BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com BloggingStocks http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/feedlogo.gif BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[Cookie Dough Shortage in Our Future? ]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/cookie-dough-shortage-in-our-future/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/cookie-dough-shortage-in-our-future/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/cookie-dough-shortage-in-our-future/#commentsFiled under: ,

Remember the Eggo waffle shortage in November that had everyone up in arms? Well, we could all be facing a similar crisis soon with a treat that's even more sinful: cookie dough.

Now, we all know we are supposed to cut and bake that tube of raw cookie dough, but how many of us haven't opted, instead, to grab a spoon and dig in? It's not the healthiest practice to begin with, for sure, but it becomes a bit more dodgy if harmful bacteria is involved.

Continue reading Cookie Dough Shortage in Our Future?

Cookie Dough Shortage in Our Future? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>cookie doughE. colifeaturedinthenewsnestleNSRGYrecallsFri, 15 Jan 2010 11:40:00 EST<![CDATA[Whole Foods recalls beef from E. coli scandal-embroiled supplier]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/10/whole-foods-recalls-beef-from-e-coli-scandal-embroiled-supplier/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/10/whole-foods-recalls-beef-from-e-coli-scandal-embroiled-supplier/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/10/whole-foods-recalls-beef-from-e-coli-scandal-embroiled-supplier/#commentsFiled under: , ,

When you're hot you're hot, and when you're Whole Foods Market (NASDAQ: WFMI) you're ice cold -- and you're a health food store recalling beef provided by a supplier with a long history of USDA run-ins and a role in the latest outbreak of E. coli.

The Washington Post reports that "The meat Whole Foods recalled came from Coleman Natural Foods, which unbeknownst to Whole Foods had processed it at Nebraska Beef, an Omaha meatpacker with a history of food-safety and other violations. Nebraska Beef last month recalled more than 5 million pounds of beef produced in May and June after its meat was blamed for another E. coli outbreak in seven states."

Nebraska Beef's history of run-ins with the FDA is pretty remarkable: sanctions for problems including feces-contaminated carcasses, water from pipes dripping onto meat, and E. coli issues as far back as 1997.

That Whole Foods was unaware that it was acquiring its merchandise from such a questionable source raises serious questions about its quality control and sourcing -- those are two of the main reasons that many consumers are willing to pay a premium for Whole Foods products.

This is probably an isolated incident but, from a PR perspective, it's likely to be very damaging. With its reputation for being expensive (see Sarah Gilbert's Whole Paycheck) hurting sales in the current climate, Whole Foods is ill-equipped to deal with a scandal like this.

Whole Foods recalls beef from E. coli scandal-embroiled supplier originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>beef recallE. coliFDAinthenewsNebraska Beefquality controlWFMIWhole FoodsSun, 10 Aug 2008 14:10:00 EST<![CDATA[Best & Worst of 2007: Most worrisome consumer trends]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-worrisome-consumer-trends/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-worrisome-consumer-trends/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-worrisome-consumer-trends/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

This post was part of AOL Money & Finance's Best & Worst of 2007 feature. Voting has now closed and readers have chosen rising fuel prices as the most worrisome consumer trend. Be sure to let us know in the comments if you are pleased with this result.

Worrisome consumer trend The most Worrisome Consumer Trend of 2007 is ... whichever one you choose. The following is my analysis of four candidates -- ranging from can't sleep at night to minor complaint:

  • China product recalls. 30 million Chinese products -- many of them toys -- have been recalled in the last several months. With the holiday shopping season in full swing, this has to be among the most worrisome consumer trends. It's not easy to find out if a product is made in China. This list of U.S. made toys might help, and this list of Made in America products might also be useful.
  • Subprime and mortgage meltdown. The cost to society of the subprime mortgage meltdown could be as high as $4 trillion. Two million people are expected to lose their homes to foreclosure by the end of 2008. If you are one of these people, this trend is definitely costing you sleep. And since there's no way of knowing how widespread the damage will be, everyone in the world should be worrying about this one.

Continue reading Best & Worst of 2007: Most worrisome consumer trends

Best & Worst of 2007: Most worrisome consumer trends originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>beef pricesBest and Worst of 2007Chinese productsE. colifood pricesfood safetyforeclosuresmortgage meltdownoil pricesrecallssubprimeTopps MeatFri, 30 Nov 2007 06:10:00 EST<![CDATA[Taco Bell sued]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/23/taco-bell-sued/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/23/taco-bell-sued/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/23/taco-bell-sued/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

After dealing late last year with an E. coli outbreak which was initially thought to trace back to raw green onions, Taco Bell -- a division of Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) -- is being summoned to court. The Southern California farm responsible for harvesting said controversial (but in fact perfectly fine) green onions has filed a libel lawsuit, alleging that the fast food company continued to attribute the outbreak to the farm's green onions, even though the produce was not contaminated.

An attorney for Boskovich Farms has said that "Taco Bell engaged in an irresponsible and intentional crusade to save its own brand at the expense of an innocent supplier." This move ultimately cost the Farms "millions of dollars in business."

A Taco Bell spokesperson said the fast food company was merely acting in the interest of safety for its customers. "We believed green onions may have been the source based on the presumptive positive testing, so we immediately removed them from our products . . . we later learned they were not the source of the E. coli outbreak." Later analysis indicated that lettuce was the likely source of the outbreak, but not before green onions were stripped from all items at the company's 5,800 worldwide locations. Lettuce still remains in about 70% of the Taco Bell menu items.

