<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen Near 52-Week High After Q1 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/wag-logo.jpg" alt="Walgreen (WAG) logo" />Walgreen (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) is having a merry Christmas. The stock closed on Thursday at $39.19. The 52-week high for the shares is $40.20. Pretty cool for those who own this name. Something even cooler: the drugstore chain issued a solid fiscal first-quarter report earlier in the week.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/walgreen-co-reports-26-5-percent-increase-in-diluted-earnings-per-share-to-a-record-62-cents-for-the-first-quarter-2011/rfid398348925/?channel=pf">press release</a> begins with three bragging bullet points: the top line gained 6% and came in at $17.3 billion; <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Gross%20Margin">gross margin</a> expanded by 80 basis points; <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Operating%20Cash%20Flow%20-%20OCF">operating cash flow</a> was $1.2 billion. Nice, but in terms of the latter point, it should be noted that cash from operations was essentially flat compared to last year's number. That's okay, though, it's still respectable.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen Near 52-Week High After Q1 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/">Walgreen Near 52-Week High After Q1 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19775951/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>DrugStore</category><category>inthenews</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreen earnings</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen Up Big on Q4 News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/28/walgreen-up-big-on-q4-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/28/walgreen-up-big-on-q4-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/28/walgreen-up-big-on-q4-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/wag-logo.jpg" />I never would have predicted such a bullish reaction. As I write this, Walgreen (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) is up over 12% to $34.04 on the back of an earnings report. With one hour to go before the market closes, volume is huge.</p>
<p>Those of you who bought prior to the report could not have possibly expected this. It represents a big departure from the last time the drugstore posted results. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/walgreen-disappoints-market-with-q3-report/">Back in June</a>, shareholders were disappointed with their investment since Wall Street thought the stock should be sold off on the data. It's like night and day this afternoon.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/28/walgreen-up-big-on-q4-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen Up Big on Q4 News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/28/walgreen-up-big-on-q4-news/">Walgreen Up Big on Q4 News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/walgreen-4q-profit-rises-and-tops/536714/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/28/walgreen-up-big-on-q4-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19652094/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/28/walgreen-up-big-on-q4-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>DrugStore</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreens Q4</category><category>WalgreensQ4</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rite Aid Sold on Q2 News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/rite-aid-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/rite-aid-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/rite-aid-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/rite-aid.jpg" alt="" />Rite Aid's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>) sell-off Thursday was almost comical. Sometimes you've just got to laugh when a stock that's trading around a dollar suddenly drops over 13%. That's exactly what the drugstore's shares did by the end of the day's regular session. It finished at a quote of 95 cents. And, as you might expect, volume was pretty significant.<br />
<p>
Who buys a stock like this? Clearly, someone braver than me. Adding this one to a portfolio is basically no different than playing the slots in Vegas. The <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys/tech-chart">one-year chart</a> hasn't changed much since I discussed the company <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/rite-aid-smaller-loss-but-im-not-interested/">back in June</a>; it still tells a tale of volatility and downward momentum. It's not a ride I'm willing to take.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/rite-aid-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rite Aid Sold on Q2 News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/rite-aid-earnings/">Rite Aid Sold on Q2 News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/rite-aid-posts-quarterly-loss-of-23-cents-per-share/19645594/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/rite-aid-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19646850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/rite-aid-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cvs</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>DrugStore</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>RAD</category><category>rite aid</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does CVS Look Okay After Q1 Report?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/cvs-looks-okay-after-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/cvs-looks-okay-after-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/cvs-looks-okay-after-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/cvs-logo-240.jpg" />CVS Caremark (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>), a drugstore chain that competes with Rite-Aid Corporation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>), Walgreen Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), is acting in a boring way this afternoon. My screen shows, at the time of this writing, the stock down 44 cents, or 1.2%, to $36.64.</p>
