-jumps-on-generic-colaz/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/31/options-update-12-31-07-salix-volatility-jumps-on-generic-colaz/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/31/options-update-12-31-07-salix-volatility-jumps-on-generic-colaz/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/salix-pharmaceuticals-inc/slxp/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Salix</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/salix-pharmaceuticals-inc/slxp/nas">SLXP</a>) has announced it will launch a generic version of its Colazal (treatment for ulcerative colitis) with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/watson-pharmaceuticals-inc/wpi/nys">Watson Pharma</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/watson-pharmaceuticals-inc/wpi/nys">WPI</a>). <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mylan-laboratories-inc/myl/nys">Mylan</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mylan-laboratories-inc/myl/nys">MYL</a>), Apotex, and Roxane have received FDA clearance to market their own generic versions of SLXP's Colazal.</p>
<p>SLXP is recently down $1.01 to $8.00 in pre-open trading. Wachovia says, "Valuation range: $9 to $10."</p>
<p>SLXP January option implied volatility of 104 is above its 26-week average of 72 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk. </p>
<p><em>Options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/31/options-update-12-31-07-salix-volatility-jumps-on-generic-colaz/">Options update 12-31-07: Salix volatility jumps on generic Colazal plans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/31/options-update-12-31-07-salix-volatility-jumps-on-generic-colaz/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1074141/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/31/options-update-12-31-07-salix-volatility-jumps-on-generic-colaz/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Colazal</category><category>drugs</category><category>FDA</category><category>generic drugs</category><category>GenericDrugs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>pharma</category><category>Salix</category><category>Wachovia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