The breakout, which caused more than 70 people in the Northeast to fall sick, cost the chain an estimated $20 million in operating profit.

In early trading, YUM shares are virtually unchanged.

Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at Schaeffer's Investment Research.

Taco Bell sued originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:05:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>Boskovich farmsBoskovichFarmse. coliE.Colilawsuitslibeltaco bellTacoBellYUMFri, 23 Mar 2007 12:05:00 EST<![CDATA[Taco Bell, E. coli and the fast food nation]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/taco-bell-e-coli-and-the-fast-food-nation/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/taco-bell-e-coli-and-the-fast-food-nation/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/taco-bell-e-coli-and-the-fast-food-nation/#commentssays that the food at all of its restaurants is safe. The green onions suspected as the source of the recent E. coli outbreak in the northeast are gone, and the company has switched suppliers in the region. Over 50 people have ended up in the hospital as a result of the E. coli outbreak, but there is hope that the worst is past, despite the fact the bacteria has surfaced in a Taco Bell in New York City.

The question is why E. coli continues to be such a threat to consumers throughout the country. In today's New York Times, Eric Schlosser addresses the issue. Schlosser is the author of Fast Food Nation, a fascinating and at times alarming look at the fast food industry and its place in American culture. He argues that changes in the way food is produced in the US over the last 40 years have raised the odds of widespread outbreaks of E.coli and other food-borne pathogens.

One big change is the concentration of producers. Food in the US is now produced by a few large corporations, rather than many smaller ones. For example, today 13 slaughterhouses produce most of the meat eaten by Americans. This means that once there is a problem, it tends to spread far and wide within a large company's national network. Years ago, when producers were smaller, problems in the food supply chain would remain local.

The second big change is in the food safety system. Large food corporations have fought relentlessly to reduce the number and frequency of federal inspections. In the 1970s, the Food and Drug Administration made 35,000 food safety inspections per year. Today, there are less than 3,400. And the number of inspectors has fallen by roughly 20%.

So the solution to the problem seems fairly obvious. Given the growth of the food network, we need more food safety inspectors. And there needs to be real penalties for producers who break the rules. This runs contrary to the American suspicion of government, but if the government doesn't monitor the safety of the food system, who will? As Schlosser writes, "whether you're a Republican or a Democrat, you still have to eat." And eating without worrying about E.coli seems like something worth paying for.

Taco Bell, E. coli and the fast food nation originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:39:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>e. coliE.ColiEric SchlosserEricSchlosserTaco BellTacoBellYUMMon, 11 Dec 2006 12:39:00 EST<![CDATA[Taco Bell nixes green onions]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/taco-bell-nixes-green-onions/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/taco-bell-nixes-green-onions/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/taco-bell-nixes-green-onions/#commentsordered all of its stores to stop using green onions in its fast food. Taco Bell, a unit of Yum Brands Inc. (NYSE: YUM), does not have conclusive proof that green onions are the source of a recent E. coli breakout in its stores in Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey. But given that green onions have been linked to such outbreaks in the past, the company decided to stop serving the savory bulb as a matter of caution.

Ben Berkowitz blogged about this earlier this week. He actually suffered through an E. coli infection as a child, and reminds us how serious this can be. Children have died from the bacteria in the past, so extreme caution is well-advised.

The larger question is why E. coli outbreaks have become a regular feature of the American food system. Is it an inevitable product of how food is produced in the U.S.? Farming in the U.S. is now dominated by large corporations and industrial methods. Waste from massive feed lots inevitably contaminates fruit and vegetables through shared irrigation systems. And industrial meat processing seems to increase the infection of meat. It may be that the whole system needs more careful monitoring and regulation. It may be more expensive, but I for one would pay a little more to avoid eating an E. coli sandwich.

If you are concerned about this, or if you have recently eaten in a Taco Bell and have questions, you can call 1-800-TACO BELL to contact the company.

Taco Bell nixes green onions originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>e. coliE.ColiTaco BellTacoBellYUMYum BrandsYumBrandsWed, 06 Dec 2006 11:50:00 EST<![CDATA[E. coli at Taco Bell: 1993's Jack in the Box all over again?]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/e-coli-at-taco-bell-1993s-jack-in-the-box-all-over-again/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/e-coli-at-taco-bell-1993s-jack-in-the-box-all-over-again/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/e-coli-at-taco-bell-1993s-jack-in-the-box-all-over-again/#commentsFiled under: , , , ,

It started with just a couple of people at a couple of restaurants in New Jersey, but within a day or two, Taco Bells across New York and New Jersey were being shuttered as dozens came down sick with the E. coli bacteria.

No one is yet suggesting that this particular outbreak will be anything like the 1993 Jack in the Box tragedy, when four kids died from eating tainted meat. It does, however, raise questions as to how it happened and, more importantly, what the source was. Bad meat? Dirty lettuce? Sanitary procedures? (Which seems unlikely, given the distance between the restaurants).

Having had an E. coli infection myself when I was young, I can attest to how unpleasant and unfortunate it is -- think lots of pain, dehydration, lack of sleep, inability to eat. And that's in a very mild case; the sickest victims are suffering permanent kidney damage and worse.

Continue reading E. coli at Taco Bell: 1993's Jack in the Box all over again?

E. coli at Taco Bell: 1993's Jack in the Box all over again? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 05 Dec 2006 09:22:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>e. coliE.Colitaco bellTacoBellyum brandsYumBrandsTue, 05 Dec 2006 09:22:00 EST