<p>That's not too bad for the kind of trading session we're having. I bet CVS would have been up today following its Q1 report had the market action been different. But the tape is the tape, you can do nothing about that. According to <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-05-04/cvs-profit-rises-on-prescription-program-at-stores-update2-.html">Bloomberg BusinessWeek</a>, the company made, on an adjusted basis, 60 cents per share, which was two pennies ahead of estimates.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/cvs-looks-okay-after-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does CVS Look Okay After Q1 Report?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/cvs-looks-okay-after-q1/">Does CVS Look Okay After Q1 Report?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 May 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-05-04/cvs-profit-rises-on-prescription-program-at-stores-update2-.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/cvs-looks-okay-after-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19464304/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/04/cvs-looks-okay-after-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>CvsCaremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>inthenews</category><category>RAD</category><category>rite aid</category><category>RiteAid</category><category>WAG</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walgreen</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rite Aid Down on Q4 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/rite-aid-down-on-q4-report-avoid-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/rite-aid-down-on-q4-report-avoid-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/rite-aid-down-on-q4-report-avoid-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/rite20aid20logo.jpg" alt="" />Rite Aid (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>) continues to be a stock that I want to avoid. I know it's risen a lot over the last year, but such price action doesn't sway me in this case.</p>
<p>You've got to be careful when a company reports a loss, even if that loss is narrower than what was reported in the comparable period. In the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/rite-aid-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-fiscal-2010-results/rfid314538044/?channel=pf">fiscal fourth quarter</a>, Rite Aid lost 24 cents per share. Last year at this time, the red ink came out to $2.67 per share. Yes, this is a vast improvement; same thing happened in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/rite-aid-defeats-analysts-in-q3-but-investors-should-be-careful/">third quarter</a> back in December of last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/rite-aid-down-on-q4-report-avoid-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rite Aid Down on Q4 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/rite-aid-down-on-q4-report-avoid-it/">Rite Aid Down on Q4 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/rite-aid-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-fiscal-2010-results/rfid314538044/?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/rite-aid-down-on-q4-report-avoid-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19421812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/rite-aid-down-on-q4-report-avoid-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>inthenews</category><category>RAD</category><category>retail</category><category>rite aid</category><category>RiteAid</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen Company Reports a Not-So-Compelling Second Quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/walgreen-reports-a-not-so-compelling-second-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/walgreen-reports-a-not-so-compelling-second-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/walgreen-reports-a-not-so-compelling-second-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/walgreens-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Walgreen Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), a drugstore entity whose major competitors are CVS Caremark (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>), Rite Aid (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>), and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), reported <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/walgreen-co-reports-second-quarter-2010-earnings-per-diluted-share-of-68-cents-results-include-2-cents-per-diluted-share-of-restructuring-costs/rfid311794686/?channel=pf">second-quarter data</a> earlier today; they weren't too thrilling, to be completely honest.</p>
<p>On a reported basis, net income increased three pennies to 68 cents per share. On an adjusted basis, earnings came out to 70 cents per share (this would be after adding back the two pennies dedicated to restructuring charges). Estimates called for <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wag">71 cents per share</a>. Poor Walgreen just couldn't keep up with the analysts this time around.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/walgreen-reports-a-not-so-compelling-second-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen Company Reports a Not-So-Compelling Second Quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/walgreen-reports-a-not-so-compelling-second-quarter/">Walgreen Company Reports a Not-So-Compelling Second Quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/walgreen-co-reports-second-quarter-2010-earnings-per-diluted-share-of-68-cents-results-include-2-cents-per-diluted-share-of-restructuring-costs/rfid311794686/?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/walgreen-reports-a-not-so-compelling-second-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19411159/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/walgreen-reports-a-not-so-compelling-second-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cvs</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>h1n1</category><category>inthenews</category><category>RAD</category><category>retail</category><category>rite aid</category><category>RiteAid</category><category>WAG</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walgreen</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CVS Caremark: Long-Term Bet After Q4?