<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[S&amp;P rated deal 'structured by cows' according to SEC report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mhp/" rel="tag">McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)</a></p><p><img height="96" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/sp_logo.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121764476728206967.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required) has obtained a draft version of the SEC's report on bond-rating firms and their role in the credit bubble, and some of the stuff is pretty scary.</p>
<p>In one e-mail, a staffer at Standard &amp; Poor's, which is own by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">McGraw-Hill</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">MHP</a>) told another that "we rate every deal," and that "it could be structured by cows and we would rate it."</p>
<p>Another wrote that "rating agencies continue to create" an "even bigger monster -- the CDO market. Let's hope we are all wealthy and retired by the time this house of cards falters. ;O)"</p>
<p>Yes -- complete with the smiley face. If this seems reminiscent of disgraced analyst Henry Blodget's e-mails bashing stocks he was publicly pumping during the dot-com bubble, that's because it's exactly the same. The lesson here, once again, is this: e-mails ever really get deleted permanently and, if you're being shady or doing something unethical, make a phone call, talk with the person in a dark alley, or send them a letter that they can promptly discard. Don't send an e-mail!</p>
<p>Of course, S&amp;P's investment-grade ratings on CDOs stuffed with dodgy loans turned out to be wildly optimistic, and the house of cards has done more than falter -- it's brought down Bear Stearns and wreaked havoc on the economy.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/">S&amp;P rated deal 'structured by cows' according to SEC report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1273560/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>bond rating</category><category>BSC</category><category>CDOs</category><category>e-mail</category><category>Henry Blodget</category><category>inthenews</category><category>McGraw-Hill</category><category>MHP</category><category>ratings agencies</category><category>SEC</category><category>SP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft + Yahoo! vs. Google: E-mail competition getting jiggy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-e-mail-competition-getting-jiggy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-e-mail-competition-getting-jiggy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-e-mail-competition-getting-jiggy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p>Lot's of ink has been spilled on these pages about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and what this might mean for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and for the entire search industry. See <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/02/microsoft-yahoo-and-google-let-the-war-games-continue/">Gary Sattler's article</a> on his views of how this may play out.</p>
<p>Tech guru, Tim O'Reilly takes a different tack on sizing up the news. On his blog, <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/02/microsoft_yahoo_email_not_search.html">O'Reilly examines</a> what this merger activity would mean for the whole e-mail industry, not search. "And for Microsoft, it could be a fatal mistake to take the battle to Google on its own ground. That's the very mistake that companies like Netscape made in competing with Microsoft," says O'Reilly.</p>
<p>Instead, posits O'Reilly, the combined Yahoo! and Microsoft should focus on their dominance in the e-mail industry. Yahoo Mail is still an industry leader online and Microsoft has huge assets in the corporate realm with Outlook and Exchange. Says O'Reilly, "Now think about all the possibilities that are starting to be explored in the area of e-mail data as a source of information about users, and a locus for building new services for those users."</p>
<p>This could get very interesting.</p>
<p><em>Zack Miller is the Managing Editor of <a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/">IsraelNewsletter.com</a> and a former equity analyst for a leading multinational hedge fund. Author owns a long-term stock position in Google.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-e-mail-competition-getting-jiggy/">Microsoft + Yahoo! vs. Google: E-mail competition getting jiggy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-e-mail-competition-getting-jiggy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1105094/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/microsoft-yahoo-vs-google-e-mail-competition-getting-jiggy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>e-mail</category><category>Gary Sattler</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Tim O'Reilly</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Using AOL (TWX) and BlackBerry (RIMM) to document your spouse's affair]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/using-aol-twx-and-blackberry-rimm-to-document-your-spouses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/using-aol-twx-and-blackberry-rimm-to-document-your-spouses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/using-aol-twx-and-blackberry-rimm-to-document-your-spouses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/smartphones/" rel="tag">Smartphones</a></p><p>The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/15/business/15divorce.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=all">New York Times</a></em> [registration required] reports that spouses are using electronic means to spy on their significant others. Here are three examples:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Research in Motion Ltd.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">RIMM</a>) BlackBerry uncovers a husband's affair with a medical resident.</strong> One woman noticed that her husband, a Manhattan surgeon, was distant and obsessed with his BlackBerry. She drew him a bubble bath on his birthday and then pounced on the BlackBerry while he was in the tub. His e-mail messages documented his affair with a medical resident, including plans for a liaison that night. A few weeks later, she found messages in his AOL e-mail from a mortgage company proving he'd purchased a $3 million Manhattan condominium for his trysts with the medical resident.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>)'s AOL e-mail reveals wife's Australian lover. </strong>A Philadelphia man believed his wife was engaging in secret online correspondence. He found e-mail messages to a lover in Australia that she had sent from a private AOL account on the family computer. The man's lawyer used the AOL e-mails as evidence to help win a legal dispute between the man and his wife and an advantageous settlement.</div>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/using-aol-twx-and-blackberry-rimm-to-document-your-spouses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Using AOL (TWX) and BlackBerry (RIMM) to document your spouse's affair</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/using-aol-twx-and-blackberry-rimm-to-document-your-spouses/">Using AOL (TWX) and BlackBerry (RIMM) to document your spouse's affair</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/using-aol-twx-and-blackberry-rimm-to-document-your-spouses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/990258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/using-aol-twx-and-blackberry-rimm-to-document-your-spouses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>e-mail</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PC Pandora</category><category>Research in Motion</category><category>RIMM</category><category>TIme Warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should you file for 'email bankruptcy?']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/should-you-file-for-e-mail-bankruptcy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/should-you-file-for-e-mail-bankruptcy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/should-you-file-for-e-mail-bankruptcy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>If your email inbox is overflowing, you don't have to spend the next three hours responding, you can tell everyone you know that you're filing for email bankruptcy. According to today's <em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18855410/">Washington Post</a></em>, that means either you'll just ask people to resend their emails if they expect a response (<strong>weak form</strong>) or you'll sign off from email altogether (<strong>strong form</strong>).</p>
<p>I first got exposed to email at MIT back in 1980 when it was used on a few university and military computers. I could not see declaring email bankruptcy, although I don't get that much email. However, I do have other email problems: too much spam and an unreliable Yahoo! email account.</p>
<p>But some people have so much email that they declare <strong>weak form</strong> email bankruptcy. For example, In April, venture capitalist Fred Wilson announced he was giving up on responding to all the email piled up in his inbox. "I am so far behind on email that I am declaring bankruptcy," he wrote. "If you've sent me an email (and you aren't my wife, partner, or colleague), you might want to send it again. I am starting over."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/should-you-file-for-e-mail-bankruptcy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should you file for 'email bankruptcy?'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/should-you-file-for-e-mail-bankruptcy/">Should you file for 'email bankruptcy?'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 May 2007 19:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18855410/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/should-you-file-for-e-mail-bankruptcy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/903870/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/should-you-file-for-e-mail-bankruptcy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>e-mail</category><category>e-mail bankruptcy</category><category>E-mailBankruptcy</category><category>email</category><category>email bankruptcy</category><category>EmailBankruptcy</category><category>strong form</category><category>StrongForm</category><category>weak form</category><category>WeakForm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 19:11:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