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/cvs-caremark-long-term-bet-after-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/cvs-caremark-long-term-bet-after-q4/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/cvs-caremark-long-term-bet-after-q4/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/cvs-logo-240.jpg" />CVS Caremark (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>), which competes with Walgreen (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), Rite Aid (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>), and Wal-Mart (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), posted <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/cvs-caremark-reports-record-results-in-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2009/rfid297269160?channel=pf">fourth-quarter data</a> on Monday. Sales increased 7%, and adjusted earnings per share from continuing operations (excluding, in addition, a penny per share relating to a tax benefit) came in at 78 cents -- good for a growth rate of over 11%. That bottom-line performance matched analyst projections, according to our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/cvs-caremark-expected-to-post-higher-q4-profit/">earnings preview</a>.</p>
<p>As we all know, matching expectations is sometimes the death of a stock. The market has no conscience when it comes to mercilessly punishing an equity for not going beyond the call of the analysts. However, CVS actually did pretty well yesterday, rising 5% by the end of the session; the move was backed by healthy volume.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/cvs-caremark-long-term-bet-after-q4/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CVS Caremark: Long-Term Bet After Q4?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/cvs-caremark-long-term-bet-after-q4/">CVS Caremark: Long-Term Bet After Q4?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/cvs-caremark-reports-record-results-in-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2009/rfid297269160?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/cvs-caremark-long-term-bet-after-q4/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19349875/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/cvs-caremark-long-term-bet-after-q4/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>CvsCaremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>featured</category><category>RAD</category><category>retail</category><category>rite aid</category><category>RiteAid</category><category>WAG</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walgreen</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rite Aid Defeats Analysts in Q3, but Investors Should Be Careful]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/rite-aid-defeats-analysts-in-q3-but-investors-should-be-careful/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/rite-aid-defeats-analysts-in-q3-but-investors-should-be-careful/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/rite-aid-defeats-analysts-in-q3-but-investors-should-be-careful/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/rite20aid20logo.jpg" alt="" />Rite Aid (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>), whose colleagues include CVS Caremark (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) and Walgreen (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), reported third-quarter results on Thursday. Although they did show improvement, I think most investors would be better off staying away from the stock.
<p>According to this summary at <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1715713520091217?type=marketsNews">Reuters</a>, top-line sales decreased a little under 2%, and the loss per share came in at 10 cents. This was a lot better than the 30 cents per share lost in the comparable quarter. Expectations were for the red ink to be closer to 18 cents per share. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/rite-aid-defeats-analysts-in-q3-but-investors-should-be-careful/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rite Aid Defeats Analysts in Q3, but Investors Should Be Careful</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/rite-aid-defeats-analysts-in-q3-but-investors-should-be-careful/">Rite Aid Defeats Analysts in Q3, but Investors Should Be Careful</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1715713520091217?type=marketsNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/rite-aid-defeats-analysts-in-q3-but-investors-should-be-careful/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19287197/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/rite-aid-defeats-analysts-in-q3-but-investors-should-be-careful/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>CvsCaremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>inthenews</category><category>RAD</category><category>retail</category><category>Rite Aid</category><category>RiteAid</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rite Aid beats analysts, but not right for me yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/25/rite-aid-beats-analysts-but-not-right-for-me-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/25/rite-aid-beats-analysts-but-not-right-for-me-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/25/rite-aid-beats-analysts-but-not-right-for-me-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/rite.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">Rite Aid</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>), which competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), saw a big increase in volume on Wednesday after it reported earnings for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/rite-aid-reports-first-quarter-fiscal-2010-results/rfid225895991?channel=pf">first quarter</a>. In fact, as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/todays-big-stock-price-moves-on-big-volume/">Douglas McIntyre</a> observed, shares of Rite Aid were up 5% at one point during yesterday's session. However, the shares ended up losing their green status by the close of trading. Rite Aid actually lost 3% when all was said and done. What does it all mean? </p>
<p>Well, Rite Aid did beat analyst forecasts by a wide margin. The call was for a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2454673420090624">loss of 13 cents</a> per share. Rite Aid lost only 6 cents per share once adjustments are made. Revenues dipped a little over 1%, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a>, after excluding the effect of the Brooks Eckerd acquisition, increased 1.5%. Interestingly, the mix of this increase is as follows: the pharmacy sales went up 3.1% on a comparable basis, and the non-pharmacy sales went down 1.4% on the same basis. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/25/rite-aid-beats-analysts-but-not-right-for-me-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rite Aid beats analysts, but not right for me yet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/25/rite-aid-beats-analysts-but-not-right-for-me-yet/">Rite Aid beats analysts, but not right for me yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/rite-aid-reports-first-quarter-fiscal-2010-results/rfid225895991?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/25/rite-aid-beats-analysts-but-not-right-for-me-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19077565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/25/rite-aid-beats-analysts-but-not-right-for-me-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brooks eckerd</category><category>BrooksEckerd</category><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>CvsCaremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>inthenews</category><category>RAD</category><category>rite aid</category><category>RiteAid</category><category>WAG</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen to report Q3 numbers: What should we look for?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/20/walgreen-to-report-q3-numbers-what-should-we-look-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/20/walgreen-to-report-q3-numbers-what-should-we-look-for/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/20/walgreen-to-report-q3-numbers-what-should-we-look-for/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walgreens-wag-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), a drugstore business that competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">Rite-Aid</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>), will be issuing results for the third quarter on Monday, June 22. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wag">Earnings.com</a>, the analyst community is prescribing $0.56 per share for the company.</p>
<p>Of course, the question is: will Walgreen honor that prescription and fill it? I'd say it's quite possible. Last time around, Walgreen beat estimates. The call was for $0.66 per share in Q2. If you look at the <a href="http://investor.walgreens.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=372112">press release</a> from that time, you'll see that, once you adjust for some items, Walgreen went beyond expectations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/20/walgreen-to-report-q3-numbers-what-should-we-look-for/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen to report Q3 numbers: What should we look for?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/20/walgreen-to-report-q3-numbers-what-should-we-look-for/">Walgreen to report Q3 numbers: What should we look for?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wag>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://investor.walgreens.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=372112>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/20/walgreen-to-report-q3-numbers-what-should-we-look-for/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19072931/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/20/walgreen-to-report-q3-numbers-what-should-we-look-for/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>pharmacy</category><category>RAD</category><category>retail</category><category>Rite-Aid</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rite Aid up on Q4 report -- can you buy it now?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/02/rite-aid-up-on-q4-report-can-you-buy-it-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/02/rite-aid-up-on-q4-report-can-you-buy-it-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/02/rite-aid-up-on-q4-report-can-you-buy-it-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">Rite Aid</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>), whose competitors include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), reported Q4 numbers today, and when you read through the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/rite-aid-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full/rfid200342669">release</a>, you sort of come away with a decent feeling. You hear about improvements in this metric and that metric. You wonder if a turnaround might be in the offing. Then you look at the stock price and, even though it is currently being bid higher (it's up over 14% as I write), you come back down to earth and reality hits you in the face. Anything trading under a buck has to give you pause. Rite Aid is no different. </p>
<p>For the quarter, Rite Aid posted a 1.7% decrease in the top line. On an adjusted basis, the drugstore chain reported a loss of $0.14 per share. According to this <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0254352120090402?rpc=33">source</a>, Wall Street thought Rite Aid might lose $0.105 per share. The company is still adjusting to the Brooks Eckerd acquisition. Excluding that effect, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a> increased 0.8%. Including the asset, comps decreased 0.1%. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/02/rite-aid-up-on-q4-report-can-you-buy-it-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rite Aid up on Q4 report -- can you buy it now?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/02/rite-aid-up-on-q4-report-can-you-buy-it-now/">Rite Aid up on Q4 report -- can you buy it now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/rite-aid-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full/rfid200342669>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0254352120090402?rpc=33>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/02/rite-aid-up-on-q4-report-can-you-buy-it-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1506222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/02/rite-aid-up-on-q4-report-can-you-buy-it-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brooks eckerd</category><category>BrooksEckerd</category><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>CvsCaremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>inthenews</category><category>RAD</category><category>retail</category><category>Rite Aid</category><category>RiteAid</category><category>WAG</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen looking for growth with wellness network]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/walgreen-looking-for-growth-with-wellness-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/walgreen-looking-for-growth-with-wellness-network/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/walgreen-looking-for-growth-with-wellness-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walgreens-wag-logo.jpg" />Walgreen</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a> ) knows that people want all kinds of options to meet their healthcare needs. Walgreen also knows that it needs to grow and keep up with competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) and the pharmacy department at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>). And, yes, I suppose <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">Rite-Aid</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>) is technically a competitor, too, although you wouldn't know it by that drugstore chain's stock price. Well, according to <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123189349214879393.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">The Wall Street Journal</a></em>, Walgreen plans to promote an initiative called "Complete Care and Well-Being" to employers. The goal here is to give corporate, as well as government, employees and their families access to healthcare services such as preventive medicine and dental examinations in off-hour time periods. Walgreen will use a network of in-store clinics and health centers to provide these services. That's pretty cool, right? Well, one of the bigger benefits to Walgreen is the synergy it can promote by leveraging this program.
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/walgreen-looking-for-growth-with-wellness-network/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen looking for growth with wellness network</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/walgreen-looking-for-growth-with-wellness-network/">Walgreen looking for growth with wellness network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123189349214879393.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/walgreen-looking-for-growth-with-wellness-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1430006/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/walgreen-looking-for-growth-with-wellness-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>CvsCaremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pharmacy</category><category>RAD</category><category>retail</category><category>Rite-Aid</category><category>WAG</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Will Walgreen's Q1 be healthy or ailing?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/earnings-preview-will-walgreens-q1-be-healthy-or-ailing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/earnings-preview-will-walgreens-q1-be-healthy-or-ailing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/earnings-preview-will-walgreens-q1-be-healthy-or-ailing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walgreens-wag-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), a major drugstore chain whose enemies include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">Rite-Aid</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>), is getting ready to report earnings for its first fiscal quarter on Monday, December 22. It's Christmas week. Will Walgreen bestow a gift of an earnings beat upon the market?</p>
<p>One thing's for sure: the market does not expect much from the drugstore. Wall Street expects<a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wag"> flat performance in Q1</a>. The bottom line should come in somewhere around $0.46 per share, the exact same amount that was booked last year. You know, you figure the company should be able to at least match expectations when the bar is set so low. But it might be tough. We all need access to prescriptions and over-the-counter medications every now and then, and on top of that, many people obviously require long-term drug regimens. So, we can see that the pharmacy part of the equation is somewhat resistant to recession. However, there isn't a pressing need for all the non-pharmacy items in a Walgreen location. You don't need to buy any of those cheap plastic toys, any of those blenders that don't work too well, any of the overpriced groceries, etc. This is where Walgreen has exposure to the weakening consumer. Indeed, the consumer is becoming more and more of a value Grinch as time goes on. People just don't want to pay any more than they have to. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/earnings-preview-will-walgreens-q1-be-healthy-or-ailing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Will Walgreen's Q1 be healthy or ailing?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/earnings-preview-will-walgreens-q1-be-healthy-or-ailing/">Earnings preview: Will Walgreen's Q1 be healthy or ailing?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wag>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/walgreen-stumbles-in-q4/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/18/rite-aid-not-the-right-stock-for-me-or-anyone/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/earnings-preview-will-walgreens-q1-be-healthy-or-ailing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1407362/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/earnings-preview-will-walgreens-q1-be-healthy-or-ailing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>drugstore</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>RAD</category><category>Rite-Aid</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rite Aid (RAD) swings to loss in fourth-quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/rite-aid-rad-swings-to-loss-in-fourth-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/rite-aid-rad-swings-to-loss-in-fourth-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/rite-aid-rad-swings-to-loss-in-fourth-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rad/" rel="tag">Rite Aid Corp (RAD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Shares of nation's third-largest <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23163410@N02/2271927832/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/rite.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">Rite Aid Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rite-aid-corporation/rad/nys">RAD</a>) have been plunging over 8% in early trading after the company announced this morning it <a href="http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=BUSINESS&amp;ID=565277847439410375">swung to a fourth quarter loss</a>. The slump also came after the retailer issued a disappointing 2009 fiscal year guidance.<br /><br />Rite Aid posted a loss of $960.4 million, or $1.20 a share, compared with a profit of $7.1 million, or a penny a share, in the same period a year ago. The company's quarterly numbers were hurt by a income tax charge and other costs connected to its acquisition of more than 1,800 stores last year.<br /><br />Included in the company's earnings numbers were $894.9 million related to a non-cash income tax charge. Excluding that, Rite Aid's quarterly loss would have come at $65.5 million, or 8 cents a share. Analysts' forecast (which typically exclude one time items) was for a loss of 7 cents a share in the quarter, according to Thomson Financial.<em><font size="2" face="Verdana"><span id="optspots"><br /><br /><br /></span></font></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/rite-aid-rad-swings-to-loss-in-fourth-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rite Aid (RAD) swings to loss in fourth-quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/rite-aid-rad-swings-to-loss-in-fourth-quarter/">Rite Aid (RAD) swings to loss in fourth-quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/rite-aid-rad-swings-to-loss-in-fourth-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1163637/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/rite-aid-rad-swings-to-loss-in-fourth-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drugstore</category><category>earnings</category><category>forecast</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rad</category><category>recession</category><category>Rite Aid</category><category>RiteAid</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliza Popescu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen Co. (WAG) sales on the rise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/walgreen-co-wag-sales-on-the-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/walgreen-co-wag-sales-on-the-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/walgreen-co-wag-sales-on-the-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="35" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walgreens-wag-logo.jpg" alt="Walgreens logo" />Even when the economy struggles, people still need medicine, diapers, personal-care products, and large boxes of candy. This explains the continued sales growth at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), which saw same-store sales in February <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/23462799">jump 8.3%</a>. Strong Valentine's Day sales and a particularly violent flu season helped boost demand at the pharmaceutical retailer. <br /><br />Excluding the extra shopping day due to Leap Year, same-store sales were up 4.2%. Same-store sales in the chain's pharmacies rose 8.3% and climbed 4.1% excluding February 29. Sales from the pharmacy were modestly impacted by the transition of popular allergy medicine Zyrtec to an over-the-counter version. In turn, the appearance of Zyrtec on the regular shelves positively impacted general-merchandise (or front-end) sales, which rose 8.2% in February, or 4.6% excluding the extra shopping day. <br /><br />The impact of these sales on the bottom line will be more apparent late this month; WAG is currently scheduled to report its quarterly earnings results on March 24. According to <em>First Call </em>estimates, Wall Street is expecting per-share results of 67 cents, or two pennies better than year-ago figures. <br /><br />In late-morning trading, WAG shares have risen 0.8%. The shares have shown recent strength, tacking on nearly 13% since their late-January nadir. <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a></em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/walgreen-co-wag-sales-on-the-rise/">Walgreen Co. (WAG) sales on the rise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/23462799>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/walgreen-co-wag-sales-on-the-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1131022/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/walgreen-co-wag-sales-on-the-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drugstore</category><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pharmacy</category><category>retailers</category><category>sales</category><category>WAG</category><category>Zyrtec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
